Slashdot Mirror


Wiring A New House?

jbp123 asks: "I'm building a new house. Once the electrician has run the phone lines I want to run cat5e ethernet cable. I figure two drops to each of the 6 rooms with phone lines. I've never done this but my plan is to run the ethenet cable through the same path that the phone lines follow. I'll use up the rest of the 1000 foot spool by running a third cable to a few of the rooms. Ethernet cable is cheap. I found solid cat5e 1000 foot spools for $60 delivered so the decision to run cat5e cable is a no brainer. The question is should I run fiber? I really don't know how much the cable costs since I don't know what cable to use. It is much easier to run cable before the drywall goes in so I want to make an informed decision now. Ten years from now will I need/want fiber?"

730 comments

  1. Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put in fiber.
    You'll only regret it later.

    1. Re:Yes. by antadam · · Score: 3, Informative

      not really...if you're happy w/cat 5e run that...if everything is through the walls and you ever want to change the type of wire, just pull out the cat 5e and hook the new fiber to the one end of the cat 5e when you pull it out. everything is already strung then.

    2. Re:Yes. by lupetto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wires are so 20th century. If you're going to shell out the money, look into getting a good wireless network.

    3. Re:Yes. by somethinghollow · · Score: 0, Redundant

      He speaks the truth. New wireless standards are super fast, and easily replaceable later on, and minus one pesky wire from the lot.

    4. Re:Yes. by antadam · · Score: 1

      definitely true...but its really up to whoever owns the network...i personally get a kick out of putting in wires and electricuting myself. its just like cars, manual will never die b/c people like messing w/that sort of deal....but i do agree on the wireless part

    5. Re:Yes. by vax · · Score: 1, Informative

      a few years ago everyone would have said usb this and usb that, but usb has a very short range (as in how many feet it can go before being renewed i guess) cat5 is great for networks, ive got 3 seperate cat5 lines going into my room alone.., they also could be used for other devices as well (its really just a matter of mapping out the ports with the wires and there are plenty of wires in cat5 (8 i belive) also firewire might be another option although expensive and like usb iam not sure of the range but i do know its fast as hell. Wireless is a good choice especially with the broadcast points becoming cheap. I used to use packet radio on the amature networks but that was in the early 90s and obviously wireless is easier to setup and faster to use. just remember with cat 5 always run extra lines so if you think you will need 1 better make it 2 just in case.. hubs also come into play but i think seperate lines going through the wall to a 100/10 router is better than having to goto 10megabit hubs. just a few more angles
      VAX

    6. Re:Yes. by creepy_chris · · Score: 0

      Why the heck would you run firewire and USB through the walls? Firewire and USB both run way slower than Fast Ethernet. And what are you going to connect to that firewire that you wouldn't want to connect right at the computer? Hook your video camera in the living room up to your computer in the den? What would be the point. I agree with the poster who said to run Cat5 now, and if you ever decide to change to fiber or something else, use your existing cat 5 as a pull string. Or even better, when you run the CAT5 run it with a pull string. They make this cheap nylon rope that comercial data/telecom cable guys piggy back with all of their cable runs, we used to call it Jetline but I think that was just one manufacturer's brand. Just make sure you don't tie down your wire to anthing inside the wall so that you can pull it straight through when the time comes.

    7. Re:Yes. by vax · · Score: 1

      well besides being a narrow minded skeptic perhaps he didnt want to have a mere inter-housed network. Before insulting my intellegence, did he not ask for OPTIONS, that doesnt mean 1000 comments all saying cat5 and nothing else. how do you know what he wants? unless your the guy who posted the article quit flaming. how do you know he doesnt live in a busy city and wants a network of cameras or something outside, also firewire is fast and different than ethernet. I was simply offering the avilible options and a firewire or even usb part of the network would be a much easier way to get multiple cameras and other non computer items going. (two words, Home Automation) heh x10 and all that stuff, i know that appeals to me and if i had the cash to drop on cool shit like remotes for every (and anything) i would get them myself.. whats stopping him from wireing his automation into the network for live stats and control over a secure medium from afar? lets keep the options open before jumping to conclusions. For in wall wiring i recommend cat5 since its not only fast but cost effective as well.

      VAX

    8. Re:Yes. by sdh60 · · Score: 1

      I've thought about wireless but the security issue is a bit troublesome... it's easy enough to sniff packets on a wired network let alone a wireless network

      --
      I have measured out my life with coffee spoons; T.S. Elliot - The L
    9. Re:Yes. by faubfam · · Score: 1

      Wireless, specifically 802.11a is not that fast and doesn't work well through walls. I find myself aching for GigE because it takes several minutes to move 6 GB of DVD files between machines on 100baseT. Imagine trying to do that on an 802.11 wireless which is lucky to achieve 5 Mbps of actual throughput on an 11 Mbps modulation. It would take almost 3 hours.

      Wires are very efficient and cheap. String the cat5e even if just to hook up an 802.11a base-station in each and every room so that you can approach 20 Mbps throughput in both ends of your house.

      Chris

  2. Fiber by beretboy · · Score: 1

    In the long run you will be better off

    1. Re:Fiber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Install PVC conduit for your cat5 runs, with full sweeps and no hard-90 corners. Be sure to leave a pull cord in each run. Then if you decide you'd rather have fiber in a few years, just pull it in - with conduit you're covered either way.

    2. Re:Fiber by GB+Kalis · · Score: 1

      While condiut is a good idea, don't use PVC, it's cheap, but dangerous. When PVC burns, it releases dangerous gasses. When inhaled, they turn into hydrochloric acid in your lungs (the C in PVC is chloride). While current fire codes do not prevent using PVC in walls in the US, they do in most of the rest of the developed world. PVC is completely illegal in Europe. My opinion is that it is great underground for your sprinkler system, but should never be in your walls if you can help it.

    3. Re:Fiber by Oing! · · Score: 1

      Run fiber or at least Cat6 copper. It costs more, and the Cat6 will work with much cheaper hardware, but if you really want to plan ahead, go with fiber and expect to pay some serious dollars for the networking gear that works with it.

      Realistically, one of the things you need to look at is bottlenecks. If you want a very fast in-house network, fine. But if you expect to be using the kind of bandwidth that requires fiber to connect to the 'Net, you'll have to wait until the telcos start running fiber to people's homes as a matter of routine unless you want to spend a lot of $$$. I expect fiber to the house to be
      fairly common within 5 to 10 years, but right now it tends to cost a fortune. Make sure to use tubing for any data cabling, copper or fiber, because it makes it much easier to pull out old cable and install newer stuff in a few years.

      Best regards,
      Oing!

  3. On the other hand... by The+Great+Wakka · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You might try running the cables on the outside of the walls. Easy to upgrade, easy to run. Buy some clamps, and paste the cable, then paint it. Just an idea.

    --
    Everything is mainstream now.
    1. Re:On the other hand... by ChazeFroy · · Score: 2

      A more expensive alternative is to put PVC piping in the walls and run the cables through it. It wouldn't be as ugly as having the cables on the outside, and you can easily upgrade. I am considering to do this when I build my house in the next 1-2 years.

      Of course the major drawback is the expense of the PVC piping.

    2. Re:On the other hand... by FFFish · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or find a wrecking site for some old store or school, and see if you can nip the old conduit. Cheap as anything. Probably EM proof, too!

      Don't forget to also wire for sound and cable. You should have shielded speaker/audio/video cable running all over the place, and the old cable company television cable, too.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:On the other hand... by FFFish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, and now's the time to get the electrician to drop a loop down to a box every fourth stud or so. You *can* *not* have too many electrical boxes ready to be used.

      Make sure you have an accurate map of their placement. Then let the sheetrock guys cover 'em up: most of the boxes will go unused. But the day you desperately need an outlet *right there,* you'll be eversothankful you had the foresight to have a hidden box ready to go...

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    4. Re:On the other hand... by FFFish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Arrrgh. Another thing!

      Run some beefy nylon string through the studs. This will give you the opportunity to pull cable in the future. Use separate holes, and smooth off the edges so that the chances of snagging are reduced.

      (This, if you don't do the conduiting.)

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    5. Re:On the other hand... by mmaddox · · Score: 4, Redundant

      Ignore these ranting loonies...

      Wire what you WANT, and then add an extra run to your office, your wife's office, and behind your televisions. Don't forget the kitchen.

      My new house was completed last April, and I've got 5e drops (2 or more per room) with a 100M switch in the "wiring closet" - an extra room in our attic. We considered fiber, too, but realized that fiber connections are just the flakiest things in the world. They're expensive, unreliable, and a downright pain, plus, it seems unlikely that we're going to be seeing anything faster than Gig-E anytime soon, so we're all set.

      If, by some weird occurrence, fiber becomes standard sometime in the future, I can pull the rooms by cutting and tying off my 5e from the attic. I will have removed the 5e and added the fiber at the same time. No sweat.

      More important than the cabling, make certain to get your primary computer room plugs on a different circuit from the rest of the room's circuit. THAT will come in handy. I have my office computer outlets and my wiring closet outlets on their own, separate circuits, and I don't feel too uncomfortable running what I want, now. Make sure you get extra outlets, too!

      --

      What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

    6. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      back on that first hand, you might not want your house to look like shit.

      I know that home depot has a bundle of cat5 coax and fiber, and it runs about 8 cents a foot.

      If you are planning on running your fiber later after a truly informed decision can be made, you don't need PVC in the walls, (besides you are still talking about 90 degree angles with PVC) try looking at flexible (unisulared) 2" or 3" duct. It will be a lot cheaper.

      Run the duct, or PVC if you so prefer from the place where you think that you might want your jack, up into the attic (be sure to run it high enough thaqt you can see it after the insulation gets put in).

      It may be a tad late, but that would not be a bad way to run your cat5, if you ever wanted to change it out or had a problem with a line, you have it all ther in your data run.

      And yes, it really is that hard to run cable after you sheet rock the place

    7. Re:On the other hand... by malfunct · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I would say in addition to this, put some conduit in for the network runs. I cant imagine trying to pull fiber through a run if it wasn't in conduit (I know how hard you have to yank that romex to get it to snake through all those terrible rough holes in studs, I spent far to much of my younger life remodeling with my dad).

      I think fiber at this point would be a poor idea because by the time you need it the standard will have changed. I know thats a problem in our current communications industry (the many miles of forever dark fiber).

      I do recommend running sound cables and cable tv cables all over, also maybe other sort of video cables.

      Also instead of duplicating runs, look into the possibility of switching wall plates. I saw them on some review site not long ago and they look like a great way to fake 4 connections into 1 wire run, though you are limited to always having those puppies on the same segment I guess.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    8. Re:On the other hand... by dhogaza · · Score: 2

      In my area, at least, burying boxes this way is a no-no and would surely draw the wrath of the electrical inspector. Your electrician will know if this is true in your area.

      Making a map would seem to answer the obvious objection to burying boxes, but what guarantee is there that the next owner will get the map? Or that you'll not lose it? Or get hit by a truck without bothering to tell anyone where it is or what it is?

      The idea is that another electrician should be able to come in and figure out the wiring including all splices without ripping out all your walls.

    9. Re:On the other hand... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, what rights do building inspectors have to tell you what you can and cannot do. It's my house, if I want it to burn down then so be it! It's my fucking money, so get the hell out :-D

      --
      My other car is first.
    10. Re:On the other hand... by CMiYC · · Score: 2

      I think he mean just the boxes themselves. No wires. I would think you could pass an electrical inspection with having just the boxes there. I can understand not passing if they all had wires running through them. I could be wrong though.

    11. Re:On the other hand... by CMiYC · · Score: 2

      They have every right in the world. Its your house now, but it might not be 20 years from now. And if your house burns down 20 years from now while someone else's kids are sleeping, that is not good. Its all in the name of safety. Well, at least it use to be in the name of safety. Now it might also be in the name of "our city needs more money, and you need a permit for that nail to hang a picture."

      But regardless, I wouldn't want to move into a house without some (even small) level of reassurance someone has said "yeah, as far as we know, this wiring is safe (even if barely)."

    12. Re:On the other hand... by thetechweenie · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that's not why alot of fiber is unlit... Alot if it is not lit because they don't need more bandwidth. Until the last mile issues are resolved it's just not needed. Also, alot of the CLEC's (like me old one) went out of business. So, we had paid to have fiber run all over the place by NEON (NorthEast Optical Network) and now they no longer use it...

      --


      Um, this is my sig.
    13. Re:On the other hand... by CMiYC · · Score: 2

      Something along these lines are probably the best idea. That way if in 10 years its not fiber, but a cable full of bubbles, you aren't screwed. If you do use PVC (or some kind of conduit), just make sure you put some rope in them so that you can pull the cables through later. Otherwise you aren't saving yourself much trouble. (Some, but not much).

    14. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run the CAT5e instead of your phone wires as well.

      Fiber is expensive to terminate. Unless you know you need fiber somewhere I would not run it.

      If you want to spend money and make everything upgradeable to whatever, Run 2" conduit to every location (from a central basement area, maybe with pull boxes that combine multiple 2" runs into 6" runs), and run your data/voice/video cables through that. If you need to upgrade - you only need to pull additional cables.

    15. Re:On the other hand... by FFFish · · Score: 2

      A simple loop shouldn't be against code. Wire runs down into the box, and right back out. It doesn't get cut at all. If having the wire fold back on itself is a no-no, then have it run through one knockout and out another.

      Who needs a guarantee that I don't lose the map?! Not having the map isn't any worse than not having the boxes in the first place.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    16. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with most of what he said except not running duplicate runs. Definately to duplicate runs every where. Like you said Cat5 is cheap so make the runs now before the drywall is up. The 3com switch plate is a nice idea though. Also make sure your runs aren't greater than thespec for gigabit ethernet. Having your hubs central located would also be helpful.

    17. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This got an insightful mod? You people are worse morons than Cringley.

    18. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I have done, and although was not cheap, it will be secure, efficient and reliable. When I did it 18mo ago wireless technology was none of these.( I tried Diamond HomeFree- v. unreliable).

    19. Re:On the other hand... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2

      On that note, you may also want to have a circuit on each of those drops routed as UPS. Then just put as many UPS's as you want in the garage/basement, and not worry about losing power on things like computer servers, alarm clocks, vcr, etc. Beats putting 9V batteries in everything.

    20. Re:On the other hand... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Switching wall plates are an interesting idea but those four ports cannot get full speed at the same time. For most homes, no one would notice. And, a four port 100M switch will generate a measurable amount of heat -- esp. in a non-vented electrical box.

      And before people start being stupid and suggesting using all the pairs in the cable, please take a moment to find and read the signal specifications for 100base-TX and the cat5 cable being used. The cable was not designed, tested, or certified to carry more than one ethernet connection (certainly not more than one 100B-TX connection.) You can generally get away with two 10M ethernets over one cat5 run. But two 100M etherenets will give you problems -- the longer the run and the more traffic you push over them, the more evident the problems will be.

    21. Re:On the other hand... by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 0

      And if you knock out the plug? (I've done this many times with my alarm clock, and it has made me oversleep more than once, not to mention the hassle of resetting the clock constantly.)

      --


      Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
    22. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just run conduit. It is an added expense but will pay off in the long run since your house will outlive any current standard (hopefully). Then you can run anything you'd like and swap it out easily when the time comes without punching any holes through your drywall. This is typically only done in commercial buildings but I doubt the cost would be prohibitively high.

    23. Re:On the other hand... by von+Moltke · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am not an electrician, but I've done my own electrical work, so here's my opinion:

      The way I understand it, according to the National Electric Code, any box with wires running into it (even if it is just a pass-through) needs to be accessable. The thing to do in this case would be to cut the holes in the plasterboard and cover the box with a blank plate.

      The bonus with this method is that the placement of the boxes is obvious and the plasterboard doesn't need to be cut later. Therefore a map is unnecessary. Also, if the walls are concrete block and plaster, not plasterboard, this is the only practical way to go (unless you want to start cutting holes in the block for new boxes).

    24. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just leave a loop in the romex, it must be straped according to code. The problem with burying boxes is that they must be installed flush with the sheetrock, if they are flush with the stud and there is a spark it could ignite a smouldering fire inside the wall. This would not be a problem if there were no splices inside the boxes, but if an outlet were ever installed in those boxes, that would be a fire hazard.

    25. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Instead of a map, videotape or photograph each wall before the drywall goes up. Sure helps when you try to figure out where the pipes or wires are.

    26. Re:On the other hand... by spamkabuki · · Score: 1

      Definitely run what you like now, but run plenty of conduit with pull strings for later. PVC is probably fine, but metal conduit can be had cheap/free too from salvage. The EMI shielding is a nice plus. Just make sure you that you keep an eye out for any grounding issues. And if you think you have enough conduit, run more just in case. It'll make your life easier to avoid congested conduit in the future. It can never hurt to leave yourself some leeway.

    27. Re:On the other hand... by crucini · · Score: 2

      There is no particular reason to install pull string when the conduit is installed, other than proving the continuity of the conduit. Professional electricians blow the string through with a compressor, or use a fish tape if it's a short run. No competent electrician installs pull string 10 feet at a time as he installs conduit, because any code-compliant conduit installation is fairly easy to string. The main issues in code compliance being: All pull boxes, condolets and junction boxes are accessible, and no more than 360 degrees of bend between access points.

    28. Re:On the other hand... by Erasei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You should check with your local city building code before doing this. While most places won't have a problem with it, in the village where I live (Chicago area, ~30,000population) any in-wall piping is required to be metal conduit. This is done for fire safety reasons regardless if it is electrical wiring inside or not. Just something to consider.

      --
      visit my free wallpaper collection, wp.erasei.com
    29. Re:On the other hand... by malfunct · · Score: 1
      I've heard that there are technology issues with it as well. I agree that all your above points are correct, but I think that until household fiber connecting is very standard (and I haven't seen that it is) it would be best to avoid running it currently but to prepare for it in the future by laying the correct conduit.

      Also it would be good (as other people have indicated) to put a nice piece of line in that unused conduit in order to pull new runs, and remember when you pull the new runs with it to include another line in those runs for pulling more wire in case you want to add in the future.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    30. Re:On the other hand... by Neoplasm · · Score: 1

      I've been an electrician for almost 20 years and although my reading of the NEC is that you can't have any hidden *splices*, the only interpretation that counts is the inspector's. He probably won't let you do it, but even if he did, what's the point. Are you trying to save a couple of bucks in material? Fees on inspections are charged by the box, so you won't save any money on the permit. Most wall space is covered up by furniture so the extra outlets won't be seen anyway. If they are on an open wall, boxes aren't nailed to the stud flush, they are nailed out 3/8" so that the edge of the box will be close to flush with the outside of the sheetrock. This means extra lumps on an open wall.

      --
      Do this don't do that Can't you redesign.
    31. Re:On the other hand... by Neoplasm · · Score: 1

      Ah yes,...the Mrs. O'Leary's cow rule!

      --
      Do this don't do that Can't you redesign.
    32. Re:On the other hand... by strathconaman · · Score: 1

      They make base boards with space for cabling on the inside. Very efficient.

    33. Re:On the other hand... by pls · · Score: 1

      Is it plausible to use the other two pair for telephone?

    34. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have all the right. Its against the law in the US to burn you own house down. Its called arson and insurence fraud, even if you dont put in a claim. Im amazed at the stupidity of people

    35. Re:On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't bury the boxes, just put a blank faceplate on them (one with no holes). This should satisfy the code inspector, and also prevents messing up the walls--not to mention ruining the wires--when you try to cut an opening into the hidden box.

      Besides this, the hidden box wouldn't work very well when you do go to use it. It will be too far from the front side of the wallboard for the cover screws to reach. Code requires the box edge to be flush with the finished surface (within a small tolerance). The boxes and hardware are made accordingly.

      Any installer who would try the hidden box trick is one I would avoid!

      Disclaimer: ianan electrician, nor a building inspector, nor a licensed PE. Have your plans reviewed by a qualified professional who can give you a legally valid interpretation of your situation according to local regulations.

  4. Fiber? What other cables. by jarodss · · Score: 4, Redundant

    Not like this hasn't popped up on slash a few times before, but why only phone, cat5 and fiber?

    What about running Svideo and RCA to everyroom or an extra drop of cat5 to run sound on?

    And as far as running the cat5 parallel to the phone, if your building the house why not set your cables into conduits, that way you can upgrade to whatever cabling you need in ten years.

    1. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by ender- · · Score: 1

      nd as far as running the cat5 parallel to the phone, if your building the house why not set your cables into conduits, that way you can upgrade to whatever cabling you need in ten years.

      Leaving a fairly easy upgrade path is almost always good advice.

      Plus, hopefully in a few years everything will be wireless, and the cabling will be superfluous.

      Ender

    2. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by demaria · · Score: 2, Redundant

      I'd be surprised if the Svideo or RCA cable can handle any decent level of quality on a long run. RJ6 (coax) would be a better choice there, it's easy to tap and can go long distances.

      There is technology coming down the pike (some available today) that will allow digital video to run over Cat5E cable.

    3. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by Colin · · Score: 4, Redundant
      What about running Svideo and RCA to everyroom or an extra drop of cat5 to run sound on?

      There are various (cheapish - under $100) ways of running video over Cat5. Personally, I've got Cat5 and audio cables into rooms, and run everything over that.

      However, 2 per room is not enough. There are a number of reasons for this:

      • They're never where you want them. You'll always want to move stuff around, and cables draped across the floor doesn't look good.
      • Once you've got the cables in, you'll see more uses. For example, telephone, TV, Audio for hifi, remote control for hifi, remote control for lighting, PC network - all possibly in one room.
      • When building, it's cheap. It's much easier to put these cables in before the drywall goes up. Trying to fish them through afterwards is hard work. BTDT

      Don't bother with fibre. It's not going to get used. People have been saying "fibre is the next big thing" for 5 years now - and cable just keeps catching up. Video over Cat5 is cheap - so, instead of piping cable round the house, put all the set top boxes in one location, and remote control them. 100Mb Ethernet is very cheap - VHS video quality needs about 3 Mb/sec, so you can stream that across existing networks. Hi definition uncompressed video is more than 100Mb/sec - but 1Gb/sec over copper is on the horizon.

    4. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by jimmit_t · · Score: 1

      I'm not too familiar with the applications of fiber, but shouldn't fiber have enough bandwidth to handle everything?

    5. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by demaria · · Score: 2

      Same thing with power outlets. There used to never be enough power outlets in rooms. Then that changed over the past few decades. :)

      Remote control for lighting should be done with X-10 enabled equipment. It's a simple, low speed network, but it doesn't need to be fast. Most X-10 devices just need to turn on or off. Plus it runs over the existing power lines, so that will save a lot of money not having to run all those cables to turn on each light.

      HDTV at its max resolution, uncompressed, requires 1.2Gbps. Heehee. Bandwidth! :)

    6. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by DynamicBits · · Score: 1, Redundant
      Cheap S-Video cables will deliver degraded signal over long distances. But, if you're willing to spend the extra cash, you can get very high quality cables that support long distances without any problems.

    7. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by isorox · · Score: 4, Redundant

      We have 20m runs of svideo at the uni tv station no problem. If you're more interested in length though we've done 100+m runs of high quality microphone cable (for video, £1.40 a metre), and 5-m+ runs of cheap (15p/metre) common tv cable with a couple of bnc or composite ends stuck on.

      We have a 300m rj6 crap quality cable with 2 20db boosters and a high output on the VTR at the start and another booster at the end (before a proper industry booster and splitter with another 200m run from there).

      If you need more then a 50m (150 foot) single run in your new house I'm envious.

      However its all very well dropping in whatever cables you need, think about how you are going to use them - do you really want them all arriving in your basement? Drop a lot more cable down to your living room, just in case.

      Might be worthwhile sticking some cheap speaker wire or 2 core mains flex down there too - if you need a signal.

      And finaly, whatever you come up with, double it. A video signal to each room is fine, until you want a tv in there, and a camera.

    8. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by cyberspectre · · Score: 1

      The future use of fiber is still very much of an unknown. It can be run later if desired.

      I ran 7 drops through-out my house (finished house - 3 years old). Each drop consists of two Cat-5 cables, each terminated in RJ-45(?) sockets, and two RG-6 coaxial cables. All of these are run to a wiring closet where the cat-5 connect to a punch down block, and some of the coaxial cables are connected to a simple splitter.

      With the propper devices, the cat-5 can be used to transmit video (composit or S-video) and audio (stereo) back to the closet. Eventually, I'd like to place those video feeds on their own cable channels for distribution within the house. This requires agile modulators (select a channel 70 - 99), and a combiner/distribution amp/splitter. None of this is particularly cheap; modulators ($75-100), combiner (splitter used backwards ($10), cable capabile amplifier $100-300). Check out http://www.onqtech.com/ and http://www.channelplus.com/ for the video equipment

      That leaves the other cat-5 for 2 telephone lines and 1 computer network connect back to a future hub in the closet.

      Hmmm. Maybe I should have run three cat-5's?

      Check out http://www.onqtech.com/ and http://www.channelplus.com/ for the video equipment.

      How to wire hone lines/punchdown blocks, see http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/4116/ index.html

    9. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by elandal · · Score: 1

      SVideo and RCA that are good for long hauls are pretty expensive. Cat5 is cheap. Fiber isn't very expensive, but equipment for fiber is.

      However, I agree that running at least three times the drops that I believe I'd ever want is the way to go. That way when (soon) I notice I want more than I had believed, it's there. Note that twice the cable is not enough, three times has been enough every time.

      As I'm just moving to a new apartment that was built with Gigaspeed(R) cabling (for phones, too..) I noticed that it's still built for the average family: 1+1 jacks in every room (2+2 in living room), with one in every plate connected together in the matrix ("pre-connected for phone") and the other not connected, two uplinks (one for phone, one for 'net), one patch cord to wire the 'net uplink to one room..
      Have to see how much these Gigaspeed(R) whatever connectors cost (no, it's not RJ45 in the matrix), go buy some, and some patch cables, run a few extra wires, and see if it'll work out.

      (picked up the papers.. It's Systimax(R) SCS GigaSPEED(R) cabling, with 110-wiring matrix, and the apartment cabling box has "space for active devices" (read: not enough for but one very small slimline hub/switch))

    10. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HDTV in the US IS ALWAYS COMPRESSED. In Japan, they have analog HDTV but, in the US, it is compressed digital audio/video. "The video compression will be a variant of MPEG-2, and the audio will be Dolby AC-3 (basically a five-channel system)." from HDTV

    11. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      Hi definition uncompressed video is more than 100Mb/sec - but 1Gb/sec over copper is on the horizon.

      Actually, high-definition uncompressed video (HD-SDI, as used in broadcast facilities) is 1.485Gb/s*, but you're very unlikely to find that in the home (or indeed, on any equipment costing less than $x0,000 dollars). And yes, it does run over copper! I forget for how long, but it's at least 50 metres, maybe 100.

      I believe the usual US standard bit-rate for transmitting compressed HD video over the airwaves is 30Mb/s. (Compare to SD (normal) TV where the figures are 270Mb/s and 6Mb/s, the ratio's about the same.)

      So, you ain't gonna need much more than 30Mb/s in a domestic situation, even for HD video - unless you're going to be installing a full HD production suite, ;-) and copper should handle it just fine.

      * - 2200 pixels * 1125 lines * 2 samples (Luma & Chroma) per pixel * 10 bits per sample * 30 frames/second = 1.485e9. And before some smartarse points out that HD resolution is 1920 x 1080, that's only the active picture area. The full frame including blanking (which is used for things like embedded audio etc.) is 2200 x 1125. In one fairly common variant of the HD standard anyway, there are so many...<grin>

    12. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by dchat · · Score: 1

      I recently wired my place with Cat5. I tried to patch Cat5 as speaker extension cable and my advice is .. don't! I'm sure there's a good techo explanation but it could'nt handle any load - ie. turning up the volume without shorting out.
      Just my experience.
      Btw. my wiring was external - and I use low profile ducting with is pretty un-noticable... so don't panic if you don't get EVERY location covered first time around.

    13. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      However, 2 per room is not enough. There are a number of reasons for this:

      The only reason you give that is not solved by hubs or switches would be location. Odds are, anything you want to carry over copper will work with FE or GigE. 5 port FE switches are down to about $40-$100 depending on quality.

      While that seems like a hodgepodge, keep in mind that as long as you don't have cables running between rooms, that won't be a problem for you, because everything will be logical. The problems (besides things breaking) are usually in complex systems, and we're not talking about any individually complex components by modern standards.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by tkrabec · · Score: 1

      Why not just run conduit to drop points in each room, bringing them to wiring closet. Then the cost of running new cable as things change or they break, becomes simple. Label all of the conduits descriptively. Be sure to do a little research on bend radius of fibre. I would put 2 drops near each power outlet (1 network/phone, 1 catv/speakers)

      Where I work we do not run anything less than cat 5 for the structured wiring, and it is all to punch pannels. The wall plates are all have 3 taps.

      -- Tim

      --
      TKrabec Pahh
    15. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by juventasone · · Score: 1
      S-Video can be fussy. Its heavily dependant on the output device's signal strength and the grade of cabling. We couldn't get a camcorder to transmit 30m on some decent shielded cable, yet a VCR would. Anyhow, S-Video is old technology which is currently be replaced by component video (in various forms).

      Line audio signals are never as fussy, but you'll still run into the same problems as above (to a lesser degree). Atleast you'll be able to use more standard cabling like RG6 or RG8. And traditional analog audio is being replaced by digital audio through optical and digital coaxial cabling, which will have even shorter runs.

    16. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by dpotter · · Score: 1
      Don't bother with fibre. It's not going to get used. People have been saying "fibre is the next big thing" for 5 years now - and cable just keeps catching up

      Ugh. While I was as pleased as anyone that we were able to extend the functionality of twisted-pair to 125Mhz(Cat 5e) and 250Mhz(Cat 6), it's a pity that this has been widely interpreted as a sign that twisted-pair copper will indefinitely keep pace with fiber.
      This just isn't true, and the sorry fact is that although cat-6 is in the marketplace, it only doubles the bandwidth of cat-5e, and at a premium cost (with today's run rates). Even worse: the few remaining communication standards intiatives that were planning on using cat-6, like 1000BASE-TX (not 1000BASE-T!), have lost all momentum in the marketplace.
      Simultaneously, dozens of new standards have been announced or delivered for fiber. AFAIK, there currently isn't much development behind any copper-based high bandwidth standards. Most of the new high-bandwidth technologies aren't even looking at copper. 10GB Ethernet, for example, is defined as a fiber-only technology. And there are dozens of new high-speed projects on fiber, from 10GE through 2G/10G Fibrechannel to DWDM.

      Video over Cat5 is cheap

      If you're talking about NTSC over twisted-pair, I'd recommend against it. I notice significant rollof of high frequencies with high-quality baluns on Cat 6. Cat 5 is much worse. Coax is still the cable of choice for video.
      On the other hand, if you're talking about video over ethernet or some other form of (presumably MPEG) distribution, sure this will work great if you have ethernet-enabled video equipment. My TV isn't.

      Hi definition uncompressed video is more than 100Mb/sec - but 1Gb/sec over copper is on the horizon.

      Uncompressed HDTV is about 1.5Gbps. 1Gbps ethernet over copper has been shipping for over a year: 802.3ab

      Bottom line: For my money, I'd install a duplex of multimode fiber to each room. It's not significantly more expensive than Cat-6, and it's guaranteed to have a longer life.

    17. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by Colin · · Score: 1
      If you're talking about NTSC over twisted-pair, I'd recommend against it. I notice significant rollof of high frequencies with high-quality baluns on Cat 6. Cat 5 is much worse. Coax is still the cable of choice for video.

      Actually, I'm talking about PAL over Cat5, because I'm in Europe ;-). I agree baluns are not the way to do it - however, there exist active solutions which can be set up to compensate for the HF rolloff. Reviews that I've read on such units (eg, google for Kat5), suggest that over normal domestic distances, they're fine.

    18. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by testpoint · · Score: 1
      Conduit is an excellent suggestion. 10 years from now you'll want something you didn't put in the wall.

      In 1988, I built a house and put an infrared receiver in the ceiling of every room. The receivers were wired back to a closet in the center of the house that was large enough to hold a server. Cables were run from the closet to the study. The only change I would make would be to run the cables in conduit.

    19. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • There used to never be enough power outlets in rooms. Then that changed over the past few decades

      Depends. My house was built in 1988, has on average 4 outlets per room, and I still needed to add 6 x 4-gang strips to power all my toys.

      I fully agree with the sentiment that you can't put too much cable in. Skimp now, and you'll be paying later to put in hubs or switches in every room.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    20. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      x-10 is WAY out of date. Go lonworks (echelon.com) which enables devices to become smart instead of being dumb remote control.

    21. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by Harik · · Score: 1
      Wow! Score 5 - (Bad Moderation)

      However, 2 per room is not enough. There are a number of reasons for this
      They're never where you want them.

      ... and therefore, you should have 10-15 drops per room. Bzzt. Mmm, planning.

      Once you've got the cables in, you'll see more uses.

      ... and you always will. Thats why god gave us an amazing bit of technology called a "Switch". What, you're really going to use 10gig to every station all the time? Riigghht.

      When building, it's cheap

      ... except when you have to get it past the inspectors. You DO have low-voltage certification in your state, don't you? And don't forget how cheap plenum is as opposed to normal cat5... on the order of what, 65c/foot for plenum compared to 5c/foot normal in the bulk you'd be buying for a house?

      Huge SARCASM warning, for those who don't get it.

      There's lots of expenses involved in cabling while-building. Secondly, don't even THINK about following the phone lines. They're done ultra-cheap, daisy-chained throughout the house. No, you cannot daisy-chain ethernet, and do you really want to run a token-ring or FDDI/CDDI? Didn't think so.

      If you _REALLY_ want to do it right, install (empty) wall boxes, attached to metal conduit going either up to the attic or down to the basement cieling, with nylon cords in them to pull things through later. Then you can use the technology-de-jour or add those extra Cat-9 12-pair wires that you just HAVE to have 5 years from now.

      As for fiber/copper, there's 1gig copper now. Been out for years, in fact. Networld+Interop 99 in atlanta had it running over barbed-wire fencing, which was funny as hell.

      You probably won't need more then 2 locations per room, but try to place them intelligently... having cords strung everywhere is always ugly.

      Computers require power (Yea, duh, but you'd be surprised how many people don't plan for this) so put your drops near the power outlet. You can always run VoIP internal to your house, so no need for phone-lines everywhere.

      As for what to run initially, Fiber to the Desktop is Bad (tm). The first time you push your computer back against the wall is when you realize exactly how big a mistake it is. Fiber between switches is a good idea, since fiber bandwidth is generally 10x copper at any given point in time, and is also way above what any PC needs.

      Fiber DOES let you have a SAN, though (Storage Area Network) and there is some support in linux for distributed/shared disks/filesystems. (Not stock, search for GFS patches... possibly getting old now) A nice scalable SAN is great fun, plug another FC drive in the tower and every machine in the house gets an extra 36gig. Get a DVD jukebox with a few drives and anyone can watch DVDs from anywhere, all at once.

      DVD is VBR, average 4.5Mbps (Generally) The spec allows for rates as high as 10Mbps, but anything higher then that will not work on older players. So, don't plan on needing more then around 10Mbps for DVD video

      As for HDTV, it would be quite stupid to run it uncompressed, since that's around 1.5Gbps. HDTV broadcasts are bandwidth-limited to 19.3Mbps, so use that.

      --Dan

    22. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by kentborg · · Score: 1
      I believe the usual US standard bit-rate for transmitting compressed HD video over the airwaves is 30Mb/s.

      ATSC (the broken US DTV system) has a data rate is 19 Mb/s, using 8VSB modulation.

      DVB (used system nearly everywhere else) uses COFDM modulation and can go a bit higher if broadcaster assumes viewers are in good circumstances, a tad lower for rather robust signals, or a lot lower for completely bullet-proof signals (say, after a storm when both transmitter and receiver antennas are damaged). DVB can also do hierarchial modulation where some of the bits are really easy to receive (enough for roughly regular quality TV) but most of them require a better antenna (enough bits for HDTV).

      And before some smartarse points out that HD resolution is 1920 x 1080, that's only the active picture area. The full frame including blanking (which is used for things like embedded audio etc.) is 2200 x 1125.

      First, digital HD is flexible and doesn't have a single precise dimension or frame rate (hell, some try to call interlaced video high definition). There are acquisition dimensions, post processing dimensions, emission dimensions, and display dimensions, all of which can theoretically (and really should) be different for a single program, and different for different programs. And if watching a 24 fps movie 24 fps is a sensible frame rate, but if watching basketball 60 fps is much more appropriate.

      Second, digital TV doesn't transmit analogue blanking areas as part of a raster, and it doesn't put audio in these non-existent blanked picture areas either. Yes, audio has to be there, but once the picture gets very good the number of bits needed for killer 5.1 audio isn't a big part of the budget.

      Third, though there are multiple ways to code color, for human consumption they all require 3 values, but your example suggests "chroma" is a single value. An important reason for having a luma and two color signals is to give luma more bits and spend fewer bits for color (which matches the human vision system). In RGB one has to give all the colors the same number of bits.

      -kb

    23. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      ATSC (the broken US DTV system) has a data rate is 19 Mb/s, using 8VSB modulation. DVB (used system nearly everywhere else) uses COFDM modulation..

      Fine. I won't attempt to disagree with you as I'm not familiar with the finer points of US digital TV transmission. I'd heard somewhere that they were doing 30Mb/s, but I'm quite prepared to admit I'm wrong on this point. However if that's the case it bodes rather ill for the HD picture quality those folks will be getting.

      ...HD resolution is 1920 x 1080...full frame...is 2200 x 1125

      First, digital HD is flexible and doesn't have a single precise dimension or frame rate...

      You don't need to tell ME that! :-) I write software for high-definition broadcast video switchers ("vision mixers" in some English dialects)... I did point this out in my original message:

      In one fairly common variant of the HD standard anyway, there are so many...<grin>

      ...as indeed there are. The SMPTE-260M, 274M, 292M & 296M standards and an RP or two define no less than 17 different HD standards, with frame rates varying from 23.98Hz to 60Hz, and active picture areas from 1440x720 to 1920x1080; and recently people are threatening even more... I could list their titles from memory (I sorted out the menu list for them in the damn switcher myself!), but it would be more fun to list them with all their intimate details, but to be honest I don't keep those in the house, sorry. Maybe tomorrow night...

      There are acquisition dimensions, post processing dimensions, emission dimensions, and display dimensions...

      Quite so, but as far as us switcher designers are concerned, there's the active picture area (how much we have to actually process) and the total frame area (how much data we have overall). And as we move from analogue to digital transmission, many of these apertures become the same. For the most common HDTV standard in use today (1080i) I gave the correct figures (although I simplified by saying the frame rate was 60Hz when in fact it's more usually 59.94Hz, resulting in a bit rate that's not *quite* 1.485Gb/s but is in fact (1.485/1.001)Gb/s)

      And if watching a 24 fps movie 24 fps is a sensible frame rate, but if watching basketball 60 fps is much more appropriate...

      I couldn't agree more, as do ABC, among others, who have adopted the *other* most popular HDTV standard, 720p/59.94. 60ish progressive frames per second much better for that sort of thing than interlacey crap.

      Second, digital TV doesn't transmit analogue blanking areas as part of a raster, and it doesn't put audio in these non-existent blanked picture areas either.

      What digital TV does or doesn't *transmit* I know not. However uncompressed HD video, as shipped around studios at 1.485Gb/s on coax, which is what I was talking about at that point, most certainly DOES transmit large amounts of blanking (ridiculously so in 50Hz standards) into which is placed various control data including embedded digital audio. Fact.

      Third, though there are multiple ways to code color, for human consumption they all require 3 values, but your example suggests "chroma" is a single value.

      Yup, I oversimplified. So sorry. This was because this was an answer to a comment about the amount of bandwidth needed to ship compressed HD video round a house, rather than a full dissertation on broadcast video techniques (I was worried that I'd overdone it as it was).

      The full story? Well no, because I'm not a colorimetry expert and am not about to start quoting RGB->YCbCr (a.k.a. but not quite the same as YUV, YIQ, YPbPr) conversion equations. So let's aim somewhere in between...

      Broadcast digital telly, as shipped around inside studios, be it standard definition (SDI = 270Mb/s) or high definition (HD-SDI = 1.485Gb/s) has half the horizontal color resolution than it does luma resolution. So SDTV has a horizontal resolution (active area) of 720 luma pixels, but only 360 chroma pixels (or more strictly speaking, samples). Likewise HDTV has - usually - either 1920 or 1440 luma pixels across but only 960 or 720 chroma pixels across. The samples are transmitted thusly:
      Cb Y Cr Y Cb Y Cr Y...
      where Y is a luma sample, Cb is a blue-related sample (B-Y) and Cr is a Red-related sample (R-Y). The Cb and Cr samples taken together specify the color for their two adjacent Y samples.

      In my original piece it was quicker and easier just to say "* 2 samples (Luma & Chroma) per pixel" rather than go into all that, n'est-ce pas?

      An important reason for having a luma and two color signals is to give luma more bits and spend fewer bits for color (which matches the human vision system).

      Exactly. The above is what is known as 4:2:2 encoding (or strictly speaking, in HD, 22:11:11); however some camcorder-type and semi-pro formats take things further by reducing the number of chroma samples even more. Two common schemes are to have one pair of chroma samples horizontally for every four luma samples (4:1:1, which is really quite grotty) or to keep the ratio 2:1 horizontally but also make it 2:1 vertically (so each pair of chroma samples covers two pixels and two lines), known as 4:2:0.

      In RGB one has to give all the colors the same number of bits.

      True...more or less. Don't some palette systems allocate 16 bits to RGB as 5:6:5, on the grounds that Green has the most luma content? Not in broadcast, though...we only deal with RGB at the *very* sharp end of the camera and in the middle of chroma keyers...

      Happy now? ;-)

  5. Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Keefesis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As long as you're using shielded cat5 cable and your phone lines are shielded, you shouldn't have a problem running them through the same conduit. Be aware, however, that if you run your cat5 cable within 6 inches (safe margin) of electrical sources, you will see interference and will experience performance problems. I'm not sure what your electrical people are doing, but it's common to place electrical outlets near phone outlets (fax machines, cordless phones, etc). Just FYI, be aware of this.

    1. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Fozz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, phone lines are low-voltage and should not represent much of an interference problem with your ethernet signals. Keeping your CAT5 at least 6-12 inches away from any 120V AC lines running parallel is always a good idea.

      Always cross your CAT5 and 120V power cables as perpendicular as possible to avoid crosstalk.

    2. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Kallahar · · Score: 2

      Phone lines have 40V nominal and 80V+ rings. Low voltage is < 12V. You're right though, they usually don't interfere with other devices.

      Travis

    3. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by reconbot · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry phone lines are not low voltage and they do cause interference with CAT5 cable. But it doesn't have too much to do with voltage and more with frequency. Phone lines run at a much higher frequency (around 2.6khz) then power lines, but they only run at around 60v (I believe). Power lines run around 120v @ 60hz, while the voltage is higher the frequency is much lower (43 times).

      What all this means is that phone lines have a shorter range but can cause more interference, and power lines have greater range but won't completely wreck the signal.

      Just remember to use shielded cable at all times, you'll thank yourself for it later.

      --
      I'm just this guy, you know?
    4. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      Also steer clear of flourescent lights, if you are installing any. From what I've been told, the ballasts put off a lot of EMF noise, particularly when they go bad.

      -----

    5. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try +/- 192V -- I'm measured it with my own eyes.

    6. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by oven · · Score: 1

      Cat 5 cable has eight wires, or four pairs, if you prefer. You can run almost anything through the same cable. I use two pairs for ethernet and two pairs for ISDN -- no packet loss and no disturbance on my calls. Just keep one thing in mind: The reason the cable is twisted is to prevent interference. Two parallel wires makes an antenna. Picks up anything. Two wires twisted together picks up virtually nothing. Bottom line: Don't run video through the blue and ISDN through the white-and-blue. You get the picture.

      But why be happy with just phone and net? Experiment a bit! You can use Cat 5 for just about anything with low voltage. A friend of mine uses it for composite video. I expect plain audio signals to travel excellently through the cat 5. Use your imagination.

      And, by the way, add some good, strong cotton string with all your cables. That way it is a lot easier to pull through new cables after you've put up all the walls and painted. Pull a new string through with your newly added cable, and you can do it again :)

    7. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by shepd · · Score: 2

      >Two wires twisted together picks up virtually nothing

      No, they pick up twice as much as a single untwisted wire.

      The reason why they seem immune to noise is because the receiver doesn't look directly at the voltage on the cable (such as a TV does), but instead it looks at the difference between the voltages on the pair. This means that if a 60V spike is induced near the pair, both wires go up 60V but when you subtract (for example) 72V from 60V you end up with 12V, thereby removing the interference.

      The twist ensures the interference is equal. Without the twist, the level of interference on one line could be greater than the other, thereby degrading the signal.

      I expect that the ground cable is providing a minimal amount of sheilding because the twists case it to "wrap" around the signal wire, thereby ensuring you get some kind of picture.

      >A friend of mine uses it for composite video.

      I'm very surprised this works. Analog video signals don't do a difference voltage check; One wire is expected to be directly tied to earth, which would short out the transmitter if it were differential.

      >And, by the way, add some good, strong cotton string with all your cables.

      Agreed, but don't use cotton. As it is organic after a few years it will rot, and then you're SOL. Use something inorganic, like that "cheap" twine you see the phone company installers carry about with them.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Zebaulon · · Score: 1

      Yes, audio signals travel just fine through the CAT5 cable. At the office, our phone lines and phone system reside in my office. The telco was supposed to move the POTS lines to the server room, so I ran a CAT5 drop between there and my office to bring those lines to the phone system until we moved it. That's been 5 or 6 months ago, and I now use that cable to feed audio from a computer playing MP3s to our phone system for hold music. Works like a charm!

    9. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people quote the RMS voltage, even when they don't know they are doing it...

    10. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Are you not paying attention to the above post?
      Be aware, however, that if you run your cat5 cable within 6 inches (safe margin) of electrical sources, you will see interference and will experience performance problems. I'm not sure what your electrical people are doing

      So, the person was talking about electricity mains - 110V~ current, not the decidedly non-destructive phone lines. The comment was merely pointing out that phone lines are usually terminated near power. Nonetheless, phone installers usually keep the line away from power for the same reason you'll want to keep your 'net (video, etc.) away from it.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    11. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by crucini · · Score: 3, Informative
      I'm sorry phone lines are not low voltage and they do cause interference with CAT5 cable.

      Anyone can define "low voltage" however he wants. Check out this link for some of the ways NEC seems to define low voltage. Most electricians would say that less than 600 volts is low voltage, and this is also how the state of California defines it..
      Phone lines run at a much higher frequency (around 2.6khz)...

      Phone lines carry the speech spectrum, roughly 300 hz to 3000 hz. They also carry DC (0 hz) and ringing current (20 hz). They can also carry square-edged pulses made by hanging up a phone with a mechanical switch, for example, or dialing with a mechanical rotary phone. Such pulses contain energy far up the RF spectrum. Of course, a phone line carrying DSL will have lots of high-frequency energy above 3000 hz.
      ... but they only run at around 60v (I believe).

      Phone lines use a nominal 48 volt battery. When you pick up the phone, most of that voltage is lost in the loop and you get 6 to 8 volts across the line. Ringing current is AC, ranging from 80 to 110 volts.
      What all this means is that phone lines have a shorter range but can cause more interference, and power lines have greater range but won't completely wreck the signal.

      Phone lines can run for many miles without significant loss of signal or power. 120 volt power lines cannot. If you live in a house in the US, your phone line probably goes several miles to the CO, but your power line goes straight to a nearby transformer that feeds it from a higher distribution voltage. As for interference, power lines don't just carry 60 hz - they carry substantial amounts of energy at higher frequencies, caused by motors, light ballasts, switching power supplies and other equipment. I think a power line is more likely to contribute noise to a data circuit than a phone line is.
    12. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by mpe · · Score: 2

      Two parallel wires makes an antenna. Picks up anything. Two wires twisted together picks up virtually nothing.

      Not exactly the twisting means that the signal picked up in each wire tends towards being 180 degrees out of phase. Such the resultant signals almost cancel each other out.

      You can use Cat 5 for just about anything with low voltage. A friend of mine uses it for composite video. I expect plain audio signals to travel excellently through the cat 5. Use your imagination.

      line level audio though. Even though the cable might be ok voltagewise for speakers it isn't going to be happy with the current.

    13. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by chuckfirment · · Score: 1

      "And, by the way, add some good, strong cotton string with all your cables. That way it is a lot easier to pull through new cables after you've put up all the walls and painted. Pull a new string through with your newly added cable, and you can do it again :)"

      No, Don't use cotton string. After it's been sitting in the walls for 20 years it will be dry and brittle. It will break if you're trying to pull a new cable through and catch a snag.

      Use nylon string or something that will not deteriorate with age.

      Chuck Firment

    14. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by autocracy · · Score: 2

      The post you replied to did NOT say that running cable near phone lines should be avoided - only that people tend to put electrical wires there, which you should avoid.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    15. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by jamoke · · Score: 0

      neither cat 5 nor phone lines are shielded.

    16. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Just remember that UTP/STP Cable is for low votage/amp stuff. Like Networks, Phones, Video, and Audio. Dont use UTP/STP on your "Speaker Out" Jacks on your AMP, only Line out/Pre-amp stuff.

  6. Phone wire?!?? by atporter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just use the Cat5 for everything. An RJ-11 will fit in an RJ-45 jack just fine. Tie it all back to a patch pannel in the basement and then you can patch phones/ethernet/whatever to your hearts content.

    1. Re:Phone wire?!?? by blacklambda · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just be careful... putting a 2-pair modular connector in the space for a 4-pair can bend the pins on the outside of the 4-pair.

      --
      Ryan Dorman, CCNA Network Communications Specialist Millersville Univesrity
    2. Re:Phone wire?!?? by gregorio · · Score: 0

      Not a problem, only gigabit connections use all 4 pairs

    3. Re:Phone wire?!?? by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Which is why I cut off the 2-pair modular connector on all my phones and connect them to a 4-pair plug.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      tell me about it.. I work for a university and you wouldn't believe how many ethernet ports we have to replace because someone could grasp the concept of the "data" and "phone" labels above ports and jammed their phone cord in the ethernet port and wiggled it around trying to get it to work before moving it to the phone one..

      Its not really a problem using 4-pair connectors for 2-pair stuff if the only thing going into it is 4 pair because you'll never use the pins that are bent anyway, but if you plug a 2 pair into a 4 pair connector that you plan to use for 4 pair connections later, you better plan on being able to punch down a new connector..

    5. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my university's residences, the ethernet and phone plugs are the same. The small phone plugs seem to fit fine, and don't wiggle around. Could these be special ports designed to take both? I haven't heard of any problems with them (except for one guy, who connected his ethernet card to the ethernet port with a phone cable, and couldn't figure out what was wrong).

    6. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So just lop off the end of that RJ-11 and put a 45 on it. Ends are cheap and the money you saved by skipping phone quality cable and running all Cat5 will offset the cost of a few measly connectors. And of course, no ruined jacks from bent pins. :) A complete Cat5 infrastructure (phones / network) works awesome. It's so nice to be able to run ANYTHING in ANY jack by going to your patch panel and using some patch cords.

    7. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Tipsy+McStagger · · Score: 1

      And remember to number each wall port. I'd wanna have something like U1, U2, U3 for upstairs, D1, D2 etc.. and then take them into the back of a patch panel in the wiring closet and label the front of them with the matching id.

    8. Re:Phone wire?!?? by fodi · · Score: 0

      What an ingenious idea. And I've been naming the network's ports after my favourite breakfast cereal.

    9. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (except for one guy, who connected his ethernet card to the ethernet port with a phone cable, and couldn't figure out what was wrong).

      One guy? Gee, you must have superior intelligence out there. In September, about half the residence network trouble calls received at the helpdesk here are solved by asking how many pins are at the end of the cable.

    10. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a problem, only gigabit connections use all 4 pairs

      Well, the problem is which two pairs you're using...

      Here's a hint: They're not the same ones as you use for the telephone.

    11. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you label the phone and ethernet jacks, though.

      Otherwise you might plug an ethernet card into a ringing phone line... Bad news. :(

    12. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We did this in a recent remodel of a 100 year old railway depot that we turned into a law office. We ran 4 separate CAT5 lines into each office or workstation location, terminating each in an RJ-45 plugin, not differentiating between data or voice. Same thing for fax machines and digital copier locations. Now, if an additional phone, fax, computer or whatever is needed in any particular office, even if just on a temporary basis, we generally have at least 2 spare RJ-45 outlets to use in each office. All we have to do is move around a couple of plugs on the main board to correspond to each numbered cable from the office and presto, whatever type connection is needed is up and running. Works really slick. I'm going to do the same thing in my new house to eliminate having to install duplicate telephone and data outlets.

    13. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you read "Wiring Strategies for voice and data systems." It is free at the leviton web site.
      Learning Center

      Yes! You should run Cat5e for all drops phone and network. If you do this you can change the number of network drops or phone lines in a room just by going to your wiring closet.

    14. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you read "Wiring Strategies for voice and data systems." It is free at the leviton web site.
      Learning Center

      Yes! You should run Cat5e for all drops phone and network. If you do this you can change the number of network drops or phone lines in a room just by going to your wiring closet.

    15. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and in the long run get yourself VoIP / H.323 phone equipment (cheap with free software and a PC as VoIP router). Ordinary plain old phone lines are no longer needed.

    16. Re:Phone wire?!?? by mpe · · Score: 2

      Just use the Cat5 for everything. An RJ-11 will fit in an RJ-45 jack just fine

      So long as you don't mind the risk of damaging pins 1 and 8 on the RJ45. No pin 1 means you can't use the socket for ethernet...

    17. Re:Phone wire?!?? by mpe · · Score: 2

      I work for a university and you wouldn't believe how many ethernet ports we have to replace because someone could grasp the concept of the "data" and "phone" labels above ports and jammed their phone cord in the ethernet port and wiggled it around trying to get it to work before moving it to the phone one

      The alternative would be to fit the telephones with RJ45s... Which is quite simple to do with the appropriate tools.

    18. Re:Phone wire?!?? by Tipsy+McStagger · · Score: 1

      I know.. it's a blinder of an idea.

      Took us a few naming schemes to come up with that one. None of the others were expandable enough when we wanted to add new drops in.

    19. Re:Phone wire?!?? by dave3138 · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. Where I work, we use cat5 for both voice and data. The only difference between the two are the colors of the cables and jacks. We usually can get away with plugging RJ11 (2 pair telco) wires into RJ45 (4 pair ethernet) jacks, but on occasion pins 2 & 7 will get pushed down in the jack and pop up in the wrong position. This typically only happens when I use and RJ-11 splitter. BTW we are using Lucent/Avaya jacks. So what I do instead, is recycle the old surface mount boxes and parts of old patch cables to create RJ-45 to RJ-11 assemblies on the cheap. Works well when I need multiple analog lines to an office that only has one RJ-45 for voice. I build a breakout cable on the patch panel end (normal ethernet config on one end and an RJ-45 end on each individual pair). This assembles the individual analog pair onto one cat5 cable. At the other end, I do the same but use the surface mount boxes. Sounds complicated but works slick. The local telephone people don't understand it though...

  7. fiber by yup2000 · · Score: 1

    make a fiber backbone, and design for future expansion...

    KISS

  8. Only if you know what you're doing by nephorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fiber can be a pain in the ass to put in. Make sure you don't touch the actual glass... you'll never get those splinters out.
    If you have the means to put in fiber, though, go right ahead... but don't get secondary support equipment for it, as that might change by the time you want to put it into use.

    1. Re:Only if you know what you're doing by Tuzanor · · Score: 2
      Make sure you don't touch the actual glass... you'll never get those splinters out.

      Lol! One of my telecom teachers was talking about that. He said in his younger years him and his buddies would always be doing that saying that it didn't do anything and they didn't feel anything. Now, he says, that he's older he's starting to notice them and it irritates his fingers and hands more and more...

      Another piece of sound advice with regards to fiber is DON'T LOOK DOWN THE GLASS IF ITS PLUGGED IN!! Fiber doesn't use those purty lights that you see at the end of those light strands you see in stores. It uses powerful and specific wavelengths of infrared and can damage your eyes like a solar eclips. The same telecom teacher as above says that you should always orient the fiber ports so that if you have to unplug them live, that it should hit your buddy standing beside you in the face, and not yours :-) Also because of that you should not place connections at eye level, because the server/router/whatever may still try to transmit down the line and instead hit your eyes.

    2. Re:Only if you know what you're doing by dave3138 · · Score: 1

      In-building short-haul fiber optic transceivers typically use LEDs [Light Emitting Diodes] to drive the fiber. This is almost akin to looking at your alarm clock. It's still not a wise idea to look into the fiber, as you might not know what type of light it's carrying...

  9. Price by utdpenguin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Im just guessing at numbers, but fiber is expensive now. It will get cheaper. Lets say the Cat5 isn't worth replacing for 10 years or so. In ten years fiber will be a _lot_ cheaper. Possibly cheap enogh to offset the cost and trouble of rewiring? Dunno, just thinking aloud.

    --
    In Soviet Russia you dant have to put up with these crappy jokes
    1. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he runs the wires through gently bending conduit he can pull new fiber whenever needed and it won't be a big deal.

  10. I don't know much about this.... by puppetman · · Score: 5, Funny


    but why don't you set it up so that in future years you can put in what ever cable you want?

    I always imagined having a duct built into the floor of my house, running along the walls, with a grate over top. I would run whatever in there, be it fibre or cat-5, etc.

    And if I ever went wireless, I could just fill it up with beer and use a really long straw.

  11. Hmm... by Merik · · Score: 1

    I don't know if the economics deem it worthy... Atleast for home usage, installing it now hoping it will be useful in a few years seems like a waste of money. By the time you maximize the usage of your current setup, there will probable be more attractive performance for price wireless products.

    But then again, if ya got the dough to blow... why not!

    --

    --

    What is the sound of this sentence?

    1. Re:Hmm... by isorox · · Score: 2

      If you spend $100,000 on a house, whats wrong with adding another $500 for wiring (and $1500 for a 52" tv ;) - doesnt make much of a difference in the long run.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know what kinda shit hole you plan on living in for $100,000.....

    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. One problem with fiber is that the 'standards' are so volatile. Since you won't need to be using it for a few years you'll have to make guesses as to what kind of cable and connectors to put in. At work we've got a million different fiber patch cables because of the shifting standards over the years (ST, SC, MTRJ, and now single mode for the long runs.) One option might be to not terminate the fiber until your going to use it, but a better solution is to run conduit so you can pull in whatever you need. Also: don't underestimate how long it will take to run the cable.

    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably one that has a "wide load" sign on it.

    5. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many parts of the US $100,000 buys you 2,000 square feet house in a decent neighboorhood. Nothing like the poor saps that have to pay $300,000 in Silicon Valley for a place half that size that's still a two-hour commute to work.

  12. Run conduit by jalewis · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you run conduit, no matter what happens, you can run new cable later.

    If it was me I would run the cat5e now and include a string with the pull. Later you can attach whatever cable you want and pull it through. It will be difficult if you don't have conduit.

    My future plans include 802.11a, so I am not worried about fiber. I just need one run to the middle of the house for my AP. I am using 802.11b now and I am happy with the speed/wire trade off.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Run conduit by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      I had no trouble pulling cat5 through smurf tubing (actually pushing) without a string. Even if I had, it's quite simple to attach a string to a bit of plastic bag and suck it through using a vacuum cleaner.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:Run conduit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best comment here. Conduit is the way to go. Well the realy way to go is to have access crawlways a la star trek. Run all your wiring and piping through this access way and then if you ever need to put in another socket for anything (svideo, audio, cat x, fibre...) it is easy and fast to run. Just as easy to put in a new sink because you have access to the pipe already from the crawlway. Any hey wouldn't it be cool to have that in your house?

    3. Re:Run conduit by jalewis · · Score: 1

      What is the diameter of that tube?

      I was thinking PVC pipe would be good, the main pipe in the middle of the house could be big and the room conduit could be smaller, with 45 degree angles along the way.

      Any reason not to use PVC?....besides cost?

    4. Re:Run conduit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes this is the best suggestion. At the very least, just run conduit to the places that will be a true bitch to get to later.

    5. Re:Run conduit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know the answer to this one, but how expensive is the actual fiber cable versus the connectors? What about running the cable and worrying about connectors later/when they are cheaper?

      Chances are the cable would be supported for a while, since commercial co's have so much buried. A safe bet, don't you think.

      I agree with most people though, do as much as you can in advance. Houses require foresight in the 10's of years...

    6. Re:Run conduit by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used 1/2" flexible NMT, aka smurf tubing, so-called because of its baby-blue color. It's big enough to hold three cat-5 wires. I would have preferred 1", or 3/4", but the 1/2" was all that the electrician's supply store had in stock. I realized that I wanted conduit shortly before the drywall was to go up; after I had installed all the cat5 I thought I would need.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    7. Re:Run conduit by LoadStar · · Score: 1

      I can't emphasize this post enough. Use conduit, use conduit, use conduit. If you think that you can accurately predict exactly how much wire you'll need and where, I'll let you buy some lottery tickets for me. I use the practice at work, and it is an unbelievable timesaver, being able to climb above the ceiling and just push wire through the conduit into the box.

      As for which kind of conduit, we personally use standard metallic in-wall electrical conduit running to standard electrical boxes. There may be some reasons to use non-metallic raceway, but I'm personally not aware of any such reasons, as long as the raceway is far enough away from conduit carrying electric wiring to meet code.

      It's a shame you had the phone run seperately from the networking plant. If it were me, I'd recommend running Cat5 or better for both phone and networking - one drop for phone, one drop for data, both in the same conduit. For phone, you could probably settle for Cat3 for cost reasons, but using Cat5 or better would allow you to switch a phone jack to a network jack fairly easily. Besides for this, going back later and trying to trace out both how phone runs AND how network runs... that's a hassle you shouldn't need to deal with.

      Fiber? Seems overkill for a home installation. Yes, they may go to fiber at some time in the future - but personally, I doubt it. Most home users probably won't saturate a 100-megabit network, and if they do, gigabit out and rapidly dropping in price. Besides, should fiber to the desktop become necessary in the future - well, that's what those conduits are for.

      Personally, I'd run a minimum of 1 phone drop and 2 data drops per room, minimum. (Note that's an absolute, bare bones, minimum.) In addition, I'd have the electrical contractor run multiple blank boxes with conduit per wall, and just have the boxes covered over with blank plates.

    8. Re:Run conduit by mpe · · Score: 2

      If it were me, I'd recommend running Cat5 or better for both phone and networking - one drop for phone, one drop for data, both in the same conduit. For phone, you could probably settle for Cat3 for cost reasons, but using Cat5 or better would allow you to switch a phone jack to a network jack fairly easily

      Also just using once type of cable could end up cheaper. Since worst case senario is that you end up having nearly a whole spool of cable unused for each different kind of cable you install...

    9. Re:Run conduit by dave3138 · · Score: 1

      For phone, you could probably settle for Cat3 for cost reasons

      Can a person even buy Category 3 cabling anymore?

    10. Re:Run conduit by Minuo · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, but yes....i saw it at home depot the other day when I was picking up some new inserts for my wallplates....

      --
      --minuo
  13. Don't do either yet. by Toodles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By the sound of the post, you feel that this is an urgent matter before the drywall goes up. It doesn't have to be. What you should be concerning yourself with putting in is conduit, not the wiring, if this is a house you plan on living in for a good long time.

    With good conduit, running wires is a fairly painless process. Install the conduit, let the contractors install the drywall, then run the cat5, fiber, whatever. After X many years, if you decide you need to upgrade to fiber or whatever is current enough for your needs, pulling the existing wire and replacing will be a cinch. By putting in the wiring now instead of conduit, you are speeding up the depreciation and obsolescense (sp?) of your house, not increasing it. Good conduit even helps with events you didn't plan, such as if you figure out you need to pull RCA cables for house-wide stereo, or additional coax, or whatever.

    Toodles

    --
    Toodles D. Clown
    1. Re:Don't do either yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have to agree with Toodles -- conduit is by far the best path to take. But realize this will more than double the initial cost, in both labor and materials. Even as a do-it-yourself project where labor is donated :) you will more than double your time. But then time *is* money.

      If cost is no object, install conduit. If a $60 spool of cat5e is stretchin' you budget, don't worry, the cat5e will work just fine.

      Whether you decide to install conduit or not, try to keep the runs (wall plate to central wiring point) under 100 meters. Gigabit ethernet is specified to run over cat5 cable up to 100 meters. There are cases where this distance is exceeded, but that is the spec for worst case.

      gigabit over cat5 reference:
      http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en _U S/50304702.pdf

    2. Re:Don't do either yet. by imrdkl · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Depending on the construction and how he will use the ceiling space, conduit could be quite a luxury. Most wood-frame houses dont have a speck of conduit, relying on romex through the upright members, typically 1-2 rooms per circuit. Conduit would be great, but requires a whole different kind of electrical contractor/installer, typically. (one who can use a pipe-bender quite proficiently)

      In any case, if you do use conduit, be sure to follow the rule of at least two, tagged fishlines on every pipe from every jbox, for later use of pulling new wire in to the existing pipe.

      Back on topic, I believe that ethernet in the walls is more than sufficient. One can always bridge to a fiber link at the termination in the future, but the last-mile question for fiber is far from being answered clearly, it seems.

    3. Re:Don't do either yet. by mnordstr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, you should absolutely use conduit. After 10, 20 or 40 years, you'll be swearing and kicking the walls when you realize you have to change all the wires and you don't have conduit (unless everything has gone wireless, but I doubt that).

      However, you should really think about what kind of conduit you plan to use. After 40 years, things tend to rotten, and if you have cheap conduit it might not last that long. And while installing it, you should make it the simplest task to upgrade all the cables. You still have to do that one day...

      And the cables you want to run really depend on what you use them for. But if you know you don't really need fiber now, you most probably don't need it after 5 or 10 years. Go with the cat5e. If you notice you need fiber after 10 years, fine, rewire your house, it will be easy because you used good conduits, and fiber will probably cost next to nothing after 10 years.

    4. Re:Don't do either yet. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Your assuming that the conduit would be metal. I think that regular PVC contuit would also work here. No need for bending. It's already pre-bent.

    5. Re:Don't do either yet. by LordNimon · · Score: 2

      Conduit may not be an option. It can be very expensive, and most builders won't even do it.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    6. Re:Don't do either yet. by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Don't forget to put a nylon cord in the conduit when you install it. When you go to run a new cable, it's a lot easier to pull it through than to try to push it or get a fishtape through the conduit. And when you run the new cable, pull a new section of cord through with it for the next time.

    7. Re:Don't do either yet. by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Conduit would be great, but requires a whole different kind of electrical contractor/installer, typically. (one who can use a pipe-bender quite proficiently)

      High voltage electricians are all trained to use a pipe bender, and at least among the unscientific sampling of the ones I work with frequently, all prefer to EMT conduit even when they could get away with flexible armored.

      Low voltage guys seldom use metal pipe and probably aren't as experienced. It's hard to say what kind of guys are actually on the job at most wood stick construction new homes. The worst part of running pipe in a new home might be trying to figure out where it would run, locating and keeping accessable the jboxes, and convincing your builder that this is something worth messing with his schedule.

      The latter part is key, since the building, GC, and subs have wicked schedules that can get thrown when some homeowner wants to do something different in the middle of construction, especially if it involves a trade or skill they don't do on a normal basis.

    8. Re:Don't do either yet. by jcostom · · Score: 2

      Perhaps I'm missing something here... Presumably he's paying the builder, so the builder does what? Builds. Builds what the customer is asking for. It's not like he's asking for something unreasonable.

      --

      The unsig!
    9. Re:Don't do either yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and don't forget that if you do want to run cable in the conduits... string helps. leave one in there to pull cable through with. and run conduits to any buildings you put outside, sheds, etc... never know.

      and no, 2 cat5e/room is too low. consider an 8-port per room setup.

      fiber's neat, but consider where your bottlenecks are. phone line? cable? how much computer-to-computer videoconferencing are you going to do? are you really -that- bored?

      ceiling lights are especially hard to networks. not everyone knows (our computer center didn't) not to run cat5 -right- over the ceiling light, regardless of how 'handy' that might be.

      consider different heights - what about video projectors at ceiling level or little panels at eye level that you might want to connect? nevermind...

    10. Re:Don't do either yet. by shroom · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I wish I lived in a different county. Here in DuPage County, IL, everything has to be conduit. We're one of just a few counties in the country (Cook being another one) where romex is illegal inside a wall without conduit. It can be quite annoying sometimes.

    11. Re:Don't do either yet. by imrdkl · · Score: 1
      I confess, I never ran metal pipe in walls in any wood-frame. Ceilings just a few times. It felt "troublesome", so flagged it.

      I really prefer 277, too. (Ever do the 480 shuffle? :)

    12. Re:Don't do either yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Note to ACs: I never read comments rated less than 1.

      Too Bad!

      >Conduit may not be an option. It can be very expensive, and most builders won't even do it.

      Then how the heck do all the office buildings get built? By the one or two builders in the city that can handle conduit? I hope not.

      Really, it isn't that hard (however, a skilled tradesman will do it right, whereas you might screw up). If for some reason you can't get it done with "regular" home builders, see if the plumber will run some dry pipes for you... They're pretty used to running pipes already.

      [I have a +2 account, just won't use it for people who want to sheild themselves from life]

    13. Re:Don't do either yet. by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Most builders will not do whatever you ask. If it's a custom home, then probably conduit will be installed if asked. But most homes are not built that way. Mine wasn't.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    14. Re:Don't do either yet. by crucini · · Score: 2
      Then how the heck do all the office buildings get built?

      The get built by a different set of folks. I've worked on residential, commercial and industrial construction, and they are totally different worlds. You could take an experienced residential electrician to an industrial job site and he probably couldn't identify most of the parts being installed. There are probably small towns where this isn't true because the same guy does everything.
      ... see if the plumber will run some dry pipes for you...

      Couple of problems with this. First, plumbing pipe is generally installed with hard 90's, not the sweep 90's of electrical conduit. Second, plumbers don't usually install pull boxes, nor would they know where those boxes are required by electrical code. Third, plumbers generally don't know electrical code at all. Which leads to: fourth: plumbing pipe is not UL listed as electrical conduit, even if it's physically almost the same thing.

      However this idea can work if you need fairly short, straight runs (no major planning required) and your inspector has already proved tolerant of such things.
    15. Re:Don't do either yet. by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

      The problem is, at least here in Ottawa, if you demand that your builder do something that isn't "the norm", the builder will just tell you to screw off and sell the house to someone else.

      Seriously, it's that bad up here. You're lucky if you can get them to build your house to code, with all of the windows and doors in the right place, and within 4 months of the schedule!

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    16. Re:Don't do either yet. by swb · · Score: 1

      There's no reason you couldn't run pipe in wood frame for data, voice or even power if you had a hard-on for it.

      The best solution is one that the new building across the street did -- a raised floor for the entire building. The fire code for this is weird and you might not be able to live in a building like this, but it's solve any cabling problems. It'd help to have all your carpeting be squares instead of roll for maintenance, but it'd be really cool, and it'd make your house taller.

      What runs on 277 besides industrial/commercial flourescent light ballasts?

    17. Re:Don't do either yet. by imrdkl · · Score: 1
      Oh, you meant that kind of high voltage...

      Um, not really my specialty, no.

      Worked on several computer centers with raised floors and wiretray, tho. Definitely the way to go if you can raise floors and/or drop ceilings.

    18. Re:Don't do either yet. by yakfacts · · Score: 2

      While that is true, high-voltage guys also don't care about bending, crushing, folding or otherwise destroying the integrity of your CAT-5.

      If you tell them that a bend in the cable will ruin it, or that it cannot handle greater than a 50lb pull force, they assume you are an idiot.

  14. Fiber or Not? by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

    Unless you really wanna spend mega dollars on the fiber, cat5e seems like the best choice. Although fiber doesn't experience Electro Magnetic Interference, if you run two fiber jacks to each room, you're gonna need something that's capable of plugging into that.

    If money is not a factor, I say run both Cat5e AND fiber. Use the Cat5 now, and you can always use the pre-run fiber in the future...

  15. Just run Cat5 for the phone lines by kerskine · · Score: 1

    You might just want to run Cat5 for the phones - it would simplify things and you might save a little bit. I'm planning on doing the same thing on an addition I'm planning. Now if I can only get some cheap fiber and termination hardware :^)

    --
    ****

    "I'd never want to join a club that would have me as a member" - G. Marx
  16. Cable Ducting by Escoutaire · · Score: 1

    How about just using slightly larger cable ducts in the walls? Then you can always thread more cables or fibres later without screwing up the plasterwork.

    Escoutaire

    --
    When a dream dreams the dreamer, the dreams the real.
  17. Combo by Karma+50 · · Score: 5, Informative

    How about this stuff

    A lot more expensive than plain cat5 though.

    --
    http://www.thehungersite.com
    1. Re:Combo by quantus · · Score: 1

      Does the convince of a bundle really justify the cost? how hard is it for a contractor to tape 5 wires to a "fish line" and pull it to the destination?

    2. Re:Combo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SmartHome also sells the same stuff.

      But this is a heck of a lot cheaper. I personally would like some CAT-6 or -7 STP matched up with the Quad-shielded RG6 to run through my home (project in progress), but this is the best I can find. There is _no_ need for fiber.

    3. Re:Combo by uspsguy · · Score: 1

      I have looked at this stuff in person at Home Depot. I think it was about a buck a foot. If I were wiring a new home, I think I'd go for it, everything in a nice flexable plastic conduit and pretty well future-proof.

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  18. Forget the Telephone Cable by GC · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may not be aware of this but you can use your Cat-5E cable to run your telephones over.

    I don't think you'll need Fibre - doesn't Cat-5E support gigabit speeds?

  19. fiber? for what? by Mes · · Score: 1

    cat5 runs gig ether just fine.. even in 10 years, would you really need more than that?

    1. Re:fiber? for what? by imgaming.com · · Score: 1

      Of course you wouldn't need more than that!
      Hell at home, my box still only has 640K RAM!

    2. Re:fiber? for what? by quantus · · Score: 1

      oh boy, remember our hero Mr. Bill...

      "640K [of RAM] ought to be enough for anybody"

      Just run the cables with a pull through wire and deal with it later... Just make sure the contracter angles the holes to go with the bend rather then a blunt 90 ( assumes timber frame )...

      If you have the money go for the conduit...

    3. Re:fiber? for what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing that sprung to mind was that after 10 years the miracle happens - scientists have finally understood how the senses REALLY work and are able to interface with them directly. And of course then you'll want to participate in a massively multiplayer virtual reality experience.

      If you're going to upload your senses and actions plus be able to download perfectly sharp vision and sound, sense of touch, smell, heat, pain... you could in fact need that gig.

    4. Re:fiber? for what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, always assume you'll need more someday. Remember back in the 80's Bill Gates said computers will never need more than 640k ? haha

  20. Use a pullwire for future enhancement by fbrehm · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ten years from now will I need/want fiber? If you string another wire along with the CAT5 cable, you can use it to pull something else through in the future. Just make sure it doesn't bind anywhere. When you pull the new fiber/firewire/whatever through, pull another pullwire along with it.

    During the summers between college semesters I helped wire a factory. It involved pulling a lot of wires through pipes. We always pulled a few extra wires for spares and to act as pullwires.

  21. Ducts by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

    Put in ducts and modular faceplates, so you can replace the cables when something better comes along. Have all the ducts go straight down to the basement, and a duct around the ceiling of the basement with access at each joint with a vertical duct, then put your router in some inobtrusve corner of the basement.

    Have fun.

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    1. Re:Ducts by mini+me · · Score: 2

      Running the conduits strait down to the basement is a good idea. From there you can run the wires above a false celing to your wireing closet. This would make adding new wires a snap, just start dropping wire down the conduit until you can see it in the basement. If the conduit is big so it doesn't get stuck on other wires you won't even need a string or anything to pull it through (you might need a little weight on the wire though).

      You could even put in some empty ducts for future expansion (maybe 3 or 4 on every wall) even if you don't need/want cable there right now. No need to even put the face plate in yet, you could always cut that later (just rememeber where they go!!!)

      As for what wires to use: Cat-5e is a great start. You can run basically everything over it, from your LAN (obviously) to your telephone, to your audio and even your TV. But if you leave room for upgrades it doesn't matter what the future holds...

  22. ten years is too long a time..... by CaraCalla · · Score: 1

    ... but for the next 3 years or so you will defnitly be fine with CAT5. Gig-Ethernet works over CAT5, there is even a standard for Fibre-Channel over CAT5. Nics with fibre-connectors still are expensive.

    In 10 years however you will probably wish that you had spent the few extra bugs to put in multimode fibres.

    Installing the two might be a compromise.

    Edgar

    Edgar

    1. Re:ten years is too long a time..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean singlemode fiber. It is far superior.

  23. Cost vs. Future by segfaultdot · · Score: 1

    If this is your dream house and you plan to live in it for the next 30+ years, then put in fibre and deal with the costs. But if this is a house you're going to live in for no more than 5 or so years, put in cat 5. This was a decision i recently faced not at home but at work. I know it's not the same thing, but it's a similar situation. The person before me put in Cat-3 cable (10 years prior) and used dummy terminals, and i had the joy of ripping out those Cat 3's and putting in something better (this is a 6-story building!) (Yes, i had some professional help, otherwise i'd still be running cables now). I had the option of using optical, as well.

    There's a fine line between using the cheapest thing you can find and ripping it out in five years (not a problem if you aren't going live in the house that long) and breaking the bank to run fibre which will be viable for some time to come.

    1. Re:Cost vs. Future by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      I've always thought that if I built a dream house, it would have a utility core that could access every room. Something like a 18-inch wide gap within the main central walls of the house that you could walk in. That way, I could route wires and install electronic equipment to my heart's content.

      Of course, the only proper entryway for something like this would be a button that makes a bookshelf swing open...

    2. Re:Cost vs. Future by hattig · · Score: 1
      I like the way you think! :)

      Yes, for my dream house:

      Stone walls (like a castle), 10 ft thick)
      Conduits that can take a person (think Star Trek conduits) with the wiring to each room
      Hidden entrances in each room to the conduits
      Video camera in all the guest rooms (oh, shouldn't write that here!)
      Moat
      Laser guns on turrets
      Army
      Medieval kitchen with feasts ever week
      Cat5e to each room - 4 drops per room to allow for rearrangements
      DECT telephone - only one drop per line required
      Closet with servers - each room will have "advanced" X terminals

      Anything else?

      Yeah, that sounds right. 10ft thick walls are more important than the electrical and networking wiring throughout my dream house. A harem would go down well (with me, if not the wife) as well.

    3. Re:Cost vs. Future by JacobO · · Score: 1

      Rock on.

      I had an idea for removable wall panels. I would have no problem installing panels of drywall that could be unscrewed to give access to the inside of the wall. Afterall, it works in other circumstances. Whether you are building your house or doing an electrical renovation, you could standardize on the size and placement of the panels, and then there really wouldn't be any problems in future.

      Infact, why not carry this to it's logical conclusion and use prefabricated walls built in sections that you could completely remove and reposition later on. Of course, they wouldn't be load bearing, but engineering has answers for that, right.

    4. Re:Cost vs. Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other plan is lay in conduit + Cat5 now, and pull the fiber later if/when it's needed. A decent conduit layout will allow this, and he won't need to spend money on expensive cabling until it's dropped in price.

      No 'ripping out', just reasonable pulling via the pull lines installed in the conduits when they were put in.

    5. Re:Cost vs. Future by squeegee_boy · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, a Jeffrey's Tube!

    6. Re:Cost vs. Future by Siva · · Score: 1

      I've always thought that if I built a dream house, it would have a utility core that could access every room. Something like a 18-inch wide gap within the main central walls of the house that you could walk in. That way, I could route wires and install electronic equipment to my heart's content.

      Of course, the only proper entryway for something like this would be a button that makes a bookshelf swing open...


      you think this is a great idea, until one day 8 years down the road...you've just started replacing all that outdated cat5e with a second run of fiber when you think you hear a noise coming from far off in one of the other corridors. you stop and listen, but hear nothing, so you return to your work. then, the noise again, louder; it sounds like something scratching along the drywall. you peer down the dark corridor. you definitely hear it now, and it's getting closer. you turn to run towards the access door, but the bookcase suddenly slams shut before you reach it! trapped, you stare into the blackness. the noise almost reaches you, but suddenly stops; silence. then, a warm, damp breeze flows past you: it's breath. it is here. it has come for you. you fail to scream in time...

      *ahem* sorry...got a little carried away there. anyway, good idea :)

      --Siva

      --

      Keyboard not found.
      Press F1 to continue.
  24. Fiber is unlikely by demaria · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fiber is highly unlikely to be necessary or desirable in the next 10 to 20 years in residential housing. Install Cat5E cable, it'll handle gigabit which should be fast enough for just about everything.

    Instead of spending money on fiber, spend money to install conduit. Conduit conduit conduit! Conduit is nice since you can later on pull fiber or additional wires more easily.

    1. Re:Fiber is unlikely by Anders+H�ckersten · · Score: 1
      Fiber is highly unlikely to be necessary or desirable in the next 10 to 20 years in residential housing. Install Cat5E cable, it'll handle gigabit which should be fast enough for just about everything.

      "640K ought to be enough for anybody"
      - Bill Gates, 1981

    2. Re:Fiber is unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the full quote:

      "640K ought to be enough for anybody to run DOS 2.0"
      - Bill Gates, 1981

    3. Re:Fiber is unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like nobody will ever need more than 64k of ram?

    4. Re:Fiber is unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither of you can provide a reference, so STFU. It's an urban legend.

    5. Re:Fiber is unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right! Conduit Conduit Conduit!!!

    6. Re:Fiber is unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      urban legend? No. CP/M had access to 64k. MS assumed 10x that would be sufficient, which is why only the lower 640k was accessible without skanky memory extenders to access memory above that.

    7. Re:Fiber is unlikely by patrikr · · Score: 1
      --
      All Glory To The Hypnotoad!
  25. In ten years... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In ten years everything will be 802.11. So does it really matter? Just run the cat5.

    1. Re:In ten years... by cheetah · · Score: 2, Informative

      God, I hope not. 802.11b is slow, at only 11mbps it can take quite a while to copy anything larger than a 100meg. Backing up a few gigs would be a nightmare... 802.11a is 54mbps and that is not too bad. But I will stick with GigE so I can push +20Meg/sec to my sever...

      josh

    2. Re:In ten years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In ten years we will have 802.11s, 1 Gigabit per second wireless networking at 18.4GHz.

      Hmmm. Shouldn't have said that, should I?

    3. Re:In ten years... by jalewis · · Score: 1

      It will be less than ten years.....

      Servers will still be hardwired, but all clients will be wireless.

    4. Re:In ten years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unless we can pull multi terabits per second over wireless in the space of one server room.

    5. Re:In ten years... by autocracy · · Score: 2
      Read The F-ing Comment: In ten years everything will be 802.11.

      Where the hell is the letter B? There is one in that sentence, and it sure isn't after the 11!
      --
      SIG: HUP
  26. Fiber to every room by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Do yu really need that much pr0n,
    that quickly,
    in every room?
    My god man, your a machine!!!

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Fiber to every room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this up

    2. Re:Fiber to every room by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

      thanks for trying. ;)

      --
      All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  27. Would upgrading be hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to upgrade the cable in 10 years maybe you can tie the new cable to the old. Then pull the old out of the wall while simultaneously installing the new.

  28. Both? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

    Fiber breaks fairly easily - its a big problem. You might put it in there, and have it work fine for a long time, and then something breaks SOMEWHERE and you don't know where, but you do know that you've lost your connection. Copper is far more durable. If you put in the fiber and the CAT5, you could use the cable as a backup.

    Having said that, 100Mb per second is pretty fast for games, X-clients/servers and harddrive reads and writes, unless you really want all the computers to act like one computer. Maybe that's what you want. I don't really care myself. If I want to work on another computer, I walk over to the other one and sit down. So even in the future, I'll probably always be happy with CAT5.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Both? by Peyna · · Score: 1
      unless you really want all the computers to act like one computer.

      Not unless he's got a super computer, 100 Mb/s is nothing compared to the speed of a computer actually being there. The only way to acheive that is if the processors are very close together, that kind of distributed processing works great. Distribution over ethernet = slowslowslow (but useful for large scale projects where time isn't of the issue.).

      Anyway, you need to study more about distributed computing and multiprocessor systems.

      Also, if you were running fiber, you wouldn't have any turns greater than 90 degrees, and you would put it in some kind of insulated conduit.

      Fiber doesn't break that easily unless it is shot by some freak accident (this has happened before), or the boats running it across the ocean happen to drop it on an old mine.

      With all the fiber crossing our oceans, I hope to hell it doesn't break that easily.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Both? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are going to install fiber, you should just spend the $thousands and get a reflectometer that can tell you how far into the cable the break is...

    3. Re:Both? by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ... our dorms here have a 10MBit connection, and using Terminal Services Client is about as fast as sitting at the machine, VNC is a little slower (just as fast in linux though).

      Over the 100MBit connections in the office, it REALLY is like sitting at the machine.

    4. Re:Both? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all the fiber crossing our oceans, I hope to hell it doesn't break that easily

      What, you think they're running single-mode patch cables across the oceans? More like insulated, metal-sheathed cables. If something breaks them, its likely caused due to a huge weight crushing them.

    5. Re:Both? by itachi · · Score: 1

      Fiber doesn't break if you install it properly, ie, where it doesn't get messed with. Yes, it gets backhoed, yes, you can kill it with a hammer, yes, you can bend it too hard. However, if it is working right when it is installed in the conduit, it won't mysteriously break inside the conduit.

      itachi

    6. Re:Both? by BJH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like Godzilla.

    7. Re:Both? by Netmogul · · Score: 1
      The Siecor Gold fiber we have at the office is some pretty tough stuff. We cram it through cube conduit, drop desks on it, pull it (hard), push it, bend it, stretch it.

      So far I haven't managed to break any of it. Not that I'm trying, mind you. But just realize that I'm not exactly being careful, either. It's quite a bit tougher than everybody thinks.

    8. Re:Both? by MattXonn · · Score: 1

      With all the fiber crossing our oceans, I hope to hell it doesn't break that easily. Well it does happen. In fact it happened a several months ago near Singapore. It affected access to US sites from Australia very difficult.

    9. Re:Both? by Peyna · · Score: 1
      TSC is alot different than what he implied. I can get the same effect from just about any broadband connection to my cable modem at home.

      But you're seeing images of what it is like to be on the machine. As far as getting actual data back to your machine and not just your monitor is a different situation all together.

      Same thing with VNC, it's just screen captures, not the actual data being sent back. (which is why it is quicker to browse the web for me from my parents house using VNC to my pc at home (since they only connect at 28800 bps)

      --
      What?
    10. Re:Both? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, I know, but it was alot easier to make my point saying it my way. Besides, who would run fiber around a house without putting it inside something? I'm sure mice would love to munch on it, and unlike copper wires, it won't electrocute them either.

      --
      What?
    11. Re:Both? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copper may be more durable for those tight
      turns, but fiber eliminates the NEXT-A and NEXT-B problems that you would normaly have with copper. NEXT-A and NEXT-B stands for, "Near End Cross Talk." This is when your copper wire will experiance inside interferance from other wires inside the cable. Fiber using any type of LAN, like FDDI or even Ethernet does not have to deal wiht that, being that fiber doesent use electrical signals.

      Copper will also experiance outside interferance like EMI and RFI that fiber gets away with.

      For the money use copper, but for the performance use fiber.

    12. Re:Both? by autocracy · · Score: 2

      Kevlar is tough stuff, that's why they use it on fibre...

      --
      SIG: HUP
  29. Running wires/fiber etc... by thebigbadme · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dropping wire down the inside of a wall isn't a hard task (even with drywall up); all that needs to be done is to first find a spot (inbetween studs) that you want the wire to come thru, put a hole in the wall (small hole, about the size of an american quarter), get above the wall (this is hard with a ceiling, but i have seen it done from crawl-spaces) to the desired location along with a nut and some string (fishing line works great).
    Tie the nut to the line, and lower it down to aprox. the location of the hole. Tie the other end of the line to your wire/fiber etc... and get yo' ass back to your hole. Now fish (thru the hole) your line/nut and pull it out of the hole. Eventually your wire will come following along. So hypothetically, if you didn't lay fiber now and wanted to put it down later (or whatever other new fangled cable types we discover in the next 10-20 years) all you would need is to have some way of getting above the walls.

    As far as co-running your lines with the phone lines, you might want to inform anyone else working on your house as to what you've put in, you wouldn't want to later discover that some phone-co employee has removed your extra wires thinking that they were mistakenly laid phone line. (get the idea?)

    I'd say run fiber now, it's fairly cheap and even if you never hook it up to a computer you could always have cool looking dots of light scattered about your house to really confuse others in the dark.

    --
    "It's the Law of the Universe, and I'm the sheriff." Slash-cott 2/10-2/17
    1. Re:Running wires/fiber etc... by Rozpoo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I always found it easier to just find the cable lines. Because they are pretty much in every room, you can just tie the cat5 wire to the cable line along with some string. Go up to your attic and just pull the whole thing up, then untie the cat5 wire and pull the cable back down with the string. They even sell face plates with both an ethernet port and place for the tv cable. That way you dont have to put more holes in the wall. Just a lot easier in my opinion.

    2. Re:Running wires/fiber etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pardon me for saying, but you are an idiot. Just fish a pull down to the hole, and the pull up your wire. Have you ever had to much of that? Because you certainly are not doing it correctly,(with a steel or fiberglass fish) and it is a pain in the goddamned ass.

      Did you not read the five hunded or so posts by people who were nto morons?
      Just run a data conduit.

    3. Re:Running wires/fiber etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah sometimes fishing a cable inside a wall is a simple process, but sometimes unexpected difficulties make it almost impossible or at least make it take an assload of a lot more work than is reasonable. Trust me. It's far better to plan ahead (with conduit or some such) than to just trust that you will be able to fish more lines into the wall later.

    4. Re:Running wires/fiber etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wanted to remind you of one thing a lot of people have in their walls that would prevent this operation: insulation.

    5. Re:Running wires/fiber etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dropping wire down the inside of a wall isn't a hard task (even with drywall up); all that needs to be done is to first find a spot (inbetween studs) that you want the wire to come thru, put a hole in the wall (small hole, about the size of an american quarter), get above the wall (this is hard with a ceiling, but i have seen it done from crawl-spaces) to the desired location along with a nut and some string (fishing line works great).

      ... unless it's an outside wall full of insulation as most new housing is likely to be. Conduit with an included pullcord is the only way to go.

    6. Re:Running wires/fiber etc... by crucini · · Score: 2

      Sometimes it's that easy, and I've done that. Other times the wall includes a "firebreak". This is a piece of 2x4 nailed transversely between the studs, and it can really put a crimp in this plan. The solution is to drill through the firebreak with a diversabit - a long flexible drill bit. Because it's hard to guide the diversabit to the center of the firebreak, you risk breaking out through the drywall.

  30. Fiber is still expensive by Maktoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right now, I wouldn't even consider using fiber.

    You would need a lot of other hardware to make it work.

    With Ethernet, hubs and switches are cheap... you can wire everything back to a patch box and from there have it connect to your ADSL or cable modem.

    I'm not sure what the costs are on actual fiber cable, but it's certainly not as cheap as CAT5. What's more, you would either need a NIC in your computer capable of accepting fiber (over $US300 I think) or you would need a Fiber-->CAT5 converter box at each point where fiber comes out of the wall. Those boxes aren't cheap either.

    Really, it just comes down to this. If you want super-fast communication between your computers in your house, and are willing to pay a hefty premium, them fiber it is. But it's not going to make your Internet connection much faster. Your Internet connection will only every be as fast as whatever the Cable or DSL modem has going out... and that's usually a 10Mbs connection running at 2Mbs download max.

    Personally... if you want scalability, I would just make sure that the CAT5 you string is high quality and has *all eight conductors*... that way it is good for Gigabit Ethernet... which is slowly coming down in price and is already more affordable than Fiber for LANs.

    enjoy

    1. Re:Fiber is still expensive by DaEvOsH · · Score: 0

      Read the question. He is not asking if he should use fiber now. He is asking if he should wire for a future use of fiber...

    2. Re:Fiber is still expensive by kerskine · · Score: 1

      I just checked out Blackbox and found fiber cable for $620 / 1000'. Pricey, but a consideration. Since I have fiber at my phone pole, I figure some day AT&T or Verizon will figure out a way to bring it the extra 50' to my house.

      --
      ****

      "I'd never want to join a club that would have me as a member" - G. Marx
    3. Re:Fiber is still expensive by demaria · · Score: 2, Informative

      "If you want super-fast communication between your computers in your house, and are willing to pay a hefty premium, them fiber it is."

      Cat5E does gigabit. Current consumer hard drives can barely sustain flooding fast ethernet, let along gig. Fiber (and some will argue gig) to consumer and midrange machines are overkill and will remain so for some time.

      However, Linksys has just released an 8 port gigabit switch for $189.

    4. Re:Fiber is still expensive by demaria · · Score: 2

      >I'm not sure what the costs are on actual fiber cable, but it's certainly not as cheap as CAT5.

      The price (as of about 2 weeks ago) for 1,000 feet of bulk Cat5E (PVC) from www.datacommwarehouse.com is $99.99, plenum is $279.99, two-wire PVC fiber costs $329.99, and two-wire plenum fiber is $349.99.

      Yes, I know datacomm isn't the cheapest place out there. :)

    5. Re:Fiber is still expensive by blackwizard · · Score: 2

      As this post points out, fiber is still expensive in that the interconnect equipment, etc, is expensive. The cable itself is, however, pretty cheap. I don't see how it could hurt to install it now while it's easy if you forsee using it in the future. You can always pull the (cheap) cable through, and install ends and what not later.

    6. Re:Fiber is still expensive by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      What's missing in the whole discussion on fiber wiring is the fact that firstly, you had better decide on the right type (single mode / multi mode) and the right connector standards (ST / SC / FCPC / E2000 et al). If you fail to define your needs properly, you're almost certain to choose the wrong type, because then the access equipment (hub, switch, modem, mediaconverter) comes with exactly the type of connector types you don't have installed.
      In the case of an in-house installation for mostly computer networking needs, you should stick with plain cat5e. If you really fancy fiber, then go with multi mode fibers and ST/SC connectors, because that's what you will find on most equipment.

  31. Criswell Predicts by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Good point. Certainly a better approach than trying to predict what kind of networking technology will be "in" ten years from now!

  32. Wireless by tetrad · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why not forgo the whole cabling experience and go wireless instead? You can connect every room in the house with a single hub. It's cheaper than buying the cable and hub/switch, and a whole lot more convenient.

    1. Re:Wireless by rongage · · Score: 1

      Why not forgo the whole cabling experience and go wireless instead? You can connect every room in the house with a single hub. It's cheaper than buying the cable and hub/switch, and a whole lot more convenient.

      ...and your neighbors will greatly appreciate the free bandwidth you are providing them...

      --
      Ron Gage - Westland, MI
    2. Re:Wireless by zilym · · Score: 2

      I disagree. With wireless, you've got higher latency, considerably slower speeds due to it being a shared medium, and usually higher costs.

      With his golden opportunity with the walls down right now, there's no reason to forgo a nice Cat5 wiring. Wire is cheap, you can put gigabit ethernet over it (vs. 11Mbps currently for wireless 802.11b), you can use a switch in the network closet instead of a shared topology, and you don't have to worry about your neighbors snooping your local traffic.

      You can always use wireless later on if you really want to (like for laptops). However, don't use that as an excuse for laziness right now.

    3. Re:Wireless by dgou · · Score: 1

      128 bit encryption and MAC security not withstanding.

    4. Re:Wireless by dr_apoc · · Score: 1

      yeah that way when you turn on the microwave your whole network goes down... nice :/

    5. Re:Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is every wireless comment posted moderated as "funny"? I don't find this comment funny, I find it insightful! And this is the third one I've seen so far!

    6. Re:Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently the moderators don't take it seriously...which is kind of odd, considering that wireless is the whole future of networking. there are just too many clueless IT people on this site that think they know what they're talking about [perhaps they should have gotten a CS or EE/CE degree instead?]

    7. Re:Wireless by BJH · · Score: 1

      MAC security doesn't mean shit - most NICs will let you change your MAC at will.

      WEP gives fairly good protection (especially in its 128bit form), but it's not perfect. Cracking it only requires around 1GB of data to go out over the air, and once it's cracked, it easy to get the key.

      Admittedly, if you have the sort of neighbor who can do that, then you've probably got other things to worry about, but still, it's better to not be overconfident.

    8. Re:Wireless by itachi · · Score: 1

      Actually, as people constantly forget, security in a repeated network is inherently lacking. Hence, wireless is insecure. MAC spoofing, sniffing, etc. Look at any wireless technology - there is a way to intercept the traffic, block the traffic, or fake the traffic. I don't want wireless to be part of MY networking future, and I doubt I'm alone...

      itachi

    9. Re:Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wireless was cheaper for me.

      The typical builder won't let you run your
      own wiring, you have to pay for their specific
      installation. Wiring in my new house was
      going to cost $2K total.

      I did my wireless for $500. It's more
      convienent, I don't care about security,
      and it leaves with me when I sell the house.

      In my case, it was an accident because
      I ended up cancelling the first house where
      I was charged an extra $2K, but I'm happy
      about it now.

    10. Re:Wireless by HangHigh · · Score: 1

      Have you actually used a wireless network? I'm running wireless in my house, and it doesn't go down when I'm using the microwave. With 50mbs around the corner, running cable is archaic.

  33. Cat5 and Coax by Robert+Hayden · · Score: 4, Informative

    You should run two drops of Cat5 and two drops of RG6 Coax to every "main" room you may have people. Run it to a central cross-connect in the basement or garage.

    The reason you want to run two coax drops is that if you get a dual-tuner sattelite decoder (like a DirectTV TiVo) you will need to lines going out to your dish or to your multiswitch (which splits the signal between >2 lines, so you can put receivers in multiple rooms).

    You could also run a Left/Right RCA audio system to each room, but audio will travel decently over Cat5, so you shouldn't have to worry about that.

    Fiber would be useful, but frankly you don't need it now because nothing we are doing iwll need fiber probably for 10 years. If you want to prep for it, you can run conduit (probably 1.5" would be sufficient) to each room, to make pulling new cables in (or pulling old cables out) easier in 5 or 10 years. Run it to a modular mounting jack so you can change stuff out if need be.

    Having just recently gotten my DirectTV TiVo (and hacked it to 146 hours of storage), I know my next house is gonna need twin coax to every main room. :-)

    1. Re:Cat5 and Coax by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      You should run two drops of Cat5 and two drops of RG6 Coax to every "main" room you may have people. Run it to a central cross-connect in the basement or garage.

      I've done exactly that in my house. I wasn't certain whether it would be too much or not enough, but so far, six months later, it seems to working out great.

      However, I've never been a big fan of distributed audio. It's so easy to lose signal strength in audio cables, that running them throughout the house sounds like a bad idea (pun intended). Designating one room of the house as a home theater, and running wires or conduit through the walls to where the speakers will go is much smarter.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Cat5 and Coax by tzanger · · Score: 2

      The reason you want to run two coax drops is that if you get a dual-tuner sattelite decoder (like a DirectTV TiVo) you will need to lines going out to your dish or to your multiswitch (which splits the signal between >2 lines, so you can put receivers in multiple rooms).

      Umm.. why not only run two pair from the dish (dual LNBF) to the control box?

      From what I understand of Digital Satellite, you have the even transponders on one frequency and the odd ones on another. Your receiver selects the frequency by sending a DC voltage to the LNBF, since they are essentially just Gunn diodes. If you want two receivers to watch two channels which are potentially on different transponders, you need two LNBFs, or a single dual so each can select the frequency.

      Now I've seen satellite control boxes which block the DC from all the receivers and "permanently" tune one LNBF to the odd transponders and the other LNBF to the even ones. Then it electronically connects the RF coming from the appropriate Gunnplexer to the receiver based on the voltage the reciever is sending. Large hotels and apartment buildings do this, IIRC.

      What I'd love to do if I could keep the signal quality is to have a receiver which decodes all the channels I'm entitled to simultaneously and then remodulate them on to regular CATV frequencies so I could watch satellite TV from any TV in my house without another $#%!^*ing receiver and card to deal with.

      Actually I think the ideal solution would be a cPCI backplane system which, at its core, was a satellite receiver/decoder/hard drive and any number of plug-in DSP/playback/remodulator/control units. The idea would be to plug your dual LNBF-dish into the thing and it would take care of your SINGLE card. The main unit has a large RAID array which takes the MPEG2 streams and directly saves them to HDD as requested by the control cards.

      Now, for each TV, you plug in a control/decode card which takes the commands from your remote for channel change/record/menu/etc.. Now you can watch any channel, record it (pause live tv), watch pre-recorded shows, etc.

      The backplane is only responsible for the connections and the system housekeeping. The control cards have the MPEG2 decoder and act as the cross-connect between the raw MPEG2 stream and the HDD (not physically, but logically) -- If you have an HDTV TV, you buy the HDTV control card with optical 5.1 audio and component video. cheap-ass 13" you bought for $5? Then you buy the cheap-ass RF modulator version of the control card.

      And of course, you can run other inputs and select/control them from any TV. DVD/Laserdisc, VCRs, broadcast TV, door-Cam...

      Damn... now where do I go to build this? I've got the engineering background, just not the connections into the DTV/satellite market. The last time I asked for specs on a satellite decoder chip I was told to go fuck myself in BusinessSpeak. Damn... I wonder if a Slashdot posting would count as Prior Art if someone tries to patent this and lock me out...

    3. Re:Cat5 and Coax by Vizzie · · Score: 1

      The key is the "dual tuner" part. The DirecTiVo boxes have 2 DTV tuners in them, so you can record 2 shows at a time. To enable that capability, though, you need to have a dual LNB and 2 coax runs (so that it can tune in even and odd transponders at the same time).

      Go with the conduit and string. You won't be able to anticipate every possible cable you might need, so prepare for any of them.

  34. Fiber backbone, maybe, but... by Party+Remover · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...do you really want to have to standardize on fiber adapters for all your devices?

    Besides, GigE over copper is here now. I've just purchased an old house that needs a lot of electrical work -- while the walls are open, I plan on running Cat 6 STP cabling to my drops.

    GigE might be the last gasp for copper. Then again, some were saying that about Fast Ethernet when that debuted.

    Trying to build in anticipation of what the standard will be in 2012 is an expensive crapshoot. Go with what works now (i.e. Cat 5e/6) and count on the size of the installed base to ensure continued support for it.

    1. Re:Fiber backbone, maybe, but... by Xi · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I did my house with two spools of 1000 feet of cat6something ($120) each spool (the standard wasn't nailed down but it looked rated to 1 gig) almost 2 years ago. With 2 seperate spools its easy to pull 2 drops to each place. They practically had cat7 stuff out which is capable of huge amounts of data. I mean I worked in a lab once and transferred data on a scsi system. I did one by copying the data from one scsi hard drive to the other in the same machine. I did another by copying over 100mbs cat5 between 2 similar machines. There was hardly any difference in copy time. What I'm saying is for a home network its fast as you need. Especially if you put a switch in your garage instead of a normal hub. Also I didn't use the phone drops. We just dropped down from the wall mounts, drilled through the floor and 2x4's into the crawl space under the house. Then ran the stuff through the punch out holes used for pipes and stuff in the beams under the floor and drilled up into the garage for the patch panel and put in a cute little 3 foot rack. for the patch panel and hub. Also I think you can get converters from cat cable to like coax for things like cable tv. You'll need 1 hefty drill, one pretty good sized bit, patch panel, cable, standard electrical boxes, faceplates, faceplate recepticals, patch panel, hub, my hub and patch panel were each 24 ports, some of my friends have wall mounted patch panels, I just chose the rack. Little velcro ties are nice for bundling cable, then you need like little cable anchors for under the house. And to top it all off, if that doesnt set you for life, think of 10-20 years from now. There will probably be some extremely fast wireless protocols going around. And since most houses haven't made the provisions you have they will use those. We did all the work in the evening between the electrical installation and the insulation. Good luck.

    2. Re:Fiber backbone, maybe, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Reality check:

      - Gigabit ethernet works by using all 4 twisted pairs in parallel at 250Mb/s.

      - 100Mb Ethernet runs on a single pair each way (possibly full duplex).

      I do a lot of microwave for a radiotelescope, there is no way copper can bring 10Gb/s on a significant distance on 8 wires. The biggest problem is increase of attenuation with frequencies, the second problem is that you would need much better cable uniformity to obtain an approximately constant characterictic impedance, the third problem is that the dicontinuities at connectors would also make the signal fidelity questionable, to put it mildly.

      There is a frequency at which twisted pair break, whatever you do. Like there is a frequency at which coax breaks (there is coax usable up to 110GHz, in which you lose half the power every foot or so: imagine what you get after 100 feet). Generally speaking the lowest loss, the lower the frequency limit for coax, because it is bigger (the biggest one I've seen in acatalog only are about 1 foot in diameter but break at about 600MHz). Note that you don't want to use the comparatively small 1/2" coax we use and stops working between 8 and 9 GHz: it's a copper pipe inside another copper pipe with some low density (full or air bubbles) dielectric in between, so you imagine the flexiblity (ok, it might handle 50Gb/s with proper encoding) and it's not cheap ($1/ft), and the loss at the highest frequency would be about 50 dB after 600ft.

      Optical also has its own problems, but it's not losses in the fiber.

  35. Conduits by Glytch · · Score: 2

    Shielded conduits would be more useful. More expensive now, but makes it dead simple to upgrade ten years from now.

    1. Re:Conduits by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Definitely! And if you can't afford them, just make sure that all electrical wires cross your phone lines and ethernet cables at 90 degree angles, if they are running parallel to each other at any point, it will cause serious problems.

      --
      What?
  36. Cost.... by jgrumbles · · Score: 1

    Looking at this page it seems to tell me that fiber is not very cheap. Albeit I couldn't tell you which exact type of cable you would be needing (ST/ST, SC/ST, SC/SC), none of em are affordable in a practical sense. I am sure the hardware for this stuff isn't nice on the bank account either. As far as what you want to do with this fiber I am not sure. Run it straight to the computers or end up converting it into rj45 ports in the wall or something and running cat5 from the computer to the walljack.

    1. Re:Cost.... by webmaestro · · Score: 2, Informative

      ST, SC etc. are not cable types, they are the connectors. Also, Belden Multi-Mode zipcord (2 fibers, one RX one TX) can be had for $.23 a foot, not exactly expensive.

      The page you were looking at had patch cables, which ARE expensive, not bulk cable, which you would be running in this case. The connectors are expensive $3-8 each, but who said that he needs to terminate the fiber right now? You can check out bulk fiber here (Multimode) and the connectors here (ST) and here (SC), for later on. He's probably going to want to put in MultiMode fiber instead of SingleMode, because its more common, the equipment and fiber is less expensive, and because he probably doesn't need to make runs that are longer than a KM.

      If he (or you) want(s) to read up on the subject he can check out the Fiber University Lesson Plan.

  37. Talk To the HVAC Guys by linuxbert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rather then running seperate conduite for cableing, use the cold air returns. talk to the HVAC (heating/vent/Air cond) and makesure that you have a main return running straight from the basement to the atic, and floor and celling returns in each room (good practice for ventilation anyway.) And you should have no problem running plenum rated cable (fibre, cat5e whatever) through them.

    as an asside, if you plan on having 1 room in the house with most of your equipment, add extra registers to get more Cooling in summer and dont forget about fans in the ducts to improve air circulation)

  38. As a certified electrician... by dfeldman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have pulled cable in several new construction projects and I have a few tips that will save you a lot of headaches in the future:
    • Run conduit. Big conduit. There's a lot of space between your walls so why not leave yourself the room you will need to expand later?
    • You can buy 25-pair (!) Cat5e cable. It costs about twice as much as 4-pair but it is well worth it for expansion reasons. There's not a whole lot you can't do with 25 pairs.
    • Don't forget to buy plenum wiring, which does not emit toxic fumes when it burns. It's probably code in your area. I have seen bean counting managers cheap out and buy generic cable, and get fined thou$ands of dollars for it.
    • Coax isn't a bad idea, especially in a residential installation. You never know when you will want cable/DSS in a room.
    • Run a string between any two points where it makes sense, and mark the strings so you know what you're pulling later.
    • Don't bother with fiber. It is overpriced and will remain so for quite a while. Copper is good enough for gigabit ethernet and will provide all the bandwidth you need (within one building at least) for a very long time to come.

    Good luck with the project!

    df
    1. Re:As a certified electrician... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Don't forget to buy plenum wiring, which does not emit toxic fumes when it burns. It's probably code in your area.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought plenum wiring was only required in airspaces. I though wiring enclosed in conduit did not have to be plenum-rated to meet code.

    2. Re:As a certified electrician... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yes! RUN 3/4" flex conduit or 3/4" EMT.

      Note - IF the attic or basement areas are open,
      you can just run conduit DOWN or UP the wall sections. (This way, you can easily change the
      network cabling later...)

      Personally, I prefer EMT (pain to install at times) for ease of pulling cable...


      $60 for CAT5! THAT MUST NOT be plenum!
      DON'T use NON-Plenum rated CAT5! Big
      firehazard issues!


      Also - when running your wires keep them AWAY
      from electrical devices, inc. ballasts for lights.... (remember the R^2 rule?)

    3. Re:As a certified electrician... by webmaestro · · Score: 1

      You may very well be right about the condiut part, but its very unlikely that he will be running the cable in conduit all the way back to his patch panel, wiring closet, or whatever.

    4. Re:As a certified electrician... by dgou · · Score: 4, Insightful
      My SO, a data wrangler from a local university says:

      Great list. Esp. marking the strings, you'll really want to know what is where.
      25 pair sounds cool, however it is a termination nightmare unless you're just going to use it specifically from point to point as your major house backbone and have it premade and preterminated for your situation. If you terminate it yourself you might be able to maintain 100Mb, but likely not and certainly not Gig. Unless there is a whole new 25 pair solution out there. Big conduit to run a plethora of different cables (except power of course) is a more general solution.

      I would also add that you want more than one outlet per room. Depending on your builder, it could be something that you'd have to octopus up (or down) from a central point, or you might be able to run in between the floor boards to get opposite wall coverage (or three or four wall coverage depending on your layout.

      One thing is for sure, there is never enough bandwidth, and you don't know what you'll want to run in the future.

      The house I bought was already built, and has pathetic insulation which is not easily fixed. I'm planning on moving the "server farm" and "main hub" between the attic (in winter) and somewhere lower in the house in summer.

      Consider also that where-ever you've picked for your central hub might become ideal for something else (kid's attic room, enclosed hot tub in basement, whatever), and since its so easy now, I would be inclined to run the conduit so you could have two (or maybe three, depending on the structure of your house) alternative spots.

      It might also be cool to run a room or three with a few extra outlets for gaming/multimedia/"record"-making/"movie"-making parties, efforts, etc. (I'm thinking of "Duality" ((Lost the URL, darn!)).

    5. Re:As a certified electrician... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >DON'T use NON-Plenum rated CAT5! Big
      firehazard issues!

      Unless your house is made of wood...

    6. Re:As a certified electrician... by fallen1 · · Score: 1
      The URL you are trying to remember is www.crewoftwo.com. Created the Star Wars genre movie all on Macs over the course of a year. Even got a nod of recognition from Lucas.

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    7. Re:As a certified electrician... by Placido · · Score: 1

      Run conduit. Big conduit.

      OK but don't forget to make it small enough so that hero's can't crawl around your Evil Lair and rescue that damsel in distress.

      Hey, it's number 2 in the manual!

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  39. Wireless is to secure networking... by ColGraff · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...as running through the street naked singing "I'm a little teapot, short and stout" is to modesty and sanity.

    No offense, but even the best wireless security solution can't compare to having an actual cat5 cable you can control access to.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:Wireless is to secure networking... by HangHigh · · Score: 1

      Yea, maybe if you happen to be living next door to another geek who's both sophisticated and motivated enough to hang out on your network. Not very lucky. And if you're that paranoid, just turn off WEP and run a VPN.

  40. If I'm not mistaken... by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

    You really should consider plentium grade Cat-5 cable if you're going to put it inside walls and throught he ceiling. My understanding is that this is a fire safety issue, this type of wire does not emit toxic fumes when it burns. I know that it is required for commercial installs, maybe home installs are different. Whatever the case, it will probably cost a LOT more than $60 / 1000 feet.

    --
    Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
    1. Re:If I'm not mistaken... by johnslater · · Score: 1


      FWIW, Home Depot has regular 5e for $57/1000ft,
      and plenum 5e for $155/1000ft.

    2. Re:If I'm not mistaken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer Aphlon grade cat5 myself. It costs a little less than Plentium and you can get 110mbps out of it!

  41. Don't run wires... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    802.11 and bluetooth will you best bet, don't waste time and $ with wires.

  42. Run Cat 5 but... by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 3, Informative

    don't secure the wire to the studs in the wall. That way whenever fiber is more prevalent, you can use the Cat5 to pull the fiber down into the wall from the attic.

    Pull the Cat 5 to a central place down inside your house - locate your router/hub there - maybe even your home server.

    Think about providing excellent grounding and maybe even heatsink capability to your server closet. Run a separate breakered power to the server closet.

    Run coaxial cable for TV - double shielded - to each room and have it go either to the attic for split or better yet have them terminate at the power mast outside the house - leave plenty of extra cable.

    Wire your house for security prior to putting in the insulation - insulation and sheetrock guys just love to cut wires that are in their way. :/

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  43. Am I allowed to run cables myself? by theBunkinator · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna run into the same situation in a few month. However, we're not building the house ourselves, but rather purchased a new construction to be completed in spring - so while this will be "our house", we don't really own it until settlement, after construction is completed. I've already talked to people that run the alarm package and offer the "onQ" home wiring solution, but they are such morons ("We'll give you a state-of-the-art 10-baseT hub") that I wouldn't trust them to run a phone line. Besides, they are way too expensive.

    So my question is, at which point can I legally and pratically get into the house and run my own cables? And who do I have to tell? Is it enough to bribe the electrician with a case of beer? Or do I have to get this whole thing approved by the builder? Does the builder have to let me into the house at all, or can they insist that I use their security contractor for the wiring?

    This will all be low-voltage wiring, so I don't think I have to be a certified electrician, right? But I'd like to get CAT5e, coax, audio, and possibly fiber (what kind?) into most of the rooms, concentrated in the basement. Also, I'd like to have this connected neatly in the rooms, via phone jack type of in-the-wall boxes. But then I have to get the people putting the dry walls in to make the appropriate cut-outs, complicating things some more.

    OK, just one more: How about any type of outside wiring, e.g. inductive loop under driveway; low-vol line to mailbox; cable, audio & power to the back yard?

    1. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by BrodyVess · · Score: 1

      Can you run them? Sure. In your situation it might be "iffy" since you dont have a hard and fast contract until after the house is built and approved. You will probably need to talk to the contractor and make sure that you can do work on it before you offically own it. You could probably get by with just bribing the electrician, but it could be a pain in the ass if the contractor found out and took issue with it. Cat5e, coax, tele, rca, anything like that is all low voltage wiring. In-wall boxes are not needed. I was doing Cat5 wiring in my High School when I was 16 without any kind of certification. Unless you have a specific need (ethernet a mile away in your barn) I wouldn't mess with fiber. Cat5e already does gigabit, and since there is such a huge cat5 infrastructure in place it only behoves researchers to continue find a way to squeeze just a little bit more out of it.

      --
      No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
    2. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by isorox · · Score: 2

      At least in the UK, you dont have to be an electrition to wire anything you'll find in the home.

      I'd wait until you get the keys before putting in wiring though - perhaps ask the builders to put in a nice big cable duct system.

    3. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm about to run into the same situation. My house just got done with framing, and I'd love to run some wires after the electrician comes in. I KNOW it says somewhere in my contract that I can't do that, but I'd thought about trying to buddy up with the contractors. The schmoozing begins this week with a dozen Krispy Kreme doughnuts.
      I think it sucks that I can't do anything with my future house, but that's how a lot of these big development builders keep things streamlined. At the very least, I may sneak in after the insulation is up and hide some strings behind it.

    4. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by LordNimon · · Score: 2
      So my question is, at which point can I legally and pratically get into the house and run my own cables?

      Generally, not until after you close on the house, at which point it will be too late. If you really want to wire it yourself, you're going to have to sneak in. And if you have an OnQ system, like I do, then it really won't work, because the installer will be responsible for all the wiring, and he'll notice. Plus, who's going to install the jacks? Sooner or later, someone will catch you, and then you'll be in trouble.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    5. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure about the legalities of running wire in the house when you technically don't own it. However, a friend of mine purchased a new house last year. We wired up cat5 and coax. Then in the basement, we used some conduit for a couple places for future expansion (I'd recomend the same). He was in the same situation you are. He didn't technically own the home while it was being built.
      If it is just data cables (CATV, ethernet, etc...), you can lay it all day long and you don't need to be an electrician or have a permit (no permit at least in his area); To wire power, you need to have a permit, but no license. Maybe for some high-voltage you need to be licensed, I don't know. The only thing is this. You can basically wire what you want for YOUR own home. If you have a friend help, he/she needs to be licensed. Whether or not you care about that part is up to you. :)

    6. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by hattig · · Score: 1
      Buddying up to the builders and installers before completion is always a good idea. Some beer, doughnuts, beer, etc will always ensure that your house is built better than the neighbours. If you give them the beer at the *end* of the day, that is.

      Can you ship me some krispy kreme doughnuts - we don' have them in the UK. We are lucky to get vanilla custard flavour from tesco.

      Just rip the skirting board off and replace it with plasti-skirt - plastic skirting board with built-in conduit (not large, obviously, but fine for most things except fiber) available house-wide. I don't have any link available right now after a bottle of wine and a customer who doesn't understand that reverse DNS PTR records should point at the hostname of the machine allocated the IP address, and not the netblock owner domain name... ARGHGAHGRG!

      What are lofts for but for running extra wires and cables (apart from building a new room when you accidentally have one child too many - darn that rhythm method - there is a term for people who use the rhythm method - "parents").

      Eek, that wine has got to my head. I just don't drink enough. Make sure my spelling and grammar are correct otherwise GrammarNazi will catch me...

    7. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I faced this same issue with my house. I opted to sneak in before the dry wall went up and the builder didn't even notice.

      However, my brother who is an electrician once saw a builder get pissed off at the home buyer and cut the wires before the walls went up.

    8. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sneak in at night and run the cable before the drywall goes up.. seriously.

  44. Is it allowed? by hruzaden · · Score: 1

    Are you allowed to work on or modify the house before it's completed? It seems most home builders will not allow you to work on the home during the construction. This is for insurance/liability reasons and others. I don't know if this only applies to only building/trim type stuff.

    Have you checked with your home builder yet?

    Den

    1. Re:Is it allowed? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      If his home builder won't let him run network cable, then he's got the wrong home builder.

    2. Re:Is it allowed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you paying them to build the house to your specs, they'll shut up and let you do whatever you want. period.

  45. Re:Ducts - Air Handling Space by TheDancer · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're gonna put it in ducts--even in a single dwelling residential--check your local codes. They may require you to use plenum. Most business codes (and either the NEC or the TIA/EIA-568-A can't remember which one) requires that for offices cable installed in ducts must be plenum rated and installed in conduit inside the ducts.

    The danger is non-plenum cable gives off a lot of smoke while burning, if the cable is in the ducts this can quickly spread the smoke to areas that aren't on fire and hinder peoples escape from the building.

    Fire codes are basically designed to do two things, 1) slow down the spread of a fire 2) make it easy for people to escape. And if you can't see, you can't get out (so the theory goes), that's why plenum is sometimes required. (plus non-plenum burning vapours tend to create a strong acid when mixed with water, iirc).

    Long and short, always check your codes.

    Bryan

  46. Technology by janolder · · Score: 1

    Cat5e will "only" get you up to 1000baseT. For 10000baseT you need Cat7 aka class F. Sadly, I didn't find a real price comparison of copper and fiber but I did find this quote: "Class F will probably cost twice as much as Cat 5-an even higher price than fiber cable!" here. Makes me think the fiber itself will be cheap to put in, but the price tag to be able to use it might make you gag later. :-)

  47. Upgradability - conduits by standards · · Score: 2

    It's hard to predict what you'll want to run between your walls in the future. Technology changes every few years - but house ownership can last for decades.

    The key is to install conduit between key locations in your house. It usually isn't that hard to run cables between the basement and the first floor, or from the attic to the second floor. But it can be a big effort to run a wire from the basement to the 2nd floor. Or to get a cable to a location where it isn't accessible from the attic or the basement.

    When I had my house built, I installed a conduit from the wiring panel in the basement all the way up to the attic, with access points on the first and second floors. I also installed a conduit behind two bedroom walls on the second floor - walls which are diffcult to get behind without a lot of demolition.

    Now if I want to bring in a new fiber or CATV or doorbell, it's very easy to draw the cable from the basement to the attic, and it's easy to cleanly distribute the cable to any room in the house.

    My only mistake was a lack of a conduit between my house and detached garage.

  48. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by Maktoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Oh, I just thought of something.

    It will be a little more expensive, but you might want to think about stringing "STP" CAT5, instead of UTP... that's Shielded Twisted Pair instead of Unshielded.

    STP is what is plenum graded, so that it doesn't catch fire as easily. Also, it's better shielded against interference from other electrical sources that might be in the wall.

    It's not a requirement or anything... but it might be worth considering simply for safety reasons.

  49. I just did this... by pherret · · Score: 3, Informative

    My father was building his new house and wanted it "wired for the future". My brother and I were to develop his idea and install it (after the electrician and before the drywall).

    We decided that is wasn't practical to run fiber. How much speed to really think you will need? How much faster can a home user get? Even if the broadband ISPs upgrade their system to allow anything faster than a maximum of 10mbps...are you _REALLY_ going to need that?

    If you are concerned about the speed in your home area network, then just make sure your network equipment is 100meg...that should be more than plenty for every person in those six rooms to be swapping high-quality multimedia back and forth.

    The point is, fiber really isn't for the home user...it's more for other intensive bandwidth situations. What I can definately recommend is that if you can afford it and it won't break your budget...then by all means go for it!

    However, if it _will_ break your budget, or you want to spend that money on a bunch of X-10 equipment for a semi-Jetson-type house, then run conduit and pull strings. So if you ever get the cash or get the itch to install fiber, all you gotta do is attach it to a pull string and go...it will slide nicely through conduit.

    As for the phone and other stuff...just run Cat-5 all the way through. You can use it for phone and sound (maybe other things). If you want video, just run a coax to each room and get a fancy distribution panel to manage all this neat stuff. I wouldn't recommend running S-Video throughout. Have you ever bought a 6-foot s-video cable? They are expensive. Coax does its job just fine. Make sure you run the high quality stuff.

    Of course, if you run fiber you can pipe it all through the same wire, but each room will need an EXPENSIVE thingy to split all signals to the designated device.

    1. Re:I just did this... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      However, if it _will_ break your budget, or you want to spend that money on a bunch of X-10 equipment for a semi-Jetson-type house, then run conduit and pull strings.

      I like X-10 and all, but its not a serious home control system. If you want to be cool then wire up a control mechanism where commands run on separate lines and directly into a centralized controlling system. Gone are the lame delays, jamming and false commands from powerline noise (which any tech person should have plenty of), overadvanced socket-end bits, etc.

      Just because I can have a star lamp in my living room that turns on by itsself at night and a remote that can buzz me in the front door doesn't make X-10 an invunerable one-size fits all juggernaut of home automation.

      Go hardwired automation if you're serious about it.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:I just did this... by BIGJIMSLATE · · Score: 2

      "Even if the broadband ISPs upgrade their system to allow anything faster than a maximum of 10mbps...are you _REALLY_ going to need that?"

      EXACTLY! You my friend, are just as good as predicting the future as my friend Bill Gates, who told me that I will never need more than 640k of ram...

    3. Re:I just did this... by Porag_Spliffing · · Score: 1
      My father was building his new house and wanted it "wired for the future". My brother and I were to develop his idea and install it (after the electrician and before the drywall).


      I considered installing an electrician once as well. Did you put him behind the dry wall and how did you overcome the stink issue ? Are you in a dry mumification friendly climate perhaps ;-)
      --
      Maybe you live in interesting times
  50. Problem with Fiber (almost forgot this) by thebigbadme · · Score: 1

    Be concerned about places where the fiber woul;d have to take a bend (elbow).... the curve will upset the full potenial of bandwidth that can be carried over the fiber (light likes to travel in straight lines). The way that a signle gets around bend in fiber is that the light-beams refract/reflect (i can't remember, i'm dumb) off the sides of the cabling repeatedly until they can get back to what they like. this added latency will have only a minor draw on what it can fully hold, but it will none-the-less have an effect.

    --
    "It's the Law of the Universe, and I'm the sheriff." Slash-cott 2/10-2/17
    1. Re:Problem with Fiber (almost forgot this) by uberdave · · Score: 4, Informative

      That kind of signal loss is going to be insignificant. The real problem with bending fiber around corners, is that the strands are somewhat fragile. I've seen runs of fiber that had to be doubled because some of fibers the first one had broken when the cable was bent too sharply. The best thing with fiber is conduit, because it gives smooth rounded corners.

    2. Re:Problem with Fiber (almost forgot this) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Again provided the corners are smooth.The manufacturer suggests a min bend radius.That should ultimately be your guide.
      But again fiber is best left alone for now.
      Technology changes all the time.Yes there is fiber but what kind ?this is why conduits are ok in my book.Place conduiting for future upgrades .
      wait till you know what you need.The conduits being there ,it's easy to add .Specially if you add a pulling string when you install the conduit
      but then you can. elect to install cat5 under conduit in the first place and have a junction boxes where all the piping joins.Conduit in a house makes sense.. specially in our multimedia days.Solves many problems.

    3. Re:Problem with Fiber (almost forgot this) by creepy_chris · · Score: 0

      you are talking about Multi-mode fiber. Single Mode fiber has a smaller piece of glass that doesn't allow the light to reflect, the beam just goes straight through without bouncing which, as was stated before will only effect latency. And as long as your house isn't 1500 meters from hub to station, then you should be ok.

  51. Run conduit by EQ · · Score: 1

    Basically, get some PVC code-approved conduti big enough to hold some RG6 coax (for the cable TV), puls a coupel strands at the end of cat5e and leave extra room to pull anything else.

    Thisd way, when/if fiber becomes pratical, you just pull the old cat5 out, and using a pull-lead pull new "fiber" in. Nearther to the main runs and the junction/swithc, you change to a larger pipe/conduit, to hold more cables. Also, if you use PVC, it waterproofs against any potential water exposure (borken pipe, kid overflowing the tub and leaking intot he wall, etc).

    Think about it - no ugly (exposed) wires/cables along the baseboard like with an external install, and you can upgrade easily and selectively with the latest and greatest medium without having to tear up your walls.

    --
    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
  52. dunno about fiber but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went through this with a friend recently.
    Never mind upgrading problems, think about just moving your desk.
    He wanted to run that stuff with RCA/coax/cat 5 together.
    That means long cords and everything in one spot.

    PLAN WHERE THE FURNITURE WILL BE.
    He wanted to go wireless. I don't have 802.11b but I can't even talk on my 2.4Ghz phone while using the microwave. HE RAN CAT5E.

    Cable is what, max 4mbps? Unless you are streaming something fat, gigabit will be fine for a long time.
    By then, real wireless should work.

  53. House Wiring by oldzoot · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wired my own house a few years ago.

    Here is some advice based on what I did. Note that I was at the time a licensed communications wiring contractor, so the house is wired a litte more than perhaps is usefull, but here goes.

    1. Put muliple locations in each room. I put to faceplates in each bedroom, typically near a corner and opposite each other ( diagaonally opposite corners ) a cable from the outlet can be run along either adjacent wall for convienience in locating phones or computers. In each outlet are two cat 5 data cables and 1 4pair telephone cable. In one of the two outlets is an RG6 CATV cable.

    2. Home run telephone wires - I ran all the telephone cables directly from the outlet to a telephone junction box in the garage which was mounted directly above the one from the phone company. The phone company box faces outside, mine faces inside and there are some holes in the 2X4 seperating them for cables to run through. I mounte 4 type 66 punchblocks in the inside box and terminated all 32 cables there. All multiple jumpering etc. is done in that box.

    I ran all the data wiring ( 48 cables ) to 4 dual gang boxes inside the master bedroom closet. Using ortronics IMO2 dual gang faceplates with 6 double port modules, I got 48 ports in the 4 outlets and its is not cludgy like a patchpanel on a swingout door would be- it has a finished look. I also got the electrician to put a utility outlet inside the closet close to the ports to power the switch and localtalk bridge.

    3. Put a telephone outlet near your CATV outlets - if you want to use satellite tv or some other service which requires a telephone connection it will be very good to have.

    4. Put data outlets in common rooms - the livingroom, dining room den etc. These areas could end up as common homework computer areas for the kids. I have a table in the living room and one in the dining room ( we eat in the kitchen ) with some older computers on them that the kids use for homework.

    Note that the contractors installers may be very helpful if you offer a 6 pack or two of beer to help grease the skids. I got all kinds of built-in bookshelves, nooks and other cool customizations this way.

    Another suggestion !! Put in the return line for a circulating hot-water system during construction. If you can not afford the pump now, you can add it later, but it is a pain to put the return line in.

    Also consider insulating hot water lines and putting insulation inside the inner walls to give some soundproofing.

    Good Luck

    Zoot

    --
    enough is too much
    1. Re:House Wiring by arjennienhuis · · Score: 1

      I think there is "a circulating hot-water system" in my parents house. The floor in the bathrooms are always hot and the cold water tap gives warm water for about 5 minutes.

    2. Re:House Wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >3. Put a telephone outlet near your CATV outlets - if you want to use satellite tv or some other service which requires a telephone connection it will be very good to have.

      Also very handy for an emulator system when you're tired of paying for TV.

      No, it isn't illegal where I live. Yes, I still feel like a moral person. My high level of tolerance for schadenfreude prevents that. :)

    3. Re:House Wiring by ottffssent · · Score: 1

      66 blocks? You poor man!

    4. Re:House Wiring by oliverk · · Score: 1
      Put data outlets in common rooms - the livingroom, dining room den etc. These areas could end up as common homework computer areas for the kids.

      I'm building my own home, too, and have been thinking about a wireless solution for networking (a la Apple's Airport) -- with the exact concern that you listed. Do you think this is a workable solution, or is the technology just not there yet?

      --
      ---- Please be nice in case my Slashdot karma ~= my real life karma.
  54. Innerduct by Leebert · · Score: 1

    Want futureproofing? Run innerduct to each of the locations. In the future, you can pull whatever you see fit to the location, should you choose to do so.

  55. Fiber? It'll cut into your crack budget by puzzled · · Score: 1

    Any monkey with a side cutter, a crimpmaster rj45 crimp tool, and maybe a type 110 punchdown tool can do a wonderful job of wiring a house - two cat 5 in every room, a nice ortronics patch panel in the basement, and whatever layer 2 switch you decide to run.

    If you decide to use fiber you need expensive termination tooks, expensive cable, an expensive fiber access panel, expensive fiber to UTP ethernet converters, and a crazy expensive switch with fiber or a UTP switch with a media converter shelf. The only reason anyone installs fiber these days is a need for gigabit ethernet or ethernet runs that are vastly over distance for copper.

    "But fiber is faster!"

    So fsckin' what. Do you really have a *need* to move data faster than 12 mega*bytes* per second?

    10/100 ethernet is going to be around a long, long time. I mean a really long time. Its like that plain ol' pots like - once things got to where they were useable (circa 1940) not much changed.

    I'm pretty sure I am in the upper 1% of wage earners and I have a side business selling used communications gear. I have all the skills necessary to do what the article's author described. I work at home and there is a heavy design & prototype component to my job so I have lots of stuff that needs to be connected.

    My elite home network contains ... a Cisco 2621 router with a Catalyst 1924 switch. The 2621 handles ISDN and NAT to my cable modem, one of the two 100 mbit portson the Catalyst is used for vlan trunking, the other is reserved as a sniffer port.

    You heard right folks - all the knowledge, a lot of the stuff around, and nothing here *needs* to go faster than 10 mbits.

    Sorry to burst your bubble but, dear article author, you're caught in analysis paralysis - stop agonizing and get the lines in before the drywall guys come along and seal them.

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
    1. Re:Fiber? It'll cut into your crack budget by Karma+50 · · Score: 1

      What about HDTV?

      In ten years time will 10Mbps be enough?

      They're experimenting now with 40 and 270Mbps HDTV feeds.

      --
      http://www.thehungersite.com
    2. Re:Fiber? It'll cut into your crack budget by Gihadrah · · Score: 1

      When I do development (at home) I prefer to keep the source on the server (that has redundant disks). Compiling across 10 BaseT is not quite as nice as 100 BaseT. This requirement would even be MORE so for someone who is moving / editing large video files from one machine to another.

      You assume that the only path needed is out to the world. Hardly the case. I want a server AWAY from my desk so I don't have to listen to it, and I want a full-duplex Fast Ethernet connection between the machine I am on and that server.

      Although, I do agree that fiber is overkill (now). That's why the conduit would be preferable.

      Your comparison of Ethernet to POTs lines is WRONG. If we were using 1940's POTS lines now you would never get DSL or 56k which require technology SIGNIFICANTLY upgraded from what was put in in the 40's.

      BTW, Congratulations on making the cut to the "upper 1% of wage earners" - I am sure that your mother is proud.

    3. Re:Fiber? It'll cut into your crack budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of fiber should you use?
      Multimode?
      Singlemode?

      What kind of connectors should you use?
      SC, MT-RJ, mu etc. etc.

      Fiber is not standardised such as TP so you end up with a lot of choices and some practical problems:

      1. You can not connected the connectors to the fiber (requires upto three days training)
      2. You can not check your connections (requires equipment worth >$1000 )
      3. You want to be future proof and use singlemode, can you afford ~$500 for every port?

      /Anders Hedberg

    4. Re:Fiber? It'll cut into your crack budget by slashdoter · · Score: 1

      Thats what I thought when I bought my NIC's you try backing up one comptuer to another over 10mbits. For a couple of more dollors I could have been done in half the time. IF you want to simply share an internet connection then 10 will do fine, but you never plan for the simplest solution. Drop the extra money and get 100 atleast 1 gig is better.

      --
      Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
    5. Re:Fiber? It'll cut into your crack budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you get *12* megabytes per second over 100Mbps, friend?

      You do not seem to realize that it's serial communication, *10* bits per byte, not 8!! There's a start bit and a stop bit in there too!

      That makes it only 10 megabytes per second. Remember your roots. Unless you're just a poser.

    6. Re:Fiber? It'll cut into your crack budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's right. Just remember to put an electrical outlet wherever your cat 5 terminates. You'll need it for your switch/hub/router.

    7. Re:Fiber? It'll cut into your crack budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like there are as many opinions on this as media types. Been doing upgrades on systems for a while now. I would go to the local home center and buy a truck load of flexible plastic conduit (you know the blue stuff that looks like vacuum hose. 3/4 inch should do it.) Any way run the stuff to every where you need a drop. long sweeping turns. pull in the cat 5e wire and wait for the fiber technology to catch up. When the day arrives, pull the new fiber and rejoice you had the insight to put in conduit!

    8. Re:Fiber? It'll cut into your crack budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do ANY file copying over your home network, anything less than 100Mbit will be a huge disappointment. Gigabit may indeed be "overkill" for most uses, but 10Mbit is definitely "underkill". Since it costs zero to go from 10MBit to 100Mbit, there's really no decision to make.

  56. To fiber or not to fiber.. by vinn · · Score: 1


    Just a couple of random thoughts:

    • After the electrician has run the phone, see if you can use that as a pull line for your cat5. I'd actually try to make the electrician run cat5e, it's pretty much the standard now for voice too. If he won't, just use his the cat3 or whatever he pulls to pull your runs. Then I'd consider doing 3 runs instead of two, that way you can use one for voice lines.
    • Might you want to run co-ax to every room too? I find that's pretty useful to have.
    • Perhaps speaker cable too?
    • What kind of terminations are you going to do? That's always an interesting question. I'd just get some quad modular plates and do one insert for phone, one for data, and leave the other two with blank knockouts for future use. Personally I love Krone products, but they're a hell of a lot more expensive than normal 110
      jacks/patch panels.
    • Electricians and building contractors differ wildly in how they'll run the cable. If there's conduit in the wall going to jam boxes make sure you pull some jet line (or other thin string) through the conduit when you make your runs. Later it'll be a snap to pull in the fiber. Even if you pull the fiber now you'll probably want to not terminate it (unless you're capable of doing it yourself.) And also for cost you'll want to weigh the advantages/disadvantages of multimode vs singlemode.


      If there's no conduit, perhaps they've just drilled holes in the studs and ran it through, I'd suggest getting some thin flexible smurf tube to lay in. It'll be a lot more work, but the advantage is you'll have a pathway through which you can later add more cable.

      My suggestion would be to not lay in fiber now, but have a method for easily adding it later.


    I work for a company that operates some large hotel operations. In the past year we've opened approximately 6 major buildings comprised of 400+ units. We custom designed a composite cable that has 2 strands of multimode, 2 co-ax, and 2 cat5e. We had our contractors lay about 6 of those cables in each unit (1 - 3 bedrooms + kitchen, etc) plus a feed back to riser closets. A few years ago we thought it would be overkill, now we're wondering if we should have included more.

    --
    ----- obSig
    1. Re:To fiber or not to fiber.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If he won't, just use his the cat3 or whatever he pulls to pull your runs.

      Unless there's a code issue of some kind, I'd sure as hell hate to pay for cat3 just to use them as pull lines.

  57. CAT-7 by robertchin · · Score: 2

    I don't see anyone that's mentioned it yet, but you should probably run CAT-7 for gigabit ethernet speeds. I agree that most gigabit ethernet equipment is expensive at the moment, but prices will no doubt fall soon (New G4 macs come with gigabit ethernet, including the G4 Powerbook (!) ). Gigabit ethernet is the future as far as home use. Fiber is a pain, CAT-7 is a copper wire so you should be able to make your own connectors. I'm not sure what the price point currently is on CAT-7.

    1. Re:CAT-7 by nutbar · · Score: 1

      I thought CAT7 was still in the lab, and CAT6 was damn pricey?

    2. Re:CAT-7 by robertchin · · Score: 2

      One CAT-7 patch cable supplier, conforms to the CAT-7 proposal. Perhaps the proposal is finalized, but you can buy cable conforming to the proposal. This way you're guaranteed expandability. Price is always a factor when trying to stay on the cutting edge =)

    3. Re:CAT-7 by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      There's little point in running gigabit ethernet throughout the house if your connection to the outside world is only 1 Mbit/sec. Considering how many DSL and cable modem companies have failed this year, we are a lot further away from gigabit Internet speeds than we were a year ago. Chances are, you'll move out of the house before cat5 cabling becomes obsolete.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:CAT-7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's little point in running gigabit ethernet throughout the house if your connection to the outside world is only 1 Mbit/sec.

      That is just plain wrong. There's more to networking than the Internet.

    5. Re:CAT-7 by Regolith · · Score: 1

      Who cares what your outside connection is? The extra available internal bandwidth is always valuable. If you do anything with audio or video production or have ever needed to shuffle large files (anything larger than 10-20 megs) between multiple computers in your home, there is no reason not to get the higher capacity cable. Plus, what are you going to do when the next breakthrough in connectivity happens and you are still stuck with a 100 M/bit ceiling?

      --

      Bow before my sig, for it is good.
    6. Re:CAT-7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy you replied to was just dense. Take no notice of him. I fanyone is taking the time to lay down wire today, CAT-5 is minimum and CAT-5e is highly recommended. And if you have the little extra necessary, do go for the CAT-6. You will thank yourself when you are not laying down new wire 10 years from now. Also, at least two RG-6 coax runs per room is mandatory. JMHO, but that guy was nuts.

    7. Re:CAT-7 by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      Who cares what your outside connection is? The extra available internal bandwidth is always valuable.

      Valueable? Yes. But is it usually worth the money? I say no. I guess we just disagree.

      Plus, what are you going to do when the next breakthrough in connectivity happens and you are still stuck with a 100 M/bit ceiling?

      I think I already answered that question. I don't think the next major breakthrough is going to happen for many, many years. And even then, it won't really matter. I have cat5 throughout the house, but all my computers run at 10baseT, because replacing all my network cards isn't worth it. I'd almost never notice the difference.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  58. Open pipes.... by PSL · · Score: 1

    My father-in law recently put a addition on his house and in each room of the addition on each wall he ran flexible plastic tubes and a junction box to underneath his house. Now if any new technology comes out that he needs to wire for he can just slide the wires in the tubes and the drop out in the basement. Fiber is expensive but one day may be common place now he can upgrade easily for anything.

    --

    "Times may change, but standards must remain the same." - George Carlin.
  59. I did this at my house. by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy to email you some pictures.

    One thing you need to for sure is run conduit. Now, I'll be the first to tell you, I spent a LOT of money on wiring my house. But the conduit has saved my butt on several occasions. Especially when running a new cable to an outside wall of the house where the insulation is. Without conduit, its a real pain!

    I decided to use the closet under my staircase as a wiring closet. All of the cat 5, fiber, RG-6, and telco comes into that closet. I have a 19" wall mount rack where I put my patch panels, DSL modem and switches (all rack mount).

    All in all I spent about $6K wiring my house. But the funny part is that when I put in 802.11b wireless about 8 months ago, I hardly ever use any of the cables I put all over the house. Most of them were for my notebook and IPAQ. But now I just use the wireless NIC. It's just so much simpler.

    Just remember... conduit is your friend.

    Mike

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  60. Free as aether by fm6 · · Score: 2
    I like wireless, but I wouldn't use it if there's an affordable and convenient alternative. Why deal with the extra cost and security hassles if you don't need to?

    And wireless only gives you 11 megabits, as opposed to 100 megabits for wired ethernet. And that assumes there are no neighbors emiting local packets for you to collide with.

    It's curious that everybody assumes that, except for the cost of the transceivers, that wireless bandwith is free and unlimited. There's only so much radio spectrum to go around, and we're already running short, even without 3G cells and ubiquitous community nets.

  61. You left out one point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be *very* careful in choosing a good electrician. I too had a "bean counting manager" who hired a really cheap ($25/hour) contractor and we later discovered that many of our outlets were miswired, some with floating grounds and some with switched hot and neutral connections - can you say "electrocution hazard"? My recommendation is to find a non-union (e.g. "non-surly" and "non-lazy") contractor with a proven track record to work on the place where your family will be living for many years.

    1. Re:You left out one point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My recommendation is to find a non-union (e.g. "non-surly" and "non-lazy") contractor

      As a proud member of Local 784 of the IBEW, I take personal offense at your slur. Oh, and some guys are coming over.

  62. wireless = cheaper? what? by rootofevil · · Score: 1

    how do you figure cheaper?

    wireless access point > 100$
    "nics" - ~100$

    vs

    8 port switch ~60$
    nics 10-20$ (or, since all the computers you have already have them, free)
    cable 1000' = 60$
    50 rj45 heads = 12$
    crimper = 12$

    --
    turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  63. Don't waste the money on fiber by Jennifer+Ever · · Score: 1

    Just create some cable raceways and run Cat5 for now. Use STP if you have interference issues. Fiber isn't worth the cost or the hassle right now, and in 10 years wireless technologies will probably be the way to go anyway.

  64. Cat 5 is unnecessary, go WiFi in most rooms by nomadicGeek · · Score: 1

    I ran Cat 5 to every room of my house when I built it 3 years ago. Since then WiFi has gotten really cheap. I now find myself using my 802.11 card in my laptop most of the time.

    I still use Cat 5 in my office and my wife's office but when roaming the house the WiFi is greater.

    Remember that the cable is cheap but the faceplates in every room and the patch panel will add up quickly. You can go wireless more cheaply.

    Also, I would run big fat conduit to the rooms that you will have your TV/stereo, computers, etc. It will make it easier to upgrade to newer technologies in the future.

  65. My experiences in wiring a new house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    I recently wired a new house. Here's my experiences with it.

    I wired the house with cable and two CAT5e cables to each telephone housing, plus security and some audio cabling to a few select areas. I also set up the internal vacuum system.

    Do Not, I repeat, DO NOT wire anything before the electrician has wired for power. Plan with the electrician so that you can make sure your wire is at least 1 foot, preferably 2 feet away from his wire when running in parallel, and otherwise crosses at oblique (near to 90 degrees) angles. Master electricians are smart, but the workers they employ are morons. We had to yank out a lot of wiring because the electricians laid power cable in all sorts of unfortunate places right next to ours. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

    Do nail in wire protector plates onto wood just like your electrician does for the power cables. They're to keep the drywallers from wrecking your wiring with their drywall nails.

    Do consider running a little conduit, but only a little. Don't conduit the whole thing: what we wound up doing was running conduit from the basement up to the attic. The house is two-story. That way if we absolutely had to, we could wire things in the future without massive rebuilding.

    Do run everything (phone, cable, network, fiber) in a star configuration to a central hub.

    Do do both the telephone and networking and cable yourself. It's simple. Don't pay the electrician to wire for telephone if you're going to wire for networking; you're just wasting money.

    Do Not use plenum, braided, or shielded CAT5e cable. Plenum cable has basically one use: to be run through air ducts in old office buildings as a fire precaution. Shielded CAT5e will turn your network into an antenna if not properly grounded. In general, you don't need it unless you're running along with lots of electrical lines in close conduit areas. Braided cable is only for patch-cord use.

    Do consider the new combination cable available, which has fiber, cable, CAT5e, low-power DC, and audio all in one bundle. But it's a pain to wire because it has to be bent at very gradual angles. Might be a good way to go though, and cheaper.

    Do not expect that security is wired in a similar fashion. In particular, 4-wire smoke detectors cannot be wired in a star configuration at all: they must be wired in a specific, unusual serial topology.

    Do remember that your hub must be in a locked area.

    1. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Salamander · · Score: 1, Troll
      Do Not use plenum, braided, or shielded CAT5e cable

      On the contrary, do use plenum cable. Fire-safety precautions are just as important in your home as in your office and, as another poster already pointed out, plenum might well be required by local codes.

      Most importantly, do not take advice from people who've already been wrong on one important point and who are not even willing to stand behind their advice. I'd take everything in the parent article with a grain of salt if I were you.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
    2. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Tuzanor · · Score: 2
      Do Not use plenum, braided, or shielded CAT5e cable

      agreed. If you really want high quality cables just go with enhanced twisted pair...

    3. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by WNight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's a little advice for you. Since you obviously hate Slashdot, don't use it. It's really easy. (See .sig)

      As for the cable... Plenum rated cable is rarely required in the walls, it's usually only required in plenums, hence the name.

      The safety benefits, in the wall, are very debatable. The whole point of it is to avoid filling the airways of a large building with potentially toxic smoke from a distant fire. In a home, by the time smoke escapes from the cabling in the walls you've got much worse problems.

      If you have the money to burn, go ahead and install it, it's not going to cause any problems.

      But, if you're really looking for safety, spend the difference on better (or more) smoke detectors, or CO detectors, or Radon detectors, etc, etc.

      And as for the AC... Personally I'd rather trust an AC who said something sensible enough to get modded up rather than trusting you, a blantant troll and karma whore. Especially considering as how the AC was right and you were very wrong.

    4. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You add *zip* to the debate except a flame, then you call someone else a "blatant [sic] troll and karma whore"? At least now we know which hypocrite wrote the AC post to which he was replying.

    5. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Salamander · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Here's a little advice for you. Since you obviously hate Slashdot, don't use it. It's really easy. (See .sig)

      Here's a little advice for you: don't jump to conclusions. If I hated Slashdot I wouldn't be here at all; ergo, since I am here, I do not hate Slashdot. I do, however, harbor a strong dislike for the herd members such as yourself who can't distinguish an informed opinion from utter BS, let alone form such an opinion for themselves, and who drown out reasoned debate with their bleating.

      an AC who said something sensible enough to get modded up

      What's the correlation between saying something sensible and getting modded up, Sparky? Herd mindset again: popular, therefore good.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
    6. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by volkris · · Score: 1

      Your charges are idiotic.
      He showed nothing herdlike. Further, your minirant against the modding system is pretty unfounded, in general. His post was much, much more informed than yours was.

      Your random attack on him in your "helpful correction" was uncalled for, making you look even worse.

    7. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by jhoug · · Score: 1

      Mr. Coward here has it right -
      --No fiber - when fiber is for houses, it'll probably be different. PVC cable is code in walls, and is easier to run than plenum cable.
      -- No STP, a pain to terminate and ground correctly, not enough improvement to be worth it.
      --Run security and alarm cables in separate run up by the ceiling, where the detectors and most of the sensors will be. Fire, Smoke, and CO detectors usually daisychain, and should not be run to your data patch. If you're building a SomewhatSmarterHouse (motion detectors for lights and heating, etc). You'll probably need a whole nuther set of cable runs for that, and a separate patch panel.
      -- Before the sheetrock goes up, take a camera and photograph each wall in each room. Get them printed immediately, and put together in a notebook with the pictures keyed to the floorplan. Cause when we need the details even the best of us RTFM (we just don't admit it).
      --Data outlets go in the next stud bay from the electric, this keeps it separate both in the wall and on the way to the computer.
      -- If you bribe your construction crew with beer, deliver the bribe at the end of the workday as they leave, preferably on Friday. Bringing them a good lunch a couple of times during the job works as well, and probably won't trigger anybody's addiction.

      --
      Recursion: To curse repeatedly.
    8. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, use plenum.

      It looks real neat when the entire house has burned down but the cabling is still there.

      Many offices use cinder blocks, which are very different than the wood studs and bricks in and on houses.

    9. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a three-digit user number and you're unable to post at +2? Wow, that's the most pathetic thing I've seen in this entire thread. You are *utterly* unqualified to determine who's informed or who "looks good" (not that the latter is important).

    10. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by BlueLightning · · Score: 1

      Good advice, except with regard to security/fire detection. Generally there's no reason why you can't home-run your smoke detector cables, it's just not usually done that way (if you do, they end up being looped inside the control panel, which is normally fine but could be bad if you have a lot of detectors and long runs). The usual method is to daisy-chain the detectors in whatever pattern that makes sense for your building/wiring layout. 4-core alarm wire is best for this since it's very flexible and easy to terminate/join. For other detectors (eg. motion), run 6-core alarm wire. For keypads, some manufacturers recommend the use of twisted-pair cable, so feel free to use CAT5 for these, otherwise 6-core alarm wire is usually fine. As long as you keep these cables away from AC mains as with ethernet cables and don't stretch or crush them you'll be fine, and it should be OK to put these in even if you're not a qualified installer.

      I recommend leaving the actual connections to a qualified alarm installer though, and even cooperating with the security company and letting them tell you where detectors should go, if you don't have experience in this area that is.

      Oh, and lastly, with regard to ethernet cabling: do not skimp on the connectors - particularly at the hub/switch end. Spend the money and get a decent patch panel and some pre-tested patch leads to connect to your hub/switch. You won't regret it.

    11. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      Yawn. Tell me again how the AC's post was "utter BS". You seem to have a problem with only one of his points, about plenum cable, and using my herd mentality, I can see that paying more for plenum rated cable in a situation where it doesn't have practical advantage is not wise. But then you just go off spouting dirt in direction of all the people in the discussion, while none of them provoked you. You make me sick.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    12. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by BlueLightning · · Score: 1

      Oh, just for clarification: daisy-chaining is only appropriate for smoke detectors, not motion detectors etc.

    13. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But of course there's no comment on "since you obviously hate Slashdot" even though that was the original personal attack in this thread. Hypocrites make me sick.

    14. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think nobody noticed the similarity between "WNight" and "darkwhite"? Stop astroturfing, you little prick.

    15. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by WNight · · Score: 2

      It's really a chuckle, but despite the similarity of "WhiteNight" and "DarkWhite", they aren't the same person.

      I'm much more handsome and articulate.

      If it panics you to no end, get the admins to check IPs.

    16. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by WNight · · Score: 2
      What's the correlation between saying something sensible and getting modded up, Sparky? Herd mindset again: popular, therefore good.


      If a factual post, containing no blatant karma whoring, gets modded up five times (from 0) it's often an indicator that it's worth reading, even if not perfect. All in all, the high score on that post was proof of the success of the system (if only this once).

      Here's a little advice for you: don't jump to conclusions. If I hated Slashdot I wouldn't be here at all; ergo, since I am here, I do not hate Slashdot.


      Sorry, I was just assuming you weren't nuts. I mean, if most people insult things, they dislike them. I see you're one of those "unique" people who insults things they like. Clever strategy.

      I do, however, harbor a strong dislike for the herd members such as yourself who can't distinguish an informed opinion from utter BS, let alone form such an opinion for themselves, and who drown out reasoned debate with their bleating.


      Ahh yes. The only way I could possibly support the AC over you, despite him being completely correct and you being wrong and a jackass, is if I'm a herd member. Silly me, I thought I just disliked you because you were a rude and stupid; I didn't know it was "in" to bash you.
    17. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by autocracy · · Score: 2
      Salamander - the symbol from Farenheit 451. Symbol for flames...

      And dot dot dot. He was correct - plenum rated cable is rated for *plenums*. Plenums are air ducts. Plenum cable will still burn. If you have cable burning in your walls, you shouldn't be around to deal with the fumes. By the time they reach you in enough concentration to cause anything beyond a gag reflex, you're probably already dead. Now, if you want to run in through your central heat/cooling ducts, that is a different story. Same with in a lot of false ceilings in office buildings. Know before you post. Admit when you're wrong, because you will be wrong at least once.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    18. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Salamander · · Score: 2
      Salamander - the symbol from Farenheit 451. Symbol for flames...

      The origin of my name here actually goes back a lot further than Ray Bradbury. In ancient times salamanders were noted not so much for starting fires but for resisting their effects. I chose the name because - contrary to claims of karma whoring - even when I first registered I could tell that this was a place there are plenty of flames to go around and independent thinkers will get even more than their share.

      BTW, I do admit that I was wrong about plenum cable in homes. No problem. I'll even apologize for the original AC wisecrack. Good luck getting any of the other participants on either side of this stupid "conversation" to show even that much contrition for their even more absurd claims or behavior - "hate Slashdot", "astroturf", "make me sick", etc.

      My point about WNight jumping to conclusions or having undue faith in the moderation system still stand, however. I've had a couple of dozen posts modded up to five in the past and I metamoderate almost every weekday, so I know damn well how frivolously mod points are often awarded. I've also been hounded by ACs after my more controversial posts enough times to have an instinctive dislike of the breed. Stick around for a while, consistently speak your own mind instead of someone else's, and see if you don't get pretty annoyed yourself at ACs or the other ovine members of the Slashdot non-community.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
    19. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by autocracy · · Score: 1
      All the time. All the fucking time man...

      And yes, you are right about the Salamander - just most people can better relate to other examples..

      --
      SIG: HUP
    20. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone say "utter BS"? No, the phrase used was "grain of salt". Learn the difference, 'tard.

  66. Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by Doctor+K · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just bought a house and instead of wiring it up, I just use 802.11b for the bedroom computers. However, my 802.11b access point / firewall also has a switched hub, so my workstations are hooked up with CAT5. This is more than fast enough for any kind of internet connection you are likely to get in the near future.

    Don't listen to the ... ahem ... "experts" telling you to install fiber. In my day job, I work in research on fiber optics technology (mostly for 40 Gb/s+ DWDM long haul and metro networks). Fiber equipment that I am familar with is not made for the consumer market.

    Would you even know what types of fiber to buy? (multi-mode / single-mode, C-band / L-band / Extended-L band, ...) Or what kind of connectors you would need? Or do you have the access to the equipment necessary to splice fibers (it's not cheap to do it right)? Do you know what kinds of equipment to attach to the end of the fiber (modulators, switches, splitters, NICs ...)? And exactly what are you going to hook up that requires fiber's speed?

    If you are worried about an upgrade path, the smart thing to do is install conduits. When fiber goes to the consumer market, you will be ready.

    Kevin

    1. Re:Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by Tuzanor · · Score: 2
      Would you even know what types of fiber to buy? (multi-mode / single-mode, C-band / L-band / Extended-L band, ...) Or what kind of connectors you would need?

      Of course you're not going to use singlemode fiber around your home. That shit is made for extremely fast long haul (10+ km) and the conectors are very bitchy to set up (you need a microscope) as they need to be lined up perfecty. Most fiber that is used for internal use is multimode and is more than adaquate for most applications. It is cheap and fast (for LAN/WAN use).

      Fiber equipment that I am familar with is not made for the consumer market.

      This is somewhat true. It depends how you look at it. There is fiber running from a lot of DVD players to Dolby 5.1 systems. Most new Cisco switches and routers have fiber "uplink" ports for clustering and uplinking...though those aren't meant for "consumer" use. Then again most slashdot users probably aren't your typical computer consumers and many of use have several computers running doing different things.

      I am planning on getting a Catalyst 3524 Xl. That is a 24 port 10/100 switch with 2 GBIC-Based fiber ports. They aren't cheap new, but you can get them for about $1500 used on ebay if you are patient enough to wait and get lucky.

    2. Re:Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by Doctor+K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The CD player I bought in 1996 had "fiber optic" outputs. (It was a high end model and I still haven't seen a consumer D/A converter with comparable specs.) And now in 2001, the fiber optic output is still unused. A/V equipment with fiber optic output is nothing new. Even before then, the security system at the electronics store I worked at in high school (circa 1993) consisted of a "fiber optic" loop. A red-LED would send a pulse every through the cable every second (you could see it looking at the fiber end-on). If the cable was broken, the pulse wouldn't be received and thus you would know that somebody was trying to walk off with a floor model.

      However, in both these applications the type of cabling and what not is not what people usually think of when they are talk about fiber optics (hence the quotation marks). In both applications, you are only moving the signal a couple of feet and the signal has very low bandwidth. As a result, you can get away with a lot of slop and do most of the implementation with plastic fibers, normal LEDs and no fancy couplers.

      If you want to talk moderate bandwidth computer use (1 Mb/s - 100 Mb/s), I can't think of any advantages of fiber over CAT5 and wireless (except possibly EMI). All I can see are drawbacks (price, fickle connectors, comparatively little support ... ).

      If you are talking high bandwidth (over 1 Gb/s), then you want to consider fiber. However, I would like to know what a home user is doing that needs 1 Gb/s. Someday, users might be running multi-Gb/s home networks. When that happens, I don't expect a DVD optic patch cable to be up to snuff. Furthermore, I don't expect multi-Gb/s home networks to happen before this guy sells his home anyways (5 years is the rule of thumb used by real estate agents).

      So why spend the money laying fiber when:

      - CAT5 and wireless are good enough for the foreseeable future.

      - Standards for fiber home networks are practically non-existant such that picking the right underlying technology becomes a gamble.

      - The home's resale value is better enhanced with conduits.

      Kevin

    3. Re:Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by autocracy · · Score: 2

      He's in a house. He'll use multi-mode, because it's cheap(er). You aren't familiar with the equipment he'd have because he's talking gigabit - as in one, not forty. He'll use it for a LAN. And thanks for sharing all the information that was way over the top of the topic.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    4. Re:Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by autocracy · · Score: 2

      However, before you and the rest of /. think(s) I'm an asshole for my response to your original post - yes. This is said well...

      --
      SIG: HUP
  67. A hole in Cambridge by Tim+Ward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone is telling you to put conduit in ... this reminds me:

    The Cambridge University Computing Service, several years back, wanted to run a network round the city to connect to various University departments, colleges etc. To pay fo this they had to persuade all these bodies to cough up a significant amount of money as their share of the capital costs.

    Trouble was that people thought they were being asked to pay for high-tech stuff which would go out of date in a few years, so the marketing job was to persuade them that they were actually being asked to pay for an extremely low tech hole in the ground, through which any appropriate type of cable could easily and cheaply be drawn in years to come.

    This worked. The hole got built.

    1. Re:A hole in Cambridge by mpe · · Score: 2

      Trouble was that people thought they were being asked to pay for high-tech stuff which would go out of date in a few years, so the marketing job was to persuade them that they were actually being asked to pay for an extremely low tech hole in the ground, through which any appropriate type of cable could easily and cheaply be drawn in years to come.

      Low tech trenchs can be very expensive. Especially where they have to cross cities. Once you have accounted for getting appropriate permissions and paperwork, doing the dig and reinstating the surface actually paying for the conduit and cable is the cheap bit.

  68. Use Cat5 for phone _and_ network by NiceBacon · · Score: 1

    Just wire the entire thing with cat5. You can run phone and/or network as you wish. Don't need a phone outlet in a room? Use the outlet for network instead.

    I just wired my apartment, and I only put in cat5. I can run my phone over it or I can run network, as I wish. Fiber is terribly inflexible and the gear is pretty damn expensive (try finding a fiber 100Mbit switch or something similar - it'll cost you more than the entire installation).
    Another thing : You can't just connect a hub to a fiber outlet if you need more gear connected.

    But if you have the cash, stick fiber next to the cat5 and leave in unconnected, in case you need it in ten years.

  69. Conduit ... by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

    Ideally you would have installed conduit, and on an unlimited budget, strung combo cable (twisted pair and fiber) through it.

    However, plain old twisted pair is extremely versatile. Having more than one cat 5 cable is not a bad idea. Did you know that twisted pair makes an excellent medium for line-level audio distribution? Just put balancing transformers on either end ... no need for coax!

    -Joseph N. Hall

  70. 10000 base t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont think my harddrive transfers that fast

    damn

    1. Re:10000 base t? by Captoo · · Score: 1

      This is actually a good point. I work for a company that makes gigabit equipment (both fiber and copper). Even a $20,000 server has a hard time using that much bandwidth. Most of our customers are lucky to get 300-500 Mb throughput because the hard drives, processors, RAM, PCI busses, etc. are all bottlenecks. Unless you're creating a backbone for a lot of hardware, stick with 100Mb. It's cheaper and you won't likely gain much by going to gigabit any time soon.

      Oh, uh, that and use conduits in key locations, just like everyone else said.

  71. 25 pairs... by fm6 · · Score: 2
    There's not a whole lot you can't do with 25 pairs.
    Oh Lord. You're right, of course. But putting that much capacity into a residential network still boggles my mind.
    1. Re:25 pairs... by windex · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine just wired up the center of his house with 200-pair, then split off from there. You think 25's bad...

    2. Re:25 pairs... by Antipop · · Score: 1

      But putting that much capacity into a residential network still boggles my mind.

      You can never have enough bandwidth...

    3. Re:25 pairs... by fm6 · · Score: 2

      True, but bandwidth is another issue. You'd need special hardware to concentrate and deconcentrate 25 data streams at each access point. (I guess a standard router would do, but those aren't cheap -- or small.) I think fibre actually would be cheaper in that case!

    4. Re:25 pairs... by funaho · · Score: 1

      When i wired my house (it's a 100+ year old house in the middle of Detroit) i ran 16 pairs of cat5 to each drop with at least one drop per room. That's four 4-pair cables, all wired down into a patch panel in the basement. Generally each faceplate is set up with two RJ-45s (for Ethernet) and two RJ-11s (for phones.)

      Now that I've read this I'm thinking of repulling 25-pair cables. It would make my wiring a LOT cleaner in the basement and give me a chance to do some of the runs better.

  72. Just beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, if you ask this question at Slashdot you will probably get too many answers. Please, remember to sift thouroughly. A good advice too many is no advice, as my late uncle always said.

    However, my friends cousin's wife knows somebody who is pretty wild with cables. But I'm not sure, so take any of his advice (if you meet him, of course) with a pinch of salt.

    Notwithstanding any unforeseen issues, and otherwise, why not live in a Faraday cage?

  73. have the electrcian do it by chrismcc@netus.com · · Score: 1

    Hello...

    If the electrician is running wire anyway. ask him to run the cat5 also. have him run the phones and cat5 to 2 or 4 port faceplates. If there is a jack, there is a phone and ethernet both. run all the cat5 to a patch panel. Running cable is fun ... for an hour or so. Let the expert do it and save yourself some grief.

    --
    Christopher McCrory "The guy that keeps the servers running" chrismcc@gmail.com http://www.pricegrabber.com
  74. Cat-6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are looking for a short term but prepare for the future network. I suggest running cat 6 in plastic conduit.
    Amp sells cat6 not sure who else LINK

  75. Your code may vary by fm6 · · Score: 2

    And besides, toxic fumes are toxic fumes, even if they're legal!

    1. Re:Your code may vary by jrockway · · Score: 1

      My house doesn't burn down very often though. Although I did put some Windows in...

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:Your code may vary by fm6 · · Score: 2

      Yep, and the Titanic didn't sink very often either!

  76. Fiber cheap, termination expensive. by Thomas+Wendell · · Score: 1

    If you run fiber, there's a chance you'll never use it. Since a big part of the cost of fiber is the termination, if you want to run fiber just run the cable and wait to pay for termination until you're ready to actually use it.

  77. I just did this by renehollan · · Score: 5, Informative
    Well, worse: I bought a house already built.

    I ended up running 2 runs of Cat5e and 2 runs of quad-shielded RG-6 to 6 drops.

    You will want the coax... trust me. While I'd like to run everythng over UTP or fiber, the costs of locating things like VCRs, and satellite receivers at a head end, and streaming video digitally are prohibitive compared to the costs of running the coax. You may want to plan for the day when everything is streamed over IP and carried on an ethernet or fiber physical layer, but I think it is far better to have dead cable in the wall than to use horribly expensive equipment today as opposed to your neighbor who just hooks up the new TV to the cable outlet and is done.

    Fiber. I didn't run any, but mostly because of the cost -- it's still too expensive. Also, don't forget headend terminations for all those fiber lines -- they are expensive. If you can afford it, by all means. In my case, I figure I'll sell the house and build a new one before I have a real pressing need for fiber: am I really going to want to stream full-resolution uncompressed video room to room? I doubt it.

    Do put in as many drops as you think you'll need, and then some. You have an advantage over me: your walls aren't up yet. Plan for a minimum of one per room, more if there are multiple entrances. For example, many central family rooms open up to formal dining/living rooms and kitchen -- place the outlet on the "wrong" wall and you'll have to snake a cable across an entryway... not cool.

    If you can afford the cabling, make EACH 110VAC outlet have a co-located (but not sharing the box-- that violates code) coax/data drop. That's excessive, and you immediately have to separate the AC and other cables to avoid interference, but you'll have a drop whereever you need one. Personally, I'd probably stick with one outlet per continuous wall segment, more for bigger rooms.

    I ran 2xCat5e and 2xRG-6 (quad-shielded). You can get combo cable (speedwrap) that contains this (with or without fiber) in a single jacket that makes for easy pulling, but expect to pay double over individual cables. If you're paying for installation, the reduced labour might pay for the more expensive cable. Note: the reason for two runs of coax is in case you want to run a video stream back to the headend, like, perhaps a baby monitor camera. However, with recent PVR having TWO tuners, you'll find you need to use both coax cables, espescially with satellite systems (the receiver sends a signal selecting satellite and polarization to the multiswitch over the coax -- you don't have all channels on the cable at once). If you want to do this and send video back to the headend you may need three coax cables.. though a cheap PC and webcam might do the trick over the Cat5-e instead (and I can think of creative uses of satellite diplexers to use two coaxes for two satellite signals, one cable/off air signal, and a backfeed, but I haven't tried it).

    As for plugging phones into RJ-45s... why bother? Just terminate one of the Cat5e cables in an RJ-14 jack, leaving one pair not connected... you can have up to three lines on that RJ-14. Alternately, split it out in the box to two RJ-14s. You can always require for ethernet later, if you have to (or use a PBX that requires 8 wires). This also ensures that you don't accidently plug the phone in the wrong outlet (confusing the coax ports is bad enough).

    I'd post more, but have to go.

    --
    You could've hired me.
    1. Re:I just did this by MisterBlue · · Score: 1

      A few years ago I crawled through attics and basements and ran multiple CAT5s to various rooms. One thing I learned was: hubs are good.
      That is, if I had to do it over again, I'd run two CAT5 to a drop and if more things need to be plugged in, add a hub. Two CAT5's -- one for phone, one for network.

    2. Re:I just did this by renehollan · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah! There's nothing quite like straddling the ceiling joists above the family room (you know, the one with the 12 foot ceiling), holding on to a wall stud, and drilling through a top plate.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    3. Re:I just did this by Tiroth · · Score: 2

      Actually you can run video quite effectively over just STP (or even UTP) if you turn it into a differential signal. This is probably not worth doing through unless you build the converters yourself, but it is a cheap solution for people who have unused twisted pairs.

    4. Re:I just did this by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Yeah, and I looked into this as an option, but (a) converters are expensive, (b) building them yourself might be fun, but takes time (something I have little of (sigh)), (c) it requires all your RF equipment at the headend.

      Often you want to distribute component video, so you need three pairs, and a digital audio signal (oops, another pair). You can't take advantage of multi-tuner capabilities of modern TV sets, 'cause you don't have a broadband feed.

      I came to the conclusion that it's best to pull the coax for "legacy" equipment, and if I ever wanted to transmit video over IP, I'd use MPEG2 encoders -- they're no longer insanely priced and I expect them to become cheaper as time goes on.

      Now, if your cable is already run, and you need that extra composite or svideo signal, and you've got a spare pair or two, by all means, use them.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    5. Re:I just did this by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure MPEG2 encoding is a realistic option for the near future though; even at DVD-bitrate most realtime encoders create very noticeable artifacting. The advantage that content creators have is they can master everything offline by hand...and I'd bet they take advantage of this more as MPEG2/HDTV becomes the standard for distribution.

      The chrominance sampling is also very atrocious compared to full-bandwidth D1. If you are talking about taking compressed video (from Satellite/ATSC decoder/DVD/etc) and unencoding it, then re-encoding it in a worse way, the results won't be pretty. (especially since you are cascading your chrominance losses) Of course, if you are looking to serve this to a 15" TV, you probably won't notice that much. (or will you?)

      You could send SDI, which is not all that unreasonable for D1 (270Mbps?)...but as other posters have noted high-res HDTV requires ridiculous bandwidth. SDI is also hugely expensive to encode and decode.

      Basically we've come full cirle to your original idea, which is "run some damn RG-6!" ;)

    6. Re:I just did this by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Yeah, I didn't want to run a bunch of different cable, but RG-6 was most practical. Believe me, I was thinking of all sorts of ways to use Cat5e for digital audio (doable on one pair) and component video (balun-ed on the other three), but the result is an ugly hack, permits only one video signal to a destination, and analog. Sending the baseband satellite feed on a coax, at least lets the receiver in each room decode a digital signal (albeit compressed).

      And no, I would certainly not transcode a digital satellite feed -- you're right about the cascading errors. I just put the damn baseband feed from the multiswitch on the coax and be done with it.

      Now, there are some interesting terrestrial HDTV decoder cards for PCs that provide an MPEG2 stream (either encoded off-line, or real-time with decent equipment (i.e. for live programming)) -- I think Telemann makes one for around US$400. A couple of these at the headend to permit streamed MPEG2-compressed HDTV over IP on the ethernet would be cool.

      It is very seductive to want GigE and headend sources that can provide as much switched digital audio and video as each room can handle, and do away with the coax. But we "ain't there yet".

      Also, once you start doing things like PIP (picture in picture) at the receiver in each room, you suddenly realize that you don't need all the streams to be full-resolution, certainly not the PIP stream... it would make more sense for it to be downsampled in real time before being sent to the remote room.

      It looks like what you want is a digital stream over 100 Mb/s ethernet or GigE (you did run Cat5e, right?) demodulated from whatever source (terrestrial HDTV, satellite, etc.) at the headend, with a resolution negotiated between equipment in each room and the headend demodulator. So, you could get a full-res main stream, and a 1/4 res PIP.

      D1 over GigE? I suppose it is possible.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    7. Re:I just did this by Tiroth · · Score: 1

      Now, there are some interesting terrestrial HDTV decoder cards for PCs that provide an MPEG2 stream (either encoded off-line, or real-time with decent equipment (i.e. for live programming)) -- I think Telemann makes one for around US$400.
      I think the hard part here would be reproducing the ATSC format, as I'm not aware of any cards that can accept a raw stream.

      It looks like what you want is a digital stream over 100 Mb/s ethernet or GigE (you did run Cat5e, right?) demodulated from whatever source (terrestrial HDTV, satellite, etc.) at the headend, with a resolution negotiated between equipment in each room and the headend demodulator. So, you could get a full-res main stream, and a 1/4 res PIP.
      Hehe...so what you are saying is "only $2000 per port?" ;)

      D1 over GigE? I suppose it is possible.
      This is actually pretty easy I imagine...take a bt878 card and use the linux drivers or dscaler code to send the output over UDP. Pass the incoming stream to bttv or dscaler for a HDTV-compatible output. Total cost: a couple relatively cheap boxes, $50 in TV cards, NICs. With good drivers you should be able to do 3 streams over gigabit. The real problem is going to be PCI bandwidth at the source...3x250Mbits in+3x300Mbits out is a bit much. That's the price you pay though for building a $10000 video routing setup for pennies on the dollar.

      It is all so useless though, because if you have the money for this kind of setup you problably won't want to watch D1 video.

  78. Is fiber really needed? by haesu · · Score: 1

    As for wiring a new tech-savvy house, you should consider few things. The technology is always improving and fiber is not a cheap material. Therefore technologies like Gigabit Ethernet are getting closer to users via copper. I would say use either high grade CAT5e or even CAT6 for the whole house, and you should even think about running phone wires over CAT5e or CAT6 as well. Who knows if you ever want to move up t Digital phones or VoIP later? You never know.. For your basement, where it will be the "MDF" Main distributio facility for your house, you may want to think about fiber there, as a backbone cabling. But then again, all this is just infrastructural cost. In order to really take benefit into this, you will end up having some enterprise class network in your house with tons of money spent... Think about what you really want... Good luck

  79. Plenum Rated and other tips. by tercero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did this to my house last year.

    If you go the Cat5e route, be absolutely certain to pay the extra few bucks to get Plenum rated cable instead of PVC. Plenum rated cable won't put off toxic fumes if it catches fire. Also, your local fire marshall will love you.

    I recommend running wire, the night that only one side of the drywall is placed, this way you have something to anchor it to and get a reference of where your plugs are and need to be.

    Phone cables now are typically Cat5 or Cat5e. Don't use them unless you must, crosstalk can be bad.

    Lastly run 2 cables everywhere a computer can fit. Do you want an automated house in the future? Plan now! Maybe you don't but when you sell the house do you want that as a selling point? HTH

    1. Re:Plenum Rated and other tips. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Also, your local fire marshall will love you.

      The importance of this cannot be understated. All's fair in love and war, and typically there are multiple competing suitors. When attempting to seduce a fire marshall, you should exploit any edge that you can get.

  80. Conduit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 years, I bought a new house, but did not get to spec it or anything else. So went through and retrofitted it. What I would suggest is to plan for the future rather than trying to know exactly what you need (like coding, you will never know exactly what the future holds). In each room, install a double or quad gangbox and then bring 3/4" conduit out of it into the basement or the attic. Make the runs straight (or very little bends) so that in the future you can switch to Fiber. I would also suggest doing this by an electical box so that you can use power if you need it (not likely). While, this may seem costly, I have already run cable through all of these and found that to add it to every room took only 3 hours (lots of cimbing in the attic). Also, if you are like me with a 3 stories, I run the conduit upstairs to the attic and the middle floor to the basement. In order to connect things easily, i have 1.5" conduit going from attic to electrical closet on 2'nd floor and a 1.5 " from electrical closet to basement. I wanted to add Speackers everywhere, but I will need to increase the size of these trans floor conduits. I would suggest 2" of better.

    My company is getting ready to develop some equipment for Wireless. ONe of the things that I want us to develop is a switch that provides POE over cat 5, but manual switchs. This idea of doing it automatically is for the birds and every expensive. During that time, we will than develop some hardware for house (strong arm device with card bus/cf , audio, ethernet, and several types of displays (small to large). Even if we don't do it, somebody will.
    Plan for it.

    1. Re:Conduit by Grand+Pooh-Bah · · Score: 1

      I am at the wireing phase in my new house, and I am having my electricion run conduit every place that I am going to drop in cat5e.

  81. what KIND of fibre??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fibre comes in 9 micron, 50 micron, 62.5 micron, and 125 micron. Also comes in single mode fibre and multi-mode fibre. Each of these has different applications depending on what you want to do (although 50 micron and 62.5 micron can usually be used interchangably) Also, what type of connectors do you need? LC? SC? ST? again, it depends on what your using the fibre for.

  82. I just did this today.:) by rute_1 · · Score: 1

    This is funny you posted this today, as I just got back frrom wiring a house that's being built for me. Some things to keep in mind.

    1. Make sure you do your wireing after the electrical inspector has been through and before the walls go up. This should give you probably one weekend to do it.

    2. Buy a can of the spray filler for the holes.

    3. You can use the holes your contractors have drilled for your current phone and cable runs. The foam stuff punches out easily.

    4. I ran a cat5 cable to every cable box and phone box in the house. I also ran two cat5 cables to the phone and cable boxes in my study.

    5. Make sure you have in mind how you're going to connect everything when you're done. In my case, I did it the cheap way and ran all of wires to the closet in my study. I put in a double wide box. This is enough for my 12 connections.

    6. When you run the wires, use wire tacs to tac them down. This will keep contractors from screwing up your cable runs when they are doing their work.

    7. It shouldn't cause that much of a problem in a home to cross electrical wires as long as you don't run them parallel along the electrical wires for a very long distance. Shoot, most network cables running in a house, even to the hub is going to run close to an electrical wire at some point.

    These were just some pointer I learned this morning while running my network cable in my new house.

  83. Lots of drops (2 4-pair is enough per box) by em.a18 · · Score: 1

    Put in a phone/enet drop between every door in every room.... anyplace you can conceive of putting a desk, a wired picture frame, or an MP3 decoder. You really don't want to run ethernet across a door. Much better to have lots of wall boxes so you can decide later where to put things.

    I'd put the boxes in, pull the wire and then on the long winter nights you can terminate the cables that you need.

  84. Fiber isn't all it's hyped to be by amorsen · · Score: 1

    If you put in fiber, it will be multimode fiber, because it is cheaper and you can get fiber ports for multimode relatively cheaply. Right now you can do 1 Gbps over multimode. However, it isn't clear that future high speed nets will work over multimode. Singlemode fiber is too expensive to really consider, except possibly for putting in dark fiber and hoping that the singlemode fiber ports will magically become cheap some day

    Cat5e gets you to 1 Gbps, and it's cheap. It's highly likely that it will be possible to go faster than 1 Gbps on it, even if you might never reach more than 5 Gbps. Just put in plenty of Cat5e and conduits so you can put in whichever fiber standard turns out to win in the end, if you should need to.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  85. Bunch of pessimests :) by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    Loads of u are talking bout running special non burning cable :) cant u lot think positive for a change :) if my house is going to burn, id like it to burn good :)

    1. Re:Bunch of pessimests :) by webmaestro · · Score: 1

      I don't think they are talking about fire-resistant cable as much as cable that won't give off harmful fumes when it does burn.

  86. Building Codes by eander315 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Be aware that building codes may prohibit you from doing any of this. Most likely you'll be fine, but I would check first.

    Secondly, make sure you're using the right kind of cat-5 for the job. PVC type is cheaper, but is less resistant to heat and can cause noxious fumes if burned. Plenum type insulation is more resistant to heat, and is certified for use in air ducts because it doesn't produce the fumes that PVC will. Unfortunately, Plenum is more expensive. In any case, keep track of heat sources when you're wiring. The fireplace and oven, for instance, may cause you problems if you run cable right behind them.

    You may want to run 2 different colors of cat-5, one for voice and one for data. Cat-5 can handle up to 4 voice lines through one cable. In any case, make sure you label everything.

    Finally, don't forget to run coax (as well as any other cables you may need for ANYTHING, such as speaker cable, RCA, etc.), as you may need to add a TV or cable modem connection. No one likes having their cable modem sitting on the TV. e

  87. Some thoughts on the topic by hairyian · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to run fibre? Let's just run through some of the reasons why...

    Fibre doesn't suffer many of the EM interferance problems that electrons-in-wires do. Useful, in a high noise environment...

    ...then again, my computer doesn't crash when I turn a light on nearby when the case is off. Not running parallel to AC-power carrying wires is a must though - long parallel lengths will introduce crosstalk. Just don't do it, or when you do maximise the distance between the power cable and the data cable (or use data cable).

    The transmission length of a fibre is much greater than that of a wire at high speeds...

    ...but then, how big is your house? 100BaseT ethernet over Cat5 gets you 100m typically... is your house so large that it won't reach? If you need more bandwidth, then Gigabit ethernet over balanced copper gets you 25m... but if you really need that then compression will have gone out of fashion. :)

    Reasons why not...

    Fibre is expensive! (Copper wire is cheap.)

    One thing which is also worth noting is that 10BaseT and 100BaseT only use 2 pairs (4 wires), and CAT5 has 8. This means you can put one 10/100BaseT stream and still have 2 pairs left for 2 audio/phone lines, a second ethernet stream or whatever.

    This is obviously a contentious issue, and isn't flamebait on purpose (though it is perhaps possible that a fibre-in-the-home advocate might see it as such). IMO, copper wire will be around for a very long time - it's actually not too bad as long as you don't want to move data over to the other side of town....

    Ian Woods

  88. Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not use CAT6 ?

    You can easily get Gigybit-Ethernet over Copper with that when it gets cheaper.

    Cable tubes are another option

  89. Don't forget to run the conduit vertically by coyote-san · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One other point is that conduit pipes should be run vertically. Running a 2" pipe through all of your wall studs is a Bad Idea, but running such a pipe vertically is another matter entirely. It also makes it easier to install the insulation. (You want insulation on interior walls for the sound proofing. A little money now will save a lot of headaches when your kids are teenagers.)

    You also want a large pipe that's a straight shot from attic to basement/crawlspace.

    The idea is that you have good access in attic and basement/crawlspace, so they don't need special treatments. But walls are a real pain once they're sealed, so you want to keep it as simple as possible. And nothing is simplier than a large vertical pipe with no bends in it. Even if the pipe is completely empty (e.g., you sealed in a few extra pipes "just in case"), you can pull a line with nothing but a string and a lead weight.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Don't forget to run the conduit vertically by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      You also want a large pipe that's a straight shot from attic to basement/crawlspace

      Additionally, you want something like a bike hook ($.50 at Home Depot) by the top of the pipe to loop wire runs around. 20 feet of 4 to 8 cat5 cables weigh a fair amount and they want to fall back down the pipe.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    2. Re:Don't forget to run the conduit vertically by thogard · · Score: 1

      It also makes it easier to install the insulation

      Another thing to do before they slap up the dry wall is consider how much quieter the house will be with insulation in all the walls. It will also help if you want to put sound in each room since you will get odd phase things going on tring to run stero in some rooms and 5.1 in one and dfferent volume levels in different rooms.

    3. Re:Don't forget to run the conduit vertically by jamoke · · Score: 0

      It's even better if you can run the conduit from each point all the way back to a central location where you might keep your hub/server, etc. Try not to exceed 3 90degree bends in the pipe run, and I would use at least 3/4" if not 1" emt electrical conduit. A conduit bender is cheap at the hardware store, and the conduit itself is also cheap. Use setscrew type connectors(they are cheaper and less likely to come apart on you like compression connectors). Running conduit like this is a bit more expensive, and time consuming, but the benefit is that you will be prepared for any transmission medium that might become popular in the future. A set up like this will serve the owners of the home indefinitely... Cheers!

  90. fast ethernet and POTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a newly built house that was wired with Cat5e for the phone
    drops (near radio transmission towers). I have been trying to
    figure out what to do with the situation and have found:
    ethernet uses *1* twisted pair (Cat3 or better)
    fast ethernet uses *1* twisted pair (Cat5 or better)
    POTS uses *1* pair {phone line and better)
    gigabit uses *4* twisted pairs (Cat5e or better)
    (fast ethernet over Cat3 uses a similar setup)
    Cat5e has *4* twisted pairs

    Can anyone tell me why I can't run POTS and fast ethernet on the same cable with the pairs
    terminated to their respective terminal type?

    POTS terminated onto an RJ45 might not be such a good idea
    because the line voltage will fry a NIC if they used the same hot pair (?).
    Keeping the pair twisted until the last 1.5cm will maintain the signal even if the cover is absent and there
    are no other adjacent twisted pairs since these are unshielded cables (?). The twists
    are what prevents signal loss, and the diff. between Cat5 and Cat3
    is the number of twists per unit length.

    1. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by GC · · Score: 1, Informative

      ethernet uses *1* twisted pair (Cat3 or better)
      fast ethernet uses *1* twisted pair (Cat5 or better)


      Half Duplex Ethernet/Fast Ethernet use 2 pairs
      Full Duplex Ethernet/Fast Ethernet use 4 pairs

      Full Duplex is not CSMA/CD (Collision Sense Multiple Access/Collision Detect), which means that the NIC can operate 100Mbps downstream and 100Mbps upstream simultaneously in the case of Fast-Ethernet.

      Our office is cabled with Cat-5E and I've never experienced a fried NIC connected accidentaly to a fax or modem line.

    2. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by YKnot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Both half and full duplex ethernet in the 10mbit and 100mbit variety use 2 pairs, one for sending, one for receiving.

    3. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by mmontour · · Score: 1

      100BaseTX uses 2 pairs. However there were some earlier 100 Mbit technologies (100BaseT4, 100BaseVG) that did use 4 pairs. I found a bit of info here.

    4. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by YKnot · · Score: 1

      100BaseT4 can not provide 100MBit/s in both directions simultaneously since it was designed to use Cat3 cabling, which is limited to 25MHz bandwith. It uses one pair for sending, one for receiving, and the other two pairs either transmit or receive data as needed. VG(VoiceGrade)-AnyLAN has similar limitations. This stuff is completely outdated and bringing it up here is only adding to the confusion, if you want to hear my opinion.

    5. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by GC · · Score: 3, Informative

      oh great -

      moderators mod this one up 1 (but I don't get any credit as my karma is 50 already), then two come alone a and mod it down...

      back to 48... lovely...

      It seems I have been mistaken though - I've looked and it seems that all use 2 pairs except for T4 and Gigabit Ethernet over copper... the best I could find was this reference, it makes no mention of duplex, but does give some information.

      I have no idea where I got the idea that full duplex required extra pairs - I must be such a dumbo.

    6. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by YKnot · · Score: 1

      Same here, down to 49 for correcting you. 2 moderators thought it was informative, then another one came along and thought +4 was a little much for pointing out the "obvious"... What the hell, it's only karma.
      Now to make this remotely on topic: One can run 2 full-duplex 100 MBit ethernet connections over one 8-wire cat5 cable. Depending on distance covered and personal luck this can work flawlessly. (Does for me, but do some testing and watch the frame error counter.) That may be an option for someone who needs another ethernet socket but can't easily pull another cable because (shudder) there are no cable conduits. This will however not work with gigabit ethernet and using the spare pairs as phone lines will also most likely lock cheapskates out of gigabit heaven - don't do it. There's nothing wrong with using an extra cat5 cable for phones though. Then you'll have extra pairs for remote controls, intercom, etc.

    7. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by mpe · · Score: 2

      POTS terminated onto an RJ45 might not be such a good idea because the line voltage will fry a NIC if they used the same hot pair

      Ethernet usually runs on pairs 1&2 (orange) and 3&6 (green). Telephones (at least of the US style variety) have the line on pins 3&4 (RJ11) or 4&5 (RJ45, blue). The only possible complications are two line telephones which use pins 2&5 RJ11 which correspond to pins 3&6 RJ45 for a second line.

  91. How about some PVC Conduit? by GSloop · · Score: 1

    I do a fair bit of wiring for clients when the project is small - and I am trying to move my wifes station back upstairs - so I do have some expierence here...

    From someone that has run one of those long drill bits right out through the sheetrock and numerous other damage while trying to run wiring different places - I have a suggestion.

    A simple NMC (PVC) conduit run into a few rooms in strategic places whouldn't be too time consuming, and would make any drastic decisions moot. You could upgrade the Cat5 to 6 or 7, or fiber or whatever follows. Sure it's more work, but it maintains the ability to do more later.

    If I build a new house, I will run 2 sets of conduits everywhere -1 for electrical, and one for data phone. Sure, it'll cost me time and money, but I'll be happy as a pig in a mud bog!

    If you choose to not do this, the suggestions of others to put in coax everywhere too is a good one.

  92. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > In the long run you will be better off

    It will be very long time befor you are better off with fiber.
    You can use Cat5 UTP cable for gigabit eternet. So it is going to be a while befor fiber becomes a necessity.

  93. Use CAT5e and you have flexibility by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am preparing to build my own house as well and have been looking at this very issue.

    What I have decided was to run 6+ normal CAT5e wires to each room. This may seem like a lot but... Comready.com has 1000' spools for 40+$ so price is not that great of an issue.

    Now for the secret ingredients. First of all.. For network just use 1 or more standard CAT5e cables to do that in each room. You can then run up to 4 phone lines on another CAT5e cable. You then have 3 left.

    Milestek.com has cat5 baluns that let you transmit everything from S-video to Broadband Video in case you ever want video in any room.

    That also leaves a couple cables free for intercoms and such.

    If you want to lessen the cable runs or hook more things up in each room in the future you get something like the NJ-100 that we saw the article on slashdot about a couple weeks ago.

    Happy home hacking!

    --
    Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    1. Re:Use CAT5e and you have flexibility by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      It's much smarter to have a hub in each room than to run multiple ethernet lines to each room. Just run two cat5 cables: one for phone, and the other for ethernet.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Use CAT5e and you have flexibility by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to have a hub in every room? It seems like it would just be overkill and add additional costs. Plus you now have to have a hub somewhere out in the open. And what happens when you want 2 phones in a given room, say across your living room?

      Adding additional drops to a room is dirt cheap. By having multiple drops spread across a room that all lead back to a central switch/hub would be just as good and easy when the drywall hasn't been put up. You can get rid of the hastle of trying to hide the cable as you snake it across the room because the drop will ALWAYS be on the other side of the room where you want. Future connectivity is a snap. Just plug in the patch cable to the closest port and your ready to go. If you were going to have a more then several computers in one room the the hubs/switches could be justified, but I think it would be overkill for all but the most geekiest of houses.

  94. Something you might think of by BrodyVess · · Score: 1

    While your doing this, just put a cat5e drop everywhere, dont worry about phones. Since phone works over cat5, I would put real cat5 drops everywhere, with color coding for the one that will be "mostly" phone. Just get a colored jack.

    Then, keep your patch panel and hub in the garage, make the phone people install somewhat close to it (or run from the outside phone box to another patch panel thats just telephone). Then you can use patch cables to go from phone patch to wiring patch, or from the wiring patch to your hubs/switches. This kind of setup lets you use any jack, anywhere for whatever. And please listen to the people that say run rca/coax/sheilded speaker/any-other-wire-that-anything-you-have-uses . May cost more now (hey, thats what building a house is all about) but it will make your life SO much easier. It also prevents things like the chunk of coax that my dad had hotwired directly from the satelite reciever, into the attic, down his closet, across his bedroom, and to his tv. After he died my mom spent months wondering what that was before I told her.

    Another thought i just had. Has anyone suggested 802.11b? If thats your thing you could forget wiring anything but an access point (or maybe2 depending on how big your house is, stories, obstructions, interference). I've not messed with it much, but it seems like a rather elegant solution when compared to so much wire. Consider security drawbacks and the like

    --
    No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
  95. Just install conduit and wall service boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When building my new home I ran conduit from the basement to the attic and then into the office, bedrooms, etc. and now when I want new service I just pull wires. Piece of cake

  96. take pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of where all of the wires are run and all of the other utiliities for future reference, in the event that you want to fish other wires/fiber later.

    Do this before insulation or drywall is in place.

  97. More observations by d0d63 · · Score: 1

    I had the builder of my house run cat5, and it was something of a mstake for the following reasons.

    First, the electricians didn't know the difference between running cat5 for phone service versus for ethernet. So the first time through, they ran all the cat5 in series. Ethernet doesn't work so well that way. :-)

    Second (saw this elsewhere, but duplicating because it's important), use plenum. When it burns it doesn't release toxic gasses.
    I saw someone mention 802.11 as an alternative. Wireless network protocols will always be vulnerable to timing attacks. In the meantime, it's much easier to just brute force the lame-ass crypto most vendors ship with.

    I would have liked to have installed PVC conduits, but I never got very far in reseraching it. It probably would have been a good idea, especially since the electricians who installed this staple-gunned the cat5 directly into the 2x4's. Grr.

  98. Use Quality Cable Only by Dan+Guisinger · · Score: 1

    A school i worked at 3 years ago, every time a phone would ring or the bells would ring, computers in some of the computer labs would lock up. Ends up there was way too much cross talk between the cables they ran side-by-side.

    Just something to think about.

  99. 10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by SnapperHead · · Score: 2

    A big question to ask your self is are you running 10 or 100Mbit ? If your only running 10, your only using 5 wires out of the cat 5 cable. (Or is it 4) 100Mbit uses all of the cable. If your only running 10 (Which I couldn't understand, with 100Mbit cards so cheap these days) You can run the phone line inside of the same cable.

    Personally, I would run 2 cables in each room. Unless you have 2 offices. Think about it, with 100Mbit you can have a smaller hub in each room if you *REALLY* need it. Chances are, you won't be using that much bandwidth all day long.

    Plus, with the new 56Mbit wireless standard that was just released, I am not sure how many people will keep using cat5 cable across there house. I have my main machines running at 100Mbit (There in the same room), and everything else in the house is via wireless connection. Once I get IPSec working, it will be less of a hassle to worry about the security of the network :)

    At any rate, 2 in each room seems plenty for most home LANs. Unless you have 400 computers. My old house at 40 machines running 24/7, and 100Mbit was more or less required. (Don't ask :)

    --
    until (succeed) try { again(); }
    1. Re:10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      Kind of weak for a troll.

      both 10Mb and 100Mb use 4 wires. The difference is in the number of twists per meter as well as more stringent quality requirements. Anyway, there's really no reason to wire a new house with 10Mb; cable is cheap and so are switches.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    2. Re:10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by TheDancer · · Score: 2, Informative

      10Base-T uses pins 1 2 3 and 6.
      100Base-TX uses pins 1 2 3 and 6.
      100Base-T4 uese all pins.

      100Base-T4 is a specification so that Category 3 cable can be used for 100Mbps speeds. Although you need special NICs and hubs to use 100Base-T4. It's not until you reach Gigabit (1000Base-T) that all four pairs are used. The actual standard allows for 1000Base-T over Cat-5, but most people reccomend Cat-5e. Although a Cat-5 installation must pass TSB-95 as issued by the TIA (A series of performance parameters above and beyond those in TSB-67).

      Bryan

    3. Re:10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by SnapperHead · · Score: 1

      I could have swarn that 100Mbit used more then 4 wires. Either way, if it can use 100Mbit on 4 wires, then you can still run 2 seperate lines via a single cable.

      I agree, there is no reason to run 10Mbit, but you never know. There are plenty of people who still do.

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    4. Re:10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      There are plenty of people who still do [run 10Mb]

      Those are mostly existing installs. If there's no reason to upgrade, then why bother, right?

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    5. Re:10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by mpe · · Score: 2

      I could have swarn that 100Mbit used more then 4 wires.

      There are some old standards for 100M over cat 3 (and worst) which use all 4 pairs. (You'd also need special NICs and hubs to use them anyway).

  100. In 10 years everything will be wireless. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I guess fiber will always be faster but it seems like wireless will be the way to go. I'm sure they'll have good speeds by then.

    Of course, I wonder if sunspots will affect wireless internet?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  101. fire hazard by epine · · Score: 1


    A couple of years ago I was researching acids and that lead to a web page devoted to the tremendous safety hazards involved in handling hydrofluoric acid. A few links later I found a web page that stated that most common cat-5 cable sheathing contains fluorine because they haven't found any good alternatives.

    Plenum rated cable either doesn't contain fluorine or the extra shielding is designed to prevent the emission of fluorine compounds in the event of fire.

    The list of compounds detected during the combustion of cat-5 sheathing looked like something from a chemicals weapons manual. Can't find the link right now. Maybe the Department of the Interior had this information exterminated.

  102. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by dr_apoc · · Score: 3, Informative

    you can only go a few meters with Gigabit over Cat5e before attenuation takes effect. fiber doesnt have this limitation

  103. maybe fibre-up most likely office/utility areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cat-5 everywhere but maybe leave conduit through the most awkward barriers (timber framing, concrete, ) for future easy installations.

  104. I would not bother with fiber. by jmorey · · Score: 1

    I just moved into a home that just had built. I wired each room with several jacks. Each jack has Cat5 for phone, dual Cat6, and dual RG6QS home run to a wiring panel. I think this will set me up for several years to come. I looked into fiber (and could get about one-half of what I needed free) but the other half that I would need to get was two expensive for something that I might never use. But I also figure that can always to go the upper rooms through the attic and the lower rooms through the basement. This way I can add it later if it is needed.

  105. I just went through this... by cmeans · · Score: 2, Informative
    Put conduit in. One box per wall per room. Make sure you've got big enough pipes, an even distribution of the pipes through the walls, and a home-run room (or whatever they call it) where everything can come together nicely. (Ours is in the mud room.)

    That way you can change the cabling, and easily add more as the occasions arise.

    I have Cat5E running through-out the house. The only rooms I didn't wire were the bathrooms, and I already regret it.

  106. My renovations by angry_beaver · · Score: 1

    Much of my experience is the same as some of the other posters but I thought I'd share anyways.
    We're currently in the process of renovating a 100 year old house. Part of the process has been gutting the house down to the studs, re-insulating, upgrading electrical and drywalling. I have been going a little extreme given my geek nature. Every outlet that gets put in is accompanied by an empty box that has conduit running to the attic, or the basement. I'm not pulling any wire now, but this leaves the option to put any device almost anywhere. I can use these empty boxes to pull the wiring for my surround channels. I can use it for data wiring, more electrical wiring, telephone wiring, home automation, etc...

    Basically, my 2cents is - Use Conduit. As soon as you pull in all your cat5 and coax, there's going to be a new standard or a new innovation in fiber or something that is going to cause all your work to be useless. The only nearly sure thing is conduit.

  107. And it looks like shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people actually have good taste, mind you.

  108. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by bmoyles · · Score: 2, Informative

    Plenum graded, iirc, actually means that were it to catch fire, its shielding and outer casing is made of a material that won't release toxic fumes into the airway (which often runs along the plenum--the space between the real ceiling and the drop ceilings found in many offices).

  109. How Far? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a good question actually, I've been pondering on networking myself to my friends house for some time now.

    Just how far will Cat5 or Fibre go between two standart NICs without any form of signal amplification?

    Hope someone replies.

  110. Re:wireless = cheaper? what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    labor?

  111. one word.. by cyplex · · Score: 1



    SPEEDWRAP!!! fiber,data,phone,video

  112. What use is fiber? by David+Leppik · · Score: 1

    I thought about this a few years ago, and despite what people presume is a Moore's Law equivalent for bandwidth, I remain skeptical.

    Assuming a 100BaseT switched network (i.e. one room contains the switch, wires fan out from there), that's 100Mbits/s to each node. Assume about 40% efficiency. What would you use that for? Maybe watching movies-- figure a 5MB/s stream (a lot for MPEG-2)-- that's five simultaneous movies on each computer! And you'll probably be using MPEG-4 in a few years, which makes 5MB/s ludicrous. Mind you, full-screen video conferencing can't compress well, but I still can't imagine it using all that bandwidth.

    There are only two uses I can think of that would need fiber-- real-time volumetric data and transferring really bloated software. I can't think of a household use for volumetric data transfer (if you need it real time you can probably reduce it to video and polygons.) And I'm skeptical that programs you need to transfer all the time will bloat that much.

    Chances are, 90% or more of your network usage will be to and from the outside internet. Thus, you aren't any faster than your ISP. Until you have the equivalent of dedicated fiber to your home-- not just fiber to the neighborhood-- you won't get much use out of fiber within the home. As it is, good old 10Base-T is overkill for DSL or cable. And I don't expect the situation to get any better any time soon.

    So not only aren't there any applications right now that require fiber, there won't be any in the foreseeable future. You're better off taking the money you would spend on fiber, put it in a conservative investment, and spend it when you need fiber. Since applications follow availability, when you have an application for fiber you'll also have really cheap fiber.

    I started wiring my home for Ethernet four years ago. Two years ago Wi-Fi (in the form of Apple's AirPort) came out. I haven't finished wiring, nor do I plan to. Wireless is just too convenient. You don't want to drag cables across the back yard every time you wander around with the laptop.

  113. I am part of a "smart home" wiring company by haledon · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm part of a smart home wiring company (kind of a side-gig for me), and we do this kind of stuff all the time.

    Here is my suggestion: Get 4 boxes of Cat5e wiring, and tell your electrician to run all 4 bundles at once. NO phone, no fiber, no nothing else. You can (easily) use the Cat5e as phone wiring, and if you're going to pull cable, why not pull a bundle of 4, as opposed to a "bundle" of one.

    From there, you'll want to have someone (I don't know whether you feel comfortable doing it) set up a termination site at the home run, probably somewhere in the basement. That is where all your phone lines will converge, and any rack/patch panel system will go up.

    Now, if I were you, I'd have all 4 data drops wired with ports that can accept phone or data lines (RJ45 or RJ11 lines). You can get that kind of equipment from Home Depot.

    For ease of use, I would also suggest using 2 colors, when running your wire. Maybe, for example, red for the phone (which, remember, has the CAPABILITY to double as data, if you want), and white for all the data. That will make it easier to keep track of what is what later on.

    BTW, I would invest in a good cable crimper set, and a line-testing set as well. You can probably pick up both @ Home Depot, but I would suggest going to a local GrayBar if I were you.

    Now, with regard to cost, from our experience, doing the cabling before the dry wall goes up is about 1/3 to 1/4 as expensive as snaking wiring later on. Not only that, but it's also a MUCH, MUCH easier thing to do.

    I have seen a few comments regarding the running of other types of media.. that's really up to you. You might want to, at a minimum, run cable/audio, and speaker wiring. Again, if you're electrician is going to be running wire, it's just as simple to run a bundle of 4 wires as it is to run a bundle of 6 (4 data, 1 audio/video, 1 speaker.)

    If he trys to charge you more, tell him to get lost and just run the wiring yourself. If you take that route, then really, all you're looking at is an incremental cost of.. less than a few hundred bucks (relatvie to the cost of a new home, several hundred THOUSAND dollars), which is nothing, and a few hours of your time. The end result is a home with (theoretically) a higher value, since it's "wired and smart home ready".

    Now, regarding fiber... several home owners have asked us whether we would do fiber for them. The truth of the matter is that it's just too expensive for residential use. Not only that, but as a residential user, you likely won't need the power that fiber gives you. Your broadband connection will be the limiting factor, and I doubt that you'll be transferring files too large for standard Cat5e wiring to handle quickly. Not only that, but installing fiber requires more time, and is definitely not something the "do it yourselfer" should try.. not unless you've got a LOT of patience!

    On a side note.. as ironic as it would sound, the vast number of clients that our company takes on end up wiring the house... then installing a wireless network. Go figure.

    Either way, though, I would highly recommend running a bundle of data lines through the house. It's a solid investment.

    Please note that I have made it a point to leave my company's name out of this discussion. I wanted to make sure I came off as helpful, and not opportunistic. If you have any further questions, or want to know more, email me (jyamisha@hotmail.com) and I'll be more than happy to write more.

    --
    i want to live life, not just go through the motions
    1. Re:I am part of a "smart home" wiring company by renehollan · · Score: 2

      I just wish your company (and others in the biz) would bash on the heads of homebuilders. They are SOOO in the 1960s when it comes to prewiring, and the costs are insignificant compared to the rest of the house (yeah, I know they count every penny like auto manufacturers, but geez, ethernet to each room is practically a necessity today).

      --
      You could've hired me.
  114. Energy Management, Alarm, and other sensors by imrdkl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps going a bit off topic, but, one other thing to think about, before you sheetrock, is deployment of sensors for eventual energy management (smart-house) systems, and fire/burglar alarms and intrusion-avoidance systems. Typically, these systems require shielded 1 or 2 pair leads to analog boards which then convert to digital and feed the controller. Having these planned and at least the wire in place can save unsightly wires on the wall later.

  115. Fiber... BAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fiber if fine if you are going to have large amounts of AGREGATE traffic, but for a home lan, Cat 5 is fine.

    I did a test at my office once. Rateshapped users down at the switch port. Went from 100 Mbits/sec to 1 Mbits/sec before most of them noticed.

    The moral of the story is that unless you are a server, you don't need 10 Mbits/sec, much less, 100.

    Buy fiber and all you are paying for is bragging rights. Connected it to DSL or Cable LAN and watch people who know networks laugh. There's the bottleneck, and little you can do about it. Better off buying dedicated bandwidth from a reputable ISP and wire with Cat 5 than to waste money on Fiber.

  116. Run conduit by The+Bastard · · Score: 1

    If this is a new house, and the cabling hasn't
    been run yet, is to use conduit. That way, you can run shielded cable, and then move to fiber without ripping the walls apart. Check the building code in your area, also; some places require cables to be stapled to the wall beams
    (as it is in my house).

  117. Get an IBM Home Director Panel by tRoll+with+Butter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.homedirector.com/

    Use ALL CAT5 (no "standard" POTS lines) for phone and data, and RG-6 quadshield for satellite/cable TV connections. Have it all terminate at the Home Director box... Congradulations, you can now rewire any jack in the house to do whatever you want from one single location.

    This is how most of the new homes built in central FL are now wired.

    --

    ---
    Siggy, siggy, siggy, can't you see? Sometimes your puns just irritate me.
    1. Re:Get an IBM Home Director Panel by jjohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

      I built a house a year ago in Oak Creek, Wisconsin (just south of Milwaukee), and had it done by IBM Home Director. Four drops to each bedroom (1 RG6, 3 CAT5), two to the living room (RG6 and CAT5) and two to the kitchen (2 CAT5), all terminated in a box in the basement, with no POTS lines, and I'm totally happy.

      The Home Director panel houses my Time/Warner cable connection, which is both digital cable and RoadRunner, so my cable modem is in there, hooked up to a Linksys 8 port cable/dsl router (which provides DHCP to my network). The phone lines and cable lines terminate at simple splitters in the box; the network lines in the router.

      It's clean and nearly effortless. Plug a phone in, and it's set; plug a computer into a network port, and it's on the network with a proxyless broadband connection. When I built a room in the basement, I added six drops to it (RG6 and 5 CAT5) just as easily.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  118. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

    Err... At least the last tiem I looked into Plenum grade cable it came in UTP & STP... Of course STP I've seen lately is also limited to CAT3 (unless you know of some strange place that claims better)... On top of that Plenum's only advantage is when it catches on fire it doesn't give off highly caustic smoke...

    So all in all, since you've not been right on much of what you said I don't think he should listen all that muc to your suggestion...

    --
    we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  119. You Don't *KNOW* What You Need. by dew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's the straight-up truth. You don't know what you need 10 years from now! Neither does anybody else in this forum. 5 or 10 years down the pipe, you're going to want to drop in some new cabling/communications wiring, right? Maybe you will want to run audio/video cables through the walls like one poster suggested. But the point is not to NOW lay every single possible cable you'd want. What you want to do is to future-proof your house.

    In my opinion, the best way to do that is to use conduit. Conduit will let you easily drop in new cables to your house's framework. That way, just drop in your cat 5e and telephone wiring now, and then, as you need it, drop in other transport media.

    I might caution you as to using long-haul analog cabling media, like stereo RCA - long, straight wires make excellent antennas and the audio quality by the time it actually got to your speakers would be undoubtedly subpar. If you have the money, running something like optical S/PDIF would make more sense, as it's digital and won't lose signal quality over the kind of runs you're likely to have in your house.

    Good luck, and kudos on putting together a fabulous new home!

    --

    David E. Weekly
    Code / Think / Teach / Learn
    h4x0r for

  120. Something You might have overlooked by rveno1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    of Course it is a no brainer to wire your house with cat5e (in fact when my dad redid our house 8 years ago he made sure they installed cat5)

    But from another perspective AFTER you wire the house (and before the drywall is up) run through your house with a CAMCORDER and record where all the wires are placed this will become an invaluable resource when you have to do expansion!

    1. Re:Something You might have overlooked by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But from another perspective AFTER you wire the house (and before the drywall is up) run through your house with a CAMCORDER and record where all the wires are placed this will become an invaluable resource when you have to do expansion!

      No, don't use a camcorder. Use a camera (digital or film), get prints, and *organize them into a notebook*. Clearly label each page, ("Dining room, South") etc.. Make notes on each page as to what kinds of cable are where. Update the notebook after construction is complete as to what box is hooked to what cable.

      Hardcopy prints properly stored last for decades, and the specs on the MK1 eyeball won't change in that timeframe either. (Hardcopy notebooks can also be easily transferred to the next owner with no compatibility problems.)

  121. wireless + my experience. by psychalgia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    look, ive doen this to two differnet houses. Its going to cost you a LOT less to do wireless. Just take the plunge...that wired shit is going to be antiquated as hell in a few years.

    --

    ________________________________________________

    1. Re:wireless + my experience. by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      look, ive doen this to two differnet houses. Its going to cost you a LOT less to do wireless. Just take the plunge...that wired shit is going to be antiquated as hell in a few years.

      Just as long as the frequencies don't get jammed up by people with the same idea and you don't mind broadcasting your net (and having it easily jammable).

      Oh, and the whole cheaper to interface wires than get fancy RF cards when the standards take another notch up.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:wireless + my experience. by psychalgia · · Score: 1

      i feel that the less cards needed would justify the more wires needed approach on a 6 bedroom house...whatever, lines are antiquated, not worth wasting your time on anymore...

      --

      ________________________________________________

  122. A few more cat5 suggestions by Spinality · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Lots of good comments here. I have nothing to add about the fiber/UTP question, other than it might be a little premature to drop fiber everywhere; but here are some other UTP notes from my experience:

    Consider using a modular connector system like this one. I saved a lot of time and hassle using them and the result looks great. You can also intermix CATV, voice, data etc. however you like.

    Use a star from a cable closet (could be a cabinet in your garage or next to the water heater, doesn't matter). Consider running everything to a patch panel. If you don't want to spring for the connectors etc. of a patch panel, at least create a 'virtual patch panel' where every circuit is tagged and accessible. Leave good documentation in the cabinet 'cause you'll forget what goes where.

    Follow the Cat5 specs: minimal bends, minimal tension when pulling cable, loose cable ties, no regular tie intervals, cross AC power perpendicularly and rarely. Pick the cabling spec you'll use and stick to it. Avoid doing what I had to do: running voice on the unused two pairs of my 100Mbs data circuits (even though I've had zero problems).

    Be sure you have power near your drops and plenty of power and some shelf space in your closet. You'll be terminating your outside internet connectivity here as well (DSL, cable modem, etc.) so be sure to plan space accordingly for routers, console connections, hubs, UPS, etc.

    See the remarks elsewhere here about using plenum cable if you're not installing conduit. But conduit would let you use fiber or other more advanced media in the future.

    Invest in some cheap test equipment so you can verify continuity, correct pinouts, etc. in all your cables.

    HTH -- Spiny

    --
    -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
  123. Draw Wires by aquisgrana · · Score: 1
    One idea is to run the cable you know you need now, and also leave a draw wire in place so you can pull in whatever you want when you need it. This avoids spending money now on fibre you may not use...or you may want a different type.

    It's usually not too hard doing this stuff in a single story building, especially if everything is new and clean, since you can just run everything in the roof space, or sometimes the floor if it is not a concrete pad. But certainly it is much easier to provide holes down inside the walls now than to add them later. Then leave a piece of wire down it to use to draw whatever you want in later. Just keep a record of what you have where!

  124. Where are the Brazil panels? by michaelmalak · · Score: 2

    Why hasn't someone come out with a wall system like in the movie Brazil, where 2 ft square panels are removable? It would not only be good for wiring, but also for inserting surround speakers and hallway data-screen terminals.

  125. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by seney · · Score: 1

    also -

    CM - non-plenum
    CMP - plenum

    but, if you're running your cable thru conduit the whole way then CMP is not required in regards to fire protection. cat5e isn't gigabit, it's about 120 MB/s instead of 100 for plain old cat5. gigabit is sold by lucent, and they refer to it as cat6. i'm not sure if the standard has been stamped out just yet though.

  126. cat7 by lposeidon · · Score: 0

    research cat7. you can do VoIP.
    http://www.siemon.com/

    if u have the cash put fiber, but dont forget about the fiber switches.
    1. are you gonna have fiber NICs in you computers or 10/100/1000 NICs.
    2. i want a tour one u get all this set up. :)

    --
    Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
  127. A few considerations by Manuka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since this is new construction, go the extra mile and feed each data outlet with some sort of conduit (PVC, EMT, or flexible). That way, when you want to upgrade or expand, it's a no-brainer and you don't have to rip things apart. EMT conduit has the added bonus of providing RF shielding to your copper cabling, provided it's properly grounded (which it should be). This also gives you the advantage of only needing to put in the plumbing before you put up the sheetrock, and then running the actual wire later.

    Also, Leviton makes a very nice modular structured media system that allows you to do neat things like audio and video distribution in addition to phone and data - they have modular patch panels that make it very easy to do.

    Lastly, whatever you do, TAKE PICTURES of everything you do before you put the sheetrock up - you'll want them for reference when you make changes later.

    1. Re:A few considerations by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      pictures . . .

      You know, that is one of the best ideas I have heard of for running cable! I bet that saves lots of hassles for trying to remember all of the details about the install!

      Fortunately for me, I have a crawl space under my house (one story with no basement) so running cable is rediculously easy. I just loosely staple it to the wood beans under the floor. I only ran cable between two rooms so the distance was only ~30 feet.

      robi

  128. For what? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I can't imagine what a single AV channel running through the walls could be used for. Obviously you're going to want to have Coax for broadcast/cable channels (to be selected individualy in the diffrent rooms). But really, what good would it do to have one global broadcast to the whole house?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:For what? by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      But really, what good would it do to have one global broadcast to the whole house?

      For the video camera you've rigged to point at people standing at the front door? My uncle did that in his new house, it's spiffy.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  129. What about those 3com wallplates? by t0qer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't you read slashdot everyday? Shame on you if you don't!

    Just a few weeks ago there was this article about 3com faceplates. You can consolidate all your phone and data into 1 jack while running just 1 cable run to your rooms. Now if you got money to burn, you might consider one of these babies from Cisco. This is their media convergence server which will combine voice/data/video into something that can run over cat5. A MCS will cut out your need to run separate phone and video lines. Hey want to hire me to set this stuff up? I'm totally jobless right now and could really use the money :) Good luck on your house!

  130. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by stealthyburrito · · Score: 1

    You can get UTP or STP cable that's rated CMP (communications plenum, aka "plenum cable") or CMR (communications riser, aka "PVC cable").

    Really, the only difference between the two is the outer insulation on plenum cable is supposed to give off less visible smoke when set on fire. This is important if the plenum area in a ceiling is used for a air return, and you don't want your HVAC system recirculating blinding smoke.
    However, in a house, I doubt this is the case. Your HVAC will be getting fresh air from your in-air vent. If the house were to catch on fire, smoke from your furniture and carpet would kill you before the CAT5e cable would. Plus, if you're running the cable in conduit anyway, where's the advantage of spending extra $ on CMP?

    Check out these links for standards info:
    http://www.diamondwireandcable.com/techtips/necf la meratings.pdf

    http://www2.superioressex.com/techinfo/plenumvsp vc .pdf

  131. Cheaper Alternative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think current fiber prices are $5+ per meter (and you'll need a pair of them!), which will make this a fairly expensive wiring job. However, you should consider running an *empty* conduit for future expansion for when fiber is a bit cheaper...

    Untill then, get yourself a good non-blocking switch, I'm sure you'll be pleased with the performance...

  132. LinkSys's EG0008 is not $189. by dew · · Score: 2

    I think you confused your products. The LinkSys switch with 8 ports all gigabit, the EG0008, as an MSRP of $1400 and is selling on the street for about $850. That's not $189.

    --

    David E. Weekly
    Code / Think / Teach / Learn
    h4x0r for

    1. Re:LinkSys's EG0008 is not $189. by demaria · · Score: 1

      My mistake. It's an 8 port switch with one gigabit port. I misread the press release.

  133. Specific cool use of fiber by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2
    Passive fiber links let you use IR remote controls anywhere in the house. A friend of mine has his stereo (totally IR controlled) in the basement. He dropped a fiberoptic line from a modified doorbell bracket in the living room, down to a terminus right in front of the stereo's photocell. Result: aim the remote control at the decorative bracket in the living room, and you can control the invisible stereo. Surprisingly nice to have such an inobtrusive install.

    What amazed me is that nonterminated cable is just fine for that purpose! He literally just fished the glass (and cladding) through the wall and mounted it in brackets at each end.

  134. Conduit by TBC · · Score: 1

    Consider stubing conduit boxes from each room into the basement or atic. If finishing the basement, put in a suspended celing. Then if/when you need something different, it's very easy to pull new wire in without pulling out walls, etc. You might want to consider boxes in multiple walls for larger rooms. It's a cheap simple way to make your life easier in the future.

    Dan

  135. Run strings or wire with the cables, leave them in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    When you run the cables, also run fishing lines, wires, or strings, and leave it in place with the cables.


    If, later, you need to run fiber, you can use a string to pull the fiber through along the same path.

  136. Vi(m) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vi(m) is the crappiest applications ever written! even worse than windoze!(!(!(!(!(!)))))))



    Its unstable, impossible to use and only geekazoids and nerdasaureses use it, and even they like emacs better!



    SO FUCK VI(M), delete it, rip it in to a 1,000,000 pieces and join the anti vi(m) world (and that is like 99.9999% of the world) FUCK VI(M)

  137. wiring by satmech · · Score: 1

    Check http://www.centralite.com/... I've seen their demo. Really Nice!

  138. if you really want value... by wmeyer · · Score: 1

    If you really want value, as well as protection from technological obsolescence, have them run conduit for the data lines. That way, you can shoot cat-5 now, and fibre later (or whatever comes along). Moreover, I shudder at the thought of an electrician handling fibre , not to mention the hassle of repairing a failed cable of any sort, once the wallboard is up.

    --
    --- Bill
  139. Plans I have for my parents house by KjetilK · · Score: 2
    I have been thinking about issues like this and I'll be very interested in what comes of this.

    My parents live in a largish appartment, in a small complex with 30 similar appartments. There is some money around, so I was thinking about building a LAN there. A lot have to be digged down into the ground, and I have been thinking about persuading these people to dig down fiber. Around here, it isn't that infeasible getting fiber all the way.

    When thinking about bandwidth, I've been thinking along these lines: If bandwidth is more expensive than CPU, then compression will be common, if CPU is more expensive than bandwidth, things will be transmitted with little or no compression. And this may change quite rapidly, so what is the application I can think of that I might realistically see that takes the most bandwidth? Uncompressed HDTV. And that is, AFAIK, 1.45 Gbits/s, right? I know of no copper that can do that. It stops at about 1.2 Gbits/s, right? So, if we take the expense of digging something down, it can't be copper.

    Inside the house, I have planned go get a diskless old box with a Fibrechannel card and use as router and firewall. Then, making conduits inside the house so that other cables can be replaced with not too much effort. From the router in the basement, I'll have a standard copper cable, cat5 or whatever to the server, which is a box that will run whatever I need of e-mail, web, the lot. Then, there will be a similar cable to the main workstation. Finally, there will be a cable to the TV.

    Other than that, I'll base it on wireless. People here have voiced concerns about security, and indeed, it must be made in such a way that the firewall isn't made pointless. But putting a lot of wire when you can use Bluetooth (which has been my primary choice, but I don't know), or 802.11 seems a complete waste. You can't wire all the gadgets I want anyway (I want the fridge online! And the washing machine, and the... :-) ) so most things must be on wireless anyway. However, with Bluetooth, I need at least two points in the house, so obviously I need cables from the router in the basement to the points where the senders and transmitters are.

    OK, these weren't advices, just a few loose thoughts, but I figured I'd share them.

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    1. Re:Plans I have for my parents house by mpe · · Score: 2

      My parents live in a largish appartment, in a small complex with 30 similar appartments. There is some money around, so I was thinking about building a LAN there. A lot have to be digged down into the ground, and I have been thinking about persuading these people to dig down fiber

      Unless the distances involved are greater than the 100m limit for CAT then there probably isn't much point installing fibre. However when you dig you install ductwork so you can always replace cable later on...

  140. You can't Plan Ahead by nuintari · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My expiriance with wiring from the ground up is that you cannot plan for everything. You'll always think of something else that you wanna do with your existing scheme, and need to pull more wire. So conduits are the only option.

    As for fiber, I've never had to pay for it, but I've had to work with it. Its not worth the effort to use it, go high quality cat-5, and if ya want, then ya can go GigE. I'm told fiber is cheap to buy, expensive, and hard to run, and the hardware to talk over it is murderously expensive. But maybe even the cable itself is expensive, I dunno, used it, don't like it, don't wanna think about paying for it.

    Conduits, and loads of them, will make your life easier, and will greatly improve the value of your home, wish my house had conduits, but mine predates WW2..... and has power consumtion issues. *cries*

    As for what to put in the cables, its whatever ya wanna do with it. Me, right now, I;d run s-video, cat5, and coax, and maybe whatever the current "buzz" cable type is, and at least 4 outlets in each small room, 6 to 8 in big rooms. Else, your wife/significant other will go mad when she can't move the TV. And put em fairly close to your electrical outlets, so ya can just take all your cables that are close together, and tie em together with zip ties, and make the mess behind your euipment a little more pleassent.

    --

    --Nuintari

    slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    1. Re:You can't Plan Ahead by ivrcti · · Score: 1

      >>"just take all your cables that are close together, and tie em together with zip ties, and make the mess behind your euipment a little more pleassent." Some folks will take you literally, and zip in the power cord for their PC/monitor, etc. The of course, they won't be pleasent as they try and figure out where all the cross-talk is coming from.

    2. Re:You can't Plan Ahead by nuintari · · Score: 2

      Oy yeah, maybe I should mentioned that power and data don't mix.

      I shoul;d hed my own advice, the giant knot bwehind ym amchiens takes me back to my boyscout days everytime try to move it.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  141. Re:Bunch of :) by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    :) It's hard to read such emotional posts :)

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  142. ra few more tips by xah · · Score: 2, Informative
    A lot of good comments. Here are some points that haven't been thoroughly addressed.

    Running the fiber will increase the value of your house. That might make it worth doing even if you never use it.

    While running conduit is a good alternative to fiber, do not use metal conduit. It hurts cable performance.

    Placing a single CAT-5 cable in 1" metal conduit resulted in degradation of return loss, attenuation and near-end crosstalk (NEXT), three key indicators of cable performance. The cable in the tests was still within specification, but was worse in all cases when placed in conduit. Capacitive coupling between the conduit and the cable was believed to be responsible. (LINK)

    If you run shielded twisted pair, or STP, instead of the usual unshielded twisted pair, or UTP, you need to ground it properly. See for example this link .

    Consult your fire codes and follow them. You might need to install plenum cable in certain spaces. When in doubt, install plenum.

    Whatever cable you run, leave lots of slack on each end. This is cheap insurnace against a cable problem.

    Try to adhere to a standard when you install the cable, such as EIA/TIA-568 for Ethernet.

    If you are worried about Echelon type spying, you will need to run fiber and take other precautions.

    --
    I am not a lawyer. Do not take my words as legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney.
  143. CAT5 _is_ your phone cable by LordNimon · · Score: 2
    Don't run separate phone and cat5 cables, because cat5 can be used to carry phone signals (4 lines to be exact). Just run at least two cat5 cables to each room, and then you can wire each one to be a phone line or a network connection.

    Also, don't forget to make sure that your data cables (cat5, rg6, whatever) are always at least 6" away from the power cables.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  144. 1. run conduit 2. cable=cheap plugs/hubs=expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what i read, the cabling standards are supposed to be
    good for about 5 years. Then they figure the tech. will have changed
    so much that theres no chance to know what to do.

    So one solution is to run conduit. This will survive whatever
    new cabling technology will come through (however note it will be a total waste if suddenly everything is wireless...).
    But it will also make anything you have to do at all to your cabling
    including diagnosing problems, replacing, etc, a whole lot easier. you wont have to rip
    up any drywall at all you just pull apart the conduit at strategic places (you can get it that plugs together loosely) and
    pull the old cable out. then put a 'cable snake' ( 50 bucks ) thru and pull your new cables. Note this is also potentially alot more secure if your cables run through any 'high traffic' areas at all in your walls/ceilings.

    i have read that fiber is 'the next thing' but good luck
    finding alot of fiber-capable network cards, wall plugs etc. which brings me to my next point
    cabling is a miniscule percentage of the money you have to spend to put in a network.
    each drop you need will, depending on if you care about things like
    whether your installation can withstand kids pulling on the
    cables, or mom running her vacuum over the cable and 'JERK'. if you awnt to stop that you will need some
    sort of electrical boxish type thing nailed to the studs
    in your wall. You then put the drywall over that
    while cutting out a hole for it (just like w a light switch or
    power plug etc). then you put your face plate on that. but you will have to buy a special
    face plat for network stuff. and you will have to buy special cat5 female plugs
    to stick in this face plate. and unless you are getting 'self-terminating' type of plugs, you will
    need to buy some kind of 'punch down tool' to terminate your ethernet
    cable into the plugs. these can be from 10 bucks to 100 bucks depending on if you are lucky
    enough to find a place that sells cheap little plastic ones.

    now, what about your 'wiring closet' where your ethernet all comes together?
    if you do fiber maybe you wont need this.

    but if you arent using fiber you will need a couple things:
    rj45 crimper to crimp some plugs on the end of your ethernet cable. crimpers can be from 30 for a cheap one that will break if you use it too hard,
    to 200 bucks and up for steel ones with replacable 'crimpers' that snap into the handle.
    then you will need a hub or two. but guess what? hubs take power.
    so you will have to route some power to your wiring closet.
    and if its really a 'closet' you probably want a light bulb in there too.
    now think about the safety of lights in closets,
    power plugs distance from ceilings, etc. you sure you can DIY and keep your house from catching on fire?
    oh yeah, dont forget that if you put your wiring closet on the same circuit as another circuit in your house,
    you need to add up all the wattage and figure out how much is 'left over'for your wiring closet.
    and then guess if youa re going to add stuff into that closet in the future like maybe a cablemodem
    or a dsl-whatever. maybe more hubs? now, with all that
    youre going to need more than one power plug. youll need more than two in face, so how are you going to do that?
    get a power strip or get a bunch more plugs?

    oh yeah, and since you are just now considering this
    AFTER youve done the phone line, it probably means
    you havent thought about it at all and will need to
    rip up / drill through some of the boards etc.

    oh PS dont forget, dont route your ethernet within so-and-so inches (i think its around 3 feet) of any gigantic electrical motors like
    attic fans or ceiling fans. and then there are the fluorescent lightbulbs and etc.
    if you get your cables too close you will get EM interference and then your cables will not give you 'trouble free' performance.

    oh yeah, dont forget to spend a couple hundred bucks getting
    all this fancy cat5e cable tested and rated to 1000Mbps to make sure it actually runs
    at that speed. what? you dont want to do that? ok, then
    just ftp a couple files at 100Mbps and say 'well, it works pretty good.'

    as you can see, the price of cabling itself is
    a miniscule amount. the crimper alone could potentially cost more than the cable.
    cat5 female wallplate sockets can be 3 to 7 bucks, each. how many drops were you going to do again?
    congrats, your wall sockets will cost more than the cable.

    and good luck finding any of this stuff anywhere unless
    you live in a big city. this city of 1million people (metro area) has
    2 places to get it, one an obscure electronics shop and the other
    is 'home depot' and all their stuff is behind gigantic metal cages that are locked away from customers.

  145. How bout making the house changeable. by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

    I think, instead of trying to think of all things in advance, I'd try to make my house more easily rewireable. Think about putting conduits to the ceiling at reasonable places, patches, tubes in the floor somehow accessible.

    I can't imagine what the best practices are for this but I'd bet somebody's figured it out before. Then you're not stuck with whatever you think of now. That would be *really* cool.

  146. Re:Phone wire?!?? - beware by indigo78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The company where I was employed one year ago had shared plugs for ethernet and phone. They set up every plug in the wall according to their needs. This could be very good, since it gave all the things a good modularity, but they had lots of problems (mainly about performance on the ethernet side). I can't tell you whether this problem was related to the shared plugs or to the ethernet structure. I know nothing about how this could have been done (except that they didn't use Voice over IP). Just be warned about possible problems of this solution...

    --
    I'm fat, you're ugly. I can get slimmer, and you?
  147. Why not have the electrician do the CAT5 by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

    The electrician is already running wire .. in many/most cases the wire is going to terminate close to the electrical drops *anyway* so he can do the CAT5 while he's doing the electric and phone. Hell, he's probably better at it than you are anyway. If you take into account how valuable your time is .. it's probably cheaper and easier to let him do his damn job.

    I haven't done a house this way - but I DID wire a 20 person office this way. The electrician did a competant job of running CAT5 to where I wanted it, and I had the network guys come in and fix up the punchdown and patch panel to spec, then test the pairs. Worked fine.

    You *might* consider (since you're still a-building) putting some kind of ductwork for future expansion.

    --
    Display some adaptability.
    1. Re:Why not have the electrician do the CAT5 by philipsblows · · Score: 1

      I've asked a couple of people about this, and they all say the same thing:

      Do not get the electrician to do the low voltage wiring. End of discussion.

      This is for residential projects, where I guess the population of electricians is not wise to the ways of wiring for ethernet and whatnot. Wiring high and low voltage at the same time (possibly close to each other for reduced labor) might get you a bunch of noise from the 110 lines (or even 220 lines).

      I don't know either way, but it is something to consider. I would suggest checking to see that an electrician has some knowledge or, more importantly, experience with LV wiring to make sure you don't find problems after move-in (which undoes all the convenience of wiring before drywall).

    2. Re:Why not have the electrician do the CAT5 by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      I've heard it both ways. Sometimes it's easier to have the electrician do it, sometimes to have the lan wiring specialist do the job.

      I've both types screw up the wiring.

      In my case, due to the odd-ball factor of my new office, it was easier to have the electrican do the job, and cheaper. Odd-ball? No false/drop ceilings in the suite - all hard plaster. No pre-existing wiring, save for two drops that looked like they were punched with a screwdriver. The suite's existing walls were being taken out anyway, and conduit laid in, so Joe Electrician ran them, and did a good job.

      Heck, you should see the suite on the other side of the building .. garden tub in the courtyard, murphy bed, dance floor ...

      --
      Display some adaptability.
  148. Not cat5, not fiber: CONDUIT! by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    I wired every room with two runs of cat5: one for telephone, one for data. I ran conduit to a few rooms. The conduit has proven much more valuable than the cat5. And given the expense of terminating and testing every run, it would have been much cheaper to run conduit (NMT aka smurf tubing) to every room.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  149. Its not as hard as you think by Dirt1 · · Score: 1

    As long as the cable isn't hooked to anything behind the walls, its not hard to upgrade the wiring. If you can get to the attic, I say run the wires straight up, then over to whatever central location you have. Use cat5 now, and label both sides so you know what wire goes where. Also, don't tie them together until they are out side the wall. That way, if you want to upgrade your wiring later, you can tie the new wire to the old wire and pull it through very easily. Fiber is way too expensive right now comparedto cat5. I've helped a lot of guys at work wire their houses, and that is the easiest way.

  150. RJ-45 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wor
    or
    wgr
    bl
    wbl
    gr
    wbr
    br

  151. cat5 + power by WoofLu · · Score: 1

    I am planning to do some work in my house too, I'd just like to know if it would be allright to put shielded cat5 cables running next to 220V cables (+phone+cable+sound+obiwan kenobi) ?

    1. Re:cat5 + power by renehollan · · Score: 2
      In a word: NO!.

      You want to keep such runs at leastr 12" apart, cross them at 90 degree angles when necessary, and only bring them close in a split multi-ganged box (if your code permits that).

      --
      You could've hired me.
  152. Cable Ratings/Conduit by Millard+Fillmore · · Score: 1

    I agree with several other posters - use conduit, it'll make your life much easier. Keep it away from high voltage runs, and use CAT5E for your phone and data lines, all going to a patch panel in the basement/wherever.

    Rather than fibre, you might try running Cat6 - it would be cheaper.

    Make sure if you're not using conduit that you use plenum rated cable - it's more expensive, but then having your house burn down would suck more. Also, make sure you don't kink the cable in any of the wallspaces.

    Last piece of advice - contractors these days are hip to this stuff, so talk to your GC about this. Tell him about your upgrade and management concerns, and see what he thinks. I'm sure the electrical contractor can do your runs for you, and you'll probably be happier in the long run (no pun intended).

  153. Cat-5 for phones works very well. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    I use Cat-5 for telephone lines, and it works very well.

    Be SURE that each telephone line is on two wires that are a twisted pair. If you run telephone lines on wires that are in adjacent pairs, you will get terrible crosstalk.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  154. No need for expensive Fiber by Density_Altitude · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many comments suggests using fishing wire to pull the cables into conduits etc.

    My advise is that this is a good idea, but once you've finished with pulling copper leave the fishing wire there and voila, you've got a cheap optical fiber ready to go!

    I'd say use around 20 pounds tested wires to get a clean signal ;-)

    --
    delete free(system.gc);
  155. phone lines aint low voltage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but they are low current.
    and the newer ones are twisted pair.

    thats why i read it was ok to string eth
    right alongside them.

  156. Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going strictly for ethernet, screw wiring. Just use wireless. 802.11b is available freely, 802.11a is also available if you need more bandwidth.

  157. Cheapest solution by pepper_pusher · · Score: 0

    Hire a 15 y.o. kid and pay him to move the TV, bring you the phone, copy from pc to pc using floppys and pay him per hour the minimum wage for a 15y.o. in your country. The kid will be very happy, it's a great job! I do it all the time (hire them, not work for ppl) ;->

    --
    girl
  158. Got evicted? Living with the parents again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got evicted? Living with the parents again? Perhaps this article could be redone as "Moving back into the womb with a bag full of access points, hubs and switches: wiring the place up right" or... "Liberating your parents with Wireless Ethernet"

  159. fiber in your cereal, not your walls by medina · · Score: 1

    Screw fiber; copper is here to stay for quite a bit more. Just be sure that you've left lead lines everywhere you run the cat5 to the jack, so if you ever want to add more (or anything else that's been suggested here), you don't have to kick a wall in our use the cat5 for lead.

    Of course there's always the wireless alternative...

  160. Don't worry too much - wireless is to come by akc · · Score: 1

    My first thought when seeing this topic was to suggest putting in big conduit and then you can change what you want to do later.

    But thinking some more, I realised thats what I did with my phone system - only when I did it 10 years ago it was about putting a phone socket in every room just in case. Now, however, I have a few key phone points around the house and I run many more (far more than I had ever envisaged) phones via digital radio.

    Anyway, you normally can't get the conduit to a simple exposure point in a room - I always had to do something like leave it under the floor boards and then ended up covering it with a fitted carpet that I didn't want to take up.

  161. Short and simple...no to fiber by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

    No, you do not need ANY fiber in a house. At least not any time soon. You will be fine with Cat5e. Depending on what the cable is specced at you whould be able to easily upgrade to a Gigabit system down the road on the same cable. So no, you don't need any expensive fiber equipment.

  162. Who knows what will be used in 10 years by sopwath · · Score: 1

    I would see about having special conduits put in so that in 10 years you can put that fiber in more easily. It'll be cheaper then anyway.

    Maybe in 10 years there'll be some type of warm super conducting wire that we don't know about. Maybe you'll see it in 20 years if you're still in the house. Make it easy to run whatever is best in the future. Can you run voice over fiber? Maybe you'll want digital sound to each room that uses some new wire type....

    The possibilities are endless.

    Stick to CAT5 for now.

    good luck,
    sopwath

  163. Two pairs only. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2

    He's right. 10 and 100 Base-T use two pairs only for all modes of operation.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re:Two pairs only. by tjrw · · Score: 1

      pins 1&2 are one pair, 3&6 are the other.

      Don't ever wire up a cable with (1,2) (3,4), (5,6), (7,8) as pairs if you expect it to work and it;s any kind of length. I found this out the hard way. It has to be (1,2), (3,6), (4,5), and (7,8). Kind of obvious when you know which conductors get used, but rather painful if you don't !

      Just FYI :-)

      Tim

  164. Wireless? by rknop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would run cat-5 cable if I were you. It will be useful for the forseeable future... and who knows what you will want to have run in 10 years? Redo it when the time comes. In the mean time, for a house network, it's hard to imagine 100Mb/s not being sufficient for several years.

    I've run cat-5 cable in two houses. After a few months, you forget how painful it was and are just grateful to have it. In my old house, which was very small, I only wired a couple of rooms, but it was nice once it was there. In the new house, I only wired a single room. I intended to wire several more... but instead got myself a couple of wireless cards. The desktop has a card, and I have a second for the laptop. I run them in Ad-Hoc mode. It's much more convenient this way. I had intended to have lots of drops wired in, so that I could run my laptop in whatever room, but now I can do that with a very minimum of pain. More expensive, yes, but more flexible and much easier to install in the first place.

    (The one wire runs between the room with my desktop and the cable modem, and the room with my Wife's desktop. Since both computers stay in one place all the time, it makes sense to have wires for them. Since my Linux desktop is also the house router, it has three network cards: one for the cable modem, one for the house net, and one wireless card. I have two different private 192.168.x.x subnets in just my one house....)

    -Rob

  165. why fiber? by Wolfger · · Score: 1

    Color me ignorant, but does fiber have any advantage over 5e, except for the fact that fiber is (virtually) impervious to EM noise? If not, then why bother? A properly run cable inside a house should never have a noise problem to speak of, unless you are big into experimenting with HVAC devices...

    If you are worried about what you will want 5-10 years from now, don't waste your time. 5-10 years from now, we'll be networking with things you never even thought of before.

  166. Ten Years from now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll probably running high-speed/secure wireless and it will cost you less then than running fibre will now.

  167. Raised Flooring by zmalone · · Score: 1

    And don't forget to put extra high ceilings into at least one room, so that you can accomadate large racks and raised flooring later...

  168. forget the phone wire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    As others have mentioned, forget running the phone wire. I just had my home built a year ago, and I ran 2 cat5e runs to each room (4 in my den) and 2 co-ax. I have a cat5 patch panel (I recommend NORDX) in my laundry room where all the cat5e runs terminate. When the phone company installed my main phone line I had them wire a single jack also into the laundry room.

    Now with the patch panel, I just jumpered 6 of the unused ports (24 port patch panel) and patched one of these ports to the phone jack.

    Now any cat5 port in the house can be either A) Patched to my 100mbit switch or B) Patched to the remaining 5 ports which are jumpered to the phone line. I can change them on the fly in seconds using regular cat5 patch cables.

    Total cost was under $500 Canadian for the cat5e, white dual port face plates (also NORDX), RG6 and patch panel - plus the eletrician helped me with the runs before the gyproc went up. I'd like to have conduit, but that would have driven the costs and time to implement up considerably.

    Cheers from Newfoundland, Canada

  169. Bevaducts and bandwidth by MisterMo · · Score: 1
    Actually, the duct in the floor is for after the beer, isn't it? A gravity-fed system in the ceiling better seems like the right approach for supplying the stuff...

    Wireless is the way to go. In ten years time, there will be enough wireless bandwidth to do all of those things that you think you might want to do...including synchronizing those 47 different multimedia streams that will comprise the infrastructure for SlashSurround(TM).

    --

    42

  170. FutureLogic Cable from.... by crustyjeff · · Score: 1

    www.signaturewire.com is one cable with two Cat-5E, two Coax and Two multi mode fiber channels.

  171. Gigabit over copper. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

    Hi definition uncompressed video is more than 100Mb/sec - but 1Gb/sec over copper is on the horizon.

    Gigabit ethernet, at least, is fairly cheap right now. Check dlink's site for a fair idea of what pricing is like.

    Gigabit will run over standard cat-5 cable (it actually just runs slower signals in parallel over multiple pairs), so you won't even have to rewire for it.

    The problem is hubs. I have yet to see a good gigabit hub for under $2k or so. Most of the gigabit-compatible hubs offered use gigabit for uplink, and a handful of 100-base-T links for the rest of the ports.

    Has this changed in the past 6 months or so?

    Using a PC as a router in place of a hub isn't an option, as one gigabit ethernet card will come very close to saturating a 32-bit 33 MHz PCI bus. Start streaming large amounts of data through the house and the router will fail to handle the traffic.

    1. Re:Gigabit over copper. by TMacPhail · · Score: 1

      Gigabit for uplink is generaly enough unless you are running a huge network. Each 'node' of computers will run at 100baseT and communicate with the server at that speed for a total of a gigabit from all the nodes combined.

    2. Re:Gigabit over copper. by Halvard · · Score: 1

      The problem is hubs. I have yet to see a good gigabit hub for under $2k or so. Most of the gigabit-compatible hubs offered use gigabit for uplink, and a handful of 100-base-T links for the rest of the ports.

      What sort of crack are you on? Check out the Linux Router Project , freesco, etc. I own an ISP that is Cisco free using entirely LRP based routers and firewalls.

      Some of these firewalls and routers are 486 and Pentium based systems. The core router currently is a measely Pentium 75 with 16 MBs ram and all is does it route packets....with ease. The core router is connected via fast ethernet to the backbone of my provider where I'm colo'd. The inside fast ethernet connections go to various class C networks.

      Aside from the more typical ISP functions, we light office buildings and sell bandwidth on a private network to networks and individuals within the building, all connections firewalled. There Pentium based machines with 16/32MB RAM and 6 ethernet/fast ethernet ports and K-6/2 or Celeron based machines with 64/128MB of RAM and up to 17 fast ethernet ports or 8 T-1's w/ CSUs. Most of these are rackmounts and some are "obsolete" low profile business grade systems.

      Using a PC as a router in place of a hub isn't an option, as one gigabit ethernet card will come very close to saturating a 32-bit 33 MHz PCI bus. Start streaming large amounts of data through the house and the router will fail to handle the traffic.

      I think for a router you will find that in practice it will be pretty difficult to saturate the 32-bit 33MHz PCI bus. This is a home network and we have a hard time saturating the bus in 100,000 square foot (12,200 square meter) office buildings with several hundred people getting internet access. Also, if you really must use GB Ethernet, I've seen copper Gigabit Ethernet cards for under $50. At that price, skip the hub/switch and put multiple in the router and bridge them, for connection to the downstream connections. If performance is critical, skip the hub idea altogether and really route or get a switch.

      For the time being, Gigabit Ethernet is probably unnecessary so use fast Ethernet. You can even get a 4 port PCI card that is a fast Ethernet switch. So that and another fast Ethernet card, and you've got your router. Or put 2 fast Ethernet cards in the router and buy a switch. Even the Realtek 8139 based cards work just fine and can be under $10 with some looking.

      At home, or at work, a PC based router is an elegant, inexpensive, highly reliable router.

    3. Re:Gigabit over copper. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      The problem is hubs. I have yet to see a good gigabit hub for under $2k or so. Most of the gigabit-compatible hubs offered use gigabit for uplink, and a handful of 100-base-T links for the rest of the ports.

      What sort of crack are you on? Check out the Linux [linuxrouter.org] Router Project [sourceforge.net], freesco, etc. I own an ISP [stormforge.net] that is Cisco free using entirely LRP based routers and firewalls.

      And your internal routers are either not routing (saturated) gigabit traffic through multiple cards, or not running on commodity hardware.

      Even a hub - not a router, which is more expensive - that can handle more than one gigabit connection at full data rate costs about $2000 US. Find me a better price, with a link. My own numbers are from dlink (http://www.dlink.com). The links you posted describe _software_. The problem is expensive _hardware_. The machines you describe do not have the internal data transfer bandwidth to handle multiple saturated gigabit interfaces, so I'm puzzled as to why you even mention them as examples.

      I think for a router you will find that in practice it will be pretty difficult to saturate the 32-bit 33MHz PCI bus.

      I am a-priori assuming an application that will saturate gigabit ethernet channels. Otherwise there's no reason to use gigabit at all, as you point out.

      More than one saturated gigabit ethernet interface would certainly swamp a 32-bit 33 MHz PCI bus.

      Joe user's LAN and cable modem won't do this. A fileserver with a single IDE drive won't do this.

      Something like, say, a communications-limited distributed computing project sure would, and most interesting computing problems are communications-limited when scaled up past one box.

      Any application that requires streaming uncompressed (lossless) video streams between machines at better-than-NTSC resolution would also require better bandwidth than 100-base-T provides. Why someone would use multiple machines for something like this is left as an exercise for the reader.

      Either way, both I and the post I was replying to were assuming the existence of some need for gigabit ethernet.

    4. Re:Gigabit over copper. by Halvard · · Score: 1


      The problem is hubs. I have yet to see a good gigabit hub for under $2k or so. Most of the gigabit-compatible hubs offered use gigabit for uplink, and a handful of 100-base-T links for the rest of the ports.



      Exactly my thought. Which is why I suggested multiple gigabit PCI cards. What I didn't state was that I was assuming that this would not be unsaturated. I've seen some less expensive switches in the "off brands" like D-Link, Netgear, etc., in the sub $1000 range but we are talking about a home network.


      And your internal routers are either not routing (saturated) gigabit traffic through multiple cards, or not running on commodity hardware.



      True. I'm not routing gigabit Ethernet, much less saturated. The network isn't saturated, despite lots of data flowing. They are running on commodity hardware though: some rackmounts w/ oem motherboards, "obsolete" name brand "business" grade and some highend clones. Just routing packets. It takes a lot of packets to saturate. However, Cisco uses the PCI bus for their routers as well like on the 7200 or the 2600's. Pretty much all their gear. Which clearly are not comodity equipment but they are PCI.



      More than one saturated gigabit ethernet interface would certainly swamp a 32-bit 33 MHz PCI bus.



      I haven't witnessed it myself but you probably are right about saturation with gigabit Ethernet. I don't have a sense about gigabit Ethernet on 64-bit PCI slot.



      I am a-priori assuming an application that will saturate gigabit ethernet channels. Otherwise there's no reason to use gigabit at all, as you point out.


      MAE East up until a couple of years ago was using ancient (assuming an Internet generation is 6 months and a calendar generation is 20 years) by Internet time DEC Gigaswitches, which are fast Ethernet switches. Designed to burst up to just over a GB for the whole switch, my recollection is they were operating at about 1.6 GB sustained in late 1997 or early 1998. This was basically saturated so you can imagine my wondering about saturating gigabit Ethernet at home.



      I find given current needs in a home that gigabit Ethernet would be needed on the mind-boggling side except in rare instances. Sorry for the crack about crack ;-) I think you and I are largely on the same page as it were.

  172. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by Teferi · · Score: 3, Informative

    cat5e is definitely gigabit, according to my handy Black Box catalog.
    cat6 hasn't been ratified yet, but will allow gigabit and beyond.

    --
    -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
  173. I wired my house by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

    Cat-5 and 2 10bastT hubs. One is a Linksys 8 port, the Cable modem comes into it, and then to my Freesco router. Which then goes to the 12port hub. That is then connected to all my drops. I have a coax drop in my room + 2 nonworking cat 5 drops (They worked, then quit, no clue why), a drop in my sisters room, and a drop in my moms office. Thats it, It works and gets the job done.

    1. Re:I wired my house by BenJaminus · · Score: 1
      not bad... I drew a network diagram the other day and was rather impressed - it's cat 5 throughout (which incidently we 'open sourced' from uni skips (yoink!))
      We have 100Mbs switches on every one of the 3 floors, ADSL going to a smoothwall firewall , a file server (running samba) for our mp3's and sometime in the future we're going to add a wireless router (so we can check email whilst down our local).

      Unfortunately we didn't have the luxury of wiring the house from scratch so it's all carefully placed under carpets. If we did however, we'd DEFFINATELY have cat 5 going to things like lights and heaters and stuff. How cool would it be to get a radio system with some server that does voice recognition - so you could walk in and just say "computer, lights!" (sorry I'm back onboard Voyager).

  174. Expensive by Mattsson · · Score: 1

    Fibercables are expensive, and the tools used for welding contacts, etc, are *really* expensive.

    (You can forget about running pre-made cables in your walls. :-)

    It's better to stay with the cat until you really *need* fiber.

    When that happens, the technology might have dropped a bit in price.

    Will probably be a while until then, considering that you can run 1GBps over cat6.

    --
    /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  175. fire code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this was an issue when i built my house in the phoenix, az area a few years ago. i ran all wiring while the house was just a frame and a roof. apparently, the wires throughout the attic were ok, but once i dropped them from the ceiling down the walls, the building inspector said they were a fire code violation. i had to pull them all back into the attic before construction would be allowed to continue. i did the drops when the house was done and beyond the scrutiny of the inspector. check your local building codes.

  176. That OTHER wire by jackal! · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you're going to do this, and do this right, might as well have fun.

    Run an indistinct wire, (go for red or something equally ominous) along with everything else.

    Ten years from now when you're pulling the old stuff with your buddies look terribly surprised or upset to see it. Claim that you have no idea to what it is, but always insist that THEY cut it any time one gets in your way...

    --

    Who moderates the meta-moderators?

  177. run 5e and wire pulls for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only thing that makes it cheap to install now is the ease of installation, and can be easily offset by that expensive fiber becoming useless by advancing technology; maybe the latest stereo equipment in 10 years needs a certain quality fiber and your stuff just doesn't match...doh!

    Put in string/wire for pulling new runs into each room. Having the string to pull new cables will make installing the latest+greatest in 10 years a snap if you need it. Also think through how "hard" the house really will be to wire once it is built. Consider that very few rooms will actually NEED ethernet, and houses with a complete basement or underground space access and/or attic space access are pieces of cake to wire(I wired the downstairs of one house with a full basement with open ceiling(ie floor joists visible etc) in about 30 minutes; the longest part was triple-checking where to drill holes through the wood flooring and terminating the cables.) Attics make wiring upstairs just as easy. Drop a wire down into the wall, poke hole in wall, pull wire into room, cut hole for electrical box, install box, terminate, and put faceplate in. Done.

    The trick/problem is when you need to go from the attic to the basement etc, or you need to get up to a room in the 1st floor and the area underneath it has a fully finished ceiling(like a plaster ceiling) and you can't just drill from below. Raised tile ceilings for basements are a great idea for exactly this reason, very easy access, and lower sound, too; some panels are very sound-absorbing, both reflective and transmitted(ie, sound in the room vs sound from upstairs etc) compared to a plastered ceiling. You can also sneak cabling up to there with a wire tube(some nice ones come with self-adhesive tape on the back, peel+stick after marking w/level etc) and just toss it across the tiles. Anyone who has worked at a startup company with a raised or open ceiling is very well aware of these advantages ;-)

    Run the Cat5e now because it's not going to get much cheaper, it already -is- cheap, and its easy to install now(plus, its extremely common and unlikely to go flying out the door any time soon.)

    Don't waste time having the contractor terminate the cables(it represents most of the labor) unless he/she can certify the runs(this means plugging in a VERY expensive piece of test gear, which runs dozens of different signal strength/crosstalk tests etc; the guy then gives you a sheet for EACH run that says its up to spec; Lucent, for example, requires this for use with their gear, as they do Lucent cable, which is some of the best I've used) otherwise, you're no better than they are and you'll save serious dough(server rooms where lots of runs are needed are a different matter; the pros can lay down cable, bunch it up and terminate it into patch boards into something that looks like fine art and works terrifically, plus they can certify each run, and you can have someone to scream at if the run doesn't work and the boss can't check his email; ALWAYS have a server room wired by the pros unless its less than a dozen runs and you don't need things to be critical.)

    Consider a patch panel in your wiring closet, and make accomodations for proper power(one dedicated 15 or 20a circuit should be fine), lighting(I suggest a long flour. light, NEVER a bare bulb, you'll be able to see much better) and cooling(vents top and bottom in the door.) Put a weatherstrip on the bottom of the door, this will keep out dust bunnies.)

    The patch panels are not -that- expensive, $100-200 for more wiring than you'll ever need. Same goes for 19 inch wallmount racks, they're very cheap and usually offer a swing-down design that affords VERY easy access to the backs of equipment. Spaced out, everything will keep cool, be easy to clean, and isn't going anywhere.

    Oh...also consider plenum instead of PVC. PVC puts out some -really- nasty stuff when it burns, and it's very thin, so it does burn very quickly(unlike thick PVC plumbing which is also full of water usually.) Plenum doesn't put out nasties when it burns(which is why its allowed in more places in commercial buildings than PVC is.)

    HTH!
    Brett

  178. How about a threat for running conduit? by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    I someone that likes to rearrage furnature little by little over the years. Is it practical to run it to all four walls? Is the result a bit hole in the wall with wires comming out or is the conduit coverd by an big access plate with plugs?

    How hard is it to wire through conduit? Would it meat that you have to gut the current wiring first? Would the whole thing take a full day, three days, a week of time to complete?

    And isn't it a bad idea to have say 10 datawires running this close to each other?

    1. Re:How about a threat for running conduit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the conduit can empty into a box, much like
      is done with light switches or electrical power faceplates. so all yr questions are the same as if you used power outlets w faceplates.

      wiring thru conduit depends on several things, such as width of conduit,
      percentage of conduit that is used, and most importantly, number of curvy twisty bends the conduit must go through.

      if you have 2 or 3 bends that are gentle and over a short distance then
      you can perhaps even 'push' your cable thru... but most likely you will need a 'cable snake', a long (50ft or more) steel cable that
      unwinds off a spool by hand, costs like 50 bucks at home depot. push this thru, attach yr cables, then pull it back. much easier with two people, one feeding
      the cable (pushing gently) other pulling.

      of course if your conduit is too long and twisty, you have to break it halfway thru and then
      do the 'pull' thing along the sub-sections of the conduit.

  179. Only need 2-3 drops by Tokerat · · Score: 1

    Have a drop upstairs, a drop downstairs, and maybe one in the garage. And put wireless hubs on each of them. If wireless gets faster/better, you can just sell your ports and buy new ones, and everything keeps working, no rewiring.

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  180. PVC by cgleba · · Score: 1

    Just run a 1 1/2" PVC pipe into the wall of every room. It's a pain in the a** to cut a hole in every 2x4 for it, but later if you need to add-change cables it makes it so very easy. PVC is also dirt cheap and very durable for this application.

    BTW don't run these PVC pipes through the beams of load-bearing walls. That's common sense, though.

  181. I HATE LAMENESS FILTERS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    LIBERATION FROM LAMENESS FILTERS, slashdot in its pure form

    AND FUCK VIM USERS

  182. HOME RUN EVERYTHING YOU DO!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fiber, Coax Cat-5, or whatever, home run the cables to a single location ( closet in garage/ basement) i.e. run from the outlet to the closet. This will give you the basics for future growth. If you do it with conduit, then there is nothing you cannot handle, ecept when you want to move an outlet so make sure you put things in the "right place".

    Here are things to think about:

    Use highest quality COAX ( ever try running a sat signal over cheap RG-6?)
    Use the highest quality CAT5 (There is a difference)
    Leave pull stings
    Speaker wire for whole house audio
    Speaker wire for rear surround (Make sure you look at Dolby 6.1 and others)

    Another one no-one has suggested is 1394! There is a up-coming spec for 1394 over 300 ft at monsterous rates.Plus look at DTV connections, they are slowly moving to 1394.

    D

  183. i say go with fiber..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i mean, that glass fibre insulation stuff is cheap, non-flammable, keeps you warm in winter, cool in summer. another option is polystyrene. its cheaper and you dont get that darned fibre stuck in your skin. you're right, it'll be way expensive to put that stuff in after the drywall.

  184. Pneumatic Tubes by justfred · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget the Pneumatic Tubes (http://www.ptubes.com/). I really want to build a house with a pneumatic tube network. Use it for sending things like sandwiches and martinis.

    That and the network of toy train tracks running around the crown molding...

    But seriously, dittos on the conduit; home wiring is traditionally held down with things like STAPLES - ewwww. And get yourself a good fish tape (http://www.wisecomponents.com/storecatalog/wirepu ll.htm) while you're at it.

  185. why cables at all? by da_bza_420 · · Score: 1

    why run ethernet at all? you will probably be happier in the end with a 802.11b network in the house, since you wont have cables to deal with nor deal with the "oops, I put the drop on the wrong side of the room" stuff.

  186. Shielded? Nobody uses shielded. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I've run buildings with miles of unshielded cat5.. so what do you mean? In fact.. isn't the spec for cat5 unshielded twisted-pair?

  187. Yes.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    They most certainly ARE low voltage.

    You don't get 200+ volt spikes on phone lines.
    The only time you get AC with any voltage is during the ring-trip.

    1. Re:Yes.. by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ring voltage is around 90V, so please don't think of phone lines as low voltage. Also, have you ever seen the spikes on a phone line when there is a lightning strike at a telephone pole?

      Low voltage? Guess again...

    2. Re:Yes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If i can touch the "live" wires and not get shocked, its low voltage.

    3. Re:Yes.. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      If i can touch the "live" wires and not get shocked, its low voltage.

      Then it's not low voltage when it's ringing because you'll definitely get shocked. I know. I've been working on phone lines when calls came in.

  188. Wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adding the extra conduit before the drywall/plaster is put up is the best way to go. 2 drops per room is on the low side as all walls should have at least 1 drop per wall. You can run multipule outlets for tv, cable, sat, phones and cat5 to 1 double gang box but do not run them with your power lines. Hubbell, Belkin and others sell the covers that allow you to run 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 or more outlets of various types so check with an electrical supply house for what is locally available.

  189. Conduit by Null_Packet · · Score: 2

    Run conduit or at least plenty of pull-wires/strings. That way you don't have as much of an issue and you can run what you like when the time comes. If you use conduit and pullwires, then you can pull/add/remove what you like.

  190. Why bother running cat5e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of trying to guess what you will need later run 1.5" PVC pipe in home runs from each wall to a central closet. Then run what ever wire you need in the pipe. Easy to change or add to later.

  191. How about shafts/conducts? by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    How about a cable conduct at standard height around every room?
    You can get these in plastic by the meter readymade with snap-on and removeable coverbrackets. If you make shure that you sink them flat into the walls at a height where you don't wanna drill a hole to hang something you'll have all the time in the world to decide wether CAT 5, 6, 7, fibre or that brandnew Cat Tenmillion (TM) thats bound to leave the specs-drawer in just 6 months or so. No matter what cables come in the future, you can put the all into that conduct and never have to sweat about scalability anymore.

    BTW: That's the way im gonna do that as soon as I build my first house. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  192. What nonesense by owlmeat · · Score: 1

    In a residential installation you don't need to shield your phone lines and you don't have to worry about cat5 next to power.

    I have a couple of rooms in my house where two of the cat5 pairs are running 10BT and the other 2 pairs are phone with no problem whatsoever.

    As to the installation, if you can run "smirf tube" from a central point to all the rooms. Then you can pull whatever you want in the future.

    --
    They stab it with their steely knives,

    But they just can't kill the beast.

    1. Re:What nonesense by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      True phone lines aren't a problem, however 10Base-T is not 100Base-TX. Furthermore, when he upgrades to 1000Base-TX NICs, he'll be totally out of luck if he goes out of spec or has the slightest interference. AC power can be a big problem.

      Don't come near power lines and even more importantly fluorescent lights. Anything with a large power draw or heat source (HVAC units). Another thing to consider is that for the most part you might not have a problem, but when you run high amp items, you might notice problems if you're close. Items like microwave ovens, toaster ovens, and whereever you'd plug in a vacuum (huge amp draw).

  193. Third opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your spelling sucks.
    You presumeably mean "you're" in your sig.

    1. Re:Third opinion by utdpenguin · · Score: 1
      Your. Your Your Your. I mean your. Get over yourself.

      --
      In Soviet Russia you dant have to put up with these crappy jokes
    2. Re:Third opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Ok, your ugly too.

      No, please don't take away my ugly!

      On second thought, go right ahead. Knock yourself out.

      There's lots of ugly to go around.

    3. Re:Third opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you even bothered to look up the meaning of "your"?

      Your .sig makes no sense.

    4. Re:Third opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People make themselves look like complete fuckwits when they make spelling mistakes and writing errors in a post complaining about spelling mistakes. It's "presumably", not "presumeably", bozo. What's more, "[y]ou presumably mean" is appalling English; it should be "Presumably, you mean...".

    5. Re:Third opinion by utdpenguin · · Score: 1
      my sig make perfect sense. To me.

      --
      In Soviet Russia you dant have to put up with these crappy jokes
  194. Need more cables!!!! by itwerx · · Score: 1

    Only two drops per room?!? Not even close to enough! I would do two drops per wall (8 per room) at a minimum, and possibly 4 (2 pair) on rooms with longer walls (as many as 16 drops per room).
    The rationale is simple. You never know when/where you'll need 'em, and s'long as you've got the wall open anyway it doesn't cost any more (beyond a few dollars extra cable anyway).

    1. Re:Need more cables!!!! by ajschrotenboer · · Score: 1

      I may be a bit off base here, but at 8 drops per room, you will need one hub per room (maybe per 2 rooms).

      I don't mean that this would be a bad thing, but it is something to consider. Besides, interlinking hubs can be a good way to do it. Cut down on numebr of cables in the walls, fewer conduits, etc.

    2. Re:Need more cables!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I may be a bit off base here, but at 8 drops per room, you will need one hub per room (maybe per 2 rooms).

      The idea here was the same as power outlets - not that they're all used at once, but that it shortens the wire runs between outlets and the boxes using them. Opposite sides of the room w/o cables running all around the baseboards, etc.

  195. Suggestion by AaronW · · Score: 2

    I wired my older house with tons of CAT5E and coax (use RG6 for coax, BTW). I ran 1 to 2 lines from each room to a central closet where I also installed an AC outlet. In the closet I have a firewall router, cable modem, fast Ethernet switch, and a UPS ($5 at a swap).

    This has worked out quite well. With this setup I can control the cable and network of each room from one central location.

    This was an older home. It was fairly easy to do since I have a crawl space below the house and an attic above.

    If there are places that will be difficult to reach later, put in some tough nylon string to feed wires or cable through later. You will be glad you did. Also, it never hurts to run extra cat5e, as you never know when you'll need it. Cat5e also makes excellent phone cable.

    -Aaron

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  196. Run conduit.... by jordandeamattson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All

    Instead of trying to figure out what to run and what not to run to particular rooms, it is better to run conduit to your specific rooms. This will give you the flexibility to pull CAT-5, Fiber, phone cable, etc. into a particular room without going behind the drywall.

    Therefore, to give yourself the greatest flexibility, I would run conduit down each of the walls in your house. In addition, conduit will protect any cables that you run in the future. One of the problems I have seen with running "naked" cables - of any kind - is that nails or screws used to secure the drywall often end up breaking them. A conduit will protect your cables and "clothe" them.

    In addition, if I was building out a new house, I would put in a few additional items that will make your life easier over the long-term. First, I would build a "wire closet" to which I would run all of my conduits. Second, I would create places in the roof to receive wireless points of presence, so that you can get full coverage over your whole house. Make sure that these wireless access points are appropriately wired for power and have a conduit with CAT-5 running to them. Depending on the size of your house you will need two to four. Position them by looking for a coverage zone of 75 feet (yes, I know that they claim they can hit 150 feet, but this will give you strong coverage). And third, I would look at running a home automation network that would allow you to control lighting, heating, etc. throughout your house.

    Finally, if you haven't put up the roof yet, look at going with solar shingles with a grid tie power system. This will cost more than a standard roof, but with the buy-down that you can get in many states and the zero electric bill you will see, it will the same as a standard roof in the short-term and will cost less within 5 to 10 years.

  197. correct cat5e cable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for $60 I think the cable is not for installing inside of the wall, you might need the one that's around $120. They are different.

  198. Forget the cable, worry about replacing them by ghostrider_one · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If I may make a humble suggestion, you should be less worried about what types of cable you run, and more worried about your ability to easily (ie without knocking holes in walls, cieling, etc) replace them in the future. A friend of mine (who yearns to return to the good ol' days when men were men, and code was punched on pieces of cardboard) (Hi, Ross) completely wired his house with state-of-the-art cabling when it was first built. Unfortunatly, what was state-of-the-art back then (ie 10-Base2 coax) is antiquated crap now.


    What I would suggest if you /really/ want to future-proof your cabling is to run all the cabling in PVC conduits with built in pulling-wires. Or alternatively, leave plenty of pulling wires in cielings etc.. Making sure it's going to be easy to pull through new cables in X years down the track, is a hell of a lot more worthwhile than worrying about whether Cat5 or Fibre will still be useful then. The design life of a house is a hell of a lot longer than the useful life of a cabling system.

  199. Ethernet cable is cheap? by richardmilhousnixon · · Score: 2, Informative

    One thing you might want to consider when running your Ethernet cable along with your phone (which in normally not in a conduit), is that local fire codes often require that any vertically-running cable be in a conduit or be fire retardant. You really can't get a 1000' spool of good fire retardant 5e cable for $60. Keep in mind that when wiring your house, the cable is probably going to be the least expensive component, but if you screw up and buy crappy cable (that burns like tissue paper or shatters when you try to crimp it), it can quickly become a serious headache and a serious expense.

    I wired my (already constructed) house a few years ago with cheap cat5 ($50 a spool) and was later informed by an inspector that, if I ever wanted to sell the house, I'd have to replace or remove the cable that I used.

    My suggestion to you is, because your house hasn't been dry walled yet (I assume), run at least one length of conduit to each room (If you want to have two cables going to each room, run one of them along the base of the wall) and use medium-quality cable. If you would rather not pay for conduit, use high-quality fire retardant cable, and talk to an electrician about your local rules and regs.

    --

    --
    -- sometimes AND gates turn me on.
    1. Re:Ethernet cable is cheap? by jroysdon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out Greybar (can't find an online presence). Plenum (fire retardant) cable can be bought for $60-70 for 1000ft. A definent must if you're looking at running power over ethernet. Good powered networking gear (Cisco Catalyst switches) will power down the port if they try and draw too many amps (see it happen when bad runs were causing power loss along the way). I'd hate to see what happens with cheaper gear.

    2. Re:Ethernet cable is cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      not 1000 ft., but you can get 500 ft. spools
      of General Cable Riser-rated (fire-retardant)
      Cat5e from HOME DEPOT (of all places) for about
      $50.00

  200. Legal requirements by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    Some people have glossed over this in passing, but you should pay attention:

    In some states, you are legally required to be an electrician (low voltage license) to do this.

    Florida is one example; it was passed this year.

    If you live in a state with this requirement, you might fail your inspection if you do this, and not be able to move into your house.

    Further, if you are building in a development and didn't hire the builder yourself, you must coordinate this with them, or they might very well rip your wires out. I've seen it happen, there is a house in my development sitting empty because the guy put Monster Cables for his stereo through the walls one night, and they cut them all into pieces and threw them away the next day. He backed out of the deal as a result, and now it's an inventory home. They didn't really have much of a choice, since if they fail the inspection they eat the house.

  201. don't do this - static danger! by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    I actually do run cat5 outside the house, down and through the basement, and up through the floor from there. The problem is that the outdoor cable is very exposed to static in the air, and especially during a storm may damage your electronic equipment connected to that cable!

    A storm took out all the 3com nics on my network, but the intel nics survived. Needless to say, we run all intel nics now...

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  202. Gary Condit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's clear that a certain dislexic California congressman has been checking out /. recently.
    "Run Conduit!"
    Okay, it was lame, I know.

  203. Wiring? Who needs that? Wireless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get wireless dude.

  204. Don't run fiber today, just run plastic conduit. by Nonesuch · · Score: 3, Informative
    I would not run fiber now.

    What I would do is build a patch panel or wiring closet in a basement or similar location, with all telephone/data/audio cabling to other parts of the house home-run to this location.

    If you run 'smurf' (flexbible blue fire-rated plastic tubing) to each room, and two each to bedrooms, media room, then you should be ready for anything.

    When you run the smurf, draw 2xCat5e to each room along with any necessary speaker cable. Most fire codes will permit you to leave in a 'pull line' of a code-accepted material, so you can easily draw more cables (fiber, etc) as needed.

    When running the 'smurf' tubing, try to avoid running in parallel with power conduits, or if you must, maximize the separation. Where you pass power lines, try to intersect at right angles.

  205. Wow, just did that! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wired up my apartement in a similar way. The apt only had ONE phone jack in the living room and I needed one in the hobby room.
    Bought two six-way wall plates and some RJ-45 and coax connectors (Nordx/cdt), and some cat5e cable.
    I ripped away the quarter round from the living room to the bedroom, there was just enough room between the wall and the floor. Shoved a phone wire, RG-59 and cat5e in there and nailed the quarter round back.
    Then I drilled from the bedroom to the kitchen (narrowly missing the sink drain pipe) and ran a raceway from the kitchen to the other room.
    The wall plate replaced the phone jack in the living room, and I just poked a hole in the hobby room for the other plate.
    Passing RG-59 lets me send my VCR's modulator output, allowing me to send video and stereo sound over one shielded cable. It's not hi-fi, but in the hobby room all I have is a 14 inch TV.
    And the next guy can use the coax to use a cable modem in the hobby room, or whatever.
    Cost me about 50$ cdn and a weekend of work. Oh yeah, while installing, periodically test the cables to make sure...

  206. Wiring a house by fdiaz5583 · · Score: 1

    Well I dropped 4 lines per room with a phone line in the same box. If you have it done professionally, it will add value to your home. Remember it MUST be installed by a LICENSED CONTRACTOR to have the value added to your home. Unfortunately, after a week of climbing through the attic and threading cat 5 through the walls we realized that. On the upside we have 4 wired rooms, and have a server that plays DIVX movies and mp3's for the rest of the home to enjoy

  207. Cable? Sturdy strings by Basje · · Score: 1

    This is no joke. Make sure there's enough space in the tubing, and put sturdy strings in them. That way, you can tie a string to a new cable and insert it into the wall without hassle, in a few minutes.

    Cabling needs change. A few years back, there would have been coax, now it's cat5 or optic. What's next. Who knows. Maybe wireless....

    --
    the pun is mightier than the sword
  208. Conduits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Conduits is the only real anwser to the question of running fiber. What if the fiber you run for some reason or is the right type ten years from? Unlikely, but possiable. By running Conduits, it doesn't what you put in it now or tomorrow because it would be so easy to add or take away.

    The answer is, run fiber if you want, but make sure you run conduits.

  209. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by Hobart · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, whether or not the cable jacket is plenum-rated (usually with Teflon) is completely unrelated to whether or not they wrap an extra layer of foil around the wire (shielded vs unshielded). If you're running unbalanced signals down the wire, such as RS232 serial data (Like Cisco or Sun Netra consoles), shielding is good. But Ethernet and Telephone send electrically opposite signals down each wire, so the electromagnetic fields and the twisting of the wire helps fight interference.

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  210. run smurf pipe.... by StationL5 · · Score: 0

    then you can add anything you want later on....

  211. Video and automation over cat5 by philipsblows · · Score: 1

    Just two days ago I was at a company called Ultimate Entertainment in Scottsdale, AZ, and they said they run cat5 all over for automation, alarm, and even video distribution as part of their structured wiring package.

    Apparently, they distribute HDTV throughout the home, and while they will also run coax or other normal structured wiring, this seemed interesting to me just because it would seem to simplify things a bit.

    I actually went there looking into home automation work that they do based on a recommendation, including the fact that they are doing a project in southern california for $1.2 million in home entertainment and automation electronics alone. They are really focused on the entertainment side (as their name suggests), though, so I wouldn't consider them a superior resource for the other stuff, but a lot of automation devices can be added if cat5 is already run to the places you want it. If you plan ahead, you can avoid X-10 and have a system that works quite well.

    I was particularly impressed with the wall-mounted touchscreens from ELAN and Crestron that they had mounted in their demo rooms, because they looked really great and make for a clean thermostat/security/lighting/A/V control panel.

    Bottom line, Cat5 is useful for lots of other stuff in addition to computer networking. BTW, I am not affiliated in any way with any of the companies I referred to.

  212. You don't know how right you are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just took a dump, and oh man, you really will regret it later if you don't put in fibre!

    1. Re:You don't know how right you are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, Slashdot, the only place with highly-moderated toilet humour.

  213. Don't plan on using wireless. by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    KjetilK writes:
    Other than that, I'll base it on wireless. People here have voiced concerns about security, and indeed, it must be made in such a way that the firewall isn't made pointless. But putting a lot of wire when you can use Bluetooth (which has been my primary choice, but I don't know), or 802.11 seems a complete waste.
    I wouldn't plan on using wireless. The bandwidth is limited, and it is shared bandwidth, whereas if you wire ethernet you can go switched- this is a huge distinction.

    The non-licensed spectrum, especially the 2.4Ghz range where 802.11b lives, is open to all sorts of consumer devices. A couple of neighbors with wirelss X-Cams and your 802.11b network is drowned in noise, totally dead. (I have tested this).

    You can't wire all the gadgets I want anyway (I want the fridge online!
    Security is also a major risk- wireless can easily be sniffed and is not difficult to spoof.

    Do you really want some script kiddie rooting your fridge?

    1. Re:Don't plan on using wireless. by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      =====
      Do you really want some script kiddie rooting your fridge?
      =====

      Can't some of the wireless access point devices simply keep a list of allowed devices via hardware card address? That will prevent any active connections to the WAP since the kiddie's wireless laptop won't have a known hardware address entered in your WAP? I am thinking specifically about the Linksys WAP11 which may be turned into a mode that allows only known hardware to contact it.

      So that brings up the question of if a passive sniffer runing snort / h4x0r tool of the day can find the hardware address of a device on the wireless net and then spoof it . . .

      robi

  214. patch panels and other advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (sorry for posting AC but i don't have my /. password to hand.)

    i did this in my house two years ago and it worked great. this was in ireland though so YMMV.

    if i were to do it again i would do ONE thing differently: and that would be terminate all the wiring in the house with a patch panel. don't just leave a bunch of wires dangling in the hot-press/airing-cupboard.

    also i recommend quad-socket faceplates as an absolute minimum because you never have enough connections where you want them. the components are dirt cheap.

    get a pro to come in and test the cables and label (with durable dymo labels) them at both ends, this avoids headaches for you later and is worth the money (i rolled my own but wouldn't do it again).

    remember that you can run your phones over cat5 as well, and just terminate with rj11 connectors or an rj45<->rj11 convertor (i prefer the latter option). don't run cat3 around the house, just use cat5 for everything; economy of scale should work in your favour.

    you could put in a small rack in the hot-press for your router/switch/pbx/patch panels etc. but maybe that's overkill/outside a domestic budget.

    any questions feel free to mail me vdm at vdm.cc.

  215. conduit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its been said many times in this post, but it is by far the only fool proof answer. conduit conduit conduit conduit conduit

  216. use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by OmniGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    And if the contractor can't handle conduit (find a better contractor?!), you can do it yourself. Steel conduit is cheap (I know, 'cause I've done this), and conduit benders are not difficult to use. Of course, if you don't wanna use a conduit bender, you can buy prefab curved sections.

    A few things to keep in mind:

    0. Use METAL conduit rather than plastic - indefinite lifetime, RF shielding, and nailproof when hanging pictures. Also easily findable with stud-finder gadgets at need.

    1. Use BENDS rather than square corners (and insist the contractor do so -- inspect before accepting...). Makes pulling cable more fun, and VITAL for fiber (if it ever comes to that)

    2. If you do it yourself, make sure you debur the insides of all conduit ends with the little blade on the tubing cutter. It really sucks to have a short 'cause the conduit cut the insulation.

    3. Check local codes and the building inspector on how to GROUND the conduit properly (one probably grounds this to the building safety ground at the electrical service entrance -- a definite building-inspector question). The building inspector can be made into a very handy resource if you social-engineer the interaction properly - you want him to take you seriously, and to understand that you want to, and are able to, do things right and with proper permits; at this point, he ceases to be an obstacle and becomes an ally. Also, be real clear to the building department that your conduit is LOW-VOLTAGE wiring and NOT power wiring; the code requirements are different.

    Lastly, 3Com has a nifty mini-hub that fits into a wall box, seen on /. recently...

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
    1. Re:use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by NuttyBee · · Score: 1

      Ok -- of all the posts.. This poster got it right.

      The answer is metal conduit to a central cabling area with pull boxes along the way.

      Why?

      Because unforeseen change is inevitable, the best you can do is plan for it.

      Building a house today, I'd put in:

      1. 1.5"-2" Metal Conduit or FLEX (1" is a bit tight when you add more that a couple of cables.)

      2. 2 to 4 -- Cat 5 To Each Room 2 for a normal room, 4 for an entertainment or other area that might have special needs.

      3. 2 or 3 -- RG-6 or RG-11 depending on length

      One is for your cable or broadcast TV, the other 1 or 2 can be used for satellite or cable or some other broadband connection.

      4. A Blonder Tongue (Yes there is a company called this) Master Distribution Amp.. They make good stuff -- expect to pay for it. So that each of your rooms get a clean balanced signal from the master antenna or cable system.

      5. If fiber becomes the next big thing, you put in the conduit and pull boxes, it's not going to be hard to add. You'll redo the rooms several times before the question of fiber comes up. Fiber To The Home? I can't even get DSL or decent cable TV to the home.

    2. Re:use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by crucini · · Score: 2

      Good points. But don't cut electrical conduit with a pipe cutter - use a hacksaw with the appropriate blade. For EMT that would be 24 teeth per inch. If you use a pipe cutter and fully remove the internal ridge, it takes way longer than using a hacksaw. The only real benefit to a pipe cutter is that the cut is perfectly square. EMT fittings already incorporate tolerance for slightly off-square cuts.

      One other point - if the conduit is installed by a contractor, it's good to require that he pull a mandrel through while you watch. This proves that no obstructions are decreasing the area of the conduit. Obviously, the mandrel must be of the same size as the conduit.

    3. Re:use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by CharlieG · · Score: 2

      I assume you mean EMT, and NOT rigid steel, because you mentioned the bender (aka a Hickie)

      Living in NYC, electrical is fun - 110v stuff ALL has to be metal armored - be it EMT, rigid, or BX cable - no romex here

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    4. Re:use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by jpostel · · Score: 2

      I worked a job where the electrician ran the Cat5 through PVC conduit. I literally wore through a bend by pulling RG6 through with a nylon cord. The friction of the nylon just ate away the PVC.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
    5. Re:use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can you get junction boxes that fit 1.5" or 2" steel conduit?

  217. Why fiber? by zipzip · · Score: 1

    Remember CAT5 has a maximum length run of 100m (90+10), if you need a run of greater than that then you do need fiber.

  218. THE BATHROOM!!!! by SuperDuG · · Score: 2
    Alright ... I know it may seem a little "icky", but you definantelly need to remember to put a phone line and an ehternet port in the bathroom ... I'm sorry, but all those times you'll be sitting there ... relatively bored ... you could be conducting business transactions and sending email ...

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  219. Some thoughts.... by chrisd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Some things I've run into with my basement remodel and upgrading a 1936 place for modern data and phone. The previous owenr updated the electric froom hook and look to conduit.

    1....You want to be careful about running parallel data/phone, audio,video and power close to each other. Even with high quality cable, you can have problems.

    2.....Do not strand boxes with wire inside them. Sealing over live boxes is a huge no-no. Why? Because what if you drive a nail into an active box. Many municipalistes will force you to correct this if you want to move.

    3.....You cannot route wires through heating /ac ducts. Probably ovious, but I thought I'd note it.

    4.....Always run more cat-5 than you need. If you are pulling two lines for net and phone, pull another. It's no real extrta cash and coudl save you later. Also, it's nice if you want to pull an extra line that is outside the firewall to your office for guests.

    5.....Think about where you want your wireless for home coverage. I have a smaller house, so I don't have any problem, but if my house were more spread out, I'd probably hav eto move the antenna out of the basement, necessitating a run of cat-5 to wherever, with nearby power. It's either that or run a very long antenna line.

    6.....Power, power, power. A computer + Laser Printer + Ups + Monitor + other gee gaws will suck up at least a 20 amp circuit. You don't want to over load a circuit. That's bad. I'm running 3 seperate circuits for the home office. 1 for fridge and other stuff, 1 for computer geear and 1 for lighting.

    7.....Check references for all contractors if you aren't plannign on pulling bits yourself.

    8.....Get familiar with your local codes. They are there to protect you, generally. Finding out where you are required to do GFCI circuits alone can save you trouble later.

    Good luck.

    --
    Co-Editor, Open Sources
    Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
  220. string by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have him run some string along with the wires, so you can easily do it yourself in the future. just tie whatever wire or fiber you want to the string in one room of the house, and pull from the other room.

  221. Fibre because you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's always the opportunity of bragging rights if you have Fibre in the house.
    A friend of mine recently had his house built, we ran 4 CAT5 drops to each room upstairs (his wife wouldn't let him wire the main floor) and then ran a fibre backbone from the upstairs to the basement for use in the future. His reasoning for this was so he can say "I have a fibre backbone in my house"....it's all about bragging rights :)

  222. Just be careful of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cheap CAT 5 wiring... oxidation and O2 content is rampant in the cheap wire and can give you serious problems downt he road.

    There are nice, bundled, romex-like cables that have phone, cat 5/6, CATV, and Fiber all in one that can be ran to each room, and even some nice faceplates to hook it all up. Average foot/run cost is around 6 bucks, which isn't bad for a 5by cable.

    The buried power box scheme is nice in theory, but many areas and their associated building codes will NOT let you do that. Be careful there.

    Another interesting thing you can do is run some hidden plates for power, phone, and cat 5 to the middle of the floor... that and central vac (they can be co ran).

    If you go with 5x wiring, you get the added option of Monster quality speaker wire (which can double up as home automation control wiring too with some systems).

    If your house is rather conventional in design, with a space attic, run your cables vertically down the wall from the attic and put your routers and associated networking equipment in a sealed closet in the attic... make sure to provide adequate ventilation and environmental control to this space as well.

    If you are doing a home theater with in wall speakers, be ware of most speaker installations and types, they are UNSHIELDED and can wreak havoc on your Cat 5 hardwiring (and possibly phones).

  223. My experiance by Pathway · · Score: 1
    Wiring houses is my job. I do it for a living, and I really enjoy it. I also happen to live in an area where Fiber is avalible to the house, (Grant County, Washington for the curious. There have been Slashdot stories before about it. I'm even running a rinky-dinky website off of it.) and from the point of service the rest of the wiring is copper Cat 5.

    If I were to build a house, there are a few things I would do. Many others would have diffrent ideas, but I'll just throw in my two cents here.

    First off, I would find a room somewhere in the house of which I would make my wiring closet. Generaly, you want this to be somewhere in the middle of the house and undisterbed. Under stairs, a spare closet, a small room, a section of the garage, whatever.

    In this room, which will be for ever more be your wiring closet, there are a few things you want to avoid: Anything that could bring in moisture. Water pipes, sprinkler systems, avoid all that. Also, avoid florecent lights if possible, as they add alot of interfirance to communication lines.

    Next, get some kind of conduit to each room. The wider, the better. If you want 2 or more places in each room wired (say, 2 oppesite walls) have a spot in the room where they split off from. All your communication wiring is going to go through this conduit: Phone, Cat 5, Cable TV... But not power. Power should have it's own route.

    I picked up at my local Ace Hardware store a bucket of 6500' of tested 210 lb. pull cord, and it was $35. Buy this, and with the wires you pull, keep a line of this stuff in the conduit as well. If you have to pull another wire, make sure you pull another lenght of the pull line. Do this, and you can upgrade for the future.

    Fiber is wonderful stuff, but it's extremely expensive. If the future of fiber is anything like what we have here, you will get a fiber connection to a 10/100 8 port switch, and it's Cat 5 through the rest of the house. That's the most likely situation I can see for the future of Fiber to the home.

    Now, lable every conduit, so you know which room each pipe leads to. If you need to get the Pull line though, but you don't know how, here's a trick: Get a fairly powerfull shop vaccum, a plastic bag, and a roll of 10 lb fishing line. Suck the bag though with the fishing line tied to it, then pull your first pull line with the fishing line. After that, just remember to always leave a pull line behind after you pull again.

    There are those who say "Don't put phone lines and coax cable next to Cat-5!" and "Buy the sheilded Cat-5e that's supposed to be Cat-6 rated, or you won't get a good connection!" While that's all good and dandy, don't worry about it that much. You can get fairly good connections with fairly poor wiring, and I've seen it. I even know a guy who puts his Ethernet, Phone and Appletalk all though the same unsheilded Cat-5 cable. And it works great. While phone wires aren't generaly sheilded, they are not really that bad compared to other hazards your going to have to get buy with your wiring. Coax is sheilded by nature, and Cat-5's twists are designed to prevent some of the interferance you'll get. This was all thought out long ago, so don't sweat it.

    Looking into the future, yes: you may have Fiber optics. You also might be using 802.11g wirless, or even perhaps some other undrempt type of connectivity. You can't always know what's going to come... but hey, you've got the conduit to put it in, so you're set.

    Pathway

  224. professional structured wiring by spudman · · Score: 1

    I work for a comany that does structured wiring installs, and have wired quite a few myself. I would suggest finding a company near you that installs USTec equipment ( http://www.ustecnet.com/products.html ). You will be hard pressed to find a better product line, and if its put in by a certified dealer, it has a 15 year warranty. Don't stop with only 6 drops in the entire house--at least one or two in every room, and look at your floorplans and decide where you might want stuff in the future.

  225. Install metal conduit by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    Suggestion: Use conduit. Have the electrician run 1" metal or flexmetal
    conduit to extra wallboxes instead and insist on mild turns (no sharp 90's).
    Terminate one end of each conduit at a wallbox and the other at a central
    point in the house, probably where the phone lines enter in the basement.
    Invest in a "fish tape" from your local hardware superstore so you can pull
    wires through. Finally, attach a thick wire to all of the conduit and run
    it outside to a copper stake in the ground.

    Advantages: Run cat5/coax/fiber/futuretech to individual rooms as needed.
    Use only as much as needed, of the types needed, when needed. The grounded
    metal conduit serves as a faraday cage, keeping interference sources (such
    as power wires) from impacting the signals. The no-sharp-90s rule allows the
    fiber optic cable to work right (won't lose any signal out of sharp
    turns because there are no sharp turns).

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Install metal conduit by Sedennial · · Score: 1

      I recommend Spazmania's method, but pne additional suggestion I'd make is to run a pull string (get some nice nylon thread) through each condiut from your primary access point. Label each pull string as to the room or box it terminates at.

      This will allow pulling your future cables, fiber, etc, to be much easier. When you pull in the future, pull another string through with the cable you are running, and, voila, you are all set for another future pull.

  226. 200? by fm6 · · Score: 2

    That's worth a Slashdot article all by itself!

  227. Home Theater Wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to run the cables for a home theater system as well, while you're at it.

  228. I ran fiber, but... by Multics · · Score: 2

    I have mostly cat 5e everywhere. Into each wall three drops. Then a drop is normally phone and the other two can be whatever. All run as a star.

    I *did* run fiber and a Topaz transformer ultra-isolated AC circuit (with separate ground) to the stuff that then goes on to my antenna tower. The goal was to use the fiber as a 20 meter lighting gap between the stuff over there (soon to be a long-haul 802.11 link) and the rest of my network. So now when (not if) lightning comes to wreck my day, the worst that will happen in terms of data is the tower end of the data service (fiber hub, 802.11 stuff, some ham stuff) will all go POOF, but the core network will be safe.

    If I had a separate garage, I'd run fiber (via a conduit) to there too. Fiber is *perfect* for longer hauls where lightning can be a problem. I buy all my fiber links from ebay, BTW... way cheaper than 'for real' and also allows me to avoid having to terminate them myself.

    -- Multics

  229. Check and test wires BEFORE the drywall goes up by JustAnotherReader · · Score: 1

    We ran cat5 in our house during a remodel. Be sure to put temporary connectors on each end and test every cat 5 wire before the drywall goes up. Also, be sure to leave plenty of extra wire in the blue box.

    Also, make sure the wires go where you expect them to go. I totally missed that the electrician put all the cables in except one, the one to my front room with my TV/Stereo. So the idea of having my MP3 server play through my stereo is now no longer available unless I want to rip up the walls and route new wires.

    Take photos of the wiring in the walls before the insulation goes in and the drywall goes up. Drywallers have a habit of plastering over anything that isn't moving too quickly. I've had entire AC boxes plastered over. With the photos you can check to see if you're missing any outlets and if so the photos will tell you where to cut through the plaster.

    Don't let the electrician wire the outlets. Unless they know how to do it they will wire them wrong. Wire your outlets to wireing spec T568B. Be sure it's "B" and not "A". And don't untwist the pairs more than 1/2 an inch. Our contractor wired every one of them wrong and had 4 to 5 inches of untwisted wire. I was amazed that any of them worked.

    While you're wiring it would be nice of all the ends of the cat5 cables came to a central point. We have an attic where they all terminate as does the cable TV cable, the phone lines, and a power outlet. That way I have my cable modem going to a Linux box running my firewall that goes to an 8 way hub. The hub outputs go to a patch bay with all the cat5 cables for each room.

    But watch those contractors. And take those photos. I wish I had taken my own advice.

    1. Re:Check and test wires BEFORE the drywall goes up by jhines · · Score: 1

      actually, NO, it is practice to put up the conduit first, install the drywall, then pull the wires.

      This way any nail penetration is found when the wire is pulled, and not later in life.

      Got yelled at by a code inspector for this one, pulling wire before the drywall was installed.

  230. More information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There are various (cheapish - under $100) ways of running video over Cat5. Personally, I've got Cat5 and audio cables into rooms, and run everything over that.

    Could you provide some pointers to the cheaper solutions?

  231. Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guessing what we will need 10 years down the line is tough. However, I would stay to stick with regular copper cabling because fiber is just too expensive. If you can pay a little more, I would recommend getting Cat5e PLENUM Rated Cabling. The difference is that if plenum cable catches fire, it doesn't release toxic fumes whereas all the other forms do.

    The other reason that sticking to copper is okay is because fiber's big thing is really NOT bandwidth, but rather distance and bandwidth. Most things that fiber can do, copper can do a lot cheaper but limited to 500ish feet. Assuming you aren't building a campus-sized house, I think using fiber is way overkill.

    Besides, who would want to put fiber into their house if it is possible that 10 years from now that fiber is defunct and you would need to install NEW copper or fiber anyway?

  232. Run the Cat5 - plan but don't run for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certainly run the cat5. Run as many wires as you can that you think you might have use for, but running fiber or anything else for ten years from now isn't the best way to go. If I had built a home ten years ago I would have run ethernet cable all through it - but that coax would either be going to waste today or become video cable! I doubt that anything you run today would be the right thing for ten years from now, and would likely be so expensive if it were the right choice that doing it now still wouldn't be right. I would suggest laying out things and perhaps installing conduit or even just string, wires or twine to help you pull other things through the walls later when new technology defines what you need. Don't forget speaker wires, perhaps video or RF (cable/satellite TV) wires and some extra control and alarm wires (even the latest smoke detectors I installed have a connection so that they can be networked together - if 1 senses smoke all can then go off to wake people on different floors).
    You'll never guess right what you'll need ten years from now, and if you try tooo hard everything will just go wireless. Plan now so that if you have to pull wires later it can be done easily.

  233. What about wiring channels? by ToasterTester · · Score: 1

    Everyone is talking cable and conduit, but what about wiring channels like used in studios or office building. You said drywall wasn't up yet, you'd have time time install the channeling. Then plenty of room to pull cable in the future.

  234. PVC Pipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not run PVC pipe to each of the rooms then when you want to upgrade your cabling you just need to run it through the pipes. It would save you the headache of upgrading later, and would allow you to use cat5 or even cat3 for now.

  235. Wireless by GiMP · · Score: 2

    Why not use wireless?

  236. Home Automation standards by jhines · · Score: 1

    The current thinking on home automation is to run qty 2 coax runs (rg6 quad sheild) and qty 2 cat-5 wires.

    This gives you video in and out capabilities. If you need more than that, get a 3 channel RF modulator (settable channels) and put the video on a common cable as an RF signal.

    Again if you need more lan cabling think of putting a hub in at each end of the wire, rather than running bunches of cabling. All the wiring runs back to central point where you have your splitters, amps, hubs, etc.

    This is what I'm doing, and using one cat-5 for lan and the other for 2 phone lines, and a stereo line level feed.

    Note that the standard for wiring up lans currently doesn't use the inner pair, which can be used as a phone connection, although it isn't prefered. (use a different jack for phone).

    I found it impossible to pull this through 1/2" flexible metal conduit, so I'd suggest 3/4" up front. Metal conduit isn't required by code in most cases, howerver it does offer physical protection, RFI protection, and is upgradeable in the future.

    That is this weekends (week, month, qtr...) project.

    1. Re:Home Automation standards by rhost89 · · Score: 1

      I just automated my house earlier this year.

      What i ran was 2 x rg6 (1 in 1 out or 2 in or 2 out)
      3 cat5e (2 x 10/100 and 1 split into 2 phone lines)

      What i found out was this house was very easy to wire, it was built in 85 and i had no problems drilling a access hole through the end cap in the attic and running everything to a wiring closet, plus if i want to drop anything else, fiber, svid, rca, etc... its pretty much a simple drop and pop in a few plugs into the plates. Other then the X11 stuff, all i needed was a few Old work boxes, wire, wallplates, and i was good to go.

      --
      I will bend your mind with my spoon
  237. I just built a house by CyPlasm · · Score: 1

    I moved into my new house in May and ran cat5e.

    First, make sure it's ok with your builder. My builder didn't want me to do it because they were worried about the type of job I might do and the house still needed to be inspected by the city after the electrician came.

    Second, two drops per room is not enough! Depending on how big your house is, you should be able to do 4 drops per room with a 1000' spool. My house is 2800 square feet and I still had about 300' feet leftover.

    Third, if you're going to put in cat5e, might as well go ahead and put in RG6 as well. I put in two drops per room (one for cable, the other for satellite) and I'm sure glad I did. That way, the installers that work for the cable company don't have to drill a bunch of holes in the outside walls to install cable tv to the room. Besides, you might find other uses for it and the cost for 1000' feet (~$50) is about the same for 1000' of cat5e.

    Fourth, it's easier to cable on inside walls than outside walls because it's difficult to find the cable on the outside wall due to the insulation. I had detailed documentation on where everything was but still couldn't find one of my drops because the insulation was hiding it. Do inside walls only if you can.

    Fifth, make sure you document everything VERY well. You don't want to think you're in the vicinity of where the cables are and then find out you are off by a few inches. Just in case this happens, leave plenty of wire at the "end" (where it is going to be plug in the wall) so that if you are off, you can move it to the new hole. I took plenty of pictures with my digital camera and also took plenty of measurements.

    If I could do it again, there would be few things that I would do differently. Mainly, I would have added more drops of RG6 and chosen only inside walls for the drops because of the difficulty in locating them inside the insulation.

  238. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by forsaken33 · · Score: 1

    The only thing with STP is that if your installer doesn't know what know what he or she is doing.....it gets messy. All that nice shieiding......think a nice big antenna. MAKE SURE that shielding is grounded. No, make sure its grounded! Screened twisted pair (ScTP) is a little better. STP has shielding around the whoe cable, as well as each two pairs. Screened just has the outer shield, which works just fien from my experience.

    --
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe =UTF-8&q=. amusing....
  239. Screw Drywall by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

    Just build the wall from the cable and some glue. It'll be insulated because of all that rubber, and you won't have a problem with bandwidth.

    Massive parallelism has its benefits.

    --
    You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  240. Forever playing catchup by robin999 · · Score: 1

    From my experience, however one cables (or builds a netword etc) everything will need to be redone in n years. Trying to build the perfect system to last 20 years is a waste of time. Just build the best you can afford now, and enjoy planning the next big upgrade.

    I just put cat-5 into all the kids bedrooms, along with video coax. The cat-5 runs to a 100M switch, and carefully avoids (or crosses at right angles) any 240 Volt electrical mains cables. (We use 240 V in Australia). Everything is running like a charm, for now (except getting SAMBA talking to mt NT box, grumble grumble), but I know
    that one day it'll all be replaced with the next big thing.

    I think I'll wait for quantum cabling. You know? The one that simultaneously sends every possible packet from and to every possible IP address. The reality eigenfunction collapses it neatly to the packet that you really did receiver (in this reality) elegantly discarding the others because they never in fact existed.

    Trouble is that crosstalk can land you in an ugly alternative reality! Emailing mom one minute, being dissected on planet Zoltar the next!

  241. Access floors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AAnother option is to use 'access floors' [http://www.scanfloor.dk/uk/index.htm] where you run all the cables under a removable floor.
    This enables you to get a network- and a power plug anywhere you want it, and not just along the walls.
    So if you want a computer in the middle of the room, you just pull up the connections you need.

    This does give a limited selection of floors / carpets, thou.

  242. No-one Mentioned This by philovivero · · Score: 1

    Many posters say put in extra drops because you can't think of everything.

    No-one recommends putting a drop near the ceiling in each room.

    Think about it. If you forget something in a room, and you have to string wire from one corner to the other, across a doorway, you don't want wire laying on the floor where you have to tape it down (ugly) or run it under the carpet (hard). Easiest is to run the wire up to the ceiling, over the door, and back down again at the appliance.

    Why not reduce the ugliness by *STARTING* the drop at the ceiling, running it around the room, and then down to the appliance?

    Just a thought.

  243. Don't need any more hubs by itwerx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You only need as many hubs/ports as you have live connections. Leave the rest disconnected.

    Or do other things with them:

    - intercom
    - security system
    - bundle pairs (to get enough wire-gauge) and have whole-house audio
    - data-collection (e.g. thermostat, weather-station etc.)

    Cat-5 provides good, clean signal over a variety of wavelengths - the possibilities are endless.

  244. Cable bundles available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can buy cable bundles with 2 coax, 2 fiber, and
    2 Cat5e cables in a single package.

    They even had it at my local Home Depot for a while,
    but they don't have it any more.

    Check out the cables on http://www.smarthome.com/comptele.html

  245. Probably a no-go on Fiber by levin · · Score: 1

    You should probably not go with fiber. The only advantage fiber really gives you over copper is range. You can get gigabit copper just as easily and much more cheaply than gigabit fiber, you just can't run it reliably more than maybe 150 meters. Besides, if you run fiber you will have to be careful not to bend it too far; fiber works like reflections in a lake, if you're on the edge of the lake you can see the reflection, but you cannot if you are directly above it. Light bounces off the edges of the straight fiber, but if you bend it the signal will be "looking down at the lake" and it won't bounce off. You probably won't be need to bend fiber enought to make a real difference, but if you don't want to worry about loosing your signal due to a few kinks, just go with copper.

    The only thing you need to worry about with running the copper all in one big hunk with the phone line is the possiblity of crosstalk. This is due to the magnetic field generated by one wire inducing current in another wire, creating a false signal. This really isn't a big problem unless you have a load o'wires(r) slapped together, but try to locate your central connection endpoint (hub/switch and router, whatever you have) somewhere in the middle of your home. That way you can spiderweb your copper in the directions of the different rooms and never have more than 4 or so lines bundled together.

    --

    `which fortune`
  246. Conduit the most flexible way to do it. by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

    Running two category 5e cables to every room is a good idea. Also, running at least one RG-6 grade coax cable to every room is a good idea, if not two. Fiber is a bit debatable at this point, especially since putting the ends on a fiber cable is a real bitch and the cable is very very fragile.

    If cost is not an object at all and you want maximum expandibility for anything then run conduit. If you do that then regardless of what different types of cable may be encountered you can simply pull the cable through the conduit (assuming the conduit is large enough).

    Another option would be one of the all-in-one cables that usually have two cat 5, two RG-6 and sometimes one or two fiber lines. Doing a preliminary search brings up smarthome.com which may be able to answer some of your questions and provide you with different types of cabling, including the all-in-one types.

    The important thing is to run all the cable to a centralized wiring closet where you can put such things as ethernet switches, cable TV splitters, etc. Be SURE to run your cable TV this way. It's a hell of a lot easier to run cables if every cable going to every room ends in one centralized place. If they need to bring in more cable drops they can just run them into that centralized place and you can do any wiring or rewiring there. The same goes with conduit. If you run conduit just run it all to a central wiring closet and you can do everything from there.

    Believe me, you want to be sure that you put high-quality RG-6 coax in. Digital cable/satellite TV requires high-grade coax and RG-6 is the way to go. There is one type which is even more high-grade which is RG-11, but you usually don't need that unless you are running a cable for many many hundreds of meters (very unlikely inside of a house).

    Also on the coax front be sure to use good fittings. Brass is the way to go. I suggest something of the snap-n-seal variety, or a compression fitting. Installation of either of these types requires a special tool, but the signal will be much better than with the cheap-ass radio shack fittings crimped on with a pair of pliers.

    Also, don't finish your basement. It's a basement, you're SUPPOSED to be able to see the inner-workings of the house. If it's just absolutely not acceptable to be seeing the water pipes or electrical or whatever when you look up at the ceiling in the basement then at least use a drop ceiling of some type. I highly recommend against a dry-wall ceiling in a basement. Usually the only reason a basement is finished is so that it can be included in the square footage of the house's finished areas which is really a cop-out because after all, it's a basement, not a real floor.

    Anyway, that is my $0.02

  247. Fiber == good by itachi · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure where you got the impression that fiber was flaky, unreliable, or a pain... It is expensive, but relative to the cost of building a house? We have many many miles of fiber infrastructure at work, multi-mode and single-mode, and it is the most reliable and solid part of the network. Literally, in the last two years there have been two fiber related outages - one was a backhoe and a bad map of the fiber plant, and the other was a steam tunnel explosion. The steam tunnel took out everything in that wiring closet, fiber plant, copper plant, hardware, walls... The fiber also doesn't have to be replaced to support a faster connection - in order to swap out an old 10Mbit coax repeater, we need to replace all of the coax runs with 5e runs, but the same fiber plant will be able to feed 10Mbit, 100Mbit, or 1000Mbit just as easily. In addition, you can get any of those over a much higher distance that you can with copper. Copper will only get you 100 meters at 10 or 100, where fiber can get you long hauls.

    Of course, fiber in a house does seem a bit overkill with today's tech, but with 10 years of tech, or 20 years... I would say that the relatively small (against the cost of a house) cost of fiber in the house might significantly add to the future value of the house.

    itachi

  248. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by TimX · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is true.
    I just did my own wiring in the house that I just bought a month ago. I ran Cat5e, because it much more inexpensive and I design and install LAN/WAN equipment, and deal with fiber everyday. I hate fiber. The Transceivers along will run you $900 per end, that's a minimum $1800 per drop. Plus you will need to by the switches.

    Why do that when you can buy a four port Gigabit UTP switch for less than $300 and Gigabit nic's for $44.

  249. Don't forget the pictures by _Chainsaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No matter what you run eventually you will forget exactly how and where you ran it... before the drywall goes up go into each room and take pictures of every wall and the ceilings, these can be a major time saver when trying to find wiring, studs etc. later on.

    I'm with the guys that are reccomending running coax... you can never have enough cable TV jacks..put on in every wall. (Honey, can't we put the couch over there and the TV over there???? No, there's no cable TV jack.)

    If you live in an area where ceiling fans are commonly used have a box put in the ceiling of every room and the multi-gang switch boxes in the walls... major pain in the ass to try and put these in later.

  250. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by LinuxOnHal · · Score: 1

    I believe the limitation is actually 30 meters, which is a pretty good distance. It really depends on the size of the house though, because that is about 3 times less than the maximum distance of 100 Megabit ethernet.

    --
    Trying is the First Step to Failing --Homer Simpson
  251. RUN LOTS OF COAX by baomike · · Score: 1

    I now wish I had run three runs of RG6 to each room from the garage.
    One for local cable feed.
    One for Dish network.(receiver in garage ((UHF remote))
    One for ExpressVu the Canandian satellite service.
    This in addition to a run of Cat5 to each room.

    Tip on phone line: run a line thru most of the walls and leave slack in the wire . if you need a
    new outlet cut a hole and fish the wire to the
    box.

  252. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by ryanvm · · Score: 2

    It will be a little more expensive, but you might want to think about stringing "STP" CAT5, instead of UTP... that's Shielded Twisted Pair instead of Unshielded.

    I'm by no means an expert on the matter, but a few years ago I did a lot of reading about comparisons between different cabling methodologies (UTP, STP, coax, etc).

    The interesting thing about STP is that you'd think that the shielding could only help. However, unless you ground it, the long stretches of shielding can actually make interference worse by acting like a giant antenna.

  253. Todays fiber is not future proof by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 3, Informative

    The question is should I run fiber? I really don't know how much the cable costs since I don't know what cable to use. It is much easier to run cable
    before the drywall goes in so I want to make an informed decision now. Ten years from now will I need/want fiber?"


    The only reason to run fiber is if the needed cable length, exceed recommended CAT5e length.
    Fiber has several disadvantages (I am no cable expert); Connectors; There is a plethora of competing connectors. The most common; SC and ST connectors are rather bulky, and doesn't really work beyond 1Gbps. The new breed of small form connectors for >1Gbps hasn't been certified yet.
    If you plan to run fiber "end-to-end", you will have a really limited supply of products to choose from, pay premium prices, and to some extent be tied up with
    with whatever connector you choose to begin with.
    Changing or making the end-termination on fiber, is much more expensive on fiber, than on copper. (the SMF connector "VF-45" from 3M claims to be the cheapest to use, when doing end-to-end fiber).

    The price difference between even a managed 24p 100TX switch and a 24p 100 FX (fiber) switch is significant. The price on 1000 SX fiber equipment is also much higher than 1 GBIC copper equipment.

    We just evaluated upgrading our fiber backbone from 10Mbit to either 100FX or 1000SX. (we run a non-profit ISP for 300 apartments), and the price difference between a using a fiber or a copper core switch is very high indeed. If it wasn't for the fact, that our cable length requirements exceed Cat 5e/6, it would probably be cheaper to abandon the fiber and re-wire with copper.

    Using fiber-converters (transceivers) also sucks; they cost too much (one needed for every connected device), is yet another source for network problems, and requires yet another power plug.

    Actually I believe, that the money saved from investing in fiber and fiber equipment now, could pay for a totally fiber re-wiring if the need for such really should arise into the future.

    I really think you will be much better off using copper. People in the know claims, that even though Class D/Cat 6 (200MHz) isn't certified as a standard yet (?), the commercial "Cat 6" cabling systems availably now, should conform to the coming standard. So Cat 6 should be a much better long term investment than fiber. AFAIK Cat 6 should do 10Gbps. Again, people who knows much more than I do, claims that the present standard for multi mode fiber (50 and 62,5 Micron)
    doesn't do more than 1,2 Gbps reliably, and is a "dead" standard like Cat 5, and 5e. The coming fiber standards /type (10Gbps) probably named "Laser optimized multimode fiber" LOMMF or OM3 is still in the works.

    To summon up;
    Cat 5e is the cheap and tried solution. If future needs doesn't go beyond 1Gbps, then why not.

    Cat 6 is slightly more expensive, but is much more "future proof" (10Gbps). Perhaps one is still advised to buy a complete system, from the same vendor though.
    It allready seems, that Cat 6 rapidly has become the choice when people wire new offices.

    Present day fiber standards are not future proof (1,2Gbps), too expensive; not only the fiber cabling systems, but all devices that need to connect with it, and is probably something best left to a professional electrician to install.

    Peoples advice about conduit and pull wires, are probably the real key to a long term investment.
    A cheap ethernet tester will probably pay for it self too, if you are going to make a lot of cables.

  254. Check with your builder.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    I inquired about the same thing here in Ohio when building my house. The builder would not let me do anything but the stuff on the work equity list. I asked about Cat 5 and running some RG-58 (for Amateur Radio) myself and they said NO extra wiring period. If I did add it, I would not have gotten my FHA approval since I do have a FHA loan.

    Personally, even with the security issues with Wi-Fi, I would rather use it. Much more flexible and you can always setup as VPN gateway on the access point. It's much more flexible and if you decide you NEED your laptop when your on the crapper then you can do it (not that I would do it, but hey I know SOMEONE might someday!). Besides, when I get my laptop and Wi-Fi stuff, I can surf the web on a nice day out on my deck. That's just plain cool! :)

    On a side note, all of my phone cabling IS Cat-5. I can steal a pair off of it since I am only using one for voice and it would work. When I decide to excise the phone and ONLY use a mobile phone, then I can just add a hub on the other side of the wall from where the demarc boax is.

    --

    Gorkman

  255. What I did by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Informative
    First of all, you've got the (potential) advantage of new construction. In my case, when I was shopping for a house this summer, one of the things I was looking for was a single-story house, so I could have access to all the walls from the attic. (In Austin you can't have a basement without using lots of dynamite.) With new construction, your best bet would be lots of 1" inner diameter PVC conduit going all over the house to empty electrical boxes. Make sure they don't run parallel to the electrical wires!

    What I did was pull eight drops of six cat-5 and one RG-6 to six rooms. (Actually only seven RG-6 drops because I ran out.) I used up most of two 1000 foot boxes.

    Don't pull single wires, pull bundles. When I had the holes drilled and the weather was cool enough to stay in the attic all day, I pulled the wire from both boxes through the house, along with the RG-6, then folded the end over and did it again twice. I used cheap box tape to hold the wires together in the interim, then I used cable ties to tie it together into one evil looking snake. It just barely fits in a 1" hole. So far I haven't crimped the ends of the RG-6, but when I do start using it, I'll just stuff the extra cat-5 keystone jack back into the wall.

    In two of the drops, I didn't have to drill because there was no drywall over the cabinets (nowadays the ceilings go in first, so I was lucky), and in another, there was already a hole where I wanted it. The last hole was the toughest because it was on an outside wall, the roof about three feet above me. I cut a hole for three-inch pipe in my closet, giving nine times the area of a 1" hole, just right for eight bundles and the outside wiring, then put a pipe and a right angle joint at the top. The hole was cut well enough that the whole thing fits snugly with no glue or plaster.

    Assorted bits of advice: Forget about fiber, it's too much of a pain in the arse for home use. The only fiber you want is one strand going out of your house (dream on!). And besides, there are two diameters, and single vs multi-mode, but cat-5 is cat-5. Don't forget about the RG-6, because that means you can have cable/satellite in any and every room in the house. And if you buy wood bits, get 1" bits, and get them made in the USA with lifetime warranty. Wal-Mart sells these for under three bucks each. The crap from China won't last for more than one or two holes. Ultrasonic stud finders kick ass. Wig pins are good for pushing through drywall to find out the exact point of a stud, both on walls and ceilings. Not all horizontal studs in your attic are directly over the wall; if you're not careful, you'll drill out the top of a wall or even worse, paneling. (Yes, I did drill out some paneling. That's how I know.)

    Switched 100mbit Ethernet in the kitchen kicks ass. And it means you get to use more AC circuits for those big LAN parties.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  256. Wireless Access Point Drops by dfranks · · Score: 1

    Remember to put a couple of drops in ceilings in places that would provide ideal coverage for 802.11 access points. Ceiling mounted access points provide better coverage (fewer furniture and appliances to go through) and you will do wireless sooner or later.

  257. Take Pictures by dkresge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't stress the importance of FFFish's comments enough. Make certain to take pictures (digital cameras are great) of *every* cable run in *every* wall before the rock goes up. It's so much easier to be able to have an "x-ray" view of your house when doing additions in the future. Additionally, it's a nice resale point for prospective future buyers ("and, should you ever want to upgrade, here is a look behind the walls").

    As for the original question, skip the fiber -- go 2 RG6 and 2 CAT5 to each room, and run flexible conduit for future expansion (don't forget to run a length between the attic and the first floor/basement -- it'll save you)

    -D

  258. distance is wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    use the national electrical code standard of 'between plug' distances.
    more than this is going to fill your house with
    more EM radiation than necessary, make weird
    EM interference when you try to add ethernet cable
    (parlell with power wiring = weird problems) because
    you dont have enough distance. well in theory anyways.

  259. I installed conduit in my new home... by Beatlebum · · Score: 2, Informative

    Four years ago I purchased a new home in Alameda (SF Bay Area). A friend of mine recommended that I go with home-run conduit to every room. I eventually did get my conduit, however, I had to fight the builders who did not want to do anything out of the ordinary. They tried to snow-job me by claiming conduit was against residential code, so I called the inspector and he told me it was fine for low voltage wiring. Eventually I wore them down and I got my conduit. I think it cost around $1500 for 8 home runs in a 2700 sq foot house. If you do manage to get conduit it is important that you

    1) Get the largest diameter possible. I got 1.5".
    2) Ensure that the turn radius is as large as possible i.e. the conduit should take sweeping turns rather than tight turns because the increase in friction will make it very hard to pull cable. Remember that cat5 cable is only certified up to a pulling force of around 15lbs.

    After the house was completed my wife and I spent 2 weekends pulling Cat5e (lucent is the best) and RG6. We pulled 5 cat5 runs to each downstairs room and garage and 3 to the upstairs. In each case 1 cat5e supports up to 4 phone lines. Special conduit lubricant is a must, it's designed to make the pulling easier and keeps the wires lubricated after the fact. Of course a good quality fish-tape is a must, don't go cheap. The runs are terminated in my den, obvisouly you should pick a central location. In the den I have a server cabinet and a rackmount switch and a patch panel for the LAN and phone lines. The switch is connected to a firewall/router which is connected to a cable modem. You can plug a machine in anywhere in the house & DHCP will get you an IP and an internet gateway. I also have a couple of Audiotrons to stream music from my server.

    I did all the cat5 wiring myself. The trickiest part is terminating the cables, a cat5 circuit tester will save you a lot of time, of course you will also need all the crimping tools, wire strippers etc. I used Pandiut components throughout for the connectors, faceplates etc, their stuff is modular and well designed. A good guide to all this stuff is "Mike's Basic Guide to Cabling Computers & Telephones in Homes & Apartments"

  260. Having just built a house ... by SiriX2k1 · · Score: 1

    Hi, I've just about finished getting my house built .. and whilst doing the electical side of things i got a mate round and we put cat5e into 3 rooms of the house, two bedrooms & the lounge ... also got A/V put into two bedrooms too .. but personly i dont think you will find the need for Optic Fiber ... with the way Wireless is headed .. id say in the not so distant future you might end up running all wireless and getting if not the same speeds .. probably very close to the same speeds as fiber ... and because it's in a local area not over a long distance or anything i dont think you'd have much toworry about with lag etc ... id just keeplayin' the cat5e ... it's cheap .. but also get A/V ... as it can be very handy. eg. relaying that new DiVX/DVD to the lounge ... etc.. ;) or .. just think of what your guests will say when you've got music crossfading with Visual's on your big-screen.. with the help of Winamp/XMMS anyway's .. that's my thoughts .. hope it helps .. P.S. ... if you can afford Optic Fiber .. and the equipment to go with it ... why not!

  261. Conduit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Don't run only cable. Run conduit. There are a bunch a variations, but the one I ran is 1" diameter, plenum rated, conduit to every room (actually, more than one to most rooms), home runned back to a "wiring closet" in the basement. I had the contractor run a couple of lengths of string through every run and tied off both ends. That way, no matter what I end up needing, it's a matter of tying off to a string and pulling it through.

  262. PVC and the environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PVC is nasty stuff, cancer cancer cancer.
    read the web about it. there is a movement to phase it out.

    alternative? damned if i know.
    someone said 'use steel'. jesus what a pain
    in the butt, but it seems it might be better.

    1. Re:PVC and the environment by GSloop · · Score: 1

      Sheesh - you don't eat fast food do you? Cause this is lots more likely to kill you...

      Sure, there's lots of stuff that's going to kill you, but for most Americans, and other first world people, smoking, high fat diet, no exercise and stress are going to do you in lots faster than stuff like PVC. (even if there is a threat, which I'm not at all sure there is...)

      So, if you don't want to use PVC, be my guest, but it's lots more likely I'll die from my own bad habits long before then...

    2. Re:PVC and the environment by Tassach · · Score: 2
      So, if you don't want to use PVC, be my guest, but it's lots more likely I'll die from my own bad habits long before then...


      The issue isn't whether or not PVC cable is dangerous -- it's whether or not it meets code. When you go to sell your house, it will be a real bitch when the home inspector writes you up for building code violations and the buyer's mortgage company makes you tear it all out (or replace it) before they approve the loan. Do the job right the first time and it will increase the value of your home rather than being an expensive liability. Home improvement is NOT the place to go cutting corners -- your home is probably the biggest investment you'll ever make, and only a fool would fail to protect that investment.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  263. only if u wanna get shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    physically separate power and data cables.
    thus, you will never get electrocuted and die
    due to dicking around with your computer.

    think about it, all the electrical codes are
    about preventing mechanical contact/rubbing/cracking/cutting/scratching
    of power-carrying cables. if the cables are
    in separate physical spaces, they cannot
    come into contact.

  264. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


    Uh, STP is 150 ohm cabling typically used for token ring. It doesn't meet the TIA 568 standards although you can use it with ethernet if you use baluns (ugh). Generally speaking, STP is not for ethernet.

    maru

  265. Plenum by shepd · · Score: 2

    Lots of mis-information about plenum cabling here.

    Plenum cabling doesn't necesarialy burn less all the time.

    Plenum cabling is desgined to burn less in certain directions.

    IIRC, plenum means it won't burn sideways as well as upwards. If you want the other cable, I think you need "riser" cable (or something like that). If you plan to do this in an office building, this is a good time to find out. Otherwise they may make another crappy OJ Simpson movie.

    Where I live, if your house is made with wood, you can put in any comm. cable you like (as long as it doesn't give off toxic fumes without burning! ;-). Why? Because if there's a fire in a wood house you have a lot more to worry about than some lame-ass cabling.

    The only exception (again, for where I live) is that you have to use special cabling for running cable through air-ducts.

    But, once you move into offices, you _really_ need to watch those laws. The fire inspector will bust your ass if you run the wrong FT-rating cable. (IIRC, FT-5 for plenum spaces, FT-4 for anywhere else in offices).

    BTW: This may be incorrect for your area, and I refuse to claim responsibility if you use the wrong cable and cause harm to anything with your use of it.

    Note: Plenum is availiable for almost any cable. UTP, STP, coax, power, you name it.

    Careful grounding your STP -- over very long distances (like many floors in an office building) a ground differential can cause HUGE current loops through your ground. I've heard stories about ground jackets setting on fire in runs from the top floor to the basement in office buildings.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Plenum by Tower · · Score: 1

      One way to combat the ground loops (this is done on some special audio cables, too) is to only have the shield grounded on one end connector instead of both... The entire cable remains shielded and tied to ground, but there can be no AC/DC current passed from one component to another.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  266. fiber costs by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


    Fiber is pretty pricey per foot but the termination is a killer. You'd have to have a contractor do it to be cost effective. The connectors (something like a Siecor Uni-cam) are around $30 bucks a pop, the termination kit to be able to put them on runs around $600, and it takes about 10 connectors worth of practice to be able to do it properly.

    maru

  267. Talk to the insurance company! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They usually aren't happy about cable in HVAC in houses!

    If your house burns down, you want your insurance to be valid.

  268. Wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the walls are not up yet, run conduit. If done properly it will allow you to pull cat5, fiber, etc thru.

  269. PVC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use PVC.....run it down through the walls, you can always ugrade your cable later....without worry of pulling the other cable out.

    Believe me it works, very nifty little trick....and not too expensive.

  270. OT: Use plenum by mosch · · Score: 5, Informative
    This isn't directly on topic, but it's important so I wanted to make sure you read this.

    USE PLENUM

    Yes, it costs more, but it meets building code, and isn't nearly so flammable. Please don't be cheap and use the PVC stuff that will help housefires spread wonderfully just to save $100.

    1. Re:OT: Use plenum by Siva · · Score: 1

      isn't nearly so flammable

      don't forget that PVC is way more toxic when it burns...

      --Siva

      --

      Keyboard not found.
      Press F1 to continue.
    2. Re:OT: Use plenum by [Mobius] · · Score: 1

      I was pretty sure plenum and PVC burned the same, the difference being that PVC gives off toxic smoke whereas plenum doesn't.

      Plenum is required for in-wall (ceilings included) cabling or the fire marshall will have your ass.

      --
      M
    3. Re:OT: Use plenum by erwin · · Score: 1

      Actually, Plenum-grade cable is only required when running cable through air-handling spaces. Suspended ceiling in office spaces are often used this way, and during a fire situation PVC vapors would be spread around. That's why non-toxic grade sheathing is required in these spaces.

      I don't believe that you need plenum grade sheathing in non-air handeling walls. Typically in a fire situation, the fumes released from burning carpet and furniture are much more of the problem than a relativly small amount of cable sheathing.

      That said, if you can afford to install plenum-grade cable, go right ahead - it's only money and if it buys you some piece of mind, great. Your electrician might not be happy with you, though, because the teflon sheathing of plenum-grade cable is much stiffer and harder to work with.

    4. Re:OT: Use plenum by mosch · · Score: 2

      go outside, lay down some pvc and some plenum next to each other, turn on a propane blowtorch. that'll clear up your misconception that the only difference is toxic fumes. there's also a difference in flash point and burn rate.

  271. Let the Electrician Do It by smack.addict · · Score: 2
    Have the electrician who is wiring your phones do it. A lot of times these guys run cat3 for phone, you can get him to run cat5 for both phone and ethernet and get it all over with at once.


    Fiber is probably a waste of time, but maybe not.

  272. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by mosch · · Score: 2

    STP has nothing to do with whether or not the outer jacket is PVC or plenum. UTP plenum is widely available, and widely deployed. Shielded cable makes for a nightmare of floating grounds that most people don't deal with properly.

  273. Speedwrap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A link was posted in a previous post to a product called SpeedWrap. That is one of many companys that make a bundled wire.

    This is the *right* way to do it. All new houses that are designed with fairly recent tech in Stereos, Televisions, Computers, and telephone use this type of wiring.

    You can get it in just about any configuration, an example would be Cat-5, Coax, Fiber, and twisted pair. You can get as many of whatever type of connection you want.

    If you are having a contractor do the electrical, he will most likely recommend this or recommend you to a company that specializes in wiring houses for multi-media.

    The additional advantage of a combined cable is that you just run everything everywhere. There is no 'well should I run fiber to the wherever', it is all there.

    Plus it will be easier to explain to your wife why there is Cat-5 running to the bathroom.

  274. Power & AC by Ratbert42 · · Score: 2

    Don't forget to consider your power and air conditioning needs. My office is pushing the limits of both.

    1. Re:Power & AC by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
      Good point

      When I did my home office, I had the electricians put in 'quad' grounded outlets and 20-AMP circuits all around.

      The cost for quads isn't much more than the cost for the usual 2-outlet boxes, and makes finding a spare outlet for additional systems much easier. The use of 20A breakers means that you are that much more likely to trip the 10/15A circuit breaker on a power strip before you trip a breaker down at the main panel.

      You might also consider a whole house surge protector.

  275. I'm doing the same thing, but... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    I'm planning on surrounding both my phone wires and my cat5e with RF shielding. Figure it'll save me a lot of money in lost modem bandwidth.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  276. 10 years from now... by maunleon · · Score: 1

    .. wireless will have caught up with wired speed.

    You are just paying for the next five years. Then your fancy CAT5 or fiber or whatever will be useless.

    I would even predict that 10 years from now we would already have seen the emergence of a city-wide wireless internet in most areas. Your wireless connections will hook up directly into the backbone.

  277. re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the wire run Conduit then in the future you can yank anything into the pipe. I'm a electrician and that's how I'd do my own house. Trust me don't matter what you run you'll wish you had run something else someday. 3/4 inch conduit is cheap.
    This house I'm living in now has been wired for various things over the yeas but there is not a inch of pipe in the place so that's always a pain...

  278. Why Cat5? by ziegast · · Score: 1

    Cat 5 can easily handle 100Mbps traffic and phone traffic. Remember when Cat3 was the new thing compared to old Ma Bell twisted pair? That got stuck in alot of homes as phone wiring before 100baseT came out. Those people are now limited to 10Mbps or AnyPoint-like technologies. People who installed Cat5 are happy today. People who install Cat5 today will be happy today, but what about tomorrow?

    There may be a day when some broadband provider drops off a >100Mbps cable to your curb for $50/month. There may be a day when home entertainment will take advantage of Gigabit Ethernet or Infiniband over twisted pair or whatever the next technology is. I recommend that you get spools of Avaya Gigabit now. The price difference is only about $50-$60 per spool over Cat5, and you're probably lumping this expense into a mortgage, so you're not likely to see the difference. Also, it assures you that you're putting in quality cabling. You have no idea what brand/quality of Cat5 cable your contractor is going to install.

    Find yourself a good contractor. This contractor will have installed many homes before and might even have some active tract home contracts now that Cat5 is catching on. They'd not specialize in just Cat5, but also coax, telco, and security wiring. They would also make sure they install not just the cable, but the right jacks and wall plates at each location. I can't tell you how much time it wastes if you have to install your own jacks.

    Have one set of twisted pair go mostly to a phone punch block (110 or 66, doesn't matter) and have the other be terminated (TIA-568A) into a TIA-568A 110-block with ethernet RJ-45 outlets.

    Consider also instaling dual RG6 (coax cable) while you install your dual ethernets. Just like your ethernet an phone wiring, you'll want to centralize the place from where you want your lines run. You never know if/when your cable company will require two cables to get more channels. You never know if you or the next owner will become a satellite+cable channel junkie.

    As for fiber, well, there aren't many proven applications for it, and it's more expensive, and there are fewer people out on the market who can do it right.

    I think someone else mentioned using metal conduits around your wiring. I agree, though it might be pricey.

    If your wiring is very important to you, and if you plan to spend more than 5 years in this house, the extra money you pay in your mortgage to get the job done right is well worth it. If you plan to flip the house after two years, just install two cat5 and one coax to each bedroom and each work/play area to be done with it.

    Also, don't forget elsectrical outlets! It sucks to have all your ethernet bundles available in a space where you have no electrical outlets for your network gear and computers. Doh! The outlet near the central point of your wiring be better off with it's own 15-amp fuse.

    -ez

    PS: As an alternative, there's always wireless. Consider how/where you'd want to install wireless bridges. Consider the security implications, too.

    1. Re:Why Cat5? by philipsblows · · Score: 1

      An interesting article here about running gigabit ethernet over Cat5 wire. It sounds like planning ahead now will leave the possibility open a few years out.

      The article is pretty clear that going beyond gigabit on those wires is not likely, but it seems that buying good cable and setting it up correctly now will pay off without adding a lot of up-front expense with Cat6 or Cat7 or whatever else might be coming along.

  279. Tips for Pre-existing home? by dgrage · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen much posted regarding homes already built. Any tips you could pass along? I want data feeds (Cat5) mostly, with a few audio streams, too. How difficult is it to run conduit on a two story home? I suspect I can drop down good feeds from the attic, but when were trying to run to the main floor things might get ugly. Any sites that cover such issues? TIA

  280. Correction: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a mini-switch, not a mini-hub.

  281. what you really want is conduit by neuroxmurf · · Score: 1

    Running 1/2" EMT conduit is pretty easy, and gives you absolute future-proofing. You'll probably own your home for 20 or 30 years. Would you have predicted the need for cat5e in 1971, let alone been able to get it?

  282. Geek House by nuclearsnake · · Score: 1

    There is a team that went into an old house and turned it into any geeks dream-home.
    Here is the link.

    -nuclearsnake

    --
    See the forbiden post Here
  283. run the conduits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to run all the cables right away.
    You'll be much better off by laying
    the strategic conduits. For example run a conduit
    from the basement to the attic (in 2-store house).

    1. Re:run the conduits by cryptophiliac · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, this is the way to go, put some string in each conduit, with a loop on each end, such that, when you're ready to put in whatever wire(s) you attach to the string and pull through (i did this to my 1/3 of a mile driveway)...

  284. Inside wall, but still acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best solution I have come up with is to put in a channel all throughout the house that goes 1-inch in the wall and is covered with a plastic lining so the wall looks flush, put right at the base boards. It is damn hard to do, but it is so simple to add, replace, echange cable from, and it is a simple way to run any kind of cable (stereo, tv, ethernet, etc.) to anywhere in the house, and still be able to change wireing and cable. works well if you live in a place with a steel structure, or concrete walls w floating partitions.

  285. It's better outside the walls. by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    I am thinking of the base of the house where the "firewalls" don't seal and any of mother nature's buck-toothed critters would climb up the wall and use the extra holes and spaces for your cat5 as a free beginning for their "infiltrate and defecate" missions held above your master bedroom, guest room, and little johny's room. The best solution I have implemented in my own installation was to actually modify your house's floors to have 2" x 2" x 2" channels of open space running through the entire house and every 50 feet or so you make meeting place where 3 or more channels meet to a packet mixin' device. It is best you install this before you decide on using Linolium, Hardwood, or tile floor. If you already installed the floor, then you should actually design these channels inside your wall and foot level and they should be covered by a wooded or plastic trim that covers where the floor and the drywall meet. In this case, the drywall shouldn't meet the floor, but be placed off the floor maybe 1.5 inches; you don't want the trim covering too much an area to mak it seem obvious. The channel at floor level should be most precaughtiously made to have no access into the wall because, as you will discover, nature's damndest insects, arachnids, beavers, and gerbils all find a way to chew through something to gain access to your well-insulated abode. At least with your cat5 outside your wall, and most easily accessible, you can have an easy upgrade path and maintenance path. It is a better idea then drilling a simple hole through your walls and stapling the cable on the wall like the modern idiot home-owners(like the fannie-maye boogies), the rode-runner ISP house-call techies, and your everyday "Bob's cheap computer upgrade service" that your idiot brother-in-law calls to your house 'cause his trumpet icon won't work in the Control Panel". You'll just regret it in the long run; hope you die of cancer quickly eh?

    --
    without prejudice
  286. Why ruin a house? by SilentChris · · Score: 2
    Personally, I'd like to echo the statement that a lot of other people have been making around here: why ruin a house with wiring you will need to redo in 5-10 years? Why not just purchase an 802.11b access point now, graduate to bigger standards down the road, and save your walls. Yes, you will be behind the technological curve, but quite frankly, I haven't found many uses in which my home network would have benefitted from more than 11 Mbps (we're talking a network of four or five machines here, not 200 like at work).

    I have all of machines networked wirelessly, with a WinXP/Linux machine serving as a gateway to my cable connection. Simple, no fuss, and no matter where you go inside (and outside) the house, you can always have a connection.

  287. My computer + My room = Me by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    Just thought I'd point this out, since a lot of people would find it amusing. But, of course, a lot of people would probably think I'm trolling, and a lot of people would think I'm offtopic.

    Of course, by saying that, I'm going to be modded "Redundant." Welcome to /.

    We just finished building my house (modular), and I'm moving straight into the basement (being the oldest son doesn't have too many priviledges.)...

    I get to build my own room, so I can do whatever the heck I want with cabling and wiring. It's going to be a large room (about 450 sq ft), so I'm going to use half of it as my lab, where I do my evil experiments. (Well, evil in terms of quality...most of my stuff is just a bad collection of hacks.)

    I'm going to put 6-conductor RJ45 jacks, one live 100base-TX jack, and two 110V sockets, evenly spaced, every 6 ft.

    I'm going to do both the phone and Ethernet over shielded cat5, and I'm pondering what the electrical inspector would say if I put RF shielding around the power cables.

    My computer desk will be in the room, complete with a 100Mb/s switch serving the wall ports.

    The walls are going to be a light pastel green, with tongue-and-groove fake hardwood floor, and I'm going to use indirect flourescant lighting.

    I'm looking at exercise equipment, since the typical geek is no longer overweight

    Oh, and my computer's going to be about four feet away from my bed. If my parents want me outside that room, they'll have to drag me.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  288. Complete wiring guides: by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 5, Informative


    Glad you mentioned this, because it reminded me how difficult it is to find good documentation about wiring Ethernet.

    As a wise Slashdot reader once said, "You can't have too much overkill", so here is the wiring scheme shown 3 different ways. I hope it saves you the time of gathering it together yourself.

    Slashdot doesn't allow the HTML PRE tag. Slashdot removes leading spaces, so I've used dots below. Another problem is that the lameness filter is lame. That lameness filter is definitely named correctly.

    Use only Standard EIA/TIA T568B. This is also called the AT&T specification. T568A is NOT USED.

    T568B:

    When the hook of the RJ-45 Ethernet connector is underneath, pin 1 is on the left.

    Pair 1 is pins 4 and 5, Blue and White/Blue.

    Pair 2 is pins 1 and 2, White/Orange and Orange (Transmit Data + and -)

    Pair 3 is pins 3 and 6, White/Green and Green (Receive Data + and -).

    Pair 4 is pins 7 and 8, White/Brown and Brown.

    /--T21 White/Orange
    Pair2 \--R22 Orange
    /--------- -T33 White/Green
    / /-R14 Blue
    Pair3 \ Pair1 \-T15 White/Blue
    \--------- -R36 Green
    /--T47 White/Brown
    Pair4 \--R48 Brown


    Pin ColorPairName

    1 wh/or 2 TxData +
    2 or2 TxData -
    3 wh/grn3 RecvData+
    4 blu 1
    5 wh/blu1
    6 grn 3 RecvData-
    7 wh/brn4
    8 brn 4


    I know this sounds crazy, but standard Ethernet uses ONLY pairs 2 and 3, for both half and full duplex. The other wires just sit there, unused. (It is possible to buy external adapters to use the other two pairs as a second 10- or 100 Megabit 100Base-T connection.)

    The R1, T1, R2, T2 designations are for telephones. R1 is Ring 1 (the red wire at the telephone box). T1 is Tip 1 (the green wire at the telephone box). Ring and Tip are old names for the telephone wires, but if you talk to a telephone company installer, he or she will use those names.

    Quite obviously, someone messed this up majorly, as in "How can we make this confusing?"

    If you are new to wiring Ethernet start with the simple explanation at Johns Closet (as in wiring closet): Wiring: Color Codes, Terms, and Tools.

    See the Leviton Do and Don't Guides

    See the Wiring Guides at the Leviton Learning Center . See the Residential And Light Commercial Installation Practices (Tia-570 Compliance) [PDF file] guide.

    Also see the wiring specs at FAQS.org: 9.0 Standard EIA/TIA 568 (Use ONLY T568B)

    More information about wiring: Data Communications Cabling FAQ

    Your local store will probably try to charge too much. Shop around for Ethernet cable and connectors. You need the real thing, cable marked "Category 5". Other cable won't work.

    One last thought to those who are new to Ethernet networking. A Hub broadcasts all data to all computers. An Ethernet Switch sends the data only to the computer that where the data will be used. Therefore, switches are faster in cases where the network is sending data between more than one pair of computers at the same time.

    --
    Senator Biden (and Osama bin Laden) say that the Saudi government cannot continue without U.S. support: What should be the Response to Violence?

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  289. Conduit? by fidget42 · · Score: 1

    Have you considered running flexible conduit? A friend of mine did that when he built his house and it was a god send. At the time, 10base2 was the standard, but by the time he wanted to install networking, 100baseT was it. Instead of having to rip out the old wiring, he just ran cat5 through the conduit and Vola! BTW, he also installed some wire pulls (nylon wire on pullies) to make it easier/possible to run the wire at a later date. Have fun!

    --
    The dogcow says "Moof!"
  290. Photons and Electrons by lostchicken · · Score: 1

    Until I use optical interconnects between my AV components, as traces on my computer, and for the wiring to my lights, I see no reason to include fibre in my house.

    CAT 5E/6 is a REALLY great conductor. As some people don't know, you don't need a media converter to pipe non-ethernet stuff down it. Just solder a connector to both ends and use red tape on both ends of the cable (or green tape depending on the warning colour where you live) , to remind you not to plug them into a computer. You can pipe a stereo pair and a video pipe across one line. Or multichannel audio. Or all the phone lines you could ever want.

    If you do this, use plenum. You may overheat the cables, and PVC would burst into flames. Be careful, and nothing above 12VDC.

    Until I have the need to pipe photons from here to there, I'll stick with a really good wire.

    --
    -twb
  291. Tips on wiring a new house. by azieba · · Score: 1

    First off, I build networks (fiber optic, copper). Chances of you using fiber before you move out is slim. Most people live in there homes no more than 20 years before moving. With the cost of fiber, I think you will be content with copper. A home network will run fine on 10Mb, great on a 100 Mb and kind of a waste running 1000Mb. I have several servers, run wierd math calculations and toy around with different OSes. I just built a house and wired it myself. 2-3 Cat5e for network to each room, 2 Cat5e phones, and 1 RG-6 Cable TV coax. With two exceptions -- family room was also wired for surround sound and additional phone/network and CATV and my office has 6 cat5e network and 3 cat5e phones. I even used Cat5e for my security system. I put up a 3 foot wiring rack in my crawlspace in the basement. Ran 3 two inch PVC risers to the attic and then ran 1 inch PVC conduit in the walls. Fiber optic comes in handy with some audio applications and of course data networks. But with risers and conduit, you cauld always add it later (hopefully when the price goes down). Al

  292. just some more info by mmckinstUM · · Score: 1

    I used to do cabling for a few years around Michigan. I mostly did faily large schools and businesses.

    When you are pulling the wire, pull as much as possible. If youre going upstairs or something past two rooms taht need wire pull it for them. Get a bundle taped together and when you reach one roomcut one wire and continue to pull the rest.

    Conduit is not necesary. The only thing we ever used conduit for was for fiber or if a Cat5 would be exposed somewhere. We never used it anywhere that had a drop celing, there are special things you can get to hang the wire on.

    When you pull put some pull string in there. If you ever wanna add some more you simply have to tape a cable to the end of the string, go upstairs and pull.

    Always pull more cable than you will need. Even put one in the bathroom. Who hasnt wanted to surf the net while on the john :)?

  293. Dark wiring is fine by gregm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wire/coax are cheap if you value your time at all. Don't bother with phone wire, use cat5e for phone lines you get more options this way. Run 2 coax and 3 cat5e to way more places than you ever think you'll want to, but you don't have to actually hook them up right away or ever. Use Panduit Mini-com jacks that can be removed from the cover without unwiring them and just terminate what seems reasonable at the present time. Put blank covers on those places that you're sure you'll never need anything and roll the wires up in the box... you will need to connect something to at least one of those ridiculous wires sometime. I put a cat5 jack out on my front porch last summer so I could sit on the porch swing with my laptop. Will run one out by the pool next summer.

    I like to buy different color cat5s and hook up the blues to ethernet, the reds to phone but leave the yellows dark. Everything should be a star (including security/smoke alarms) and should terminate in a nice large closet that has a big piece of plywood on the wall.

    Use cat5 e for security wiring too. Even though a lot of security systems require their circuit to be wired in series this can still be accomplished at the head and you may want change our your security system at some point. You waste a lot of wire this way but you've got more options. Run 3 cat5e and 2 coax to the detached garage, but if it's very far away run a 4 "conductor" fiber out there too and don't forget to run a string or two in that conduit. Even if it's not so far, the fiber won't pass the electrical potential difference that can occur when lighting strikes close to your garage and you'll save your hubs/switches.

    I've done a lot of this and even by being anal as hell there's always some place I miss. It's not at all unreasonable to put a mile of cat5 in a small house. Also buy as many boxes of wire as your biggest run (most conductors). That way you can run all the wires simultaneously and they'll look better when you're done. Don't pull on the cat5 very hard at all.... if it's stuck get off the ladder or off the floor and gently massage it into place.

    If you stub a conduit up into the attic make damn sure you insulate and seal the top of it. In a factory I wired, the electricians had graciously ran conduit from the attic down all the walls to metal boxes. They left the conduit sticking up through the insulation in the attic so I could stuff/fish my wires down them. They didn't cut them to length up in the attic some were just through the top plate and others were 18" above the insulation. The metal conduit acted like a chimney in the winter, warm air rose up the conduit, hit the cold attic, water condensed, ran back down the conduit and shorted/corroded about 150 jacks (Panuit mini-coms BTW). Ports on the on the phone system began to blow and I couldn't figure out what the hell was happening. Fortunately one of the metal boxes got crushed by a fork truck and I discovered the corroded jack. Upon replacing most of the jacks in the building water actually ran out of some of the boxes when I pulled the covers off.

    In a home where romex electrical wiring is allowed, non-plenum wire should be just fine. Romex is the 12-2 14-3 etc wire that is inside a flatish molded plastic covering. if your building codes won't allow romex and you're house has conduit you better buy the plenum.

    A big UPS in the head is always nice... maybe you should have your electrician run a few "home" runs of 110V to some color coded electrical jacks to get that UPS power up to some of the more deleicate and expensive electronics equipment in your house. Have your electrician put 110V recepticals and light sockets on many of the junction boxes in the attic and crawl/basement... when you have to add a phone line that you forgot you'll be grateful for the handy power and light and it's so inexpensive to do before-hand.

    Run a couple of power home runs to the entertainment center area.... you won't need the amperage but you'll get cleaner power for the tivo.

    That is all.

    No Really that's it.

  294. Fiber Vs. Cat5e by elfhelm · · Score: 1

    I really think a fiber backbone would be sweet but just run cat5e with a gig switch and you will be fine. If for some reason you need more throughput you can always drop a few more runs and channel bond. Have fun ;-)

  295. PVC Piping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use PVC piping. Just like a central Vacuum system, but leading to you wiring closet instead of a vacuum. Now, you can add any cables you want, whenever you want. just make sure you run a string through each of them. Should be cheaper then conduit.

  296. Cat5e isn't always Cat5e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep in mind that merely using Cat 5e cable does not mean that you will have a Cat 5e system. In order to be 5e, the terminations must be done very carefully to minimize untwisting of pairs, and the whole run (including the patch cable) must be checked with a spectrum analyzer.

    Unless you shell out for a specialized data cabling/telecom contractor with a certified Cat5e installer on staff, you're really getting a Cat 5 installation. Not that there's anything wrong with Cat 5 -- you just need to know what you're getting.

  297. SmartHome.com specialty cables by pantaz · · Score: 1

    You need to check SmartHome.com
    Wires, Cables, Jacks
    Guide to Cable Types

  298. Blow-lite is the story by aklobem · · Score: 1

    I'm bout to do a new house, CAT5E is dirt cheap, but if you do ever want fibre drop some blow-lite to the locations and fibre can be blow'n to the drop.

  299. run string by reverse+flow+reactor · · Score: 1

    Go to your local hardware store and buy a hundred metres of twine or string or something. Run that parallel to your phone lines, and tie it off at each end (and LABEL!!).

    That way, if you ever want to add something in the future, you just go to one end, untie the string from the wall, tie it to the new cable (and another piece of string), and pull it through.

    This way you don't have to decide what to run until you need it, and you don't need to open your walls when you add the new wires. Just make sure that you don't have any sharp bends or corners along the path of the string.

    --

    The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them. -Einstein

  300. Wiring by godscheeseburger · · Score: 1

    I did a really light wireing job. I just ran the wires in the supports in the ceiling in the basement (where most of my family's computers are) in the same holes that were drilled to string phone cable, which is in turn hiden by suspended ceiling. I then went to Menard's and bought some resonably priced surface mount panduit and surface mount electrical boxs. I then put then outlet covers on the boxes and put in the snap-in RJ45 jacks. It was rather inexspensive, easy to put up, cosmetically appealing, and it would be easy to upgrade my wiring in need. Unfortunately, I just used some Cat3 I had lying around the house, but still not terrible for a cheap 10BT network.

  301. Phone cable as well? by MobileC · · Score: 0

    I ran cat 5e everywhere - 2 jacks per room - 4 by my desk :)
    The patch panel is in the basement.
    The phone terminates on the patch panel as does my adsl.
    I've got a 4-way splitter cable made up to put the phones (over the cat5) to any of the rooms I want and a 10Mb Hub for the rest of the connections.
    I wasn't worried about sound/tv/whatever.
    If I was I'd go for a 4-way jack per room.

    Next step is a 10/100 switch and wireless for the laptops.

    --

    Fran
    :):):)
    1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

  302. EIGHT bits per byte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you think this is, RS-232? Asynchronous serial communications frames each byte with a start and a stop bit, but other protocols - like V.42 in modems, and ethernet - only put headers and trailers around much larger chinks of data. 1500 bytes in the case of ethernet.

    Now, the ethernet header and trailer are larger (26 bytes total, I think), but that's 2% overhead instead of 25%.

    I don't want to escalate the flames by insulting you back, but using multiple exclamation marks when "correcting" someone erroneously is... a good way to attract ridicule.

  303. Yet more on wiring... by dfung · · Score: 1

    Having pulled a bunch of Cat5 through my house, I think the most important thing that you can do before the walls go up is to make sure that there's a fairly large plastic conduit/wire run that gets you from floor to floor. If your place is multi-level, that's by far the hardest part to do after the sheetrock is up. In addition to pulling the conduit, normally there would also be a number of nylon pull strings put in so you can pull that fat RG-6 coax later.

    A lot of home construction codes are put in place to prevent your house from burning up. A pipe like this is the perfect way to spread fire from floor to floor if it's not done properly, so you want to make sure that that's the case. If you electrician has done data wiring before, you'll probably find that the cat5 that runs between floors is supposed to be "plenum" cabling which has a different sheath (more fire resistant and doesn't let off toxic smoke if it does burn). Yes, of course, plenum cabling costs a lot more. If you put a wire run in like this, I believe that the wires in the pipe are plenum and terminate in punch down blocks at the top and bottom of the tube. You can switch to regular cat5 there.

    A big pipe like this running laterally to the demarc point (your telephone box) may be useful too. These days, the cable TV box is in the same area, so it's useful for TV drops too.

    If you go to Home Depot, they now sell a big fat orange multi-conductor cable (it's about 1" in diameter) for new construction. There's a couple of cat5 sets in there, a couple of rg6 coax and plastic fiber optic as well. I think it's about $0.80/ft.

    I have some rack mount servers and network gear. A lot of this stuff can be incredibly loud (strangely, the loudest thing I have is a Cisco 2924 switch - much louder than a Sun Netra and Compaq Proliant DL380). So you may want to think about identifying a server room. That room will need power, access to the big pipe, and may require additional climate control. You might not want or need it, but again, it's easier to do this now than later.

    Finally, building codes may make it challenging or expensive in a home, but you may want to consider having him pull a separate AC circuit into your server room. If you have a lot of computers in there, then a separate feed (perhaps as big as 30A) will be really nice for a large UPS.

  304. No good reason to use fiber by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Other than bragging rights, fiber in the home is pointless. Your CAT5 can be used with gigbit ethernet NICs and switches to give you performance that is just as good. Your other alternative is to go with 802.11a (high speed wireless). It's faster than the 11 Megs per second (Approx 54 Mbps) that 802.11b gives you and performs better over longer distances. The money you'd spend on fiber should give you more bang for your buck if you use both of the above mentioned approaches in combination. I wired everything up for CAT5 in my house (14 nodes) and I'm a happy camper.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  305. fast ethernet and POTS corrected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello all,

    I want to thank you for


    A: Correcting me about the number of pairs, and

    B: Pointing me towards the documentation that I've been looking for.

    Other posts to this topic have suggested that POTS shouldn't be run too close to ethernet

    Nope

    or no problem
    yup 1

    yup 2

    yup 3

    With the new 2.4 GHz phones, I have given up on telephone wiring to anything but the base

    unit of a multiple remote phone. I am using the Siemens 2420, which works well, but it is

    designed for security in the business. It is impossible to set the unit to allow multiple parties

    to conference w/o the 1st pick up specifically paging the other units. Great for work, but sucks

    for home. I also have tried the power-line remote phone jacks, and they work. Unfortunately where

    I live the radio transmissions are so strong that the signal is quite noisy (OK for a fax machine though).

    I read in a book somewhere that in the specs for NIC design safety the line voltage from POTS will *only*

    fry the NIC, and not the rest of the computer as well. As is usually the case, I can't recall the name.

    Thanks again!!!!!

    Warren

  306. firewire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could firewire be a viable solution?

  307. Think ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is much easier to run cable before the drywall goes in so I want to make an informed decision now. Ten years from now will I need/want fiber?"

    The whole point is that you don't know what you want in 10 years time - just plan for change,make it easy on yourself.

    That being said, only you can decide what you want out of it. Ease of change? No unsightly cables?

    What you know you want:
    Power sockets The cost isn't in the cable, it's the sockets and the work, but two minimum guidelines.

    At least one on each wall/each side of a door.

    At least one every 15ft or so.

    Comms Cable is cheap

    Pull as many cables as you think you need,and then some

    Use CAT5 for everything including your phone.

    Have a wiring closet

    Bottom line is that it's easier to have just one cable/capability type and create your 4-point phone network through the closet than to go "Great, I need another phone in the kitchen, let's see... oh, only Ethernet socket available". Buy some RJ-11/RJ45 converters instead.

    And as for how you want the above things, plus for the things you haven't thought about yet

    Conduits (more expensive than just drilled hole but easy to use)

    Predrilled holes to go through beams without conduits, behind wall, pull-strings to use when the time comes. But it snags, and man.. it aint fun.

    Access panels, fillers - everywhere. Ties in with the earlier minimum requirements; you don't need to populate everything, just make space for it.

    Point is, if you need cable-TV, run a cable. If you suddenly need RCA, run RCA. If you want a doorbell wire to the bathroom, run it there!

    As for fibre, putting it in now is probably a waste of time and money.

    If you have no current need, it really is a waste

    If/when you need it, it's naturally going to be the other standard. Murphy has been right before.

    Whatever you do - do not, I repeat not put cables outside walls and paint over etc. It's ugly, it's inconvenient. the cost saved on making cables invisible get eaten up pretty quickly if you have to redecoreate every 3 months. And if you're married... unsightly cables everywhere carries a less than trivial additional cost.

    There are a zillion ideas for cable management, like hollow floor trim panels which can hide cables, full-blown office-type 4x3" wall-mountable panel/conduits, wireless etc. I doub't you'll want your living room to look like an office though :) It's your house, have fun, and good luck!

  308. Enough chat. Get to Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I read through most of the comments to date. Hmm... I am going throuth the same steps you are right now with my house. Having built the IT systems for three banks and been involved in two other setups, I suggest you not mess arround with two different types of comms cabling (phone/data).

    Cat5e, whether shielded or not will support phone and data service. Wherever you run cable, run four. In larger rooms make sure you have cable outlets in at least two places so that you do not have to run long extensions.

    What I have not seen anyone mention is that if four ports are not enough, you can double up. One cable has 8 pairs, enough for 4 telephone lines or two ethernet lines. Adapters are on the market to allow you to do this without requiring adding new jacks/panels. Therefore, with 4 cables per location, you will not have a capacity problem.

    If you use shielded cat5e, you do not really need to be concerned about electrical cable proximity.

    Fiber is a bitch. Although with fiber, you have a higher theoretical data rate, and no ground loop problems, you have to have very expensive jacks and highly paid specialists to install the stuff. Oh, yes, the adapter cards for the equipment will also be frightfully expensive. Let's not discuss the cost of the switch. Current limit for cat5 is 1Gbit/sec. Cat5e has a 3x higher rating than cat5, but currently it is not utilised. Use copper.

    Run all of the lines to your garage, or someplace that will !NEVER! be used as a living space. A garage is good because noise and beauty are not issues. If you need to rip out the sheetrock, no big deal. Also even the best maintained cable closet is ugly.

    The garage is also good as an endpoint for your telco lines. If the telco runs their lines into your garage next to your cable nest, you can reduce the length of your patch cords. If in the future you decide to install your own small scale pbx, everything is already there.

    As long as we are talking about the telco, make sure you have them install at least 8 pairs between your cable nest and their street box. Buy the cable if the phone guy resists. Even though you may only want two lines today, do you even know what you will need in 5 years? (Fax, kids line, T1 for net access..., Business at home?)

    With the pbx, take a good hard think on this whether you might not want to do this now. A pbx will allow you to make calls between any two phones in your house. It can be set up so that if you have multiple lines, one answering machine can handle all lines. If you have two lines, if line A is busy, all phones can also use line B, etc. A small PBX kit can be had for less than $200.

    Finally, don't waste any more time diddlin'. Buy the cable now and put it in the walls now. If you decide to run 3 or four cables to each location, buy at least that many boxes of cable. You will save enourmous installation costs by pulling the whole bundle at once.

    Cheers

    Elmars Ositis

  309. What about wiring the baseboards? by splattertrousers · · Score: 1
    What about having baseboards that pop off to reveal whatever wires you want? You could have a hub on each level, and run wires from the hub to any point through the baseboards. You could install a jack anywhere by drilling into the baseboards.

    And where there is a door, you could go around it by having removable moulding (or whatever it's called) or go under it by having that piece of the floor directly under the door (which has a name too I bet) pop off.

    Obviously, I don't know squat about building (or wiring), but it sounds logical to me.

    Anyone know why it isn't (or can't be) done?

  310. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by Yokaze · · Score: 2

    >cat6 hasn't been ratified yet, but will allow gigabit and beyond
    AFAIK, there is no beyond.
    Gigabit-ethernet was the last standard for copper.
    The 802.3 will not work on faster copper standards.
    The next standard 802.3ad (10 Gb/s) is fibre-only.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  311. Bunch of fucking morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This entire thread is a laugh to anyone in the trades ...I got down this far and could bite my tongue no longer ...which goes to show...never let a fucking geek touch a hammer.

    Fact: Run whatever you want, wherever you want, but run it before the sheetrock goes up...and most important...have a fucking plan beforehand.

    To think that you can easily just run conduit anywhere, then pull wire at your leisure is a fucking joke! Get a clue. Hire a professional to come up with a total wiring
    plan, making the best decisions you can based on cost vs. practicality ...then stick with it.

    The most expensive part of building is whats referred to as 'change orders', so make knowledgeable decisions beforehand ..and stick with them.

    And IMHO, who in their fucking right mind would install fiber in a fucking residential installation?

  312. Beowolf Cluster by rosssw · · Score: 0

    If you're gonna have a Beowolf Cluster in your home, and want it to run at a decent speed, I'd suggest you go with fibre. We have it at work, and damn it's fast.

  313. Running phone lines over cat-5 by XNormal · · Score: 2

    Why not just use cat-5 for EVERYTHING, including phones, like many companies do in their offices? It's much more flexible.

    You can either use jacks with both types of connectors or standardize on RJ45 and use RJ11/RJ45 cables to connect your phones. In this case it helps to keep certain conventions like 'top jack is phone, bottom jack is ethernet' but it's also good to be able to break this rule.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  314. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    $1800 per drop! Are you insane? Your company will go broke with you making purchasing decisions.

    We just installed 53 drops of 3M Volition Fiber. This stuff is amazing. You can tie the fibre in knots. The connectors (VF-45) can be yanked out (literally) and replugged hundreds of times without failures. This is in stark contrast to some of the problems experienced with the old-school fibre connections. And to top it off, it's only a bit more than Cat5 per drop.

    Check out the 3M Volition web site for technical details.

    Also, check out Gemflex for some inexpensive 100Mbit network cards and 8-port switches. 3M also sells a line of high-performance Gigabit switches, but they are still out of range for a normal home network.

    To give you an idea, Gemflex pricing is around:
    - $ 90 VF-45 NICs
    - $400 8-port switches
    - $100 RJ-45 to VF-45 converter

    It will be more expensive to build a fiber network, and for a home it may not be worth it. For a small/medium-sized office, however, I think it's a great future-proof option.

  315. 3M Volition Fiber is Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many replies have criticized fiber as being "expensive" and "a pain in the ass". While this may be true of many of the traditional fiber types, 3M has a much better solution.

    Check out 3M Volition Fiber. This stuff is amazing (we just installed 53 drops). You can tie the fiber in knots. The connectors (VF-45) can be yanked out (literally) and replugged hundreds of times without failures. This is in stark contrast to some of the problems experienced with the old-school fiber connections. And to top it off, it's only a bit more than Cat5 per drop.

    Also, check out Gemflex for some inexpensive 100Mbit network cards and 8-port switches. 3M also sells a line of high-performance Gigabit switches, but they are still out of range for a normal home network.

    To give you an idea, Gemflex pricing is around:
    - $ 90 VF-45 NICs
    - $400 VF-45 8-port switches
    - $100 RJ-45 to VF-45 converter

    It will be more expensive to build a fiber network (mainly due to NIC and switch cost), and for a home it may not be worth it. For a small/medium-sized office, however, I think it's a great option.

  316. Uplink! by tomas.bjornerback · · Score: 1

    My five cents: Stick to Cat5(e) in the house, but leave separate conduits with nothing but a wire in them (very hard to pull additional cables when other cables are present).

    The Uplink

    Where I live, we have 100 Mbps connections to the entire city, and also to the Internet.

    It was posted on /. a few weeks ago, but feel free to see how a real network is made on 100 Mbps@home (50 000+ visitors already!).

    --

    I have 1 Gbps Internet access@home

  317. Re:Ducts - Air Handling Space by crucini · · Score: 2

    I think the other poster meant wiring duct, such as this Panduit product which is actually a raceway. Your comments, of course, apply to ventilation ducts.

  318. Don't run cable, run conduit by old_n_anal · · Score: 1

    So how much will your life suck if you button up all of that CAT5 in a wall only to find a few years down the road that the rules/protocols/latest gadgets have changed. Think about houses with intercoms and blenders built into the counter tops.

    If instead you run conduit (PVC will do nicely, EMT if you think you really need it) and leave pull strings behind, you can place/replace whatever turns you on in the future. Conduit also has the nice advantage that you can terminate it most anywhere. For that pipe coming out of the outside wall, way back in where the attic gets tight, just glue on an elbow and bring it out to where you can work on it. And while I'm on my soapbox, if you choose to leave blanked junction boxes in the wall (as suggested elsewhere) leave them at both standard heights: 14" OC for outlets, 48" OC for wall switches. The ones higher up let you come back and put in switches, IR repeaters, whatever.

    (for those of you who don't have j-boxes where you need 'em, ask your local electrical supply store for, and how to use, "madison straps" to cut in extra boxes. Nice neat job, no drywall to patch)

    (always check your local building/NFPA codes)

  319. INNERDUCT - Re:Don't do either yet. by fwc · · Score: 2
    I agree with the posters, but disagree with the steel option.


    I'd pull innerduct or plastic flexible conduit or whatever you want to call it. (If I ask at the electrical supply place for innerduct they know what I am talking about.)


    Essentially, this is a flexible tube, probably about 1" in diameter for your application, which is DESIGNED To have data cable ran in it. I've seen this stuff at home depot but I think they call it something else there. Generally it has ridges or "ripples" circularly around the tube. I have pulled many a wire through metal conduit and have also had my fair share of problems. Recently, people have been using the innderduct instead, and the cables are much easier to pull through, etc.


    Installation is also a breeze. It's a lot more like running a slightly-stiff garden hose than say pipe. You might need to staple/strap it in key spots, and check code requirements. Since it's data, generally you can get away with almost anything.


    Get a spool of Innerduct, a big juction box to connect everything into, and put at least one dual-gang box on each wall, if not more. I've also seen one Innerduct ran to the first one and a second one "jumpering" to a second (or third) box on the wall, so you can actually terminate the wires anywhere you want.


    Once you have the innerduct in, it doesn't matter what you put in it.... Fiber, Coax, CAT5, CAT6, etc. etc. etc.

  320. space considerations by Crazy+Viking · · Score: 1

    I think you will quickly run into the problem of lack of space in the wire path. Have you ever tried to run an extra cable in those tubes they put in your wall? You should not be too optimistic about what you will be able to do. Two cat5 + a phone line sounds like a limit to me.

    Have you considered to run cat5 to rooms where that do not have phone connection?
  321. Some advice... by biglig2 · · Score: 2

    Definately run CAT5 now. Optionally, put dark fibre in next to it. You don't have to use it now, and the cable itself is probably cheap - it's the termination and the net cards that will cost.

    But probably it makes more sense to just run trunking and string so you can pull more stuff later. Who knows, in 5 years we may have wireless at fibre speeds, or sub-ethanet, or be able to run terrabit over CAT-7 copper, or whatever.

    Remember, when running the CAT-5, the first rule of cabling:

    "Put more cable in than you need, because the customer cannot be trusted when she says "I will only ever need x wires to that point". Even if the customer is you!"

    I've just had a day of crimp-tool fun making doublers to run two phone lines down a single CAT-5, largely because the customer did something that was guaranteed as "unthinkable" when we wired the damn site. Should have followed the rule ;-)

    REmember as well that CAT_5 is well established, and so you will be able to get all sorts of interesting baluns to run all sorts of nifty stuff down it.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  322. No Fiber, ...it shall pass in about 8 years, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cat5e will do well for now. Thinking 10 years into the future, I see no Cat5, little fiber, if any and 99+% wireless. I'm in the process of replacing the "rats nest" with wireless as we speak.

  323. Leave yourself open for updating by nanoakron · · Score: 1

    2 years ago, before I knew the difference myself, we had an inexperienced electrician run 'ethernet' cables into our new house as it was being constructed, only to find out later that he'd used BNC cabling.

    To make matters worse, when I tried to pull out the old cable to replace it with better stuff, I realised that he'd used the old electrician's trick of wrapping the cable around nails in the drywall so that it wouldn't pull through any further.

    So the moral is: no matter what you decide on now, make sure your electrician runs the cables straight through so that you can leave yourself open for upgrading at a later date.

    -Nano.

  324. Why not cat 6 when you are at it?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not cheap but fast :-)

  325. Why not cat 6 when you are at it?? by Orre · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It will get u there.

  326. Conduit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just finished building a new home and I got the electrician to install conduit from the electrical box to the unfinished basement. It's relatively cheap to do, and it saves you from having to fish wire through wall studs. It's also easier to replace cable when you have to change it later (fiber anyone :) )

  327. No fiber by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I strongly suggest you do not install fiber. For many reasons. First, fiber is expensive. Second, terminating fiber is expensive. Third, the toold are expensive. Fourth, the NICs and hubs/switches are expensive. Fifth, you can't just "run" fiber. It takes special conduit, or armored fiber. Feel free to contact me with more information.

    --
    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
    1. Re:No fiber by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      If, for example, you wanted to run Fibre in an older house just to connect two computers that were fairly far apart, would that be worthwhile? Terminating is still an issue, but fibre NICs aren't that incredibly expensive anymore. What kind of ducting would be needed, etc?

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  328. No, you can still do it later by pkesel · · Score: 2, Informative

    As most connected home owners know, you can get cables about anywhere you need them, one way or another. And if you can't, most good electricians can. I've helped my dad, a licensed electrician, do some crazy stuff to get wires where they need to go.

    If you're building a house, put in a wiring closet. Wire all your phone, cableTV, network, and home-theater connections into that location. You can get some fine management stations at most home centers. Make it in a central position in the lower level, and make sure there's a way to get wiring to second floors if necessary. One good way to do that is to put a 3" conduit next to a heat duct or air return or something similar. If you can, put a junction box somewhere on the second floor as well. Whatever the case, extend the conduit through to a junction box in the ceiling. Put several pull strings in alongside the existing cables.

    Also, make sure you have a cable raceway on the ceiling in the basement (if you have one) so that if you finish the lower level you have a way to get cables through the ceiling.

    Most home setups don't use the 10Mb/s to capacity, much less 100Mb/s. Can't see a good reason to even think about fiber yet.

    --
    - Sig this!
  329. Condiuts by pbrinich · · Score: 1

    Hey,
    I would just go with cat5e for right now (I did when I built my house in june), but run it through a conduit, so you can upgrade it later, it's really easy to do and DEFINATELY worth the flexibility.

  330. here are some tips for structured cabling... by john_uy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i am doing some structured cabling for a campus environment and i would like to share to you some tips that i have learned.

    1. use the highest grade of cable available. use cat6 (even though the standard has not yet been established.) we did a testing and the best cable came from nordx/cdt using their cat6 4800lx cables.

    2. do not put any telephone wire (cat3) cables. cat 5 is backward compatible to cat 4,3,2,1 and of course cat 6 will be for 5,4,3,2,1. but the cat3 cable is not forward compatible to cat6. you can crimp the rj45 on a pair of cat3.

    3. treat the outlet to each room as more of utility. therefore, you should place it as much as you can across the room just like electrical outlets. besides, this is what structured cabling is all about.

    4. i do not suggest that you use stp, this is because you will need to ground each end of the cable or else it will absorb all the interference. stp is used for industrial applications where there are motors, and other interference causing devices. what you do is get a good grade of shielding in the conduit instead.

    5. assign a small room or cabinet in your house that you can centrally terminate the cables with connections to your switches, telco company, cable company, etc.

    6. with regard to safety, use a fire proof coating in the cables but not necessarily plenum. plenum emits toxic substances when burned although it will take extra effort to burn it.

    7. use patch cables. buy the factory made patch cables to terminate to a device at both ends instead of crimping it. it provides the lowest in terms of signal loss.

    8. remember get a certification (these are offered by good manufacturers.) at least you can avail of warranty of parts and labor if anything goes wrong.

    below is just my thoughts in helping you decide in using fiber or copper.

    with regards to fiber, imho, in 10 years time, copper will be obsolete. fiber to the desktop will be as common as cat 5 installations. copper is reaching its limits. the proposed cat7 cable requires shielding in each copper pair and a shielding for the entire cable. the head will no longer be rj45. it will definitely be more expensive than buying fiber optic cables.

    when using fiber optic, since your installation is in a house, you can use the multimode fiber optic cable. you can get the 62.5/125 or 50/125 core. distance is more of the decision what type to get. it depends on the equipment you get (see the specs.) remember that fiber optic should come in pairs. for connection heads, the most common is sc. almost all gigabit uses that with exception to some who use mt-rj.

    imho, i think that nowadays, it is actually cheaper to create fiber optic cables than copper cables because fiber optic is made up of glass and is then made up of sand whereas copper is made from copper and you can actually melt the wires and sell the copper from it than fiber optic. manufacturers are just selling fiber optic for a higher price since it is in high demand in commercial applications (more $$$$.)

    i should say that you may not need all of those information since you are not doing any commercial installation but i believe that when you do something, you must do it good! (besides it should last for 25 years or more.)

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  331. Do you have a wiring closet? by Catiline · · Score: 1

    Or just a closet you can turn into a wiring closet?

    My suggestion is this: there is no way to know what is going to be standard cabling 10-15 years from now... so plan to be able to change out all of your wiring.

    Instead of running cables, buy smallish (1" or thereabouts) PVC pipes, and instead of running a wire, run pipes (and a string!) to the wiring closet. Although you can't do this with electrical wiring for code reasons, it should work for phone/ ethernet/ cable/ etc. Voila! instant modular wiring. (YMMV.)
    ------

  332. Cat 5e = Gigabit. Why more? by SkywalkerOS8 · · Score: 1

    With Cat 5e you can hook up Gigabit over Twisted Pair. IMHO, in 10 years, most homes still won't be wired with FastEthernet(100Mbps), let alone Gigabit, so you'll definitely be set. Plus fiber is still way to expensive(cable and hardware-wise) to be worth it. It would be a better idea to spend the money on access tubes to easily replace the Cat 5e when it becomes necessary. Good houses last a lot longer than 10 years.

  333. be careful by Morgoth_Bauglir · · Score: 1

    If you do use the same path that the phone lines use, be careful not to burn holes in the insulation with the friction of pulling the CAT5 over the phone lines.

    Pulling one wire over another will make the stationary insulation very hot very fast. Pull slowly. Take breaks to allow the wire to cool down.

  334. Run conduit instead of wires! by shofmann · · Score: 1

    If you really want to future-proof (yes, that's an icky marketing term, but accurate!) your house's construction, in addition to running cat-5 (which can be used for POTS as well - RJ-11 plugs are mechanically and electrically compatible with RJ-45 sockets) run conduit through the walls. That allows you to easily run whatever cables you might require years down the road, much easier and cheaper than trying to fish wire through stud bays. Also, install a junction station in the basement, so you can easily connect and/or switch wall panels with signal sources.

    If you're stringing wires now, run coax (cable tv) and speaker wires through the walls now, in addition to cat-5 and electrical service. A company whose name escapes me (but they have been featured on PBS's "This Old House" a couple of times) sells a cable bundle called "future-proof wiring" that includes a pair each of cat-3, cat-5, coax, fiber, and speaker wire, all bundled neatly together. It costs a lot, but the labor savings will probably make up the difference.

  335. Cat5 by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    Actually Cat5 is the requirement. Cat5e "has improved signal carrying capabilities" over Cat5 but aren't required for GigE. 1000Base-T (802.3ab) standards have a complex signal encoding scheme that is very similar to 100Base-T2. It also uses all 4 pairs. My source (besides my own knowledge) is O'Reilly's Ethernet: The Definitive Guide". An excellent read BTW.

  336. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by TheToon · · Score: 2, Informative

    In a new house I woul go for cat7 wire. It has several advantages. First it's certified for gigabit ethernet, secondly the wires are individually shielded. It has 8 wires in each cable and you can easily run two 100Mbps/FDX in one cable.

    --
    //TheToon
  337. Nope by epepke · · Score: 2

    I've wrapped plenum-rated cable around a soldering iron that was hot enough to fry the copper off a board if I wasn't careful (normally ran it through a diode for PC board work). No effect. PVC-insulated cable, on the other hand, roasts and stinks rather quickly.

    Incidentally, "plenum" is not the name of the cable; it's the name of the air space. Literally, it is an air space at higher pressure than the surrounding air space (e.g. for ventilation). However, it has come to mean just about any air space, especially the air space above the ceiling and in walls.

  338. What's So Funny? I'm Doing This by SEGV · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm literally putting the conduit in this weekend. In the future, I can pull whatever cables I want.

    In my living/dining room, which I'm currently rennovating, I'm adding four outlets with conduit to the basement. Each outlet has space for six connectors. Leviton plug-in style. I can run voice, ethernet, cable, speaker, etc.

    I'm just putting a box plate onto the stud and drywall, no actual device box. The wall plate goes on the finished side. Behide is a vapour barrier box, with 1" conduit going out the bottom through the floor.

    Plan for change.

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
  339. Yes! Conduit! by SEGV · · Score: 1

    I'm putting conduit in my house this weekend while the drywall is removed.

    I'll be pulling wires by Christmas.

    Definitely the way to go.

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
  340. Run Lots, Run Cheap by airship · · Score: 1

    When I built my house, I wired 2 Cat5, 2 audio, and 2 coax cables from each of 11 workstations to a wiring drop in the basement. Though I never used it all, I knew any hookup I ever wanted to do was possible.
    If I had it to do over again, I would have added even more drops (like one under the kitchen cabinets, and one to the front and back doors). It's cheap and easy when you're building. Just do it. But not fiber.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  341. Flexible conduit by nbcjones · · Score: 1
    Better idea: Run flexible plastic conduit (aka "Smurf Tube"). It's pretty cheap, and it's easy enough to run. No matter *what* becomes standard in the future, you'll probably be able to run it in the smurf tube.

    And yes, leave a piece of string in each run.

  342. I'm no cabling expert... by strombrg · · Score: 1

    ...but it seems to me you'd be in good shape for the future if you used some good wide PVC for your existing cables, and ran some good strong string (fishing line maybe), so you can pull whatever you need in the future. Then you don't have to worry about something replacing fiber, or your connectors becoming outdated, or whatever.

    When it comes time to string your fiber or whatever, you pull two things - the fiber, and a replacement string for the next time you need to upgrade. Just tie'em both to the fishing line that's already in there, and pull.

  343. sneak or bribRe:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just bought a house in the same way. We were not allowed to make ANY changes. A friend and i came in at night and pulled two extra cat5 runs to every outlet, back to the OnQ box. The builder couldnt get that past the inspectors, so they had to clip the cat5.

    BUT, it was too much work for them to pull it all out, so i still have the runs to each room, its just that they terminate to the cut ends hidden in the attic. I will have to wire extensions to those cables and run it the rest of the way to my server room, but at least its in the walls, which i could not go back and add.

    on another note, you may be able to bribe the onsite contractor to let you do it. give it a shot, all they can say is no.

  344. Don't forget to label the wires... by muzeke · · Score: 1
    Labelling seems minor initially, but it will help you a lot when you're modifying things. Use an easily-recognizable naming scheme for each ends of the wire and use something like p-touch wire labeller to label them permanently.

    If you're gonna run phone lines through the cat5 your basement, or wherever your lines aggregate, is gonna be one chaos of wires.

    If you're gonna use conduits, label the conduits too. Not gonna use conduits? That'd be a big mistake as it helps in reducing fire hazard and interference. Just pick 'em up at the local home depot. They're cheap and gives you infinite peace of mind.

    About fibers, I'd stay away from them, not only because of the cost and the hassle, but mostly because they're dangerous. If the glass cracks and you get splinters on you, you may very well end up dead, because the tiny splinters will easily enter the skin and into your bloodstream and finally into your heart. It may be the most painful way to die, second only to having a bullet shot up your ass.

  345. bandwidth.... by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

    Thats what UWB is for... (UltraWideBand).
    Have a UWB antenna mounted on the ceiling of each room or something, in some sort of p-p fashion or something...

  346. actually by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

    I would suggesting just using VPN...

    Either use nothing, or use VPN.... Don't bother with WEP, it won't do anything for you, other than give you a fake sense of security...

  347. Vents.. by mkaufman · · Score: 1

    My whole house is actually wired through the vents. We have 6 computers on the top floor and I run all the cables down through one vent which drops out into the basement which then connects to a router. Works very well - and the vent does not have any super-cold/hot air running through it.

  348. Run Fiber Now but Don't Terminate it by codeguy007 · · Score: 0
    The Fiber itself is very cheap. What costs alot is terminating the ends. If I were you I would have the telephone installer run the cat5 and fiber for you as well because it is really not much more work for him to run multiple lines.


    Running fiber now would allow you to just terminate the ends when you are ready to use it. The question is do you really need fiber. The distance you are going to be working with in the host are well within Gb Copper's range. I can see you needing to go much past 1000 Mb within the next 10 years.

  349. Baseboard Conduits by brightloudnoise · · Score: 1

    This won't really apply to you, but I remember seeing baseboard conduits that looked pretty stylish in the case of someone needing to retro-fit an existing house.

    I've done a quick search but haven't been able to find something like that, so if anyone has links to a product like that I, and I'm sure others would appreciate it.

    --
    brightloudnoise.com
  350. Faraday Cage by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    Don't forget that while the drywall's off is a great time to build a faraday cage around your office.

    No, really. Imagine the potential impact on resale value, especially if organized crime ever moves into your area.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  351. Re:OT: Use plenum -not by jamoke · · Score: 0

    Plenum cable can cost twice as much and really only has one purpose relative to building codes.
    Plenum cable is required when run in air plenums.
    Commercial buildings will use the space above ceilings are "return air" plenums for heating venilation and air conditioning. Under these circumstances you should run Plenum grade cable for health/saftey purposes. In the normal home your cat 5 and other cabling runs behind walls so this is not an issue. Consider the romex cable that's used for the electrical wiring in your home, and your central vac system (another good idea to install while the walls are open) ..these items are pvc. Forget the Plenum rated (teflon) coated stuff. It's a waste of money, and has nothing to do with "spreading fires" . It's about the gasses they produce when burning.

  352. Run cat-5 outside of the house by ravenswood1000 · · Score: 1

    When I ran cat-5 through my house I took part of the siding off the outside, bored a hole through the wall, strung the wire, caulked the hole and put the siding back on. The cat-5 is literally running along the outside of the house tucked into the siding. Just another idea.

  353. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i believe the webbie u meant was http://www.3m.com/volition/

  354. Wiring a house by Muggs+McGinnis · · Score: 0

    I've been pondering this for years. I've wired some buildings for ethernet and it seems like the damn physical layer keeps changing... fat coax with vampire taps replaced by thin coax replaced by a variety of twisted pair standards that have settled out into cat5. Fiber is the new, best thing but you know that just down the road will be some new hot multimodal fiber or some genius will figure out how to pump 64 colors of laser light into a fiber and you'll be stuck because it will require a different variety of fiber.

    When I was a system admin at a company with a really cool Facilities & Operations manager, he would bring me blueprints for every structural change and ask me to mark where I wanted conduit. That made both of our lives *much* easier. He said he could drop galvanized steel conduit from the ceiling to a box with a blank faceplate for $10 (some years ago) and he'd rather put in extra conduit than to have to cut holes into a finished wall.

    Smart guy.

    My suggestion is that you see where you can run conduit. It's more work now but your cat5 will be incredibly well shielded. Then, if you decide later that you want to replace it with fiber, no problem.

    Don't forget to leave a strong cord snaked through your conduit... particularly any unused conduit so you can more easily pull stuff later.

  355. remember **300** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remember, ethernet cables can be a maximum of 300 feet