It is entirely possible that Google management didn't approach the engineering staff with a plan to build a Death Star or Soul Sucker. The very core of their business is to collect data. The decision to use some of that data for evil/greedy purposes doesn't require additional capability - just additional restraint.
[not affiliated with Alphabet/Google]
I agree with what you are saying but... I don't trust motorists to stop when I enter a crosswalk. It matters not one bit whether they are malicious or incompetent. Until they stop, I'm staying on the curb (verifying?).
"Trust but verify" is just an odd way to say, "don't trust." That said, it is almost always a good idea to verify. The idea expressed by GP poster that distrust can't be taught would seem to fly in the face of any security training, anywhere. In training to be a military trainer, we were taught that attitudes can most definitely be taught. Then they taught us to hate liberals. JK: they taught us to hate whiners - who just happened to be liberals.
I think the mobile index is best suited for information consumers while the desktop index is better suited for information producers. I'm fine using the dumbshit index while on-the-go but I want real results when I'm working at the desktop.
Specifics on how exactly this is happening are unclear. Is the officer less confrontational to begin with, avoiding escalation? Or are suspects and complainants more wary of their conduct? Is it some combination of the two, or are even more factors involved? To determine these things would be a far more complex and subtle piece of research, but the study does suggest that officer behavior is probably the most affected, and that other effects flow from that.
Why not do the updates through the charging cable/station? That way, at least you know the vehicle isn't in use. If the vehicle is in use, it won't be long before it is connected again.
The politicians are afraid of being compared to Jimmy Carter's giving up the Panama Canal (designed, built and maintained by the US until 1999). The US didn't get any compensation for that act but, all-in-all, the canal still seem to be fulfilling its purpose - for the US and the rest of the world.
In my defective brain it is related. It sure seems like blaming the victim (like blaming a rape victim for the act of the rapist) when 17% of the IT staff gets laid off in a cost-cutting move. If they were poor-performing, why ask them to train their replacements?
I think TFA is saying that the shiny hardware doesn't do anything without the software. That makes the software pretty important. Yet, the software (and its maintenance) is barely mentioned in all the marketing fluff. That is the reported problem.
What if countries modified their patent and copyright laws so that if a holder moves their tax base out of a country, they forfeit their holder rights in that country?
...because a taxi without a passenger is still occupied by a human. An unoccupied autonomous uber car could be a tempting target for all those displaced taxi/uber drivers.
The card companies and banks don't give a shit about security. The chip-and-signature conversion enabled a huge liability shift. As I understand it, prior to the shift, the card companies/banks were liable for fraud committed with their cards. If fraud is committed now, the liability lies with the retailer.
Slashdot Mirror
It is entirely possible that Google management didn't approach the engineering staff with a plan to build a Death Star or Soul Sucker. The very core of their business is to collect data. The decision to use some of that data for evil/greedy purposes doesn't require additional capability - just additional restraint. [not affiliated with Alphabet/Google]
I was less concerned with what the AC said than with how it was said. Anonymous attacks on logged-in posters are just juvenile.
Aw, that's cute! The brave, little coward got all fired up and shit. You tell 'em, sweetie!
I agree with what you are saying but...
I don't trust motorists to stop when I enter a crosswalk. It matters not one bit whether they are malicious or incompetent. Until they stop, I'm staying on the curb (verifying?).
noun
1.
an attitude, disposition, or mood.
I trust your assertion that mindset and attitude are different.
Wouldn't plastic scissors (like they use in kindergarten) pass through a metal-detector?
"Trust but verify" is just an odd way to say, "don't trust." That said, it is almost always a good idea to verify.
The idea expressed by GP poster that distrust can't be taught would seem to fly in the face of any security training, anywhere.
In training to be a military trainer, we were taught that attitudes can most definitely be taught. Then they taught us to hate liberals. JK: they taught us to hate whiners - who just happened to be liberals.
I think the mobile index is best suited for information consumers while the desktop index is better suited for information producers.
I'm fine using the dumbshit index while on-the-go but I want real results when I'm working at the desktop.
Specifics on how exactly this is happening are unclear. Is the officer less confrontational to begin with, avoiding escalation? Or are suspects and complainants more wary of their conduct? Is it some combination of the two, or are even more factors involved? To determine these things would be a far more complex and subtle piece of research, but the study does suggest that officer behavior is probably the most affected, and that other effects flow from that.
Why not do the updates through the charging cable/station? That way, at least you know the vehicle isn't in use. If the vehicle is in use, it won't be long before it is connected again.
The politicians are afraid of being compared to Jimmy Carter's giving up the Panama Canal (designed, built and maintained by the US until 1999).
The US didn't get any compensation for that act but, all-in-all, the canal still seem to be fulfilling its purpose - for the US and the rest of the world.
In my defective brain it is related. It sure seems like blaming the victim (like blaming a rape victim for the act of the rapist) when 17% of the IT staff gets laid off in a cost-cutting move. If they were poor-performing, why ask them to train their replacements?
Yeah - and women get raped for dressing too provocatively.
I think TFA is saying that the shiny hardware doesn't do anything without the software. That makes the software pretty important. Yet, the software (and its maintenance) is barely mentioned in all the marketing fluff. That is the reported problem.
What if countries modified their patent and copyright laws so that if a holder moves their tax base out of a country, they forfeit their holder rights in that country?
I know I shouldn't laugh at this...so I didn't.
...it's about Mozilla - the maker of Firefox.
Since that is the case, who gives a rat's ass?
...because a taxi without a passenger is still occupied by a human. An unoccupied autonomous uber car could be a tempting target for all those displaced taxi/uber drivers.
Be careful for what you wish - VLC could end up an unusable POS like Unity.
CP/M Card in an Apple II+ let me run Wordstar! That was awesome.
I guess I'm just not grasping the commercial advantage of sending a roomba to the moon and leaving it there.
Cool story Bro. How much did you donate?
The card companies and banks don't give a shit about security. The chip-and-signature conversion enabled a huge liability shift. As I understand it, prior to the shift, the card companies/banks were liable for fraud committed with their cards. If fraud is committed now, the liability lies with the retailer.
That's CLEARLY the domain of American political parties!
Nothing says automotive excellence like "long-time Apple executive."