Slashdot Mirror


User: John+Hasler

John+Hasler's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8,663
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8,663

  1. "OpenSolaris, the distribution, is dead." on The Future of OpenSolaris Revealed · · Score: 1

    And thus the CDDL serves its purpose.

  2. Slashdot needs a "business" section... on HP Board Sued Over Hurd Departure · · Score: 1

    ...for articles like this.

  3. Let's see some examples of... on The Risks of Entering Programming Contests · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "...prizes leave participants vulnerable to prosecution." I don't see any in the article.

  4. So now we know. on The Fuel Cost of Obesity · · Score: 1

    The energy crisis is all the fault of McDonalds.

  5. Re:Want to be found? on Facebook Bug Could Give Spammers Names, Photos · · Score: 1

    > Don't use real names on FB.

    I think it may be a good idea the create an FB account in your real name, but it should be a dummy account, existing just to block "pranksters" from using it.

  6. Re:stop making things up on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 1

    But it appears as if the Android designers may not have been careful enough to avoid all of Sun's patents.

    Or maybe they were careful to avoid any Sun patents that their lawyers consider enforceable and were expecting this and are ready for it.

  7. Re:Congratulation ORACLE on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 1

    > ...this is the Sun versus Microsoft lawsuit all over again.

    No it isn't. That was over the use of the JAVA trademark.

  8. Re:Like most things in the legal system..... on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 3, Informative

    Patent law creates the tort of patent infringement, granting patent owners the right to sue those who practice their inventions without permission the right to sue for the tort of patent infringement. No violation of law is involved. If there were it would be the government taking the infringer to court, not the patent owner.

  9. Re:Like most things in the legal system..... on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 1

    > If no laws have been claimed to be violated, there cannot be a lawsuit.

    Yes there can. Lawsuit are filed over breaches of contract and torts. In this case it is the latter, patent infringement being a tort.

  10. Re:All of a sudden iPhone looks like an open syste on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 1

    So you are saying that instead of developing Android Google should have bought Apple?

  11. Re:Looks like a good reason... on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 2, Informative

    To avoid being sued by Oracle or having the platform on which your software has been debugged sued by Oracle.

  12. Re:Not a grant; a licence on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 0

    The word has multiple meanings. A patent owner can grant a license.

  13. Re:Oracle will win on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 1

    If Google wanted to do Java on the android, they should have licensed the VM like everyone else...

    They did. Sun licensed it to everyone. Read the grant in the specification. > ...not stolen it. It is impossible to steal an idea.

  14. Re:Like most things in the legal system..... on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    > ...I'm sure everyone violates some law every day...

    True, but this is about patent infringement. Oracle has not alleged that any laws were violated.

  15. Looks like a good reason... on Oracle Sues Google For Infringing Java Patents · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...not to use Java.

  16. Re:Perhaps a "key escrow" feature? on Can Twitter and Facebook Deal With Their Dead? · · Score: 1

    How about simply requesting a death certificate and then verifying by consulting the public records of the issuing jurisdiction? All the other folderol proposed here is superfluous.

  17. Re:Perhaps a "key escrow" feature? on Can Twitter and Facebook Deal With Their Dead? · · Score: 1

    There are these things called "death certificates"...

  18. "a public obituary that provides proof of death." on Can Twitter and Facebook Deal With Their Dead? · · Score: 1

    An obituary does not provide proof of death. A death certificate provides proof of death. If they have to have some sort of a link it should be to the relevant entry in the records of the jurisdiction where the death occurred (Yes, your death is a matter of public record. More of your precious privacy gone.)

  19. Re:Lasers won't be super deadly until ... on Lasers Approach Their Ultimate Intensity Limit · · Score: 1

    Funny thing about physics, the people who REALLY know what they are talking about also know...

    ...that this does not place a limit on the power output of a laser but on the peak intensity at the focal point.

  20. Re:Most Efficient Laser? on Lasers Approach Their Ultimate Intensity Limit · · Score: 1

    > The creation of matter out of energy cascades and destroys the laser.

    No it doesn't. It limits the intensity which can be achieved by focusing laser energy. The cascade occurs outside the laser.

  21. Re:matter from light? on Lasers Approach Their Ultimate Intensity Limit · · Score: 1

    The preprint says "Submitted on 29 Apr 2010".

  22. Re:Maybe, maybe not on Lasers Approach Their Ultimate Intensity Limit · · Score: 1

    > More to the point, there are fewer neutons/protons/electrons around.

    Not true.

    > IIRC, it's the neutrons that are getting converted into energy, right?

    Wrong. It is the binding energy that is being released.

  23. How about hedging? on Website Lets You Bet On Your Grades · · Score: 1

    Can you sell yourself short?

    Actually, the whole thing smells of insider trading.

  24. Re:Energy vs Intensity and the Death Star on Lasers Approach Their Ultimate Intensity Limit · · Score: 1

    Yes.

  25. Re:Maybe, maybe not on Lasers Approach Their Ultimate Intensity Limit · · Score: 1

    > We don't really know how the Death Star works.

    Of course we do. Cheesy Hollywood special effects are well understood.