They shouldn't be required to "share" any.
I don't think that one 'shares' when one pays taxes. That's appropriation - that's the nature of taxes.
I know many, many right wing people who share quite a lot, actually.
As opposed to the left wing nutjobs who strip mine entire countries for material to make their batteries. Oh yes, don't forget that the energy to make wind turbines is enormous.
No human activity leaves no footprint.
Let's see, in Obama's admin, we had Susan Rice lying to teh American public saying that Bengazhi was caused by a spontaneous outburst because of an American Youtube Video. We also had a lying AG who presided over smuggling thousands of guns to Mexico, many of which killed Mexican and US citizens. Now, let's talk about Mrs Clinton, whose foundation collected boatloads of money for Haiti relief, most of which was not used there and was "donated to charity" aka the Clinton Foundation. Oh yes, then there's the selling of American uranium to Russia. I could find a bunch more, but you get my point. It isn't one party, it isn't the other, it's BOTH.
Do you really believe it's any different under a D administration? I haven't seen much difference actually, but then again, I don't watch TV and get 24x7 propaganda.
This is the flip side of coercing folks like bakers to bake wedding cakes for people whom they do not agree with , such as gay folks.
Either you can have both or neither.
Sure, that makes sense. I agree. I just idly wonder if you live in ranch country, as I do, with a LOT of free range animals (aka "home of the range, where the deer and the antelope play" if they're fed antibiotics as much. I have no idea but want now to find out.
I would argue that the surveillance state is the responsibilityof both parties, as Obama and Clinton both heavily expanded it. Not saying the Right is good, they aren't, just that they're both equally bad.
I thought I was the only one who had thought of the things in this excellent thread. Um, no thanks on the electric vehicle to start with - well maybe in the future but not now.
An awful lot of folks who do this do have access to care and abuse antibiotics as well. AFAIK for western Europe only NORWAY doesn't have too much in the way of antibiotic resistant bacteria - I know UK has a lot and the NHS is free at point of care.
And, why do you want to give banks some percentage of every transaction you make? And why do you want your personal info of what you've purchased to be data mine-able?
If the left's idea is to embetter the poor through education, why have the left AND the right made education so much more difficult?
They shouldn't be required to "share" any. I don't think that one 'shares' when one pays taxes. That's appropriation - that's the nature of taxes. I know many, many right wing people who share quite a lot, actually.
OK Europe and Japan, then.
Except, of course, for Harry S Truman, JFK, LBJ, Jimmy Carter all of whom were Democrats and advanced military action more or less against the USSR.
Remember, the Europeans brought us WWI and WWII - conflagrations that killed, literally, tens of millions.
Interestingly enough, you can say exactly the same thing about the left.
As opposed to the left wing nutjobs who strip mine entire countries for material to make their batteries. Oh yes, don't forget that the energy to make wind turbines is enormous. No human activity leaves no footprint.
quit horsing around.
If you want to say 'hydrocarbon' business, I'd agree, as gas is a great feedstock for many things they do, too.
And just think, Kobol is a planet...
Yes. And for the medical industry, McKesson is already in that space, providing almost everything a hospital, ambulance, doctors office, etc. needs.
This. Medicare pioneered payment by DRG for CPT and it IS in the best interest of the hospital to be price efficient.
An awful lot of them live in NYC, not the best place for air.
Let's see, in Obama's admin, we had Susan Rice lying to teh American public saying that Bengazhi was caused by a spontaneous outburst because of an American Youtube Video. We also had a lying AG who presided over smuggling thousands of guns to Mexico, many of which killed Mexican and US citizens. Now, let's talk about Mrs Clinton, whose foundation collected boatloads of money for Haiti relief, most of which was not used there and was "donated to charity" aka the Clinton Foundation. Oh yes, then there's the selling of American uranium to Russia. I could find a bunch more, but you get my point. It isn't one party, it isn't the other, it's BOTH.
AC, you're confusing the situation with facts :) Well done.
Do you really believe it's any different under a D administration? I haven't seen much difference actually, but then again, I don't watch TV and get 24x7 propaganda.
This is the flip side of coercing folks like bakers to bake wedding cakes for people whom they do not agree with , such as gay folks. Either you can have both or neither.
Sure, that makes sense. I agree. I just idly wonder if you live in ranch country, as I do, with a LOT of free range animals (aka "home of the range, where the deer and the antelope play" if they're fed antibiotics as much. I have no idea but want now to find out.
I would argue that the surveillance state is the responsibilityof both parties, as Obama and Clinton both heavily expanded it. Not saying the Right is good, they aren't, just that they're both equally bad.
I thought I was the only one who had thought of the things in this excellent thread. Um, no thanks on the electric vehicle to start with - well maybe in the future but not now.
An awful lot of folks who do this do have access to care and abuse antibiotics as well. AFAIK for western Europe only NORWAY doesn't have too much in the way of antibiotic resistant bacteria - I know UK has a lot and the NHS is free at point of care.
To what animals is it fed? I'm suspecting poultry.
Not to mention most gun violence in the US is not committed by white men.
And, why do you want to give banks some percentage of every transaction you make? And why do you want your personal info of what you've purchased to be data mine-able?
Mostly it isn't the schools that make the loans.