Slashdot Mirror


Biologists Create Self-Healing Concrete

Mr.Intel writes: A team of microbiologists from the Delft University of Technology claims to have invented "bioconcrete" — concrete that heals cracks and breaks using bacteria. The goal was to find a type of bacteria that could live inside concrete and also produce small amount of limestone that could re-seal cracks. This is a difficult prospect because concrete is quite dry and strongly alkaline. The bacteria needed to be able to stay alive for years in those conditions before being activated by water. The bacteria also need a food source — simply adding sugar to concrete will make it weak. The scientists used calcium lactate instead, adding biodegradable capsules of it to the concrete mix. "When cracks eventually begin to form in the concrete, water enters and open the capsules. The bacteria then germinate, multiply and feed on the lactate, and in doing so they combine the calcium with carbonate ions to form calcite, or limestone, which closes up the cracks."

94 comments

  1. Amazing! by joebok · · Score: 2

    I'm all for it, as long as nothing could possibly go wrong!

    1. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is as planned. Prepare to bow to the concrete overlords.

    2. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bacteria won't take over the world, but people most likely will get complacent, and when there are no more bacteria to heal the concrete, entire civilisations will collapse like the buildings of Nepal, but without the earthquake.

    3. Re:Amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't let any of the Final Five near it.

  2. Those pour [sic] souls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    >The goal was to find a type of bacteria that could live inside concrete

    If you can call that "living." Think of the bacteria!

    1. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by Jhon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Humans have been living in concrete in NYC for over 100 years. They seem to enjoy it.

      Then again -- maybe that's why New Yorkers are so mean and rude...

    2. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      The Romans lived in concrete too, but they died

    3. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      interesting theory, could vegans use buildings made of this material? Or does their highfalutin standards only apply to multicellular creatures?

    4. Re: Those pour [sic] souls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh the ignorance...

    5. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Romans lived in concrete too, but they died

      I think that had more to do with their use of Lead for piping and the aqueduct.

    6. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Vegans must be in a quandary in general. To live, they must consume resources that one way or another kill animals (ecological destruction, oil use - spills, etc) but if they kill themselves, they take all their gut bacteria and other such human ecological systems with them.

    7. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by willworkforbeer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Current live webcam stream shows Romans still alive, thriving.

      --
      Pretending this is my office full of bitter coworkers..
    8. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by zlives · · Score: 0

      yet they die. so what would be most useful... ideologically at least, is to sterilize themselves as to not propagate the continued abuse.
      I wonder what vegan parents think of this?

    9. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by Jhon · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's why *THEY* were mean and rude!

    10. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Meh! Ship the whole lot back to Vega if they don't want to live here.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suffering must exist so make no effort to minimize it. First class logic.

    12. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by Gryle · · Score: 0

      I'd be interested in a survey of the Voluntary Human Extinction Project for the numbers of vegans amongst their ranks.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    13. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      They also used lead in paint, as a vessel liner for wine making, for plates, pots, and pans... and don't forget as a food additive...
      http://corrosion-doctors.org/Elements-Toxic/Lead-history.htm

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    14. Re: Those pour [sic] souls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are vegans so humourless?

    15. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      "I use electricity, and electricity has killed people, so I'm a murderer, and even if I kill myself others will use electricity at my funeral, which is more murder, so I might as well go around shooting people".

      You can always tell when somebody starts with a conclusion and works backwards.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    16. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by tsqr · · Score: 2

      If you can call that "living." Think of the bacteria!

      I believe you may have stumbled upon a new cause for PETA.

    17. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It turns out that Vegans are a diverse group, with diverse motivations. The definition is quite fuzzy, actually.

      Most vegans aren't actually in the "cannot kill anything that qualifies as an animal under any circumstance" extreme group. Many just want to reduce the amount of killing of complex (non-microscopic) animals, and they do that primarily by not eating them. Some vegans are not motivated by this concern at all: they have health reasons, or otherwise believe that an animal-free diet is healthier, but really don't care much about industrial use of animals.

    18. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Making lead the likely reason for the collapse of the Roman empire, strange that it should repeat again for the US empire, except this time via car exhausts.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      They also have an abundance of people who wear funny hats.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    20. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by Patabugen · · Score: 1

      interesting theory, could vegans use buildings made of this material? Or does their highfalutin standards only apply to multicellular creatures?

      Aww I was going to answer your question, but found it too highfalutin. So you'll have to do your own googling now.

    21. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by Patabugen · · Score: 1

      Vegans aim to minimise their use of animals as far as is practical and possible.

      It's not about being perfect, it's about trying to be less abusive by cutting out as many products which cause suffering as possible.

    22. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      Humans have been living in concrete in NYC for over 100 years. They seem to enjoy it.

      And they're quite good at sealing up cracks in concrete to! No bacteria needed, and no need for complicated feeding schemes. Just send the sealers to the next supermarket. (They even pay for the food themselves!)

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    23. Re:Those pour [sic] souls by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      I think that had more to do with their use of Lead for piping and the aqueduct.

      Lead piping and such is not that much of a danger. If it was we would all show lead levels in our blood, and we don't.

      The Romans discovered this really neat artificial sweetner, though. It was a lead compound and they used it in many their wines.
      -That- is what caused the problems!!

  3. Practical use by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here is what the scientists say about their work:

    Bacterial concrete is ideal for constructing underground retainers for hazardous waste, as no humans would have to go near it to repair any occurring cracks. For residential buildings, however, it does seem the traditional repairing of cracks will remain the most economically attractive solution for now.

    Currently, our research focuses on creating the right conditions for the bacteria to produce as much calcite as possible and on optimizing the distribution of food for the bacteria.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Practical use by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3

      It may not turn out to have many practical uses, but it sure is clever.

    2. Re:Practical use by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bacterial concrete is ideal for constructing underground retainers for hazardous waste

      Okay, so the bacteria are going to be in the walls, exposed to mutagens and/or radiation, and unobserved by humans for years at a time. I want movie rights!

    3. Re:Practical use by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Okay, so the bacteria are going to be in the walls, exposed to mutagens and/or radiation, and unobserved by humans for years at a time. I want movie rights!

      That basically describes how your walls are right now.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Practical use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of worried here. If the healing process requires water to enter the cracks, then storing hazard waste is probably not a good application.

  4. is this kinda/sorta like coral reefs? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    wonder if coral has ever been considered.

    1. Re:is this kinda/sorta like coral reefs? by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      Except I've heard that coral doesn't do well in the presence of water.

    2. Re:is this kinda/sorta like coral reefs? by zlives · · Score: 1

      i think you are thinking of land sharks

  5. contractor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I here the contractor now. I thought you told me you dug up the road yesterday? Yes I did, honest. I don't know, someone mush have put it back there.

    1. Re:contractor by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I here the contractor now....someone mush have put it back there.

      I'm guessing that you: A) dictated this post, and B) have imbibed several alcoholic beverages.

  6. This is a ridiculous way to make concrete. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We already have a plethora of contractors, engineers and manufacturers intent on bypassing the critical stoichiometry required to produce defect free, indestructible concrete. Of course, this is all caused by cost. Which means, due to greed and stupidity, people will accept inferior products if it is cheaper. Even dirt. Most people will tell you that ALL concrete will eventually develop cracks. They are incompetant morons.
      Not sure if anyone is working on 3d printing concrete, I just assume someone is because it is a natural application. If you can't produce crack free concrete, there is something wrong with you.

    1. Re:This is a ridiculous way to make concrete. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I can't stop concrete sidewalks from being cracked by tree roots over the years, something is wrong with me? Obviously, I should just chop down all nearby trees.

      If I can't stop idiots with trucks that surpass expected weight limits or heavy objects falling onto the concrete, something is wrong with me? I'm not Superman.

      This has nothing to do with concrete when it being formed. The worst that happens at that time are paw prints and graffiti.

      My concern is, if this stuff works, how much will it work? Will it repair itself in the same area more than once? What is to stop the bacteria from forming a big lump on the surface after they bridge the crack's gap. Is the replacement material even nearly as strong as the original concrete or will it just break again under less stress? If the intended use of this for building construction or surfaces to walk on? I can see it being used in 1-3 story buildings as material, but any where solid concrete has to be used instead of those hollow cinder blocks, I can't see it being possible, much less if water is needed to activate it.

    2. Re:This is a ridiculous way to make concrete. by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Concrete longevity has a LOT to do with preparation and maintenance.

      For example tree roots - proper subsurface preparation, which isn't normally done for sidewalks, will result in roots not extending far under the concrete, and even if they do penetrate somewhat, not growing large enough to crack the concrete. Failing that, routine maintenance with certain products will kill the roots before they get too large, but leave the rest of the tree unaffected.

      As for your questions -
      1. It will probably only fix any given crack spot once.
      2. 99% of the fixes will be practically microscopic in nature.
      3. At the depths we're looking at, restoring a barrier is a bigger deal than being structural.
      4. Most of the time the very cracking releases the stress that caused the crack, then water gets in and freezes, widening it. This keeps the water out(after the bacteria do their job).

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:This is a ridiculous way to make concrete. by j-beda · · Score: 2

      My concern is, if this stuff works, how much will it work? Will it repair itself in the same area more than once? What is to stop the bacteria from forming a big lump on the surface after they bridge the crack's gap. Is the replacement material even nearly as strong as the original concrete or will it just break again under less stress? If the intended use of this for building construction or surfaces to walk on? I can see it being used in 1-3 story buildings as material, but any where solid concrete has to be used instead of those hollow cinder blocks, I can't see it being possible, much less if water is needed to activate it.

      Being able to repair small cracks to keep water out would go a long way to minimize the freeze/thaw damage that makes small cracks into big cracks. Even without the same strength as uncracked concrete, concrete with some small filled cracks will perform much better and last much longer than concrete with growing numbers of growing sized cracks.

    4. Re:This is a ridiculous way to make concrete. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      If you can't produce crack free concrete, there is something wrong with you.

      Concrete is often deliberately cracked to allow for thermal expansion and contraction. That's why we have lines on the sidewalks and joints in the roads. These bacteria would fill those in and cause heaving.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:This is a ridiculous way to make concrete. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Those "cracks" (technically they are expansion joints) are not made by mechanically cracking hardened concrete. They are made before pouring, by placing spacers that are poured in. Therefore the process should not crack the outer shell of the "healing agent" capsules. Thus the bacteria will not fix the expansion joints.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    6. Re:This is a ridiculous way to make concrete. by camperdave · · Score: 1

      No, they are made by running a tool called a grooving trowel across the surface of the sidewalk. This creates a half inch (or more) deep groove in the concrete, and because the concrete is thinner at the groove, that's where the slab cracks.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:This is a ridiculous way to make concrete. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      That is not how it's done here it the Netherlands.
      I imagine that tool will be outdated for rubber spacers with this type of concrete.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  7. Interesting implications for subterranean homes by grilled-cheese · · Score: 1

    One of the challenges faced by building subterranean homes is the threat of water damage over time as the home settles. Typical solutions include lining the outside of the shell, french drains, and/or reinforced plasticized concrete. Even when thinking more inside the box with traditional building, there are significant benefits to things like healing cracked slabs or preventing basement water damage.

  8. Foundation Repair (injection) by slackoon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems to me that this type of technology could be used on pre-existing concrete as well. Assuming it is strong enough, and it seems to be, it could be injected into foundation cracks. The crack would be fixed from the inside out. The savings in time and money would be enormous and it would be vastly superior to current methods of foundation repair.

    1. Re:Foundation Repair (injection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In either case, built-in or injected repair, the question is whether the repair is structurally sound, or just a patch to keep out water and contaminants. Even a patch would be beneficial and prevent further degradation.

    2. Re:Foundation Repair (injection) by dmatos · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? They fix cracks in concrete now by injecting hydraulic cement. Exactly the same delivery process, except the crack is then sealed as soon as the cement dries, and it uses an existing, inexpensive substance.

      I don't think anyone is complaining that injected hydraulic cement is not strong enough, or doesn't fill all of the gaps.

      --

      It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
      --Scott Adams
    3. Re:Foundation Repair (injection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the current methods include injecting epoxy, so the "savings in time and money" would be?

    4. Re:Foundation Repair (injection) by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? They fix cracks in concrete now by injecting hydraulic cement. Exactly the same delivery process, except the crack is then sealed as soon as the cement dries, and it uses an existing, inexpensive substance.

      I don't think anyone is complaining that injected hydraulic cement is not strong enough, or doesn't fill all of the gaps.

      But can reopen.

      Think plaster walls and ceilings. You can repair cracks, but just get new ones.

  9. Concrete by fredrated · · Score: 3, Funny

    heal thyself!

  10. Theoretical? by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this a theoretical development or does it have concrete uses?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Theoretical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theoretically, it does have a concrete use.

    2. Re:Theoretical? by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

      Is this a theoretical development or does it have concrete uses?

      These are scientists. It's all theoretical until the civil engineers get their hands on the stuff.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    3. Re:Theoretical? by njnnja · · Score: 2

      In theory, there are no concrete applications for this, but concretely, there are.

    4. Re:Theoretical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a really hard question to answer.

  11. I hope it's a fast process... by Krokus · · Score: 1

    It will have to repair fast enough to beat the dirt and weeds from staking a claim to those cracks.

  12. Biocrete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a trade representative from Janus VI, my Horta constituents are very interested!

  13. What about Geopolymer Concrete? by F34nor · · Score: 1

    Why not just make self healing limestone instead?

  14. Antifragility? by Dainutehvs · · Score: 1

    Vivat Antifragility !

  15. Grey Scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone watch "game of thrones"? this is exactly how things like grey scale start...next thing we know...people will be turning to concrete, and dragons will be flying around.

  16. Not mentioned in the article.... by jm007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How does it keep from activating when the concrete is initially wet from mixing?

  17. Straw vegans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Vegans aren't unwilling to do anything that could feasibly kill animals, they're unwilling to eat animal products. Gut bacteria are not animals and probably don't suffer (or even think for that matter). I'm not a vegan myself, but I'd imagine they're trying to minimize their contribution to suffering and don't pretend to eliminate it entirely.

    You strike me as someone who says "atheists don't believe in anything" and "vaccine supporters think the government owns you".

    1. Re:Straw vegans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Actually, yes, most 'gut bacteria' are indeed animals. Any that aren't would be plants.

      ...no. GIYF.

    2. Re:Straw vegans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bacteria are no more animals than a rock or baseball bat. They're Prokaryotes, which is an entire different kingdom than Eukaryotes which include plants and animals.

    3. Re:Straw vegans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You need to read some biology text that's younger than 30 or 40 years old.

      Life hasn't been divided into just plants and animals in a long time. There's also fungi, bacteria, archaea, ... See here for example.

    4. Re:Straw vegans by spiritplumber · · Score: 2

      Vegans take more animal lives than non-vegans. Think about insects, small mammals etc. swept up in the harvest.

      --
      Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    5. Re:Straw vegans by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing that cows don't eat.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    6. Re:Straw vegans by Patabugen · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing that cows don't eat.

      mod points,please!

    7. Re:Straw vegans by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Far opposite from the truth. I'm no vegan myself -- but growing meat animals requires vastly more inputs (grain, water, etc) than would be needed if skipping the (delicious) intermediate step. Humans consume less grains in sum when consuming them directly, rather than via an intermediate layer.

  18. Limestone and caves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't limestone relatively easy washed out by water? (Which is major cave building mechanism)

    1. Re:Limestone and caves by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Isn't limestone relatively easy washed out by water? (Which is major cave building mechanism)

      Good question. But that process in caves is not so easy and happens very slowly. If our buildings last ten thousand years, that is probably enough... 8-)

  19. Growing at the surface by morgauxo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What keeps the surface of the concrete from "growing"?

    1. Re:Growing at the surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The lack of exposed broken bacteria capsules and food.

  20. So this is how the T-1000 started out by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Cementinator

    1. Re:So this is how the T-1000 started out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be then C-1000.

  21. Reservations by pesho · · Score: 1

    Some of you may have reservations about the use of live concrete. Don't worry, just give it some time. It will grow on you.

  22. Crack Filling = Hiding Critical Flaws? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the concrete fills it's own cracks automagically, two questions spring to mind: 1) Will the crack-filling material have the same load bearing properties or (as I suspect) it will be much weaker at those spots, and 2) will the filled cracks disguise the facts that the object may be under a load that was not anticipated by the designer (tensile or bending loads vs. compressive loads)?

    Reinforced concrete is often used in bending and tensile load applications in architecture, and if the reinforcing is not stiff enough cracks often will appear on the surface. They are unsightly, but if the reinforcing is taking the load (as it should) these are not structural deficiencies. But for complex architectural domes and shells, the presence and size of these cracks is something that needs to be monitored.

    If the concrete is used in a container and it cracks, we may actually want to see the crack as that is a warning that something is being loaded in an unanticipated way. Hiding it with a self-filling mechanism may not be desirable.

    --

    Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

    Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    1. Re:Crack Filling = Hiding Critical Flaws? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 1

      And to head off the OCD pedants, I accidentally said "it's" when it should have been "its". Get over it.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    2. Re:Crack Filling = Hiding Critical Flaws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add a dye to the food capsules.

    3. Re:Crack Filling = Hiding Critical Flaws? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      TFA has pictures. The cracks are very visible, they have a different color.
      Open cracks are almost always structural weak points as water, dirt and plants get in them, further cracking the concrete and rusting the reinforcement (which, incidentally, cracks the concrete). If cracks form to make the reinforcing take a normal load then there should have been (more) pre-tension on the reinforcing. It is a clear cut case of bad building practice.
      If the and all similar bad building practices have been removed then there are still loads the concrete was not designed for. For example an unusually strong storm or mechanical damage (a truck crashing into the bridge). These events are not frequent and can only to some extent be accounted for. The cracks formed by these could be healed by this self healing concrete.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  23. Dear Peter F. Hamilton, by thedarb · · Score: 1

    You can now stop calling futuristic concrete 'enzyme bonded concrete'.

    Thank you,
    Reader

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  24. Mortar Forker by rot26 · · Score: 1

    In a previous life I worked designing concrete mixes for a decade or so. I see problems when the bacteria start producing lime unexpectedly. Cracks? We got 'em.

    --



    To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    1. Re:Mortar Forker by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      What do you think of waterproofing admixtures like Krystol Internal Membrane that are claimed to exhibit similar behavior only using the mechanism of crystalline growth rather than bacterial growth?

    2. Re:Mortar Forker by rot26 · · Score: 1

      I don't know. And I don't KNOW anything about the bacterial process either. But I would worry about unexpected activation in either product. If I was still in the industry I would care, but at the moment I don't. (although I assume that a LOT of people DO care very much.)

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
  25. heared that before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it sounds like an upgrade avaliable in starcraft...

  26. one thing to note by ltorvalds024 · · Score: 1

    This self-healing concrete only heals its crack, but when small of concrete breaks apart from the parent it wont be able to make itself to original shape

    1. Re:one thing to note by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Usually parts break off from concrete when there was a small crack to begin, then either one of the next cases happens:
      1. water enters the hole-> freezes (expands) -> crack gets bigger -> more water enters -> freezes-> crack gets bigger -> etc -> part breaks off.
      2. Dirt and water enters the crack -> plant grows in crack -> roots crack the concrete further -> part breaks off.

      This self healing concrete prevents both scenarios as it heals the initial small crack, preventing water and dirt from entering. It stops the crack in it's early stages.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  27. BSG Galactica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, nobody remembers BSG Galactica Cylon based bio crack fixer?
    I doubt this place is for geeks anymore.

  28. Concrete already does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends upon formulation but calcium migrates in concrete and can fill thin cracks due to chemical action. No bacteria required. Some formulations do this more than others. Look for old concrete back when energy use was less of a concern and you can see the self healing cracks. it doesn't work where the concrete is in motion and I suspect this bio process will not either. Journalism is less than perfect so I suspect the researchers are trying to provide the self healing properties of concrete to the fly ash and other amendment based concrete formulations