However, that presumes that the members of the colonizing species would be willing to live their whole lives just to accomplish someone's Grand Plan.
No it doesn't. It merely assumes that a majority of them would eventually become wealthy enough to afford to create a colony or two and would do so just as their parent did. You can give each colony a thousand years to mature and still fill the galaxy pretty damn quickly.
Unless destiny says that specific important events can and will happen without fail. Those who shape the future will always exist, and those who don't... well... don't really matter.
The notion of an important event is anthropocentric and meaningless.
I realize science is a process, but spending valuable time "researching" time travel, before we can even explain what time or even gravity is, seems like skipping over the hard work to spend time on "fun stuff".
Well, then. If you catch any of the physicists that work for you wasting time on "fun stuff", you just go right ahead and fire them.
> This would be a person with the password to your Wi-Fi network.
Individual sessions are supposedly secure from each other. I don't see how that's possible without some sort of out-of-band key exchange (i.e., a different password for each user).
Could you also link a study showing that RF like that from a cell phone at cell phone type levels causes harm? peer reviewed and collaborated would be preferred.
No. He couldn't. There is none. There is, however, peer reviewed, collaborated, research disproving the hypothesis that radiation from cellphones causes cancer.
Supposed by who? Certainly not by the people who invented it in the 1950s. It was merely supposed to bring you lots of stations, including ones you couldn't get decent signals from even with a tower and large antenna.
There is another way to raise alcohol levels though. It's done to make ice wine (and a few beers, including the one in question, although not usually to the degree for the squirrel monstrosity). It's called freeze distillation generally, but it's not at all like distillation in the conventional sense.
It's still distillation and the result, though perhaps tasty, is not beer.
As someone unfamiliar with this topic, why? I'm wondering what your definition of beer is, and if it has an arbitrary limit for alcohol content. Does the process for making beer necessarily limit the alcohol to around 10% max?
Slashdot Mirror
No it doesn't. It merely assumes that a majority of them would eventually become wealthy enough to afford to create a colony or two and would do so just as their parent did. You can give each colony a thousand years to mature and still fill the galaxy pretty damn quickly.
...as to whether this thing claims to be protected by patent (not patentable) or copyright (only the exact image would be protected, if that).
Actually, it appears that they are claiming that it is a registered trademark. In that case you are completely free to use it as punctuation.
> Special relativity is known to be wrong.
[Citation needed]
The notion of an important event is anthropocentric and meaningless.
This is very, very clear.
Well, then. If you catch any of the physicists that work for you wasting time on "fun stuff", you just go right ahead and fire them.
It's "Wired Equivalent Privacy" only if your idea of "wired privacy" involves dangling a cable out the window down into the alley behind the building.
> Isn't the idea to always expect the worst? I'd tend to assume that if I give
> anyone any access at all, that they will find a way to break it.
The worst would be to assume that they will find a way to break it no matter what you do even with no access at all and so it is all hopeless.
Ok. I was thinking of "personal" mode (I don't use wireless at all, myself).
> Understand the protocol before commenting, or at least RTFA.
What, and break with Slashdot tradition? Don't be silly.
> This would be a person with the password to your Wi-Fi network.
Individual sessions are supposedly secure from each other. I don't see how that's possible without some sort of out-of-band key exchange (i.e., a different password for each user).
...even in principle to create a secure over-the-air encryption system with no out-of-band key exchange. Does there exist a proof of this?
> ...if this user has your password...
Where does it say that?
> Aren't such services available in .ca or .us ?
They are in some places. THe US and Canada are about as large and diverse as the EU. What kind of service is available in rural Romania?
> There sure seem to be a lot of unhealthy markets around!
Yes, government regulation sees to that.
No. The Congress is.
They have lifetime guaranteed jobs (barring impeachment and conviction) because the Constitution says so.
No. He couldn't. There is none. There is, however, peer reviewed, collaborated, research disproving the hypothesis that radiation from cellphones causes cancer.
> ...will mislead consumers into thinking one phone is safer than another.
No, it will mislead consumers into thinking one phone is more dangerous than another when there is, in fact, no danger at all from any of them.
> I wonder what the BATF thinks about freeze-distillation?
That it is legal.
> Pretty similar reasons why I don't eat other creatures.
In other words, they've got their religion, you've got yours.
> Cable was supposed to be ad-free.
Supposed by who? Certainly not by the people who invented it in the 1950s. It was merely supposed to bring you lots of stations, including ones you couldn't get decent signals from even with a tower and large antenna.
> I have stopped watching TV, even though I pay for the service, instead
> deciding to watch videos via hulu or companies website.
In other words, you still watch tv.
> While I'm sure the beer is very flavourful...
I'm not.
> ...the presentation is tasteless.
So is calling anything with that much alcohol beer (but then tastelessness seems to be the point of the whole excercise).
It's still distillation and the result, though perhaps tasty, is not beer.
Only by the marketing types trying to sell it.
Yes.