That would be the case if the FBI was manned by one person, and that person told a judge, "I discovered evidence..." and then later was exposed to be a lie. But since FBI agent #1 does some work, FBI #2 other work, they manage to get what they think (probably due to misunderstanding how things work on the web) is valid discovery, they go to FBI #3 who then tells the judge, "We discovered..."
To steal a funny word from spiritplumber, it just makes them derpy people.
Well, you're certainly correct. There's nothing that can be done to prevent every possible attack. And hey, maybe the reason that they didn't move all money into one account and close all the rest was because it would have triggered an alarm or two that are in place. But knowing that my SS# is out there makes me less secure, seeing as how it's how my bank recognizes (or confirms) me for all sorts of different reasons.
So in my saying "To Big To Be Accountable", I mean to say "What are they going to do to resurrect the security that used to be?" Probably nothing, and there isn't anyone that can make them. Recently my debit card was one involved in the Home Depot hack. I received a letter from my bank explaining that there was some activity on my card that led them to believe that it was included in that hack, and another card with a new PIN was issued to me. So, what can be done about my SS# and it's endless links to all of my banking data? That means home loans, the works. Do I get a new SS# and new house? Hell no. Who is accountable here, not in regards to failing to keep my info secure, but in regards to resurrecting the security that is no more?
Fuck them. I'm done. I'll never vote for another one.
Why not just never vote for a millionaire again? Or never vote for a human that has received campaign donations from billionaires. Or never vote for anyone that is able to run for office. All of these are the only choice we'll ever get and it's the root of the problem. These people didn't become millionaires or billionaires by having humanity's interests in mind.
I find it so contradictory that the same mass of people that seek booths in order to hide who they vote for, are so willing to hand out information that's much more personal to a site like facebook.
I have to imagine if you're wanting life insurance, this will be one of the first wells the insurance companies go to mine for info....I would.
Why the hell this isn't modded up is beyond me. You're absolutely correct in exposing, yet another, reason that displaying every little thing about yourself on a public message board is silly. I guess it's moronic to still beat the "stop using facebook" drum, but if you wouldn't go up to some random person on the street and tell them some bits of info about youself, regardless how in-depth, then don't post it on facebook. It's coming to the point that - just like when you are under arrest, the first thing the policeman will tell you is that you have the right to remain silent, if you refuse that right, everything you say can, and will be used against you in court - we need to think in terms of things that we say, on public boards, will be used against us. Maybe not in court, but surely the more data there is on each individual, the more these big-ass corporations can use that data in their favor. PS your privacy doesn't make anyone money, so it's not in their favor.
heh, every time I don't proof-read prior to posting, something's wrong. I had so much more that what I posted with that, but due to something that I fat-fingered with brackets, got omitted, and it was so much that I didn't feel like re-typing it all.
To sum it up though, I figure it's those that are into looking at "nude kids" as sexual pieces that have the problem. Simply being nude is not sexual, otherwise animals and plants have a lot to be ashamed of? I guess if a judge sees Superman 1, gets a stiffy, points the finger at the maker of that movie, and send out orders to arrest him, then.... well you get the point.
it's a better idea to make the law actually work than to sometimes just ignore people who are breaking it, which is what you're saying.
If we claim that "simply having had a picture of a nude kid is a crime against children", then there is a shit-ton of problems that will arise - Superman 1 has a nude kid in it. If all you can see in that scene (of the boy-superman standing there nude) is child porn, then you have something wrong with you. However, looking at the law "simply having had a picture of a nude kid is a crime against children", leaves us only to sort this out via prosecuting everyone that has a copy of superman 1. And looking in more depth at the phone that may have thousands of legal pictures, maybe porn or not, but one picture (that's been deleted, mind you) that was sent from a phone that is not in the person's address book of the phone, if we take that one picture and submit it to a grand jury for an indictment, only giving them the information "this was found on this guy's phone, he tried to delete it!" then we'll get the indictment. But this is leaving out all of the important information that anyone with any common sense would conclude that this needs to be thrown out.
I mean, if we're talking about a girl that took pictures of her own body, on her own phone, prior to the age 18, why would that be illegal? And now that's she's 18? If someone hacked her account... oh jeeze, never mind - this is so stupid I can't continue.
atleast here the the law is that if you take pictures of yourself when you are under 18 and have them there is no problem, the instant you turn 18 and you have kept pictures those pictures they can land you in jail for possession of child porn
Then we'd have to get into plants and animals - they're all nude. Basically this is all God's fault.
Although I understand your feelings, I don't agree with your problem-solving concept here. You are taking the "arrest them" road, when you should be taking the "Don't arrest me" road. If a bunch of kids get the idea of sexting a bunch of random people for laughs, and the cops are able to catch them, ok, arrest them. Not for production of child pornography, but rather something comparable to damaging private property. And if someone's phone is searched, and they find one deleted photo of a nude kid, and the owner claims that it was sent and they didn't know who or why, that shouldn't spark an investigation.
Because if they decide to arrest the kids for production of child pornography (where the pics are of their own bodies), then we further our debt to humanity, and are now lacking a few young adults, that should otherwise be raised to think in better terms than "arrest everyone when they do wrong". If we decide that every crime needs to end in someone's incarceration, then we are surely going back in time in terms of a society.
Exactly. This is what (almost) every married woman does, and a lot of divorced women do again. All you have to do is submit paperwork with your full old name, and your full new name. It all depends on your state, and and as far as I know, as long as you're not trying to evade the law in some manner, it's possible for everyone to change their name.
Think of the children when you take away their health insurance.
Think of the children when you tax the shit out of the lower class mommys and daddys.
Think of the children when you declare war.
There are many more, but let's be honest, if anyone in the government gave half of a shit about kids, children wouldn't be molested/beaten as much as they are these days. None of the ridiculous shit that the government can do, not even send someone into your house to monitor you 24/7 would stop child abuse of any kind. Keep alcohol legal, keep taxing the hell out of daddy and mommy, keep the streets as full of potholes as possible, keep the police as nervous as hell, keep the ability of corporations to pay government officials to sway law enactment, and you'll never, ever, ever, ever, EVER keep the children, or the adults, safe.
The games are fun to go to, but the folks that would like to advertize to you from the TV want their share of your time too. Not that there aren't folks advertizing to you at the game... it's just different.
I see, thanks. So it'd take a hell of an EMP. This puts into perspective the intensity of the sun's explosions that can still cause major outages by the time they reach Earth. And damn, poor Mercury!
In war-thinking, the general idea is to "destroy" the enemy. In space all you'd have to do is stop their ability to thrust in any given direction, and they're just an object flying through space, waiting for another mass to alter it's course. Essentially destroyed. So EMPs seem to be the weapon of choice here, no?
I mean, let's face it, at least in America, no one's looking at anything anyway. They're all face-down in their $device. And in the same manner as this ridiculous article where you have to stay away from the center of the lens, all you have to do is stay away from being on the people's device, or between it and them - and you're effectively cloaked to them.
Slashdot Mirror
Yup. And if you post it to facebook, so will they.
You mean "Windows Nein"?
Explain how my concept doesn't solve the problem please.
Because there's no problem. This article is mostly clickbait.
Why not just go with "Windows Nine".
That would be the case if the FBI was manned by one person, and that person told a judge, "I discovered evidence..." and then later was exposed to be a lie. But since FBI agent #1 does some work, FBI #2 other work, they manage to get what they think (probably due to misunderstanding how things work on the web) is valid discovery, they go to FBI #3 who then tells the judge, "We discovered..."
To steal a funny word from spiritplumber, it just makes them derpy people.
Well, you're certainly correct. There's nothing that can be done to prevent every possible attack. And hey, maybe the reason that they didn't move all money into one account and close all the rest was because it would have triggered an alarm or two that are in place. But knowing that my SS# is out there makes me less secure, seeing as how it's how my bank recognizes (or confirms) me for all sorts of different reasons.
So in my saying "To Big To Be Accountable", I mean to say "What are they going to do to resurrect the security that used to be?" Probably nothing, and there isn't anyone that can make them. Recently my debit card was one involved in the Home Depot hack. I received a letter from my bank explaining that there was some activity on my card that led them to believe that it was included in that hack, and another card with a new PIN was issued to me. So, what can be done about my SS# and it's endless links to all of my banking data? That means home loans, the works. Do I get a new SS# and new house? Hell no. Who is accountable here, not in regards to failing to keep my info secure, but in regards to resurrecting the security that is no more?
Fuck them. I'm done. I'll never vote for another one.
Why not just never vote for a millionaire again? Or never vote for a human that has received campaign donations from billionaires. Or never vote for anyone that is able to run for office. All of these are the only choice we'll ever get and it's the root of the problem. These people didn't become millionaires or billionaires by having humanity's interests in mind.
Group of luddite imbeciles opposes net neutrality.
Nonono. Group of millionaires opposes net neutrality.
Because once net neutrality is abolished, things will get expensive.
I find it so contradictory that the same mass of people that seek booths in order to hide who they vote for, are so willing to hand out information that's much more personal to a site like facebook.
I have to imagine if you're wanting life insurance, this will be one of the first wells the insurance companies go to mine for info....I would.
Why the hell this isn't modded up is beyond me. You're absolutely correct in exposing, yet another, reason that displaying every little thing about yourself on a public message board is silly. I guess it's moronic to still beat the "stop using facebook" drum, but if you wouldn't go up to some random person on the street and tell them some bits of info about youself, regardless how in-depth, then don't post it on facebook. It's coming to the point that - just like when you are under arrest, the first thing the policeman will tell you is that you have the right to remain silent, if you refuse that right, everything you say can, and will be used against you in court - we need to think in terms of things that we say, on public boards, will be used against us. Maybe not in court, but surely the more data there is on each individual, the more these big-ass corporations can use that data in their favor. PS your privacy doesn't make anyone money, so it's not in their favor.
To Big To Be Accountable
heh, every time I don't proof-read prior to posting, something's wrong. I had so much more that what I posted with that, but due to something that I fat-fingered with brackets, got omitted, and it was so much that I didn't feel like re-typing it all.
To sum it up though, I figure it's those that are into looking at "nude kids" as sexual pieces that have the problem. Simply being nude is not sexual, otherwise animals and plants have a lot to be ashamed of? I guess if a judge sees Superman 1, gets a stiffy, points the finger at the maker of that movie, and send out orders to arrest him, then.... well you get the point.
it's a better idea to make the law actually work than to sometimes just ignore people who are breaking it, which is what you're saying.
If we claim that "simply having had a picture of a nude kid is a crime against children", then there is a shit-ton of problems that will arise - Superman 1 has a nude kid in it. If all you can see in that scene (of the boy-superman standing there nude) is child porn, then you have something wrong with you. However, looking at the law "simply having had a picture of a nude kid is a crime against children", leaves us only to sort this out via prosecuting everyone that has a copy of superman 1. And looking in more depth at the phone that may have thousands of legal pictures, maybe porn or not, but one picture (that's been deleted, mind you) that was sent from a phone that is not in the person's address book of the phone, if we take that one picture and submit it to a grand jury for an indictment, only giving them the information "this was found on this guy's phone, he tried to delete it!" then we'll get the indictment. But this is leaving out all of the important information that anyone with any common sense would conclude that this needs to be thrown out.
I mean, if we're talking about a girl that took pictures of her own body, on her own phone, prior to the age 18, why would that be illegal? And now that's she's 18? If someone hacked her account... oh jeeze, never mind - this is so stupid I can't continue.
Hell, what's yer IP?
atleast here the the law is that if you take pictures of yourself when you are under 18 and have them there is no problem, the instant you turn 18 and you have kept pictures those pictures they can land you in jail for possession of child porn
Then we'd have to get into plants and animals - they're all nude. Basically this is all God's fault.
Although I understand your feelings, I don't agree with your problem-solving concept here. You are taking the "arrest them" road, when you should be taking the "Don't arrest me" road. If a bunch of kids get the idea of sexting a bunch of random people for laughs, and the cops are able to catch them, ok, arrest them. Not for production of child pornography, but rather something comparable to damaging private property. And if someone's phone is searched, and they find one deleted photo of a nude kid, and the owner claims that it was sent and they didn't know who or why, that shouldn't spark an investigation.
Because if they decide to arrest the kids for production of child pornography (where the pics are of their own bodies), then we further our debt to humanity, and are now lacking a few young adults, that should otherwise be raised to think in better terms than "arrest everyone when they do wrong". If we decide that every crime needs to end in someone's incarceration, then we are surely going back in time in terms of a society.
Under those interpretations of the laws, Superman 1 would be child porn.
And wouldn't it be something if she was charged as an adult?
Exactly. This is what (almost) every married woman does, and a lot of divorced women do again. All you have to do is submit paperwork with your full old name, and your full new name. It all depends on your state, and and as far as I know, as long as you're not trying to evade the law in some manner, it's possible for everyone to change their name.
Think of the children when you take away their health insurance.
Think of the children when you tax the shit out of the lower class mommys and daddys.
Think of the children when you declare war.
There are many more, but let's be honest, if anyone in the government gave half of a shit about kids, children wouldn't be molested/beaten as much as they are these days. None of the ridiculous shit that the government can do, not even send someone into your house to monitor you 24/7 would stop child abuse of any kind. Keep alcohol legal, keep taxing the hell out of daddy and mommy, keep the streets as full of potholes as possible, keep the police as nervous as hell, keep the ability of corporations to pay government officials to sway law enactment, and you'll never, ever, ever, ever, EVER keep the children, or the adults, safe.
The games are fun to go to, but the folks that would like to advertize to you from the TV want their share of your time too. Not that there aren't folks advertizing to you at the game... it's just different.
I see, thanks. So it'd take a hell of an EMP. This puts into perspective the intensity of the sun's explosions that can still cause major outages by the time they reach Earth. And damn, poor Mercury!
In war-thinking, the general idea is to "destroy" the enemy. In space all you'd have to do is stop their ability to thrust in any given direction, and they're just an object flying through space, waiting for another mass to alter it's course. Essentially destroyed. So EMPs seem to be the weapon of choice here, no?
Then you will truly be little brother.
I mean, let's face it, at least in America, no one's looking at anything anyway. They're all face-down in their $device. And in the same manner as this ridiculous article where you have to stay away from the center of the lens, all you have to do is stay away from being on the people's device, or between it and them - and you're effectively cloaked to them.