The probable cause standard is more important in Criminal Law than it is in Civil Law because it is used in criminal law as a basis for searching and arresting persons and depriving them of their liberty. Civil cases can deprive a person of property, but they cannot deprive a person of liberty. In civil court a plaintiff must possess probable cause to levy a claim against a defendant.
The accused is not bound to preserve any and all possessions that might be discoverable in litigation at a later date after even a rumour that the accused will become a party in a suit.
Evidence does not exist before probable cause defines the scope of what will constitute evidence, only after a motion to preserve evidence is filed.
I put in a list of items I'm interested in as I go about my day. Toilet paper, floss, pork & beans, taters, batteries (AA), crème brûlée, washer for the faucet...
While traveling around doing other stuff, this app barks that I am in the vicinity of Rao's Bakery and they have crème brûlée. On another day, I'm gassing up and "BARK!" they have pork & beans inside the store.
I could decline: 1.) Not now 2.) Not this store (and that store is blacklisted for that item).
The problem with the NSA is not that it is collecting massive amounts of metadata, capturing phone calls or intercepting Internet activity... it's that ANYBODY KNOWS ABOUT IT!!!
Same with the FBI and CIA.
America used to have intelligence... the "intel" kind.
Extrapolating human longevity based on that of the dinosaurs is vacuous because the mass extinction 65 million years ago was a random catastrophic event.
I'm a photographer, so I know something about this. If a large outfit uses one of my photos in an ad and I send them a take down request, they can simply demand that I meet them in court.
They, having the deeper pockets, would get a pass.
Slashdot Mirror
It's a fuzzy clock in this natter, as TFA makes clear.
Probable cause does exist in civil cases.
The probable cause standard is more important in Criminal Law than it is in Civil Law because it is used in criminal law as a basis for searching and arresting persons and depriving them of their liberty. Civil cases can deprive a person of property, but they cannot deprive a person of liberty. In civil court a plaintiff must possess probable cause to levy a claim against a defendant.
Not this.
The accused is not bound to preserve any and all possessions that might be discoverable in litigation at a later date after even a rumour that the accused will become a party in a suit.
Evidence does not exist before probable cause defines the scope of what will constitute evidence, only after a motion to preserve evidence is filed.
What's next, apparently, is you go for twoliners.
I put in a list of items I'm interested in as I go about my day. Toilet paper, floss, pork & beans, taters, batteries (AA), crème brûlée, washer for the faucet ...
While traveling around doing other stuff, this app barks that I am in the vicinity of Rao's Bakery and they have crème brûlée. On another day, I'm gassing up and "BARK!" they have pork & beans inside the store.
I could decline: 1.) Not now 2.) Not this store (and that store is blacklisted for that item).
I could blacklist any store. I hate Walmart.
For planned trips, this is a useless idea. There IS an app for what you're thinking and it's name is "vacay."
You'll get better.
Perhaps to you ...
Survival is avoiding the ending of the goal.
Scientists describe virtually everything that is alive as animal or plant. So, if you’re not a plant then you are an animal!
Circular.
Those are Google and Yahoo!
Thanks for playing.
We have some swell parting gifts.
I agree. Look at trolling. Trolling is a norm that we just step around, like avoiding bullshit in a pleasant meadow.
Would you please expand on that for those of us who are unfamiliar with the reference?
I, too, find work or play or grocery shopping to be mentally unstimulating.
Actually, the "yet" is here, now that you know about it.
By random cyclically recurring, do you mean like synchronizing random noise?
The problem with the NSA is not that it is collecting massive amounts of metadata, capturing phone calls or intercepting Internet activity ... it's that ANYBODY KNOWS ABOUT IT!!!
Same with the FBI and CIA.
America used to have intelligence ... the "intel" kind.
Our secret service got no fucking street cred.
Your basic point is well taken.
Not all dinosaurs were killed. The tree variety made it.
So, catastrophic event, or evolution, or technical advances, ... we cannot predict.
by ebacon (16101) Alter Relationship on Friday January 02, 2015 @06:35PM (#48721439)
by thegarbz (1787294) Alter Relationship on Friday January 02, 2015 @06:35PM (#48721445)
The end goal is survival.
Extrapolating human longevity based on that of the dinosaurs is vacuous because the mass extinction 65 million years ago was a random catastrophic event.
No.
The outcome is the same, but POTUS is simply anti-NK for political reasons and stuff.
That's just as often the other way around.
I'm a photographer, so I know something about this. If a large outfit uses one of my photos in an ad and I send them a take down request, they can simply demand that I meet them in court.
They, having the deeper pockets, would get a pass.
I've seen /. do that a lot.
Rhyme unintentional until after the fact, in which case I claim © 2015.
... the hackers implicate NK because, well, NK.
The NKs deny and threaten.
The FBI says NK is "implicated."
POTUS reads that as, "We have evidence."
Norse says it's an inside job.
POTUS hits NK with sanctions because, well, NK.
Did /. author any of TFAs?