Nope standard Federal Tax law that allows for the movement of revenues. Most states that have taxes higher than 0% are having the same issue right now where multi-state companies are moving the revenues out of state to avoid taxes.
I'll make it easy, the reason it's done is the entire tax burden for a corp registering it's revenues solely in Nevada is total tax on them regardless of how many or how little revenue there is is exactly $200. The reason in Washington Law your looking for is that the tax burden will be greater than $200.
It's simply a play to avoid taxes in Washington State while still taking advantage of the services Washington State offers.
Well that and Nevada doesn't have an information sharing agreement with the IRS so they're completely out of the loop on how much tax you actual owe based on your revenues. It helps on avoiding Federal taxes as well.
You are correct. I was confusing FX!32 with WoW64 on Itanium which does do instruction translation to let x86 programs run on the Itanium arch. My bad.
The WOW64 subsystem in Windows x64 for running 32-bit programs in 64-bit Windows is actually based on the older WOW system that let Windows on Alpha run x86 programs without recompling. Windows on Alpha didn't suffer from lack of programs, it suffered from being really, really expensive.
And yes, any vendor wants compatiblitiy with what they already have. It's easier to maximize profits if you can externalize the costs of upgrades on others instead of having to spend R&D money yourself.
Then they call the collection agency for their $100 dollars. And they'll drag you through the fight for years. Sure, you can counter sue, but they'll still win (and it'll still cost you way more than $100 dollars).
They'll get the full amount regardless of how cute you are with editing the bills.
Other than when you use iTunes for downloading Songs or Apps there is no Apple infrastructure for the iPhone. (Visual Voicemail is a AT&T service and not part of Apple).
Safari pulls the entire page down each time, just like Safari on the Mac. Thats part of the reason why it uses so much more bandwidth than the other phones.
Except for the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 changed the rules that the noted cases were decided on. It's much, much easier for a Registered Trademark holder to prove dilution and it's much easier to claim a mark is "well-known" and extend it's use into other areas outside the original trade mark.
The question is how much of that R&D is on real R&D and how much is on is spent on Viagra II, now lasting 4.5 hours instead of 4. Most it of it would be in the later category. They simply never break down those categories. (Also how much is in non-medicial R&D spending, packaging, etc). Also, how much of the spending is finding other uses for drugs that already exist? None of this is answered by a 10-K filing.
No major work ever comes out of Big Pharma R&D. All the important work is publicly funded.
The same report also indicates that they spend almost 3.3 billion dollars in just marketing in the same period.
That's why the copyright extension is so silly. Even if the first Mickey Mouse movie came out of copyright no one could make a movie with Mickey Mouse but Disney because Disney would bury them so deep in a Trademark infringement lawsuit (which the would be movie maker would lose very, very expensively).
At the cost of $200 million it was most likely developed by NIH grants to universities that Big Phrama attached to after there was some promise. The big secret of the pharmaceutical industry is that almost no money is spent on R&D it's all spent to make the treatments about to come out of patent protection just slightly better so they re-patent the and then spend a truck load of money on marketing to burry the old drug in the mind of the companies and the doctors.
If they spent about 1% of their current marketing budget on R&D the array of drugs would be so, so much better.
Well that usually because if the partition tables are different youy've probably blown away the recovery partition on the Dell Hard Drive. It is not actually an unreasonable response for the recovery system to take.
Usually it's on purpose, but not for nefarious reasons. More likely it's because some RFID contractor\vendor got to the government person in the upper levels of charge and convinced them they need this feature in their IDs whether it's a good idea or not (it does help the previous vendor\contractors bottom line which is all that matters really). It then gets implemented regardless of any security conserns.
This disingenuous part of this argument is that they want Ireland's tax rate (12.5%) while ignoring the fact the in Ireland there is no such thing as a deduction. (I.e. You pay 12.5% no exceptions, deductions, accumulating write-offs etc). The real US rate is really not much higher when all the deductions/write-offs, etc are counted in the total taxes paid (especially for the largest companies which effectively pay no corporate taxes). Sadly the goal is to lower the US rate while leaving all the deductions/write-offs in place. There is nothing wrong with the Ireland system, but the lower tax rate is only viable if you remove all the deductions (which like Microsoft moving to Ireland will never happen).
The flat-taxers have the same goal, reduce all the rates to a lower level while leaving the really complex part the deductions in place (which would make the tax not really flat).
I thought Verizon couldn't use the iPhone because it's GSM and Verizon uses CDMA. There isn't a CDMA version marketed anywhere in the world, they're all GSM. The only options in the US are AT&T and T-Mobile, any bid from any of the other companies would pretty much require them to front the cost of making a CDMA version of the phone since it'd only sell in the US.
Things like help desk (cause people need to call when things break), contracting services (cause someone needs to fix the broken data lines), ERP (cause workers need to get paid), accounting services (so investors know whats going on), etc are always listed as costs to the operation and not listed as costs to individual projects. An investor who the 10k is written for would understand this. You cannot really tell anything about a company from a 10k.
Someone reading it off the web would not. It's written in a combination of legalese and accountingese so it's a little dense.
That is true only the most simplistic analysis and incorrect. The costs don't include any of the costs of discharging the debt incured on building the network. It also doesn't include the costs that would be applied to general cable usage that share the same communication system or any labor and tax costs that are incurred running the either system. It's just a subtraction of two lines (total data revenue and direct data costs) in the 10-K form and the "implication" that the result is 4 billion in pure profit.
While they're making money, 4 billion they are not. At that profit rate the market would be flooding with other competators who would undercut them (see cell phones).
If your business model isn't making you money; you need a different business model. Changing the laws to support them only delays the inevitable. The problem with newspapers is that they failed to get with the program until way, way after their main source of income (commerical ads and classified ads) were eaten by the Internet. They're response has been to cut the local news staff and local stories and outsource it to a central office which is why their suffering so much. Covering local stuff was the one thing people read the paper for. Why pay for something that is posted everywhere else on the wires and identical to what's on the TV?
Computer technology has come along quite a bit. A lot of the things that were done by hand when Futurama was on Fox were automated for the DVDs. That and they dropped the full orcharstra for an all make believe band.
The issue is while the other products have defined and well used laws for product liablitiy, software does not. In fact the industry rejects and attempt to institute any sort of liablity procedures for them. As such, there would be a legal recourse for the owner of a house if the flaws in construction caused them to lose money or have loss of life, if software caused the issue there would be no legal recourse. Flaws in houses and cars tend to be minor things (paint chips, trim, etc), since the threat of real liablitiy cause the major ones (like safety) to disappear. In software the "minor" things are usually buried by the vast number of major things that the software manufacturers don't fix since it's not in their best intrest to do so, since really who will sue.
It was a situtation setup when the software industry was a immature field in order not to crush it before it began, but has never been redone once it became mature and it also became clear that there should be and must be due diligence on people writing software.
When this was started it was noted in official White House policy that these email accounts will be archived with the rest of the official White House email. The issue with the previous administration was that they were using RNC accounts precisely because they wouldn't be archived and therefore can remain hidden from the press and future historians trying to delve into what made the Bush White House tick.
It's the archiving that is the problem, not the private mail service.
I think they're just enabling MD5 on the BGP sessions. It's already specified in RFC 2385 - Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature Option. It's basically a $600k program to manage the logistics of turing this on. I do give props for Network World for making a mundane task 5 whole pages.
Slashdot Mirror
Nope standard Federal Tax law that allows for the movement of revenues. Most states that have taxes higher than 0% are having the same issue right now where multi-state companies are moving the revenues out of state to avoid taxes.
I'll make it easy, the reason it's done is the entire tax burden for a corp registering it's revenues solely in Nevada is total tax on them regardless of how many or how little revenue there is is exactly $200. The reason in Washington Law your looking for is that the tax burden will be greater than $200.
It's simply a play to avoid taxes in Washington State while still taking advantage of the services Washington State offers.
Well that and Nevada doesn't have an information sharing agreement with the IRS so they're completely out of the loop on how much tax you actual owe based on your revenues. It helps on avoiding Federal taxes as well.
You are correct. I was confusing FX!32 with WoW64 on Itanium which does do instruction translation to let x86 programs run on the Itanium arch. My bad.
The WOW64 subsystem in Windows x64 for running 32-bit programs in 64-bit Windows is actually based on the older WOW system that let Windows on Alpha run x86 programs without recompling. Windows on Alpha didn't suffer from lack of programs, it suffered from being really, really expensive.
And yes, any vendor wants compatiblitiy with what they already have. It's easier to maximize profits if you can externalize the costs of upgrades on others instead of having to spend R&D money yourself.
Then they call the collection agency for their $100 dollars. And they'll drag you through the fight for years. Sure, you can counter sue, but they'll still win (and it'll still cost you way more than $100 dollars).
They'll get the full amount regardless of how cute you are with editing the bills.
Other than when you use iTunes for downloading Songs or Apps there is no Apple infrastructure for the iPhone. (Visual Voicemail is a AT&T service and not part of Apple).
Safari pulls the entire page down each time, just like Safari on the Mac. Thats part of the reason why it uses so much more bandwidth than the other phones.
Except for the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 changed the rules that the noted cases were decided on. It's much, much easier for a Registered Trademark holder to prove dilution and it's much easier to claim a mark is "well-known" and extend it's use into other areas outside the original trade mark.
The question is how much of that R&D is on real R&D and how much is on is spent on Viagra II, now lasting 4.5 hours instead of 4. Most it of it would be in the later category. They simply never break down those categories. (Also how much is in non-medicial R&D spending, packaging, etc). Also, how much of the spending is finding other uses for drugs that already exist? None of this is answered by a 10-K filing.
No major work ever comes out of Big Pharma R&D. All the important work is publicly funded.
The same report also indicates that they spend almost 3.3 billion dollars in just marketing in the same period.
Yea. Let's call it a "Trademark".
That's why the copyright extension is so silly. Even if the first Mickey Mouse movie came out of copyright no one could make a movie with Mickey Mouse but Disney because Disney would bury them so deep in a Trademark infringement lawsuit (which the would be movie maker would lose very, very expensively).
At the cost of $200 million it was most likely developed by NIH grants to universities that Big Phrama attached to after there was some promise. The big secret of the pharmaceutical industry is that almost no money is spent on R&D it's all spent to make the treatments about to come out of patent protection just slightly better so they re-patent the and then spend a truck load of money on marketing to burry the old drug in the mind of the companies and the doctors.
If they spent about 1% of their current marketing budget on R&D the array of drugs would be so, so much better.
Please see Jumpgate Evolution instead then.
Well that usually because if the partition tables are different youy've probably blown away the recovery partition on the Dell Hard Drive. It is not actually an unreasonable response for the recovery system to take.
Usually it's on purpose, but not for nefarious reasons. More likely it's because some RFID contractor\vendor got to the government person in the upper levels of charge and convinced them they need this feature in their IDs whether it's a good idea or not (it does help the previous vendor\contractors bottom line which is all that matters really). It then gets implemented regardless of any security conserns.
Or they'd rather just have you use the already included Wordpad that does handle new lines correctly.
This disingenuous part of this argument is that they want Ireland's tax rate (12.5%) while ignoring the fact the in Ireland there is no such thing as a deduction. (I.e. You pay 12.5% no exceptions, deductions, accumulating write-offs etc). The real US rate is really not much higher when all the deductions/write-offs, etc are counted in the total taxes paid (especially for the largest companies which effectively pay no corporate taxes). Sadly the goal is to lower the US rate while leaving all the deductions/write-offs in place. There is nothing wrong with the Ireland system, but the lower tax rate is only viable if you remove all the deductions (which like Microsoft moving to Ireland will never happen).
The flat-taxers have the same goal, reduce all the rates to a lower level while leaving the really complex part the deductions in place (which would make the tax not really flat).
And Sprint.
I thought Verizon couldn't use the iPhone because it's GSM and Verizon uses CDMA. There isn't a CDMA version marketed anywhere in the world, they're all GSM. The only options in the US are AT&T and T-Mobile, any bid from any of the other companies would pretty much require them to front the cost of making a CDMA version of the phone since it'd only sell in the US.
Things like help desk (cause people need to call when things break), contracting services (cause someone needs to fix the broken data lines), ERP (cause workers need to get paid), accounting services (so investors know whats going on), etc are always listed as costs to the operation and not listed as costs to individual projects. An investor who the 10k is written for would understand this. You cannot really tell anything about a company from a 10k.
Someone reading it off the web would not. It's written in a combination of legalese and accountingese so it's a little dense.
That is true only the most simplistic analysis and incorrect. The costs don't include any of the costs of discharging the debt incured on building the network. It also doesn't include the costs that would be applied to general cable usage that share the same communication system or any labor and tax costs that are incurred running the either system. It's just a subtraction of two lines (total data revenue and direct data costs) in the 10-K form and the "implication" that the result is 4 billion in pure profit.
While they're making money, 4 billion they are not. At that profit rate the market would be flooding with other competators who would undercut them (see cell phones).
If your business model isn't making you money; you need a different business model. Changing the laws to support them only delays the inevitable. The problem with newspapers is that they failed to get with the program until way, way after their main source of income (commerical ads and classified ads) were eaten by the Internet. They're response has been to cut the local news staff and local stories and outsource it to a central office which is why their suffering so much. Covering local stuff was the one thing people read the paper for. Why pay for something that is posted everywhere else on the wires and identical to what's on the TV?
Because they already used Virtual Boy to much success so they're kind of limited on the names they left to use.
Computer technology has come along quite a bit. A lot of the things that were done by hand when Futurama was on Fox were automated for the DVDs. That and they dropped the full orcharstra for an all make believe band.
The issue is while the other products have defined and well used laws for product liablitiy, software does not. In fact the industry rejects and attempt to institute any sort of liablity procedures for them. As such, there would be a legal recourse for the owner of a house if the flaws in construction caused them to lose money or have loss of life, if software caused the issue there would be no legal recourse. Flaws in houses and cars tend to be minor things (paint chips, trim, etc), since the threat of real liablitiy cause the major ones (like safety) to disappear. In software the "minor" things are usually buried by the vast number of major things that the software manufacturers don't fix since it's not in their best intrest to do so, since really who will sue.
It was a situtation setup when the software industry was a immature field in order not to crush it before it began, but has never been redone once it became mature and it also became clear that there should be and must be due diligence on people writing software.
When this was started it was noted in official White House policy that these email accounts will be archived with the rest of the official White House email. The issue with the previous administration was that they were using RNC accounts precisely because they wouldn't be archived and therefore can remain hidden from the press and future historians trying to delve into what made the Bush White House tick.
It's the archiving that is the problem, not the private mail service.
I think they're just enabling MD5 on the BGP sessions. It's already specified in RFC 2385 - Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature Option. It's basically a $600k program to manage the logistics of turing this on. I do give props for Network World for making a mundane task 5 whole pages.