So what? The whole medallion deal serves to create an artificial scarcity. Once there are no jobs to protect there'll be millions of these on the roads. I can't wait until I no longer need to own and drive a car.
And typically before putting it on, I'd think, so the wearing of the watch seems more dictated by the perceived delicateness of the device. Just my speculation, though. I don't know the answer.
Neither the fashion or automotive industries have copyright or design patents
That's why the fashion industry started plastering their name on everything, to be able to claim trademark infringement. Now it's ubiquitous and everyone is a walking billboard.
Someone having a general idea does not constitute prior art. By that measure almost nothing would be patentable. (I'm not saying that would necessarily be a bad thing.)
There's a 100% chance that his actions would be primarily motivated by what most benefits Donald Trump. Any benefit to the public would be entirely incidental.
Making the public happy would benefit Trump, as he well knows that there's a lot of money and power in being well-liked. As he won't have much traditional political power he will rely on the perceived ability to turn that public against his enemies.
br Makes it sound like they've been declining for several years.
You're taking it wrong. Y/Y means the same quarter of a year ago, rather than the previous quarter. The reason for doing this is to remove seasonal biases from the comparison.
I'm sure there are people who require a 100% return in just three years. But most of world would be knocking people down to get a 100% return in four or even eight.
Given that I now have a permanent injury to my foot because a cab driver was a no show for 2 fucking hours and I had to walk home
Were you walking on broken glass? Normally walking two or three miles is uneventful. If some freak accident occurred, well, that's just bad luck. That same bad luck could have happened the other way around if, say, the taxi got in a collision.
Slashdot Mirror
It's when you get screwed over five different ways.
So what? The whole medallion deal serves to create an artificial scarcity. Once there are no jobs to protect there'll be millions of these on the roads. I can't wait until I no longer need to own and drive a car.
It won't be long until it's the other way around - only a fool would ride with a human driver.
He also claimed that the deal was made in contravention of existing EU treaties and laws, despite the fact that the EU itself did not even exist.
There is a point implied in the statement. Sorry I didn't spell it out for you.
It's difficult to mount a proper defense years after the event. The Statute addresses that as well for all but the most serious of crimes.
That strategy works right up until it doesn't. Because sometimes the fearful ones are right.
And typically before putting it on, I'd think, so the wearing of the watch seems more dictated by the perceived delicateness of the device. Just my speculation, though. I don't know the answer.
No worries, this is Slashdot. This is anti-social media.
They have those, but they call them "phones".
I always figured it was to reduce the chance of damage and keep it out of the way, but I don't know that. Winding is/was infrequent, wasn't it?
or food, medicine, education, etc. The car problem is solving itself.
And brandishing.
That's why the fashion industry started plastering their name on everything, to be able to claim trademark infringement. Now it's ubiquitous and everyone is a walking billboard.
They do. But it's like that whack-a-mole game, and sometimes the mole wins.
Someone having a general idea does not constitute prior art. By that measure almost nothing would be patentable. (I'm not saying that would necessarily be a bad thing.)
You are easily awed.
And what is this "expert" thing? Expert how? More like Captain Obvious says...
Making the public happy would benefit Trump, as he well knows that there's a lot of money and power in being well-liked. As he won't have much traditional political power he will rely on the perceived ability to turn that public against his enemies.
You're taking it wrong. Y/Y means the same quarter of a year ago, rather than the previous quarter. The reason for doing this is to remove seasonal biases from the comparison.
I'm sure there are people who require a 100% return in just three years. But most of world would be knocking people down to get a 100% return in four or even eight.
You have a billionaire wife?
Were you walking on broken glass? Normally walking two or three miles is uneventful. If some freak accident occurred, well, that's just bad luck. That same bad luck could have happened the other way around if, say, the taxi got in a collision.
Four years to recoup a capital investment is beyond fantastic. Even double that, as will be more likely when everything is figured in, is really good.
That's been getting posted for years. It's its own joke. Here's one from 13 years ago with that same text line for line.