It may actually be a good point that the USPS should be charging Amazon more, but that common sense approach would have to apply to EVERY company and individual that ships a package via USPS.
Amazon is on track to provide its own delivery system. including the last mile.
The monopolistic ambiance of commerce regulators will allow it and USPS, UPS, and FedEx will hurt like hell, just as retail has, because of the "Amazon Effect."
Slashdot Mirror
This is my surprised look on my face that you have a surprised look on your face. lol
it's unconstitutional. It's against the law to write laws that single out an individual or individual group.
Really?
Felons, as a group and as individuals can't own or be in possession of guns.
Prisoners, as a group or an individuals, are not free to assemble or roam about the country.
Children, as a group and as individuals, cannot own a beer joint
You make extend the list
It's true that I never grabbed you.
Because transparency.
Maybe you missed the goddam point that the pussy grabbing asshat was taking a jab at WaPo.
You're not agreeing with him.
He can't talk about Amazon and exclude all others.
It's not a matter of, "... the largest companies ..." it's "all companies and individuals."
Let Amazon create their own delivery service from point A-Z.
Then, like their AWS, they will ramp a whole (foods) new disruptive industry.
It's worse than that.
It may actually be a good point that the USPS should be charging Amazon more, but that common sense approach would have to apply to EVERY company and individual that ships a package via USPS.
Amazon is on track to provide its own delivery system. including the last mile.
The monopolistic ambiance of commerce regulators will allow it and USPS, UPS, and FedEx will hurt like hell, just as retail has, because of the "Amazon Effect."
Well said.
... pot.
I remember when the music died.
Unless you documented the "before," and the "after," and then pulled the "after," and observed the "before," you do not see evidence all around.
OK, that made me laugh.
It's not survival of the fittest. It's survival of the survivors who can reproduce survivors that survive to reproduce survivors ...
Today we have survivors who are certainly no the fittest.
We nurture those who would have, and did, perish a century ago. We assign special protections in many cases.
Survival has never been about the "fittest," anyway.
It's been about those who adapt to the changing environment through "luck," called "mutation."
Evolution ends for the sentient as soon as they become sentient. ~ © 2017 CaptainDork
Kinda like Leonardo da Vinci.
... is on the part of the social media -- not the users of same.
... 10,000 is way too small a number to stop disparagement of pussy-grabbers because people like me have copied the evidence to several places.
Trump Lewd Conversation about Women
Or First Lady Lesbian Photos.
... is contract law.
I don't have a problem with the ISP, but I have a problem with the ToS.
Copyright owners should be going directly after the perpetrators.
Why don't we have a ToS with the electric company that NO powered devices will work if we violate copyright?
... what did you say?
... shredding a Fender on a track.
But they will.
You don't provide any citations.
Gotta look at the numbers.
There are a shit-load more idle chargers than there will ever be mining rigs.
... Facebook, I'm OK with it.