"I keep my GSM phone in my pocket... but maybe more risk of something else near my thigh." The word you are looking for is testicles. Home of some of the fastest dividing cells in your body; cells are most vulnerable to mutation from radiation when dividing.
Yes there is a difference. Burn hydrogen with air and you get water. The nitrogen stays in the air and doesn't chemically combine with anything to any relevant degree; what's your point again?
No magic involved. I'm not fucking talking about QM, get it through your head. I'm talking about combining digital logic caused by actual flow of fluid with having solutions of different compounds in the actual fluid. You could therefore use this to do complex logic in mixing operations and basically if you use the equivilant of a multiplexer you could test all possible combinations in parrallel at the same time of x different fluids. You could also do much cooler stuff than this such as getting into the non-combinational circuit realm. DNA computing works by basically trying every possible combination to a problem. It does not make solving NP complete problems doable in P time blah blah blah and I'm not suggesting that fluid computing does either. Get it through your head. I'm (we're) talking about combinining the flow of logic with the actual physical flow of test material.
Quite convient of you to leave out the fact that before saying that he quoted and then said: " the 64bit-ness provides a speed boost to the 32bit apps and OS
This is a lie. Period."
A little different in that context isn't it? You are the definition of flamebait whether it was intentional or not on your part.
You completely misinterpreted his post. When he says you can quickly cycle through all combinations he means *actually moving the fluid to physically test all possible combinations*. He wasn't talking about quantum physics. Think DNA computing. Somewhat different than what he was talking about but way more like it than what you were talking about. DNA computing physically tries each combination by using essentially massively parrallel computation.
Thats the idea. There's already a gonna be a 17 year old getting his ass shot anyway. Why not yours? If there was the possibility that it might be yours getting shot perhaps you might be a little more reluctant to go to war. (I assume from your post you are rich enough that your son would never have to consider joining the military to for instance raise a child).
And the dwarf finds itself in quite the pickle without a new host to feed on (look out earth).
Re:Unfortunate...
on
How to Podcast
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Umm already the ipod allows you to store un-DRMed music on it, so why would.001% using pirated radio really make them change anything when probably more than 50% of ipod owners already have copyrighted music which they downloaded off P2P on there anyway? Its not like this little gem is bigger than that hope diamond.
This is only valid for 64bit applications. The parent was talking about 32 bit applications being run on the 64bit architechture. They don't take advantage of the increased register size so what again is your point?
Nice to see you mention title 17. Since you are so familiar with it I am surprized you don't know about some common exemptions present in chapter motherfucking ONE of that title:
110. Limitations on exclusive rights: Exemption of certain performances and displays (5)
(A) except as provided in subparagraph (B), communication of a transmission embodying a performance or display of a work by the public reception of the transmission on a single receiving apparatus of a kind commonly used in private homes, unless--
(i) a direct charge is made to see or hear the transmission; or
(ii) the transmission thus received is further transmitted to the public;
Read my clarification for a little better analogy to software EULAs. I didn't go into enough detail to show what I was really getting at in my original post.
A little clarification: Imagine if you bought a CD, payed with cash, as you walked out the door you were forced to sign the contract or they smashed your CD and you were not allowed a return.
You don't get to read the EULA before you have already purchased the software and many stores will NOT take back opened software. I see some lawsuits coming against said stores if this appeal doesn't work out. Imagine if when you bought a music CD you had to sign a contract saying you wouldn't allow anyone but yourself to hear any time you played it.
We are talking "unauthorized" by the author, not by the government. Basically the argument arose because the poster made a statement which did not take public domain into account. You're going back and trying to defend the poster's statement on a technicallity when infact the post which you are responding to attacked the poster by bringing up the same technicallity. He didn't mention that Shakespeare was in the public domain explicitly but believe me: that was his whole point. Please join the conversation at any time.
Well even if you really did know the difference there's no need to didn't did not did away with didn't done did done defensive about the mistake which you made. Your mistake; my mistake. Difference to be learned. Don't try and done did but try not didn't come around and try and turn this on me.
"In the last 4 years in America the number of billionares has increased and at the same time poverty has steadiliy increased!" Wow, talk about the percentages of the two and you may have a point. You do realize that the population has increased as well, no?
"hey, let's face facts. anyone who has no qualms about distributing crackz and warez and copyrighted items would certainly have none about distributing *really* bad stuff. perhaps it's not just the software at fault." You are telling me my mother who downloaded a Beegees album yesterday and probably subsequently shared it would have no qualms about distributing "*really* bad stuff?" I might buy it if you left off the asterisks, why did you have to go and leave them in? Why... WHY?
Hate to burst your bubble but when talking about the resolution in print you talk about how many dots per inch it can do. These "dots" can't vary in strength. The "dots" on a monitor can. It takes a lot higher resolution in print to meet the quality provided by the equivilant resolution on a monitor. Clear enough?
Slashdot Mirror
"I keep my GSM phone in my pocket ... but maybe more risk of something else near my thigh." The word you are looking for is testicles. Home of some of the fastest dividing cells in your body; cells are most vulnerable to mutation from radiation when dividing.
Wow genius, you missed where I used "to" in place of "too." BTW, not too be mean but you used to many o's in no.
You are being to harsh on him; he's just trying too make a helpful critique.
Yes there is a difference. Burn hydrogen with air and you get water. The nitrogen stays in the air and doesn't chemically combine with anything to any relevant degree; what's your point again?
Carmack didn't make a bunch of promises about Doom3 he didn't keep. He didn't need to apologize.
No magic involved. I'm not fucking talking about QM, get it through your head. I'm talking about combining digital logic caused by actual flow of fluid with having solutions of different compounds in the actual fluid. You could therefore use this to do complex logic in mixing operations and basically if you use the equivilant of a multiplexer you could test all possible combinations in parrallel at the same time of x different fluids. You could also do much cooler stuff than this such as getting into the non-combinational circuit realm. DNA computing works by basically trying every possible combination to a problem. It does not make solving NP complete problems doable in P time blah blah blah and I'm not suggesting that fluid computing does either. Get it through your head. I'm (we're) talking about combinining the flow of logic with the actual physical flow of test material.
Good. The induce act was unnecessary as the napster case already showed.
Quite convient of you to leave out the fact that before saying that he quoted and then said: " the 64bit-ness provides a speed boost to the 32bit apps and OS
This is a lie. Period."
A little different in that context isn't it? You are the definition of flamebait whether it was intentional or not on your part.
The company who found the genes on the guy probably wouldn't have had any motivation to do so if they couldn't protect it with patent.
You completely misinterpreted his post. When he says you can quickly cycle through all combinations he means *actually moving the fluid to physically test all possible combinations*. He wasn't talking about quantum physics. Think DNA computing. Somewhat different than what he was talking about but way more like it than what you were talking about. DNA computing physically tries each combination by using essentially massively parrallel computation.
Recursive parent folder referencing defacto RSS atom linking.
Thats the idea. There's already a gonna be a 17 year old getting his ass shot anyway. Why not yours? If there was the possibility that it might be yours getting shot perhaps you might be a little more reluctant to go to war. (I assume from your post you are rich enough that your son would never have to consider joining the military to for instance raise a child).
And the dwarf finds itself in quite the pickle without a new host to feed on (look out earth).
Umm already the ipod allows you to store un-DRMed music on it, so why would .001% using pirated radio really make them change anything when probably more than 50% of ipod owners already have copyrighted music which they downloaded off P2P on there anyway? Its not like this little gem is bigger than that hope diamond.
This is only valid for 64bit applications. The parent was talking about 32 bit applications being run on the 64bit architechture. They don't take advantage of the increased register size so what again is your point?
Nice to see you mention title 17. Since you are so familiar with it I am surprized you don't know about some common exemptions present in chapter motherfucking ONE of that title:
110. Limitations on exclusive rights: Exemption of certain performances and displays
(5)
(A) except as provided in subparagraph (B), communication of a transmission embodying a performance or display of a work by the public reception of the transmission on a single receiving apparatus of a kind commonly used in private homes, unless--
(i) a direct charge is made to see or hear the transmission; or
(ii) the transmission thus received is further transmitted to the public;
Read my clarification for a little better analogy to software EULAs. I didn't go into enough detail to show what I was really getting at in my original post.
A little clarification: Imagine if you bought a CD, payed with cash, as you walked out the door you were forced to sign the contract or they smashed your CD and you were not allowed a return.
You don't get to read the EULA before you have already purchased the software and many stores will NOT take back opened software. I see some lawsuits coming against said stores if this appeal doesn't work out. Imagine if when you bought a music CD you had to sign a contract saying you wouldn't allow anyone but yourself to hear any time you played it.
We are talking "unauthorized" by the author, not by the government. Basically the argument arose because the poster made a statement which did not take public domain into account. You're going back and trying to defend the poster's statement on a technicallity when infact the post which you are responding to attacked the poster by bringing up the same technicallity. He didn't mention that Shakespeare was in the public domain explicitly but believe me: that was his whole point. Please join the conversation at any time.
Well even if you really did know the difference there's no need to didn't did not did away with didn't done did done defensive about the mistake which you made. Your mistake; my mistake. Difference to be learned. Don't try and done did but try not didn't come around and try and turn this on me.
"In the last 4 years in America the number of billionares has increased and at the same time poverty has steadiliy increased!" Wow, talk about the percentages of the two and you may have a point. You do realize that the population has increased as well, no?
There is a difference between "the public Internet" and "the World Wide Web." Learn it.
"hey, let's face facts. anyone who has no qualms about distributing crackz and warez and copyrighted items would certainly have none about distributing *really* bad stuff. perhaps it's not just the software at fault." You are telling me my mother who downloaded a Beegees album yesterday and probably subsequently shared it would have no qualms about distributing "*really* bad stuff?" I might buy it if you left off the asterisks, why did you have to go and leave them in? Why... WHY?
Hate to burst your bubble but when talking about the resolution in print you talk about how many dots per inch it can do. These "dots" can't vary in strength. The "dots" on a monitor can. It takes a lot higher resolution in print to meet the quality provided by the equivilant resolution on a monitor. Clear enough?