The Psion5 is a start, but it's too slow and has too little memory IMHO (otherwise perfect).
Mini-x and Bogl sounds interesting. Any links?
I too have been thinking about the Jupiter (Phillips' StrongARM-based WinCE entry), but am worried that sufficiently detailed HW information wont be available and overriding the WinCE might prove impossible.
Been there, done that. C'mon. Using several channels to compound the network bandwidth has been available for Linux for several years now. I'd be surprised if it's not part of the standard kernel. The name of this technology escapes me presently, but should be documented in one of the net-howto's.
I have an ~100GB archive (50 DATs) and I'd love to find an alternative to my DAT robot. The problems with the DAT are:
1) Slow (~ 300KB/s average in my case) 2) Linear (multi minutes seek time) 3) Unrealiable (I haven't lost data yet, but often experience wierd behavoirs)
HOWEVER, I typically pay ~$3 par tape which translate to $1.5/GB. I have yet to find anything to beat that.
I really hope it flies, but I'm worried what loosing the Corel brandname might do to the NetWinder and how HCC is going to cooperate with our community.
Anyone with a little knowledge about crypto knows that algoritms need to stand the test of time before they can be taken seriously. And when did we start to take our news from the mainstream press? Slashdot is getting worse every day.
What's the big deal about cases? They whole point for me is to hide the technology. All this showing off your big PC look way too much like truck pulling to me. I want the effect, not the technology. Call me back when they fitted a battery-driven LCD panel puter w/o keyboard into a frame you can hang up on you wall without being ashamed.
Slashdot Mirror
Mini-x and Bogl sounds interesting. Any links?
I too have been thinking about the Jupiter (Phillips' StrongARM-based WinCE entry), but am worried that sufficiently detailed HW information wont be available and overriding the WinCE might prove impossible.
Been there, done that. C'mon. Using several channels to compound the network bandwidth has been available for Linux for several years now. I'd be surprised if it's not part of the standard kernel. The name of this technology escapes me presently, but should be documented in one of the net-howto's.
I have an ~100GB archive (50 DATs) and I'd
love to find an alternative to my DAT robot.
The problems with the DAT are:
1) Slow (~ 300KB/s average in my case)
2) Linear (multi minutes seek time)
3) Unrealiable (I haven't lost data yet, but
often experience wierd behavoirs)
HOWEVER, I typically pay ~$3 par tape which
translate to $1.5/GB. I have yet to find anything
to beat that.
Peter says:
Well it has. It's been way too much of a pleasure.
Well, it's probably a language thing, but could
anybody explain what he could possible mean by
that?
I really hope it flies, but I'm worried what
loosing the Corel brandname might do to the
NetWinder and how HCC is going to cooperate
with our community.
Anyone with a little knowledge about crypto
knows that algoritms need to stand the test
of time before they can be taken seriously.
And when did we start to take our news from
the mainstream press? Slashdot is getting
worse every day.
.. or does it actually work?
Geek is ok, but go with style.
Take a look at the total S/H (4 + 11) for
non-US residens in the case of just one T-shirt.
$30 for a T-shirt - NO WAY!
Now, what's wrong with playing with matches? :-)
I just discovered the writing, but it took me
three hours to get back to life. Great stuff.