Slashdot Mirror


Website Lets You Bet On Your Grades

crimeandpunishment writes "College students who expect to get good grades can get a good payoff, if they're willing to put their money where their mouse is. A website is taking wagers on grades from students at 36 American colleges. Students have to register, upload their schedule, and give the site access to official school records. The site, called Ultrinsic, then calculates odds and the students decide whether to place their bets. Ultrinsic's CEO Steven Woldf insists it's not online gambling, since these wagers involve skill. He says 'The students have 100 percent control over it, over how they do. Other people's stuff you bet on — your own stuff you invest in.'"

204 comments

  1. Skill? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Funny

    When the course list says, "Staff" instead of a professor, luck factors in heavily here.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:Skill? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only to those who don't know how to play the grades game. You go to school to learn, so make sure you main focus is on that, but don't forget to play the grades game, too.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Skill? by morari · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You go to school to buy a piece of paper to impress employers. Learning plays no factor in so-called modern education.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    3. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who makes hiring decisions and interviews prospects, I'm going to call bullshit. There is still real value in education. I won't hire people who think they're hot shit but haven't gone to college to get the ignorance schooled out of them.

      Before I went to college for computer science, I knew everything. Then I learned otherwise. Now I owe my success to the skills I gained in college. You can't prove that with a piece of paper like a diploma, but there's some pretty damn good correlation, and I'll keep playing the odds with my hiring decisions, but thanks.

      Are large numbers of stupid people graduating who don't deserve their degrees? Yes. Has higher education, to some degree, become commoditized and devalued?

      Yes, but it does not follow that no learning occurs at universities.

    4. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not wrong about that. He was my lab partner is Rimjob Lab. To be honest it felt more like an A+.

    5. Re:Skill? by euphemistic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Speak for yourself. Some of us actually took a lot of pleasure in getting a higher education and used it as a step to further self-development rather than just to land a higher-paying job. That part was just gravy. Having been in "the real world" of cubicles for a while now, I'm looking more and more forward to enrolling into a post-grad degree.

      But this is from the perspective of somebody who went into University pursuing interests in the first place. And I'm glad I did. Maybe you'd have been happier if you did the same thing.

    6. Re:Skill? by twidarkling · · Score: 2, Informative

      I... I'm gonna call bullshit. Depending on your institution, teacher, and personal disposition, you may or may not learn the curriculum. But that's still different than learning nothing. If nothing else, you need to learn how to give the professor what he or she wants to see. That involves reading people. Some profs like sycophants, some like contrarians, some like big words being used, some value class participation. You need to learn how to give people what they want, how they want it, and in how obvious a manner they want it.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    7. Re:Skill? by russotto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You go to school to buy a piece of paper to impress employers. Learning plays no factor in so-called modern education.

      As someone who makes hiring decisions and interviews prospects, I'm going to call bullshit. There is still real value in education. I won't hire people who think they're hot shit but haven't gone to college to get the ignorance schooled out of them.

      As someone who makes hiring decisions, you've proven the OPs point.

    8. Re:Skill? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You go to school to buy a piece of paper to impress employers. Learning plays no factor in so-called modern education.

      I assume you majored in popsicle stick collection, then. In the sciences, a college education is absolutely necessary and conveys an enormous body of information. Looking at recent hires in my organization, GPA and the number of relevant courses completed correlates quite well with job performance. I'm confident that's due to a causative mechanism. Why hire people who'd need a year of background training before they can understand the job-specific training, especially when you don't know whether they'll be able to learn the subject at all? A good college record shows that the student can learn new things and usually carries with it a vast body of useful knowledge that doesn't need to be retaught.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    9. Re:Skill? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You go to school to buy a piece of paper to impress employers. Learning plays no factor in so-called modern education.

      I'm sorry your college career sucked so much. What a waste of time.

      People who want to learn in college have no problem doing so. If you don't get anything from it, it's because you suck as much as anything else. Seriously, if you're going to sit through hours of a biology class or a math class, why not take the time to learn something? If you sit there ignoring the professor and surfing facebook that's your own stupid fault.

      --
      Qxe4
    10. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

      So which is it, did I prove that no employer evaluates the merits of their candidates and only cares if they have a degree, or that learning does not happen at institutions of higher education in 2 paragraphs?

      Yeah...I don't think you know what you're talking about.

    11. Re:Skill? by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Informative

      I went into college knowing a lot, and also knowing that there was more out there I didn't know. During college, I increased the first quantity.

      The most important skills I learned, in order:

      1. Proper (or even merely acceptable) use of formal language can impress people.
      2. Impressing people is an easy way to cut through bureaucracy and get a face-to-face talk with the people making decisions.
      3. Those people are hidden at all levels of the bureaucracy.

      I suppose I also learned how to win a programming contest. That accomplishment, more or less by itself, got me my last job interview.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    12. Re:Skill? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because you dropped out of college doesn't mean that it's worthless.

      I'm not saying it's absolutely crucial for everyone to attend college, but it's mandatory for certain professions. For example, a mechanical engineer will have to know calculus, physics, and a lot of design principals. Are you seriously suggesting that this can be taught on the job? If so, you clearly don't know what you're talking about. There is a lot of stuff that you need to know before you can actually do certain jobs, just because you don't have one of these jobs doesn't mean no one else does either.

      I find that most people that rail against college are one of two types of people:
      1. People that dropped out of college because they weren't smart enough or because they couldn't manage their time properly.
      2. People with a job that doesn't require any college education.

      The first type of person is just bitter that they couldn't handle it, the second type of person is too short sighted to see that there are jobs that require more book learning than theirs. They assume that because they learned how to wire a house on the job that an engineer can learn how to build a bridge on the job.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    13. Re:Skill? by SirSlud · · Score: 1, Insightful

      +5 insightful for a complete lack of reading comprehension skills? Neato.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    14. Re:Skill? by chaboud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think what he's saying (or at least what I'm saying now) is that you don't necessarily have to have met a very high standard to receive a degree from a number of programs. Similarly, those without degrees can, in fact, be hot shit.

      The absolute best and brightest programmers I've worked with have been decorated as follows:

      - GED, dropped out of college.
      - Almost finished college.
      - BS Math.
      - BA Music.
      - PhD Econ, PhD Physics.

      That's from brightest down. That's right, the most rock-star coder (and Director/VP/CTO) that I've worked with was a double drop-out. The standard deviation, in my experience, is pretty large. You'll note that there are no CS, EE, or ECE folks on that list (but a few on my top 10). The programmers that I've seen truly excel after CS programs were the sort that I think would have been pretty darn good with or without the formal education.

    15. Re:Skill? by jmerlin · · Score: 1

      I went to college. I don't think it was ignorance you know. Considering I learned almost nothing from the courses, and books I had already read in middle school covering every topic taught in college and then many more. All of the MSDN Mag articles I had read. All of the code I had read of open source projects and independent papers published by prominent mathematicians and computer scientists on new ideas. All of the software I had reverse engineered. Perhaps it was because I had been coding for longer than some of my professors. Perhaps it was because I viewed CS as a hobby I've always loved and have always wanted to know more. I thought I was "hot shit" when I went into college. It didn't change any getting a degree, as most of the professors didn't know as much practically about the subjects as I did, having read the actual source of projects that implemented the vaporous concepts they were alluding to. Having read the actual papers by the originators of many of the ideas they held so grand. I'm not really sure. But in reality, I'm still a nobody. It wasn't ignorance. It was arrogance, ignorance's big nasty brother. I'm still arrogant but it doesn't matter so much. Would you prefer an arrogant prick that could get his work done with phenomenal pace and innovate on the spot or an ignorant kid who got a CS degree because he thought it'd get him a good job and.. he liked computers anyway so he figured it'd be cool? I just don't feel like your assumption that "going to college" somehow ends with someone having ignorance schooled of them has any merit. From my experience there are two kinds of computer science students: those who already knew just about everything they were going to learn, and those who just jumped into it. Not to say the latter CAN'T be great computer scientists, it's just a lot more uncommon.

    16. Re:Skill? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Or when the professor takes a leave of abscence, the course is a "deversity" requirement, and the new surprise instructor is an admitted feminist who talks openly about her personal problems and hates young men. Yes, this happened to me, and I recieved a 17 (as in 17%) on the first exam of the semester, which was short-answer and essay based. I expected a B or a C, as it was not my best subject, but I was a good student. Due to numerous complaints, the part-time instructor was not asked to return. My money would have been lost if I had wagered on my grade, since I withdrew from the class before being cornered into an unfairly poor grade. Clearly there are more factors involved than just studying hard, so this is definitely gambling, unless the grading is 100% objective, which is rarely the case, especially with more advanced coursework.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    17. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the kind of person I'd pass by in hiring and here is why. You aren't the hacker- you aren't the guy who is going to get shit done. You're the guy who went to school and actually learned something. But probably got fed shit. You thought you knew something and found out that you didn't. Now you thought you learned something. Well, maybe you did for you. But that's why I know there are better candidates than you. What you should have discovered is that the morons that teach are just that and lost all respect for the educational system. Then gone on to find out what the people applying for jobs ACTUALLY know and disregard the degrees altogether or put very little value in them if any. Whether someone thinks they are "hot shit" or not is irrelevant and in my experience the people who actually know shit aren't the degree holders. The real hackers tend to not have acquired degrees surprisingly. And yea- this is coming from a degree holder. I went through what was suppose to be a very good computer science program, and I admit they graduated very few people of I who entered the program, but I went in with allot of knowledge and came out feeling like wtf with many if not most of professor as. Did they really issue him a doctorate? I had professors who thesis were in computer security for instance and couldn't pass security 101. At least that was my feeling on it. I want to hire the hacker, I want to hire the person who enjoys learning, who is going figure out the systems, do it and get me the most out of the systems in place. Be it I'm hiring them to paint my bathroom, write a program, or fix my computer. The hacker will enjoy figuring out the system. Everybody else will just rely on the system in place to do the learning/work. The hacker will find, develop, or tweak the system to be the most efficient system possible and enjoy it.

    18. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've proven that you're impressed by a piece of paper. It is interesting that your statement assumes someone is not ignorant simply because they've been to college, and consider anyone who hasn't been somehow intrinsically less qualified. Formal schooling is hardly the only avenue of learning. Perhaps if your interviewing process was better you could tell who was qualified and who wasn't without preconceptions based on their claims to education.

    19. Re:Skill? by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      You proved that you think someone is a moron if they don't go to college. Now, while most people who don't go to college may be morons, it's not an "if-then" situation - you can be brilliant and never go to college because you're out doing great things - yet you said you wouldn't give them the time of day because they didn't have a piece of paper. THAT is what you proved.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    20. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying it's absolutely crucial for everyone to attend college, but it's mandatory for certain professions. For example, a mechanical engineer will have to know calculus, physics, and a lot of design principals. Are you seriously suggesting that this can be taught on the job? If so, you clearly don't know what you're talking about. There is a lot of stuff that you need to know before you can actually do certain jobs, just because you don't have one of these jobs doesn't mean no one else does either.

      Your claims do not match up against history. It is comparatively recently that a college education has been mandated in the way you describe. Personally, I always kinda figured that attending courses taught by others was certainly one way to learn, but by no means is it the only way to learn. Yes, I have an engineering education. Not Mech

    21. Re:Skill? by Radres · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would mod you up if I could. Far too many people go to school with the idea that anything that they could learn that isn't directly applicable to what they perceive as being their dream job isn't worth learning. In actuality, learning new and different things exposes you to the possibility of pursuing a career doing something truly exciting.

    22. Re:Skill? by NetNed · · Score: 1

      If you make hiring decisions, god help whatever company you are working for.

      Working in the industry, I think, has been more beneficial then any class I ever took because any computer professional will tell you that there is the way you learn in school and the way that it is actually done. If courses taught the best possible way that would be one thing, but they don't for 90% of what they teach about computing. There is the way you learned and the way that is more effective, takes less time to set up, and has less overhead. Choose the first and watch how long your job lasts.

    23. Re:Skill? by fishexe · · Score: 1

      When the course list says, "Staff" instead of a professor, luck factors in heavily here.

      I would say the opposite. If you get a professor, they have tenure and don't give a shit if students appeal grades. If you get academic staff, they have to grade you as accurately and objectively as they possibly can, because if they mess up their job is potentially on the line.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    24. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about those of us who went to a trade school or learned our skills in the military?

      As a network admin who learned my skills during my time with Uncle Sam, I would wager that when your server starts to melt, the phones are ringing off the hook, three printers are down, and the CEO is on his way to the building; you would rather have someone who knows how to work well under stress than someone who knows how to properly roll a joint or tap a keg...

    25. Re:Skill? by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      As someone who makes hiring decisions and interviews prospects, I'm going to call bullshit.

      (Deleted stuff)

      Are large numbers of stupid people graduating who don't deserve their degrees? Yes. Has higher education, to some degree, become commoditized and devalued?

      Yes, but it does not follow that no learning occurs at universities.

      By your own admission, it does follow that you have a challenging job because you have to look for people like yourself among devalued degrees and undeserving candidates. Your personal experience at university is the minority case.

      Anyway, you work in HR, so if you're not ineffectual or full of buzz-word rubbish, have a cookie.

      I have both taught in university and worked in a university administration. I've been offered bribes by students to pass them. I've seen the laziness and cheating that is "group work". I've seen senior university students require remedial high-school assistance. I've watched the 10% of students who are talented wondering what sort of a Kafkaesque sham their world is.

      In administration, I have seen the overpaying management positions filled by self-anointing PhDs who weren't any good at teaching either. I've seen these All-Star products of their own system try to apply their theories to the real world and it's a good thing that they are not measured by performance and progress. I've seen what university management does when the economy is imploding and courageous budgetary decisions must be made: save their salaries and stipends, and raise the tuitions and student fees.

      The input of our educational system is mostly garbage and the system itself is rotten. If you find a gem in the cloaca, I am quite sure it's not a product of the educational system's intestines. (o:

      It's time for the Internet to transform Education.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    26. Re:Skill? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You go to school to buy a piece of paper to impress employers. Learning plays no factor in so-called modern education.

      People who say things like this generally got poor grades at college but think they're fucking geniuses.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    27. Re:Skill? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      That's right, the most rock-star coder (and Director/VP/CTO) that I've worked with was a double drop-out.

      And Bill Gates, a college dropout, became the richest man in the world, so therefore any formal education is just going to make you poor, so isn't it great that I failed high school and, although currently working at McDonalds, fully expect to be the CEO of my own billion dollar company very very soon.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    28. Re:Skill? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Groupthink is biased on this issue. A lot of the folks here (myself included) didn't go to University, but still work tech jobs. We're proof that the OP is right; Degrees aren't the be-all, end-all. There are people in the world, large quantities of them, being passed over for jobs they're more than capable of doing, purely because they don't have a few letters after their name. It's not even worth them applying, as people like ergrthjuyt above simply throw the applications in the shredder.

      So, even if the comprehension was a little off for that comment, it's because a lot of people here want to demonstrate the OP to be wrong.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    29. Re:Skill? by RackinFrackin · · Score: 1

      If you really think that he proved that, then you have some serious issues with your reading comprehension.

    30. Re:Skill? by pehrs · · Score: 1

      You go to school to buy a piece of paper to impress employers. Learning plays no factor in so-called modern education.

      And I assume you visit your local witch doctor when you need medical care...?

    31. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you cut down the list of applicants to interview?

    32. Re:Skill? by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Going to college makes a person no more educated than going to a garage makes them a car.

      One of my classmates literally paid his way through school, he bought all the assignments. At the end of the day, we have the same degree. How does learning to cheat yourself factor into a successful career?

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    33. Re:Skill? by inthealpine · · Score: 1

      As an outsider to this conversation I'd have to say it does seem like you would look at two 'equal' people and the one with the degree would get your nod of approval automatically. Now, that doesn't make you a bad person.
      If that causes some kind of internal conflict with who you think you are, I don't think that's anyone's doing here.

      --
      "In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash"
    34. Re:Skill? by bkaul01 · · Score: 1

      While there are some fields (computer programming being one of the few) that can be readily learned outside of formal education, there are many more that really can't. I certainly wouldn't want to ride in an airplane that had been designed by people who hadn't learned what's taught in accredited engineering programs, for example... Just because you can go get a business degree without learning anything doesn't mean that learning isn't the goal of modern education in general.

      Further, if you're just looking for a job training program or a piece of paper to impress employers, then perhaps higher education isn't right for you anyway. Technical trade schools and the like exist for that, and are much more affordable. There is value that people find in a classical liberal arts education, but that value isn't in job prospects, but in "bettering themselves" through education. People wouldn't pay what they do for a humanities degree if the only reason to get it were to have a piece of paper to impress employers. Those degrees, at the undergraduate level, are essentially useless in the job market as far as any direct correlation between the knowledge they gain and applicability to any particular job.

    35. Re:Skill? by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 1

      I won't hire people who think they're hot shit but haven't gone to college to get the ignorance schooled out of them. .

      Talk about bullshit. Yeah, you're management all right.

      So you will hire people who are humble and have practical experience? That is inferred from your statement, however I somehow seriously doubt that is the case. In the last ten years I have seen companies fall over themselves to hire college graduates who think they're hot shit and have no practical knowledge or experience. The employee is clearly useless, and has to have their hand held and trained by someone with practical experience, then the trainer is let go.

       

      --
      One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
    36. Re:Skill? by inthealpine · · Score: 1

      I had a friend that thought the same way as you. Very smart guy. He enjoyed being in collage so much that the 8 months he had to work in the real world was enough for him and went back to school as is working on a PHD. His entire life goal is to get a PHD and then teach about the real world in a collage (he's History major).
      He fully knows that his loans will be paid for if he plays his cards right and works for the state as a teacher/professor, at least that was his hope. It's like welfare for smart people.

      --
      "In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash"
    37. Re:Skill? by inthealpine · · Score: 1

      I had some major digestive issues that I was about to go to the doctor for. My girlfriends grandmother took out some oils for me, i took two drops with a glass of water every night...never felt better.
      No doctor, no HMO, no government healthcare, no co-pay and I didn't even have to pay for my oil. Just one smart resourceful grandmother.

      With that said of course collage is important and I would ask 'grandma' for a spinal tap, but at the same time does 'grandma' need a medical license to do what she already knows how to do?

      --
      "In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash"
    38. Re:Skill? by inthealpine · · Score: 1

      This is true. I took a Russian History class with an adjunct that the collage hated, but had no choice since he was the most qualified. The reason the collage hated him is because too many of his students received grades of A or B. He was simply the best teacher of any sort I have ever encountered. This guy could splice together Russian history in a way you thought it was an HBO miniseries. When you went to take the tests you couldn't help but know the answers because you were waiting for the next episode.
      Collage hated him though, too many A's and B's and he said himself they would never offer him a job. Sad.

      Oh, and fishexe the Bill O'Reilly 'quote' is about kali sheikh mohammed (mastermind of 9/11) and the context was Bill asking a guest if 9/11 was a terrorist act. Bill wanted the guests opinion on that question, not legal advise about constitutional rights for non US citizens. You should stop taking quotes out of context or people are going to start thinking you're full of shit.

      --
      "In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash"
    39. Re:Skill? by russotto · · Score: 1

      You proved that at least one employer is extremely impressed by the piece of paper.

    40. Re:Skill? by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      How do you cut down the list of applicants to interview?

      Throw out every resumé that has spelling errors, cutesy fonts or the phrase "references available upon request". That's your first cut. The second cut is anyone who tells you what their former job duties were instead of quantifying how well they did the job (i.e. "cashier - handled cash" vs "customer service rep - highest net sales three months in a row").

      Those two steps will probably cut your list by about 90% and you have much higher odds of hiring someone who is motivated and takes pride in what they do.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    41. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how would you expect non-sales people to rate themselves? And wouldn't you rather hear what they did and assume that they weren't fired because they were capable of doing it?

      "Domain Admin - Voted best domain admin by online poll, 36 months in a row"

    42. Re:Skill? by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Oh, and fishexe the Bill O'Reilly 'quote' is about kali sheikh mohammed (mastermind of 9/11) and the context was Bill asking a guest if 9/11 was a terrorist act. Bill wanted the guests opinion on that question, not legal advise about constitutional rights for non US citizens. You should stop taking quotes out of context or people are going to start thinking you're full of shit.

      Or maybe O'Reilly should stop being an asshole demagogue. The full context was that they were having a debate about constitutional rights for non-US citizens, and O'Reilly was trying to railroad it into a discussion of whether something is a terrorist act, which was totally irrelevant. The terms "terrorist act" do not appear in the Constitution, as an exception to due process or anything else. Judge Napolitano was correctly resisting O'Reilly's attempt to change the subject. But as he himself said, O'Reilly doesn't care about the Constitution. At least not what's actually in it.

      Seriously, wtf kind of argument is, "The Constitution isn't here, you're here!"? That's not something you say when someone's dodging a salient question, that's something you say when you don't have a leg to stand on and you just want to call someone a pinhead.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    43. Re:Skill? by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      I had some major digestive issues that I was about to go to the doctor for. My girlfriends grandmother took out some oils for me, i took two drops with a glass of water every night...never felt better. No doctor, no HMO, no government healthcare, no co-pay and I didn't even have to pay for my oil. Just one smart resourceful grandmother.

      I have a couple of thoughts about this. Not sure which reply to post so I'll post both of them (with links, of course):

      (1) Placebos are effective. Or, more precisely, the placebo effect is real and measurable and billions (with a b) of dollars are spent in studies trying to demonstrate not just that new treatments are effective, but that they are more effective than the placebo effect. What's really fascinating is that in the last couple of decades, the effect is increasing (Wired Magazine Article on the phenomenon here...)

      (2) Correlation does not equal causation. Just because you took the oils and then felt better does not mean that the oils were what made you feel better. (Helpful illustration here...)

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    44. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would never debate the value of an education, but feel that modern colleges just aren't providing them. I went to a credible school, was an incredibly serious student and can say I didn't learn anything of any real value from it. My education comes from self guided reading, taking part in user groups, tech conferences and just generally keeping my eye on the industry. I didn't truly even learn those more academic things (Efficiency of different sorts, etc.) until I started investigating them for myself, outside of school. I am now reasonably far in my career at young age (25, Senior Engineer), and frequently feel that my time would have been better spent not attending school. Though I fully appreciate it would have been nearly impossible to start my career without that little piece of paper. I once heard someone describe degrees as a sign of the ability to commit and focus, not a sign of an education, which I feel is a very accurate description.

    45. Re:Skill? by camelrider · · Score: 1

      I wonder who is buying all this information...

    46. Re:Skill? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      A college degree is a helluva lot more than a "piece of paper" (with the exception of some of the more infamous "diploma mills"). If nothing else, it demonstrates that you're not a complete slacker and can at least show up to classes for several years. It shows that you can apply yourself in the long-term to projects and work that may not always be to your liking. It also shows that you can generally function in society, that you're not a quitter, that you at least partially have your shit together, and that you're not a fucking drop-out. All of those things cannot always be shown by some random jackass who just shows up and says "I wrote these programs. See what a great coder I am!" Being a good programmer is neccessary, of course. But showing you can be a good *employee* is also vital if you want me to hire you.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    47. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a recent first class honours CS grad I approve of this but my sense of fair play makes me hope you don't just file all resumes without a CS degree in the bin.

      At least give them a chance to show they know their arse from their elbow in an interview before dismissing them.

      My father never got a degree(though he did help come up with the programs for some) yet retires in the next year from being the acting head of a university department.
      Such is the nature of getting into a field before there were any degrees to be had in the subject.
      He can do magic with machine code and running exe's that I can only dream about.

      My brother was a better programmer before he ever started his CS degree than I am now yet he graduated with a poor degree simply because he was so utterly bored with the program.

      Funny side note-My mother knows Fortran and used to debug code for computers back in the days when you could see the contents of registers by looking at a bank of lightbulbs on something that filled a building yet now has trouble with outlook.

    48. Re:Skill? by DisKurzion · · Score: 1

      Throw out every resumé that has spelling errors, cutesy fonts or the phrase "references available upon request". That's your first cut.

      I'm curious about this point. While I completely agree about spelling errors or cutesy fonts, what is the logic behind cutting based on the phrase "references available upon request"?

      I put it on my resume simply for the privacy of my references, particularly when posting online.

    49. Re:Skill? by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      it proves he's suited to a fast track to management in a fortune 500 company?

    50. Re:Skill? by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 1

      The very clear example of this ignorance being rated 5 and insightful is clear demonstration that this site is now just a mouthpiece for the right wing astro turf. If not. it is merely a clear example of how ignorant the readers are.

      --
      One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
    51. Re:Skill? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I'd hire a web developer with 10 years experience with no degree.

      On the other hand, I wouldn't hire someone with no degree to write OpenGL Windows drivers for consumer grade 3D hardware.

      One job requires you to know how to code, the other requires you to know how to program and do math.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    52. Re:Skill? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      My World Literature professor taught me the value of having high quality fiction in your life and has taught me the miasma that is garbage pulp fiction.

      As a result, I can't get a date with the late 20 something nerd girls who keep spouting off about how great Twilight, Buffy and Firefly are.

      I wish I hadn't gone to college.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    53. Re:Skill? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I went into college knowing a lot, and also knowing that there was more out there I didn't know. During college, I increased the first quantity.

      Did the second quantity increase too?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    54. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to include the goatse link.

    55. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. To increase, it'd need to be finite.

    56. Re:Skill? by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Bad anonymous clicky button! No cookie!

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    57. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

      So you will hire people who are humble and have practical experience?

      Yes. Which as you readily admitted, is already inferred by that statement.

      I don't give two shits what you "seriously doubt" and I've already invalidated the rest of your argument, but nice try. And before you go making any more bullshit assumptions, I bet I code more than you in any given week of the year.

    58. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

      Uhh...no. You convinced yourself that I did.

      Your position has changed from claiming I proved a demonstrably false statement to claiming that I am "extremely impressed" by pieces of paper, which is also wrong. You are provably and factually incorrect.

      There's this thing called "reality" where the state of things don't depend on how you understand them.

    59. Re:Skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think at least part of the point of this article is being missed here. It's not about CS or even a collage education it is person using reverse psychology on a bunch of knows it all kids. He is basically saying "If you think you’re so smart, put your money where your mouth is". I think it is a brilliant way of motivating someone.

    60. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

      Your statement is incorrect on so many levels I don't know where to start.

      Claiming that education is not useless is now right-wing? Seriously? Your thought process is so fucked up that you clearly can't even articulate it.

      By the way, I am pro gay marriage, pro strong government regulation, and pro legalization. So there goes that right-wing posit.

      tl;dr: Shut the hell up.

    61. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

      If two people were truly equal in all other terms, then yes, the degree gets the nod. But why is that objectionable in any way? To claim this should not be the case would be to grant that not having an education is somehow superior to having one. Which makes no sense.

      It's much harder to quantify "experience" - that doesn't mean it should be discounted.

    62. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

      Company's growing and getting lots of buyout offers, but thanks for the concern. I find it curious you immediately jumped to the conclusion that I prefer a degree instead of experience, as if somehow I spurn experienced programmers without degrees, despite having made no such implication.

      I've met enough programmers to know which ones don't need a degree to be effective. There aren't many of them.

    63. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

      And you haven't been in the industry long enough to know that interviews aren't conducted by HR: I'm a hardcore software engineer. I'm just not sure why you brought this up as it wouldn't have made my points any less true even I was in HR.

      Vetting candidates is always challenging, even if you factor out that resumes are complete fabrications. It takes good programmers to spot other good programmers, no amount of education or certification can change that.

    64. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

      Going to college makes a person no more educated than going to a garage makes them a car.

      Speak for yourself.

      One of my classmates literally paid his way through school...How does learning to cheat yourself factor into a successful career?

      This is a straw man argument and I don't know why you think this is relevant to the discussion, do you think I just hire people based on the lies on their resume?

      Are you saying I should hire people who have no experience and no education?

    65. Re:Skill? by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 1

      You were right to call me on my assumptions.I'm not sure why I knee-jerked so hard on that one. My bad.

      --
      One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
    66. Re:Skill? by russotto · · Score: 1

      I'm factually incorrect? Which part? That you're an employer? You claimed you make hiring decisions. That you're extremely impressed by "pieces of paper"? Well, you said that a degree was a necessary condition for you to hire someone. That seems to translate to you being extremely impressed by a degree. That the degree itself is a "piece of paper" -- while most institutions of higher learning do in fact hand out a piece of paper (a diploma) certifying that one has earned a degree, I think all here understand that the "piece of paper" is a metonym for the degree.

    67. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1
      You can stop trying now, you lost about 3 posts ago.

      Well, you said that a degree was a necessary condition for you to hire someone.

      No...I never said that. Go re-read it, you need to work on your reading comprehension.

      That seems to translate to you being extremely impressed by a degree.

      Even if that premise were true, the conclusion doesn't follow. I could require a degree and still heavily vet candidates (in fact, I do vet everyone that claims the required skills). After reading comprehension, try taking a logic course.

      You know, maybe at a university?

    68. Re:Skill? by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this reply was meant for a different post. Not sure if I had some kind of cookie issue or I just screwed up. Regardless please disregard.

      --
      One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
    69. Re:Skill? by russotto · · Score: 1

      You can stop trying now, you lost about 3 posts ago.

      Eh, the lurkers with mod points agree with me.

    70. Re:Skill? by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

      Except that doesn't change the fact that you're wrong. Nice try changing it to a meta-topic though, since you've been proven so wrong on the main points.

    71. Re:Skill? by xmvince · · Score: 1

      what the fuck are you talking about

  2. I bet... by Dumnezeu · · Score: 1

    ...this will go down in flames.

    --
    Yes, it's sarcasm. Deal with it!
    1. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main problem in most american university is already the stupid competition promoted by the way grades and honors are discerned. Everyone know stories about a student giving false informations to a "friend" that might be in his way to be the first, when these people work in their field after getting their degree and honors they are lazy and don't make much effort except to get a promotion, and again they will make anything they can to break everyone else chances.

  3. Good idea or bad idea... by euphemistic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On one hand this feels wrong, on the other I think I would have got a motivation boost back in university if this were around then. I also kind of like the idea for potentially rewarding students for pushing themselves academically. I'm torn.

    1. Re:Good idea or bad idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm more torn as to the idea that I make the "safe" bet that I get a B and then I get an A. If this means I 'lose' the bet, what'll I do?

      If I know that I'll be getting an A, but if I bomb my final I'll get a B BUT also gain $200, I might bomb my final for the strict purpose of winning the bet. This is due to the fact that immediate pleasure, ie $200 right at the end, is far more desirable by most people then some ambiguous future benefit due to having an A over a B.

      Hopefully, the way the system works is that bets are minimum levels of necessity to pass and, if you surpass your bet, you get a smaller, but still existent bonus payoff. For example, if you bet on a B grade for $200 but got an A, you'd get $220 but if you'd bet straight for an A you'd have gotten $300.

      But then, this is fairly greedy too. At very least, getting a grade above your bet should allow you to gain what you'd have had if you'd forcibly lowered your grade for the purpose of winning the bet. Once you get into "bonuses" for going above safe bets, it'll lead to difficulties.

      Anyhow, this just means I'd have put into a ton of cake classes for extra money and to fulfill core requirements. Sup Phil 100, Math 100, Eng 100, etc. Little too late for me though.

    2. Re:Good idea or bad idea... by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Anyhow, this just means I'd have put into a ton of cake classes for extra money and to fulfill core requirements. Sup Phil 100, Math 100, Eng 100, etc. Little too late for me though.

      If it is worth it to you to pay money for the class that will teach you nothing, just so you can get a good grade and win your bet, well, you will probably lose in the end. I've just enrolled at Regis University, and at $350-$450/credit hour I most certainly would prefer to avoid the remedial classes. $1050 for a class just to win a bet, well I still had to pay for the class and didn't even learn anything.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    3. Re:Good idea or bad idea... by turkeydance · · Score: 2, Funny

      the NCAA won't allow this. THEY will control all gambling about colleges. (old Outer Limits intro) students actually rewarded with MONEY for doing good while IN college? OMG

    4. Re:Good idea or bad idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was talking about the core requirements that you need to take anyhow.

      For me, I really did try taking things to expand my horizons and learn new things that challenged me which...gave me a few hits on my GPA but taught me quite a lot.

      If I'd taking, I dunno, underwater basket weaving instead of that ethics class on medicine, I could've made some extra bucks and fulfilled core requirements at the same time.

  4. Yep, make my school records public. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Is it proper for a school to, or appear to, allow a third party automated access to student records where this third party is not playing a role in providing education services.

    1. Re:Yep, make my school records public. by Moridin42 · · Score: 1

      When the student must explicitly permit it, yeah sure, why not?

      --
      I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
    2. Re:Yep, make my school records public. by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      It is proper for the school to allow access to anyone the student permits.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    3. Re:Yep, make my school records public. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learned in my "Bachelor of Science - Information System Security" :
      Student grades are protected by a set of rules much like medical records are. The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974.
      It is a lot like HIPPA but for student privacy. And it does cover grades.

  5. In other words... by mldi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who's the best at cheating?

    Now cheating pays two-fold.

    --
    If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    1. Re:In other words... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      In other words, access to your student records (which probably includes your SSN and lots of other juicy details about you) is worth a payout a scammer probably won't pay anyway.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  6. Smart by pwnies · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the "grade insurance" option isn't used much, it looks like a good way to get college kids to work. Direct monetary benefit was one of the reasons my GPA shot up my Junior and Senior year (I had a job that payed me more for better grades).

    1. Re:Smart by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      My school offered something similar. Students who entered with a high enough average were given a scholarship, based on their admittance average. Anywhere from $1500 to $3500 a year. Tuition was around $4000 a year. You got to keep the scholarship in each successive year, but only if you maintained an 8.0/10.0 average. Even though the monetary incentive was there, most people still didn't get their scholarship in the second year. I think it's because the scale was so screwed up. A+ = 10, A = 9, A- = 8, B+ = 7, B = 6, C+ = 5, C = 4, D + = 3, D = 2, E = 1, F = 0. So, if you got 1 B mark in any of yor courses, to bring your average up to an 8, you would have to get an A in 2 courses, and A+. It was very hard to maintain such an average. A single bad course could through your average way off.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Smart by shermo · · Score: 1

      I think it's because the scale was so screwed up. If you got 1 B mark in any of yor courses, to bring your average up to an 8, you would have to get an A in 2 courses

      Yes, this is how averages work!

      I doubt it was supposed to be 'easy' since there's money on the line. If everyone was supposed to get the scholarship, then it ceases being a scholarship and instead becomes a welfare system.

      I'm sure there are a number of people here who would easily have met the 8/10 requirement.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    3. Re:Smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the "grade insurance" option isn't used much, it looks like a good way to get college kids to work. Direct monetary benefit was one of the reasons my GPA shot up my Junior and Senior year (I had a job that payed me more for better grades).

      Is that when they stopped caring about your writing skills?

  7. Finally, just what we've all been wishing for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... an incentive to flunk.

  8. What do mice have to do with anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Money where your mouse is?

  9. What about *other* students? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What about betting on other students' grades? OK, we'll call it "investing": how about SHORTING the other students' grades?

  10. I grade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    samzenpus an F.

  11. Unless the Bell Curve is there by xav_jones · · Score: 1

    Assuming you reach your potential then -- if you are graded to a normal distribution -- it comes down to the luck of who is in your class as to where you end up.

    1. Re:Unless the Bell Curve is there by m1ss1ontomars2k4 · · Score: 1

      Your comment does not make sense. The distribution of others' abilities are going to be about the same no matter when you take the class, as the group made up of a (not quite) random sample of the same population.

  12. Professors don't make enough... by PsychoticSpoon · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they would consider giving kickbacks to professors for failing students who've bet on themselves.

    1. Re:Professors don't make enough... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I'm more thinking that it would open up for a different kind of fraud,, where the student AND teacher corroborate.
      The teacher gives a grade C student fifty grand to bet on gettting an A, then gives the student an A, gets his fifty grand back, and the teacher and student splits the rest.

    2. Re:Professors don't make enough... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Professors really don't make enough for that plan.

  13. Fine by earthforce_1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bet $1Billion you will get an F, then don't show up for the exam. For that kind of sum I won't bother repeating the year - in fact, I won't bother even going back to school.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Fine by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bet $1 Billion you didn't RTFA.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Fine by Moridin42 · · Score: 1

      Right.. because if you go to the track, you can put money that the horse with the highest odds of winning comes in last.

      Oh wait.. you can't.

      --
      I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
    3. Re:Fine by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Bet $1Billion you will get an F, then don't show up for the exam.

      Gee, I wonder what they've set the odds on someone betting they'd get an F and then going and getting an F.

      If it were me I'd make it 1:1.

      On second thought... if you really thought this was clever I'll set the payout odds at 1:10. (That's right 1:10 not 10:1 -- so if you are dumb enough to place that bet I'll keep 90% of your cash if you win, and all of it if you manage to lose.)

    4. Re:Fine by e4g4 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're absolutely right. I'm sure they didn't think of that massive loophole before putting this site together...

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Fine by hipp5 · · Score: 1

      Bet $1Billion you will get an F, then don't show up for the exam. For that kind of sum I won't bother repeating the year - in fact, I won't bother even going back to school.

      That was my first thought, until I RTFA. They have capped bets. The limit increases the more you use the system, but I doubt it ever increases to the point where a single statistical anomaly (aka a forced F) would bankrupt them.

    6. Re:Fine by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually, you can... Betfair and many other betting exchanges allow you to do that. Maybe not accessible for most of you US-ians, but I'm not sure how access has been affected by your archaic anti-gambling stance over there.

    7. Re:Fine by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Odds are given as win ratios. So 1:10 means you get paid your initial bet plus 10%. I'm assuming you used this service in your probability class.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    8. Re:Fine by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Gee, I wonder what they've set the odds on someone betting they'd get an F and then going and getting an F.

      If it were me I'd make it 1:1.

      On second thought... if you really thought this was clever I'll set the payout odds at 1:10. (That's right 1:10 not 10:1 -- so if you are dumb enough to place that bet I'll keep 90% of your cash if you win, and all of it if you manage to lose.)

      With 1:10 odds, a bet of $100 would yield a $110 payout.

    9. Re:Fine by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Odds are given as win ratios. So 1:10 means you get paid your initial bet plus 10%. I'm assuming you used this service in your probability class.

      Lol. Quite Right. Not sure where my head was just now. I actually did well in statistics. :)

    10. Re:Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its more of a stance against online gambling that various levels of government don't have the ability to tax fully.

    11. Re:Fine by PiAndWhippedCream · · Score: 1

      I bet $1 Billion you didn't RTFA.

      This is idle, GP didn't read the summary, probably didn't read the title. I know I didn't.

    12. Re:Fine by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Well I wager I'm going to flunk sarcasm and reading, now where do I collect my check?

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    13. Re:Fine by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "We have calculated the probability of you flunking your class or better to be 1, therefore your odds are 1:1. Thank you for your investment of $1b minus a transaction fee of 1%; You can expect your "winnings" of $0.99b to be deposited into your account at the end of your course.

      We hoped you enjoyed studying Media and Advertising!"

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    14. Re:Fine by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      But isn't a cucumber that small called a gherkin?

      (...waits for the Offtopic mod instead of Funny...)

  14. Smells bad to me. by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

    Ultrinsic's CEO Steven Woldf insists it's not online gambling, since these wagers involve skill. He says 'The students have 100 percent control over it, over how they do. Other people's stuff you bet on — your own stuff you invest in.'"

    Real gambling involves skill too. I know an amateur who is very good at poker, and he can make money with it (not alot, but when you regularly come out ahead, that's skill).

    This is gambling. Whether or not it's ok is another question, but the fact that this guy says "it's not gambling" makes me suspect the whole outfit. This is a business, and they are playing the odds that students don't hit the mark.

    Not to mention the privacy concerns. From ultrinsic

    the Site will request that you submit your social security number in order to send you a Form 1099,

    Couple that with your entire school records, and you have given this company your identity information. Do you trust them with that? Maybe you should read the terms of service on their signup page

    1. Re:Smells bad to me. by julesh · · Score: 1

      Real gambling involves skill too.

      So does investing in the stock market, but that isn't considered gambling by most people. What's the difference? Where do you draw the line?

    2. Re:Smells bad to me. by profplump · · Score: 1

      Many people would say that poker isn't gambling either, specifically because you can be "good" at it, and because you can throw a hand. I dare you to be "good" at Keno or "throw" a spin of roulette. Even if you don't agree with that definition you probably shouldn't use poker as an example of what is or is not gambling unless you want your argument to be overshadowed by the comparison.

  15. Academic History Information by Adambomb · · Score: 1

    If this does go forward, how long will it be before we hear about their new Academic History Database, now available to employers for a hefty annual subscription or by a per usage fee.

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
    1. Re:Academic History Information by profplump · · Score: 1

      Employers that care about grade already ask for grades, sometimes even requiring applicants to provide official transcripts at their own cost. There's no reason employers would pay for such a service when they can get it for free.

      That's not to say that this information won't be sold, just that the particular business model you propose is unlikely.

  16. get your professor involved by rritterson · · Score: 1

    Easiest way to make a sure buck ever: just convince the professor to fix your grades and give him/her part of the profit.

    You don't even have to be that pernicious-- just ask the professor how many points you'd have to lose to get a sure B or C, and then ensure you get a B or C.

    Bet enough and you won't even care what grades you decide to give yourself since you won't have to work.

    --
    -Ryan
    AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
  17. 21 by cosm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Game the system. If there are not betting limits, heres what you do.

    1. Attend college on list for a few semesters, fail most classes, but not enough to get kicked out.
    2. Bet double your accumulated tuition cost, and then overload on your mickey mouse degree classes.
    3. No xxxxxxxx step, just straight profit

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:21 by hipp5 · · Score: 1

      Game the system. If there are not betting limits, heres what you do. 1. Attend college on list for a few semesters, fail most classes, but not enough to get kicked out. 2. Bet double your accumulated tuition cost, and then overload on your mickey mouse degree classes. 3. No xxxxxxxx step, just straight profit

      If you RTFA you'd see that they have limits on your bets. You can't bet enough to make it worthwhile to flush your tuition down the drain or to throw a few semesters.

    2. Re:21 by dcollins · · Score: 1

      "Game the system. If there are not [sic] betting limits, heres [sic] what you do..."

      FTA: "The student decides how much to wager up to a cap that starts at $25 and increases with use."

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    3. Re:21 by cosm · · Score: 1

      Who RTFA? And plus, my "if" justifies my outrageous claim! And sensationalist "ifs" get more mod points here anyways. Just look at the post regarding the wikileaks stuff regarding civilian name disclosure. This statement is being made in in a half joking, half serious manner, btw.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    4. Re:21 by cosm · · Score: 1

      "Game the system. If there are not [sic] betting limits, heres [sic] what you do..."

      FTA: "The student decides how much to wager up to a cap that starts at $25 and increases with use."

      On that note, I still didn't read the full article, but could a progressive system work for this grade casino? Mathematicians?

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    5. Re:21 by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Short answer: No.

      Long answer: Technically "not enough information", because the article doesn't specify details on what "increases with use" means. The company does not release details on its exact algorithm. But presumably, like any casino or insurance company, their calculations don't allow for any such thing.

      Pithy answer: As I overheard the pizzeria guy say to the bum tonight asking for a free slice, "Yeah sure, sure -- 'cuz I'm in business to just give stuff away."

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    6. Re:21 by swillden · · Score: 1

      2. Bet double your accumulated tuition cost, and then overload on your mickey mouse degree classes.

      Did you miss the part where you have to submit your schedule as well as your transcripts? Unless their system sucks, it'll notice that you're taking mickey mouse crap and give you bad odds so that you won't make much.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:21 by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Game the system. If there are not betting limits, heres what you do. 1. Attend college on list for a few semesters, fail most classes, but not enough to get kicked out. 2. Bet double your accumulated tuition cost, and then overload on your mickey mouse degree classes. 3. No xxxxxxxx step, just straight profit

      If you RTFA you'd see that they have limits on your bets. You can't bet enough to make it worthwhile to flush your tuition down the drain or to throw a few semesters.

      Who says your tuition was flushed down the drain? You're allowed to learn all the material, just pretend you don't for the exam.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  18. good idea but problems are garatneed by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    This will let teachers troll for payoff kickbacks, a good-size scandal is almost certain.

    1. Re:good idea but problems are garatneed by hipp5 · · Score: 1

      This will let teachers troll for payoff kickbacks, a good-size scandal is almost certain.

      That was my concern, but it seems like bet limits might not make that worthwhile. It seems like you can only bet a few tens of dollars at first. Even with some of the best odds (100:1 for a 1st year betting that they'll have a 4.0 at the end of four years) you can't stand to win more than 2 or 3 thousand dollars. To ensure winning that bet you'd have to have a bunch of profs in on it. And if you try to ensure a bet where it only takes one prof, the odds are going to be much lower and there won't likely be enough payoff for the two of you to put your necks on the line.

  19. Get your professor a cut by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    You don't even have to be that pernicious-- just ask the professor how many points you'd have to lose to get a sure B or C, and then ensure you get a B or C.

    Pretty sure you are wagering against "B or better" and not "B- to B+", otherwise someone with good grades could wager heavily against getting and F get good odds and 'take a dive' for a huge payout.

    Still, profs are human too, and can be bribed like anyone else. I would guess that you are wagering against you total GPA though.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  20. Yeah ... "complete control" ... by powerlord · · Score: 1

    FTFA:

    'The students have 100 percent control over it, over how they do. Other people's stuff you bet on -- your own stuff you invest in.'

    Of course, if you happen to take a class with a teacher that NEVER gives A's, then it doesn't matter HOW good you are (unless you're the second coming of Dykstra?), and yes, I had a few of those in Undergrad (for required classes).

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  21. unlucky by Gerard+Ketuma · · Score: 1

    if you bet, then intuitively there is some factor of luck involved. however, you dont get your grades in school by luck. it is under your control. however i have to say there is luck sometimes, in that some teachers are better than others and your grade depends on who your teacher is. some teachers explain things clearly and can break down any subject to your level of understanding, and others are just there because they have tenure. so there is luck in that respect. but overall it is up to the students.

    --
    http://weboven.blogspot.com
  22. Will this end up like the mob with blackmail and p by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Will this end up like the mob with blackmail and people taking a dive?

    will the site pay professors to lower grades to get out having to make pay outs?

    with the colleges put a stop to this?

  23. 36 American colleges by mysidia · · Score: 1

    grades from students at 36 American colleges.

    Are these colleges whose professors will be sure to include some subjective questions on every test and take a kickback in exchange for subtracting points from a student's grade?

    For this 'betting' company to be profitable, the students have to lose most of the time....

    Oh right, it's this "betting" thing that makes it gambling. There is skill involved, but like in Poker, there is a huge element of random chance involved as well (what questions get chosen to be asked on the test), and how the student reacts sometimes based on hunch to things that are unknown and things that are known.

    The student could be extremely skilled, but too many unfair or 'unbeatable' (despite skill) questions got placed on (possibly rigged) tests.

    E.g. Student doesn't know answer to multiple-choice question #23... do they just lose, or do they enter a random answer, and hope for the best? (Element of chance)

    HTH: I don't buy the argument that it's not gambling, and I question whether a judge or other authorities would buy that argument, also.

  24. And you should have learned by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    You should have learned in your studies, when you permit external access security is compromised.

    Not to say that school has good security, but it creates another potential attack vector.

    1. Re:And you should have learned by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      I agree that permitting external access can compromise your information security, but that is not the question that was asked, so it is not the question that I answered. The question was simply should the school allow access to your personal files. My answer, equivalent to how medical records are allowed to be released if you give signed permission, was that it is proper for schools to release your information IF you have given permission.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
  25. A better system? by pspahn · · Score: 1

    Why not just have students pay a scaling subscription fee? You pay your $50/mo (or $25, or $200, whatever) and if you get an A they pay for a percentage of your tuition based on your subscription rate.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  26. Damned if you do, damned if you don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no way for this to escape regulation by definition chasing. It's either gambling, or it's insurance.

  27. Or too much material by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    I've sat an exam once or twice where almost no one finished the exam in the allotted time because there was too much material.

    The professors heavily curved the exam grades in that case.

    It's not common, but there is a bit of an art to properly designing an exam so that it can be completed by students who have what should be an acceptable level of mastery of the material, in the given time.

    1. Re:Or too much material by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      I've sat an exam once or twice where almost no one finished the exam in the allotted time because there was too much material.

      The professors heavily curved the exam grades in that case.

      It's not common, but there is a bit of an art to properly designing an exam so that it can be completed by students who have what should be an acceptable level of mastery of the material, in the given time.

      I've taken a class that had 30 exams in the course of a year that weren't finished by more than 2% of the students (always 0 or 1 in a class of ~60) thanks to time constraints. The curve varied wildly from week to week, sometimes giving an A for a 60, sometimes an A for a 30. There was a huge degree of noise in those grades, enough that I'm only confident that a few students got the grades they deserved (the consistent top 10% and bottom 10% of the class).

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Or too much material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure I was in that class (choose any one of probably 3 or 4 classes I had first two years)...

    3. Re:Or too much material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes it more interesting when, in those sorts of classes, you are competing against the frat boys with their test library access, and the study buddies of the aforementioned frat boys. The majority of my classes at the highly prestigious engineering school I attended were just as you describe. I still have a very very bad taste in my mouth 20 years later. I know I was more capable than many of my classmates. But I chose to compete on the basis of my own abilities. It was a losing strategy. A large part of my education was that the system is rigged against the honest man, doubly so against the poor honest man.

  28. some people don't have the cash for degrees or don by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    some people don't have the cash for degrees or don't want the loans.

    how about people who went to tech schools / on line?

    room and board is like $8000-$10000 a year now at some places.

    so what about people who did the job and did not go to big 4 year school? Why should they get passed over for a JOB?

  29. Or team based where others can make your grade by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Or team based where others can make your grade go up or down.

  30. on the other hand... by mestar · · Score: 1

    The site also allows professors to take the other side of the bet.

  31. It might work ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... if the professors look like this.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  32. Nonsense by b4upoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Obviously the prejudice of a professor can play heavily upon grades. Most of us have seen it in action. Sometimes it's the old guy who gives great grades to pretty girls and hates anyone on the football team. The next time around may be the opposite. Perhaps only the football team gets a break on grades. The point being that it is flat out bonkers to think that the student is the only one in charge of his grades.

    1. Re: Nonsense by julesh · · Score: 1

      Obviously the prejudice of a professor can play heavily upon grades. Most of us have seen it in action. Sometimes it's the old guy who gives great grades to pretty girls and hates anyone on the football team. The next time around may be the opposite. Perhaps only the football team gets a break on grades. The point being that it is flat out bonkers to think that the student is the only one in charge of his grades

      At my school, papers and exams were anonymized before grading. Is this not standard practice?

    2. Re: Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why examinations should be anonymus. They were at my university.

    3. Re: Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys should really adopt the english way of doing things - just writing your candidate number on it (and having the corner glued down with name/signiture under)

    4. Re: Nonsense by hairykrishna · · Score: 1

      It is at our university (Birmingham, UK). How anonymous they actually are varies strongly as a function of class size.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  33. How about hedging? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Can you sell yourself short?

    Actually, the whole thing smells of insider trading.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  34. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by Lifyre · · Score: 1

    He said nothing about what school you went to or how you got your degree. I can get a BS in many things from respectable online schools that are just as legit as actually being on campus. The only things that are sometimes hard to do are practical application but many programs offer ways to do that too. The Vet Tech school my wife is looking at lets her do her practicals at many local or at least relatively local practicing vets.

    But they got passed over because they obvious either are unqualified or they obviously do not have the self drive to get that "meaningless" piece of paper that is worth so much money (poor decision making skills). And before you play the affordability game, it is very easy to work your way through school if you are willing to go to a local community college and then a state school.

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  35. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by ergrthjuyt · · Score: 1

    +1. I've met people in their 30s still working on their degrees who were excellent programmers, and people fresh out of tech school who couldn't tell a compiler from their ass. It's not about paying tribute, its about showing you're not stuck up enough to actually shut up and try to learn something.

    A small minority can also learn everything they need to on the job, but they'd have to be exceptionally driven, humble, and intelligent to be able to reach their full potential that way.

  36. restrictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'd better only allow bets of the form "grade is at least x"; otherwise I can just see the "WTF the professor gave me an A+ instead of an A? ARGGHHH!"...

  37. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make awfully good points but with awfully bad grammar. I'm guessing you are one of the people that didn't want the loans, went to a tech school, or otherwise didn't get an education and was passed over for a job.

    The parent had a point, and you completely missed it because you don't know what you don't know... and it showed in your post.

  38. They want full school account access. by TreyGeek · · Score: 1
    From their Terms and Conditions:

    Access to School Account. By providing Ultrinsic with your username and password for your online school account, you authorize Ultrinsic to access the account and to view and record any information in your account.

    There's a lot they can potentially access beyond a simple transcript and course schedule. At least at my school, computer lab logins, library account, tuition and fees, financial aid, even purchasing a parking permit is all done through the same UN/PW pair.

    1. Re:They want full school account access. by profplump · · Score: 1

      First, you should not give them your credentials. You should create their own credentials and grant them access to the appropriate parts of your account. If your grade system does not allow this you shouldn't sign up -- it's not worth the risk. Plus I'm guessing they don't support such systems anyway; most big schools have allowed students to create third-party logins for their employer/parents/etc. for a while now.

      Second, while they might intend to mine your account for other information, and the agreement language certainly allows it, my guess is that's just boilerplate language to avoid any liability if their scraping script fetches the wrong page, or if someone debugging the script sees some other data in your account.

  39. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Around 1997 a friend asked me to install Windows95 on his girlfriend's computer for her. I thought this was an odd request, since she had graduated from Computer Science at the University of Western Ontario that week...
    I thought that was nuts. And then during the Y2K upgrade boom, I was asked to install a bunch of new machines for 15 (newly graduated, but from where I don't know) programmers hired to work at a government office. I was asked to set up the development environment as well because - wait for it - none of them knew how to install any of the tools. None of them! WTF?!
    It boggled my mind that people who have no idea how to use a computer were getting degrees in computer science.

  40. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile over here in Sweden higher education is still free and you get some money to get by with + loan opportunities.

    Loans or not are up to you, it may be stupid to take the courses if you 1) won't make any money while taking them, 2) have to loan a bunch of money and 3) don't think the advantage of having taken them will render the former two non-issues.

  41. Call me when there's enough in the pot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me when there's enough in the pot to make it profitable enought to "throw the match". No, you won't get your BS degree, but if you walk with a big enough purse, do you really care? Audit the rest of your courses and/or get an internship someplace if you still want to pull in some more bills.

  42. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Computer Science:

    It is not what you think it is. They were learning algorithms and theory, mathematics and data structures.

    You were doing MIS based things.

    What if they were using IRIX or Solaris? Would you have been at home on those systems?

  43. I'd be really interested ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... in the odds I'm getting as a professor:

    Here's how Wolf says the website works: A student registers, uploads his or her schedule and gives Ultrinsic access to official school records. The New York-based site then calculates odds based on the student's college history and any information it can dig up on the difficulty of each class, the topic and other factors. The student decides how much to wager up to a cap that starts at $25 and increases with use.

    Presumably, bets on classes taught by the harder professors would pay more for an A? I wonder if the tenure and promotion committee would be interested in the published odds?

  44. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by elfprince13 · · Score: 1

    Computer Science is now more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes.

  45. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    Typical problem of universities (I've also studied at a university myself): they teach how/why stuff works from a highly theoretical pov, not how it is used in practice. This gives a great basis for deeper understanding but most practical things are not learned in university but in real life.

  46. CS vs. IT by Venner · · Score: 1

    It doesn't surprise me much. I went to school from EE & CmpE, but the department had absorbed the CS program and I knew/worked with most of those students as well. I would say that 50% of the CS grads were one-trick ponies. They could hack together a program in MFC and that was it. They've probably gone on to be managers :-) Day to day IT work (building computers, installing software, setting up networks, etc) is not taught in a CS program -- it is IT, not CS, after all -- but one does kind of expect people in the CS field to at least have a minimal IT competence, right?

    There were, of course, a few CS people I thought very highly of and would hire in a minute, including a guy who I would definitely hire if I ever wanted to knock over the world's banks. (Seems like there is always one brilliant and misguided computer hacker in every class.) On the other hand, there were definitely some class anchors. One guy I remember asking me a question that floored me. Bear in mind, this came from a senior CS major, final semester, in an advanced compilers class. "I just read the project assignment but...what's a command prompt?" Really. He wasn't faking. He'd never done any programming in anything but a GUI, never done any manual debugging, and had only ever owned a Mac.

    I changed gears for grad school (physics / nuclear) and then law school, but I always loved the low-level CS/CmpE stuff. Chip design, assembly programming (barring the x86 instruction set - blech), electronics/software interfacing. Kind of miss it, especially when I get some cool project idea in my head and have zero equipment to implement it with.

    --
    A preposition is a terrible thing to end a sentence with.
    1. Re:CS vs. IT by Albatrosses · · Score: 1

      "What's a command prompt?" He'd [...] only ever owned a Mac

      Then tell him it's another word for Terminal :)

  47. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by cOldhandle · · Score: 1

    Maybe they were taught computer science, and not IT administration? I think it would be pretty pathetic to teach Windows installation in a CS course. (Although I admit, it shows their laziness and lack of interest to not bother to learn that simple stuff on their own.)

  48. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    Typical problem of universities (I've also studied at a university myself): they teach how/why stuff works from a highly theoretical pov, not how it is used in practice. This gives a great basis for deeper understanding but most practical things are not learned in university but in real life.

    There is no way that a University can teach the practical skills for the wide variety of jobs available. Either you would end up so specialized that you would have to go get another 'degree' if you wanted to move into an adjacent field, or they would need to make it so generic that you would have to create specialized schools for each... and we are back at the same problem.

    If you want practical, go to a tech school. If you have an interest in a field and want more of the theory/traditional education, college is for you.

    Neither should have a stigma, we need good technical workers. They certainly command a decent paycheck.

    Dont turn college into a vocational training center, trying that and denigrating votech has really hurt our educational system.

    (sorry for typos, injured my hands)

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  49. very profitable for them by Rasta_the_far_Ian · · Score: 1

    Let there be a student s that does this for each semester over 4 consecutive years. Assume that the website loses $k each year that the student gambles. Further, assume that the site does nothing with the data for the next 10 years. How much will the website make off of student s over the course of the remainder of student s lifetime?

    It is given (in the article summary) that the website requires access to official records, so they will have verified data.

    They can sell this information for a good bit of money every time student s looks for a job over the rest of his/her lifetime!

    1. Re:very profitable for them by profplump · · Score: 1

      Employers who care already can and do ask applicants to provide grades, sometimes even requiring an official transcript at the applicant's expense. Why would employers suddenly be willing to pay some third party for this information when they're already getting it for free. Plus you probably don't want to work someplace that uses grades to make hiring decisions, at least not for anyone other than 0-experience recent graduates, because they obviously have bad HR practices.

      The company might be looking to mine data here, but the model you suggest seems unlikely. It would have to be something much more indirect, where grades are not already available -- like basing your iTunes or health insurance costs on your college grades (not that either of those are terribly plausible examples, but some might exist) -- because students are typically willing to share their grades at no cost with anyone who has even a vaguely legitimate reason to ask.

  50. Ponzi Scheme or Pessimism at its Finest? by Haydon+Jurai · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a bad Ponzi Scheme. Any college student smart enough to be confident they'll get good grades is also smart enough not to fall for such a scam. Or maybe the founders just expect that many kids to be fail out on both counts?

    1. Re:Ponzi Scheme or Pessimism at its Finest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe they'll adjust the odds to equalize betting, like every other bookmaker does -- there's a little more guessing here than events with binary outcomes (sports, for example), but it should still be possible to make statistically sound estimates of grade outcomes and adjust the spreads and payouts accordingly.

      That being said, it could just as easily be a Ponzi scheme, intentional or otherwise.

  51. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

    so what about people who did the job and did not go to big 4 year school? Why should they get passed over for a JOB?

    Um..because they did not go to a big 4 year school and someone else did? It's like asking why the person with the shifty eyes, the funny smell, or the lack of professional references keeps being passed up over other people. Hiring involves a selection process, not simply picking a random person who claims he/she can do the job reliably for the long term. If you're hiring and you want a person that doesn't smells odd or you do want to have a person with a college degree because you believe they'll relate better with all the current college graduate staff, you'll make a choice of them over others.

    Put more simply. Life isn't fair. Hiring and firing doubly so.

    --
    Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  52. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by fishexe · · Score: 1

    so what about people who did the job and did not go to big 4 year school? Why should they get passed over for a JOB?

    Because they type like you and still expect to be taken seriously?

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  53. Shouldn't boggle your mind by fishexe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It boggled my mind that people who have no idea how to use a computer were getting degrees in computer science.

    "Computer Science is as much about computers as Astronomy is about telescopes." --Edsger Dijkstra

    (something you might know if you'd taken more CS courses)

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    1. Re:Shouldn't boggle your mind by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is to say (albeit inadvertently), a HUGE fscking part. Please show me an expert astronomer who doesn't know a shitload about telescopes -- not the least of which is how to use them -- because I'm pretty sure there's no such creature.

      At any rate, ignorance should be neither encouraged nor excused. Most CS grads are trying to become *programmers*, not computer scientists, and not understanding how to install software is, at the very least, indicative of either gross incompetence, or an utter disregard for your profession. It's like a plumber not understanding that water doesn't magically appear in the supply line, or what to do if it's not there.

      Unless your sole task is answering whether P=NP, then learn about one or more computer architectures, as well as one or more operating systems... preferably *before* you apply for a job, or else as a part of personal development or, as R. Lee Ermey would say, " You had best unfuck yourself or I will unscrew your head and shit down your neck!"

      Dismissed.

  54. Brilliant! But... by fishexe · · Score: 1

    2. Bet double your accumulated tuition cost, and then overload on your mickey mouse degree classes.

    ...why stop at double?

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  55. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by julesh · · Score: 1

    Around 1997 a friend asked me to install Windows95 on his girlfriend's computer for her. I thought this was an odd request, since she had graduated from Computer Science at the University of Western Ontario that week...
    I thought that was nuts. And then during the Y2K upgrade boom, I was asked to install a bunch of new machines for 15 (newly graduated, but from where I don't know) programmers hired to work at a government office. I was asked to set up the development environment as well because - wait for it - none of them knew how to install any of the tools. None of them! WTF?!
    It boggled my mind that people who have no idea how to use a computer were getting degrees in computer science.

    During my CS degree at around the same timeframe, the only computers we touched were running SunOS and, later, Solaris. There's nothing there that can prepare you for the brain-dead behaviour of Microsoft installers.

    (True fact: I spent a day yesterday trying to install Visual Studio 2005 SP1... turns out Windows Update has a default size limit for updates that's smaller than the size of the service pack, so it fails to install it unless you hack the registry to put on a larger limit)

  56. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by drewhk · · Score: 1

    When you get into higher and higher education, you always feel that the previous educational level was much easier than the current one. You learn more in Primary School than in Kindergarten, you learn more in High School than in Primary School and then you learn more in University than in High School.

    Now it is not at all surprising, that you may learn more at your first job than at your University. Learning process accelerates (at least you feel so).

    Also, take into consideration that when you learn purely theoretic stuff, then you learn not just that stuff itself, but you are exercising your abstraction capabilities. Just remember how strange and foreign some concepts sounded at the beginning of the University, and how natural they became at the end of it! It is not about "I will never ever use [insert your fav. theorem here] in my life", it is about preparing your brain for interpreting abstractions.

  57. Hi by susan08 · · Score: 1

    Certainly this was a good post. Pretty good information shared. Thanks for the article. Keep it up the good work. http://www.online-insurance-quotes.org/

  58. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by prionic6 · · Score: 1

    I think the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights says it best: "No person may be forced to install or have installed on any machine Microsoft Windows 95 or any derivative of it under any circumstance, no matter what they have done". There is also a special declaration of suggested physical punishment for Windows ME...

  59. why this biz will make millions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) because most people overestimate their own skills, and
    2) compulsive gamblers would use this service to their own demise because they're too busy gambling at the casino to study anyway
    3) they obviously try to stack the odds against you in the first place

  60. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Oh come on, any engineer or scientist should have been able to install Windows 95. There's nothing especially wonderful about computer science that means you have to cultivate an Olympian disregard for the everyday world.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  61. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right. Should we use the highly skilled and therefore highly compensated computer scientist to install windows 95. Or should we get the "computer guy" to do it, since we can get away with paying him much less? If you were running a business with those resources available, wouldn't you allocate them in a similar fashion?

  62. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by inthealpine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When most of my friends and myself graduated from college we found to just forget 95% of what we learned in collage and start learning reality at our new jobs. I think that half the collage students career paths would be better served if the students were an apprentice for a year or two. You might even get paid to do it, while learning real job skills. Not to mention that not having collage loans that haunt you for most of your life would be great.

    --
    "In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash"
  63. Oh, the pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of the trauma that kids will face when they find out Grandma is betting against them.

  64. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 1

    I can get a BS in many things from respectable online schools that are just as legit as actually being on campus.

    Roflmao. I have attempted to try this myself. I got good grades (because I called the "instructors" on their bullshit), but found myself teaching the teacher and taking the teachers part in the online discussion, because all they did was cut and paste crappy discussion questions from past classes that didn't even pertain to what was being discussed. They would grade hard at the beginning of the class ( often counting things wrong that were not wrong, such as when a teacher tried to tell me that drivers and applications were not software) and easy at the end of the class to simulate improvement. They would cut and paste previous feedback on assignments that either didn't match the assignment or were completely general, almost like a John Edward routine. It was ridiculous. And it was a well known online school, who charge MORE for this crap than a conventional university and continue to take Pell grants and federally subsidized loans despite horrid drop out rates as students realize what a joke it is.

    --
    One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
  65. I don't get it. by DarthVain · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So exactly how does your car get its internet connection then? Or does it connect to other hot spots and then provide that signal to your devices? Or is this supposed to use one of the new wireless protocols like WiMAX or something? I didn't think those were all that operational yet? Will this be a subscription based service offered by Audi, like OnStar or something? Article seemed a bit light on details.

  66. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Typical problem of universities (I've also studied at a university myself): they teach how/why stuff works from a highly theoretical pov, not how it is used in practice. This gives a great basis for deeper understanding but most practical things are not learned in university but in real life.

    Practical stuff is learned on the job because one employer's method is different from another employer's method.

    Perhaps a good example would be a simple job of "programmer". If you want a code monkey to crank out code based on your designs and existing codebase, someone from college/university wouldn't fit. You'd want someone from a trade school who's basically trained in whatever lanugage you want to do it.

    The college/university student will handle codemonkey, but will take longer as they'll have to learn the language first (very rarely do they come out with more than one of C/C++, Java or .NET, while your trade school graduate can come out with a combination of C/C++, Java, .NET, PHP, Perl, Python, etc.).

    Perhaps a car analogy is more appropriate. If you want a mechanic to work on your car, you hire someone who's gone to a trade school and become a certified mechanic. However, if you want a new type of car, you have to hire automotive engineers who can design a car and understand all the physics and the like of cars to make a safe, fuel-efficient etc car. That automotive engineer probably can't rebuild an engine, but he'll know all the parts and what they do. Just like the mechanic can rebuild the engine, but won't have insight into why things are done the way they are (e.g., why the engine has so many sensors and is completely computer-controlled).

  67. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ehh... installing software isn't computer science. Granted I'd expect most people who have a computer science degree to be capable of installing software, but its sort of like complaining that a guy with a mechanical engineering degree is taking his car to a mechanic.

    I've been employed writing software for 10 years, and during that time my job has never required me to install windows on a computer, there are other people paid to do that.

  68. Damn! by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    Damn! Three months after I graduate!

  69. Grading on a curve makes this gambling. by neo · · Score: 1

    Gambling means that the event has a significant random factor. Any course where the prof grades on a curve would prove to create random shifts in results against a class not graded on that curve. This is not a game of skill.

  70. fifth amendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Students have to register, upload their schedule, and give the site access to official school records.So much for the fifth amendment.

  71. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Computer Science is now more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes.

    So how was it in the past?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  72. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by elfprince13 · · Score: 1

    eh, shoddy typing on my part. *no

  73. Sour grapes much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learning plays no factor in so-called modern education.

    Are you trying to infer that it's not modern, or that it's not education?

    See, if you'd gone to college you'd be able to convey your meaning more clearly.

    Hell, if I'd gone to college I'd know the differencce between "infer and "imply".

  74. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 1

    I spent my time and money buying real MIPS and SPARC hardware for running IRIX and Solaris, instead of spending it at University. That and reading documentation and watching MIT OCW and UCB Webcast.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  75. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by Lifyre · · Score: 1

    Was it Pheonix by any chance? That sounds right up their alley.

    However I made my point poorly. You can get a degree from many respectable brick and mortar schools online. Schools like Harvard, Stanford, Cornell, and Carnegie Mellon are just a few of the major schools that have online programs. In fact the vast majority of major colleges offer online education now.

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  76. You Can Bet On OTHERS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, nobody sees a problem with this? What's to stop me from betting against somebody in my class, then spending the semester making them tank, or explaining stuff wrong to them??? Wanna divide a B Class IP address into 50 subnets? No problem, just divide it by 50.............now hold on while I go make a few quick bets...

  77. Re:some people don't have the cash for degrees or by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    Yeah, good idea.
    The company I worked for was making 125 an hour for my time.
    The "highly compensated computer scientists" were fresh out of school doing Visual Basic. I was earning more than them AFTER the company took the huge cut of the money.