How to complain about the articles that are totally misleading?
for example: consider an article submitted by timothy Carbon Dating Shows Koran May Predate Muhammad 304. If you will check the date of the parchment in the original article it is AD 568 and 645, on the other hand the date given in timothy's article is 545 AD and 568. This typo in date changes the meaning of the news, probably misleading entirely... The dates from original news speaks exactly opposite of the title submitted by timothy
Also who will take the responsibility of spreading wrong information?
original article link: http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/ne...
This self-healing concrete only heals its crack, but when small of concrete breaks apart from the parent it wont be able to make itself to original shape
every step towards automation is said to be useful for some purpose; but the problem is that it will not only be used for good purpose but also for crime, and thats where things get complicated: is technology solving problems or creating more?
watching porn (or simply, people having sex, romance) is not allowed by many religions long time ago! so the point is its better to follow, at least one, religion and learn from it, you will always be in safer side
No ! United States presidential election actually is not democratic !
The election of the President of the United States is an indirect vote in which citizens cast ballots for a slate of members of the U.S. Electoral College; these electors in turn directly elect the President. So the president is _chosen_ to implement the policies in favour of _gaint_ corporates. So it does not matter who is the president, all of them will doing the _job_ they are chosen for.
do they mean shortened url pointing to malware affected websites?
to stop crime or create surveillance state ?
so america not only owns all the countries on this earth but also space... wtf?!?!?!
now since this move may hurt tech gaints' (from US) business, this will teach them a lesson on user privacy
How to complain about the articles that are totally misleading? for example: consider an article submitted by timothy Carbon Dating Shows Koran May Predate Muhammad 304. If you will check the date of the parchment in the original article it is AD 568 and 645, on the other hand the date given in timothy's article is 545 AD and 568. This typo in date changes the meaning of the news, probably misleading entirely... The dates from original news speaks exactly opposite of the title submitted by timothy Also who will take the responsibility of spreading wrong information? original article link: http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/ne...
to sum up! government in US kill people in their homeland (cops killing innocent people) as well as abroad (bombing Middle East).
they could have saved some money by using plastic; scientist not so smart han ;-)
This self-healing concrete only heals its crack, but when small of concrete breaks apart from the parent it wont be able to make itself to original shape
every step towards automation is said to be useful for some purpose; but the problem is that it will not only be used for good purpose but also for crime, and thats where things get complicated: is technology solving problems or creating more?
no windows? does this mean we have to take permission from car to get out? we are making prison for ourselves and they are over taking us!
watching porn (or simply, people having sex, romance) is not allowed by many religions long time ago! so the point is its better to follow, at least one, religion and learn from it, you will always be in safer side
about time to become independent and make surveillance harder
I feel bad cs1.6 competitions are not played in international matches anymore. I am a fan of cs1.6 (and not GO)
No ! United States presidential election actually is not democratic ! The election of the President of the United States is an indirect vote in which citizens cast ballots for a slate of members of the U.S. Electoral College; these electors in turn directly elect the President. So the president is _chosen_ to implement the policies in favour of _gaint_ corporates. So it does not matter who is the president, all of them will doing the _job_ they are chosen for.
" so they can see if any of the patches accidentally break anything for home users before trying them out."