Your concept of the money flow with spamers is wrong. Spamers get paid by compaines that think they will sell something to the end users. The result is most of the people who paid the spamers never make any sales at all.
Remember the YF-12 (aka SR71 Blackbird) also has an outer skin much like scales and are intended to move like scales to deal with expansion caused by a number of sources.
Because of the US$ difference and what is reasonable in most places in the world. That US$10 shareware program will buy the author 3 big macs but it will cost the buyer a weeks food in some parts of the world. That results in cracks and once the cracks are out, they flow all over the world.
If they manage to get documents from the compaines, they can then go to Baystar or Microsoft and ask for anything related to this document... and give them one. It make the evidence look much cleaner if your not just fishing with a dragnet and remember IBM isn't fighting this for the PR, they are fighting it to win. Taking another company to court and completely destroying them is tricky when your still being watched for anti-competitive practices so there will be hundreds of govt people in may countries looking at the result of this so everything they precent in court must be rock solid. It also means that IBM has no choice but to completely destroy SCO in court.
You say the machine was blady loaded with sendmail but not postfix. How do you know that? Did you use load average? If so, research what load average is saying. Its only a useful indicator for the enviroment where it was 1st intorduced which is machines that do lots of batch processing and many users loged in. Since users shouldn't be using shells on your mail sever, the stat makes no sense. All its saying is how many processes are in the runque that want to run or may run in the near future. It has nothing to do with total pending work on the machine. A program that forks to deal with more work will increase the loadaverage number while a program that keeps everything queued its self and sucks down 100% of the CPU won't.
I've found if you process the filters as you deal with the message, you can do it quickly but you have to be selective about what you filter aginst and keep it simple. The best way to filter aginst the virus of the week is as the data comes in since you can't bounce it anyway. In the past I even built a patch that simply looks for TVqQAAMAAAAEAAA in a line and blows away the connection. Its good for thousands of messages a minute too.
No it can't be read as that. Look at the reward page. Now tell me why hes so eager to exclused "programs outside of qmail?" The reason is simple, thats where many bugs have been found and while sendmail has many thousands of lines of code to work around them, qmail doesn't. Which is more secure? A program that works around a broken syscall in Linux or one that ignores it?
There are problems with the GPS system and an effect has been seen but remains unexplained and unpredictable (except by tweaking a very old and wrong theory). The GPS system updates the orbits of the sats daily and the effect is so weak that it would take years for the stats to drift more than a few meters from where they are predicted.
Dr Parkinson was a developer of the GPS system and worked on GPB in order to find out why the GPS sats orbits aren't as predicted. There has been changes to the GPB because of the anomalies found in the GPS system.
You are describing an effect as a cause which may or may not be true. Which is the cause and which is the effect. There are reasons why your going to measure c the same with both theorys if you understand them both. Thats the point I'm tring to make its just the in the problem space I deal with, the old junky theory gives better answers so just like using a flat map on a round world, it works so I'll use it till something better comes along.
You mean the theory that a magical force pulling two masses together violated other theories.
Assume there is constant stream of particles moving from every direction to every other direction but are so small that that they have a one in 10^$BIGNUM chance of hitting anything. They just happen to travel at c and their mass is small enough that they won't rip apart a molecule when it gets hit. Assume that they work just like standard Newtonian physics. Anything accelerating close to C would need an ever increasing energy to do so and the gravity==acceleration works out fine and at an atomic scale, things would end up being compressed. If you do this with a lump of cesium and treat it as a very tiny mechanical clock, this theory matches exactly what the GPS sat clocks do as they go around the earth. The deacceleration forces would also be in the same realm as the unexplained forces on the last Pioneers.
Newton invented the calculus because he wanted to do calculations with this theory (with bigger, slower particles) but it was beyond his ability.
At this point in time, I figure any crackpot gravity theory is just as wrong as whatever is being tought in Physics classes just as Alchemistry was wrong even though it was the basis for the dye industry and taught in the best schools in the world. All the current theorys are good enough for most work but then again I can get around using a map pretending the world is flat too but it doesn't mean its correct.
Limited? There are vast amounts of gold. In fact it seems to be virtually limitless. What limits the amount of gold mined is the cost of geting it out of the ground or ocean.
International agreements might have the full force of the law and in some cases trump local laws. The US Constitution claims the Pres does the dealing and if its approved by congress, its just as much law as anything else.
Expect Disney to start lobbying for another copyright extension in a couple of years to protect Mickey. And we know how US lawmakers love to listen to the corporation.
Then let them listen. Don't ask for reduced copyright terms, ask for longer copyright terms. Ask them for terms so long that Disney can be sued by the familys of the authors of the fairy tales that their cash cows are based on. Some times you just can't convince a represenitive to see your way so this is an option for the ones that think that extending it is a good idea.
Also if you ever get to talk to a US senator, ask them if they paid the royalties for singing "God Bless America" on the capitol steps and see what they say.
I wonder what they do with letters from people who are in their area but aren't on the Rolls? (note to Americans: you must be registerd to vote and show up or you get fined if your a citizen.) There is a large number of people living in Australia that aren't citizens.
200 years ago a strong man would create the most weatlh for him self by farming. An educated man would make more money farming than by doing just about anything else. The founders of the US wanted to encourage educated farmers to spend some of their time doing other things.
5 in the row and carry the 1.... Oh, they don't do this by hand and its an excuse to keep the noisey computer on 24x7 incase you win the prise. Single guys don't need an excuse to keep the computer(s) on 24x7
Trying to crack encryption with brute force is so pointless. I don't think it actually accomplishes anything useful. Today on a list someone was talking about AES and DES and pulled some info off some web page that said AES would take a trillion years to crack if you could crack 256 keys a second. This sort of thing shows that people can crack random obscure systems in a few months and most of the sanke-oil encryption is worthless.
How about decode every attachment and find out if you already have it? There is only a limited number of large things floating around the net and I'm guessing they already are cacheing most of them.
Quantom theorys are already out of the lab and in the real world. Old computer hardware is based on NAND and XOR gates but Toffoli and Fredkin gates are useful in the modern world and because you can revser them, once you start building DES/AES/RSA engines out of them, you can start to short circut some of the brute force attaces in very interesting ways. Combined with the real world ability to pre-compute and store data sets in the order of 3e12 bytes at a time, there are many crypt attacks now open to anyone with a good collection of hard drives.
The Borders metric is where you wanter into a Borders book store and count the shelf space allocated to each subject. Some subjects grow to several racks and then die out and others just sort of stay at their 1/4 rack for ever (like Ada, Fortran and C).
After all the founder of Nextel used to have what position at teh FCC?
It was a great move. Find a bit of frequency that had been allocated to old technology (the old mobile radio phones) and then buy up all the compaines that were losing busines to the more modern cell phones. By the time anyone had figured it out, he had bought out something like 75% of the frequency over the US.
Slashdot Mirror
This does work. It worked with Telstra.
Your concept of the money flow with spamers is wrong. Spamers get paid by compaines that think they will sell something to the end users. The result is most of the people who paid the spamers never make any sales at all.
Remember the YF-12 (aka SR71 Blackbird) also has an outer skin much like scales and are intended to move like scales to deal with expansion caused by a number of sources.
Because of the US$ difference and what is reasonable in most places in the world. That US$10 shareware program will buy the author 3 big macs but it will cost the buyer a weeks food in some parts of the world. That results in cracks and once the cracks are out, they flow all over the world.
If they manage to get documents from the compaines, they can then go to Baystar or Microsoft and ask for anything related to this document... and give them one. It make the evidence look much cleaner if your not just fishing with a dragnet and remember IBM isn't fighting this for the PR, they are fighting it to win. Taking another company to court and completely destroying them is tricky when your still being watched for anti-competitive practices so there will be hundreds of govt people in may countries looking at the result of this so everything they precent in court must be rock solid. It also means that IBM has no choice but to completely destroy SCO in court.
Years ago you had to put "patent pending" on something if you wanted to have any chance of protecting it once a patent was granted.
You say the machine was blady loaded with sendmail but not postfix. How do you know that? Did you use load average? If so, research what load average is saying. Its only a useful indicator for the enviroment where it was 1st intorduced which is machines that do lots of batch processing and many users loged in. Since users shouldn't be using shells on your mail sever, the stat makes no sense. All its saying is how many processes are in the runque that want to run or may run in the near future. It has nothing to do with total pending work on the machine. A program that forks to deal with more work will increase the loadaverage number while a program that keeps everything queued its self and sucks down 100% of the CPU won't.
I've found if you process the filters as you deal with the message, you can do it quickly but you have to be selective about what you filter aginst and keep it simple. The best way to filter aginst the virus of the week is as the data comes in since you can't bounce it anyway. In the past I even built a patch that simply looks for TVqQAAMAAAAEAAA in a line and blows away the connection. Its good for thousands of messages a minute too.
No it can't be read as that. Look at the reward page. Now tell me why hes so eager to exclused "programs outside of qmail?" The reason is simple, thats where many bugs have been found and while sendmail has many thousands of lines of code to work around them, qmail doesn't. Which is more secure? A program that works around a broken syscall in Linux or one that ignores it?
There are problems with the GPS system and an effect has been seen but remains unexplained and unpredictable (except by tweaking a very old and wrong theory). The GPS system updates the orbits of the sats daily and the effect is so weak that it would take years for the stats to drift more than a few meters from where they are predicted.
Dr Parkinson was a developer of the GPS system and worked on GPB in order to find out why the GPS sats orbits aren't as predicted. There has been changes to the GPB because of the anomalies found in the GPS system.
You are describing an effect as a cause which may or may not be true. Which is the cause and which is the effect. There are reasons why your going to measure c the same with both theorys if you understand them both. Thats the point I'm tring to make its just the in the problem space I deal with, the old junky theory gives better answers so just like using a flat map on a round world, it works so I'll use it till something better comes along.
newtonian gravity violated the speed of light.
You mean the theory that a magical force pulling two masses together violated other theories.
Assume there is constant stream of particles moving from every direction to every other direction but are so small that that they have a one in 10^$BIGNUM chance of hitting anything. They just happen to travel at c and their mass is small enough that they won't rip apart a molecule when it gets hit. Assume that they work just like standard Newtonian physics. Anything accelerating close to C would need an ever increasing energy to do so and the gravity==acceleration works out fine and at an atomic scale, things would end up being compressed. If you do this with a lump of cesium and treat it as a very tiny mechanical clock, this theory matches exactly what the GPS sat clocks do as they go around the earth. The deacceleration forces would also be in the same realm as the unexplained forces on the last Pioneers.
Newton invented the calculus because he wanted to do calculations with this theory (with bigger, slower particles) but it was beyond his ability.
At this point in time, I figure any crackpot gravity theory is just as wrong as whatever is being tought in Physics classes just as Alchemistry was wrong even though it was the basis for the dye industry and taught in the best schools in the world. All the current theorys are good enough for most work but then again I can get around using a map pretending the world is flat too but it doesn't mean its correct.
Limited? There are vast amounts of gold. In fact it seems to be virtually limitless. What limits the amount of gold mined is the cost of geting it out of the ground or ocean.
International agreements might have the full force of the law and in some cases trump local laws. The US Constitution claims the Pres does the dealing and if its approved by congress, its just as much law as anything else.
Expect Disney to start lobbying for another copyright extension in a couple of years to protect Mickey. And we know how US lawmakers love to listen to the corporation.
Then let them listen. Don't ask for reduced copyright terms, ask for longer copyright terms. Ask them for terms so long that Disney can be sued by the familys of the authors of the fairy tales that their cash cows are based on. Some times you just can't convince a represenitive to see your way so this is an option for the ones that think that extending it is a good idea.
Also if you ever get to talk to a US senator, ask them if they paid the royalties for singing "God Bless America" on the capitol steps and see what they say.
I wonder what they do with letters from people who are in their area but aren't on the Rolls? (note to Americans: you must be registerd to vote and show up or you get fined if your a citizen.) There is a large number of people living in Australia that aren't citizens.
200 years ago a strong man would create the most weatlh for him self by farming. An educated man would make more money farming than by doing just about anything else. The founders of the US wanted to encourage educated farmers to spend some of their time doing other things.
5 in the row and carry the 1....
Oh, they don't do this by hand and its an excuse to keep the noisey computer on 24x7 incase you win the prise. Single guys don't need an excuse to keep the computer(s) on 24x7
Trying to crack encryption with brute force is so pointless. I don't think it actually accomplishes anything useful.
Today on a list someone was talking about AES and DES and pulled some info off some web page that said AES would take a trillion years to crack if you could crack 256 keys a second. This sort of thing shows that people can crack random obscure systems in a few months and most of the sanke-oil encryption is worthless.
How about decode every attachment and find out if you already have it? There is only a limited number of large things floating around the net and I'm guessing they already are cacheing most of them.
One of the early open souce guys (google Henry/regex) claims he would go there on a one way trip and that was even reported in wired years ago.
like the duct tape that helped bring Apollo 13 back was mil spcec...
Some times you just deal with that you've got.
Quantom theorys are already out of the lab and in the real world. Old computer hardware is based on NAND and XOR gates but Toffoli and Fredkin gates are useful in the modern world and because you can revser them, once you start building DES/AES/RSA engines out of them, you can start to short circut some of the brute force attaces in very interesting ways. Combined with the real world ability to pre-compute and store data sets in the order of 3e12 bytes at a time, there are many crypt attacks now open to anyone with a good collection of hard drives.
According to the Borders metric, java is dead.
The Borders metric is where you wanter into a Borders book store and count the shelf space allocated to each subject. Some subjects grow to several racks and then die out and others just sort of stay at their 1/4 rack for ever (like Ada, Fortran and C).
What ever happend to the "index" feature on CDs?
After all the founder of Nextel used to have what position at teh FCC?
It was a great move. Find a bit of frequency that had been allocated to old technology (the old mobile radio phones) and then buy up all the compaines that were losing busines to the more modern cell phones. By the time anyone had figured it out, he had bought out something like 75% of the frequency over the US.