And the topic raised by the preceding post was "Do women compete for top jobs". The answer is, of course, YES since the people, the alleged source of all legitimate power, voted to give HER the power So, stfu.
Hello? MORE VOTES This ring any bells? MORE Americans wanted Hillary But thanks to unequal representation (this is why there are 30000 people per Electoral vote in ND and 180,000 per in CA) we got the Orange Fraud. We don't have to eliminate the Electoral College. We do have to add enough delegates to restore the 14th Amendment equal rights, privileges and immunities.
After her flip-flop on Saddam, saying in April, 2001 that Saddam was "Well contained" only to spew the official line when she, unlike Congress, KNEW the WMD tales were a lie, no, we would NOT have elected her
This kind of patronizing attitude is the most pervasive form of sexism. Women don't need "their turn" they're perfectly capable of competing for top jobs.
Considering she won the votes of MORE PEOPLE in this supposed Democratic Republic, your point is proven true!
Dan Rather, who told the truth as far as he knew it? Dan Rather, who was dumped because of Right Wing screams about Bias even though the only living witness to the ACTUAL operations when Bush went AWOL testified to the correctness of that reportage? Dan Rather, thrown under the bus? No,telling the TRUTH against the right has always been punishable.
Pity that the insane conspiracy stories always have a right-wing slant G.W. lied about WMD? Fact Hillary lied about Foundation donations leading to contracts to buy medicine for ISIS? Total complete lie And the latest Alt-Right lie? False equivalency
Oh, seriously, THIS Right Wing Whacko Garbage"Interpretation" is your idea of evidence? Well go back to class, you've forgotten everything you ever didn't know about "Critical Thinking" "False" information WITHOUT intent to commit crime being proven is NOT evidence of crime!
And THAT is where the 99% being impoverished comes from, intergenerational unearned income for those born into the right families. Can you say Oligarchy?
Nothing will change Millions, then Billions will be out of work Eventually, labor will become so cheap that the 1% need no longer concern themselves with the 99% The current system of support will be eliminated, the 99% will experience shorter lives, with more desperation Girls will work the street and men will break laws to buy subsistence Police will be increased, killings will multiply, finally biowar will be used to eliminate much of the 99% threat. NEVER count on the long term thinking of the 1% as being altruistic Equality has to be taken by force. And it won't happen in this perfect information world.
Surely does make him a liar and hypocrite. Then again, the Party of Reagan has no problem with lies or hypocrisy, given how they tout his "tax cuts" while ignoring that taxes ROSE under Reagan...for the bottom 80%
Lie. Trump, however, routinely employs foreign labor for his projects and offshores his banking and accounting Pretty much proving that conspiracy triumphs over facts.
Energy gain or loss? Including all down-conversion losses when the oil is refined and burned, that is? Synthetic oil is old news, the Nazis even did it But so far, no gain.
Simple scripts eliminated all redundants, estimated to be 75%. Keyword search deletes family references Server source removes all Not-to-or-from-Hillary What's left? A few thousand? And they had 3 weeks before Comey broke the law to do this WITHOUT violating the warrant to search. No one had to see a single syllable to see the redundancy and know this was not unreported communication.
Let's see Has Trump been the victim of not one but TWO illegal leak campaigns by the FBI at the last second and STILL been found "Not criminal"? No. has Trump University been ruled NOT a criminal enterprise under RICO? No Has Trump ever apologized for lying about Mexican immigrants? No. So who is the slimiest here?
Wrong In any election this close, voting 3rd party IS aiding the slimiest, most despicable fraud ever to run for President...well except for Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, G.W. Bush (I leave out Bush the elder because he knew he was a fraud, at least)
Slashdot Mirror
No. Gerrymandering
And the topic raised by the preceding post was "Do women compete for top jobs".
The answer is, of course, YES since the people, the alleged source of all legitimate power, voted to give HER the power
So, stfu.
Hello?
MORE VOTES
This ring any bells?
MORE Americans wanted Hillary
But thanks to unequal representation (this is why there are 30000 people per Electoral vote in ND and 180,000 per in CA) we got the Orange Fraud.
We don't have to eliminate the Electoral College.
We do have to add enough delegates to restore the 14th Amendment equal rights, privileges and immunities.
Wait, CARLY FIORINA is your idea of a Beauty?
I know a good optometrist who can fix that!
After her flip-flop on Saddam, saying in April, 2001 that Saddam was "Well contained" only to spew the official line when she, unlike Congress, KNEW the WMD tales were a lie, no, we would NOT have elected her
This kind of patronizing attitude is the most pervasive form of sexism. Women don't need "their turn" they're perfectly capable of competing for top jobs.
Considering she won the votes of MORE PEOPLE in this supposed Democratic Republic, your point is proven true!
Cite EVIDENCE!!!
Not so much as a scintilla of evidence of a massive slowdown!
And it was working
Except: FBI criminals
Put the blame where it belongs
Nice try. Show me intent to release classified material.
Guess what? Lying to Congress on inconsequentials is NOT a crime.
Well, yes, I'm just making the point the lied-to are not responsible for the lies.
Dan Rather, who told the truth as far as he knew it?
Dan Rather, who was dumped because of Right Wing screams about Bias even though the only living witness to the ACTUAL operations when Bush went AWOL testified to the correctness of that reportage?
Dan Rather, thrown under the bus?
No,telling the TRUTH against the right has always been punishable.
Ah, so the old people scammed by the IRS fakes DESERVE to be impoverished?
Sick fu-k!
Oooohhhh boy
So the bag was lost after sorting.
Well THERE is proof of conspiracy
Oh, wait....
Pity that the insane conspiracy stories always have a right-wing slant
G.W. lied about WMD? Fact
Hillary lied about Foundation donations leading to contracts to buy medicine for ISIS? Total complete lie
And the latest Alt-Right lie? False equivalency
Oh, seriously, THIS Right Wing Whacko Garbage"Interpretation" is your idea of evidence?
Well go back to class, you've forgotten everything you ever didn't know about "Critical Thinking"
"False" information WITHOUT intent to commit crime being proven is NOT evidence of crime!
And THAT is where the 99% being impoverished comes from, intergenerational unearned income for those born into the right families.
Can you say Oligarchy?
Nothing will change
Millions, then Billions will be out of work
Eventually, labor will become so cheap that the 1% need no longer concern themselves with the 99%
The current system of support will be eliminated, the 99% will experience shorter lives, with more desperation
Girls will work the street and men will break laws to buy subsistence
Police will be increased, killings will multiply, finally biowar will be used to eliminate much of the 99% threat.
NEVER count on the long term thinking of the 1% as being altruistic
Equality has to be taken by force.
And it won't happen in this perfect information world.
Surely does make him a liar and hypocrite.
Then again, the Party of Reagan has no problem with lies or hypocrisy, given how they tout his "tax cuts" while ignoring that taxes ROSE under Reagan...for the bottom 80%
Lie.
Trump, however, routinely employs foreign labor for his projects and offshores his banking and accounting
Pretty much proving that conspiracy triumphs over facts.
Energy gain or loss?
Including all down-conversion losses when the oil is refined and burned, that is?
Synthetic oil is old news, the Nazis even did it
But so far, no gain.
and we will pity sheeple like yourself for thinking it's ok to have a corrupt felon running your country.
A felon is a person convicted of a felony
Thus, OBJECTION YOUR HONOR!! Reference to facts not in evidence anywhere!
You've got some santorum on your chin,...
Oh hell, now I have to get coffee out of my keyboard
Thanks
Simple scripts eliminated all redundants, estimated to be 75%.
Keyword search deletes family references
Server source removes all Not-to-or-from-Hillary
What's left? A few thousand?
And they had 3 weeks before Comey broke the law to do this WITHOUT violating the warrant to search. No one had to see a single syllable to see the redundancy and know this was not unreported communication.
Let's see
Has Trump been the victim of not one but TWO illegal leak campaigns by the FBI at the last second and STILL been found "Not criminal"?
No.
has Trump University been ruled NOT a criminal enterprise under RICO?
No
Has Trump ever apologized for lying about Mexican immigrants?
No.
So who is the slimiest here?
Wrong
In any election this close, voting 3rd party IS aiding the slimiest, most despicable fraud ever to run for President...well except for Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, G.W. Bush (I leave out Bush the elder because he knew he was a fraud, at least)