Not if this is a rePUBLIC! The most relevant possible thing here is from the Declaration of Independence "...deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed". Trump didn't get that.
Much of what costs isn't in advertising to the public It's in fishing jaunts for Dr.'s, payola to Bureaucrats, "Free" medical symposia to peddle the latest nostrum and "Free" contributions to Legislators
FAIR has bias. Vanity Fair has bias Snopes? not a chance Poltifact? Proof offered has been, to be generous, lacking. The right, however, drools, as Conservapedia proves so very well
Nope The mere fact that voters in one state have a higher electoral votes / voters ratio is proof of violation of "EQUAL rights, privileges and immunities". Therefore, I contend that the 14th Amendment has vitiated the EC and it must be struck down (later amendments change the existing law)
I did. And then I read the 14th Amendment. Can't have both. 4 California Democrats are greater than 1 Republican Minnasotan. If the votes are equally PRIVILEGED (read the 14th) then the electoral college is granting a preference for one citizen over another UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
Wrong. Failing to exercise due diligence means the Senate surrendered the right If Obama were a liberal, he would have summarily appointed Garland and let the chips fall where they would
Notice how the right trolls are out in force claiming fact checking is biased therefore must not be done? Knew this was coming Can't win the argument, lie about the evidence.
Wrong Both Rutherford B. Hayes and G.W. Bush did not get the popular votes necessary to get the electoral votes. Both were failures Trump did get the electoral votes, but only if you disregard the 14th Amendment guarantee of equal rights, privileges and immunities. Bluntly, the electoral college has been unconstitutional since 1873
Mostly False when stating "the sun is shining now" and the facts in evidence are "it is night out" it is true the sun is shining somewhere, but the statement is not supported by the facts in evidence, even though they are true.
The various drug companies spend 3 1/2 x as much on advertising and marketing as research, with MOST basic research paid for by governments and sold for pennies or given away for free Welfare starts at the top
Remind me again what did we have before we got capitalism?
Feudalism, which is Capitalism minus the need to compete by the inheritance class Imperialism, which is Feudalism without the need to keep track of inheritances. Mercantileism, which is the worst of all three combined with pre-nation state chaos And before that? A free market, with those who owed armies owning everything, including the water.
Yes, I read it Immediately noted his "argument" about lagging can NOT apply to this case given there is no ice age, and rebutted All the evasion did was demonstrate that he knows the argument is fallacious but chooses to use it anyway.
Oddly, more Democrats/Libturds voted for the Voting rights act than Republican'ts. By a lot. Clinton got rich by beating your sick asses so often his books and speeches became hot demand items. That old "Marketplace of Ideas" strikes again!
Slashdot Mirror
Once more, show me the proof that the PRODUCT IS FALSE.
So far, Finding the republicans lie more and more severely is simply true.
In every contract law ever tested.
Abandon your duties and your contract is null and void
"Turning out to be a Good One"?
What is the color of your sky? It surely isn't blue
So....live with the theft of ANOTHER election without comment?
THAT would be an unpardonable crime!
Not if this is a rePUBLIC!
The most relevant possible thing here is from the Declaration of Independence
"...deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed".
Trump didn't get that.
Much of what costs isn't in advertising to the public
It's in fishing jaunts for Dr.'s, payola to Bureaucrats, "Free" medical symposia to peddle the latest nostrum and "Free" contributions to Legislators
None of which Capitalists will ever agree to permit.
FAIR has bias.
Vanity Fair has bias
Snopes? not a chance
Poltifact? Proof offered has been, to be generous, lacking.
The right, however, drools, as Conservapedia proves so very well
And?
Given that they spend far more on Marketing, their claim "must have higher revenue" is specious
Nope
The mere fact that voters in one state have a higher electoral votes / voters ratio is proof of violation of "EQUAL rights, privileges and immunities".
Therefore, I contend that the 14th Amendment has vitiated the EC and it must be struck down (later amendments change the existing law)
I did.
And then I read the 14th Amendment.
Can't have both.
4 California Democrats are greater than 1 Republican Minnasotan.
If the votes are equally PRIVILEGED (read the 14th) then the electoral college is granting a preference for one citizen over another
UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
Proof required when you repeat that lie!
Selective leaks, SELECTIVE. Hacks mattered because the hackers refused to divulge Trump's entangled Russian affiliations
Wrong.
Failing to exercise due diligence means the Senate surrendered the right
If Obama were a liberal, he would have summarily appointed Garland and let the chips fall where they would
Notice how the right trolls are out in force claiming fact checking is biased therefore must not be done?
Knew this was coming
Can't win the argument, lie about the evidence.
What grief?
A fraud took the office thanks to Electors refusing to obey the Constitution.
That isn't a grief, that's a grievance.
Wrong
Both Rutherford B. Hayes and G.W. Bush did not get the popular votes necessary to get the electoral votes.
Both were failures
Trump did get the electoral votes, but only if you disregard the 14th Amendment guarantee of equal rights, privileges and immunities.
Bluntly, the electoral college has been unconstitutional since 1873
Mostly False when stating "the sun is shining now" and the facts in evidence are "it is night out"
it is true the sun is shining somewhere, but the statement is not supported by the facts in evidence, even though they are true.
Proof of dead voters REQUIRED when you say those lies chump!
The various drug companies spend 3 1/2 x as much on advertising and marketing as research, with MOST basic research paid for by governments and sold for pennies or given away for free
Welfare starts at the top
Then why did Comey admit that RUSSIANS sourced the hacks?
More lies by the rightards
This is America.
We don't execute criminal billionaires
We steal elections for them via the FBI director
Remind me again what did we have before we got capitalism?
Feudalism, which is Capitalism minus the need to compete by the inheritance class
Imperialism, which is Feudalism without the need to keep track of inheritances.
Mercantileism, which is the worst of all three combined with pre-nation state chaos
And before that?
A free market, with those who owed armies owning everything, including the water.
Yes, I read it
Immediately noted his "argument" about lagging can NOT apply to this case given there is no ice age, and rebutted
All the evasion did was demonstrate that he knows the argument is fallacious but chooses to use it anyway.
Oddly, more Democrats/Libturds voted for the Voting rights act than Republican'ts. By a lot.
Clinton got rich by beating your sick asses so often his books and speeches became hot demand items.
That old "Marketplace of Ideas" strikes again!