This program is valid C and, when saved as "test2.java", valid java code. Compilation with the C compiler results in a program that doesn't behave the same way if it were compiled with java:
//\ /* #include "stdio.h" /**///\ public class test2 {
I'm asking the same. The movie's creators know they are featured on/.. It is possible they read through the comments. They'll see Hulu is very unpopular. I'd like to ask them why they have chosen Hulu and not another, more international website, like youtube with ads enabled, for example.
The baseband is not an hardware-ASIC, but runs completely in software, on a general purpose CPU. And the biggest problem is missing legislation to allow for open source mobile basebands.
Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
Are you reffering to copyright or patents? Second are monopolistic, true, but copyright is not monopolistic at all: it allows for remixes, and implementations that do something the same way but are not just a simple copy.
Defective? Please name a better model. Current implementation has certain issues (terms too long for both patents and copyright, strongly national, problems with alternative models like open content, penalties far too high), but the principle itself isn't broken.
Why is it a "tyranny over the mind of man"? I'm not reffering to DRM or trolling patents (almost all software patents are trolling or defensive-trolling). I think copyright creates incentives to create Intellectual property. Would an author write a book when he knew he wouldn't get any money from its sales? Would you put research money into a drug when your competition could copy it the moment you release it to the market? What are your ideas to redesign these systems?
Wrong:): EU, and of coure I've seen public transport, but not used it on a daily basis except in my school time. You are true, my comment was on goods transport.
The classical path of industrialisation for a country was to first move large amounts of simple material (steel, coal, you name it) around, which become less and less the more basic infrastructure is rolled out. Then the economy concentrates more and more on more sophisticated materials and technology. The amounts get smaller, and the recipients get more.
For highly developed countries, trains are no solution.
They fit very well for the time of industrialisation: no complicated machinery is needed for their setup, and they are ideal to move big amounts of material around, and between seldom changing parties. However, trains are not ideal for the transportation of small amounts of stuff. They need train stations, and are large and have a strict schedule.
Perhaps trains can be utilized in some areas, but in most, cars are better for an industrialized society. The fuel problem will be solved as soon as we have unlimited energy from fusion.
You know with the fingerprint databases the US and others have, and this "new" (its already quite old, but does that matter, I was against it when it was introduced, so it is new) EU regulation that introduces fingerprints into passports, I don't know how much they should collect more... Giving my fingerprint to the government brings no use to me, but knowing my DNA uses me more than anyone else. I rather know my own DNA and have the risk of the government knowing it too, as not knowing it with the same risk.
Having your sequenced DNA at hand can be very interesting I think. Although I don't know of any "manual" that helps me to read it. Does anyone know of a good database that collects the scientific data about the genome? You know, something like 23andme, just offline and without google?
just ask the user whether they want that second keyboard, network card, or mouse attached. And a malicious DNS server is also not the thing that doesn't let me sleep at night -- https was designed for that.
3.) makes it clear you don't understand how tor works. You can configure as many TOR nodes as you wish. There are points speaking for, and others speaking against your suggestion.
2.) TOR money better should go into the number of TOR relays first, not senseless camouflage traffic.
When adverts from well known brands appear on illegal websites, they lend them a look of legitimacy and inadvertently fool consumers into thinking the site is authentic
A smart move to place the police logo onto the site -- Users will think that when police vouches for it, it must have spying features, and leave the page.
But seriously: When they have control over the ad networks, they can simply take down the entire website: the ad networks have full access to the DOM. Why don't they try that?
Many times I've seen pieces of news about Amigas and usually they're warmly received (are they not outdated?).
The Amigas are outdated. However the stories are warmly recieved, because Amiga has been popular, and lots of people still have one in their basement. Palm OS wasn't this popular. People love their Amigas, Amiga became a part of culture. This has many reasons, not just popularity. The fanboy group for Palm OS is smaller but I doubt it doesn't exist. Its not mainstream culture though.
I don't know why you shouldn't "waste" your time learning about a dead platform. As long as you see it as your hobby. Some people like reenactments, and dress in historic uniforms to "play" historic battles. Others know every part of the steam engines used from 1860 to 1892 by Santa Fe. So why not Palm OS?
I don't think that we shouldn't cover animal experimentation with flower words. I've no doubt animal experiments are OK, as you've said they mostly help the health of humans, but we should at least name what we do to the animals by what it is. How would you call it?
Of course, an internet census is not such an "ethical" goal as healing people, so my comparison might be a bit shaky from this perspective.
What he did was illegal, and when he were found I'd have no problem of him being punished according to the law. But it is not unethic. Not when he uses default passwords, and creates no harm. No, I'm not.
Why is using idle machines of other people (he's used only machines whose load was under a certain threshold), more unethic than to torment and kill mice in the name of science? I don't think that, when used responsible, latter is unethic, but I wonder why do they put things above biological life?
When I've had no android, I've thought that too. But as I've purchased an android phone, I was quite impressed about the efficient and tight rights separation system of android. Don't misunderstand me: I didn't "activate" the play store app, as I needed to couple it with a google account. If you could install the free apps without an account I'd have tried it, but that way google had lost a customer. The next thing I was annoyed of was the samsung bloat, and the possible lock-in the case I really started to like one of those apps. I solved these two problems when I've installed CM and F-Droid. Of course, I can't install the fanciest whatsapp and so on, but at least I know my phone is truly mine (except for the baseband part), and that lock-ins are very hard. I was fascinated when I found out that every installed app has its own UNIX user assigned.
The rights separation in android is far more better than anything on the linux desktop. In X, every application can keylog me. In android, that's not possible. On the linux desktop, every application has access to all my files, including my.ssh directory.. In android, fs access is far more developed and limited. In linux desktop, every app has access to the webcam. In android, you can see which app has access. Of course, android could do better, perhaps by adding a "revoke right" option and an "always ask" option (osmand for example has a nice recorder feature, but most time I use it I don't need it so why does it have the right *all time*, rather let android ask for that permission the few times I need it), but right now it does best.
The most annoying features of the android ecosystem radiate from GAPPS, but almost none from AOSP.
OpenH264 only ships with a video decoder, no AAC audio decoder. The hack Cisco made with OpenH264 won't work, as the AAC licensing pool company removed caps. For WebRTC, this is no problem, as opus will be used as audio encoding. But MP4 won't work. Perhaps there is potential for a matroska-based h.264+opus format, as when IE and safari (which don't have opus for the audio element yet) implement WebRTC, they need opus encoders and decoders. Then its only a small step to support this mixed format.
Slashdot Mirror
This program is valid C and, when saved as "test2.java", valid java code. Compilation with the C compiler results in a program that doesn't behave the same way if it were compiled with java:
//\
//\
//\
/*
#include "stdio.h"
/**///\
public class test2 {
//\
public static
void main
(String[]a)//\
/*
(int argc, char *argv[])//*/
{
System.out.printf("hi, I'm java\n");/*
printf("hi, I'm C\n");//*/
}
//\
}
Good point.
I'm risking being modded flamebait, but EU has more, not very much, but still more:
EU: $17.36 trillion
US: $16.97 trillion
I'm asking the same. The movie's creators know they are featured on /.. It is possible they read through the comments. They'll see Hulu is very unpopular. I'd like to ask them why they have chosen Hulu and not another, more international website, like youtube with ads enabled, for example.
Yeah, only the government should be abled to do illegal things with that.
The baseband is not an hardware-ASIC, but runs completely in software, on a general purpose CPU. And the biggest problem is missing legislation to allow for open source mobile basebands.
Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
Are you reffering to copyright or patents? Second are monopolistic, true, but copyright is not monopolistic at all: it allows for remixes, and implementations that do something the same way but are not just a simple copy.
Defective? Please name a better model. Current implementation has certain issues (terms too long for both patents and copyright, strongly national, problems with alternative models like open content, penalties far too high), but the principle itself isn't broken.
Why is it a "tyranny over the mind of man"? I'm not reffering to DRM or trolling patents (almost all software patents are trolling or defensive-trolling). I think copyright creates incentives to create Intellectual property. Would an author write a book when he knew he wouldn't get any money from its sales? Would you put research money into a drug when your competition could copy it the moment you release it to the market? What are your ideas to redesign these systems?
Wrong :): EU, and of coure I've seen public transport, but not used it on a daily basis except in my school time. You are true, my comment was on goods transport.
The classical path of industrialisation for a country was to first move large amounts of simple material (steel, coal, you name it) around, which become less and less the more basic infrastructure is rolled out. Then the economy concentrates more and more on more sophisticated materials and technology. The amounts get smaller, and the recipients get more.
For highly developed countries, trains are no solution.
They fit very well for the time of industrialisation: no complicated machinery is needed for their setup, and they are ideal to move big amounts of material around, and between seldom changing parties.
However, trains are not ideal for the transportation of small amounts of stuff. They need train stations, and are large and have a strict schedule.
Perhaps trains can be utilized in some areas, but in most, cars are better for an industrialized society. The fuel problem will be solved as soon as we have unlimited energy from fusion.
You know with the fingerprint databases the US and others have, and this "new" (its already quite old, but does that matter, I was against it when it was introduced, so it is new) EU regulation that introduces fingerprints into passports, I don't know how much they should collect more... Giving my fingerprint to the government brings no use to me, but knowing my DNA uses me more than anyone else. I rather know my own DNA and have the risk of the government knowing it too, as not knowing it with the same risk.
Having your sequenced DNA at hand can be very interesting I think. Although I don't know of any "manual" that helps me to read it. Does anyone know of a good database that collects the scientific data about the genome? You know, something like 23andme, just offline and without google?
just ask the user whether they want that second keyboard, network card, or mouse attached. And a malicious DNS server is also not the thing that doesn't let me sleep at night -- https was designed for that.
3.) makes it clear you don't understand how tor works. You can configure as many TOR nodes as you wish. There are points speaking for, and others speaking against your suggestion.
2.) TOR money better should go into the number of TOR relays first, not senseless camouflage traffic.
Gonna love a linus rant on this...
apparently 3 proxies aren't enough, should rather be 7 :-)
When adverts from well known brands appear on illegal websites, they lend them a look of legitimacy and inadvertently fool consumers into thinking the site is authentic
A smart move to place the police logo onto the site -- Users will think that when police vouches for it, it must have spying features, and leave the page.
But seriously: When they have control over the ad networks, they can simply take down the entire website: the ad networks have full access to the DOM. Why don't they try that?
Many times I've seen pieces of news about Amigas and usually they're warmly received (are they not outdated?).
The Amigas are outdated. However the stories are warmly recieved, because Amiga has been popular, and lots of people still have one in their basement. Palm OS wasn't this popular. People love their Amigas, Amiga became a part of culture. This has many reasons, not just popularity. The fanboy group for Palm OS is smaller but I doubt it doesn't exist. Its not mainstream culture though.
I don't know why you shouldn't "waste" your time learning about a dead platform. As long as you see it as your hobby. Some people like reenactments, and dress in historic uniforms to "play" historic battles. Others know every part of the steam engines used from 1860 to 1892 by Santa Fe. So why not Palm OS?
I don't think that we shouldn't cover animal experimentation with flower words. I've no doubt animal experiments are OK, as you've said they mostly help the health of humans, but we should at least name what we do to the animals by what it is. How would you call it?
Of course, an internet census is not such an "ethical" goal as healing people, so my comparison might be a bit shaky from this perspective.
What he did was illegal, and when he were found I'd have no problem of him being punished according to the law. But it is not unethic. Not when he uses default passwords, and creates no harm.
No, I'm not.
Why is using idle machines of other people (he's used only machines whose load was under a certain threshold), more unethic than to torment and kill mice in the name of science? I don't think that, when used responsible, latter is unethic, but I wonder why do they put things above biological life?
When I've had no android, I've thought that too. But as I've purchased an android phone, I was quite impressed about the efficient and tight rights separation system of android. Don't misunderstand me: I didn't "activate" the play store app, as I needed to couple it with a google account. If you could install the free apps without an account I'd have tried it, but that way google had lost a customer. The next thing I was annoyed of was the samsung bloat, and the possible lock-in the case I really started to like one of those apps. I solved these two problems when I've installed CM and F-Droid. Of course, I can't install the fanciest whatsapp and so on, but at least I know my phone is truly mine (except for the baseband part), and that lock-ins are very hard. I was fascinated when I found out that every installed app has its own UNIX user assigned.
The rights separation in android is far more better than anything on the linux desktop. In X, every application can keylog me. In android, that's not possible. On the linux desktop, every application has access to all my files, including my .ssh directory.. In android, fs access is far more developed and limited. In linux desktop, every app has access to the webcam. In android, you can see which app has access. Of course, android could do better, perhaps by adding a "revoke right" option and an "always ask" option (osmand for example has a nice recorder feature, but most time I use it I don't need it so why does it have the right *all time*, rather let android ask for that permission the few times I need it), but right now it does best.
The most annoying features of the android ecosystem radiate from GAPPS, but almost none from AOSP.
And, Linus actually used asterisks, just placed another way:
Ok, so I'm looking at the code generation and your compiler is pure
and utter *shit*.
End result, the GCC people will fix this bug in short order (what are GCC point releases for anyway)
The bug was reported 4 point releases ago. It just now started effecting the kernel.
In fact, it has been fixed in trunk even before Linus' rant.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s...
The normal evolutionary mutations happen only in (proto-)gamet cells. Cancer mutations happen mostly in non-gamet cells.
I have DNS in my home network, using the hosts file of my openwrt router.
Noted, should have used another tense in the subject.
OpenH264 only ships with a video decoder, no AAC audio decoder. The hack Cisco made with OpenH264 won't work, as the AAC licensing pool company removed caps. For WebRTC, this is no problem, as opus will be used as audio encoding.
But MP4 won't work. Perhaps there is potential for a matroska-based h.264+opus format, as when IE and safari (which don't have opus for the audio element yet) implement WebRTC, they need opus encoders and decoders. Then its only a small step to support this mixed format.