Assange spoke today -- Sunday. That statement by the U.S. was released two days ago in response to Ecuador calling for a meeting of the OAS. It was *NOT* in response to Mr. Assange's speech, as the summary implies.
The only way I'd pay it is to put the whole lot on piratebay. You say that's not nice? Well, what's the point of it being public domain if you have to buy a subscription and it's mean to share it?
That is putting words in my mouth, and what I objected to.
On the Internet, everyone may not know you're a dog but by the tone of your comments they can be damn certain you're a douchebag.
Don't put words in my mouth. The reason I payed the $50 was to get access to the whole lot as lossless. I'm converting them from AAC to Ogg-FLAC with proper tags and will bundle them as a torrent. Pirate Bay is one of many places I hope to see them.
That *IS* the point of them being public domain, after all. And the entire point of this project was to share quality music.
No, I'm saying it provides a layer of privacy expectation.
I didn't want to write paragraphs on radio direction finding and signal identification methods needed by a general observer, contrasting them with methods used by LEOs. They don't bother with that. They work with the telco to get cell tower signal data for the specific customer.
No, I am not incorrect. However, I might have been unclear. Let me try again.
When using an MVNO like Straight Talk that resells using T-Mobile's network, T-Mobile *does not allow non-network text messages thru*.
If you have standard T-Mobile service from TMO themselves, they do allow those messages.
Using T-Mobile I can get text messages from Google, my bank, and friends on other networks like AT&T, Sprint and Verizon.
Using a Straight Talk account with a T-Mobile SIM I can only receive text messages from other Straight Talk or T-Mobile sources.
For example, using Bank of America's or Google's 2-factor authentication which sends a text message to your phone *does not work* using Straight Talk with a T-Mobile compatible SIM. It did work when I had service from T-Mobile directly. It worked again when I switched SIMs to an AT&T-compatible on Straight Talk.
Interesting about those WebGuard service. I did not know that.
Theatrical hype by the Foreign Minister of Ecuador, matched by your own theatrical ranting.
How about stating what the aide-memoire contained reflecting the UK position?
However the note did point out that the foreign secretary had the power to go to court to seek the right for UK police to enter the Ecuadorean embassy to arrest Assange. He would have to prove that international law had been broken and that Ecuador was in contravention of its Vienna Convention obligations in harbouring Assange.
The foreign office is confident these conditions would be met. It says the embassy would have a week's notice of the action and the police would not look at or remove any embassy documents and the diplomatic immunity of Ecuadorean diplomats would not be affected.
That really doesn't sound like "storming" to me. All from the Guardian live blog.
Calm down and discuss this rationally. It is a horrible step for the UK to even consider, but applying the partisan frothing-at-the-mouth ranting currently in vogue in American politics isn't helping.
Just FYI, T-Mobile doesn't let outside SMS/MMS messages thru for the MVNOs.
That is, using Straight Talk, you won't receive any text message sent to you from anyone who is not on T-Mobile or Straight Talk. They were blocking the 2-factor text messages that Bank of America sends when I had them.
A SIM car for an unlocked phone costs $15. Unlimited talk, text and web costs $45 per month.
I dumped AT&T and T-Mobile a few months ago and haven't looked back. This is cheaper and the same networks.
Avoid T-Mobile compatible phones for this service. Straight Talk is an MVNO and T-Mobile is a bunch of dicks. They won't let outside SMS messages thru. AT&T doesn't do that to MVNOs and SMS/MMS works fine.
I currently have a Google Samsung Galaxy Nexus and a HTC Glacier (MyTouch 4G) using this plan.
If you don't need unlimited, and it isn't a smartphone, ST has a $30 plan that might suit you. No commitment or contract, just get a new card at Walmart or refill online.
It does NOT broadcast your location to everyone within 45 miles. GSM, for example, encrypts the signal. Details about whom the signal belongs to and what it contains are between the subscriber and the service.
What this ruling is about isn't "other people", it is the State conducting a surreptitious search without a warrant. The nature of the radio transmission and the encryption give me a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Yes, display a "registration confirmation e-mail sent" and do it early on in the process. Require a confirming click before continuing.
Send the e-mail. In the e-mail have a statement like "you already have an account -- would you like a reminder? If you didn't try and register here, just ignore this."
The person looking for active accounts by rejection on the web site gets no feedback. Problem solved.
Here's a thought. How about just waiting until September 12th to see what they actually release? Maybe take the extra time you'd be wasting on speculation to get some actual work done.
If everyone took all the time they waste on speculating on future Apple products and the 2012 U.S. Election and actually did some useful work, the economy would recover in a week.
Not really, as the Defense portion of the Budget is about $700 billion annually and the appropriations for the two wars is about $170 billion annually.
What is an interesting dodge is not accounting for the indirect military spending. Also, if you assign the associated interest payments on all that where they belong instead of a category by themselves you get a different picture.
Then military spending comes in at about 35% of the total budget.
"After they've learned what the project is, they insist it is being done wrong and must be done THEIR way, essentially setting the project back to square one."
Common misconception. You are *not* required to go with the lowest bidder. You just need a good reason to pick someone more expensive. "I think they're bullshitting and can't really do this" is a valid reason.
I was amazed when I looked at Open Street Map last. My area showed damn near everything from power lines to railroads and nit-pickly little details. It is impressive.
Interesting. The first link is blocked by my work filter as a "malicious site". Normally I can click thru the blocked stuff but this one won't let me. I think it thinks that site is hosting malware.
Yet still you have a Facebook account. Why exactly should they set the bar higher if all their screw-ups do is get them more free publicity?
Every time FB fucks up, the online world whines like it is the end of life as we know it. All you're doing is confirming to FB that you're addicted and can't live without them.
Why again should they change? You're their bitch and they like it that way.
Slashdot Mirror
Assange spoke today -- Sunday. That statement by the U.S. was released two days ago in response to Ecuador calling for a meeting of the OAS. It was *NOT* in response to Mr. Assange's speech, as the summary implies.
The only way I'd pay it is to put the whole lot on piratebay. You say that's not nice? Well, what's the point of it being public domain if you have to buy a subscription and it's mean to share it?
That is putting words in my mouth, and what I objected to.
On the Internet, everyone may not know you're a dog but by the tone of your comments they can be damn certain you're a douchebag.
Don't put words in my mouth. The reason I payed the $50 was to get access to the whole lot as lossless. I'm converting them from AAC to Ogg-FLAC with proper tags and will bundle them as a torrent. Pirate Bay is one of many places I hope to see them.
That *IS* the point of them being public domain, after all. And the entire point of this project was to share quality music.
You didn't recognize those once they started playing? You've lived a sheltered life, musically.
Pay the $50 annual subscription to Musopen and download various stuff at high quality (lossless AAC). You will not be disappointed.
[The Peer Gynt Suite No 1, Op 46., I - IV are fantastic and the first pieces I downloaded.]
No, I'm saying it provides a layer of privacy expectation.
I didn't want to write paragraphs on radio direction finding and signal identification methods needed by a general observer, contrasting them with methods used by LEOs. They don't bother with that. They work with the telco to get cell tower signal data for the specific customer.
Actually, I was referring to the conversation you have when talking to someone, but can see where I was unclear. Thanks.
No, I am not incorrect. However, I might have been unclear. Let me try again.
When using an MVNO like Straight Talk that resells using T-Mobile's network, T-Mobile *does not allow non-network text messages thru*.
If you have standard T-Mobile service from TMO themselves, they do allow those messages.
Using T-Mobile I can get text messages from Google, my bank, and friends on other networks like AT&T, Sprint and Verizon.
Using a Straight Talk account with a T-Mobile SIM I can only receive text messages from other Straight Talk or T-Mobile sources.
For example, using Bank of America's or Google's 2-factor authentication which sends a text message to your phone *does not work* using Straight Talk with a T-Mobile compatible SIM. It did work when I had service from T-Mobile directly. It worked again when I switched SIMs to an AT&T-compatible on Straight Talk.
Interesting about those WebGuard service. I did not know that.
Theatrical hype by the Foreign Minister of Ecuador, matched by your own theatrical ranting.
How about stating what the aide-memoire contained reflecting the UK position?
That really doesn't sound like "storming" to me. All from the Guardian live blog.
Calm down and discuss this rationally. It is a horrible step for the UK to even consider, but applying the partisan frothing-at-the-mouth ranting currently in vogue in American politics isn't helping.
Just FYI, T-Mobile doesn't let outside SMS/MMS messages thru for the MVNOs.
That is, using Straight Talk, you won't receive any text message sent to you from anyone who is not on T-Mobile or Straight Talk. They were blocking the 2-factor text messages that Bank of America sends when I had them.
I switched to an AT&T SIM and it works fine.
A SIM car for an unlocked phone costs $15. Unlimited talk, text and web costs $45 per month.
I dumped AT&T and T-Mobile a few months ago and haven't looked back. This is cheaper and the same networks.
Avoid T-Mobile compatible phones for this service. Straight Talk is an MVNO and T-Mobile is a bunch of dicks. They won't let outside SMS messages thru. AT&T doesn't do that to MVNOs and SMS/MMS works fine.
I currently have a Google Samsung Galaxy Nexus and a HTC Glacier (MyTouch 4G) using this plan.
If you don't need unlimited, and it isn't a smartphone, ST has a $30 plan that might suit you. No commitment or contract, just get a new card at Walmart or refill online.
It does NOT broadcast your location to everyone within 45 miles. GSM, for example, encrypts the signal. Details about whom the signal belongs to and what it contains are between the subscriber and the service.
What this ruling is about isn't "other people", it is the State conducting a surreptitious search without a warrant. The nature of the radio transmission and the encryption give me a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Yes, display a "registration confirmation e-mail sent" and do it early on in the process. Require a confirming click before continuing.
Send the e-mail. In the e-mail have a statement like "you already have an account -- would you like a reminder? If you didn't try and register here, just ignore this."
The person looking for active accounts by rejection on the web site gets no feedback. Problem solved.
Compiling!
Here's a thought. How about just waiting until September 12th to see what they actually release? Maybe take the extra time you'd be wasting on speculation to get some actual work done.
If everyone took all the time they waste on speculating on future Apple products and the 2012 U.S. Election and actually did some useful work, the economy would recover in a week.
Not really, as the Defense portion of the Budget is about $700 billion annually and the appropriations for the two wars is about $170 billion annually.
What is an interesting dodge is not accounting for the indirect military spending. Also, if you assign the associated interest payments on all that where they belong instead of a category by themselves you get a different picture.
Then military spending comes in at about 35% of the total budget.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2011.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0933935.html
Orlando.
The article covered two things -- the specific mini PC and the thin-mini ITX as a motherboard standard.
I was addressing the motherboard spec, which you can pop in a whole range of cases depending on your need.
It has a full PCIe x4 slot. You can, but you're defeating the purpose of "slim".
There are also Mini-ITX motherboards with PCIe x16 slots.
Yeah. We've been telling that to New Orleans for over 150 years and see how well they listened.
The phrase "we'll chat later, I going to do some shopping over at Walmart" should not be construed as investment advice in canned foods and weapons.
You skipped an important step.
Insert after sentence 4:
"After they've learned what the project is, they insist it is being done wrong and must be done THEIR way, essentially setting the project back to square one."
Common misconception. You are *not* required to go with the lowest bidder. You just need a good reason to pick someone more expensive. "I think they're bullshitting and can't really do this" is a valid reason.
I was amazed when I looked at Open Street Map last. My area showed damn near everything from power lines to railroads and nit-pickly little details. It is impressive.
Interesting. The first link is blocked by my work filter as a "malicious site". Normally I can click thru the blocked stuff but this one won't let me. I think it thinks that site is hosting malware.
Yet still you have a Facebook account. Why exactly should they set the bar higher if all their screw-ups do is get them more free publicity?
Every time FB fucks up, the online world whines like it is the end of life as we know it. All you're doing is confirming to FB that you're addicted and can't live without them.
Why again should they change? You're their bitch and they like it that way.