Like the title says I work for a company that earns its bread by selling ready made development teams. You can read more here: http://rolemodelsoftware.com/.
The fundamental reason I like Google and dislike Microsoft is that I like being a Google customer their stuff works well for me. Microsoft on the other hand frequently frustrates me.
You could say apples and oranges, Google only makes simple little search engines, while Microsoft makes operating systems and office suites. However it is possible for any company to release a product that they don't sufficiently understand no matter what the size. Microsoft simply bit off too much to maintain greatness, while Google has steadily build upon what they know how to do best. That is why I am excited about Microsoft's plan to build Singularity from scratch. Maybe they will start small and build on success instead of trying to be the world.
That's funny. I have the depressing thought that nothing researchers can do will change evolutionist thinking. All the facts that we both have that clearly point to the truth of the Bible including a young earth and worldwide flood are forcefitted into the evolutionary model. See http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/foss ils.asp for starters.
I strongly disagree. There is no way that the Bible is compatible with the teachings of evolution. Evolution requres millions/billions/trillions of years of death and suffering to whereas the Bible clearly states that death is a result of sin see Romans 5:12 (http://www.studylight.org/desk/?query=ro+5:12&tra nslation=nas&st=1&new=1&sr=1&l=en) . How can you have eons of death and suffering that God decrees "good" before Adam sinned? Sin is not good. Sin is evil. You can't accept the Bible and evolution. Science is not incompatible with the Bible see (http://www.answersingenesis.org/), but godless junk science is incompatible with the Bible.
gentic mutation. Even Richard Dawkins a leading proponent for evolution can't give a single example of a genitc mutation that adds information to the genome. The obvious conclusion is that we are degenerating from a state of created perfection. Exactly what the Bible describes in Genesis 1:1-11.
Re:Caught up with the speed, but still the ugliest
on
Java Faster Than C++?
·
· Score: 3, Informative
True, which is why the eclipse project (www.eclipse.org) created and maintains SWT. A portable native widget tookit. See http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-SWT-Design -1/SWT-Design-1.html for more info.
It gets downright expensive to try to talk with someone who can barely understand you, and who you barely understand. Misscommunication leads to rabbit trails, which last for at least 12 hours, because that is the time offset between here and india.
As a developer who designs things I find my own form of UML to be a helpful colaboration tool. It is nice to be able to draw boxes and lines on a white board to describe parts of a system. Generally I use UML where it makes sense... to help out with the picture is worth a thousand words scenario.
Slashdot Mirror
... or at least help http://opensails.org/
But everyone must be quick to hear, slow to speak and slow to anger;
a nslation=nas&st=1&new=1&sr=1&l=en
http://www.studylight.org/desk/?query=jas+1:19&tr
Like the title says I work for a company that earns its bread by selling ready made development teams. You can read more here: http://rolemodelsoftware.com/.
The fundamental reason I like Google and dislike Microsoft is that I like being a Google customer their stuff works well for me. Microsoft on the other hand frequently frustrates me.
You could say apples and oranges, Google only makes simple little search engines, while Microsoft makes operating systems and office suites. However it is possible for any company to release a product that they don't sufficiently understand no matter what the size. Microsoft simply bit off too much to maintain greatness, while Google has steadily build upon what they know how to do best. That is why I am excited about Microsoft's plan to build Singularity from scratch. Maybe they will start small and build on success instead of trying to be the world.
wakeup Neo!
That's funny. I have the depressing thought that nothing researchers can do will change evolutionist thinking. All the facts that we both have that clearly point to the truth of the Bible including a young earth and worldwide flood are forcefitted into the evolutionary model. See http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/foss ils.asp for starters.
I strongly disagree. There is no way that the Bible is compatible with the teachings of evolution. Evolution requres millions/billions/trillions of years of death and suffering to whereas the Bible clearly states that death is a result of sin see Romans 5:12 (http://www.studylight.org/desk/?query=ro+5:12&tra nslation=nas&st=1&new=1&sr=1&l=en) . How can you have eons of death and suffering that God decrees "good" before Adam sinned? Sin is not good. Sin is evil. You can't accept the Bible and evolution. Science is not incompatible with the Bible see (http://www.answersingenesis.org/), but godless junk science is incompatible with the Bible.
gentic mutation. Even Richard Dawkins a leading proponent for evolution can't give a single example of a genitc mutation that adds information to the genome. The obvious conclusion is that we are degenerating from a state of created perfection. Exactly what the Bible describes in Genesis 1:1-11.
True, which is why the eclipse project (www.eclipse.org) created and maintains SWT. A portable native widget tookit. See http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-SWT-Design -1/SWT-Design-1.html for more info.
It gets downright expensive to try to talk with someone who can barely understand you, and who you barely understand. Misscommunication leads to rabbit trails, which last for at least 12 hours, because that is the time offset between here and india.
As a developer who designs things I find my own form of UML to be a helpful colaboration tool. It is nice to be able to draw boxes and lines on a white board to describe parts of a system. Generally I use UML where it makes sense... to help out with the picture is worth a thousand words scenario.