Conspiracy theory is hypothesis based on known fact, to be proved or disproved as conspiracy fact by gathering new evidence. For example, the UK is guilty of trafficking children on a pretext of protecting them, where the reality is that they are selling them for vast amounts of money. That's the conspiracy theory. The conspiracy fact is that this policy is enacted in Law (Children Act 1989, Children and Adoption Act 2002) and that local authorities have publicly admitted to it. Tinfoil Hat Conspiracy is that which is based on fantastical assumption or claim with no basis in reality or possibility. A TFHC could be me extending the above to say that children are abducted by black helicopters and entire neighbourhoods are subjected to chemical mindwipes after the fact. Utterly ridiculous, which if used in the claim would write the entire thing off as some crackpot loony-tunes fucking head case.
Except that's not the reality of the situation at all.
Judges are paid by the Local Authorities whose local jurisdiction they operate under. That's done through Legal Aid, which is controlled by the Local Authorities. Jurisdictions are defined by the areas served by the Local Authorities and the police who directly answer to them. Council Tax pays police salaries. It's right there on the itemised bill.
Ergo, the police are beholden to local authorities: they REFUSE to investigate criminal allegations against any member of a local authority staff. They REFUSE to arrest corrupt judges. The Crown Prosecution Service have on record a grand total of ZERO prosecutions ever or pending against serving judges. Judges REFUSE to jail police officers who demonstrably perjure themselves. I have ample anecdotal evidence of this (currently withheld from publication pending private criminal prosecutions against named judges), there is also plenty of evidence in the remarkable absence of stories in the mainstream media of serving police officers being jailed for criminal activity and a grand total of ZERO serving police officers EVER having been convicted and jailed for causing a wrongful death (even though there are several videos of police officers actually committing acts which directly resulted in death). They all piss in the same pot.
no, retroactive censorship does exist - in most democracies, actually. Prime example is the Hansard record, where entire debates have been erased on Tony Blair and Gordon Brown's watches in attempts to hide their criminality. Fortunately some of us have eidetic memories and reliable means of caching web content.
Ashford v Thornton was after the Declaration of Independence by some margin, and no other challenge to the right of trial by combat appears on the United States judicial record. The ONLY theoretical hurdle to TBC is the UN Declaration on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to which the United States is signatory by virtue of its permanent position on the UN Security Council.
got 3200+ more for you: that they've admitted to, is the number of children abducted from foreign nationals and subsequently trafficked between 2007-2012.
This is the UK I'm talking about, not some Middle East shithole.
Threatening to hit someone when you're in person is assault.
Let me stop you right there. It's not assault, it's affray and fear or provocation of violence under the Public Order Act 1986 section 3(1) and 4(1). Cyberstalking would be covered under section 4A of the same Act (under hte heading "Intentional harassment, alarm or distress").
consider the fact that more and more prisons are finding their way into private hands. then ask again. And answer: full prisons earn money. Just like hotels, empty cells don't earn anything.
a windjammer* is a vessel designed to take full advantage of every bit of wind energy it can capture and put it into forward motion using the largest sail area it can possibly handle. Hence the name "Sunjammer", being designed along the same line: the largest sail the payload can practically handle using the lightest material available with just one aim: to maximise the conversion of the solar wind thus captured into forward motion.
*oceangoing windjammers were steel hulled and designed to carry cargo on intercontinental voyages following the prevailing winds. Maximising sail areas (usually by adding more masts and square riggings, as opposed to racing boats which used one to three large sheets and were designed for speed rather than capacity) allowed cargo capacities to be increased for sailing ships until they hit an average 2,000 tons, with the largest being just over 11,000 tons full displacement (the Preussen), while being able to maintain high cruising speeds (sometimes in excess of 18kt)
If you have a problem with me, bring it. If you're going to drag my arse through the legal system to do it, I will have my fucking jury. I will have my media presence, I will have my fucking headlines and YOU WILL BE EXPOSED.
the Zat seems to be a secondary weapon next to the P90 though - I would not be seen with a P90 in such a harsh environment, considering the magazine feed turns each round through 90 degrees before dropping it into the chamber! I would hate for that thing to freeze!
kill range on a scattershot using tri-ball 12 is 17 yards (anything smaller and ALL you're gonna do is piss it off). A polar bear can clear fifty one feet VERY fast. And they have very thick fur, so unless you catch it in the eye, you ain't killing it at range with a shotgun.
it's all bullshit, an Enfield will take any.303 Winchester barrel. If you need to replace the breech, you're replacing the rifle anyway. It takes about twenty minutes to handcut a beech stock for the Enfield. Springs? I'm pretty sure CZ Brno or Crosman can sort that out, even Umarex. Yes, they do make firearms most would consider toys but a spring is a spring. Hell, one of my first rifles was a Frankengun, built from parts of at least four weapons from three different manufacturers.
This, right here. And thank you, you do indeed speak for hunters the world over. We don't want multiple weapons in multiple calibres for multiple jobs, we want just one that does everything well and after being thrown, dropped, drowned, shat on, and kicked, it just goes right on trucking.
Disclosure: I am a small game (up to European hare sized) hunter in England, I carry one rifle (.22 Air Arms Mistral carbine with a straight 4x40 compact mildot), one pistol (Webley Junior Mk.II in.177 with iron sights) and one knife (Jack Pyke Mikata). That and the rest of my outdoor carry kit together weighs probably less combined than your Enfield. I don't want or need any more kit weight than that, particularly if I'm on a walk day and/or carrying a brace of dead critters.
fibreglass is only there as dopate for the matrix material, which is invariably nylon 6 or 66 in gun stocks. This somewhat mitigates damage from extreme cold but it does not prevent fissuring which in arctic conditions is death for anything that is subject to stress - like when a rifle is fired and the kick transmits through the stock.
well, we could always ask someone who knows. How about the patent holders for Nylon?
According to DuPont, the glass point of raw nylon 6 (the point at which it loses flexibility and takes on physical characteristics of plate glass) is around -40F. Doping can alleviate this in terms of overall structural integrity, but that becomes moot when water gets in and forces fissures apart. Also, ask ANYONE who a: lives in a cold climate and b: wears Goretex, just how their coats behave in extreme cold conditions.
ok, here it is: a beech stock costs about $5. That's trimmed for the action as well. A custom milled titanium alloy stock costs $850 *minimum* (knowing since I had a TA bullpup conversion made for a Benjamin Sheridan EB22 in '07).
If you're RFPing for ten thousand of these things, and you're on a Government budget, do the math and weigh that against the backlash when you turn a 50k expense into a million Dollars you could have spent elsewhere, like say on essential other survival gear such as water purification or cooking equipment.
Slashdot Mirror
you're both wrong. And so is King Cameron.
Conspiracy theory is hypothesis based on known fact, to be proved or disproved as conspiracy fact by gathering new evidence. For example, the UK is guilty of trafficking children on a pretext of protecting them, where the reality is that they are selling them for vast amounts of money. That's the conspiracy theory. The conspiracy fact is that this policy is enacted in Law (Children Act 1989, Children and Adoption Act 2002) and that local authorities have publicly admitted to it.
Tinfoil Hat Conspiracy is that which is based on fantastical assumption or claim with no basis in reality or possibility. A TFHC could be me extending the above to say that children are abducted by black helicopters and entire neighbourhoods are subjected to chemical mindwipes after the fact. Utterly ridiculous, which if used in the claim would write the entire thing off as some crackpot loony-tunes fucking head case.
sooo... take out a restraint claim?
Except that's not the reality of the situation at all.
Judges are paid by the Local Authorities whose local jurisdiction they operate under. That's done through Legal Aid, which is controlled by the Local Authorities.
Jurisdictions are defined by the areas served by the Local Authorities and the police who directly answer to them. Council Tax pays police salaries. It's right there on the itemised bill.
Ergo, the police are beholden to local authorities: they REFUSE to investigate criminal allegations against any member of a local authority staff. They REFUSE to arrest corrupt judges. The Crown Prosecution Service have on record a grand total of ZERO prosecutions ever or pending against serving judges. Judges REFUSE to jail police officers who demonstrably perjure themselves. I have ample anecdotal evidence of this (currently withheld from publication pending private criminal prosecutions against named judges), there is also plenty of evidence in the remarkable absence of stories in the mainstream media of serving police officers being jailed for criminal activity and a grand total of ZERO serving police officers EVER having been convicted and jailed for causing a wrongful death (even though there are several videos of police officers actually committing acts which directly resulted in death). They all piss in the same pot.
we HAVE Magna Carta. We HAVE a Bill of Rights. We HAVE a written Constitution.
1215, 1688 and 1688 respectively.
yeah sorry, America, your Constitution is based on a document written into Law 88 years before yours was.
no, retroactive censorship does exist - in most democracies, actually. Prime example is the Hansard record, where entire debates have been erased on Tony Blair and Gordon Brown's watches in attempts to hide their criminality. Fortunately some of us have eidetic memories and reliable means of caching web content.
Ashford v Thornton was after the Declaration of Independence by some margin, and no other challenge to the right of trial by combat appears on the United States judicial record. The ONLY theoretical hurdle to TBC is the UN Declaration on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to which the United States is signatory by virtue of its permanent position on the UN Security Council.
under sections 3, 4 and 4a of the public order act 1986? Fucking thousands.
got 3200+ more for you: that they've admitted to, is the number of children abducted from foreign nationals and subsequently trafficked between 2007-2012.
This is the UK I'm talking about, not some Middle East shithole.
I bullshit you not.
Threatening to hit someone when you're in person is assault.
Let me stop you right there. It's not assault, it's affray and fear or provocation of violence under the Public Order Act 1986 section 3(1) and 4(1). Cyberstalking would be covered under section 4A of the same Act (under hte heading "Intentional harassment, alarm or distress").
...and for future reference, the definitive reference to UK Statute is the UK Statutes website: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/...
Disclosure: I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer. This is not legal advice. Consult your own legal adviser.
uh... when did I make such a claim, again?
consider the fact that more and more prisons are finding their way into private hands. then ask again. And answer: full prisons earn money. Just like hotels, empty cells don't earn anything.
might as well post it in Jovian Decimal Time, then - and don't forget the fucking conversion key for that as well!
a windjammer* is a vessel designed to take full advantage of every bit of wind energy it can capture and put it into forward motion using the largest sail area it can possibly handle. Hence the name "Sunjammer", being designed along the same line: the largest sail the payload can practically handle using the lightest material available with just one aim: to maximise the conversion of the solar wind thus captured into forward motion.
*oceangoing windjammers were steel hulled and designed to carry cargo on intercontinental voyages following the prevailing winds. Maximising sail areas (usually by adding more masts and square riggings, as opposed to racing boats which used one to three large sheets and were designed for speed rather than capacity) allowed cargo capacities to be increased for sailing ships until they hit an average 2,000 tons, with the largest being just over 11,000 tons full displacement (the Preussen), while being able to maintain high cruising speeds (sometimes in excess of 18kt)
TOUGH.
If you have a problem with me, bring it. If you're going to drag my arse through the legal system to do it, I will have my fucking jury. I will have my media presence, I will have my fucking headlines and YOU WILL BE EXPOSED.
fucking Pacific Time, the fuck!? Idiot.
the Zat seems to be a secondary weapon next to the P90 though - I would not be seen with a P90 in such a harsh environment, considering the magazine feed turns each round through 90 degrees before dropping it into the chamber! I would hate for that thing to freeze!
Voyager is 37 years, 1 month and 14 days into her mission using the exact same hardware as she carried at launch. Still truckin'.
I would happily buy computer hardware from whoever made something that can survive that long in the most hostile environment in the universe.
reading comprehension fail. I did say "last month"... I was talking about 2014, not 2011. Is your calendar broken?
kill range on a scattershot using tri-ball 12 is 17 yards (anything smaller and ALL you're gonna do is piss it off). A polar bear can clear fifty one feet VERY fast. And they have very thick fur, so unless you catch it in the eye, you ain't killing it at range with a shotgun.
it's all bullshit, an Enfield will take any .303 Winchester barrel. If you need to replace the breech, you're replacing the rifle anyway. It takes about twenty minutes to handcut a beech stock for the Enfield. Springs? I'm pretty sure CZ Brno or Crosman can sort that out, even Umarex. Yes, they do make firearms most would consider toys but a spring is a spring. Hell, one of my first rifles was a Frankengun, built from parts of at least four weapons from three different manufacturers.
This, right here. And thank you, you do indeed speak for hunters the world over. We don't want multiple weapons in multiple calibres for multiple jobs, we want just one that does everything well and after being thrown, dropped, drowned, shat on, and kicked, it just goes right on trucking.
Disclosure: I am a small game (up to European hare sized) hunter in England, I carry one rifle (.22 Air Arms Mistral carbine with a straight 4x40 compact mildot), one pistol (Webley Junior Mk.II in .177 with iron sights) and one knife (Jack Pyke Mikata). That and the rest of my outdoor carry kit together weighs probably less combined than your Enfield. I don't want or need any more kit weight than that, particularly if I'm on a walk day and/or carrying a brace of dead critters.
fibreglass is only there as dopate for the matrix material, which is invariably nylon 6 or 66 in gun stocks. This somewhat mitigates damage from extreme cold but it does not prevent fissuring which in arctic conditions is death for anything that is subject to stress - like when a rifle is fired and the kick transmits through the stock.
I would think so, the deck-mounted platform only weighs 6 tonnes. You'd get that on the back of a longbase Hummer - or a Bradley.
M61 Gatling CIWS: when you absolutely, positively gotta cut every motherfucker in half with a wall of 20mm tungsten sabot.
well, we could always ask someone who knows. How about the patent holders for Nylon?
According to DuPont, the glass point of raw nylon 6 (the point at which it loses flexibility and takes on physical characteristics of plate glass) is around -40F. Doping can alleviate this in terms of overall structural integrity, but that becomes moot when water gets in and forces fissures apart. Also, ask ANYONE who a: lives in a cold climate and b: wears Goretex, just how their coats behave in extreme cold conditions.
ok, here it is: a beech stock costs about $5. That's trimmed for the action as well.
A custom milled titanium alloy stock costs $850 *minimum* (knowing since I had a TA bullpup conversion made for a Benjamin Sheridan EB22 in '07).
If you're RFPing for ten thousand of these things, and you're on a Government budget, do the math and weigh that against the backlash when you turn a 50k expense into a million Dollars you could have spent elsewhere, like say on essential other survival gear such as water purification or cooking equipment.