> If we can get a superconducting material to emit a pulse of gravitational radiation, > would that then be able to be further refined to become an artificial gravity generator?
We're talking tort here, not crime. As long as he can show that he was acting as the company's agent he's off the hook personally. That's what the CYA letter is for.
The elephant in the room is, of course, the fact that if they fire you you might just go to the BSA...
> This separation causes a polairisation in the material which then relaxes back at some > point afterwards and emmits a gravity wave.
Seems as though that polarisation should be detectable in principle. It also seems as though one should be able to get a superconducting sheet to emit a pulse of gravitational radiation by applying an electrical pulse.
The RIAA produces evidence of the downloading of one copy and then asks for $150,000 in statutory damages. If they want the judge to take their actual damages due to the downloading of 100,000 copies into consideration they must produce evidence of the downloading of 100,000 copies. They don't.
I'm certainly not surprised to see a Democratic administration support the entertainment industry, but in this case they probably have other motivation as well. An unfavorable ruling here could be generalized to the awarding of amounts unrelated to actual damages for any reason. Since it is often the government that collects such awards...
>...having a multi-billion dollar spacecraft dependent on a foreign launch vehicle makes > me nervous.
That's silly. Ariane V is just as reliable as anything the USA has that could launch the JWST. This is not some Russian war-surplus ICBM or Chinese knock-off of an old US design. It is a mature modern rocket with an excellent launch history.
Slashdot Mirror
> If we can get a superconducting material to emit a pulse of gravitational radiation,
> would that then be able to be further refined to become an artificial gravity generator?
No.
No one has ever seen a polynomial...
> If they don't want to go legit, you should consider a new company or push FOSS
> alternatives.
Switching to Free Software *is* going legit.
I agree, but it is going to take time to switch and he needs to try to get the company legal (or at least CHA) in the meantime.
We're talking tort here, not crime. As long as he can show that he was acting as the company's agent he's off the hook personally. That's what the CYA letter is for.
The elephant in the room is, of course, the fact that if they fire you you might just go to the BSA...
> If you can concentrate it, you can amplify it.
That doesn't follow.
> This separation causes a polairisation in the material which then relaxes back at some
> point afterwards and emmits a gravity wave.
Seems as though that polarisation should be detectable in principle. It also seems as though one should be able to get a superconducting sheet to emit a pulse of gravitational radiation by applying an electrical pulse.
This is about gravitational waves, not about gravitational fields.
> ...the default configuration doesn't allow remote access from the Internet at all.
True. The crackers have to use the bot that controls his pc and the default password that he didn't change.
> If you allow ssh access from the wide internet...
Why would you do that?
> ...and you have a weak password for root...
Why would you do that?
The panel switch method is lower level. How do you know your card reader has not been compromised?
Thank you, Jeremy. You may return to your seat. Now, Jennifer, can you see any way to improve on Jeremy's proof?
The RIAA produces evidence of the downloading of one copy and then asks for $150,000 in statutory damages. If they want the judge to take their actual damages due to the downloading of 100,000 copies into consideration they must produce evidence of the downloading of 100,000 copies. They don't.
I'm certainly not surprised to see a Democratic administration support the entertainment industry, but in this case they probably have other motivation as well. An unfavorable ruling here could be generalized to the awarding of amounts unrelated to actual damages for any reason. Since it is often the government that collects such awards...
And the script kiddies will once again have entertainment.
Why? He said nothing about illegal drugs. child pornography, or "terrorism".
Taking over people's property without their permission and using it for your own ends? sounds like government in action to me.
> ...no matter how much you hate Microsoft, has more SQL...
Since when does Structured Query Language have anything in particular to do with Microsoft?
Well, it's not nursing (which will soon be overpopulated) but studying medical records might be a good move.
It's sad to see programs that purport to be about computer science cover only a few popular procedural languaages.
> ...having a multi-billion dollar spacecraft dependent on a foreign launch vehicle makes
> me nervous.
That's silly. Ariane V is just as reliable as anything the USA has that could launch the JWST. This is not some Russian war-surplus ICBM or Chinese knock-off of an old US design. It is a mature modern rocket with an excellent launch history.
> Not by everyone's definition...
By every physicist's definition.
Can we see your proof, please?
This discovery does not imply any problems with the Standard Model at all.
> That is, if I am correct in interpreting your statements as presuming that quantum
> mechanics is apart from "traditional" physics.
Quantum mechanics is traditional physics.