Yeah, "... In essence, we have finally built the transcontinental railroad, and now we can use it to completely transform our Wild West."
There are tunnels filled with dynamite all underneath the track just waiting for some wild west yahoo to push the detonator.
Once a month, Microsoft issues security blankets in an effort to hide them.
Until that problem is solved at the roadbed, no one's going to get a good night's sleep because those bird whistles you hear are not authentic, Kemo Sabe.
The sentence would take about 40 tresvigintillion years to crack on a PC. The web site, as password, would take about 837 quintillion years (both estimates are according to this site.)
NSA's grab of data is one debate that has nothing to do with Snowden. That grabbing is still there and will continue to bet there. It was going on before Snowden ever showed up.
More upsetting to me than grabbing big data is the government's failure to learn from Manning regarding how many worker ants have access to the big data.
Snowden (and Manning) walked in; got the stuff; and walked out.
THAT's the larger problem which continues today.
Both Snowden and Manning are so last year. Snowden's value now is for Russians to trot him out now and then, much like the Republicans put Lewinski on the runway in an effort to discolour Hillary.
Again, we need to keep our eye on the ball and it's the little round thing.
Apparently, we have another Snowden mole. Who's to blame for that incompetence?
I'm with you on this. For individuals, the free version expires after 30 days AND they state that, because of the size of the data, it will take a while.
Slashdot Mirror
... this? Just no.
Peer-to-peer based on trust.
What could possibly go wrong?
... capacity for any recreational activities.
Yeah, "... In essence, we have finally built the transcontinental railroad, and now we can use it to completely transform our Wild West."
There are tunnels filled with dynamite all underneath the track just waiting for some wild west yahoo to push the detonator.
Once a month, Microsoft issues security blankets in an effort to hide them.
Until that problem is solved at the roadbed, no one's going to get a good night's sleep because those bird whistles you hear are not authentic, Kemo Sabe.
.revelc woh ...
Please step away from the camera ...
Well, let's look at the pattern in an attempt to predict the future:
Manning walks in and gets the data. Government doesn't learn from that ...
Snowden walks in and gets the data. Government doesn't learn from that ...
Now this guy ...
... the NSA ... what could possibly go wrong?
Well, it USED to be so, but not so much anymore, I think.
Bolted on to the dictionary hack is the "M!sp3ii3d" run.
I think sentences would be OK. Because of proper case and punctuation, a dictionary hack would take some time.
Also, a brilliant idea I came up with is to use web sites that relate, in some way, to the app or web page I'm trying to get into.
For instance for Facebook, a sentence ... "I love Facebook but it takes up a lot of my time."
or
http://www.timesuck.com/
The sentence would take about 40 tresvigintillion years to crack on a PC. The web site, as password, would take about 837 quintillion years (both estimates are according to this site.)
Biometrics is a great idea to ensure that people are in direct proximity of the device, but what about all the remote control I do?
Agreed. Very few girls will excel at code, most will be mediocre and even moster will hate it.
EXPOSE girls to code and cull out the ones who get it and encourage them to move forward.
If coding's not right, immerse them in something else until their eyes light up and their hearts sing.
... and what about the sleeze buckets?
"Yes, dear, I have been assigned to you. Now, if you'll just slip out of the robe ..."
You make good points, but I think they are aimed at the wrong target.
This latest "leaker," is an unknown, so let's wait and see on that one.
The larger point is that, for sensitive information, we have to have controls and monitors in place.
Manning went to work with a Lady Gaga playlist and walked out with the stash.
Snowden walked in and out, too.
For classified information, don't you think it's important to guard it?
... because everyone on Facebook has to use their real name and stuff.
They taught me how to tell the difference between bullshit and wild honey.
It's not a matter of ethics, trust, patriotism, or morals.
It's about having the sense god gave a piss ant to restrict access to information you never wanted three (3) people to divulge.
... not taking the test.
... the early birds showed up.
NSA's grab of data is one debate that has nothing to do with Snowden. That grabbing is still there and will continue to bet there. It was going on before Snowden ever showed up.
More upsetting to me than grabbing big data is the government's failure to learn from Manning regarding how many worker ants have access to the big data.
Snowden (and Manning) walked in; got the stuff; and walked out.
THAT's the larger problem which continues today.
Both Snowden and Manning are so last year. Snowden's value now is for Russians to trot him out now and then, much like the Republicans put Lewinski on the runway in an effort to discolour Hillary.
Again, we need to keep our eye on the ball and it's the little round thing.
Apparently, we have another Snowden mole. Who's to blame for that incompetence?
I'm with you on this. For individuals, the free version expires after 30 days AND they state that, because of the size of the data, it will take a while.
My guess is a little more than 30 days.
Recall that we learned all we to know about theft in kindergarten.
The choice is clear: Pay up or steal.
China?
Sorry, but when it takes that much narrative, it's because the guy was stealing.
"China seems to be on a mission to isolate itself from the world, at least in terms of technology."
They didn't say that. They said they don't want GUBMINT to use APPLE stuff. That doesn't shut down China's entire technology capability.
There are other people in China.
Wrong.
The "available options," belong to the vendor until the customer pays for them.
Right?