Generally, in Texas, recording conversations is acceptable only when one of the participants is aware of the recording.
For instance, I can be talking to you on the sidewalk and turn my iPhone recorder on and we're good. I don't need your knowledge or consent.
What I can't do is leave my iPhone in record mode and leave while you talk to another person. I am not participating, and neither of you guys have knowledge, either.
For the peace of mind of all parties, it's best to be transparent as when an insurance company calls me for an interview regarding a traffic accident I witnessed.
I consent over, and over, and over again.
It's admissible in court because both parties have knowledge and consent.
Appreciate that involving minors can complicate things, and so can certain social mores.
For instance, even in my home, I can't record someone using the bathroom without their knowledge and consent. If they are a minor, they cannot be a party to a contract and can therefore, cannot grant consent.
... what with the state of education in the US, not only do we not have people with computer talent, we no longer have computer people capable of hacking.
The good news is that all Americans have been removed from the no-fly list.
I don't know bullshit from wild honey about Linux, but the attack on the DoD is looking for Telnet.
Analysing the malware sample in a sandbox, we saw that the malware has conducted a massive scan on the United States Department of Defence Internet Protocol address range on port 23 TCP or Telnet for brute force attack purposes,"...
Slashdot Mirror
The "pointing out" part is no good. It's he said/she said and not admissible.
A sticker, prominently displayed, "This vehicle monitored by video and audio recording," is sufficient.
Clarification is location/situation specific.
Generally, in Texas, recording conversations is acceptable only when one of the participants is aware of the recording.
For instance, I can be talking to you on the sidewalk and turn my iPhone recorder on and we're good. I don't need your knowledge or consent.
What I can't do is leave my iPhone in record mode and leave while you talk to another person. I am not participating, and neither of you guys have knowledge, either.
For the peace of mind of all parties, it's best to be transparent as when an insurance company calls me for an interview regarding a traffic accident I witnessed.
I consent over, and over, and over again.
It's admissible in court because both parties have knowledge and consent.
Appreciate that involving minors can complicate things, and so can certain social mores.
For instance, even in my home, I can't record someone using the bathroom without their knowledge and consent. If they are a minor, they cannot be a party to a contract and can therefore, cannot grant consent.
And I predict a "blacklist" database to go with it.
That god has been replaced by Google
There's a right way to use "then," and another way that makes the world laugh at you.
... what with the state of education in the US, not only do we not have people with computer talent, we no longer have computer people capable of hacking.
The good news is that all Americans have been removed from the no-fly list.
The bad news is that we're screwed.
Or at least give the Native Americans back their religion.
To clarify:
Each /8 block contains 16,777,216 addresses.
I don't know bullshit from wild honey about Linux, but the attack on the DoD is looking for Telnet.
Analysing the malware sample in a sandbox, we saw that the malware has conducted a massive scan on the United States Department of Defence Internet Protocol address range on port 23 TCP or Telnet for brute force attack purposes," ...
From TFA:
The US DoD network in question is the 215.0.0.0/8 range, with approximately 16.7 addresses.
Bold is mine.
... how many Linux servers are there?
... these guys are professionals at stunts and stuff. Let the pros experience, and absorb the consequences and work the bugs out for the rest of us.
Appreciate that these things aren't really, "drones," they are "model airplanes."
It's going to be a boon to FAA bureaucracy and a great venture to tax.
Manning tried to impress an actual hacker and the hacker dude didn't want any part of it.
Snowden grabbed the goods and and made headlines across the planet.
Why in Sam Hill do whistle blowers have to step into the spotlight with their incriminating evidence?
There are lots of ways to drop that crap off and be quiet about it.
The system is training for that, you know. It's the next logical step.
Want to expose a wrongdoing?
Wear the cloak of AC.
I want something a little more dense ...
You already have that. It's holding your mouse.
... the devices don't do much.
When the technology goes airborne, and starts performing miracles of a semi-religious nature, it's all about what it can DO.
If I had mod, I'd give a +1 Insightful ...
... a money back guarantee.
Show me ONE creation theory that can be tested.
Draw a bright line.
On one side, write, "religion," on the other side, "science."
Make sure they don't cross-contaminate.
I have to think of everything.
But which creation theory would you teach?
Be careful in your answer ... my question is a trap.
Hence the idiotic, pseudo-intellectual "I Fucking Love Science" Facebook posts that flood my feed with juvenile memes and puns.
How juvenile that you allow this.
And we didn't even get a kiss.
If today is opposite day, I am.
You'll be living tomorrow, though ... right?
We all can see into the future. Advertisers are going to deliver their content to your browser FIRST, and then the content will follow.
We've already been through this.
Perform the following experiment as a predictive exercise to explain what will happen when you use an ad blocker in the future:
In your browser, disable cookies.
Then navigate to sites.
Enable cookies.
Document the experience.