Here's the text, unslashdotted.
(what sucks is- I'm probibally going to get karma for this, though it dosen't require much effort or creativity. Alas, this is Slashdot =-P )
From owner-lomac-users Fri May 11 12:50:15 2001
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA02776
Fri, 11 May 2001 12:48:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: bucky.gw.tislabs.com: tfraser owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 13:12:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Fraser
X-Sender: tfraser@bucky.gw.tislabs.com
To: lomac-users@lists.tislabs.com
cc: tfraser@tislabs.com, rwatson@tislabs.com
Subject: LOMAC v1.1.0 on FTP site
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-lomac-users@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi!
LOMAC v1.1.0 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.tislabs.com/pub/lomac/lomac-v1.1.0.tar.g z
Changes in LOMAC v1.1.0 since the last release (v1.0.5):
o Restructured argument handling to avoid time-of-check/time-of-use
errors.
o Added mediation on the addition and removal of directory entries.
o Changed all -EPERM ("operation not permitted") return values to
the proper value: -EACCES ("permission denied").
Summary of Changes in LOMAC v1.1.0 since the v1.0.0 release:
The 1.1.0 release improves LOMAC's protective functionality and makes
LOMAC easier to use. The 1.1.0 release features restructured system
call argument handling to addresses the time-of-check/time-of-use
problems present in the 1.0 release, and provides new mediation on
directory modification operations. With the 1.1.0 release, LOMAC's
default configuration allows the mounting of remote NFS filesystems
and the use of SSH for remote administration.
- Tim
Read the post. He didn't even comment on the new series. All Taco did was post the original comment that was sent to HIM.
Let's not Bash Taco unless there's some reason behind it? After all, he DID create slashdot, and IS running it. You don't like it, go somewhere else.
EOF
I like the idea that slashdot was compromised.
I'm sure it took skill and extreme ability to do so. Tack on the fact that They didn't rm -rf or install any trojans (i'm assuming) or didn't post a 4 page summary of everything that is morally wrong about slashdot, or even worse, an ASCII picture of natilie portman, shows they are intelligent. Good work. I look forward to seeing how you got in, and for having the guts not to do anything stupid. Thank you.
From what i understand, a Laser etched chip would be way to small for a home user to modify. but, what about those in university labs or other semi-commonly accessable Equipment.
okay, i just timed it down to the second. Windows 2000 took 2 min and 14.5 seconds to boot from video card init to login prompt.
Linux took 1 min and 22.7 seconds from init to prompt. I really don't know why windows takes so long to load.. oh well, since i'm in linux most (99.9%) of the time anyways, its not too much of a problem. but i do wonder why.. i may look under the hood and tweak it a bit.;-}
I don't know about linux taking longer then windows. Usually it takes less then a miniute and a half for my computer to go through the bios, pause for 5 seconds while lilo gives a chance to choose windows or linux, then load the kernel, modules, start services, etc. to a login prompt (Redhat 6.2).
It's much faster then the 5 mins it takes for windows (2000 Professional)
I have an AMD k6-2 350 with 64M RAM. not bad, IMHO.
b) its "i wonder how that would run on a Beowulf cluster
its Natilie Portman, naked and petrified
its GPL'ed Open Sourced.
Seriously though, If you are going to criticise "sheep" mentality or gripe about how the use of certian buzzwords are used, do it right, don't use a combination of slashdot troll posts and 2600 (no offense you 2600'ers out there;-} ) propaganda to make yourself sound like a total moron.
A Lawsuit wouldn't be the way to go, if the changes are the ones management wants to see, then they shoulldn't have too much of a problem, if they do, you might have to get out that old printer and start mailing those old high-school style persuasive letters.. =-}
While reading some form of Monty Python autobiography, I noticed it contained several references to you. How do you think you influenced or were influenced by the Monty Python cast and crew. Overall what was your relationship with them?
yes, but you have just as much a risk, even today of a "bioterrorist" getting ahold of or creating a biological agent, say, eubola or some other deadly disease and releasing it in the subway of new york. same principal..
okay, mods need to moderate this up. i mean, come on, this was an intelligantly written opposing viewpoint, and while it may not align with the view of the vocal majority, it still has its points, and appears to be written in seriousness, instead of being written to draw flaim. THIS is what slashdot was about, education, debate. not "i'm moderating you down because you don't agree with me or i don't like your viewpoint. " While i think this poster is a bit uneducated or misinformed, he still deserves to have his (or her, sorry for the bias;-} ) view at the level of at LEAST 1, so that the anti-toll people who read at a 1+ threshold can see the article.
Re:How would they know you had money?
on
Apocalypse Not
·
· Score: 1
People keep personal records. as long as they have authentic bank records, they should be able to track their balance, back a month at least. I personally keep a record of every transaction i make.
No matter what the group, it can be a solitary group for years, but when it gets noticed, there will be many people who will jump on the bandwagon, this is what happened to the linux community. there will be the group yelling "I am a Linux User, Hear me ROAR! BRING DOWN M$", but then their will be the other, smaller group of people who spend hours coding, devloping and working behind the scenes. these are the true linux people. sort of the difference between "script kiddies" and "hackers" and the ever elusive (but relevant to this story) "true elite hackers" who write/discover/work-untill-their-fingers-bleed on the stuff that the script kiddies abuse, and the hackers use. That will never change. People want to stand on the shoulders of the dedicated greats who formed the object of their ego.
Would one ISP filtering content and becoming liable for content affect ALL ISPs? and also, what would occur in liability if they could prove that "were making acceptable effort" content?
Slashdot Mirror
Here's the text, unslashdotted. (what sucks is- I'm probibally going to get karma for this, though it dosen't require much effort or creativity. Alas, this is Slashdot =-P ) From owner-lomac-users Fri May 11 12:50:15 2001 Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA02776 Fri, 11 May 2001 12:48:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: bucky.gw.tislabs.com: tfraser owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 13:12:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Fraser X-Sender: tfraser@bucky.gw.tislabs.com To: lomac-users@lists.tislabs.com cc: tfraser@tislabs.com, rwatson@tislabs.com Subject: LOMAC v1.1.0 on FTP site Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-lomac-users@lists.tislabs.com Precedence: bulk Hi! LOMAC v1.1.0 is now available for download at: ftp://ftp.tislabs.com/pub/lomac/lomac-v1.1.0.tar.g z
Changes in LOMAC v1.1.0 since the last release (v1.0.5):
o Restructured argument handling to avoid time-of-check/time-of-use
errors.
o Added mediation on the addition and removal of directory entries.
o Changed all -EPERM ("operation not permitted") return values to
the proper value: -EACCES ("permission denied").
Summary of Changes in LOMAC v1.1.0 since the v1.0.0 release:
The 1.1.0 release improves LOMAC's protective functionality and makes
LOMAC easier to use. The 1.1.0 release features restructured system
call argument handling to addresses the time-of-check/time-of-use
problems present in the 1.0 release, and provides new mediation on
directory modification operations. With the 1.1.0 release, LOMAC's
default configuration allows the mounting of remote NFS filesystems
and the use of SSH for remote administration.
- Tim
Read the post. He didn't even comment on the new series. All Taco did was post the original comment that was sent to HIM. Let's not Bash Taco unless there's some reason behind it? After all, he DID create slashdot, and IS running it. You don't like it, go somewhere else. EOF
Too Bad Detroit has Net access =-{
http://www.rinkworks.com/dialect/dialectp.cgi?dial ect=hckr&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.microsoft.com%2Finde x.html
Ms seems to have left a loophole (minor) if they did this intentionally. =-D
I'd Give Orwell's "Animal Farm" A good reading. I think you'd like it.
It throughly illustrates What happens when one power is removed in favor of a better power, that ultimately ends up exactly like the old dictatorship.
I like the idea that slashdot was compromised. I'm sure it took skill and extreme ability to do so. Tack on the fact that They didn't rm -rf or install any trojans (i'm assuming) or didn't post a 4 page summary of everything that is morally wrong about slashdot, or even worse, an ASCII picture of natilie portman, shows they are intelligent. Good work. I look forward to seeing how you got in, and for having the guts not to do anything stupid. Thank you.
From what i understand, a Laser etched chip would be way to small for a home user to modify. but, what about those in university labs or other semi-commonly accessable Equipment.
okay, i just timed it down to the second. Windows 2000 took 2 min and 14.5 seconds to boot from video card init to login prompt.
;-}
Linux took 1 min and 22.7 seconds from init to prompt.
I really don't know why windows takes so long to load.. oh well, since i'm in linux most (99.9%) of the time anyways, its not too much of a problem. but i do wonder why.. i may look under the hood and tweak it a bit.
I don't know about linux taking longer then windows. Usually it takes less then a miniute and a half for my computer to go through the bios, pause for 5 seconds while lilo gives a chance to choose windows or linux, then load the kernel, modules, start services, etc. to a login prompt (Redhat 6.2).
It's much faster then the 5 mins it takes for windows (2000 Professional)
I have an AMD k6-2 350 with 64M RAM. not bad, IMHO.
Nope. not enough.
Seriously though, If you are going to criticise "sheep" mentality or gripe about how the use of certian buzzwords are used, do it right, don't use a combination of slashdot troll posts and 2600 (no offense you 2600'ers out there ;-} ) propaganda to make yourself sound like a total moron.
A Lawsuit wouldn't be the way to go, if the changes are the ones management wants to see, then they shoulldn't have too much of a problem, if they do, you might have to get out that old printer and start mailing those old high-school style persuasive letters.. =-}
While reading some form of Monty Python autobiography, I noticed it contained several references to you. How do you think you influenced or were influenced by the Monty Python cast and crew. Overall what was your relationship with them?
Hemos-
So, if you personally had to choose, what would be your favorite game overall?
~~Delphinios~~
yes, but you have just as much a risk, even today of a "bioterrorist" getting ahold of or creating a biological agent, say, eubola or some other deadly disease and releasing it in the subway of new york. same principal..
okay, mods need to moderate this up. i mean, come on, this was an intelligantly written opposing viewpoint, and while it may not align with the view of the vocal majority, it still has its points, and appears to be written in seriousness, instead of being written to draw flaim. THIS is what slashdot was about, education, debate. not "i'm moderating you down because you don't agree with me or i don't like your viewpoint. " While i think this poster is a bit uneducated or misinformed, he still deserves to have his (or her, sorry for the bias ;-} ) view at the level of at LEAST 1, so that the anti-toll people who read at a 1+ threshold can see the article.
Sounds good. but do you really enjoy inflation that much?
Think about it a sec. " A minimum of capital and organisation is necessary to move offshore. "
that means the companies would increse prices to make up for the profit losses. Plus you add in Import and shipping taxes, and you see the prices of goods increse consideribally. For a good example, think about what would happen to thge prices if one of the popular companies,, say Coca-Cola© moved to Denmark, or France.
Warning: do not enter if you have a weak stomach
Spam. Think about it.
People keep personal records. as long as they have authentic bank records, they should be able to track their balance, back a month at least. I personally keep a record of every transaction i make.
You know, You'd thnk a 'reputable' science magazine would be more accurate.
www.sciencedaily.com reports: Geomagnetic Storms May Kick Off The New Millennium
No matter what the group, it can be a solitary group for years, but when it gets noticed, there will be many people who will jump on the bandwagon, this is what happened to the linux community. there will be the group yelling "I am a Linux User, Hear me ROAR! BRING DOWN M$", but then their will be the other, smaller group of people who spend hours coding, devloping and working behind the scenes. these are the true linux people. sort of the difference between "script kiddies" and "hackers" and the ever elusive (but relevant to this story) "true elite hackers" who write/discover/work-untill-their-fingers-bleed on the stuff that the script kiddies abuse, and the hackers use. That will never change. People want to stand on the shoulders of the dedicated greats who formed the object of their ego.
Would one ISP filtering content and becoming liable for content affect ALL ISPs? and also, what would occur in liability if they could prove that "were making acceptable effort" content?
"Everybody don't vote, and maybe we'll have anarchy, just like the web"
If nobody speaks, except a small minority, then only the small minority's voice will be be heard, instead of the majority.
And you can't stop everyone from voting. Therefore, get more people to vote, not less. the majority will be heard better.
For Legs Good! Two Legs BAAAD!
For Legs Goood! Two Legs BAAAAD!
For Legs Gooood! Two Legs BAAAAAD!
For Legs Good! Two Legs BAAAD! For Legs Goood! Two Legs BAAAAD! For Legs Gooood! Two Legs BAAAAAD!