More like "Google told antimoveon how to chnage their ad so it [wouldn't be shown to people looking for general information about moveon.org, be it good or bad]. They declined."
So now if you disagree with an organization, you can't even out them by name? The trademark cases were where people were searching for "crest toothpaste" and getting "ultra-brite", not searching for "crest toothpaste" and getting a generic "crest toothpaste sucks" ad.
If you are talking about what I think you are talking about, you should know that you can put a -1 funny modifier in your options. That, combined with sorting by highest score, makes Slashdot comments the best on the net.
We must go at least 12 months, because I'm sure he would have tried to have only had to pay capital gains. If he didn't, the 'paltry' 5.1 million was more like ~3 million after tax, though if he did hold out 12 months, he ended up a little worse off.
Funny, it's the British that colonized "Burma" in a reign of terror the likes of which could only be seen in modern days as the actions of an Axis of Evil to-wit, non-withstanding.
even better was to have a second friend do a second earthquake: for each person/guard you would get a another guard.. this could continue for quite a while.
The difference is that fiat currency can be arbitrarily increased by politicians with ease whereas increasing the available gold supply requires more time and effort. Let's assume the gold supply was fixed. Someone who owned 5% of the gold in 1910 *no* work and did *not* lend any of it would would still own %5 of the gold out there today. If gold was the monetary currency, they would basically be rewarded for all of our achievements even though they did nothing on their own, nor did they even lend to the achievers!
Huh? Before the (second) war, the Iraq sanctions that were starving the Iraqi's were imposed by *us*; it was only the rest of the world that was still basically willing to deal with them, so we didn't 'protect' them from anything, we just realized those sanctions were expensive for *us* as well, and rather than admitting that and dropping them outright, we bombed them away with a new war.
What's the difference? What underlying principle says you should be able to own physical objects? There is none. Just because Jane Brat was born to a rich man, she is automatically entitled to essentially anything she desires for the rest of her life?
Slashdot Mirror
"If you enter my property"
Stop right there, under rule base 203 there is no property.
Tens of thousands of WoW characters.
Nintendo sells it's consoles at a profit (though admittedly they didn't always).
Yep, the FCC has auctioned off the public airwaves to them. So, if you want cell service, that is precisely what has going on.
Too lazy to link, but you are basically correct; only instead of Utah being the only hold up, it was several European nations.
More like "Google told antimoveon how to chnage their ad so it [wouldn't be shown to people looking for general information about moveon.org, be it good or bad]. They declined."
So now if you disagree with an organization, you can't even out them by name? The trademark cases were where people were searching for "crest toothpaste" and getting "ultra-brite", not searching for "crest toothpaste" and getting a generic "crest toothpaste sucks" ad.
If you are talking about what I think you are talking about, you should know that you can put a -1 funny modifier in your options. That, combined with sorting by highest score, makes Slashdot comments the best on the net.
We must go at least 12 months, because I'm sure he would have tried to have only had to pay capital gains. If he didn't, the 'paltry' 5.1 million was more like ~3 million after tax, though if he did hold out 12 months, he ended up a little worse off.
wow, he is a god. it really had me fooled for a minute, most youtube vids being as out of sync as they are.
err, s/FPLv2/GPLv2
Since the GPLv2 is the biggest open-source license and is compatible with the FPLv2, that isn't true =)
It wouldn't matter because 'their' su wouldn't have the setuid bit set to root.
Wrong. The GPL license is copyrighted (but you can do sort of 'constitutional amendments' and get the same effect).
Funny, it's the British that colonized "Burma" in a reign of terror the likes of which could only be seen in modern days as the actions of an Axis of Evil to-wit, non-withstanding.
Wrong; that exploit is only available because you chose to set up an insecure system by allowing a user into the wheel group.
even better was to have a second friend do a second earthquake: for each person/guard you would get a another guard.. this could continue for quite a while.
The only reason we are hearing about Burma and we didn't hear about places like East Timor is that Burma is *full* of natural gas.
There is no reason you can't.
Huh? Before the (second) war, the Iraq sanctions that were starving the Iraqi's were imposed by *us*; it was only the rest of the world that was still basically willing to deal with them, so we didn't 'protect' them from anything, we just realized those sanctions were expensive for *us* as well, and rather than admitting that and dropping them outright, we bombed them away with a new war.
What's the difference? What underlying principle says you should be able to own physical objects? There is none. Just because Jane Brat was born to a rich man, she is automatically entitled to essentially anything she desires for the rest of her life?
That's GNU/Russian OS, damnit! It's what those commies at the FSF have always dreamed of.
Unfortunately for him? He's likely to get a huge settlement out of this; way beyond his real pain and suffering. Mark my words.
So you are saying Nike saved them from starving to death. Exactly my point.