Also, note that heavy exercise depresses the immune system, which makes you more likely to get the flu once exposed. (Exercise is still worth it for all the other benefits it gives you.)
You might do well by not exercising for the week after getting the flu shot -- it takes a week or two before the immunization takes hold. But it doesn't sound as if this would have helped in your case.
As a liberal, I just want to help you out, here. Of the items you list, most liberals count 1, 2, 3, and 4 as *good* things. 5 is just plain wrong -- absent the TARP plan, Obama's spending is below Bush levels. 9 is not his fault -- we *did* go through a terrible economic collapse that we are still digging out from underneath. 6 and 7 are just opinions, and sound a lot like paranoid ravings.
Do you have any real criticisms of Obama's tenure? Hint: I'd start with the 'drone attacks on American citizens' angle. But even on that he's not as bad as Bush.
Governments involved in clandestine assassinations against their own citizens is a fairly rare and outrageous event in a democracy, I assure you.
I'd think it would be easier to issue a presidential edict saying that anyone who swears allegiance to Al Qaeda also renounces their American citizenship. Then you can kill them as foreign enemies without compunction. I don't know why they'd go to all this trouble to justify killing Americans, unless they wanted the ability to do it on a larger scale.
I'd cast Brian Cranston as Darth Vader. He used to be a cool dad, but then he lost his hair in a terrible meth-making accident and became very, very scary.
Everyone's talking about re-creating famous species like the Woolly Mammoth, Tazmanian Devil, and dinosaurs. Are there any efforts that you have heard of to re-create lesser-known extinct species? Is anyone trying to recreate the Dodo (for food)? Glyptodon (as a pack animal)? The Giant Sloth (for fun)?
Not sure how related they are to a 'gyroscope ball', but I used Chinese Medicine Balls to cure carpal tunnel some years back. The doctor suggested them. Rotating two balls in the palm of my hand -- first in one direction, then the other -- stretched and toned the muscles to the point where my hands were strong enough to type as much as I needed them to.
I'm not sure how useful they are as immediate pain relief, but I'm sure there are many exercises that help you build long-term strength and stability in your wrists and hands. Chinese medicine balls are one such exercise. I wouldn't be surprised if Gyroscope balls serve the same purpose.
I think you're missing the possibilities of asymmetric warfare. The government can throw billion-dollar drones made out of titanium at criminals who are fighting back with ten-dollar drones made out of plastic. The government will win almost every battle, but they will lose the war. The criminals will bleed them bankrupt.
That's not even considering the possibility that a criminal might be smarter or more innovative than the government, and create something that blindsides law enforcement. Example -- flying drones are illegal, but has the law considered miniature car drones? How about spoofed objects; if you replace a street sign with a 3D printed replicate filled with malevolent automation (such as a RFID scanner), how long would it take the authorities to notice? The asymmetric warfare possibilities are endless and all stack the deck against the government.
The difference here is that the law traces the provenance of illegal objects, and tries to interrupt them at every part of the chain: The inventor, the creator, the middleman/seller, and then the user. Machine shops are rare, expensive, and known. (Are they licensed?) Cops can stop a machine shop by shutting down the business it belongs to. They can stop a reseller. The hardest thing to do is stop the person who intends to use the illegal object. But domestic 3D printing makes all of those the same person. This is a serious complication for law enforcement.
Once we start printing magazines, what's to stop us from printing mortars? Flack? Anti-aircraft tubes and targeting? The only limitation is the explosive component, and the printers will manage to do that eventually. Hell, the 3D printers could make drones of their own.
If it comes down to a war between technologies, the side with the 3D printers will always win, because the printers have no theoretical limit. All you need is ingenuity, which will come with time. You'd have to use your drones to preemptively destroy all 3D printers because of what they *might* be used to do, and that will lead to revolution.
I'm fascinated by what will happen when 3D printing manages to create its first illegal object. I don't think they've printed anything illegal yet, have they?
What will happen when they do? Authorities will have to crack down on 3D printing patterns, which will be impossible. Or perhaps the law (all laws?) will be rewritten so that possession of the object is illegal but possession of the digital design is permitted...which will make monitoring of 3D printer usage mandatory. This upcoming clash between object legality and post-scarcity technology will make the copyright wars look like a kindergarten brawl.
“Scientists have calculated that the chances of something so patently absurd actually existing are millions to one. But magicians have calculated that million-to-one chances crop up nine times out of ten.”
Terry Pratchett, Mort
So the internet has made Pratchett's rule a reality. Now all I want it to do is give us giant turtles and ambulatory luggage.
Maybe I did something shameful and don't want it to be public?
This is the age of YouTube. Do people have shame anymore? Be logical -- the fame you get from posting your embarrassing video can be leveraged into money that might just cover your legal and/or medical expenses.
Not sure what 'twilight sedation' is. I was given a chemical that the doctor said would not put me to sleep but I wouldn't feel nor remember anything...and I didn't. That probably doesn't meet the technical definition of 'general anesthesia', but from my perspective I was out like a light.
Seeing wildfires from space is not unusual. All wildfires are visible from space, and we have several monitoring programs going on right now that use satellite imagery to track wildfire appearance and growth.
The most dramatic imagery I remember doing was the Rodeo-Chediski wildfires in 2002, which burned half a million acres (compared to the 50,000 acres burning in Australia so far, although they might get larger.) There are also a few good pics from the Alaskan wildfires in 2004, which burned 6.6 million acres. That was such a large-scale disaster that it was almost too big for the satellites to view; smoke obscured almost the entire state.
The bad news for Australia is that the climate is getting hotter. The good news is that there ain't a whole lot in central Australia to burn.
Just as a note, I had an upper GI tract study done with barium sulfate about fifteen years ago to diagnose a hiatal hernia. They showed me a clear X-ray video of my swallowing and the pouch in front of my stomach that was causing my reflux and pain. For such a simple test, it's a great visualizer of stomach problems.
(The next two bowel movements I had were literally like lead bricks. If you want to mine more barium, I'd say check the sewers.)
I expect that without barium sulfate, the upper GI study will be replaced by endoscopy, where they put a camera on a tube down your throat to video the stomach from the inside. I've had that procedure done also. It's more invasive, more expensive, and requires general anesthetic.
If the top 1% earns 40% of the countries income, they are going to need to pay 40% of the taxes.
Ummm, you know that the top 1% contributes more than 35% of taxes already, right?
If we want to keep spending like crazy monkeys then we need to tax everyone like crazy monkeys.
If they make 40% and are taxed 35%, that's not enough. You know that the top 1% own more than 90% of the wealth in this country, right?
A fair tax system would tax based on wealth, not income. Because if the system is just a little regressive, just a little biased in favor of the rich, there will be a gradual process that distributes all the wealth to the top. That's what's been happening and it's not healthy for our economy. Now the poor need their entitlements just to survive, and the rich are hanging on to their ill-gotten gains like a dragon's horde.
If you redistribute that wealth we won't have to spend like crazy monkeys because people will make enough honest wages to survive on their own. It's the greed of the rich that is the problem here.
Correct me if I'm wrong -- I'm not a web developer -- but aren't Perl, Python, and Ruby all run on the server-side? There's a need for client-side implementation, and Javascript is it. (The only alternative I'm aware of is ActiveX, of which the less said the better.)
I'll second this nomination. JL8 is a fantastic 'newspaper format' comic. It's a shame he was forced to change the name (it used to be 'Little League').
Windows 8 is now about giving each application your full attention
But I don't work that way. Does anyone?
When I'm writing, I have my draft in one window, my notes in another, and a browser open so I can research. When I program I have one window for the editor and one in a shell ready to compile and run. When I work with spreadsheets it's rarely one sheet at a time, and usually I'm getting the numbers from a shell or browser window. About the only applications I use on their own are games. I need multiple document windows for almost every productive task. It sounds as if Metro disables this basic, necessary work environment. I just can't see myself ever using that part of the OS.
If I'm not ever, ever going to use Metro, why would I want Windows 8?
Third, I've known gamers to pry off their Windows keys or buy Windows key-less keyboards because accidentally pressing the Windows key while reaching for Ctrl or Alt or Z during a full-screen game makes certain games fail.
This. I've pried the Windows key off my keyboard because it breaks out of games and it's inconveniently located between two keys that games use often. I can get a new keyboard, but I'd rather just stick with an OS that works the way I want it to.
Slashdot Mirror
Also, note that heavy exercise depresses the immune system, which makes you more likely to get the flu once exposed. (Exercise is still worth it for all the other benefits it gives you.)
You might do well by not exercising for the week after getting the flu shot -- it takes a week or two before the immunization takes hold. But it doesn't sound as if this would have helped in your case.
Ideas like Skynet.
As a liberal, I just want to help you out, here. Of the items you list, most liberals count 1, 2, 3, and 4 as *good* things. 5 is just plain wrong -- absent the TARP plan, Obama's spending is below Bush levels. 9 is not his fault -- we *did* go through a terrible economic collapse that we are still digging out from underneath. 6 and 7 are just opinions, and sound a lot like paranoid ravings.
Do you have any real criticisms of Obama's tenure? Hint: I'd start with the 'drone attacks on American citizens' angle. But even on that he's not as bad as Bush.
Governments involved in clandestine assassinations against their own citizens is a fairly rare and outrageous event in a democracy, I assure you.
I'd think it would be easier to issue a presidential edict saying that anyone who swears allegiance to Al Qaeda also renounces their American citizenship. Then you can kill them as foreign enemies without compunction. I don't know why they'd go to all this trouble to justify killing Americans, unless they wanted the ability to do it on a larger scale.
JavaScript is the programming language of a Gnome programmer; an elegant language for a more civilized age.
But hokey nonstandard libraries and ancient browser syntaxes are no match for a good object class at your side, kid.
I am wary of Americans because they are known mass murderes...
If you were inviting me into your house and I had a gun, you would be perfectly reasonable to be wary.
In this case we're inviting Chinese software into our computers. Wariness is still recommended.
I'd cast Brian Cranston as Darth Vader. He used to be a cool dad, but then he lost his hair in a terrible meth-making accident and became very, very scary.
Everyone's talking about re-creating famous species like the Woolly Mammoth, Tazmanian Devil, and dinosaurs. Are there any efforts that you have heard of to re-create lesser-known extinct species? Is anyone trying to recreate the Dodo (for food)? Glyptodon (as a pack animal)? The Giant Sloth (for fun)?
Not sure how related they are to a 'gyroscope ball', but I used Chinese Medicine Balls to cure carpal tunnel some years back. The doctor suggested them. Rotating two balls in the palm of my hand -- first in one direction, then the other -- stretched and toned the muscles to the point where my hands were strong enough to type as much as I needed them to.
I'm not sure how useful they are as immediate pain relief, but I'm sure there are many exercises that help you build long-term strength and stability in your wrists and hands. Chinese medicine balls are one such exercise. I wouldn't be surprised if Gyroscope balls serve the same purpose.
I think you're missing the possibilities of asymmetric warfare. The government can throw billion-dollar drones made out of titanium at criminals who are fighting back with ten-dollar drones made out of plastic. The government will win almost every battle, but they will lose the war. The criminals will bleed them bankrupt.
That's not even considering the possibility that a criminal might be smarter or more innovative than the government, and create something that blindsides law enforcement. Example -- flying drones are illegal, but has the law considered miniature car drones? How about spoofed objects; if you replace a street sign with a 3D printed replicate filled with malevolent automation (such as a RFID scanner), how long would it take the authorities to notice? The asymmetric warfare possibilities are endless and all stack the deck against the government.
The difference here is that the law traces the provenance of illegal objects, and tries to interrupt them at every part of the chain: The inventor, the creator, the middleman/seller, and then the user. Machine shops are rare, expensive, and known. (Are they licensed?) Cops can stop a machine shop by shutting down the business it belongs to. They can stop a reseller. The hardest thing to do is stop the person who intends to use the illegal object. But domestic 3D printing makes all of those the same person. This is a serious complication for law enforcement.
Once we start printing magazines, what's to stop us from printing mortars? Flack? Anti-aircraft tubes and targeting? The only limitation is the explosive component, and the printers will manage to do that eventually. Hell, the 3D printers could make drones of their own.
If it comes down to a war between technologies, the side with the 3D printers will always win, because the printers have no theoretical limit. All you need is ingenuity, which will come with time. You'd have to use your drones to preemptively destroy all 3D printers because of what they *might* be used to do, and that will lead to revolution.
Putting the gun debate aside for a moment...
I'm fascinated by what will happen when 3D printing manages to create its first illegal object. I don't think they've printed anything illegal yet, have they?
What will happen when they do? Authorities will have to crack down on 3D printing patterns, which will be impossible. Or perhaps the law (all laws?) will be rewritten so that possession of the object is illegal but possession of the digital design is permitted...which will make monitoring of 3D printer usage mandatory. This upcoming clash between object legality and post-scarcity technology will make the copyright wars look like a kindergarten brawl.
“Scientists have calculated that the chances of something so patently absurd actually existing are millions to one.
But magicians have calculated that million-to-one chances crop up nine times out of ten.”
Terry Pratchett, Mort
So the internet has made Pratchett's rule a reality. Now all I want it to do is give us giant turtles and ambulatory luggage.
Maybe painting them pink would help reduce the number of gun fatalities ?
This suggestion is invalid. Oh, so invalid. Just the weapons of death with pony themes will number in the thousands...
Gotcha. But note that I was fully awake during the barium sulfate procedure, and walked out of the doctor's office under my own power.
Maybe I did something shameful and don't want it to be public?
This is the age of YouTube. Do people have shame anymore? Be logical -- the fame you get from posting your embarrassing video can be leveraged into money that might just cover your legal and/or medical expenses.
Not sure what 'twilight sedation' is. I was given a chemical that the doctor said would not put me to sleep but I wouldn't feel nor remember anything...and I didn't. That probably doesn't meet the technical definition of 'general anesthesia', but from my perspective I was out like a light.
Seeing wildfires from space is not unusual. All wildfires are visible from space, and we have several monitoring programs going on right now that use satellite imagery to track wildfire appearance and growth.
The most dramatic imagery I remember doing was the Rodeo-Chediski wildfires in 2002, which burned half a million acres (compared to the 50,000 acres burning in Australia so far, although they might get larger.) There are also a few good pics from the Alaskan wildfires in 2004, which burned 6.6 million acres. That was such a large-scale disaster that it was almost too big for the satellites to view; smoke obscured almost the entire state.
The bad news for Australia is that the climate is getting hotter. The good news is that there ain't a whole lot in central Australia to burn.
Just as a note, I had an upper GI tract study done with barium sulfate about fifteen years ago to diagnose a hiatal hernia. They showed me a clear X-ray video of my swallowing and the pouch in front of my stomach that was causing my reflux and pain. For such a simple test, it's a great visualizer of stomach problems.
(The next two bowel movements I had were literally like lead bricks. If you want to mine more barium, I'd say check the sewers.)
I expect that without barium sulfate, the upper GI study will be replaced by endoscopy, where they put a camera on a tube down your throat to video the stomach from the inside. I've had that procedure done also. It's more invasive, more expensive, and requires general anesthetic.
Ummm, you know that the top 1% contributes more than 35% of taxes already, right?
If we want to keep spending like crazy monkeys then we need to tax everyone like crazy monkeys.
If they make 40% and are taxed 35%, that's not enough. You know that the top 1% own more than 90% of the wealth in this country, right?
A fair tax system would tax based on wealth, not income. Because if the system is just a little regressive, just a little biased in favor of the rich, there will be a gradual process that distributes all the wealth to the top. That's what's been happening and it's not healthy for our economy. Now the poor need their entitlements just to survive, and the rich are hanging on to their ill-gotten gains like a dragon's horde.
If you redistribute that wealth we won't have to spend like crazy monkeys because people will make enough honest wages to survive on their own. It's the greed of the rich that is the problem here.
Correct me if I'm wrong -- I'm not a web developer -- but aren't Perl, Python, and Ruby all run on the server-side? There's a need for client-side implementation, and Javascript is it. (The only alternative I'm aware of is ActiveX, of which the less said the better.)
I'll second this nomination. JL8 is a fantastic 'newspaper format' comic. It's a shame he was forced to change the name (it used to be 'Little League').
Windows 8 is now about giving each application your full attention
But I don't work that way. Does anyone?
When I'm writing, I have my draft in one window, my notes in another, and a browser open so I can research. When I program I have one window for the editor and one in a shell ready to compile and run. When I work with spreadsheets it's rarely one sheet at a time, and usually I'm getting the numbers from a shell or browser window. About the only applications I use on their own are games. I need multiple document windows for almost every productive task. It sounds as if Metro disables this basic, necessary work environment. I just can't see myself ever using that part of the OS.
If I'm not ever, ever going to use Metro, why would I want Windows 8?
Third, I've known gamers to pry off their Windows keys or buy Windows key-less keyboards because accidentally pressing the Windows key while reaching for Ctrl or Alt or Z during a full-screen game makes certain games fail.
This. I've pried the Windows key off my keyboard because it breaks out of games and it's inconveniently located between two keys that games use often. I can get a new keyboard, but I'd rather just stick with an OS that works the way I want it to.