I didn't intend to be overly flippant. I was just pointing out that I haven't seen evolution occuring -- an error of my correpondent that I was correcting.
Speaking of childishness, why are you posting as an AC?:^)
Umm - yes. We have seen species change. We have even seen speciation happen
I'm only 34. I haven't seen it happen. So "we" haven't seen it happen. You must be very old...
And you have not submitted a test of evolution. Please do so.
Umm - yes. All we would need would be to find, say, fossils of the skeleton of a modern human in Cretaceous rocks. Or if you could should the DNA of humans and chimps was not similar
Oh, so the Creationist wins points for finding only well-developed/complicated organisms in any stratum of rock. Thanks!
Umm - yes. If you keep using insecticides that aren't 100% effective, theory predicts that you will soon end up with insect populations that are resistant to insecticides. And, hey! It happened!
How is this evolution? It is "natural selection," but is insufficient to cause speciation as no new DNA has been created.
A new editor would be nice! Though I might still find myself putting the cursor back at the bottom of the window after a text selection... (It's what you have to do to keep MacPerl from getting confused.)
Thank you very much for the work and the updates!!
Check out my URL. Perl and your tax $s at work.:^)
Slashdot Mirror
Speaking of childishness, why are you posting as an AC? :^)
I'm only 34. I haven't seen it happen. So "we" haven't seen it happen.
You must be very old...
And you have not submitted a test of evolution. Please do so.
Umm - yes. All we would need would be to find, say, fossils of the skeleton of a modern human in Cretaceous rocks. Or if you could should the DNA of humans and chimps was not similar
Oh, so the Creationist wins points for finding only well-developed/complicated organisms in any stratum of rock. Thanks!
Umm - yes. If you keep using insecticides that aren't 100% effective, theory predicts that you will soon end up with insect populations that are resistant to insecticides. And, hey! It happened!
How is this evolution? It is "natural selection," but is insufficient to cause speciation as no new DNA has been created.
Is it testable? Umm - no.
Is it falsifiable? Umm - no.
Is it predictive? Umm - I'd like to know what my children will look like and what mutations they'll have. Can anyone tell me? no.
I wasn't there. I didn't see it. I don't know anyone that was. The evidence that is available is equivocal.
OpenBSD was not discussed in the article.
FreeBSD was.
Otherwise, work up that documentation. :^)
A new editor would be nice! Though I might still find myself putting the cursor back at the bottom of the window after a text selection... (It's what you have to do to keep MacPerl from getting confused.)
:^)
Thank you very much for the work and the updates!!
Check out my URL. Perl and your tax $s at work.
They aren't sending noise.
The "noise" in the data is _caused_ by the components. It is what makes the whole idea work.
And, you don't have to know everything about the hardware.
One laptop had 100-BT. The other had 10-BT. The lowest common denominator is 10-BT, which would be the one that applies.
It, being the slower protocol/technology, may have a the longer, 250 foot, limit.
Imagine the amount of energy the 100 lb. chunck of flaming hot iron from this satellite is packing.
;^)
Would it have significantly less energy if it were cold? I don't think so...