Even though most politicians don't talk this way, they rely on the untrammeled power of calitalism for the economic dynamism to support a social safety net to take the rough edges off it.
Socialism involves nominal private ownership but heavy government control. Obamacare is socialism. Government health care, where you can still buy your own superior care is socialism. Single payer that outlaws that and forces you to only use government is communist.
Remember the definition of satire, here in a quaintly archaic, or angrily triggering, old version: poking fun at Man's institutions for the purpose of improving them.
Pwned, yes. But don't worry, the only people who know the web sites and pages you visit are are the advertising giants of Google, Amazon, facebook. And Microsoft monitors you even if you use Chrome, and wants you eventually subscribe to Windows as a cloud thing so it can monitor you directly, and every government on the planet, shrimp salad, shrimp and potatoes, shrimp burger, shrimp sandwich. That's about it.
Nobody can compete with the first mover in a single global market that naturally produces monopolies. It is very much a winner takes all industry. The EU is still being friendly. They could have gone the way of China and India to break the US hold on the internet. But they did not. Not yet anyway. They may if the balkanization of the internet continues and everyone else is trying to grab a piece of it.
Those guys "broke the hold" for no respectable reasons. They want to contain their populations at whim.
I see the usual disasterbators with US derangement syndrome and trolls are out in full force today. How much are you paid to front this silly post?
Here in Europe we'd replace Google almost instantly with our own technologies and/or we'd buy it from China.
We would be very happy if Google would leave our market. It would bring a lot of employment, it would give us back our own advertising market, it would give us back our privacy and politicians would regain control over their local propaganda channels and media.
Yes, yes please Google. Leave.
Oh, Europeans prefer China search engines, instead?
What is this in terms of Seti@Home or some other thing? Every couple of years I can do everything I've done before over a decade and a half in a few weeks, making all that effort pointless. I suppose nobody should run any number crunching until the year 2525 and get everything from now until then done by February 2525.
The particles are moved from additional energy, is this the mass? Are they treating the transfer of this from particle to particle as some kind of virtual particle?
Cash allows you to avoid government scrutiny. As with much of the Constitution, the real reason of that is to stop people in power from scouring the activities of their political opponents, though it will be portrayed as trying to hide illegality.
"If you have nothing to hide, what are you afraid of?" Exactly that.
By the 1970s, "leftists" had captured academia and were using it as a money-powered think tank to churn out talking points, so the right created their own think tanks to help pay people to do the opposite.
This stupid game of blinders that "your side is biased but not mine!" has been going on for a lot longer.
There is something to be said for investigating the desire to use AGW as levarage for massive government control of the economy, when class warfare no longer works at the polls
I wish there was further investigation into this aspect, but it is lost in all the hoopla regardless of veracity.
Bias isn't in the facts per se but the choice of stories to drumbeat on, day after day, year after year, to get people concerned to build a solid coalition for "your side".
Slashdot Mirror
When it natiinalizes the stuff, it is no longer capitalism. Capitalism is free people doing their thing.
If what you describe is capitalism, then so is a thief fencing his goods to a shady pawn broker.
Even though most politicians don't talk this way, they rely on the untrammeled power of calitalism for the economic dynamism to support a social safety net to take the rough edges off it.
Socialism involves nominal private ownership but heavy government control. Obamacare is socialism. Government health care, where you can still buy your own superior care is socialism. Single payer that outlaws that and forces you to only use government is communist.
Remember the definition of satire, here in a quaintly archaic, or angrily triggering, old version: poking fun at Man's institutions for the purpose of improving them.
Pwned, yes. But don't worry, the only people who know the web sites and pages you visit are are the advertising giants of Google, Amazon, facebook. And Microsoft monitors you even if you use Chrome, and wants you eventually subscribe to Windows as a cloud thing so it can monitor you directly, and every government on the planet, shrimp salad, shrimp and potatoes, shrimp burger, shrimp sandwich. That's about it.
"It's ok. Just download it and unzip it and don't run it if it's .exe!"
His friend moused to the DL button. The other guy made a face like Richie's little brother waiting to see if Kirk would drink the tranya.
Thor takes a back seat to no Marvel character.
To paraphrase Deb from Dexter: "Holy freakin' fudge! What does this have to do with politics?"
Nobody can compete with the first mover in a single global market that naturally produces monopolies. It is very much a winner takes all industry.
The EU is still being friendly. They could have gone the way of China and India to break the US hold on the internet. But they did not. Not yet anyway. They may if the balkanization of the internet continues and everyone else is trying to grab a piece of it.
Those guys "broke the hold" for no respectable reasons. They want to contain their populations at whim.
I see the usual disasterbators with US derangement syndrome and trolls are out in full force today. How much are you paid to front this silly post?
Here in Europe we'd replace Google almost instantly with our own technologies and/or we'd buy it from China.
We would be very happy if Google would leave our market. It would bring a lot of employment, it would give us back our own advertising market, it would give us back our privacy and politicians would regain control over their local propaganda channels and media.
Yes, yes please Google. Leave.
Oh, Europeans prefer China search engines, instead?
And running a sim would just asymptotically approach the actual average distance. But doing the math to calculate that value is much cooler.
That and relativistic precession.
What is this in terms of Seti@Home or some other thing? Every couple of years I can do everything I've done before over a decade and a half in a few weeks, making all that effort pointless. I suppose nobody should run any number crunching until the year 2525 and get everything from now until then done by February 2525.
Here it is exceedingly compressed to 20 or so bytes: "pi to 33 trillion digits".
I'll chop the head off if you clean it.
Sucks your Yoda lingo does.
It's also short for dinkus, which greatly preceded it.
Hope springs eternal for lawyers drooling over potential class action lawsuits.
One of those, and your law firm's principals are liquid, as Gordon Gecko might say.
The particles are moved from additional energy, is this the mass? Are they treating the transfer of this from particle to particle as some kind of virtual particle?
They also lie they cannot update the lenses in your current $400 frames even though the machines can run the inside of the frame for sizing.
Cash allows you to avoid government scrutiny. As with much of the Constitution, the real reason of that is to stop people in power from scouring the activities of their political opponents, though it will be portrayed as trying to hide illegality.
"If you have nothing to hide, what are you afraid of?" Exactly that.
By the 1970s, "leftists" had captured academia and were using it as a money-powered think tank to churn out talking points, so the right created their own think tanks to help pay people to do the opposite.
This stupid game of blinders that "your side is biased but not mine!" has been going on for a lot longer.
There is something to be said for investigating the desire to use AGW as levarage for massive government control of the economy, when class warfare no longer works at the polls
I wish there was further investigation into this aspect, but it is lost in all the hoopla regardless of veracity.
Bias isn't in the facts per se but the choice of stories to drumbeat on, day after day, year after year, to get people concerned to build a solid coalition for "your side".
As with a number of memes, it was used against Republicans first, then they adopt it and use it against their attackers.
It is part of a larger ongoing lament by the left that "Republicans are learning to weaponize all our best tricks against them...against us!"
Anonymity on the Internet is useful to hide from corrupt governments...but they can use anonymity too.