They also have big 'safe' cages blocking view. If entities are on collision course then the angle doesn't change and you are not/less seen because the pedestrian only 'becomes bigger'. That is why a small change in speeds really helps.
He would be against books because it contains too many ideas that can be freely reused. He would oppose forums on the internet because reviews from citizens cannot have a good quality and are bad for profession newspaper reviewers. And webshops should be forbidden: Bad for old fashion shops. And this email stuff costs too many jobs at the postal services.
Like any service (i.e. preventing bad voodoo) you cannot guarantee service levels without monitoring. Service == monitoring.
Nice story: A Dutch army base had a lot of anti-nucleair protesters around an they often came in. It turned out that they changed the lock at one of the (never used) break-away doors. Monitor the lock.
If you never sent any large quantities of mail, you do not have a good reputation (just 'no reputation'). Trying to send large quantities of mail is impossible to large parties. If you let a warm IP 'cool', its reputation is gone. It takes many months, or longer, to heat it up. One bad mailing = blacklistings (which are 1 to 3 days) + a hit in reputation.
That is half of the truth. The second part is content/applicability and ease of opt-out.
If my pencil-shop sends me an email after 5 years because he wants to sell a new one, it is spam. You don't expect it. If my car-dealer sends me an email after 5 years because he wants to inform me about a call-back, most people would not consider it spam. If my ISP sends me an email about pencils, it is spam. If I cannot opt-out because I need my customer card to complete the procedure, it is spam.
Actually, and anyone at an ESP will tell you that, if the receiver thinks it is spam: it is. Because _that will_ hurt your deliverability at the hotmails and yahoos of the world.
The cost you mention do not represent the actual costs of shipping stuff. Shipping a container which is not in a hurry is dirt cheap.
You could have deducted that yourself. How can a new system be shipped to Lagos from (lets say) China and cost $577. And then you mention shipping computers from the US to Lagos which would be twice (or more) as expensive (without the price of the hardware).
An algorithm is no different than a mechanism. An algorithm is required to obtain a result, a mechanism is required to obtain a result.
An apple is a fruit, a pear is a fruit. They are no different?
I would say that copyright is enough to cover
(x / 2 = y)
or
((x - 3) >> 1) + 1)
. I presume the copyright is long gone. But to say that a mathematical formula is a mechanism: There is no intermediary so you cannot call it a mechanism (and please don't confuse math with how math is implemented on a cpu).
Adding 1+1 is mathematically very different from the physical design (e.g. putting two things next to each other like 2 apples, 2 magnets or 2 elektrons).
Physically there are two things: the result and and the way that result was obtained.
Mathematically there is only one thing: the result. Software is a way that result can be calculated and it is already protected by copyright.
Software patents are not software patents but mathematical patents claiming to be software patents.
You are mixing 'browser' app and 'cloud' (where most people assume external cloud). They are not by definition coupled.
I do however think that many office applications, e.g. Excel and Word, will remain on the desktop for a long time.
Btw, the company I work at has http://www.reeleezee.nl/ for online bookkeeping (5M$ turnover / year). Most companies I worked at have external payrolling.
The 'kilometerheffing' or 'rekeningrijden', kilometer charge, is a system to replace road tax and the extra VAT (BPM=40%!) on a car. It is supposed to enter service in 2014 but because of non-governance a while back I suppose it is delayed.
How the pricing is determined: -type of fuel -type of engine/exhaust system (no particle filter == 2.5 ct/km) -place of the road (not sure if this in the current proposals) -time of day
The system makes having a car cheap and driving one expensive in congestion areas/time.
I think the system, which was publicized in 2010 (!), is a little unfair. I bought my car in 2009, which is without particle filter. I now face, without doing anything, a hefty 2.5ct/km tax. That is 875 euro per year for me. Tell me where I could have made a different decision.
Not much internet left if you pull the plug on all incoming and outgoing ip traffic. Or do you keep the local traffic?
I hope you don't think that cutting the lines to the rest of the world is enough.They tried it in all those African countries: It don't work. A couple of sat links and you are out of business.
Slashdot Mirror
you sound like a politician, to make things even more simple.
You are missing a lot of factors in the equation. Just naming one does not make a valid equation in this case, only an oversimplification.
They also have big 'safe' cages blocking view. If entities are on collision course then the angle doesn't change and you are not/less seen because the pedestrian only 'becomes bigger'. That is why a small change in speeds really helps.
If a company needs the math as an argument...
You only commit political suicide with _one_ idea if you have a 2 party system.
He would be against books because it contains too many ideas that can be freely reused. He would oppose forums on the internet because reviews from citizens cannot have a good quality and are bad for profession newspaper reviewers. And webshops should be forbidden: Bad for old fashion shops. And this email stuff costs too many jobs at the postal services.
Stop the efficiency!
Like any service (i.e. preventing bad voodoo) you cannot guarantee service levels without monitoring. Service == monitoring. Nice story: A Dutch army base had a lot of anti-nucleair protesters around an they often came in. It turned out that they changed the lock at one of the (never used) break-away doors. Monitor the lock.
or h20h30+oh-
Some Amsterdam prices:
non-peering prices are like this (jointtransit prices)
peering costs are something like this (nlix)
If you never sent any large quantities of mail, you do not have a good reputation (just 'no reputation'). Trying to send large quantities of mail is impossible to large parties. If you let a warm IP 'cool', its reputation is gone. It takes many months, or longer, to heat it up. One bad mailing = blacklistings (which are 1 to 3 days) + a hit in reputation.
They will probably just block entire /56 since this is the kind of assignment a customer can get. See here: ripe ncc ipv6 training material, page 8.
The funny thing is that the hotmails of the world do not have a AAAA records for their mail servers. That means no ipv6 spam server can reach them.
I hear a new scam born... And you invented it. That means you are responsible for all damage that results, right?
;-)
At least morally
That is half of the truth. The second part is content/applicability and ease of opt-out.
If my pencil-shop sends me an email after 5 years because he wants to sell a new one, it is spam. You don't expect it.
If my car-dealer sends me an email after 5 years because he wants to inform me about a call-back, most people would not consider it spam.
If my ISP sends me an email about pencils, it is spam.
If I cannot opt-out because I need my customer card to complete the procedure, it is spam.
Actually, and anyone at an ESP will tell you that, if the receiver thinks it is spam: it is. Because _that will_ hurt your deliverability at the hotmails and yahoos of the world.
Btw I'm in that business.
The cost you mention do not represent the actual costs of shipping stuff. Shipping a container which is not in a hurry is dirt cheap.
You could have deducted that yourself. How can a new system be shipped to Lagos from (lets say) China and cost $577. And then you mention shipping computers from the US to Lagos which would be twice (or more) as expensive (without the price of the hardware).
UPS is ripping you off.
Your logic is failing you here:
An algorithm is no different than a mechanism. An algorithm is required to obtain a result, a mechanism is required to obtain a result.
An apple is a fruit, a pear is a fruit. They are no different?
I would say that copyright is enough to cover
(x / 2 = y)
or
((x - 3) >> 1) + 1)
. I presume the copyright is long gone. But to say that a mathematical formula is a mechanism: There is no intermediary so you cannot call it a mechanism (and please don't confuse math with how math is implemented on a cpu).
Adding 1+1 is mathematically very different from the physical design (e.g. putting two things next to each other like 2 apples, 2 magnets or 2 elektrons).
Physically there are two things: the result and and the way that result was obtained.
Mathematically there is only one thing: the result. Software is a way that result can be calculated and it is already protected by copyright.
Software patents are not software patents but mathematical patents claiming to be software patents.
You are mixing 'browser' app and 'cloud' (where most people assume external cloud). They are not by definition coupled.
I do however think that many office applications, e.g. Excel and Word, will remain on the desktop for a long time.
Btw, the company I work at has http://www.reeleezee.nl/ for online bookkeeping (5M$ turnover / year). Most companies I worked at have external payrolling.
Interactivity and control.
Most people don't need it doing business work. Your example is the corner case.
You are being an arrogant prick and your id is too high to back it up.
The same way you do offline phoning... lol.
That is why I use https searches on Google...
The 'kilometerheffing' or 'rekeningrijden', kilometer charge, is a system to replace road tax and the extra VAT (BPM=40%!) on a car. It is supposed to enter service in 2014 but because of non-governance a while back I suppose it is delayed.
How the pricing is determined:
-type of fuel
-type of engine/exhaust system (no particle filter == 2.5 ct/km)
-place of the road (not sure if this in the current proposals)
-time of day
The system makes having a car cheap and driving one expensive in congestion areas/time.
I think the system, which was publicized in 2010 (!), is a little unfair. I bought my car in 2009, which is without particle filter. I now face, without doing anything, a hefty 2.5ct/km tax. That is 875 euro per year for me. Tell me where I could have made a different decision.
Not much internet left if you pull the plug on all incoming and outgoing ip traffic. Or do you keep the local traffic?
I hope you don't think that cutting the lines to the rest of the world is enough.They tried it in all those African countries: It don't work. A couple of sat links and you are out of business.
Young padawan, there are many sorts of virtualization.
I can't believe you haven't been modded insightful yet... Head on.