I have to agree with this statement. I've been with Charter since they started offering Internet service, first at 1.5 then 3 and now 5Mbps. Each and every time I got the service that I expected.
What GPL licensed software are you using in your application? Depending on what GPL stuff you are using you might have to release your software under the GPL also.
A long time ago I used a piece of free software called NQS to do someting along these lines. I found the following reference (this is were I originally downloaded the software):
In the article in CNET there is the following quote:
"Without our OFDM patents, there would be no
802.11a/g," he said. "We didn't enforce these
patents sooner, because we didn't want to slow
down development in the market. But now that
the technologies are firmly established, we
feel we must protect our intellectual
property."
Since they did not start enforcing their patents when they first discovered the "infringement" they should not be allowed to enforce them now.
Talk to the guys at PerformanceIT.com. I haven't kept track of their recent developments but it seems to me they could satisfy most if not all of your requirements.
Note: I'm not fully unbiased. I have a friend that works there.
One would have to be careful in calculating the damages. I wonder if any of the CIOs in the 16% of affected implementations plans have actually stepped up their implementation schedule because they were replacing SCO and wanted to speedup getting it totally out of house or were just upset about the actions of SCO and wanted to rub it in their faces.
I would be quite interested in how you limited net access by user name if it was the user name of the logged in user that was being used. I am currently trying to do this, restrict net access based on user instead of physical hardware, on my home network (Win98 and Win2000 clients, Linux firewall) but have not been successful.
I just moved into a home that just had built. I wired each room with several jacks. Each jack has Cat5 for phone, dual Cat6, and dual RG6QS home run to a wiring panel. I think this will set me up for several years to come. I looked into fiber (and could get about one-half of what I needed free) but the other half that I would need to get was two expensive for something that I might never use. But I also figure that can always to go the upper rooms through the attic and the lower rooms through the basement. This way I can add it later if it is needed.
Slashdot Mirror
I have to agree with this statement. I've been with Charter since they started offering Internet service, first at 1.5 then 3 and now 5Mbps. Each and every time I got the service that I expected.
Get a Kill A WATT. The are only about $25 US. I got one a couple of weeks ago. Great little toy.
4 400/P4400-CE.html/
http://www.p3international.com/products/special/P
Give this a shot:
s p?T1=134+1370&dept=lch8&search=1ds40&child=
s p?T1=134+1360&dept=&search=&child=
http://www.cyberguys.com/templates/searchdetail.a
or the less expensive:
http://www.cyberguys.com/templates/searchdetail.a
What GPL licensed software are you using in your application? Depending on what GPL stuff you are using you might have to release your software under the GPL also.
A long time ago I used a piece of free software called NQS to do someting along these lines. I found the following reference (this is were I originally downloaded the software):
m in /nqs-2.5/
http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/hppd/hpux/Networking/Ad
In the article in CNET there is the following quote:
"Without our OFDM patents, there would be no
802.11a/g," he said. "We didn't enforce these
patents sooner, because we didn't want to slow
down development in the market. But now that
the technologies are firmly established, we
feel we must protect our intellectual
property."
Since they did not start enforcing their patents when they first discovered the "infringement" they should not be allowed to enforce them now.
Talk to the guys at PerformanceIT.com. I haven't kept track of their recent developments but it seems to me they could satisfy most if not all of your requirements.
Note: I'm not fully unbiased. I have a friend that works there.
One would have to be careful in calculating the damages. I wonder if any of the CIOs in the 16% of affected implementations plans have actually stepped up their implementation schedule because they were replacing SCO and wanted to speedup getting it totally out of house or were just upset about the actions of SCO and wanted to rub it in their faces.
That is why it is going to be around $280.00 :)
I would be quite interested in how you limited net access by user name if it was the user name of the logged in user that was being used. I am currently trying to do this, restrict net access based on user instead of physical hardware, on my home network (Win98 and Win2000 clients, Linux firewall) but have not been successful.
I just moved into a home that just had built. I wired each room with several jacks. Each jack has Cat5 for phone, dual Cat6, and dual RG6QS home run to a wiring panel. I think this will set me up for several years to come. I looked into fiber (and could get about one-half of what I needed free) but the other half that I would need to get was two expensive for something that I might never use. But I also figure that can always to go the upper rooms through the attic and the lower rooms through the basement. This way I can add it later if it is needed.