North Korea's isolation is Kim's fault just as much as anyone else's. He's well aware
I often wonder just how 'aware' he is of these things.
He's a third generation dictator and a vicious little sociopath.
I can't decide if he does these things because he's delusional and believed this is his right... or if because he rationally knows the truth and does it anyway. In both scenarios he's a crazy, vicious little runt who places no value on the lives of people. The outcome is still the same.
Of course it's his fault.
I'm just not sure if anybody really has an understanding of which kind of vicious little bastard he is, or if it really makes a difference. He is the center of his universe, and is more than willing to do anything to keep that position.
Whether this is from delusion or conviction, I have no idea. But he clearly has no interest in changing things, he consistently shows he wants to solidify his hold on power. Including waving around weapons to threaten the world around him and act like he's some great world power.
Except those things usually don't have enough horsepower to do the work themselves, so they send it all back to a central thing which does the work and sends back results.
Which means, as currently deployed, these things mostly do require internet connections... and that's kind of the problem. You end up with machines which might be constantly sending everything around them to the mothership, which stands a good chance of being misused and exploited in ways we'd prefer it not be.
Essentially you bug your home or office so that in the small amount of time you want voice control, it can figure out what you need.
Now, picture this in a corporate boardroom, a hospital, or other place in which there are legal requirements around confidential information... suddenly every bit of what everyone says is streamed to a 3rd party whose EULA says "we own this shit, bitches".
In its current form, voice control is just handing all of your data to a third party who you should assume will have decreed they can do anything they want with it. And, of course, government can secretly demand access to it.
This is Big Brother, only we've willingly invited him into our homes, placed the data under the control of a corporation, and decided that's perfectly fine.
I don't get all of this, and frankly it's a little creepy.
From Barbies which upload everything your child says to a server, to XBox units which send everything in your living to Microsoft, to whatever the hell an Amazon Echo is... why the hell are people willing to accept something around them which is always listening, and always uploading everything you say to the internet?
You want one of these things in your home, go right a head, that is your choice. But bringing shit like this into an office where it affects other people? That should be against a lot of corporate policies -- and in a lot of workplaces probably violates some legal requirements.
I trust neither the competence, security practices, or behavior of these companies. They don't give a crap about you or your security, they care about monetization and analytics... which means I assume anything written by Amazon like this is at least some fraction intended to line of the pockets of a corporation.
You bring stuff like this into a workspace, and you should expect someone is going to be pretty pissed off that they're included in this without their consent.
Keep your shiny baubles which violate your own privacy the hell home -- the workplace is NOT a place where everyone is willing to consent to the terms of service of Amazon just because some ass got a shiny toy for Christmas.
Yet in every other case, running deprecated software is inadvisable and a stupid thing to do. Not defending Microsoft's piece of shit browser, but the fact that old, vulnerable and generally terrible versions like 8-10 are being phased out is a good thing.
Oh, don't get me wrong... every single version of IE has been a steaming piece of shit.
Upgrade to something else.
But the reality is a lot of people are stuck on older OS's on older machines and don't have the skills or money to upgrade to a new machine. These things won't go away simply because Microsoft abandons people. It just means a large amount of people are stuck with old and busted with little choice.
The problem is people should have stopped using IE years ago; because it's pretty much always been crap.
Or, guy with unfinished product has no idea of cost but needs to get investors to keep giving him money so he can finish building it.
There's little more dishonest than someone who doesn't yet have a product telling you how awesome their product is going to be... and that includes telling you what the price will be.
Until there's a product, it's just PR and marketing. And, really, once there's a product, it's just PR and marketing.
It's that a "naked singularity" is a very specific term
Which would have no meaning to the intended audience.
This is an important concept in physics
And is, again, too fine of a distinction for the target audience to shove into the headline.
It's using words that can be seen to make sense (you can't see it, so it's an invisibility cloak!), but it gives readers the totally wrong impression of what is being discussed.
As opposed to, what, writing a headline which nobody will want to read the article??
If you publish an academic article on the topic, by all means use as much scientific specificity as you require for a full educated audience who understands the nuances of this. If you publish an internet news story intended for laypeople to read and go "wow, that's kind of cool", you sure as hell don't start throwing around terms which have such highly specific meaning.
The people who know these distinctions aren't the ones reading these articles. The ones who don't know these distinctions don't want a bunch of confusing shit thrown at them which makes them think "I don't want to read this crap because I have no idea what the fuck it means, if I wanted to read a science paper on a naked singularity I'd have majored in fucking physics".
Just who the hell do you think this article was written for? It sure as hell wasn't Stephen Hawking.
Do you ever in your life need to communicate with people with less than complete knowledge on a specific topic? If you do, do you go straight to being an asshole and talking in highly specific nuanced technical language and piss them off?
I'm assuming the link to arxiv.org is incorrect, but a headline like "The Origin of Double-Peaked Narrow Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei I: Very Large Array Detections of Dual AGNs and AGN Outflows" would NEVER make a curious layperson read the damned article... and you can rest assured, the article on sciencemag.org is NOT targeting the people who understand this highly specific and nuanced disctinction.
Pedantry has its time and place. Appealing to merely curious laypeople isn't one of them.
No, a good editor isn't going to put such rubbish into a headline.
This was the headline in both TFS, and TFA.
If every headline (by which we mean the brief title at the beginning of a story (by which we mean an article or essay)) is going to provide the reader (by which we mean the intended audience), with a fully expanded (by which we mean explain in more detail) version of every word used in the headline (see above) to convey more information (by which we mean clarify)... then not a single article would ever get finished.
You could put that in a paragraph, but if people started putting that shit into headlines it would be stupid and useless.
Well, given that most people don't know the term singularity, you can safely assume that they used the word black hole so people would know what they were talking about.
The $2 million settlement will be used to compensate Lumosity consumers who were misled by false advertising
Name me one fucking instance where the settlement went to the consumers who were misled. This will go the lawyers, and you'll get mailed a fucking coupon for $5 off your next goddamned month of Lumosity.
These settlements are complete horseshit, and don't act as a deterrent. Compensate consumers my ass.
And, yes, I'm intentionally swearing for effect, because claiming this will compensate consumers if a completely fucking lie.
You want to compensate people and act as a deterrent? Let them line up and take a swipe at the CEO. THAT might stop this kind of behavior. This $2 million settlement? That won't do a damned thing.
Well, look at it this way... if it exhibits a periodic dimming, then either something is orbiting it, or some feature of the star has a periodicity which needs to be explained.
People forget that they're mostly inferring based on what they can see of the light from the star dimming in some interval (something transiting in front of it), or in measuring a wobble in the star (again light, suggesting gravity is at work and deflecting the star).
It's not like they can directly photograph it, and we have to be lucky enough to get the right view of it to even see it.
It's basic science... observe, hypothesize, observe some more, refine your hypothesis... keep going.
I'm also sure nobody is saying the original researchers were faking it or did it wrong. It's just now several years later and we have better techniques.
If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.
Me, I read the summary and think "damn, this stuff is cool". Because it's only really around 20 years since we've been able to do this. Before that it was speculative science. Now people treat it like it's commonplace.
For me, as always, thanks to the people who keep the universe wondrous and awesome by showing us just how complex and amazing it really is.
You know, the majority of grey "duct" tape is NOT suitable for sealing ducts. It has to be rated to not degrade in the heat, and most stuff isn't.
Color of duct tape has no bearing these days on what it's suitable for... because you can buy pink camo duct tape or duct tape with bunnies on it.
Yes, the actual foil tape for ducts is what you want. I've applied a huge amount of it in my basement ducting and furnace so the heat/cooling goes where it's meant to. It's amazing how much you can improve the temperatures in your house by doing it, because most ducts leak air like a sieve at the seams.
Generally speaking, if you see grey "duct" tape on your ducts it's probably the wrong stuff. Most of what is called "duct" tape isn't rated for use on actual heating ducts. It's just an all purpose, but sturdy, adhesive tape.
Of course, that doesn't mean I don't keep several rolls of it around for other purposes. And I used to know people who maintained that most forms of motorsports would grind to a halt without "hundred mile an hour tape".;-)
But having inherited several tens of thousands of lines of C code for which the authors had all left, and needing to work through it, fix something, and then eventually get it to compile on a different platform... and then over time fix memory leaks and performance bottlenecks... well, I don't think it's for everybody.
Not sure I'd want to do it again, but I really enjoyed it at the time. I know for a fact at least one person me before had run screaming from the task.
Having spent a good chunk of my career maintaining legacy code for which the original authors have long since moved on, I can say it's a special skill to wade though existing code and figure out what the hell it does and how to fix/modify it.
I've known several people who ran screaming from legacy code. It's not for everybody.
In fairness, it did lose. Nobody is going to go out and buy a new CP/M system.
That there are still ancient machines running this stuff surprises nobody. But, let's face it, everybody knows it's antiquated.
What people often fail to realize is that antiquated technology which still works is far more useful than the brand new hotness which can't do the same thing.
Because what people often fail to realize is that bomb-proof code (no pun intended in your case) which has been optimized to fit into a small memory footprint and been running for decades does exactly what it's supposed to, and does it well.
All these kiddies forget that you couldn't just write bloated code and then suggest people go buy more RAM. Well, they don't forget it, they have no idea of what it meant to have to squeeze code into what is now considered trivial amounts of RAM.
I remember having to cram some sparse information into the tiniest amount of memory I could devise because more memory wasn't an option. Meanwhile a friend who had admin perms just assumed he could have a huge whack of virtual memory on the VAX and didn't care about how he stored it. The prof ended up stealing how I did it for his own stuff, because accounting for architecture mine was about 10x faster as a result of being 100x smaller in memory -- precisely because wasting memory wouldn't work and I needed to create a new data structure to get it done.
Nowadays the idea of optimizing for performance or memory gets you looked at like you've lost your mind. "Why optimize when you can have more memory or CPU?" Write shit code now and don't worry about it. Of course, the problem is once you realize it's shit code you can't fix the underlying problem because your 'elegant' code isn't capable of being fixed.
Hmmm... where was I... oh yeah, I had an onion on my belt, because that was the style...;-)
Well, I will say the general issue here is people are willing to accept shit security for a shiny bauble. And that's their own damned problem.
Until companies bear real legal liability for being incompetent at implementing security, I am going to assume that every new product which wants to connect to the internet is a steaming pile of shit I have no interest in.
If you can open your door from your cell phone, someone else can too. And there's a very good chance it's so damned trivial to bypass that it would be scary.
You won't see a culture of development as being highly focused on security until corporations bear legal liability for it. As long as they don't, you pretty much have to assume there is pretty much no security at all.
Me, I simply don't give a damn about products which want to connect to the internet so I can access them from my phone. Because I see no reason to control my entire life from my phone or the internet.
What everyone else does... not my damned problem.
I'm just simply not going to act like I have any sympathy anymore. What the world needs right now is a lot more bitter old men giving their best Nelson "Ha ha!" when this shit happens. Maybe shame will finally work where trying to explain the problem has failed.
Why would you trust your fscking cable company to be your security alarm? What makes you think they have any expertise in this field?
I find this stuff to be mostly self-inflicted stupidity on behalf of consumers.
Every week we see yet another story indicating that consumer electronics have absolute garbage security, and are rushed out the door by people do don't give a crap about your security.
All this smart home crap, and all of this home monitoring crap pushed by your cable company? It's stuff being rushed to market by assholes in marketing. They either don't do security at all, or they do it incompetently.
Until companies bear some legal liability, which their lobbyists will ensure they never do, there's only one sensible option: Assume every damned Internet of Shit product which comes along is so massively insecure as to be dangerous.
Because in all likelihood it is.
This shit is more about selling you product and gathering marketing and analytics data than it is about your damned home security. Just because some idiot slapped on a shoddy wifi connection and wrote an app for your phone doesn't mean they're selling you anything other than snake oil.
You want an alarm? Go with a proper alarm company with actual experience in the field.
Every single day I'm forced to conclude the internet of stuff and the appification of the world is a bloody waste of time and money. And they have an EULA which basically says "we're not responsible no matter how grossly incompetent we are".
Now, get off my damned lawn as I continue to keep most of my things in the analog world and not give a shit if you get hacked or not.
Slashdot Mirror
I often wonder just how 'aware' he is of these things.
He's a third generation dictator and a vicious little sociopath.
I can't decide if he does these things because he's delusional and believed this is his right ... or if because he rationally knows the truth and does it anyway. In both scenarios he's a crazy, vicious little runt who places no value on the lives of people. The outcome is still the same.
Of course it's his fault.
I'm just not sure if anybody really has an understanding of which kind of vicious little bastard he is, or if it really makes a difference. He is the center of his universe, and is more than willing to do anything to keep that position.
Whether this is from delusion or conviction, I have no idea. But he clearly has no interest in changing things, he consistently shows he wants to solidify his hold on power. Including waving around weapons to threaten the world around him and act like he's some great world power.
Except those things usually don't have enough horsepower to do the work themselves, so they send it all back to a central thing which does the work and sends back results.
Which means, as currently deployed, these things mostly do require internet connections ... and that's kind of the problem. You end up with machines which might be constantly sending everything around them to the mothership, which stands a good chance of being misused and exploited in ways we'd prefer it not be.
Essentially you bug your home or office so that in the small amount of time you want voice control, it can figure out what you need.
Now, picture this in a corporate boardroom, a hospital, or other place in which there are legal requirements around confidential information ... suddenly every bit of what everyone says is streamed to a 3rd party whose EULA says "we own this shit, bitches".
In its current form, voice control is just handing all of your data to a third party who you should assume will have decreed they can do anything they want with it. And, of course, government can secretly demand access to it.
This is Big Brother, only we've willingly invited him into our homes, placed the data under the control of a corporation, and decided that's perfectly fine.
I don't get all of this, and frankly it's a little creepy.
From Barbies which upload everything your child says to a server, to XBox units which send everything in your living to Microsoft, to whatever the hell an Amazon Echo is ... why the hell are people willing to accept something around them which is always listening, and always uploading everything you say to the internet?
You want one of these things in your home, go right a head, that is your choice. But bringing shit like this into an office where it affects other people? That should be against a lot of corporate policies -- and in a lot of workplaces probably violates some legal requirements.
I trust neither the competence, security practices, or behavior of these companies. They don't give a crap about you or your security, they care about monetization and analytics ... which means I assume anything written by Amazon like this is at least some fraction intended to line of the pockets of a corporation.
You bring stuff like this into a workspace, and you should expect someone is going to be pretty pissed off that they're included in this without their consent.
Keep your shiny baubles which violate your own privacy the hell home -- the workplace is NOT a place where everyone is willing to consent to the terms of service of Amazon just because some ass got a shiny toy for Christmas.
Oh, don't get me wrong ... every single version of IE has been a steaming piece of shit.
Upgrade to something else.
But the reality is a lot of people are stuck on older OS's on older machines and don't have the skills or money to upgrade to a new machine. These things won't go away simply because Microsoft abandons people. It just means a large amount of people are stuck with old and busted with little choice.
The problem is people should have stopped using IE years ago; because it's pretty much always been crap.
Protip: If you're sitting next to your wife watching VR porn on your oculus and using your own hand ... your wife is still gonna notice.
Maybe, maybe not ... but the fapping will be impossible to miss.
Or, guy with unfinished product has no idea of cost but needs to get investors to keep giving him money so he can finish building it.
There's little more dishonest than someone who doesn't yet have a product telling you how awesome their product is going to be ... and that includes telling you what the price will be.
Until there's a product, it's just PR and marketing. And, really, once there's a product, it's just PR and marketing.
In my experience it's usually the shitty mobile sites at fault.
I can't tell you how often I have to select "request desktop site" because the mobile site is utter crap.
Essentially, yes .. if you haven't upgraded to our new hotness by now, we're going to abandon you and not give a crap what happens.
If you have upgraded to the new hotness, we have total control over your PC and mission accomplished.
No, I didn't miss it, it's a stupid point.
Which would have no meaning to the intended audience.
And is, again, too fine of a distinction for the target audience to shove into the headline.
As opposed to, what, writing a headline which nobody will want to read the article??
If you publish an academic article on the topic, by all means use as much scientific specificity as you require for a full educated audience who understands the nuances of this. If you publish an internet news story intended for laypeople to read and go "wow, that's kind of cool", you sure as hell don't start throwing around terms which have such highly specific meaning.
The people who know these distinctions aren't the ones reading these articles. The ones who don't know these distinctions don't want a bunch of confusing shit thrown at them which makes them think "I don't want to read this crap because I have no idea what the fuck it means, if I wanted to read a science paper on a naked singularity I'd have majored in fucking physics".
Just who the hell do you think this article was written for? It sure as hell wasn't Stephen Hawking.
Do you ever in your life need to communicate with people with less than complete knowledge on a specific topic? If you do, do you go straight to being an asshole and talking in highly specific nuanced technical language and piss them off?
I'm assuming the link to arxiv.org is incorrect, but a headline like "The Origin of Double-Peaked Narrow Lines in Active Galactic Nuclei I: Very Large Array Detections of Dual AGNs and AGN Outflows" would NEVER make a curious layperson read the damned article ... and you can rest assured, the article on sciencemag.org is NOT targeting the people who understand this highly specific and nuanced disctinction.
Pedantry has its time and place. Appealing to merely curious laypeople isn't one of them.
No, a good editor isn't going to put such rubbish into a headline.
This was the headline in both TFS, and TFA.
If every headline (by which we mean the brief title at the beginning of a story (by which we mean an article or essay)) is going to provide the reader (by which we mean the intended audience), with a fully expanded (by which we mean explain in more detail) version of every word used in the headline (see above) to convey more information (by which we mean clarify) ... then not a single article would ever get finished.
You could put that in a paragraph, but if people started putting that shit into headlines it would be stupid and useless.
Well, given that most people don't know the term singularity, you can safely assume that they used the word black hole so people would know what they were talking about.
It's the layman's term, but it isn't confusing.
You understand this is a fix for the Nexus devices, right? Those are the Google branded ones without OEM crap on them.
So, no.
The OEMs have likely introduced their own security holes they'll have to deal with.
Man, that title sounds like a cross between a Nancy Drew book and some really bad porn.
Oh, don't get me wrong ... I am a grumpy old man with an onion on my belt.
But for cool stuff like this, I'm as giddy as a schoolgirl. ;-)
Fuck off.
I will not buy a car with your shit in it. Not now, not ever.
Name me one fucking instance where the settlement went to the consumers who were misled. This will go the lawyers, and you'll get mailed a fucking coupon for $5 off your next goddamned month of Lumosity.
These settlements are complete horseshit, and don't act as a deterrent. Compensate consumers my ass.
And, yes, I'm intentionally swearing for effect, because claiming this will compensate consumers if a completely fucking lie.
You want to compensate people and act as a deterrent? Let them line up and take a swipe at the CEO. THAT might stop this kind of behavior. This $2 million settlement? That won't do a damned thing.
Well, look at it this way ... if it exhibits a periodic dimming, then either something is orbiting it, or some feature of the star has a periodicity which needs to be explained.
People forget that they're mostly inferring based on what they can see of the light from the star dimming in some interval (something transiting in front of it), or in measuring a wobble in the star (again light, suggesting gravity is at work and deflecting the star).
It's not like they can directly photograph it, and we have to be lucky enough to get the right view of it to even see it.
It's basic science ... observe, hypothesize, observe some more, refine your hypothesis ... keep going.
I'm also sure nobody is saying the original researchers were faking it or did it wrong. It's just now several years later and we have better techniques.
If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.
Me, I read the summary and think "damn, this stuff is cool". Because it's only really around 20 years since we've been able to do this. Before that it was speculative science. Now people treat it like it's commonplace.
For me, as always, thanks to the people who keep the universe wondrous and awesome by showing us just how complex and amazing it really is.
You know, the majority of grey "duct" tape is NOT suitable for sealing ducts. It has to be rated to not degrade in the heat, and most stuff isn't.
Color of duct tape has no bearing these days on what it's suitable for ... because you can buy pink camo duct tape or duct tape with bunnies on it.
Yes, the actual foil tape for ducts is what you want. I've applied a huge amount of it in my basement ducting and furnace so the heat/cooling goes where it's meant to. It's amazing how much you can improve the temperatures in your house by doing it, because most ducts leak air like a sieve at the seams.
Generally speaking, if you see grey "duct" tape on your ducts it's probably the wrong stuff. Most of what is called "duct" tape isn't rated for use on actual heating ducts. It's just an all purpose, but sturdy, adhesive tape.
Of course, that doesn't mean I don't keep several rolls of it around for other purposes. And I used to know people who maintained that most forms of motorsports would grind to a halt without "hundred mile an hour tape". ;-)
I've only ever used punch cards as notepads.
But having inherited several tens of thousands of lines of C code for which the authors had all left, and needing to work through it, fix something, and then eventually get it to compile on a different platform ... and then over time fix memory leaks and performance bottlenecks ... well, I don't think it's for everybody.
Not sure I'd want to do it again, but I really enjoyed it at the time. I know for a fact at least one person me before had run screaming from the task.
You, sir, are truly hardcore.
Having spent a good chunk of my career maintaining legacy code for which the original authors have long since moved on, I can say it's a special skill to wade though existing code and figure out what the hell it does and how to fix/modify it.
I've known several people who ran screaming from legacy code. It's not for everybody.
In fairness, it did lose. Nobody is going to go out and buy a new CP/M system.
That there are still ancient machines running this stuff surprises nobody. But, let's face it, everybody knows it's antiquated.
What people often fail to realize is that antiquated technology which still works is far more useful than the brand new hotness which can't do the same thing.
Because what people often fail to realize is that bomb-proof code (no pun intended in your case) which has been optimized to fit into a small memory footprint and been running for decades does exactly what it's supposed to, and does it well.
All these kiddies forget that you couldn't just write bloated code and then suggest people go buy more RAM. Well, they don't forget it, they have no idea of what it meant to have to squeeze code into what is now considered trivial amounts of RAM.
I remember having to cram some sparse information into the tiniest amount of memory I could devise because more memory wasn't an option. Meanwhile a friend who had admin perms just assumed he could have a huge whack of virtual memory on the VAX and didn't care about how he stored it. The prof ended up stealing how I did it for his own stuff, because accounting for architecture mine was about 10x faster as a result of being 100x smaller in memory -- precisely because wasting memory wouldn't work and I needed to create a new data structure to get it done.
Nowadays the idea of optimizing for performance or memory gets you looked at like you've lost your mind. "Why optimize when you can have more memory or CPU?" Write shit code now and don't worry about it. Of course, the problem is once you realize it's shit code you can't fix the underlying problem because your 'elegant' code isn't capable of being fixed.
Hmmm ... where was I ... oh yeah, I had an onion on my belt, because that was the style ... ;-)
LOL ... I have very fond memories of fan-fold greenbar paper to mark up some code with a coffee for an hour or so before I went back to fix the code.
Programming involved a lot more thinking and planning, instead of bashing it until it compiled.
Well, I will say the general issue here is people are willing to accept shit security for a shiny bauble. And that's their own damned problem.
Until companies bear real legal liability for being incompetent at implementing security, I am going to assume that every new product which wants to connect to the internet is a steaming pile of shit I have no interest in.
If you can open your door from your cell phone, someone else can too. And there's a very good chance it's so damned trivial to bypass that it would be scary.
You won't see a culture of development as being highly focused on security until corporations bear legal liability for it. As long as they don't, you pretty much have to assume there is pretty much no security at all.
Me, I simply don't give a damn about products which want to connect to the internet so I can access them from my phone. Because I see no reason to control my entire life from my phone or the internet.
What everyone else does ... not my damned problem.
I'm just simply not going to act like I have any sympathy anymore. What the world needs right now is a lot more bitter old men giving their best Nelson "Ha ha!" when this shit happens. Maybe shame will finally work where trying to explain the problem has failed.
Why would you trust your fscking cable company to be your security alarm? What makes you think they have any expertise in this field?
I find this stuff to be mostly self-inflicted stupidity on behalf of consumers.
Every week we see yet another story indicating that consumer electronics have absolute garbage security, and are rushed out the door by people do don't give a crap about your security.
All this smart home crap, and all of this home monitoring crap pushed by your cable company? It's stuff being rushed to market by assholes in marketing. They either don't do security at all, or they do it incompetently.
Until companies bear some legal liability, which their lobbyists will ensure they never do, there's only one sensible option: Assume every damned Internet of Shit product which comes along is so massively insecure as to be dangerous.
Because in all likelihood it is.
This shit is more about selling you product and gathering marketing and analytics data than it is about your damned home security. Just because some idiot slapped on a shoddy wifi connection and wrote an app for your phone doesn't mean they're selling you anything other than snake oil.
You want an alarm? Go with a proper alarm company with actual experience in the field.
Every single day I'm forced to conclude the internet of stuff and the appification of the world is a bloody waste of time and money. And they have an EULA which basically says "we're not responsible no matter how grossly incompetent we are".
Now, get off my damned lawn as I continue to keep most of my things in the analog world and not give a shit if you get hacked or not.