Like I said in another post, I wouldn't trust the current materials with combustion temps and pressures. Making an extended magazine release, though, is entirely within the realm of possibility. As for the legality, people have been making AR-15s from 80% receivers for years. It's entirely legal per the BATF, though I haven't had a chance/need to catch up on the latest police state law in CA.
For the upper receiver, sure. The lower receiver houses the trigger group, mag release, and a few other things that don't operate under the firing pressure. Would I trust current filament with this? Maybe, maybe not. I still like that the plans are out, though.
That was a really interesting concession, because otherwise the government would've run afoul of U.S. v. Miller, which found that gun control was not a violation of rights if the weapon in question was not militarily useful.
Which well regulated militia are you a member of again?
Well, I've been in the Navy for 24 years, so...
Also, there's plenty of literature that "well regulated" means that the people ought to be a match for any standing army (cf. Hamilton, The Federalist No. 29).
I have to jump through more hoops to get a drivers license than to carry a deadly weapon whose sole purpose is to kill...
A driver's license is not a right. Nor is a firearm's sole purpose to kill. I've shot thousands of rounds over the years and not one has killed a single living thing. As far as regulating without abridging, I suggest you look in places like CA, DC, and Chicago. I find it useful to compare the tactics of gun-grabbers with those of anti-abortionists; they may not push for an outright ban, but they'll certainly try to regulate it out of existence.
Wait, I thought the police were the hated enemy? Now you want them to do your bidding? Oh, I get it, you don't want police, but you want to be in charge of a police state. Got it.
Fires have TFRs in place to keep non-responding aircraft out. All the responding aircraft are VFR traffic and coordinating amongst themselves, not with ATC.
Sure, might as well. By now, you've removed any semblance of childhood from a school and are now actively preparing them for life in a police state, where every action is monitored, every stranger a killer. You will not like the voting trend when they turn 18.
Otherwise, hell no. Update textbooks, get supplies in the classroom, boost teacher wages, maybe do an efficiency study to see how many "administrators" can be chopped. IOW, there are other things with higher-priorities than the latest opportunity for graft and control.
Slashdot Mirror
Reaching back a bit, but Korean shopowners used them very effectively to defend their shops/homes during the Rodney King riots.
I use mine for 3-gun competitions but I also do Civilian Marksmanship Program competitions...trying to get on a Navy shooting team to go to the national competition in Camp Perry, Ohio.
It's got to do with the speed of the bullet and how it tears through flesh leaving a wide hole).
Where do you get your information? Everything in that sentence is wrong.
Like I said in another post, I wouldn't trust the current materials with combustion temps and pressures. Making an extended magazine release, though, is entirely within the realm of possibility. As for the legality, people have been making AR-15s from 80% receivers for years. It's entirely legal per the BATF, though I haven't had a chance/need to catch up on the latest police state law in CA.
For the upper receiver, sure. The lower receiver houses the trigger group, mag release, and a few other things that don't operate under the firing pressure. Would I trust current filament with this? Maybe, maybe not. I still like that the plans are out, though.
That was a really interesting concession, because otherwise the government would've run afoul of U.S. v. Miller, which found that gun control was not a violation of rights if the weapon in question was not militarily useful.
Finally, a good reason to get that 3D printer!
Which well regulated militia are you a member of again?
Well, I've been in the Navy for 24 years, so... Also, there's plenty of literature that "well regulated" means that the people ought to be a match for any standing army (cf. Hamilton, The Federalist No. 29).
I have to jump through more hoops to get a drivers license than to carry a deadly weapon whose sole purpose is to kill...
A driver's license is not a right. Nor is a firearm's sole purpose to kill. I've shot thousands of rounds over the years and not one has killed a single living thing. As far as regulating without abridging, I suggest you look in places like CA, DC, and Chicago. I find it useful to compare the tactics of gun-grabbers with those of anti-abortionists; they may not push for an outright ban, but they'll certainly try to regulate it out of existence.
Remember kids, when they say "no one is coming for your guns," they really mean "we're totally coming for your guns."
The Left won't like living under the rules they created.
...when it will likely just go in a case anyway?
So...he can't sue or he'll be fired?
Entering a country without permission is not a human right.
There's more to being a refugee than being really really ridiculously good-looking. Even if they are wearing Derelicte.
The thought that people *only* touched that subway post must be very comforting...
It's just the usual projection, probably because of Kennedy. Haven't seen liberals this worked up about SCOTUS since a black guy was put on it.
Because out-of-control aircraft are equally hazardous.
The FAA suspended that after the U.S. District Court slapped their hand.
Wait, I thought the police were the hated enemy? Now you want them to do your bidding? Oh, I get it, you don't want police, but you want to be in charge of a police state. Got it.
BASH is absolutely a hazard and drones can easily fit inside that category.
Fires have TFRs in place to keep non-responding aircraft out. All the responding aircraft are VFR traffic and coordinating amongst themselves, not with ATC.
I'm betting "Super Smash the Patriarchy!" will be quite popular with the kids.
Depopulation is a key plank in the enviro platform. The deaths resulting from banning petrol is a feature to them, not a bug.
genocide might be required to make the math work.
Eggs, omelet, repeat as necessary.
Otherwise, hell no. Update textbooks, get supplies in the classroom, boost teacher wages, maybe do an efficiency study to see how many "administrators" can be chopped. IOW, there are other things with higher-priorities than the latest opportunity for graft and control.