Slashdot Mirror


USA Today Tech Columnist: Millennials Will Live To See a Cashless World (usatoday.com)

"I haven't had a nickel, dime, quarter or penny in my pocket for two years," writes USA Today tech columnist Jefferson Graham, adding "Why bother? We're now living in what's quickly becoming a cashless society, where credit cards or electronic payments on your phone rule."

His column is addressed to the mayor of Philadelphia, who this week signed a bill that bans cashless stores. Mr. Mayor. It's happening all over the world, and not just from Amazon. We are going cashless. Maybe not in your lifetime, but certainly for millennials. Banks and credit card companies want this to curb the costs of handling green. Selected merchants are into it now... USA Today's Charisse Jones discovered that cash purchases were down to 30 percent of all retail transactions as of last year compared to 40 percent in 2012. Millennials, she noted here this week, are saying no to cash, with 21 percent of those 23- to 34 years old saying that most of their transactions were in cash in 2016....

Mobile pay is still a sliver of overall retail sales, but it's definitely on the rise. Target, a long holdout, just added Apple Pay to one of its options, following in the footsteps of Best Buy, CVS, Costco and other retail giants who now accept payment via iPhone. The big, lone holdout right now is Walmart, the No. 1 retailer. It does have its own mobile pay app, that links bank payments to QR codes. And Mr. Mayor, good news for you. Walmart still accepts cash, too.

But for how long?

454 comments

  1. prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unlike this crappy columnist I am a millennial with a good paying job with no debt and money in my pocket.

    I go out of my way to use cash and avoid credit cards.

    The day we have a cashless society is the day the cloud atlas economy takes hold. (i.e you are required to spend a certain amount of money a week on consumption and probably negative interest rates and financial fees as punishment if you don't)

    That or the world will migrate to Bitcoin I suppose...

    1. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You MUST ADOPT
      Fully Distributed P2P Transaction Mineable Privacy Cryptocurrencies

      People, please, wake the fuck up.
      Cypherpunks and Voluntaryists are trying to help you.
      It's time you listen to them!

    2. Re: prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you have debit/interac in the US?

    3. Re:prefer cash by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      I also have a good paying job, no debt, but I haven't used cash in probably a year. Haven't used credit cards either. Instead I mostly use contactless payments. It's quick and easy and I don't need to carry a bulky wallet.

    4. Re:prefer cash by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am a millennial with a good paying job with no debt and money in my pocket.
      I go out of my way to use cash and avoid credit cards.

      I'm a little older, but also debt-free and plenty of income, savings and investments. I use cash *and* credit cards, which aren't a problem if (a) they're no-fee and (b) you pay them off completely every month. Having and using them responsibly also helps your credit score -- which helps me as even my mortgage is paid off -- and you get a one-month float on your money... There's really no reason to avoid them unless you're irresponsible or stupid.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    5. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't agree more. All that cashless stuff (as it is conceived now) is just a vector for digital parasites leeching off our life lines.

      The day a truly anonymous, transparent and vendor-independent cashless system appears will be the day I might ditch cash.

      Currently, the trend seems to point in the opposite direction: given that, they'll pry the cash out of my dead, cold fingers.

    6. Re:prefer cash by sfcat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I also have a good paying job, no debt, but I haven't used cash in probably a year. Haven't used credit cards either. Instead I mostly use contactless payments. It's quick and easy and I don't need to carry a bulky wallet.

      On behalf of big brother, thank you for your continuing donation of financial information that we sell to pay for our hookers and blow. That yummy financial info is worth so much more than your fb likes that seem to get you millennial types so worked up...

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    7. Re:prefer cash by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      That yummy financial info is worth so much more

      Really ? What's so interesting about me buying some groceries, gasoline, or a new faucet for the bathroom ?

    8. Re:prefer cash by sfcat · · Score: 1

      That yummy financial info is worth so much more

      Really ? What's so interesting about me buying some groceries, gasoline, or a new faucet for the bathroom ?

      Seriously? Your FB posting history across all time is worth maybe $6 (according to FB). Your entire financial history is worth hundreds. Either you are a troll or a fool. What you post is mainly meaningless, being able to predict it is worth even less...being able to predict what you buy and why however, that's pure gold.

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    9. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bare fact that they're willing to pay for it should tell you that it is worth something to someone.

      So yes, really (you sucker, you).

      What exactly? Why, they manage to make money out of it somehow. You know what Cambridge Analytica did. Why shouldn't that work just the same for groceries? Those payment records now have your name on it, so they also show you were there at that point in time. If you think that information is not strictly necessary for all those places (and their payment processors, and the various other middle men involved in electronic payments) to keep for as long as the taxman requires them to (and maybe a little longer), then your recourse is to pay cash.

      If too many of you stop paying cash, then sooner or later the option goes away, and we all lose that choice.

    10. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're trying to help someone alright. (It's themselves).

    11. Re:prefer cash by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      being able to predict what you buy and why however, that's pure gold.

      How ? Suppose you see me buying groceries 5 times a week, giving you the name of the store and the total amount that I spent. How do you propose to monetize that ? And how will that cause me harm ?

    12. Re: prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Write to bank to ask which 3rd party organisations they share your data with.
      2. Write to bank instructing them to immediately halt all sharing of your data with these organisations as is your legal right under Article 18 of the EU GDPR. https://gdpr-info.eu/art-18-gdpr/
      3. Also instruct been to instruct these 3rd party organisations to erase all records of the data that belongs to you as is your legal right under Article 17. https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/
      4. Thank God that you don't live in a shithole like the USA.

    13. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't, cryptocurrency doesn't work like Fiat tries to fuck you with interest and money printing and theft of taxes.
      Yes, early creators and adopters and miners all have some coin. That doesn't bother me because they're not against me. Voluntaryists have nothing to gain from Voluntaryism except for freedom. In fact, we all support each other. I'm ok with that.
      They saw the value in systems we weren't even able to think of.
      Now that we can see what they see, it's out into the marketplace of ideas, it's quite amazing.

    14. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      1) More detailed purchase histories are rare but do exist and you can bet many powerful corps would love to expand upon that. Your store-linked cards do this, tiing you to every single item you spend there.

      2) Your subversive and effective fliers you handed out at a protest.. (or perhaps your kid). have your printer's UID hidden on them, it was done in the 90s to track down fake money but naturally it expanded so an FBI agent can just scan your print outs and figure out who you are. how? you bought it with a generic card! Well, the price of the item can be estimated and used to narrow down the search... aside from product registrations, store repair plans,... besides, it's not like some printers don't have a serial number in the barcode that could be scanned in... and your generic card has your name connected to it which a bigger store does get access to. This is just a tiny bit of what is involved on this one.

      3) embarrassment... buy stuff at a sex shop? buy something innocent at a biz that was later caught sex trafficing? Plan on having a job with real power? Something of use to a government in some way? Inflential on social media? upset the wrong person who has the right connections? privatized spy services are just beginning to get going. your ex's private detective may gain access to such things in the future. accusations can get you fired.

      4) private profiling. government is only 1 risk. you can't get a job and you just don't know why.... but 3rd party HR services keep telling places to not hire you. you won't know why; they won't disclose it, the employer will not even know-- that is part of the reason they hire a 3rd party. your purchase history will just be part of it.
      Walmart got into trouble for running credit checks on people to decide if they should hire--- they wanted people with bad credit because they can abuse them more!

      5) META DATA. you buy X every X at this kind of store. you likely have Y health condition. raise insurance! or don't hire them... lay them off. you might be cheating because why do you buy in these places at these times? The REAL money is in providing guesses from interpretation of the meta data. This information YOU DO NOT OWN and no privacy measures apply because their profile of you is not your property. again, potential for government abuse is HUGE -- your self-centered life might not matter-- but already with no tech--the FBI went after MLK spying on him and trying to even get him to kill himself. your influential leaders can be taken down; hell, you will help them do it by judging others so easily joining the MOB that social media is.

      6) Stupid AI profiling. your vague pattern is the same as a pedophile 60%. anybody seeing the profile will act differently to you. We all see stupid Netflix and amazon suggestions based on our profile. Imagine those being actually used for stuff...

    15. Re:prefer cash by skegg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, but the store knows the individual items that you purchased, along with your credit card.

      You do know there's an entire industry devoted to this data? Purchased & formatted neatly by data brokers and then sold for a handsome profit.

      >> And how will that cause me harm ?

      At the moment I suspect it won't. But I don't know what will happen in 10 years.
      Will you be refused health insurance because you bought too many Twinkies, and not enough greens?
      Drank too much Coke? Were making purchases at 11pm instead of being in bed?

      Personally, it's for the potential abuses that I CAN'T think of that I prefer cash.

    16. Re: prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm just greedy, so extracting more cash from you is valuable, but the political hacks know that information is very valuable for securing your vote. Yes, personalized campaigning is getting automated.

    17. Re: prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have and you can use debit cards but often they incur a transaction fee. If I'm at the grocer and use my debit card, it can cost $0.50 - $2.00 to use my card at a POS (not an ATM). My local Chinese restaurant passes a $3 fee onto me.

      Those are still scrip (cashless) in the sense that it's simply a piece of plastic with account information on it acting as a substitute for legal tender (by using a third party either paying or vouching to pay for the transaction).

      In the corporate states of America, we already accept company scrip for many sorts of transactions or as incentives. If we keep heading this direction, as companies continue to inevitably monopolize markets, well be in situations like the old coal industry with coal scrip through various loopholes in our increasingly more privatized society.

    18. Re:prefer cash by someoneOtherThanMe · · Score: 1

      For example, if they can forecast how much they can raise grocery prices before a significant number of customers will go elsewhere, that's pure gold for them, and minor harm to you. For stuff with individual pricing (hotel rooms, plane tickets...), forecasting how much you individually are willing to pay is a bit more gold for them, and much more harm to you.

    19. Re:prefer cash by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Will you be refused health insurance because you bought too many Twinkies, and not enough greens?

      The solution is not allowing insurance companies to refuse insurance based on purchases.

      And if you don't think that the laws will save you, you will have to worry about cameras in the store and streets following your exact movements and actions. Using cash won't save you.

    20. Re:prefer cash by Drethon · · Score: 1

      I'll worry about that when we achieve a full digital office that has been predicted for a long time. As it is, I still see plenty of notebooks at meetings and documents printed out for reviews with a pen. Even in places that have almost eliminated paper, physical white boards are still a major thing that hasn't been replaced by a digital version.

      I see physical money as the same. There are certain conveniences that digital versions cannot yet overcome without a notable expense (I would love tablet and digital whiteboard replacements for physical devices, and so would security when they put notes on our whiteboard to not leave potential export information on a whiteboard, but the cost and reliability of a digital version make this impractical. It is hard enough to get the company to even get me a good enough laptop to do my job).

    21. Re:prefer cash by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      4) private profiling. government is only 1 risk. you can't get a job and you just don't know why.... but 3rd party HR services keep telling places to not hire you. you won't know why; they won't disclose it, the employer will not even know-- that is part of the reason they hire a 3rd party. your purchase history will just be part of it. Walmart got into trouble for running credit checks on people to decide if they should hire--- they wanted people with bad credit because they can abuse them more!

      5) META DATA. you buy X every X at this kind of store. you likely have Y health condition. raise insurance! or don't hire them... lay them off. you might be cheating because why do you buy in these places at these times? The REAL money is in providing guesses from interpretation of the meta data. This information YOU DO NOT OWN and no privacy measures apply because their profile of you is not your property. again, potential for government abuse is HUGE -- your self-centered life might not matter-- but already with no tech--the FBI went after MLK spying on him and trying to even get him to kill himself. your influential leaders can be taken down; hell, you will help them do it by judging others so easily joining the MOB that social media is.

      6) Stupid AI profiling. your vague pattern is the same as a pedophile 60%. anybody seeing the profile will act differently to you. We all see stupid Netflix and amazon suggestions based on our profile. Imagine those being actually used for stuff...

      We need to print this in bold and put it up in lots of places. People are usually afraid of the government doing something to them via data collection...the private sector can be just the same or even much worse.

    22. Re:prefer cash by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Unlike this crappy AC I don't subscribe to the instant slippery slope fallacy where every technical innovate will bring about the End Of Days (TM).

      Congratulations on sticking to cash and paper receipts. I don't bother, and no one is forcing me to spend anything.

      That or the world will migrate to Bitcoin I suppose...

      This is a tech forum. Please leave unrealistic fantasy for comments on stories about cold fusion.

    23. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you carry your various ids around in a pocket? I have more than just cash in my wallet, Sparky.

    24. Re: prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I have to look judgingly on people who dont get the usefulness of paying cash.

    25. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/how-target-figured-out-a-teen-girl-was-pregnant-before-her-father-did/#70b7b6846668

    26. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A cashless society is about *debit* cards, not *credit* cards. I carry zero debt at all time (minus my mortgage). But I also have not used cash more than once or twice in the past few years. Debit everywhere. Especially now that there are tap-enabled cards/machines.

      The only worrisome part about using cards to pay for things is that the bank has a record of every purchase that you've ever made, and God knows how they use or could use that information. (Or a hacker if it were stolen.)

    27. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They saw the value in systems we weren't even able to think of

      You flatter them. Lots of people ran ponzi scams before the cryptocurrency fad jumped on that bandwagon.

      I will grant that it's more of a distributed ponzi scheme than the historical version of the scam, but cryptocurrency is still a ponzi scheme at heart. Lots of people buy in at the beginning and try to sell just before the prices collapse and the last wave of suckers and believers lose their money because nobody wants to buy.

    28. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) Your subversive and effective fliers you handed out at a protest.. (or perhaps your kid). have your printer's UID hidden on them, it was done in the 90s to track down fake money but naturally it expanded so an FBI agent can just scan your print outs and figure out who you are. how? you bought it with a generic card! Well, the price of the item can be estimated and used to narrow down the search... aside from product registrations, store repair plans,... besides, it's not like some printers don't have a serial number in the barcode that could be scanned in... and your generic card has your name connected to it which a bigger store does get access to. This is just a tiny bit of what is involved on this one.
      AWESOME!!!
      I pay by CC for big ticket items but this is so true and scary. Americans really have no understanding how evil a nation-state is and the need to keep it in control with vigilance and wisdom and education.

    29. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the hell do you get this from ?

      cloud atlas economy takes hold. (i.e you are required to spend a certain amount of money a week on consumption and probably negative interest rates and financial fees as punishment if you don't)

      This is pure speculation and total fake stuff...
      I dont use cash I have been chasless for more than a year and there's no " you need to spend everyweek this is total BS.

      The more I read the comment on here the more Im starting to thnk it's getting full of morons or its an attempt by some group to make us think people are even more stupid that they are in fact.

    30. Re:prefer cash by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yup, same here. I use credit cards, but I don't let them use me.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    31. Re:prefer cash by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      being able to predict what you buy and why however, that's pure gold.
      How so?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    32. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perfect response. Refreshing to see a millennial post this... Generation X...

    33. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I often don't carry ID when not driving -- the law doesn't require it, so I see no reason to carry my "papers" 24/7/365.

    34. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      This won't happen now, but if cash goes away, everyone's money is in the bank. Nothing to stop banks from charging a monthly fee (aka negative interest) to everyone for keeping their money, since there's no alternative. Contribute to the ecahhhhhnamy or lose your money.

    35. Re: prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only idiots see this as anything other than tyranny. No, this is not about "convenience".

      The trouble with millennials is they missed the whole cold war chapter. They missed the pain and destruction of lives that happened under socialism. They don't understand that the war that all democracies face is the forever-war against increasing centralised power.

      They literally think it's a good idea to hand the government more control, and they have no historical perspective on what happens next if we go down that road.

      They will give up everything in the belief that government can make things better. This ends badly.

    36. Re: prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are completely and utterly controllable. Right now you don't see that as an issue. One day I assure you that you will.

    37. Re:prefer cash by LazarusQLong · · Score: 1

      I travel internationally quite a lot... and it turns out that CASH IS KING, in many places, everyone prefers cash outside the US, though cards are able to be used 90% of the places I go, in most though they attach an extra surcharge to using a credit card (in Sydney, Australia it was 3 % for example). So, yeah, not exactly what that columnist would have you believe. Cash is still king.

      --
      "Governments have been dominated by the corporate entities and citizens have ceased to matter in public policy" true in
    38. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you simply don't want someone tracking *every* purchase you make? Or even certain purchases?

    39. Re:prefer cash by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      We could fix this. Stored value cards already exist, you can top them up with cash. They store the balance on the card and use crypto to authenticate transactions. The only flaws are that they include a unique ID that allows transactions to be linked to the card, and they keep a transaction history.

      We can make a card that uses a random ID or none at all, and has no history. Then it's basically the same as cash, but more convenient.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    40. Re:prefer cash by imrahilj · · Score: 1

      Another millenial here, I use cash often. For buying and selling in person between individuals, cash is a much better option than paypal/venmo/etc.

    41. Re: prefer cash by imrahilj · · Score: 1

      Where are you in the US? I also have a debit card and infrequently use it, I have never gotten a fee for using it anywhere other than a competing ATM. In fact, I have sometimes gotten discounts for using it rather than a credit card at gas stations.

    42. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      You actually seem to be closer to what I see as the millinnial view. We may be headed to cashless, but it won't involve credit cards.

    43. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      It definitely seems to be related to laws in some states. It happens all the time here in SoCal. Never seen it in my home state of MI.

    44. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      If you can't tie the use of the card to a specific account, you probably can't be in compliance with Know Your Customer laws for money exchange.

    45. Re:prefer cash by JD-1027 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same boat as you, but we need to go one step further. For those of us who know the proper way to use credit cards, many only GIVE you "cash" back.
      Amazon Visa - 2% restaurants always (3% on Amazon)
      Chase and Discover - Rotating 5% back on some categories

      That is free money.

      Personal note... cash is just too much of a hassle for me. I don't like always having to make sure I have enough in my wallet and dealing with change, so we usually just do credit card. I haven't run into any issues with companies knowing what I spend my money on. In some cases I get relevant coupons that actually help.

    46. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      As a responsible libertarian capitalist, what if I don't think it's fair that consumers are being systematically forced to pay higher fees for goods because of the captive market you choose to be part of?

    47. Re:prefer cash by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I use cash, contactless etc., whichever is best for what I am doing. I fail to understand this one size fits all mentality. It reminds me of when they introduced one size clothing that meant that it did not fit most people. How do you give your children pocket money in a cashless society? Am I really going to be expected to pay for a 10c item with a card? It is moronic.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    48. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      The problem with debit cards for the consumer is the P.O.S. fees. With credit cards, the fees are socialized so they essentially trick people into paying more. With debit cards, it's straight up, so many people buy into the credit card points game.

      And yes, many places charge fees for using a debit card. I challenge you to find a SoCal gas station or convenience store that does not.

    49. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      With inflation, we've already seen this. Between the 2008 meltdown and now, that's been the norm.

    50. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution is not allowing insurance companies to refuse insurance based on purchases.

      And if you don't think that the laws will save you, you will have to worry about cameras in the store and streets following your exact movements and actions. Using cash won't save you.

      Using cash will make it more expensive for the insurance company to get that data.

      It's not just the cost of the cameras and the subscription to the facial recognition service. it's that the vendor - say, a neighborhood bar or liquor store whose business relies on its customers' hankering for ethanol, or the local cupcake shop whose business relies on its customers' desire for delicious sugary treats topped with buttercream frosting - has no incentive to help a health insurance company cut down on its customers' use of their services.

      Your bartender or baker might be fine going cash-free without the cameras, because their cost of handling the cash is nonzero. Kilohealthshallowlearning Inc., can give your bartender/baker a payment terminal worth $50 "for free" and both sides win.

      But Megahealthdeepestlearning Inc., can't afford to "give" your bartender/baker $1000 worth of cameras and subsidize $50/month of API fees for facial recognition -- and your bartender or baker has no interest in paying even a tenth of the cost of the "service."

      Laws passed by Congress won't save you, but the laws of economics will. (At least for another 10-20 years until the Law of Moore brings down the cost of facial recognition into the $50 camera and $1/month range.)

    51. Re: prefer cash by dougdonovan · · Score: 0

      everyone in my office uses plastic for everything. my wife calls it living smart.

    52. Re: prefer cash by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      So we need to fix the laws as well. After all you can pay cash anonymously.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    53. Re: prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fees are paid by the merchant, and come out of your pocket in higher prices from that merchant. There have been a number of quickly suppressed news stories about horrible contracts from the big CC/debit companies about merchants not being allowed to reveal this. We ALL pay those processing fees for those who use cards or E payments - it's just baked into the prices.
      Seriously, if you think the banking system gives this stuff away out of the goodness of their satanic little hearts, I've got news for you...

    54. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually he already shared the reason. You just don't recognize social responsibility as a reason. I don't define dystopian possibilities by motion picture and believe that current day realities support my concern. My concern over cashless societies is that the ability to spend can be eliminated by financial interests on a per person basis. We have already seen where entities have cut off the ability to use non cash payment systems because of political objections. They have even held already existing transactions and refused to transfer cash they were already obliged to transfer. This isn't some theoretical imaginary weakness of a cashless society as the behavior has already happened and there has been no apology for it. It WILL happen again. So intentionally using cash helps maintain a status quo that allows two parties to transact on their own terms without a huge corporate third party having immediate power to interfere.

    55. Re:prefer cash by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "Drank too much Coke? Were making purchases at 11pm instead of being in bed?"

      You could be refused service because you bought too much with cash and they can't properly determine the risk to cover you. Or, they will only cover you at the highest rate because they are unable to assess your history.

    56. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far the only stored value cards I've seen that can be refilled require you to register them, including giving up your SSN. Have you found one that doesn't require that?

    57. Re:prefer cash by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I am in a similar position. Anything I spend on my credit card gets 0.5% cash back (it used to be 1%, but the EU capped card fees so now they're lower), so everything is cheaper if I pay by card. My bill is paid automatically 14 days after the statement date so the money stays in my account for 0.5-1.5 months after I make the purchase. I have an offset mortgage, so any money in my current account is reducing my payments by an amount equal to having paid that much of the mortgage off, so it's the equivalent of my credit card balance paying me my mortgage interest rate, without paying any tax on the income. The amount of money that I save by using a credit card is not huge, but it's far from negligible.

      I don't worry too much about tracking, because any company that actually wants to track me can do so almost as easily without the card. Anything that's delivered, they know my name and address anyway. I spoke to the person who runs the data mining for the supermarket chain I use and they apparently only aggregate at the store granularity because that's the information that they actually care about (they don't care what I buy, they care what things people that shop at the store near me buy).

      In terms of costs, there was a report on Slashdot a few years ago about the cost of transaction processing. A lot of cash advocates think that cash is free, but it isn't. Most merchant banks charge fees for handling large amounts of cash, you need extra security if you're keeping cash on the premises, you need to spend time balancing tills and making sure you have enough change, you need to securely transport the money to the bank, and so on. For a big chain, credit cards are a lot cheaper, for a small shop the break-even point for card payments is very low. I forget the exact number, but pretty much anywhere that can afford 2 or more employees saves money by taking cards.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    58. Re:prefer cash by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Hello,
      I'm not a millennial, far from it, I think you're smart and this 'columnist' is an idiot.
      Carry on..

    59. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a nice script for a dystopian horror movie, but I am of course totally wrong here and a paranoid nut case ripe for a one way trip to the funny farm.
      And sure you have nothing to hide, right? You are not a criminal or someone with dark desires. I know you aren't and you certainly are not that interesting. We are not snowflakes, we are just small cogs in the big machine. The Man doesn't have any desire to know us.

      Well I work with lots of data and the key thing people don't understand is that you don't need to have dark desires to lose something when bank or other institutes with lots of computation power start prying in what, when and where you buy stuff. They can play on your impulses by carefully calculating when you are at your most vulnerable to force you to buy that chocolate cookie. They might find out that you might have anxiety issues through the way you are spending your money. Nice target to sell some extra unneeded insurance. At my work we research the right amount of authority in the tone of a text a person needs to be persuaded to buy something. There is enough to lose for you. And sure: You are not special or a snowflake, you are just a walking bag of money with holes in it.

    60. Re:prefer cash by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Why would you do that? I have a credit card that's automatically paid off each month. There are a few differences between that and a debit card:
      1. I get 0.5% cash back on every transaction, so I'm paying less by using a credit card than I would be on a debit card.
      2. I get an interest-free loan in between the payment date and the time that the balance becomes due (0.5-1.5 months). That money is sitting in my account where it can earn me interest (or, in my case, reduce the interest that I'm paying on my mortgage).
      3. If there are any fraudulent transactions, I can query them before the money leaves my account, when they're still very much the bank's problem.

      Oh, and the bank doesn't get detailed purchase records (you can tell by the way that they hilariously miscategorise things on statements), only the shops that you use.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    61. Re: prefer cash by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The problem with debit cards for the consumer is the P.O.S. fees.

      Depends where you bank.

      And yes, many places charge fees for using a debit card.

      The financial institution might (although again, it depends where you do your banking), but a store typically won't. By law, any additional fee the merchant asks for a debit charge is required to be displayed before you agree to complete the transaction, and cancellation of that transaction costs nothing to the consumer. In most cases, the merchant will simply stipulate a minimum purchase amount before accepting debit at all.

    62. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't save you, but mitigates risk. And I wear a mask in public. Few notice.

    63. Re:prefer cash by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Cash allows you to avoid government scrutiny. As with much of the Constitution, the real reason of that is to stop people in power from scouring the activities of their political opponents, though it will be portrayed as trying to hide illegality.

      "If you have nothing to hide, what are you afraid of?" Exactly that.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    64. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a cellphone in your pocket when purchasing something they can link that IMEI or MAC to the transaction. Boom, same thing, you're tracked.

      Good luck escaping the tracking monolith.

    65. Re:prefer cash by dryeo · · Score: 1

      That is free money

      Do you think they just print up some money? Or it is money taken from others?

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    66. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What he said. Cash is king. Status symbol in 10 years will be clawing your privacy back. Save yourself the hassle, limit social media details, use cash, and freeze your credit agency reports. And no, I'm not a troll or paranoid. Canary in the coal mine is all the recent facebook stuff. Unintended consequences of people having too much detail on your life can bite you in unexpected ways.

    67. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get 0.5% cash back on every transaction, so I'm paying less by using a credit card than I would be on a debit card.

      Payment platforms taking money from the seller and giving it to the buyer to artificially entice them to use that platform is an abuse of power that should be outlawed.

      Most of the time seller doesn't have a real choice. They have to accept x, y z because it's what people have. This should be viewed as an anti-trust issue.

      I get an interest-free loan in between the payment date and the time that the balance becomes due (0.5-1.5 months). That money is sitting in my account where it can earn me interest (or, in my case, reduce the interest that I'm paying on my mortgage).

      Where do you bank that such theoretical interest would accumulate to more than rounding error? Here in the states banks have essentially stopped paying out interest for normal checking/savings accounts. You need to invest the money / transfer it out to get a return that is even discernible / worth the input effort.

      If there are any fraudulent transactions, I can query them before the money leaves my account, when they're still very much the bank's problem.

      Or use cash and bypass the issue entirely.

      Oh, and the bank doesn't get detailed purchase records (you can tell by the way that they hilariously miscategorise things on statements), only the shops that you use.

      Other people are getting this granular data and aggregating information about you over time. A task made trivial thanks to use of credit card instead of cash. Knowledge is power. Make no mistake data collection is for the benefit of others. One way or another it WILL be used against you.

    68. Re: prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pragmatism isn't the strong point of many of the tinfoil hatters that frequent this place. Nor is logic lol

    69. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent poster (religionofpeas) does indeed sound like a complete and total fool as your comments so rightly indicate. This column piece reminds one that it is the trend-by-design progression to a One World Corporation/One World Bank/One World Retail Outlet which should be readily apparent to anyone with a reading level upon a fifth-grader.

      Would strongly recommend to any and all fools like the one you responded to the following book: The Myth of Capitalism by Jonathan Tepper with Denise Hearn. --- sgt_doom

    70. Re: prefer cash by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Don't you have debit/interac in the US?

      Hey Canadian Anonymous Coward - For this question to make sense to Americans you have to ask -

      "Can't you pay everywhere with your ATM card, entering your ATM PIN at the Point-of-Sale, or simply by tapping your ATM card?"

      Americans - That's what "debit / interac" means in Canada - Paying with your ATM card. But most Canadians don't realize that term means nothing to most Americans, so they use the term "debit card" which, in the American context, isn't correct.

    71. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "credit cards, which aren't a problem if (a) they're no-fee and (b) you pay them off completely every month"

      except for the profile that will someday someway if not by the corp then by the gov't (probably both) be used to screw you

    72. Re:prefer cash by kingbilly · · Score: 1

      The Amazon Prime card is 5% back on Amazon, you should look into that.
      I'm similar to you then, some cards with rotating categories.

      - Sams Club Credit for 5% back on gas, almost everywhere (you don't need to get fuel from Sams)
      - AMEX for 6% back at grocery stores. And 3% at some department stores.
      - Amazon Prime for 5% at Amazon like mentioned above.
      - About to round it off by getting citi double cash rewards for everything else, for 2% instead of the 1% by my existing cards.

    73. Re:prefer cash by anegg · · Score: 2

      Same boat as you, but we need to go one step further. For those of us who know the proper way to use credit cards, many only GIVE you "cash" back. Amazon Visa - 2% restaurants always (3% on Amazon) Chase and Discover - Rotating 5% back on some categories That is free money.

      It is not exactly free money. The money that you get back came from the transaction fee that the credit card levied onto the merchants who sold you goods/services. Those merchants marked up the price of their goods/services to include the credit card transaction fee, and since so many people use credit cards these days, even for small transactions, the cost of everything has been increased so that we can enjoy this "convenience." Few merchants even bother giving a discount for cash any more, so we pay the price of credit even if we don't use it. Which justifies using credit cards even more (so that we can get at least some of our cash back).

      Meanwhile, the "retail credit" industry has managed to insert themselves into practically every retail transaction, skimming their percent or two, and growing very fat doing it. Hey - apparently we like the convenience of paying with plastic, so what's the harm?

      Meanwhile, the records linking all of the purchases to the purchasers are growing in huge numbers, and can be analyzed to determine many things. And that information isn't just in the hands of the retailers, because they make agreements and sell that information off. And ultimately it is available to the government, because although various constitutional protections (in the US) keep the government out of our knickers without a warrant, there is nothing stopping the government from buying commercially whatever is available - which happens to be a lot more data than could ever be gathered with a warrant.

      So yea, congratulate yourself on knowing the "proper" way to use credit cards so that you can get back a few percent of your own money. But be aware that you are the product that is being bought and sold, with every transaction being financed by your own money, with the minuscule amount they return to you being the price at which you are being bought.

    74. Re: prefer cash by lgw · · Score: 1

      After all you can pay cash anonymously.

      Only in small amounts. You cannot pay $10k anonymously, at least not legally in the US. The paperwork burden is high enough that most companies that sell high-value items simply refuse to accept large amounts of cash.

      The exception is auction houses. Art and stamps have been the core of money laundering and wealth transfer for decades, and auction houses know where their bread is buttered. (Diamonds are also used, but always smaller diamonds worth much less than $10k individually.)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    75. Re:prefer cash by lgw · · Score: 1

      The law requires is in many US states. Might want to check around.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    76. Re: prefer cash by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Debit cards are not as safe as a credit card. If a credit card is stolen it can be cancelled quickly and any fraudelent purchases dispuated with a cap on damage, the credit card company will take absorb the damage. With a debit card you don't have such protections usually and you can quickly lose a lot of money before you get the card cancelled (make sure there's a spending cap on the card, and refuse all the "you've been upgraded!" increases to the limit. A pre-paid credit card works much like a debit card and may be a good choice for some.

      There's an additional issue that using a credit card will help you build up a good credit score while a debit card will not. It's handy for students say, as the parents can have the bill sent to them with a monthly limit on what can be spent allowing them but the child is building up the credit score.

    77. Re: prefer cash by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Gasoline stations very often will give discounts for paying cash. However it's the main place that I use my credit card because the convenience of paying on the spot is worth the extra fee especially if it's in bad weather. However if I'm already in a cashier's line anyway then the extra credit card fee doesn't supply any advantage to me over cash.

    78. Re:prefer cash by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Also, if you're going to buy a house and want a mortgage, or you want a loan to buy an automobile (even if you plan to pay it off quickly), having a good credit score helps out a lot. You will want that mortgage someday and won't have the cash to pay for it all at once. But if you don't use a credit card then your credit score may not be very good as there's no history of paying off debts promptly and on time. Yes, it's a bit illogical that someone who goes out of his way to avoid debt is seen as a potential debt risk, but that's how things work.

      You can possibly get this to work for you without carrying a credit card all the time. Get a credit card then tie it to auto-pay with your utilities service. Ie, credit card pays the utility bill, and your bank account reconciles the credit card automatically at the end of the month.

      The key rule is to ALWAYS pay off the FULL balance of the credit card each month. The interest rates on even the best credit cards are ridiculously high. They're the easiest way to get quickly over your head in debt. Try to never have more than one credit card even though you keep getting these amazing offers in the mail. Occasionally you can use another (ie, $1500 off my refrigerator if I signed up for a Sears card) but cancel it as soon as you can.

    79. Re: prefer cash by lgw · · Score: 1

      Savings accounts have paid below inflation since we went off the gold standard. Banks are effectively charging a fee to store your money. Bit of a scam, since you're loaning the bank money, but in the modern world there are no very-low-risk investments that pay more than inflation.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    80. Re:prefer cash by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      This is where the trend towards installing driving monitoring devices for lower car insurance will lead. Eventually it will be too expensive to not get one.

    81. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The law requires you to identify yourself to cops if arrested, not to carry papers unless you're engaged in an activity (e.g. driving) that requires it.

    82. Re:prefer cash by Rob+Cebollero · · Score: 1

      Generally agree, except for the part about migrating to Bitcoin (or a flavor of Bitcoin that actually solved numerous problems with privacy).

      This would make things much worse, because the small circle of power brokers with arbitrary leverage over your purchasing power (by controlling liquidity) would merely shift from known adversaries (banks, governments, multinationals) to unknown adversaries (the same, but with zero accountability, plus a new caste of unapologetically fuck-you criminals who don't even bother to provide a nominal fig leaf of goods or services, much less accountability, in exchange for their parasitism). Not even getting into the Randian ancaps of the early adopter cohort who openly fantasize about "hyperbitcoinization" and a future where they live the baronial life in cloistered citadels, gloating over all the poor walled-out "nocoiner" masses left behind.

      It's not even 'bitcoin' that's the problem, per se. Bitcoin is essentially just a particular approach to implementing a seductive but poorly examined doctrinal position commonly referred to as 'decentralization.' Decentralization is, at best, a temporary transitional phase between centralized regimes. At worst, it is a mirage of political economics ginned up by cynical grifters whose only common motivation is to extract wealth from a hypergolic cocktail of greed and idealism. Game summary: devise a means to blow up (er, 'decentralize') the incumbent concentric structure of wealth, position yourself in the middle of the debris field, and sit back while fundamental social forces that crystallize as 'civilization' inexorably pull everything back together into the original concentric shape - but this time, *you* get to be at the center of decentralization.

      --
      Decentralization: the brief interval between the decline of one centralized regime and rise of another.
    83. Re:prefer cash by lgw · · Score: 1

      The law requires you to identify yourself to cops if arrested, not to carry papers unless you're engaged in an activity (e.g. driving) that requires it.

      Fair point: if the police officer understands this aspect of the law, and is in a good mood, he may be satisfied with your name, DOB, and address. Less risk in carrying an actual ID card, of course, for all that we know police are always perfect angels.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    84. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank charges a monthly fee for the debit card and other little associated stuff, I would save money if I went 100% cash and just withdrew my money each month from the meatbag bank teller. They'd consider me as an even lower class individual and wouldn't let me have modest negative balance for "free" as I may have now.

    85. Re:prefer cash by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      It really is time to buy laser printers with cash.

    86. Re:prefer cash by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      That's if the credit card will even do business with you. Amazon gives their cardholders a 5% discount. So if Chase doesn't like you you have to pay 5% extra for everything at Amazon. Hope you've been taking care of your social credit score...https://fossbytes.com/china-social-credit-system-people-rating/

    87. Re:prefer cash by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      Better not say anything online to make you the target of Maoist Mobs. Wouldn't want to be charged 5% more than regular people for having the wrong views...

    88. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO. Please, educate yourself.
      Ponzi - noun, system that eats your money unless others come in to pay you off, thereafter they get eaten, until same, last ones in LOSES.

      Legitimate distributed fixed issuance cryptocurrencies ARE NOT PONZI's.

      YOU are the one in control of when you get in, get out, or spend, or hold, and at what price and for what reasons... crypto is first an investment in new "stock" that will grow until equilibrium, and also is always a currency.

      You cannot demonstrate how BCH, BTC, ZEC, LTC, ETH... are ponzi.
      At the very worst, cryptos are a stock investment.
      But they're really just gold.
      Gold always floats pursuant to whatever people believe.
      That's fine :)

    89. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      If the pigs aren't tested regularly as to their willingness to follow the law, bad ones can't be outed, publicized, and sued.

    90. Re:prefer cash by bozzy · · Score: 2

      I'm in a similar position as you and the GP, but the "free money" is only "free" up to the point when you realize that use of cash maintains the spending friction that keeps impulse buys at bay.

      Statistically speaking, you'll spend more when using a credit card compared to cash due to less friction, which blows away any savings you get with a cash back card. You'll have to be extremely well disciplined to come out ahead with the cashback card on a given transaction. But over time, the odds are stacked against us due to being human.

      A debit card has a slightly higher friction than a credit card due to the mental connection of the transaction with your bank balance. But with a credit card, there is no such friction. Even less friction when a credit card is tied to mobile pay, or god forbid, some IoT device (alexa) you don't even hold.

    91. Re:prefer cash by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      Wal*Mart bristles with cameras that store your car's license plate forever along with footage of you walking into the store. At the checkout your picture is snapped. Facial recognition is used to determine your loss risk when you walk in the door and security is notified. Wal*Mart is a private business - they can refuse you entry - but that was impractical until recently - they couldn't remember your face at all the Wal Marts, or unless you made a major pain of yourself probably wouldn't even remember you at a single Wal*Mart. Now they could concievably bar someone from all Wal*Marts. This gives Wal*Mart far more power over their customers than LocalMart. Piss off Amazon and WalMart and you are kind of screwed. Their rules begin to have bite. It's almost as if Monopolies are like governments with the power to enforce their will - not only their will to keep competition out, but to keep their customers in line ( whatever that is ). Don't have the wrong opinions or they might choose to stop dealing with you. Beware the social credit score

    92. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      But if you saved money, you wouldn't have a negative balance. Who cares what a bunch of clerks think of you?

    93. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy and use and exchange and save cryptocurrencies, millions of you around the world, you will both control more than the broker whales, and be making your own liquidity.

      YOU are truly the only ones in control, the only ones who can create outcomes, so recognize your RESPONSIBILITY therein, grab that fucker by the horns, and become free.

      If you actually sit down and do the adoption math, with only %10 of all global personal liquid cash, gold, stocks, savings put into crypto for savings and usage, which is a VERY REASONABLE allocation %, ANY amount of crypto you buy and manage over time right now TODAY, will be worth 100X. Get your CITADEL.

      You also don't really understand decentralization Voluntaryism Libertarianism Anarchism, there are edge views of that, however on the continuum compared to the bullshit of the world today, they are far closer to educating about how to do things yourselves. You're not a BABY.

    94. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will never tell you that your diet causes cancer, we'll just make a note of unhealthy lifestyle factors and adjust your insurance costs appropriately. Maybe we can deny paying for your treatment since you should have known better.

    95. Re:prefer cash by suutar · · Score: 1

      Of course it's taken from others. I believe the theory is that this kind of stuff comes out of their cut of the transaction processing fee, so it's being taken from the merchant... who may be getting it back from you by charging extra for card transactions (most common with gasoline, that I've seen).

    96. Re:prefer cash by dryeo · · Score: 1

      All prices go up to support the card transaction fees, especially if most all stores accept fees. So if I pay cash, I'm subsidizing you.
      Of course the real advantage for retailers is people spending money they don't have or can't afford to, assuming a large number of people using cards are not paying it off every month. Something I'm not sure is in the best interests of society as the average household has quite a bit of debt.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    97. Re:prefer cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia cashless transactions are already impacting on the process of getting a bank loan for a house after a government crackdown on bad lending practices. Banks are going through applicant's expenditure records with a fine tooth comb.

      "I see you have recently bought nursery furniture (actually a gift to your pregnant sister) Are you having a baby in the immediate future?"

      You've purchased dog food at the pet store and have a transaction at a veterinary clinic (because you're looking after a friend's pet while they're on holidays). "Do you have a pet that you haven't told us about in your declared expenses?"

      "I see you spend $30.00 three times a week buying takeaways from restaurants with Uber eats. Can you really afford that and still make your payments.?" Etc.

      Godel_56 with mod points.

    98. Re:prefer cash by Malizar · · Score: 1

      That "free" money is charged to the vendor who processed the credit card, so the vendor raises prices to cover the extra expense. You are paying yourself, and others, and considering it to be "free" money.

    99. Re: prefer cash by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      If a credit card is stolen it can be cancelled quickly and any fraudelent purchases dispuated with a cap on damage, the credit card company will take absorb the damage. With a debit card you don't have such protections usually

      The protections on a debit card depend on the institution that issues it. My credit union has the same protections for their debit cards as a standard credit card. The only difference is that your account is short the money you dispute until it is put back, where you don't pay the disputed amount for a CC.

      There's an additional issue that using a credit card will help you build up a good credit score

      Some of us are old enough we already have a credit score.

    100. Re:prefer cash by terrycarlino · · Score: 2

      It's all very well that many of us use a mixture of cash, credit and debit cards, and there are many good reasons to want to use cash, including surveillance, but one issue is that some people must pay a premium to not use cash. And often they are the people who can least afford to lose money to fees.

      We've covered this before. In the U.S. banks are not required to do business with anyone. They can decide they don't want to do business with you. This includes Visa and Mastercharge (who by the way have been banning individuals based on their views and not their financials.)

      Most often banks will require a minimum amount to open an account. And require it sit unused for some period of time. Poor people often don't have enough money to meet these requirements. So they can't get a check account. That means no debit card. If they have bad or no credit they can't get a credit card. They must pay a fee for pre-paid cards.

      Having only cash becomes a barrier to entry. Certain neighborhoods already have problems with a lack of stores, particularly grocery stores. If stores around these neighborhoods won't take cash that makes the problem even worse.

    101. Re:prefer cash by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      It's more likely to be the government. There is already a place where this happens. If you have money in a retirement fund when you reach a certain age you must start drawing that money even if you don't need to so that the government can start collecting taxes on it. You are basically penalized for having enough retirement income not to have to draw some arbitrary amount from your accounts, just so they government can force you to start paying taxes on it.

    102. Re:prefer cash by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Are EFTPOS transactions in Australia itemized? I.e. do the bankscum know that you made a purchase of $52 from the grocery store last Wednesday, or do they know that you spent $5 on crisps, $10 on fruit, $20 on beer, etc, etc, etc?

    103. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Yes, stores commonly charge debit fees in many places. Yes, you have an opportunity to cancel beforehand. So what? The point is in many places debit cards regularly incur fees at P.O.S.

    104. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      And no, it does not depend on where you bank. It depends on where you shop. As I initially stated to your abject skepticism, there fees are charged by the merchant at P.O.S., not by your bank.

    105. Re: prefer cash by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, KYC laws aren't going anywhere. We'll drop murder as a crime before we drop money laundering.

    106. Re:prefer cash by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      It's all very well that many of us use a mixture of cash, credit and debit cards, ...

      If you have a CC then there's no need/reason to use or even have a Debit card.

      I would also argue that Debit cards are a bad idea as they're directly linked to your bank account. Sure they seem to offer protections similar to a CC, but if it's used fraudulently you have to ask to get your money back with a Debit card (and to rectify anything that went wrong with your account in the interim), rather than simply disputing and not paying for the disputed items as with a credit card. Simply put, a credit card is safer than a debit card.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    107. Re: prefer cash by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Any additional fees the merchant charges must be the first message the customer sees when they are handed the machine, and the customer has to acknowledge that amount, essentially like a tip where the dollar value of the tip is precalculated. The combined total is then displayed and the customer again has to approve that total amount before their PIN is entered. Any fees the merchant charges cannot be hidden, unlike a regular banking fee. Independently run ATM's that charge a fee to dispense cash are required to do the same thing. In both cases, at least in my experience, it is not too inconvenient to avoid these fees by simply spending a small amount of extra effort to use alternative facilities that do not charge them.

    108. Re: prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      If a credit card is stolen it can be cancelled quickly and any fraudelent purchases dispuated with a cap on damage, the credit card company will take absorb the damage..

      Absolute horse shit... The card company takes ZERO damages. The fraudulent funds are pulled back out of the merchant's account. Visa/MC aren't on the hook for anything, unless they can't get the money back from the merchant.. Only then do they pony up cash.. I have a merchant account and the TOS are quite clear that I'm responsible for ensuring that a card is used only by the authorized person.

      I had a customer dispute a charge (short story: the bank was in error and double processed her card, not I) and within a few moments of her calling her issuing bank the funds were pulled back out of my account.. Took me 3 months to prove that I had a right to that money.. I got it back eventually, but it was a giant pain-in-the-ass.

    109. Re:prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      And when someone fucks up and puts a name into "the computer" with a spelling error and the computer matches it to you, you'll be singing a different tune. You can't freeze cash..

      Many millennials are morons. Just because shit hasn't happened to you yet, doesn't mean it can't/won't... I use a card, but you can bet your ass I have an emergency stack of cash...

    110. Re: prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      2. Write to bank instructing them to immediately halt all sharing of your data with these organisations as is your legal right under Article 18 of the EU GDPR. https://gdpr-info.eu/art-18-gd...

      Kinda funny you post a direct link to the document and yet it's clear you either haven't read it or don't possess an adult level of reading comprehension.

      I read it and it's quite clear that as long as the data is accurate, necessary for the collector to conduct business, and not illegally obtained, they can tell you to go suck a bag of dicks.

      There are all sorts of reasons your bank might need to share data with a 3rd party. Credit reporting, collections, etc... Your desire to block that apparently isn't always supreme.

      I'll grant you that the EU does seem to be way more concerned with the privacy of it's citizens, at least on an economic level, but it would appear that right is not paramount to all valid reasons.

      I'd further wager that if EU companies begin to suffer under the restrictions you do have, they'll be relaxed the moment it becomes clear the EU might slip in global trade.. Nobody wants to see their wealth being drained (well, besides the US obviously as we just can't seem to send enough cash to China) and nobody wants to dive into a recession. The more onerous (even if just) your laws and red tape become, the harder it is for companies to compete with low cost alternatives.

      Economics and social policies tend to act a bit like a pendulum swinging back and forth until some reasonable middle ground is reached. But even that stability is usually short lived as times change and economic/global crises come and go.

      The GDPR is a relatively new policy and nobody is sure what the total ramifications are yet. I'd be a little less cocky about it...

    111. Re:prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      We could fix this. Stored value cards already exist, you can top them up with cash.

      And just how the fuck are you going to do that in a cashless society? The whole point of this article is about millenials not using cash...

    112. Re:prefer cash by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      What? In many states you can buy prepaid VISA cards at the 7-11 in denominations up to $500.. Nobody is pulling any IDs..

  2. cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction. I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by niftydude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The people insisting on it and claiming it will be inevitable are the people profiting from it. If enough sock puppets and talking heads move public opinion such that it seems like a foregone conclusion, then people will be more likely to sleep walk into the brave new world of zero privacy and nickel and diming of every purchase.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    2. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nuh uh electronic is magic and means I don't have to do stuff, any other effect I can't immediately see is obviously nonexistent

    3. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction. I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      There is a cost to the merchant for handling cash - theft, counting, transportation, bank deposits/withdrawals, etc.

      Do cash handling costs add up to what the merchant pays to accept credit cards? I suspect not (but I don't work in retail).

      But I strongly suspect cash handling costs are much more than what the merchant pays to accept debit card payments.

    4. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is a cost to the merchant for handling cash - theft, counting, transportation, bank deposits/withdrawals, etc." Bank deposits and withdrawals? Now you're just trolling.

    5. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by niftydude · · Score: 2

      He's not wrong. Time is money, and time a business owner has to spend (either his or an employee's) to go to the bank and deposit the day's take, or withdraw rolls or change has a cost.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
    6. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fully Distributed P2P Transaction Mineable Privacy Cryptocurrencies

      That's the only way out.

    7. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction. I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      You don't understand why people don't like making daily/weekly trips to their bank?
      Do you not travel?
      Never had to deal with a shortage in a register?
      On the phone with a client that owes you money and expect them to show up at your office with cash?
      I mean you can't understand why people don't like knocking on doors asking for payment?

      Electronic payments have solved SOOOOO many problems. For all their warts they're still better than ATM fees, bounced checks, check cashing fees, etc. IDK where you get % of your income to credit card companies from, they make more money off interchange than interest - which is zero when you pay your balance each month. Credit card companies are the banks... literally they are. They’ve always been the middle man unless you take cash from your employer straight to the mattress. They're generally for-profit, and even when not someone is paying for those branch offices, "free" tellers and in-network ATMs. If you don't like the amount of fees paid to the banking/payment industry OK, but middlemen? Hellooooooooo...

    8. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, there's the bank that issued the card, then the network (visa,amex, mc, jcb, discover), then the gateway (fiserv/firstdate/elavon) then the card processor, then the store. and they all have to get paid. And, hopefully, none of them will get hacked too often or too hard.

      with cash, you simply have to trust people, waaaay fewer people. or you can have an armored car company do the pickup/delivery of cash.

      the problem with cash is that it burns, or flys away in a wind. the problem with credit is any of the above listed entities and their network providers can have a fault that makes your credit card useless. There's only so much redundancy that you can buy, and still, if you get two internet connections to your store, they're probably both riding the same fiber cable between your store and the local central office, unless you specifically pay for them not to, and this can be very $50k expensive.

    9. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Krishnoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Foregone conclusion? Sleep walk? The millenials are born into a digital world where a cell phone gives them more reach than anything the previous generation had at their age. This isn't something they need to be convinced to accept -- it's reality from day one.

      By the next generation, anyone who didn't have some digital dirt in their childhood may just be treated as a late bloomer or someone who lost their virginity later in life, not much beyond something of a curiosity.

    10. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! There is already enough people trying to take a cut on anything that happens!

      Take for example our renowned IT collaborator from San Jose; he currently is trying to monetize and exploit Stan Lee beyond the grave! His name is creimer.

    11. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      You don't understand why people don't like making daily/weekly trips to their bank?

      Maybe we need something like Doordash except for cash. Or perhaps little boxes sprinkled all over the city that let you withdraw from your bank account, like some kind of automatic bank teller but as a machine?

      Do you not travel?

      Not everyday, no. I usually only travel for business or pleasure.

      On the phone with a client that owes you money and expect them to show up at your office with cash?

      I've mailed out about 60 checks this year. I've been getting a lot of construction done on my house and that's how the contractors get paid.

      Never had to deal with a shortage in a register?

      Or chargebacks. Or a down processing network.

      I mean you can't understand why people don't like knocking on doors asking for payment>

      I had no idea that the state of the U.S. Postal Service has gotten to this point. Stamps are what, like $8 now?

      IDK where you get % of your income to credit card companies from, they make more money off interchange than interest

      Interchange fees work out to a few percent in the majority of transactions.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    12. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foregone conclusion? Sleep walk? The millenials are born into a digital world where a cell phone gives them more reach than anything the previous generation had at their age.

      Yawn... global mass communications has been a reality for generations.

      This isn't something they need to be convinced to accept -- it's reality from day one.

      And the relevance of the obvious to persistence of cash is???

      By the next generation, anyone who didn't have some digital dirt in their childhood may just be treated as a late bloomer or someone who lost their virginity later in life, not much beyond something of a curiosity.

      Meanwhile back in the real world present day teens are the ones bailing on Facebook in the largest numbers. Apparently it's no fun having parents, schools and other kids stalking you 24x7. Who'd have guessed.

    13. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Businesses have costs for cash too. Paying a secure transport company to provide vans and guards to transport it to the banks. Losses from counterfeit currency. Losses from store employees who 'lose' some of the money from the till. Cashless payment fees are usually less than a percent - cheaper than handling cash.

    14. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction. I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      Already happened in videogames, people sleepwalked into the theft of their own software to be run on their own computers in isolation from the rest of the internet. Now even windows has drm in it. Shit is disgusting. The average person on our planet is a moron.

    15. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know his name. The real question is, what do we do about him?

    16. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction.

      The cut for electronic transaction is smaller than the cut for cash. Cash requires sorting, counting, transporting, and takes more time at the cash register.

    17. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by DogDude · · Score: 2

      Cashless payment fees are usually less than a percent - cheaper than handling cash.

      False.
      Credit cards cost about 3%, not 1%, which is much more than the cost of handling cash.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    18. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the phone with a client that owes you money and expect them to show up at your office with cash?

      I've mailed out about 60 checks this year. I've been getting a lot of construction done on my house and that's how the contractors get paid.

      Hahaha, i'll bet they love you.

    19. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Sure, he's not 100% wrong, but he's far from right. Many merchants will charge you an additional fee to use your credit card, while cash and check run ~3% less.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    20. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      There is always a middle man taking a cut of an electronic transaction.

      The cut for electronic transaction is smaller than the cut for cash. Cash requires sorting, counting, transporting, and takes more time at the cash register.

      Please explain why merchants will charge you 3% more for credit transactions then.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    21. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      "Cash, barter or trade" has been the standard for business since time out of mind. It's part of the *cost of doing business.* Paraphrasing a movie quote, you never go full cashless.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    22. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Code+Herder · · Score: 1

      For now: volume

      They still have to pay for secure cash transport, handling etc and in some places I guess (US?) the bulk is still cash.

    23. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in the EU. Here it is illegal to do so. And yes he is right, handling of cash is much more expensive than debit/credit card terminals.

    24. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by dwywit · · Score: 1

      And that cost is - or should be - passed on to the customer - just like card transaction fees.

      If consumers don't like "no-cash" businesses, then they'll choose to spend their money elsewhere.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    25. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't. In the EU it is illegal to pass it on to the consumer. And the merchant fee to Visa/Mastercard here is about 1%.

    26. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      The world of cashless payments is much bigger than credit cards, at least in the part of the world with a modern banking system.

      I have a choice between chip & PIN, or contactless payment.

    27. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That 3 or 4% cut is what is driving the push to a "cashless society" (less cash for you, more cash for the big banks)

    28. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, he's not 100% wrong, but he's far from right. Many merchants will charge you an additional fee to use your credit card, while cash and check run ~3% less.

      Aside from motor fuel, every merchant prices everything to include at least 3% for the credit card companies, so the people paying cash subsidize the credit card users.

    29. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Businesses have costs for cash too. Paying a secure transport company to provide vans and guards to transport it to the banks. Losses from counterfeit currency. Losses from store employees who 'lose' some of the money from the till. Cashless payment fees are usually less than a percent - cheaper than handling cash.

      Sorry, cashless payments run 1- 10% of the transaction, plus and transaction fee as well as statement fees, not to mention the cost / rental fees associated with the terminals.

    30. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because one doesn't follow the other. Cashless != Credit Card, and I don't fork over anything (both directly in fees, or indirectly in product costs) much less a "few percent of my income".

      Cashless economies do not list Credit Cards as the alternatives. We use debit cards, direct debit transactions, custom bank based payment methods, and for some rare cases, crypto currencies.

    31. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, the letter to the mayor said *banks* want to save money. That's wrong. It's the banks that are making money. The millennials just have Jetsons Disorder.

      In retail it will vary a great deal. If you sell a loss leader item for little more than cost then you have to pay to sell it via card. In general, the idea that cash costs money for the retail business doesn't make sense. People don't work extra days or extra hours to handle cash. I suspect the people who are thinking that way are the people who hope to eliminate employees with auto-checkout.

      The newish Stop and Shop in my neighborhood has 10 auto-checkouts, 2 checkouts with clerks, and one line for each. I'm not going to shop there. (Which is an easy decision, anyway: Most of their prices are higher than the nearby Whole Foods!)

    32. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by nasch · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      The merchant pays that fee, not you. Either they pass it on to all their customers in pricing or eat it, so whether you use cash or card makes no difference to how much you pay.

      I assume by "your income" you mean the income of the buyer, not the income of the merchant. Obviously there are good reasons to accept credit and debit cards as a merchant.

    33. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      No, the credit card companies charge them that much, and they pass it along. Many businesses have a very small profit margin, where even a percentage point makes the difference between a profitable exchange and one that isn't. Does this 3% disappear in places that have gone cashless? If so, how are the financial institutions making money on the transactions, because you know they're pushing for this.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    34. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That last part is a naive presumption and one not borne out by the actions of millennials to such things now. Human nature will remain the same.

    35. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, if they are big enough, an armored car service. Also not free.

    36. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never run or patronized a small business. Cost to do business with cashless systems is a minimum of 3%, by the time you buy the terminals (or rent them) it's closer to 4.5-5 (unless it's an iPad with Square, then it's more like 7%). Cash is less than a half of a percent in labor to deal with.

      Nearly a third of the small businesses I deal with on a regular basis only accept cash, it keeps prices down.
      FWIW, this is in New York- not some third world craphole.

    37. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Drethon · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      The merchant pays that fee, not you. Either they pass it on to all their customers in pricing or eat it, so whether you use cash or card makes no difference to how much you pay.

      I assume by "your income" you mean the income of the buyer, not the income of the merchant. Obviously there are good reasons to accept credit and debit cards as a merchant.

      Plus I doubt many merchants "eat it", I'm pretty sure they all set prices to account for credit card fees, including prices paid by cash customers (though one of our family run businesses started passing the fee on to CC users, which is fine with me as I pay them cash to help them out). So I suspect everyone gets to deal with the CC fees, except those getting cash back get a small portion of the fees back...

    38. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contactless payment - I presume you mean apple pay or android pay, where ultimately the charge goes to your credit card? Now you have 2 middle men who will get paid.

    39. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time is money....what is the cost to have the branch manager and another employee go do a bank drop off?

      The costs is the time to count all of the money, which is maybe 30 minutes per employee involved, so 1 man hour, and then the time to drive to a night depository, which they do on their way home and takes 15 minutes for 2 employees.

      So the cost to the business is 1.5 man hours. Let's assume they make $100,000 a year, so about $50 an hour. So the cost to the business to handle cash is $75 a day?

      What is the cost of 3% of your daily receipts you pay to a credit card merchant? It is way more then $75 a day.

    40. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by nasch · · Score: 1

      Yeah there are a few businesses with a lower cash price, but that's pretty unusual in my experience.

    41. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is. I don't do online shit anymore. Fuck all the if ignorant shitstains

    42. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      It's not the future, it's the pipe dream of those who hope to get those extra few percent of your income and sell your shopping habit data for a little more. The thing is there are still plenty of people making private transactions that they can't get a percentage of or track and that is going to continue to happen for a very long time.

    43. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Cash costs more to handle than credit cards for many retailers. As well as slowing down transactions, mistakes are inevitable, it has to be counted, it has to be taken to the bank, and there has to be enough of a float in every till to provide change.

      Most of the places that charge you less for cash are not putting it through the books so they can avoid paying sales tax, or are selling high value products where the percentage becomes significant such as airlines.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    44. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      About 50% of gas stations on this side of the pond charge 10-20c less per gallon for cash payments. That said, I suspect the reasoning is as much about getting customers to walk into the store, where they might be tempted to buy something (which is where the real money is made) as it is to save money on credit card transaction fees.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    45. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cash costs more to handle than credit cards for many retailers.

      And yet no one ever charges a fee to use cash / offers a discount for using a credit card, while the inverse does happen. Plus you never see a minimum purchase amount to use cash yet a minimum charge amount to use a card is not unheard of.

      Will cash one day become more expensive to handle than credit cards? Maybe, but I won't believe that day has arrived until the above situations flip.

    46. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by reanjr · · Score: 1

      The problem is the legal lockdown and network effects that force businesses into otherwise undesired contractural obligations on their pricing.

      In most places, one must offer Visa or MC or go out of business. And if I accept Visa or MC, I must also accept that Visa or MC has some say over how I price my goods. I cannot pass on the cost to the appropriate customer. I must instead pass it on to all my customers.

      So, your theory of consumer behavior breaks down in the face of economic and legislative reality.

    47. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cashless payment fees are usually less than a percent - cheaper than handling cash.

      Not n the US thay isn't.

    48. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a benefit - they can steal from their own till and avoid taxes - double your fun. Which is why some shops near me only take cash... Tips are handy that way too.

    49. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      But I strongly suspect cash handling costs are much more than what the merchant pays to accept debit card payments.

      Most gas stations aren't allowed to assess a surcharge for credit cards, but they CAN give a discount for cash. (Some gas stations ARE allowed to assess a credit surcharge, but that practice is prevented by some states.) That's why the default price is the credit price, and why there's a cash discount, it's actually a matter of law. The retailers have no motivation to argue against this, of course, because they make more money on the non-cash debit card sales.

      However, as a customer, you should never use a non-credit-type debit card to make purchases anywhere, because those cards lack the strong purchase protection which is offered by credit cards. It's okay to make a Visa or Mastercard "debit card" purchase, but never make a Plus or Pulse debit card purchase. You can't trivially have those charges reversed like you can with the credit card-processor-backed ones.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 1

      Cashless payment fees are usually less than a percent - cheaper than handling cash.

      False.

      Credit cards cost about 3%, not 1%, which is much more than the cost of handling cash.

      That depends on where in the world you are. Looking at Sweden (which afaik has one of the highest rate of debit/credit card vs cash usage in the world) you can get (I browsed the arbitrarily chosen 5000 transactions/month) less than $10 fixed monthly fee, 0.64% for debit, 1.085% for credit with an additional $0.08 fee per transaction. These are list prices, finding out the cost of handling cash is more difficult, but from what I heard it's usually about 3-5% (direct costs only). If you want to continue using cash you'll need legislation or get used to paying for the privilege directly at the till, the difference in cost is simply not long term sustainable.

    51. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Because, friend OrangeTide, the current prevailing business models all boil down to pay, Pay, PAY endlessly. Corporations (The Rich, really) want to remake the world into a place where only They get to own things, and everyone else only rents them. So of course they want you to 'rent' your own money you earn, by taking some of it when you try to spend it. Can't do that if you have nasty-old physical cash, now can they?
      Also they want to be able to track every single dollar you spend, know where it came from and where it goes, which goes in your Very Personal Profile, so they can target more and more ads at you, so you'll buy more things, so they get more fees, and more data, and so on, and so on.
      Governments of course will love a cashless world, because when you can't spend a single dollar without announcing your precise location, it's about as good as GPS for tracking individual citizens' whereabouts.

      Needless to say we must fight against this 'cashless' bullshit tooth and nail.

    52. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cash is king as it is faster and free, at least since the chip. Some of my favorite places to eat and shop are cash only, seriously!
      And to me, 50 seconds chatting with the cashier while they make change goes by a lot faster than 20 seconds of waiting for an electronic transaction to go through. And, as a bonus, sometimes I can get her number. ;)

    53. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Visa and MC lost a class-action lawsuit over this one. You can now charge fees for credit card transactions.

    54. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing DogDude is in the US. Chip&Pin is much rarer there, and credit cards are favored over debit cards.

    55. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by anegg · · Score: 1

      Cash costs more to handle than credit cards for many retailers. As well as slowing down transactions, mistakes are inevitable, it has to be counted, it has to be taken to the bank, and there has to be enough of a float in every till to provide change.

      Easily proven false. Although fewer places do it now, it used to be fairly common to get a "cash discount." I have never been offered a discount for using credit. Although credit card transactions have gotten speedier now that signatures aren't required, they aren't substantially faster than cash with an experienced cashier and/or change dispenser. And those "no signature" transactions carry increased risk of fraudulent transactions, the cost of which is buried in the transaction fees charged the merchants, who add it to the cost of goods/services sold.

    56. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Looking at Sweden

      Sweden has banking and finance regulations. The US, largely doesn't. In the US, it costs 3-4% to take credit cards, and that number isn't going down unless there's some real legislation passed. That'll happen just as soon as donkeys fly.

      , but from what I heard it's usually about 3-5% (direct costs only)

      That's a wildly incorrect number. It costs $30-$50 to count up $1000 in cash and deposit it in a bank? That doesn't even pass the smell test. If it costs a business that much money to deal with cash, they're simply incompetent.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    57. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stupid thing is a lot of that can be automated but isn't. Cashiers shouldn't be counting change. The machine should simply spit out the right amount to the customer like an ATM.

    58. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, i'll bet they love you.

      The general contractor specifically ask that I pay by check for record keeping purposes. The nice thing is I can go online and review pictures of my checks, and note what is outstanding in my check register.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    59. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      But I strongly suspect cash handling costs are much more than what the merchant pays to accept debit card payments.

      Then why do fueling stations offer cash discounts? Cash payment gets you between $0.10 and $0.20 off per gallon vs credit card payment.

    60. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "Let's assume they make $100,000 a year"

      Yes, handling cash has a cost that isn't insignificant. That said, people that make $100k in retail do not make bank runs. And if they do, they are salaried and its just part of the job.

    61. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a wildly incorrect number. It costs $30-$50 to count up $1000 in cash and deposit it in a bank? That doesn't even pass the smell test. If it costs a business that much money to deal with cash, they're simply incompetent.

      Now that's an asinine test. You have not include a single cent towards security for transport of cash. There's a simple reason why armed robberies of cash transports have gone down dramatically here in Sweden...

    62. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own a c-store gas station.
      It's about the credit and debit fees.

      We make the money off of alcoholics, nicotine addicts, sugar and salt freaks, and potheads.
      The parking lot is full of drug dealers who only take cash.
      All staff open carry.

      I give gallons of milk away to the moms and homeless.

      We have a bidir cryptocurrency ATM in the store at 4%, it's *very* popular with the investor types.

      No worries.

    63. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by tepples · · Score: 1

      If consumers don't like "no-cash" businesses, then they'll choose to spend their money elsewhere.

      The problem comes with no-cash government or when all businesses in a particular class that serve a particular area all go no-cash.

    64. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by tepples · · Score: 1

      The world of cashless payments is much bigger than credit cards

      Perhaps in the "world". But Slashdot's headquarters is in the USA, and the USA of cashless payments is Visa and MasterCard, with some stores also offering Discover and American Express. I haven't seen more than a handful of chains that accept Interlink and Maestro debit cards but not Visa and MasterCard credit cards.

    65. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by tepples · · Score: 1

      Cashless economies do not list Credit Cards as the alternatives. We use debit cards

      In the USA, it's a distinction without a difference, as debit cards carry the same Visa and MasterCard logos as credit cards. I can't name a single brick and mortar business near me that accepts debit cards but not credit cards.

    66. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by tepples · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps little boxes sprinkled all over the city that let you withdraw from your bank account, like some kind of automatic bank teller but as a machine?

      For a nominal $4 fee per withdrawal: $2 to your bank and $2 to the owner of the ATM. Your bank offers a fee-free ATM, but it's across town, and you need to spend a half hour on your bike each way to get there and back.

      Interchange fees work out to a few percent in the majority of transactions.

      A few percent plus 30 cents. When paying for a $1 diet soda, the 30 cents dominate.

    67. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by smoot123 · · Score: 1

      don't understand why people insist that the way of the future is to fork over a few percent of your income to credit card companies.

      Very few vendors seem to charge extra for using plastic. Gas stations seem to be the only ones I bump into. Given I'm paying the same price either way, I'll use more-convenient plastic.

    68. Re: cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "By the next generation, anyone who didn't have some digital dirt in their childhood may just be treated as a late bloomer or someone who lost their virginity later in life, not much beyond something of a curiosity."

      I would hope that would be the case, but I doubt it. I wonder what may happen soon with the new crop of politicians who have every childhood indiscretion documented in some database. Even if their messages can't be used for blackmail directly there may a parallel construction way to use it.

      "The millenials are born into a digital world where a cell phone gives them more reach than anything the previous generation had at their age. "

      But this reach can quickly be denied with the flip of a switch. It really is disturbing that people don't plan ahead because they can text at the last minute and if they can't they are SOL. Impulsive behavior leads to less success in life. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshmallow_test

    69. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they are retarded
      millenials are literally retarded subhumans

    70. Re:cashless transactions == tax on stupidity by bigtech · · Score: 1

      When you buy $100 worth of goods with a credit card, you receive $100 worth of goods. You pay nothing. The vendor, however, receives $97. For me, it's all upside -- credit cards are convenient, offer fraud protection and often have benefit programs that I like.

  3. Millennials Will Live To See a Cashless World... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...you poor bastards. Hope you enjoy total surveillance.

  4. Sure... but that's only because Earth's temperature is going to increase exponentially, and soon it'll be too hot to print money anymore. Thank god I'm old and won't be around much fucking longer anyway. I don't envy them. Good luck, kids... that's all I'm saying.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you annoyed you're going to miss all the action?
      If you do change your mind, start doing regular water fasts. Your old damaged tissue will be consumed and your stem cells will kick in.
      There's a reason why every age prolonging focused pharmaceutical company is researching drugs that mimic the effects of water fasting.
      Give them all the middle finger and just do the water fasts for free.

  5. The end of private spending by golgotha007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's also important to note that governments want this, too. They used to just have visibility on big number transactions but once all cash is gone, they'll be able to monitor every transaction, no matter how small. The concept of anonymous transactions and spending privacy will be soon be over.

    1. Re:The end of private spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are many times I will pay cash for things just because I know the merchant is going to slip the money in their pocket and not declare it to the government. It disgusts me the way the government wastes our tax money, so better in the hands of a small business person who is contributing a lot more to society.

      I also try to use cash at big stores (even though they pay their taxes) because the amount of data they can access about you just using your credit card info as a search index is terrifying.

    2. Re:The end of private spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also try to use cash at big stores (even though they pay their taxes) because the amount of data they can access about you just using your credit card info as a search index is terrifying.

      You should probably turn off your mobile phone before you enter the store, too. Just sayin'.

    3. Re:The end of private spending by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Yes, and they will tax EVERYTHING. The reason that private sales of used vehicles are taxed is because.... they know when the purchases happen because you have to title the vehicle with the government. So they ask you what you paid for it, and if the number you give them is too low then they use some market value for the vehicle year and mileage instead. I've always felt this is fundamentally against our rights as citizens as the vehicle was already taxed when it was sold new. A given vehicle could be taxed a dozen times if it was sold a dozen times. That is wrong.

      The one and only reason the government does not tax every private sale that occurs is because they have no way of knowing when they occur. Yesterday we bought a used pair of soccer cleats off a friend for $8 for our son to play soccer this season. They will tax that too when they can track that the money has been moved.

      This should scare the hell out of everyone.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    4. Re:The end of private spending by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Lucky you don't live here in Virginia where they tax your vehicle every damn year based upon the NADA value at 4.13%. This causes a large portion of the population to cheat with out of state tags. It also causes another large percentage to keep really old, highly polluting vehicles because they've been around long enough to no longer get taxed.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:The end of private spending by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Most states have vehicle sales tax and registration fees going to pay for their roads however the property tax on my home is for the public schools to bad I can't get a discount on those taxes for not having school age kids and as much as I pay the school system is still wanting.

      It's the private transactions like what you described and those for illegal goods that will keep cash around.

      If one day cash was suddenly gone and everything had to be done by traceable card transactions the civil upset would likely tear the country apart with in a year.

    6. Re:The end of private spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recently had a car mechanic who quite explicitly offer to remove sales tax, if I paid cash. Very tempting on a $1400 repair, but I was so used to paying with plastic that I simply forgot to bring the money when I picked up the car, and so I handed over my card and therefore had to pay tax anyway.

    7. Re: The end of private spending by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Public school taxes aren't to educate your kids. They are to fund an educated society. You are receiving that benefit as much as any of your neighbors.

    8. Re:The end of private spending by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      It won't 'soon be over' if everyone fights against it tooth and nail instead of just being passive sheep and accepting it.

    9. Re:The end of private spending by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      Being an advocate of digital, sovereign assets through crypto is a good start.

    10. Re:The end of private spending by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      No, sorry, I can't agree with that, not when at least 50% of all so-called 'cryptocurrency' is used for illegal things, and especially not when cryptocurrency exchanges are getting hacked into and drained practically daily, and by the way how is using cryptocurrency any different than paying for everything in U.S. currency electronically? It's really not, and even if you say it's not 'traceable' right now, it will be traceable as soon as the government can arrange that. No thanks, I like physical cash.

    11. Re:The end of private spending by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 1

      its good to go into a grocery or convenience store, pay with cash and buy a gallon of ice cream or really good chocolate candy bar. go home. eat it, and not have your life insurance company or medical insurance cancelled the following day, week or month for frivolous buying and consumption. okay, okay, i digress, maybe 10 gallons of ice cream in a year.

    12. Re:The end of private spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can be sure that there will be error in system with transactions of 'important' people, cause you know, damn data corruption, it happens all the time :)
      So no, anonymous transactions won't be over, there will be whole market to make your transaction 'anonymous'.

    13. Re:The end of private spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > at least 50% of all so-called 'cryptocurrency' is used for illegal things

      Blatantly false. Look at the markets, the actual investors, as with cash and gold, crypto is completely dominated by business and investment and retail and personal uses, all out in the open and in the news and metrics every single week. Not some darkweb pot dealers.

      > cryptocurrency exchanges are getting hacked into and drained practically daily

      It was your dumb ass who kept your funds on there instead of moving them off to your own private key secure storage or custody, and your dumb ass for patronizing uninsured and insecure companies.

      > how is using cryptocurrency any different than paying for everything in U.S. currency electronically?

      NOT your KEYS, NOT your MONEY.

      > traceable

      Zcash ZEC, Monero XMR, Wasabi Wallet, Bitcoin Cash BCH shuffle, BISQ, darknet exchanges, and more to come online this year.

      Get a fucking clue man, please.

    14. Re:The end of private spending by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Fuck off. I saw bitcoin as just a dumb fad and then as a tool for criminals and that's what it's turning out to be. Won't last, will get regulated by governments, transactions made traceable, just like all other financial transactions. Meanwhile you dumb asses are losing your shirts because it fluxuates even worse than the stock exchange. Screw that you can all be dumb all you want I'll have none of it.

    15. Re:The end of private spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should understand crypto and digital assets before you make comments about them. You're looking pretty stupid.

    16. Re:The end of private spending by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I think I understand quite enough.

  6. When you make the transaction frictionless.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reminds me of the following Ted talk - when you make the transaction frictionless, they've found you spend more

    When money isn’t real: the $10,000 experiment | Adam Carroll | TEDxLondonBusinessSchool

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VB39Jo8mAQ

    1. Re:When you make the transaction frictionless.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Exactly -- spending money SHOULD hurt like fuck. That way, people spend less money on frivolous shit they don't need anyway. Resist, drop out, buy used on Craigslist. Become part of the average perpetual-growth ecahhhhnamist's worst nightmares.

    2. Re:When you make the transaction frictionless.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly,

      But also remember 2008 when peoples credit card limits were cancelled/reduced or capped hard. Suddenly people walked out of shopping malls empty handed. Who would have thought, Every 14-18 years there is a bust.

      The unintended consequence of frictionless was shopping malls went broke/decayed and Amazon/walmart hoovered up jobs. Oh and the IRS wants more.Maybe we will go cashless, but it could also be an offshore AliPay account.

      Be careful what you wish for, Define frictionless marriage.

    3. Re:When you make the transaction frictionless.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but that's NOT how you reach enormous financial success.

      Saving money is BS with trivial interest rates and inflation.

      You are much better off by being vastly in debt - Not $10,000, or $20,000, but you want to borrow $200,000,000. With that, you stash enormous quantities of it where bankruptcy can't get it (bankruptcy can't take your house, whether it's a $10,000 hovel or a $100,000,000 mansion...) and then go bust - or at least re-negotiate with the banks, and pop - vast quantities of your debt just sort of go away.

      That's how to really make money. This 'put away a few bucks' idea may have flown in the 1950's, but that is very much old hat in today's banking world.

      AC

      PS - There's an old slogan that says "If you owe the bank $50,000 and can't pay, you're in trouble. If you owe the bank $50,000,000 and can't pay, the bank's in trouble." Which position would you rather be in?

      PPS - and don't get me started on the fun of hyperinflation. Pay off a billion-bolivar debt with a roll of toilet paper? Sign me up...

    4. Re:When you make the transaction frictionless.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TEDx talks aren't TED talks... Please don't call them that.

    5. Re:When you make the transaction frictionless.... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      What if you just want minor comfort? Buy a few duplex homes, pay them off ASAP, have someone else (tenants) paying your property taxes, health insurance, and basic needs. Not everyone's definition of success is extreme wealth -- some people just want to be left the hell alone and not be beholden to an employer.

  7. The cashless society is a mistake by Petersko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The cashless society is only of interest to that portion of the population with absolutely nothing to hide. And I donâ(TM)t trust those people even a little bit.

    No way to buy some mushrooms or hash... no hiding your hotel tryst from your spouse... no way to hide your alcohol abuse from your insurance company... if there isnâ(TM)t something you want to hide from prying eyes youâ(TM)re living life wrong.

    1. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Or the ones that do have something to hide -- but where the inconvenience of hiding purchases outweighs its benefit.

    2. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only solution is...

      Fully Distributed P2P Transaction Mineable Privacy Cryptocurrencies

      People, please, wake the fuck up.
      Cypherpunks and Voluntaryists are trying to help you.
      It's time you listen to them.

    3. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by sfcat · · Score: 1

      The cashless society is only of interest to that portion of the population with absolutely nothing to hide. And I donâ(TM)t trust those people even a little bit.

      No way to buy some mushrooms or hash... no hiding your hotel tryst from your spouse... no way to hide your alcohol abuse from your insurance company... if there isnâ(TM)t something you want to hide from prying eyes youâ(TM)re living life wrong.

      "If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." -- Cardinal Richelieu

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    4. Re: The cashless society is a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly this.

      Also, check which banknote gets printed the most. In my country, it's the largest denomination.

      Then ask: who uses them? Do you ever see them? Where are they? Where do they go?

      The columnist should start with those questions, not nickels and dimes in his pocket.

    5. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there isnâ(TM)t something you want to hide from prying eyes youâ(TM)re living life wrong.

      I do my best to hide the fact that my life is squeakily clean legally by committing as many questionable acts as possible.

    6. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drug abuse and affairs are not the product of a happy, balanced life.

      While there are many arguments for a cashless society, this is not one of them.

    7. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And I donâ(TM)t trust those people even a little bit.

      Funny, that's precisely what they say about people paying cash. What are you hiding? "I don't trust you since you're clearly doing drugs and dodging taxes, otherwise you wouldn't be paying cash."

      Side note: The only time these days I actually use cash is to pay a labourer who doesn't want to do the job on the books ...

    8. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there isn't something you want to hide from prying eyes you're living life wrong.

      That's very disturbing. There's something wrong with a faithful husband without addictions? I hope you have no real influence on people.

    9. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't trust people who don't go around being dishonest with their spouses or insurers?

      Interesting take on trust you have there.

    10. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      Saying that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is like saying that you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say.

    11. Re:The cashless society is a mistake by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "No way to buy some mushrooms or hash... no hiding your hotel tryst from your spouse... no way to hide your alcohol abuse from your insurance company"

      People will always want to hide some aspect of their life. That goes all the way to the top. That makes me feel relatively safe since nearly all politicians will want to keep that option open forever.

  8. "Why bother?" - The morons ask, blissfully? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the internet went out for 10 days, they were very, very bothered.

  9. Graham Cracker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Graham Cracker should shut his stinking yappah and disclose who's really paying him. Nice to be a pet whore/mouthpiece of the banksters and tech firms. Jefferson is probably rolling over in his grave.

  10. World View by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everyone only sees the world they want to see. I became a landlord a few years ago. It opened my eyes to the amount and types of people who don't or can't get debit or credit cards and that's ignoring all of the people who can't handling having a credit line. I would have otherwise never learned this type of information about people and would have continually falsely believed people had access to the same resources I had. How many random people do you go around asking about their financial history?

    The metric they're measuring is total cash transactions. That's doesn't include enough information to be useful. Is that 30% of the population only using cash or 1% only using cash and 29% sometimes using it? Perhaps that 70% are only buying a couple things at a time over and over where as the 30% cash purchases are buying two weeks worth of items at a time. Perhaps the majority of the cashless transaction are in cities. Etc... People will fill in the missing details with whatever they prefer to assume which makes all further claims dangerous to make decisions on.

    Personally I use cash at toll booths, bi-weekly on Craigslist, paying a friend / splitting costs, when the card readers aren't working, and when any total ends up matching an exact bill such as a $20. And sometimes I randomly pay in two dollar bills to screw with people.

  11. Not all millennials by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    What about all the same aged millennials who will still be under the poverty line, and will still be underserved by banks and credit card companies?
    Can't believe I'm saying this, but: check your privilege.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
    1. Re:Not all millennials by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Can't believe I'm saying this, but: check your privilege.

      Cash might be approaching an inflection point, but even the Boomers haven't paid with a check at retail since the Clinton administration.

    2. Re:Not all millennials by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      check your privilege

      Well, you won't be able to cash it anyway, so...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Not all millennials by jythie · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. the original piece is confusing hundreds of millions of people across a wide geographic area with a wide range of life situations with 'their friends'.

    4. Re:Not all millennials by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of merchants out there that charge 3% additional for credit. Off the top of my head, I have a storage unit, property taxes, and a lawn service that I pay through checks in order not to pay the extra charge. I had a plumber at my home just last week tell me it would be 3% extra for credit...check it was. Up through 2013, when my daughter was still in college, they wouldn't take VISA because of the extra fee. Does anyone pay a babysitter electronically?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:Not all millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of merchants out there that charge 3% additional for credit. Off the top of my head, I have a storage unit, property taxes, and a lawn service that I pay through checks in order not to pay the extra charge. I had a plumber at my home just last week tell me it would be 3% extra for credit...check it was. Up through 2013, when my daughter was still in college, they wouldn't take VISA because of the extra fee. Does anyone pay a babysitter electronically?

      Technically, aside from motor fuel providers, the Visa and Mastercard networks contractually prohibit the merchant from offering a discount for a cash payment. As such a merchant caught doing that will lose their ability to accept credit cards.

    6. Re:Not all millennials by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Boomer here, you're talking out your ass.

    7. Re:Not all millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got my first credit card as a college freshman with zero income. My credit union has a $1 minimum savings balance.
      I find it hard to believe that it's the banks deciding to not serve the poor.

    8. Re:Not all millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't believe I'm saying this, but: check your privilege.

      Cash might be approaching an inflection point, but even the Boomers haven't paid with a check at retail since the Clinton administration.

      I recently was stunned when the person in front of me paid for their groceries with a check. Had to scan the dates on the magazines in the checkout line rack, to make sure I hadn't accidentally time-travelled back to the '80s.

    9. Re:Not all millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks living in the US, doens't it? ;)

    10. Re:Not all millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, aside from motor fuel providers, the Visa and Mastercard networks contractually prohibit the merchant from offering a discount for a cash payment. As such a merchant caught doing that will lose their ability to accept credit cards.

      It's 2019 and this crap has been soundly defeated in the courts. Try to keep up.

  12. Sweden.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Sweden and just last week we talked at work about the problem with cash as people just don't recognize them (we changed bills 2 years ago and after that most people have only handled bills a few times, and rarely the big ones).
    And weeks ago I saw a father in his 30ths pay over 100dollars in groceries. I realized I hadn't seen anyone use cash for such a large amount in years. Here it's just 80+ and young criminals that keeps using cash

    1. Re:Sweden.. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Sad story.

    2. Re:Sweden.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Sweden is a sad story.

    3. Re:Sweden.. by Orphis · · Score: 1

      Cash is still useful in Sweden!

      Have you ever lost or had your wallet stolen? You need to save a little bit of cash for expenses just in case.
      Happened to me a couple years ago, I had my card skimmed just before Midsommar. The new one obviously didn't arrive in 2 working days and I needed to buy all the celebration necessities.

  13. Depends on how you define "world" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I really like remote places. I have been to a lot of them (Pitcairn Island, Cape Horn, the Austral Islands of French Polynesia, Palmyra Atoll, the Cook islands, etc.)

    There are still a lot of places that don't have cell service. The Internet (where it is available) can be very spotty. Sites like "microsoft.com" and "google.com" cannot be reliably located online (DNS errors.)

    These places deal in cold, hard cash.

    I did a deal in Uruguay that involved tens of thousands of dollars. The deal was all cash. Each side counted out hundred dollar bills in $1000 increments and grouped them in stacks of $10,000. All the money got counted twice. The transaction was completely legal. The U.S. $100 dollar bill is the genuine coin of the realm in Uruguay and Argentina. I don't care who you are, nobody is going to trust your smart phone for much over -maybe- $1000,

    I brought back (and declared) piles of hundred dollar bills through U.S. customs. The scrutiny was intense. But I got to keep my money.

    As far as the article goes, yeah, in metropolitan first world areas cash is less and less useful.

    Just as an aside, another remote place I like is Death Valley in California. Too bad every year somebody dies because they think that their smart phone will save them when they have gone too far into the back country unprepared. But...hey...at least they didn't need cash!

    1. Re:Depends on how you define "world" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even in urban areas you need cash. Only in hipster areas do they accept phone payments. Other places certainly take credit or debit cards but cash is more convenient and easier to budget with.

    2. Re:Depends on how you define "world" by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      What do you need cash for in urban areas other than paying your dealer and buying something from someone you found on craigslist?

    3. Re:Depends on how you define "world" by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      When I grew up the rule of thumb (and sometimes store policy) was no credit cards for anything under $20. So fast food restaurants, ice cream stores, a quick run to the drug store. If you balance your accounts, or try to keep a budget, getting paperwork for each and every misc purchase is a lot of work.

    4. Re:Depends on how you define "world" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you need cash for in urban areas other than paying your dealer and buying something from someone you found on craigslist?

      Parking meters. Parking garages. Munchies and drinks at the local low cost movie house. Library fines. Governmental payments, at least in Texas, all parts of gov't accept credit cards but charge an extra 2.7% for the convenience; no way I'm charging $15,000 in property taxes to have an extra $405 added.

    5. Re:Depends on how you define "world" by nealric · · Score: 1

      Really? I find cash much harder to budget with. With electronic payments, what I spent money on is immediately logged into my statement. I can pull up and see how much I spent on groceries, or fuel, or whatever rather than just knowing I spent $XX.

  14. They don't count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Check your privilege" is something a certain class of people will say with gay abandon, but will never listen to when someone else says the same to them. It works the same with slut-shaming. The shamer probably fucks around way more than the shamee, but pointing that out doesn't work for some reason. The point therefore is simply to put the recipient of the verbal lashing back in their place. It's a social class (or should I say caste?) thing.

    The underserved, the unbankable, the deplorables, the untouchables, however you call them, they're so far down the social ladder that they're not a blip on the speaker's radar. They simply don't count.

    Anyway, vapid article writer is vapid. I don't have a credit card, can't get one, wouldn't want one if I could. And that's a "western" country. By that definition I'm "underserved". So you too can safely disregard this comment, since I don't count either.

  15. Re:Millennials Will Live To See a Cashless World.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they'll see that world with their artificial eye-balls, installed and purchased by the power of their universal health care plans so that they can verify the payments and make sure their $20 coffee doesn't costs $2000 "by accident" even when they are old. Oh wait, they are planning to never get old and weak.

  16. The end of private property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bourgeois will not live to see a propertyless world.

  17. Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by tanstaaf1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Talk about what the banks don't want you to even think about: Use of Credit and Debit cards adds an enormous additional cost to the merchant and, ultimately, to the consumer -- usually just shy of 5%. The conversion to cashless isn't being done to help the citizen, that is for sure. Help the consumer out of their money and their privacy? Of course. Control the consumer? Absolutely. And the dumber than dumb Millennial generation can't put two brain cells together to figure it out. Cui bono?

    1. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about what the banks don't want you to even think about: Use of Credit and Debit cards adds an enormous additional cost to the merchant and, ultimately, to the consumer -- usually just shy of 5%.

      BS. The fees are 2-3% for credit cards, and much less for debit, typically 20-50 cents.

    2. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that electronic payments in the US are done by the credit card processors. In other countries we use EFTPOS which is superior, and the money is transferred directly from your bank account to the merchant, and no stupid credit card (visa, mastercard) fees.

    3. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter what the fuck the rate is.
      It's still a COMPLETELY FUCKING USELESS *** TAX *** ON YOUR ASS.
      How much you spend a month??? $1000 - $3000 ?
      That's like $100 a month straight to some FUCKING BANK for NOTHING.
      Now how many dinners you can buy for homeless charity with that?
      Enough to make a difference.

      Know how much it costs for a Bitcoin Cash BCH transaction???
      FIVE FUCKING CENTS !!!
      And it works on your phone with your buddies right now today.
      Search Youtube: bitcoin.com

      Now you FUCKING TELL ME how much food for charity all that GODDAMNED TRILLION dollers spent EVERY YEAR on WAR for the last 20 FUCKING YEARS would have bought.

      You DO NOT need anyone in your money but yourself.
      FUCK the fees, FUCK the taxes, FUCK it all.
      Adopt Cryptocurrency right fucking now and do it all your goddamned self !!!

    4. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude calm down, taxes aren't that big of a deal.

      roads and schools are cool!

    5. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Well, that 20 cents can come out to more than 5% for a $4 purchase.

    6. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BCH? SV or ABC? Even BCH SV doesn't have the throughput to match Visa, let alone replace all the CC companies. Maybe it will once they move to 2TB block sizes? That's going to be pretty goony though. BCH and BTC both suffer from centralization of mining under existing PoW protocols, and it's only going to get worse.

    7. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Orphis · · Score: 1

      If a merchant is paying 5%, then they should change payment processor.
      I help some small association from time to time, we have a card reader and the entry level fee is only 1.85%. It's probably lowered if you have high volumes of payments too.

      And that's 1.85% to get all the services, including getting a certified "cash" register for the tax agencies in the country. No real cash in there, but that's the terminology of payment devices, even if it's just a small add-on to a phone.

    8. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you fail to understand that advances in cryptocurrency tech will solve scaling issues.
      bitcoin btc was first gen 10 years old.
      the new stuff coming from the crypto movement is amazing.

    9. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sum total of all taxes fees etc eat 50% of your earnings.
      Half of that goes to murder and war.
      Another quarter to useless bullshit.

      The rest, like roads, and especially schools, fire, police, insurance... you can pay for all that much more efficiently and directly together in your communities and with others. No need to be a thief and steal from others at gunpoint to get what you want. That's a mortal sin.
      You want research, walls, arts, whatever... pay the ones you want directly with crypto.

    10. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Use of Credit and Debit cards adds an enormous additional cost to the merchant and, ultimately, to the consumer -- usually just shy of 5%.

      No. Use of credit cards add 5%. Use of debit cards add almost nothing. Abolishing cash on the other hand saves a shitton. You don't think handling, counting, trips to the bank, float management, safety, and security come for free do you?

      There's a reason that *businesses* are the ones pushing to go cashless and it's not because they like paying fees.

    11. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a merchant is paying 5%, then they should change payment processor.
      I help some small association from time to time, we have a card reader and the entry level fee is only 1.85%. It's probably lowered if you have high volumes of payments too.

      And that's 1.85% to get all the services, including getting a certified "cash" register for the tax agencies in the country. No real cash in there, but that's the terminology of payment devices, even if it's just a small add-on to a phone.

      Thats 1.85% for a standard non-reward, non-vendor card, which today is very rare. I pay 2.05% for reward/vendor cards, 2.95% for Amex plus the transaction fee, in my case 5 cents every time I use the network. Swipe a card 5 cents. Swipe card and it is declined 5 cents. And don't forget the monthly statement fees which get taken whether not you have transactions.

      Minimum charge for me is $15 per month with zero transactions.

    12. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Debit card transactions cost the merchant as well and it isn't almost nothing.

      If you know an owner of a small business, go ask them. They might be nice enough to tell you their costs.

      I am a gamer and for years we didn't have a gaming store in town. When one opened about 6 years ago, I started going there all of the time. I talked with the business owner as I have gotten to know him over the years He told me about the fees and how about 3% of his profits are lost due to transaction fees. While debit card fees are lower, they are not almost nothing.

      If I know I am going to the game store, I stop by an ATM and get cash and pay with cash. If it is a spur of the moment drop buy and buy something, I will end up using a card as there are no convenient ATMs to the store and I don't normally carry cash.

      Using the convenient pays methods cost the merchant extra money and they have to pass those costs on to the consumer. If we all went back to cash, those fees would disappear and the "cost" of dealing with cash would be on the consumer as the cost to a business to dealing with cash is smaller then the credit card fees.

    13. Re:Cashless comes with an additional 5% Bank TAX by tepples · · Score: 1

      If a merchant is paying 5%, then they should change payment processor.
      I help some small association from time to time, we have a card reader and the entry level fee is only 1.85%.

      Plus how much per transaction? I ask on behalf of merchants that do most of their business in transactions under $10.

  18. Cash is king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cashless society has been promoted since I was a kid, mostly by the credit card companies. Cash will always be king.

    It's worse than the few percent. The merchant doesn't immediately get the money, it's delayed. The credit card isn't really giving you credit, its the merchant that is via the delayed payment to the merchant. They have to fund the credit.

    There's a few really really bad middleman systems. For example, delivery services like FoodPanda. They charge the merchant 30% of the bill which the merchant isn't allowed to bill the end customer for, they charge you for delivery to make it seem like you're paying the delivery charge and to top it all off they pay the merchant with a delay too. If the restaurant has a delivery service, use that, pay directly in cash, they'll have the money immediately and it will be real usable money. Cash is king.

    Similarly the hotel booking sites do a mass of scams. Showing listings for cheap hotels they don't book as 'unavailable' to make you think the cheap hotel is sold out, so that you book a more expensive hotel with them. Typically the listing has incorrect contact details to prevent you calling the hotel direct. Agoda are probably the worst here. Find a hotel, search their website, book them direct, pay at the desk. Over time you'll increase their profits and help cut one more scammy middleman from the deal.

    Cash works everywhere. Ever had a credit card declined? Imagine you're dependent on that card... you're at the mercy of Visa.

    Find a restaurant that doesn't take cash? Eat elsewhere. There's more customers than restaurants in the world, they're competing for your cash.

    1. Re: Cash is king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Was chatting to a hotel manager the other day about Expedia. She told me they often wait up to 3 months after the customer has been and gone to get paid for the stay.

    2. Re: Cash is king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet these businesses CHOOSE to use these middlemen and systems because.... some ingrained need to be compassionate? Clearly they are losing money but are really mad they can't write it off not only as an expense but also a donation.

    3. Re:Cash is king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The credit card isn't really giving you credit, its the merchant that is via the delayed payment to the merchant. They have to fund the credit.

      Uhm, wrong! Credit cards give you credit in that you don't have to pay more than the minimum amount when the bill comes.

    4. Re: Cash is king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many businesspeople are as lazy as they are greedy.

    5. Re: Cash is king by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Find what the hotel costs on Expedia. Offer 10% less in cash, with a card for security/incidentals. Profit. Works nicely for smaller motels at least.

    6. Re: Cash is king by reanjr · · Score: 1

      In most cases, businesses are forced into the status quo. You can't run a hotel business and hope to not accept guests through such middlemen. That's how the consumers shop.

    7. Re: Cash is king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA is not the world
      In Sweden society is already pretty much cashless

    8. Re: Cash is king by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Even if they paid the same day, the aggregator (Expedia, etc) gets their cut off the top. It's more profit to the hotel if you book direct, and the price to you can be lower. You're paying a lot for the convenience of Expedia or Booking.com.

  19. "But for how long?" by sheramil · · Score: 1

    As long as drug dealers want to avoid having to explain all those five hundred dollar transactions done between 2:00 am and 5:00 am.

  20. ALWAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will always be physical objects to trade for goods and services. ALWAYS. Having cash is the only way to keep things simple, consistent and stable. Why would you want to go back in time to pay for things with 3 goats?

  21. Smug by hedge00 · · Score: 2

    Why does this columnist seem so damn smug about the prospect of losing a convenient payment option that has no middleman taking a cut?

    1. Re:Smug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're fucking stupid if you think "CASH" has no "middleman" or "cut".
      Lemme skip all the little fucking costs and systems involved.
      Here's the three biggies...
      INFLATION... flat out money printing
      BANKS... flat out thin air money creation through "loans"
      GOVT DEBT... flat out theft of all that air

      There's a reason Gold and Cryptocurrencies are dumped on by Govts, Banks, and Corporations... they FUCKING HATE the shit because it's REAL FUCKING MONEY they can't control or steal.

    2. Re: Smug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of that has anything to do with cash transactions.

      Yes, inflation will hit you if you hoard cash, but that's about it.

    3. Re:Smug by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Probably a shill for the financial industry.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re:Smug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm a tech columnist! That means I have a SMARTPHONE!! Look at all the cool, hip and modern things I'm doing as a TECH COLUMNIST with my SMARTPHONE!!!"

      Yeah, what a piece of shit. I don't trust any "tech columnist" who places this much blind and implicit trust in modern technology. It shows he hasn't been doing his job adequately.

    5. Re:Smug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't see a reason to be smug about it, options are good aren't they? But cash isn't really convenient unless that is all you have, and while there may be no middleman, there are still costs to handling cash.

  22. Cryptocurrency is the ONLY way to FREEDOM !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CAPS required to get through thick Govt and Corp programmed skulls since birth :)

    Not to mention roughly 4% transaction fees.
    And TOTAL UP YOUR ASS TAX MAN 24x365 DATAMINING SURVEILLANCE SPYING probing for that apple pie and coolaid your kids "sold" from the driveway.
    Or the little SIDE JOB you do for your neighbors.
    Constant CONTROL CHECKPOINTING and GATEKEEPING over your life.
    And the IMMEDIATE and TOTAL SHUTDOWN of your ENTIRE LIFE when the powers FUCK UP or decide they dont like you.

    Cashless is a HUGE FUCKING MISTAKE.

    If you want "cashless", the REAL SOLUTION is... CRYPTOCURRENCY. Specifically the ONLY type that will save your ass, that is...

    Fully Distributed P2P Transaction Mineable Privacy Cryptocurrencies.

    - You keep your own keys, subject to whatever % of wealth you want to leave insured in Corp/Gov/Bank custody subject to their OFF SWITCH, CONFISCATION and outright THEFT whenever they want money.
    - You run a transaction miner and block relay in your basement attached to the smallest pools to guarantee no 51%.
    - You send direct person to person over fully encrypted connections and anonymization networks.

    Zcash.io ZEC is very good privacy coin, Bitcoin Cash BCH just added some privacy.
    And in the next five years, MANY quality coins will be fully private, and MUCH MORE ADVANCED with no huge blockchain storage, only the UTXO set.

    But if you don't use
    Fully Distributed P2P Transaction Mineable Privacy Cryptocurrencies,
    and don't uphold the philosophical responsibilities that come with it,
    then you are NO BETTER OFF than using Fiat Shitcoins and taking it up the ass forever.

    NOW IS YOUR CHANCE FOR REAL FREEDOM... economic, social, political... everything.
    THIS ONLY COMES AROUND ONCE IN HUNDREDS OF YEARS.

    You MUST ADOPT
    Fully Distributed P2P Transaction Mineable Privacy Cryptocurrencies

    Else it's all for naught and you will have consigned yourself and your entire future family unto SLAVERY FOREVER.

    Search: Voluntaryism, Libertarianism, Anarchapulco, Mark Passio, Larken Rose, Jeffrey Tucker, Patrick Byrne, Roger Ver, Keith Knight, Gavin Seim, John McAfee, Free State Project Liberty Forum, etc...

    Free your mind, LEARN, create your freedom.
    You DO NOT need all this GOVT CORPORATE BANK BULLSHIT and MIND PROGRAMMING SLAVERY to them.
    You can do EVERYTHING that needs done in life BY YOURSELVES working VOLUNTARILY TOGETHER.
    END THE CYCLE OF KINGS RULERS GOVT WARS THEFT MURDER.

    MONEY is the ONLY power GAME now, not Voting, not Speech, none of that fairy rigged up lip service bullshit.
    WAKE the FUCK UP.
    Cryptocurrency is the ONLY way to FREEDOM !!!
    You either have it and use it or you lose.

    1. Re:Cryptocurrency is the ONLY way to FREEDOM !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought about $500 of each of the top 10 mineable cryptos last month. My first ever buy. I didn't trust the non mineable ones because it seemed the companies behind them would be kindof in the middle. This was easy once I learned that I can always trade them for whatever decentralized coins are looking good in the future. I plan to adjust allocation about once every six months... you know, just to follow the long term trend since I figure only 10 or so will be the ones 10 years out.
      I also bought a lot of Bitcoin Cash BCH, only because I discovered quite a few places in my city where I could spend and replace.

      I know people will hate you for your post, but what you write is true.

      I've been watching crypto for many years, now I'm in it for the long haul, and I am absolutely certain it's the right move, and for many of the reasons you mention.
      Thanks for posting, I hope others see the light.

  23. About the same time as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the world economy crashes because:

    Rampant hacking
    Rampant 'taxation' by one and all

  24. It IS a mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because, as we will soon see in China (or won't, because it will be done covertly, until they need to make an example), all those micropayments people can watch for will allow them to track any purchases going towards protest supplies, unapproved reading materials, or even something mundane, like chemicals. (Ever tried to buy large quantities of lye in the US? Yeah, imagine that for EVERYTHING you could purchase, no matter how small and otherwise mundane.)

    If we allow a truly cashless society to happen, we will be as chained as the africans, indians, and european debtor servants were during the colonial to civil war era america, only this time people won't understand the chains that bind them because they will be too removed from their immediate surroundings. Chains biting into your wrists and a whip or crop biting into your back make it easy to remember who is holding you down. Even living in the wrong part of town and having the cops treat you as less than human. But what about when it becomes whether or not you have money? Fellow wage slaves will simply look down on you as unsuccessful, rather than considering your plight, and how close they are teetering to it becoming their own.

    1. Re:It IS a mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Lye? I mean, sure, Breaking Bad and Person of Interestand Dexter and all that yada...

      But NaOH is a stock base for any lab/hackerspace/hobbyist, and a generally useful household item. Note that there are already required reporting lists for many chemicals, all of which start at limits so high, you won't have anything short of an industrial use for them...which has its own laws on reporting.

    2. Re:It IS a mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Tennessee. You have to sign papers to be tracked for buying just a pound of the stuff in-state. Most places just stop stocking the stuff. Gotta do the same for just a single box of sudafed. Buy too many boxes in 6 months or from 3 different stores within a week or so and the cops pay a visit. Meth junkies fuck it up for everyone. I'm not happy about any of it. My wife makes soap. You can get around some of the rules by buying it online but big bottles still get registered like you mention.

  25. The end to bankruns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't take your money out of the bank then banks cannot be called on their "fractional reserve" bluff, and bankruns cannot happen. Even better, governments can just force you to "take a haircut" should the friendly gang of neighbourhood bankers fuck up again. What that eurogroup guy called "the cyprus template". No money in socks under the mattress for you.

    1. Re: The end to bankruns by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

      Yes and now. Whilst it would end the bankruns of popular memory, the 2008 crisis saw more subtle versions where banks were refused access to the interbank market with equally disastrous consequences.

  26. Millenials will also see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the collapse of civilization, mass migration, wars, starvation, fires, floods, super-hurricanes etc
    Cash won't be any good then, barter only for the survivors of climate change

  27. Prediction fail by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's how you predict things correctly:

    1. Start with things as they are
    2. Predict they will change only a little.

    That's how you get correct predictions. Nobody wants to publish them though.

    The big changes that would be interesting enough to publish in an article are too few. You won't guess them.

    1. Re:Prediction fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better way:

      2. Predict things will change a little both ways.
      3. When things change, trumpet the prediction that you got right, and let everyone else forget that you also made the other prediction.

      AC

    2. Re:Prediction fail by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'll bite:

      1. Start with things as they are

      A portion of stores I do business with are cashless.
      I haven't carried cash on me in years.
      All supermarkets I go to have cash free lanes with the option of a few select slow lines where I pay cash.
      I transfer money and split bills between my friends with my phone.
      I am a millennial.

      2. Predict they will change only a little.

      Abolishing the few remaining cash lanes changes things a little.
      The remaining businesses not already cashless going cashless changes things a little.
      I will remain a millennial so that doesn't change.

      Sounds like a pretty solid and realistic prediction to me, I'm less than a quarter in to my life and I've seen the world shift in very dramatic ways to cashless transactions to the point where finding a business that doesn't support cashless transactions (including small stuff like buying a coffee from a food van standing outside a festival) is an incredibly oddity. It stands to reason that cash will disappear from this world before I do (accidents or sudden medical interventions not withstanding).

    3. Re:Prediction fail by Kohath · · Score: 1

      A portion of stores I do business with are cashless. ...
      All supermarkets I go to have cash free lanes with the option of a few select slow lines where I pay cash.

      What country? Not the US.

    4. Re:Prediction fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abolishing the few remaining cash lanes changes things a little.
      The remaining businesses not already cashless going cashless changes things a little.

      It doesn't change things a little it changes them substantially. You may not care but as others have pointed out some of us care. A store that doesn't accept cash is a store I don't buy at. Even if occasionally I pay with my card (debit, never credit) directly at a store, that is the exception not the rule. So if the store suddenly has no one I can talk to and pay to, I'm out. And I've done so before.
      I was born in the 1980s, I'm not sure my peers think as I do, but I don't want to pay with my card. And when outside the country it's substantially more expensive to pay with card, as my bank charges a commission on every payment. If I'm paying dinner it may be fine to add a dollar or two. But if I'm paying for a bus ticket, I don't want to double the price for the convenience of not handling cash.

    5. Re:Prediction fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All supermarkets I go to have cash free lanes with the option of a few select slow lines where I pay cash.

      I call shenanigans.

      When people select lines they consider the amount of shit in the baskets of the people in front of them. Nobody ever says oh shit that person is paying in cash. I've been held up more by people paying with credit/debit cards entering their pin codes or wanting "cash back" then I have ever been held up by cash buyers. The only thing worse are check writers.

      Abolishing the few remaining cash lanes changes things a little.

      Never seen a cash line inside of any store ever in my entire life. If they exist at all and lines are bigger it's because more people want to pay in cash not because the line moves slower you idiot. Sorry for calling you an idiot but you are constantly calling other people here names so fuck it if the label fits wear it. Segregating lines by pay method is a piss poor business practice if I ever heard of one.

    6. Re:Prediction fail by tepples · · Score: 1

      I transfer money and split bills between my friends with my phone.

      How much does use of your phone away from home and open hotspots cost you per month? How much does use of the current account (also called a checking account or demand deposit account) cost you per month?

      I've seen the world shift in very dramatic ways to cashless transactions to the point where finding a business that doesn't support cashless transactions (including small stuff like buying a coffee from a food van standing outside a festival) is an incredibly oddity.

      The price of the coffee probably already shot up to cover the fee of 30 cents per transaction that the bank charges to process credit or debit transactions.

  28. Crashless society by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let's see you buy an 8-ball of crystal meth with a credit card or Apple Pay. You think Robert Kraft is slapping down his Discover Card when he goes to the Chinese rub'n'tug to get his egg roll dipped in sweet and sour?

    Do you think that when the human trafficking owner of that Chinese rub'n'tug sells access to Donald Trump that they're taking credit card payments?

    Fuck no. There somebody, somewhere, with a wad of currency. As it will ever be.

    And no, I'm not making any of the above up:

    https://nymag.com/intelligence...

    https://www.rawstory.com/2019/...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Crashless society by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Obviously not. They don't take Discover -- Mastercard and Visa only. But you get a couple egg rolls free from the attached restaurant, because you're such a good customer.

    2. Re:Crashless society by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Troll

      Always find a way, no matter how tenuous, to link whatever the current article is to Trump. This is Trump Derangement Syndrome. -1 Offtopic.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Crashless society by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Always find a way, no matter how tenuous, to link whatever the current article is to Trump. This is Trump Derangement Syndrome

      It's gonna be this way until that degenerate is safely out of office, so get used to it. Just relax and enjoy the ride, sweetheart.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  29. No way by fred911 · · Score: 1

    Millennials can't buy everything they want without cash and I doubt that the intolerance precludes those purchases will leave as quickly as the availability to be 100% cashless arrives.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  30. He may be right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the population growing like an algae bloom in a pond (which leads to inevitable extinction in the pond) and the environmental destruction being done, it is an almost foregone conclusion that humanity will be extinct within the normal lifetime of millennials. Of course that will put an end to cash. But if through some slim miracle there are still people on this planet in 60 years, there will be cash.

  31. Itâ(TM)s been predicted long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Revelation 13:16-18 (NLT) 16 He required everyone--small and great, rich and poor, free and slave--to be given a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. 17 And no one could buy or sell anything without that mark, which was either the name of the beast or the number representing his name. 18 Wisdom is needed here. Let the one with understanding solve the meaning of the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666.

  32. Well, they'll be comfortable with it. by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

    Gen X is the last generation that remembers what it was to live disconnected, and when we die out, nobody will know better.

  33. The fun of a cashless world by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your CC comes with a new political code of conduct.
    Any gov assistance program gets a new long no buy list.
    No gambling, no drugs, no alcohol, no smoking.
    A bank account will be needed.
    Detection of illegal migrants and other criminals trying to use a fake ID.
    Social media use gets linked back to a cashless account and all spending is tracked.
    Cash gave a person the spending power to enjoy freedoms away from big gov and the politics of a bank, CC. A cashless world returns all spending to a bank, CC.
    Buy the wrong book? The wrong comment on an ISP account linked to your a cashless account?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:The fun of a cashless world by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      So why are Millennials giving this all up for the convenience of cashless transactions?

    2. Re:The fun of a cashless world by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Banks and CC brands make it trendy and low cost at first to get consumers spreading the good news about the "free" cashless services offered.
      Then the banks and CC brands up the fees and costs on every movement of money once a nation is captive on their "cashless" services.
      Wage goes in? Thats a new cost.
      Shopping? Thats going to be an account cost.
      Buy a political book? Thats a review of the account and loss of an account due to a new CoC?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:The fun of a cashless world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, they think it's a good way to force conservatives into their brave new world that's been tried and failed so many times before, but they're too young and naive to see the dangers. Being young and naive forever is what makes them millennials.

  34. Cardless society by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    My prediction in the not too distant future the use of credit cards for transactions will be greatly diminished. Instead people will use bank tied "push" payment systems for electronic payment without transaction fees.

    Cash will still be widely used and smartphone based payment systems (Apple Pay, Samsung Pay, Google Pay, ad nausea) will be phased out entirely.

    1. Re:Cardless society by tepples · · Score: 1

      bank tied "push" payment systems for electronic payment without transaction fees.

      Who will pay for the servers, electric power, datacenter space, and network connections to keep these fee-free "push" payment systems running?

  35. Re:It's been predicted long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decentralized Cryptocurrency is the Only way out, the True Path of Freedom to the Saviour.
    All other paths lead to the Slavery enforced by that Beast.
    Do Not Fall Slave to that Evil which Infests Governments and Banks and their so called money systems.

  36. wrong motivation cited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not "Banks and credit card companies want this to curb the costs of handling green"

    but rather "Banks and credit card companies want this to charge for every fucking transaction regardless of how pissy small the amount is"

    and of course, so they can have a record for all eternity (a hackable, exploitable, and government infiltrated, record) of what you bought, used or paid for, where and when and for how much and from whom.

    we CAN fight this. we MUST fight this.

  37. Communism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally everyone agrees capitalism sucks

  38. DO NOT DO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    A cashless society gives TOTAL control to government. If this happens it will be eventually be abused.The other day it became known that the Trump administration has been tracking journalists. Should Trump seize even more power, how hard it is to imagine he might freeze the assets of those journalists from "fake news" outlets as he likes to call them. Just one very easily imagined scenario where this could be abused. Next election Right Wing Christians take control? Maybe they will prevent funds from being transferred to pay for abortion. I could go on and on but the abuse is easy to imagine yourself. And that's not even considering the tracking power of a cashless society.

    1. Re:DO NOT DO!!! by dcw3 · · Score: 0

      "Just one very easily imagined scenario...blah, blah, blah"

      You probably have dreams of Trump butt fucking your mom and believe that's an easily imagined scenario as well. Right snowflake.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  39. Call me back when you kill checks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me back when checks actually get killed, which is a simpler problem to solve (the payer has a bank account, and the payee either has a bank account, a place to cash checks, or endorses checks over to someone else). Even when most people write few if any checks, there are still some transactions that can only be done with a check (or cash), and some transactions where you are given a check (no direct deposit). Even at jobs with direct deposit, there are still some employers who can't get your direct deposit started fast enough and pay your first payday with a paper check.

    Cash is also nice to have during power outages or more frequently, payment processing system outages.

  40. Cash competition limits credit card fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the market share may fluctuate, one important thing cash does is limit the fees that banks can get away with.

    We've all seen Apple decide that they're entitled to 30% of all transactions, because they've made sure there's no alternative. Any time there's no alternative, a middleman starts monopoly pricing.

    But as long as cash is around, credit card fees can't deviate too far from cash-handling costs.

  41. apple/samsung pay is cumbersome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use it sometimes but it just isn't as easy or straightforward as using a credit card.

  42. Totalitarian Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With no cash just consider that all cashless services like bank accounts, credit cards and PayPal are easily frozen. Until recently you only had to cross government to be frozen out, but now the cashless corporations are acting on there own to freeze people. With no access to payment methods you would be forced to commit crimes to just survive.

  43. If i need to spend 0.02$, i still use a card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .

    When i visit America, its like traveling 20 years back in time, because you need to have cash.

    1. Re: If i need to spend 0.02$, i still use a card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just spent a week in The Netherlands, it's the same there. So backwards.

  44. Makes it easy to tax everything. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Finally, Uncle Sam will be getting in on all that unreported allowance action.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:Makes it easy to tax everything. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You joke, but kids won't be able to babysit or mow lawns unless they register a company and pay taxes on the income. It's coming, just wait.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Makes it easy to tax everything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you the joke. Cash isn't going away and anyone dumb enough to think it will is probably too rich to know how to survive when money has no value anyway. You'll simply be bludgeoned by the mob at that point. Internet required?

      What if the internet goes out for a week, then you're fucked society-wide.

  45. Navie at Best, so Just Say No! by SemperOSS · · Score: 2

    I will give this guy the benefit of doubt and just label him naive.

    There are so many reasons for having cash, from simple convenience to privacy. I like the fact that I can literally throw money on the counter/table if I am in a hurry (has happened a few times in my life).

    Also, it will be the end of most beggars, I believe, as I cannot see them accepting card payments soon (Thank you kind Ma'am, would you like a receipt?). Similarly for sellers of The Big Issue (a UK magazine sold by homeless people). A lot of other charity will be stopped dead in its tracks when people cannot just grab some money and give it in a quick transaction. What about the big tanks in the airports where people can leave money for charities, can anybody imagine those replaced with card readers? Me neither.

    As other have said, we are walking into the ultimate surveillance society where no transaction goes unregistered, which obviously is the card companies', the tax man's, the police's, the intelligence communities' and the government's wet dream.

    Just say NO!

    --
    I don't need a signature to draw attention to myself.
    1. Re:Navie at Best, so Just Say No! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      He's not "just" naive. He wrote an article about it for USA Today and received money for doing it. That makes him a paid shill.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    2. Re:Navie at Best, so Just Say No! by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      He could be naive, but I'm betting the financial industry is pushing for cashless, and would love their minions to do so as well. They'll make a percentage of the cut, along with another percentage selling off your personal data.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    3. Re:Navie at Best, so Just Say No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have clearly never been to China. Beggars will happily accept electronic payments.

  46. Back to the Future by Hairy1 · · Score: 1

    Dear United States. New Zealand has had EFTPOS for years and years. Stands for Electronic Funds Transfer at Point of Sale. It is not a credit card, in that it is attached to your bank account. Getting out cash is now quite rare. It isn't strictly cashless; we still have cash, but the overwhelming majority of point of sale transactions are performed by EFTPOS. There is a small fee to the merchant for each transaction, but not the silly percentage based approach used by the credit card people. So entrenched is EFTPOS that we have rejected the 'paywave' system which sought to undermine it and reintroduce abhorrent transaction fees just for the 'convenience' of not entering your pin number.

    1. Re:Back to the Future by will_die · · Score: 1

      With it being linked to your bank account and not globally accepted as major credit cards how do they handle tourists?

    2. Re:Back to the Future by avandesande · · Score: 1

      We have debit cards in the US the work the same way, but credit card companies have been incentivizing consumers to use their cards instead with cash back or other promotions. Our local Kroger subsidiary is no longer taking Visa in April due to high fees....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  47. Police will have an easy job by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As soon as "cashless" becomes a reality, police won't have to lift a finger to arrest anyone accused of a crime. They'll just turn off his phone. The suspect will turn himself in to avoid starvation.

    That's the good part of police states. Petty crime virtually disappears. The bad part is that the definition of "crime" expands so far as to encompass anyone who does something the rulers don't like. We're already seeing people being denied financial services like Paypal, Patreon, and even bank accounts simply because they speak their opinions in public. It's a new, terrifying level of control and since corporations control it instead of government, it's doing a nice job of boiling the frog.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Police will have an easy job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah stealing food is impossible, great thinking.

    2. Re:Police will have an easy job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to examine the structure of cash itself. We've banned everything over $100 in bills because organized crime. We've passed laws that make you suspicious if you carry too much (too many bills will set off a metal detector at the airport.) We still have all the cents. Due to inflation, these currencies become worth less every year. $100 50 years ago was a decent chunk of change, 100 years ago it was a month's pay. We aren't doing what the rest of modern society is doing and getting rid of the tiny fractional currency and adding in more valuable bills at the back end. Of course it will get more expensive to handle cash!! Change below 10 cents is hardly worth the time it takes for the low paid cashier to dole out.

    3. Re:Police will have an easy job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way out are
      Fully Distributed P2P Transaction Mineable Privacy Cryptocurrencies

      People, please, wake the fuck up.
      Cypherpunks and Voluntaryists are trying to help you.
      It's time you listen to them!

    4. Re:Police will have an easy job by nasch · · Score: 1

      We're already seeing people being denied financial services like Paypal, Patreon, and even bank accounts simply because they speak their opinions in public.

      Meaning specific companies have decided not to do business with a specific customer, or the government has decided that a person is not allowed to have a bank account? Because those are very different things.

    5. Re:Police will have an easy job by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      As soon as "cashless" becomes a reality, police won't have to lift a finger to arrest anyone accused of a crime. They'll just turn off his phone. The suspect will turn himself in to avoid starvation.

      Yes because "cashless" is an all encompassing word that not only hands police powers they don't have, but also implies the specific solution to replace cash is to use a phone, and naturally why would you stop there when you could just add a slippery slope fallacy to properly round out your post.

      I guess moderators gave you +insightful because Slashdot doesn't have "incredibly stupid" as a moderation option.

    6. Re:Police will have an easy job by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      If the government and businesses are working together, not that much different.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re:Police will have an easy job by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      We're already seeing people being denied financial services like Paypal, Patreon, and even bank accounts simply because they speak their opinions in public.

      Meaning specific companies have decided not to do business with a specific customer, or the government has decided that a person is not allowed to have a bank account? Because those are very different things.

      "Citizen committees" with baseball bats and armed government agents are very different things too, in theory ... just not always in practice.

    8. Re:Police will have an easy job by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      As soon as "cashless" becomes a reality, police won't have to lift a finger to arrest anyone accused of a crime. They'll just turn off his phone. The suspect will turn himself in to avoid starvation.

      Yes because "cashless" is an all encompassing word that not only hands police powers they don't have,

      They don't? They already freeze bank accounts.

      but also implies the specific solution to replace cash is to use a phone,

      The pocket computer than approximately everyone carries, and that people are already using for digital cash? Yeah, that's just crazy talk (and also not super relevant to his point, but whatever)

      and naturally why would you stop there when you could just add a slippery slope fallacy to properly round out your post.

      The slope we are already tobogganing down ... hitting the odd "deplatforming" tree on the way ...

    9. Re:Police will have an easy job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as "cashless" becomes a reality, police won't have to lift a finger to arrest anyone accused of a crime. They'll just turn off his phone. The suspect will turn himself in to avoid starvation.

      That's the good part of police states. Petty crime virtually disappears. The bad part is that the definition of "crime" expands so far as to encompass anyone who does something the rulers don't like. We're already seeing people being denied financial services like Paypal, Patreon, and even bank accounts simply because they speak their opinions in public. It's a new, terrifying level of control and since corporations control it instead of government, it's doing a nice job of boiling the frog.

      Ok Chicken Little, why don't you go inside so the terrifying level of control can't touch you. Did you mean gay frog?

    10. Re:Police will have an easy job by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, that's not always true that police states get rid of petty crime -- the USSR had a huge petty criminal subclass. The government just cooked their crime statistics and didn't release much information.

      Even in England under the 1800s Bloody Code, pickpocketing was common at public hangings even through theft could earn you a free Australian vacation (at best) or a rope (at worst).

    11. Re:Police will have an easy job by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Mao's China pretty much eliminated crime. That legacy continues today; China is one of the safest countries on the planet. They're installing face recognition cameras everywhere to ensure this stays. The new police state will be unlike anything the world has ever seen; it will have the capability to watch everyone, all the time. Anyone who goes off the grid will be immediately suspicious. Being able to escape surveillance will be a great privilege, held only by our rulers and as a reward for their helpers.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:Police will have an easy job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as "cashless" becomes a reality, police won't have to lift a finger to arrest anyone accused of a crime. They'll just turn off his phone. The suspect will turn himself in to avoid starvation.

      That's the good part of police states. Petty crime virtually disappears. The bad part is that the definition of "crime" expands so far as to encompass anyone who does something the rulers don't like. We're already seeing people being denied financial services like Paypal, Patreon, and even bank accounts simply because they speak their opinions in public. It's a new, terrifying level of control and since corporations control it instead of government, it's doing a nice job of boiling the frog.

      I know you are ignorant as to how Apple Pay works, but Apple Pay does not require internet access.

    13. Re:Police will have an easy job by tepples · · Score: 1

      If all banks in a particular city "have decided not to do business with a specific customer" living in that city, and regulations enacted by the government make it nontrivial to start a bank that does do business with that person, then for all practical purposes, "the government has decided that a person is not allowed to have a bank account."

  48. True but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True but they will also see themselves enslaved to their governments, imprisoned for not working hard enough, and basically a pathetic life which will only include watching videos, masturbating, singing, dancing, and getting high. A worthless life for a worthless future.

  49. I have seen it in Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can even buy a coffee from the machine with your phone - and the machine does not take coins. I paid pretty much everything there by card.

  50. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the same morons using Facebook and Instagram, and see nothing wrong with (and happily), handing over all of their personal data to be harvested and used against them too.

    So they can all go suck a bag of dicks, as far as I'm concerned.

  51. We're already there in some parts of the world. by Rmorph · · Score: 2

    I live in Norway. I haven't touched cash in about 4 years - and that was on a trip to America. Hand on my heart I havent been in a single situation where cash was required. We still keep 500 kroner (60 dollars?) in a drawer for home emergencies - but we've never had to use it. MY 2 year old daughter will never see cash. Even in her birthday cards - she has a bank account and when the time comes for her to spend money she'll have a mobile phone.

    1. Re:We're already there in some parts of the world. by wonkavader · · Score: 2

      This is because you are not going to poor areas to eat. Half my favorite restaurants are cash only. The clientele is almost entirely non-white. Credit cards cost the business ~2% (lower % with higher monthly and other fees, or higher percent with no startup/monthly fees -- When you see these little businesses with the square card readers on a tablet -- those guys are paying 2.75% of everything they make to a company named "Square"). You don't notice this 2% tax on everything you do. People who are just barely getting by DO, and they favor cash-only businesses which are cheaper.

      This is not a state-run cash-less financial system we're talking about here -- It's a for-profit model where the populace voluntarily pays for the convenience. When you talk about a cash-less society in the US, you're talking about a new 2% regressive tax on poor people, where the money doesn't even go into state/communal coffers.

      This is similar to the healthcare situation. We have no full-coverage state healthcare because companies make money on healthcare, and they buy politicians to make sure that doesn't change.

      If we brought in meaningful campaign finance reform, some politician would say "hey -- we could make a state-run credit card and collect that regressive tax ourselves. We could make it lower than 2% and collect that for the state. Retailers would dump the commercial systems in a heartbeat to get the better rate. We could use the force of the treasury department (who use guns/judges/prisons) to cut down fraud in a way the private companies never could and therefore make the system even more profitable and use that money on schools, roads, etc." OVERNIGHT, these articles would change from CASH-IS-BAD to STATE-MONEY-SYSTEMS-ARE-BAD because these articles are paid for by the credit-card companies.

      But don't worry, that will never happen, because we will never have meaningful campaign finance reform. Politicians need the big donors to get elected, and so will do what they are told.

    2. Re:We're already there in some parts of the world. by SemperOSS · · Score: 1

      It is nice to hear from someone who is well to do and who has obviously never done a dodgy transaction in his lifetime. That is not the norm, I tell you.

      When you have had repairs done on your house, you have never asked to settle in cash without receipt but always paid the full amount including VAT (merverdiavgift, mva), which is good for your country. You have never had an affair and never had to pay for objects (dildos, butt plugs, ..., you name it) you would rather not like your partner (or anyone else) to know about. You don't frequent bars, night clubs and similar establishments of questionable reputation and live a fruitful and righteous life.

      Good.

      Unfortunately, your situation does not extend to everyone else. You could, in principle, say that it is not your concern that other people have dirty secrets they do not want other people to know about; and you would (and should) obviously not condone that people are trying to avoid paying their taxes, but ... There are many people around the world, including Norway, that are in so dire a situation that they cannot afford having a payment card or who cannot control their spending when they cannot see the actual amount of money in their hand. What about those people. Please do not start arguments like "it is their own fault", "they should pull themselves together and just not spend more money than they have", ..., some of these people have severe mental health problems and cannot change their behaviour.

      I know the welfare system in Norway is very good and that the state takes hand of most health and poverty problems, but it still has a number of charities, who benefit from people being able to donate in cash. How do you think the charity runs would fare if the canvassers accosting people in the streets to ask for money, if people had to actually get their cards out instead of cool cash? Not so well, I think. Many people would rather not give any money than show the charity collectors that they meant to give only the equivalent of a few coins. I can just imagine that: Thank you sir for the gift of 50 øre. Would you like a receipt?

      A cashless society may make the world more convenient for a lot of people, but it is at a cost to each and every person as the payments go through payments processors and banks, who, with the government that now can check every single transaction, are the biggest beneficiaries of such system. In effect, cashless payments are "taxed" by the amount these companies charges, and the only people to pay are ... us!

      --
      I don't need a signature to draw attention to myself.
    3. Re:We're already there in some parts of the world. by tepples · · Score: 1

      I live in Norway. I haven't touched cash in about 4 years

      When you shop at a yard sale (an occasional personal sale of used goods outside one's home), what form of electronic payment does the cashier accept for payments of 5 to 30 krone? (For those at home, that's about 0.50 to 3 USD.) Or does Norway not have yard sales?

      MY 2 year old daughter will never see cash. [...] when the time comes for her to spend money she'll have a mobile phone.

      Between "when the time comes for her to spend money" and when she graduates, from what income will she pay for service on this phone? Do flip phones in Norway support electronic payment? Or does "the time" not "come[] for her to spend money" until she graduates?

    4. Re:We're already there in some parts of the world. by Rmorph · · Score: 1

      People don't have yard sales here - the most common way of selling stuff is online via a Norwegian ebay-style site called Finn.no. Culturally Norwegians are much more reserved and don't invite strangers onto their lawns. If a church or school or something organises a sale they will have a handheld card terminal or something. There are a number of electronic payment method. Most people under 40 already use a mobile to mobile app payment method called vipps which is where you just enter a friends email and the amount you want to send and they get their amount to their account immediately. You can pay for coffee or groceries this way as well and there will only be more of that type of thing with other providers coming to the Norwegian market such as paypal, apple and facebook.

  52. wtf, will they. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they live long enough, like msmash, to suck dick for dope, or cock for coke?

    The Questions we Ponder,,

  53. I like cash, gold, coin, and silver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA Today are idiots.

  54. Barter by havana9 · · Score: 1

    Because in the future due the fall of western society the economy will return to barter.

  55. What about the disenfranchised? by maddog42 · · Score: 2

    I frequently give some spare change to the homeless or the sub-saharans that are selling tissues at the traffic circles. They likely don't even have a presence in the digital world and probably can't get one...

    1. Re:What about the disenfranchised? by ThosLives · · Score: 2

      Yes - to go fully cashless, society would have to first put in place the infrastructure necessary to guarantee everyone can have a bankable account and the tools to access it, regardless of address or education level or whatever, and deal with age (are we going to issue infants accounts at birth so Grandma can deposit gifts?).

      I am cynical that this is possible - we have enough trouble providing universal <service> as it is, let alone guaranteeing universal banking.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  56. It's never going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cash is essential for gambling, prostitution, drugs, and any activity requiring casual anonymity. Let's say Sweden decided to ban the physical Swedish Krona, only allowing electronic representations of it. The locals would just stock up on euros or dollars to complete their anonymous transactions. Even precious and semi-precious metals could be used.

    Since getting rid of cash would have a severely negative effect on the poor (street beggars who can't collect coins, people who can't access electronic banking), I doubt most countries would have the political will to go through with it anyway.

  57. old "news" by Tom · · Score: 1

    The end of cash has been announced for decades, basically every time some cashless payment system becomes popular. Credit cards, PayPal, Apple Pay, you name it.

    Won't happen. Cash is still the easiest, most convenient payment for both small everyday transactions and private-to-private exchanges. It already has disappeared from most large purchases - people buying a house or a car on cash have become so rare that they're newsworthy. But in all other areas, change is much more slow than all the news articles claim.

    Change will continue to happen, but cash won't disappear anytime soon.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:old "news" by nealric · · Score: 1

      Cash may still be holding on (and probably will in some form or another for many many years), but it is in steady decline. The circumstances where cash MUST be used have fallen to near zero.

      I disagree it is even great for private-private exchanges. For small transfers (like a group paying at a restaurant), I rarely have exact change, meaning you end up owing or someone owes you. For large transfers, it means physically going to the bank and the security risk of carrying a large amount of cash. I'd much rather have someone use an electronic payment service in such circumstances.

      Personally, I use cash maybe about once a month. If big brother wants you, cash won't save you, especially it becomes a rare thing to pay in cash.

  58. Nobody I know under 35 uses cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cash is something I see old people use at the grocery sometimes. I know not one single person under the age of 35 years who uses it.

    The convenience of paying with your phone is simply too great.

  59. Cash transactions == tax by another name by orlanz · · Score: 2

    I don't understand why people think I want to stop by a bank/ATM every once in a while. With cashless, I go there twice a year and feel both trips are a waste of time.

    15 years ago, I had to stop by the Elec office to pay my monthly bill. I though it was asasine then that I had to not only pay for my time but also the teller to... what basically amounted to paper shuffling and database entries.

    Cashless saves me a TON of time and money; and not just at the check out counter. I got better things to do with my time... like doze off in my backyard.

    And we pay middlemen for everything and everywhere. That cashier, elec company teller, toll booth collector, parking attendant, water meter readers, lawn services sales guy, L1 customer support, etc. These are all labor units that are no different than any middleman.

    PS: And I fully support Philadelphia's accept cash initiative. Because some members of our society can't go cashless for whatever reasons. And I believe it is the responsibility of any incorporated authority to provide for all of its resident's needs. This is on top of the legalities that cash is the tender for debt in the US. Don't like those points; go set up shop in an unincorporated area.

    1. Re:Cash transactions == tax by another name by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      My bank is walking distance from home and work -- it's no big deal to stop at an ATM ... as far as supporting the cash initiative, it's not only good for the unbanked, but for privacy in general.

    2. Re: Cash transactions == tax by another name by orlanz · · Score: 1

      We have an ATM downstairs in my office. I can use my debit card to withdraw cash at most stores. But I literally get cash about 3x a year and rarely carry more than $30 on me. To me, the time wasted (however small that may seem to some) is just not worth it. And I have been like this for almost two decades.

      I so rarely make checks out and use ATMs that I have to triple check my work or menu just to make sure I did it all right. I actually know my way around my stock portfolio better than an ATM.

    3. Re: Cash transactions == tax by another name by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      My privacy is worth the extra one minute once or twice a week. Plus, paying cash is often CHEAPER -- we went to a restaurant that offered a 10% cash discount just last week. (And no, I really don't care about the legal/tax implications of this -- not my fucking problem.)

  60. Lunch.. by jythie · · Score: 1

    And here I am planning to hit the bank so I have cash on hand for getting lunches. This really strikes me as someone living in their own affluent cultural bubble and confusing 'millennials' with 'their immediate peer group'.

  61. Cash = Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I like cash. I like privacy. Don't force all to use CCs.

    If some millenials -and others- are happy to share their buy patterns with the Visas and Mastercards of the world, it's your business. Just don't force us into your stupid quest to rid the world of cash.

    1. Re:Cash = Privacy by ledow · · Score: 1

      You will be forced.

      But not because those people are forcing you.

      Because you will soon find that there is no alternative for you, not because people have been vying to get rid of it, but because it's simply not practical to operate anymore.

      For an example, see cheques.

    2. Re:Cash = Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not because people have been vying to get rid of it

      Retail banking has been vying to get rid of cash management for at least a decade. Its not profitable enough for shareholders. Wells Fargo doesn't even have coin counters anymore.

    3. Re:Cash = Privacy by Woldarp · · Score: 1

      You're going to have to start buying tools and bulk comodoties to avoid tracking. Every home will have a milling machine, and a lathe for making metal parts.

  62. You'll pay a tax on every transaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like crap to me. And no more yard sales too.

  63. Fee's will kill credit systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fee's for transactions already killing credit and cashless ideals. We have several retailers charging for credit use, and prefer cash. I think you will see a resurgence of cash as fee's increase.

  64. The trolls have already won. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only governments, but other political actors. In the US we've already had people removed from having bank accounts and credit cards for extra-legal reasons, such as the guy from infowars and spencer. In China there have been millions of people stopped from using public transportation such as planes and trains. As soon as someone campaigns against you, even if you have committed no crime, you will be in trouble financially.

    The trolls have already won.

  65. sure, why not by sad_ · · Score: 1

    sure, i like how easy it is to pay with my card, it's my prefered way of paying for stuff.
    i don't want to pay with my phone, anything involving money has no place on my phone.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  66. US LAW REQUIRES CASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is an old law; it says dollars MUST be accepted for all debts. The only work around is to NOT allow the debt in the 1st place in advance; kind of a word game but the courts if they have any common sense will rule that cash can not be forbidden.

    You can keep the requirement for cash... but you'll get profiled as being a shady person with something to hide. You'll have troubles as the teenager struggles to do basic math and operate a cash register.

    We DO need to KILL nickles and pennies. probably just move everything into 1/10 . don't think biz doesn't round $ like crazy already. POINT: lincoln killed the 1/2 penny which today is worth over 10 cents! But then we don't need to ban... we can make stuff a pain in the ass and people will act like they are in pain to have to handle literally worthless coins...

  67. Cashless ?? What about Identity Theft and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use cash for most of my purchases. I only use a credit card if I am busing something online.
    Cars are a auto loan and cash down. Appliances are cash, TV - cash.

    You don't want cashless... what if someone steals your identity ? Spends your life savings ? And gets away with it ? What then ?
    I have cash saved in a CD/Passbook that is not linked to any checking accounts. My 401k requires 3 forms of authentication to access it.

    What about privacy too. Wow...

    I say cash is King. Merchants should encourage cash purchases by giving a discount for using cash. Why ? The merchant does not have to pay a transaction fee to Mastercard, VISA, American Express, or Discover.

  68. They're already cashless by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

    Being broke and unemployed sucks, but it is a cashless lifestyle.

  69. Earthquake, Hurricane, Flood, Tornado by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see your debit card work then.

    F&cking idiots.

    Do people understand they are paying a 1-5% premium for this tiny convenience?

  70. Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pointless to have cash when you can't have a job (all outsourced or automated) and are deep in debt. Millennials are going to suffer the most from the next economic crises, which will completely obliterate any hope of social mobility and make absolutely clear to everyone that no, we're never going to be well-off again. We're never going to be well-fed again. Poverty is about to become the norm, with complete destitution a looming threat for most of the population. The initial denial will be followed by a short period of turmoil which will be put down swiftly, easily and mercilessly by a militarized and mostly privatized law enforcement system. Resignation and meek acceptance will then set in, as the endgame of humanity - the end of 99% of the population versus the rule of the One Percenters - becomes reality.

    1. Re: Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, just thinking of all those people made homeless, destitute and starving gave me a hard-on. I had to put it in my girlfriend's ass to calm down. She squealed like a pig. Usually I put some lube on it first but not this time. If you ever have to put it up your bitch's ass and can't be asses to use lube, gag her first or the neighbours will lose their shit.

  71. Typical fucking millenial trash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously he doesn't do drugs. What the fuck is with this abstinent generation? I'm in my mid-30s and I swear I have more success finding people older than me to smoke weed with these days. So much "oh, no, I'm good" bullshit from 20-somethings now. For fucking weed. Ten years ago they'd be doing blow if they had the chance.

    We need a new drug revolution.

    1. Re:Typical fucking millenial trash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't know about YOU, but I buy my weed with a credit card. Yay, legalization!

  72. Search and replace by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    I am positive that all these stories are bought and paid for by publicists working for credit card companies and similar big financial firms.

    Imagine the woody any such company gets when it contemplates getting a few percent cut of EVERY transaction BY LAW. Right now every real dollar bill spent anywhere in the company ROBS the credit card companies of their ~2% transaction cut. They want that money. It's a lot.

    Americans and foreigners visiting the US should all be required to pay a 2% sales tax to some rich companies whenever they buy anything. That's just right and proper. This is what this is about, pure and simple. All discussion of security or convenience or even the absurd claims of cost reduction are smoke to obscure the real reason for this.

    1. Re:Search and replace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine the woody...

      Man, I'm getting hard just thinking about it!

    2. Re:Search and replace by PPH · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: Nationalize card transaction processing under the authority of the Federal Reserve bank. Like they handle check clearing today.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  73. Cash isn't going away by sjbe · · Score: 1

    "I haven't had a nickel, dime, quarter or penny in my pocket for two years," writes USA Today tech columnist Jefferson Graham, adding "Why bother? We're now living in what's quickly becoming a cashless society, where credit cards or electronic payments on your phone rule."

    That's because he is rich or at least relatively so and clueless about how lots of people actually live. Poor people don't get this option. Credit cards don't work well in remote areas without network connections. Good luck doing a Venmo in the middle of Alaska. Something like 15% of Americans don't have bank accounts or credit cards or debit cards and many cannot get them under reasonable terms even if they wanted to. Cash isn't going away any time soon and this guy is an idiot if he really believes it will.

  74. That’s okay, though by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Because after the rent on their TriBeCa studio and their student loans, millennials don’t have any money.

    1. Re:That’s okay, though by nealric · · Score: 1

      You'd need a pretty decent income stream to afford a TriBeCa studio in the first place- landlords in NYC won't even approve you if you don't make 40x rent, which would be $2,500 minimum (more like $3,500 for most) in that neighborhood. So you are talking about "cash strapped" folks making $100k+.

  75. Fuck Millennials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck Millennials.

  76. wechat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This already exists in many parts of the world. In China, you can pay for everything using WeChat by scanning a QR code. Even a little one person newsstand has a printed out QR code. It's so ubiquitous that there's a lot of places in New York City that accept using the WeChat wallet as a method of payment. Though it only works if you have a Chinese bank account.

  77. Credit card rebates by jerry_gitomer · · Score: 1

    The middleman causing higher prices for cashless transactions does not apply. An everyday example:

    We are both in the gas station and we both buy $10 at the pump. You pay cash I use my credit card,
    but it only costs me $9.70 because I get a 3% rebate.

    The merchant is paying 5% to the credit card company for processing the sale, but is getting benefits that compensate; for example faster transaction processing, no bounced check fees, no cash embezzlement, no worries about hold ups, an increased customer count because he accepts credit cards, higher sales per customer transaction, and more satisfied customers.

    Not all benefits apply to all merchants, but enough do to make the 5% fee palatble.

    Meanwhile I will be saving 3% on my purchases.

    1. Re:Credit card rebates by PPH · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile I will be saving 3% on my purchases.

      With a $0.20 per gallon markup on a $3.00 /gallon price for credit/debit purchases? Sure, you can skip the discount gas stations and get one price for everyone. That will add about $0.50 per gallon.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  78. okay by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

    "I haven't had a nickel, dime, quarter or penny in my pocket for two years," writes USA Today tech columnist Jefferson Graham

    didn't know that coins were the beginning and end of cash money.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  79. anyone who goes cashless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should be raped and killed

  80. Even girl scouts accept credit cards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But cash isn't going away in this century.

  81. Yeah. It's called Bitcoin. by xtal · · Score: 1

    Haters going to hate, but crypto works.

    --
    ..don't panic
  82. I'd hope so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's so many advantages to cashless, but then again there are a lot of pitfalls. It may take longer than expected without government intervention. For those of us on the poorer spectrum, cash is king. Many can't even get bank accounts. I happen to have one, but still use cash daily. Even worse, I still have to use checks about once a week!

  83. Thank God for illegal immigration... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    I mean it. Illegal immigration keeps the cash economy a-hummin' along nicely in the US -- I thank illegal immigrants for helping preserve my freedom of choice (to pay cash) and privacy. And no, I'm not a coward, so I'm not bothered by the supposed negative implications of the above.

  84. In this Utopia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the poor and the homeless will disappear. Don't worry about where they went, and please try not to stare at that big windowless building with the billowing smokestacks and the padlocked windowless vans that come and go frequently.

  85. Business before people by tflf · · Score: 1

    Just ignore the minor issues of the poor, who have little or no access to non-cash options, or any crank concerned about personal privacy or the inconvenient fact cash is still legal tender. Our only priority should be making businesses happy. Cash needs to remain an option because transactions cannot be tracked by government, business, or third parties. Data from cash transactions cannot be used or sold to track you and your life. Cash works when the power is out, or the Internet connection is down - depending on where you live, or travel, can be an issue. Some small businesses and service providers are cash only. As long as cash is legal tender, acceptance of cash is simply part of the cost for anyone operating a physical business, like rent, power, employee wages, inventory, etc. FYI: I use debit, PayPal, credit cards, etc. when I shop online, and usually in the real world. But, certain transactions are in cash. Tips are always left in cash - some merchants skim tip money from electronic transactions. Some purchases are better done without an electronic record - gifts for my wife for example. And, believe it or not, a few merchants still offer a cash discount.

  86. Socio-economic divide by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    The cashless world has an income barrier.

    There are lots of people who don't have credit cards or bank accounts at all. They take their pay check to the nearest check cashing service as soon as they receive it. Some of them now allow you to do bill pay right there from your pay check. If they need to buy something online, they go to a retail store and buy an Amazon or iTunes or Visa gift card with cash, then use that to make purchases.

    1. Re: Socio-economic divide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That barrier is there for a reason. The divide has a purpose, to separates the haves from the have-nots, and to make that separation wider and wider. Social mobility is gone. Those who are not among the richest will become poor. Those who are poor will be poor forever.

  87. cashless is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As we've seen, payment processors and banks and credit card companies abuse their power to enforce their politics preferences by deplatforming others.

  88. Cashless == paperless. by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2

    At best we'll reach a "cashless" society in the same way we've reached a "paperless" office.

    Cash will diminish, sure. But end?
    What about kids? Are they going to start getting debit cards? Or will they just not be allowed to buy anything in this brave new world?
    Lot's of people don't have bank accounts. What about them?

    You don't replace one technology with another unless it's better in every way.
    If the new is only better in most ways, then it's only going to mostly replace the old.

    1. Re:Cashless == paperless. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Cash will diminish, sure. But end? What about kids? Are they going to start getting debit cards? Or will they just not be allowed to buy anything in this brave new world?

      Yes. That's already the solution here in Norway, they have "allowance" cards down to 8 year olds. It's linked to their parents who can see the balance and transactions, they can't get it withdrawn as cash, they need approval to send to other people and there's strict withdrawal limits and obviously no credit limit/overdraw possibility.

      Lot's of people don't have bank accounts. What about them?

      Pretty much the same as above, except for illegal immigrants no matter how much of a drug addict or whatever there's no reason why you shouldn't have a bank account. I know here in Norway we now have digital food stamps, before it was a requisition - because if you gave them cash it went straight to drugs and alcohol - now they "pay" with a card like other people, as long as you don't try to buy beer. Illegal labor is one of the reasons they want to get rid of cash so many would say this is a feature not a bug.

      They are considering anonymous "charge cards" for tourists etc. with various limitations. One variation I heard is an expiry date before you have to cash it in and no anonymous -> anonymous transfers. That would make it quite painful to keep any major amount of money out of the system and knowing where it came from and where it's going is a pretty good trace.

      Honestly, the main reason cash is still on the table is as an emergency backup. No power, no phones, no Internet, system down = no money to keep society going. You can run for a little while on IDs and IOUs, but not very long...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  89. Until there's something impossible, like, you know, a thunderstorm.

  90. Dildos.com Frequent Buyer Program by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Hi this is your Friendly local Government.

    We see You Bought A LOT Of Dildos.

    Your Place Of Employment has been notified. Pervert.

  91. Banks and credit card companies want by PPH · · Score: 1

    ...you to pay as many of those tasty transaction fees as possible

    FTFY.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  92. why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are companies still trying to make this a thing?

  93. Minimum fees by cordovaCon83 · · Score: 1

    The vending machine at works charge me an extra dime on the dollar if I use a credit card, even if I run it debit. The bar down the street insists on a $10 minimum on credit card due to banking fees. The gas station around the corner charges a higher rate for credit purchases of gasoline. These banking fees results in million if not billions in profits for banks every day. I'm over here trying to get my budget right -- I can't have the bank nicking and diming me at every corner.

  94. Hipster by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    As the first post proves, when cash goes out of being used, hipsters will use cash.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  95. Poor People = Cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many "I"s in this thread and slashdot is not the place to do an accurate economic survey.

    Not too sound too Bernie, but cash is around until everyone is on the grid and able to work within it. I don't see poor people going away within the next 80 years and as long as they are around so will actual cash.

  96. Who said anything about drug abuse? by Petersko · · Score: 1

    I mentioned alcohol abuse... but only drug use. Not abuse. Conflating one to the other is a mistake.

    I'm saying a happy, balanced life is not necessarily the normal state of man. Mostly balanced, okay.

    "I personally have no respect for people who don't have the courage to lose complete control of their lives for a few years." - Marc Maron

  97. Nothing to Hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who claims that they have nothing to hide is participating in the surrender of our fourth amendment rights. The law often asks the question, "What would a reasonable person do?". Today, a "reasonable person" would:

    -Publicly list all of their family members online.
    -Publicly list all of their contacts online.
    -Publicly list their occupation online.
    -Publicly list their phone number online.
    -Publicly list their street address online.
    -Publicly list their shopping preferences online.
    -Publicly post pictures of themselves online.
    -Publicly post their controversial activities online.
    -Publicly post their controversial opinions online.
    -Publicly post their political opinions online.
    -Publicly post their DNA online.

    This makes these people:

    -Less employable, as employers look up this information (even when it is illegal).
    -Prone to discrimination
    -Prone to identity theft and other crimes
    -Prone to manipulation (even to the point of overthrowing democracies)
    -Prone to cyber-bullying
    -Prone to depression
    -Prone to being arrested (falsely or otherwise)
    -Less safe in their homes, possessions, and privacy

    One thing that I really like about Slashdot is the ability to post anonymously. Many here hate it, but at least it respects a person's identity while allowing their opinion to be heard.

  98. Not bloody likely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA today tech columnists are delusional millennials or pandering adults, themselves, methinks. Nothing in life on this earth is just 'inevitable'. Lazy writing. Very lazy.

  99. Affairs happen. by Petersko · · Score: 1

    Affairs happen all the time. And the majority go undiscovered and fade into the past without terminating the relationship.

    Given that nothing seems to stem the tide of infidelity, it seems to me that the cashless society would cause a rise in the divorces.

  100. The black market by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    is a very important check on unfettered government power, and it thrives on cash.

    Nothing good can come of this, and people pushing it (for their own self-interested motives) should be shunned.

  101. Cashless sounds convenient until... by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    ...there's a power outage, or internet goes down, or banks start fleecing business owners with inflated fees, etc..

    Also, as long as people still have the option to use cash relatively conveniently, we won't be so susceptible to hyper-exploitative practices by banks & credit card companies that'd make the big telecoms monopolies blush. You know they're just waiting for the opportunity, don't you?

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  102. Cashless might mean the end of banks instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have payment processing be performed at the point of sale. The money can be anonymously and cryptographically secured for each individual currency unit in your "wallet" wherever that may be, and re-encrypted after transfer so that it is no longer "your" money. That's how cash is handled in any number of sci fi works.

  103. This is privilege talking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in southern Mexico, in the second-poorest state in the union. All my transactions every day - bus fare, restaurants, groceries, utility bills, rent, etc, are paid in cash and cash only. Outside the utility bills (which are paid in cash at a kiosk) there is NO NON-CASH option for any of those things. Everyone in the real world still uses cash, all the time, every day.

  104. Except if you do pay with cash for the sex toy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your damn phone will pop up with "How was your visit to Madam Lucy's House of Personal Pleasure Products".
    I hate when that heppens.

  105. Thanks to the columnist minion for self-IDing. by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    This columnist/blog writer is such an obvious twit, either beyond stupid or in league with the money masters --- what a load of tripe!

  106. uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Millennial: Hi, I'm 20 and like know everything. Cash is dumb. Socialism is the bomb. I'm like so right REEEEEEEE

    China: Yesssss you totally are bro! Universal income!! Free stuff!! F-REEEEE dumb

    Old Wise Man: *buys more guns* *mumbles* dumb kids can't read history again

  107. Banks will control a blacklist of products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once a fully cashless society takes hold, the banks will absolutely control what we can buy and what we can't. Your interest rates will also vary depending on what products you buy (think of credit risk) - The banks may frown on some products more than others. The morning after pill, smut magazines, tobacco products, booze, firearms, non-organic food, anything that's not vegan... Use your imagination.

  108. Card to build social credit. Cash for all others. by bd580slashdot · · Score: 1

    This is a bit off-topic. But until it's all cashless ... I use my card for purchases that will improve my social credit rating, and cash for everything else. For example, I pay cash for alcohol and use a card when I but fresh healthy food. Sure, it takes a little longer to split the transaction if I'm buying both at the same time, but I think it's worth it. If you can afford to, then keep $200 in cash on you at all times. That's enough to get a cheap room and to buy transportation in an emergency, or if your credit card processing system goes down. I also keep a couple rolls of quarters and a bunch of $1 bills in my emergency bag in my car because they are the most common vending machine denominations. You never know ...

  109. Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not if I can help it! ....

    (Oops, that could be misinterpreted...)

  110. We've already seen the cashless future.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virtual Game Currency. Sure, you get paid in increments of X, but everything costs X+1 or X-1 and item has cost such that NOT X mod (X-1 OR X+1) == 0 (I think got got that right, feel free to fix it). So you always have to get 2X just to get the one item costing X+1 or feel like you need to get 2X or more to make use of all even if its X-1. Each actor (games/devs in this case) could set up a locked in currency you can't export after your bought in to it.

  111. forget cashless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody is gonna get the means to dictate when , how, and how much i will spend of my hard earned cash.

    So fuck off.

  112. I get a 1.5% discount by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    in the form of various rewards programs and cashback. I also get the option to dispute most transactions (thanks to US Law, YMMV in your country though). I'm also not liable for unauthorized charges.

    As for the businesses taking my credit cards, they get to sell me more crap (my kid has a copy of my card with her name on it for use in college and yeah, she's spent more on it then I'd probably budget her if I gave her cash, she's got a 4.0 despite getting sick as a dog last year, I can't complain). And it effectively lets a company issue credit without the need to do collections.

    I think it mostly works for folks in good financial shape. Where it becomes nasty is if you're not in good financial shape. Then the sharks circle with 30%+ APRs and they sell your debt to each other and use our legal system to garnish wages. But all that's fixable with some more regulation and some pro-working class legislation like what Bernie Sander's is proposing.

    Speaking of Bernie, I think Credit Cards are a good example of something that works well in the context of Democratic Socialism and Mixed Market Capitalism. e.g. something that we can leave the bulk of it up to private industry while regulating it enough to prevent abuses.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I get a 1.5% discount by martinX · · Score: 1

      Fancy 404 error.
      Oops! We can’t find that page
      If you’ve followed a link from another site for an extension or theme, that item is no longer available. This could be because:

      The developer removed it. Developers commonly do this because they no longer support the extension or theme, or have replaced it.
      Mozilla removed it. This can happen when issues are found during the review of the extension or theme, or the extension or theme has been abusing the terms and conditions for addons.mozilla.org. The developer has the opportunity to resolve the issues and make the add-on available again.
      If you’ve followed a link on this site, you’ve have found a mistake. Help us fix the link by filing an issue. Tell us where you came from and what you were looking for, and we'll get it sorted.

      Try visiting the page later, as the theme or extension may become available again. Alternatively, you may be able to find what you’re looking for in one of the available extensions or themes.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  113. Millennials have no cash by lamer01 · · Score: 1

    So when everyone else has perished, the Millennial world will be a cashless world

  114. I worked in Fast Food by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    and would have loved cashless. Every store I worked at had been robbed at least once while I worked there. I avoided it by sheer dumb luck. The owner of one chain used to keep their lobby's open 24/7 until somebody got pistol whipped. They didn't close them until the cops got fed up and said they'd press negligence charges on the owner the next time somebody got hurt.

    What I'm saying is cash isn't free to a business. There are costs involved. The businesses dropping cash aren't doing it to be hip or because they drunk kool-aid. They're doing it because the costs are now higher than the alternatives.

    And if it bother's you that much just do Postal Banking with government issued cards. Have the gov't issue gift card like devices if being traced bugs you. But I've said this before, being tracked should be low on your list of worries in a world like ours. If you're American you've got Health Care, jobs, climate change and the 8 wars we're fighting. Tracking is a symptom of oppression, not the cause. Focus on the systemic issues that oppress you.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  115. Taxes by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    India did a major shake up to it's paper currency because they couldn't get folks to pay their taxes. It was bad enough that it was retarding the country's growth and modernization efforts.

    You can still have spending privacy for small transactions (think under $10k) with various cash cards. What'll go away is hiding large amounts of money from the tax man in cash. As somebody who gets paid his salary electronically and pays every dime of taxes I say "Good".

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  116. We could just legalize those things by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the current system is kind of fucked up. If you're wealthy you've got basically zero chance of getting arrested for a little hash & shrooms. Being white helps too.

    Every wonder why we haven't legalized drugs? It's because drugs being illegal isn't a problem for a significant portion of the population. Hell, Nixon's people admitted that it was a political move, literally state sponsored terrorism against minorities they didn't like ("minorities" here being literal, e.g. not just race/creed/color but also political minorities).

    There's a big push for drug reform thanks to the "opioid crisis". We even passed some real criminal justice reform. What changed? Middle Class, rural white men and women were getting caught up in the drug war for a change. Since they're a valuable voting block to the right wing (and the left wing already wanted to stop treating drug users like criminals) some progress happened.

    I wouldn't mind seeing all of it brought out into the light. Legal taxed and regulated for the weak stuff (pot & shrooms) and treat the hard stuff (Meth, Heroine) like a disease. That's not going to happen so long as 70% of the population can use witn impunity...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  117. Cash isn't free either by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it has to be counted, moved by secured trucks to banks. You have "shrinkage" in retail & restaurant (e.g. stealing from the till or not ringing up orders, every wonder why you see your order on a screen at a fast food restaurant? it's not so they get it right...).

    When I worked at a fast food joint we were allowed to be off by a certain amount on each till. It was just expected. It was a couple bucks on a $100 till IIRC, so around 2% right there. We weren't always, but I'm guessing that alone was a 1% loss.

    And that's before we talk about armed robbery. I pointed this out elsewhere on the thread but cashless would be a boom to fast food and convenience store employees who often get robbed. And companies typically have to carry insurance to cover that risk. Plus there's the lost money from the robbery.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  118. There's an easy solution to all that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    just stop means testing welfare programs. Implement UBI. Problem solved.

    Or if you have to means test stop doing it on moral grounds. You know most of the South is doing drug test laws for welfare recipients, right? No cash involved.

    One last thing, nobody knows what book you bought except Amazon. All the Credit Card companies know is that you bought something from Amazon.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:There's an easy solution to all that by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Any new UBI will not be given as cash.
      A UBI as a gov assistance program will set all kinds of political, nutritional, welfare limits on spending as its gov money been given to citizens.
      Cash gives freedom.
      A bank, CC, book seller can see what a person was reading, their politics and then take away service.
      Then put that person on a shared watch list to inform other banks and CC brands about why the person had their account removed.
      Where to pay a wage into when a bank removes the ability to have an account and tells other banks/CC not to trust that person?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  119. You know we have gift cards, right? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    completely untraceable unless you're buying dozens of them at a time. Even then they're still untraceable, but they'll stake out the area if you keep doing it in the same place. But long before they did that they'd just stake out your regular haunts and catch you there.

    Credit Cards are not the Number of the Beast. They're not a perfectly traceable item. Nor do they need to be. Cops have much, much better ways to get their way.

    You're right about one thing, cashless would make cops jobs easier. It would end stick ups. There'd be no point knocking over a convenience store or fast food joint if there was no cash there.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You know we have gift cards, right? by tepples · · Score: 1

      There'd be no point knocking over a convenience store or fast food joint if there was no cash there.

      Instead, they'd knock over places that sell gift cards for cash.

  120. cashless world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have lived in one a long time.
    On this subject ATM card and no cash in my pocket is why I don't shop any more malls or Main Street.

  121. Re:Card to build social credit. Cash for all other by Woldarp · · Score: 1

    This is a good idea. I have a google account where I'm subscribed to Tana Mongeau Buzzfeed and Logan Paul. Once in a while I'll binge on Donald Duck when I'm leaving to go out. I do my real watching over TOR only, and won't like anything unless it allows liking over TOR. ( eg: bitchute.com ). It's time to start building social credit and taking that shit seriously.

  122. Bankers agenda, not reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of these stories are coming at us from an industry that has an agenda. Every swipe you make someone is profiting. Banks get a cut of the fees changed to merchants every time a consumer swipes, taps, or waves.

    I take issue with the misleading portrayal of the statistics. Cash is still king in spite of a more digital society. That is more telling about how people feel about it than anything else. I would say that anybody who hasn't used cash to make a purchase get out of the house a bit. I travel a lot and can say that while certain areas do offer electronic payment options that didn't use to its far from ubiquitous. Everything from restaurants, babysitter, gardeners, handymen, barbers, taxi drivers, landlords, bills, and more frequently do not provide an option to pay with a credit card or other digital solution. In fact I had to take out thousands of euros on a 1 week trip to the EU explicitly because so many places wouldn't take plastic. I had originally taken out 500 euros for the trip too. For those that are wondering why so much it has to do with EU socialists driving up the cost of everything. People over there don't realize how poor they actually are and I'm not even talking eastern Europe here.

    1. Re:Bankers agenda, not reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything from restaurants, babysitter, gardeners, handymen, barbers, taxi drivers, landlords, bills, and more frequently do not provide an option to pay with a credit card or other digital solution.

      Wrong wrong wrong. Just goes to show that you have almost no clue. I've traveled quite a bit within the EU (not only the Euro zone) and nowhere have I had issued with using either credit or debit cards. Even in Spain.

        In fact I had to take out thousands of euros on a 1 week trip to the EU explicitly because so many places wouldn't take plastic. I had originally taken out 500 euros for the trip too. For those that are wondering why so much it has to do with EU socialists driving up the cost of everything. People over there don't realize how poor they actually are and I'm not even talking eastern Europe here.

      Another bullshit claim. I've lived in the U.S. for a longer period of time and you just don't realize it is just your inflated U.S. ego talking./p

  123. Transaction fees for sub-dollar transactions by tepples · · Score: 1

    Dear United States. New Zealand has had EFTPOS for years and years.

    We have EFTPOS in the United States as well. It's just very rare to see a merchant that accepts EFTPOS but not credit cards.

    There is a small fee to the merchant for each transaction

    Which itself is prohibitive for the 0.50 to 3.00 USD transactions at yard sales. Is there also a monthly fee for a merchant to accept EFTPOS?

  124. US has EFTPOS by tepples · · Score: 1

    U.S. banks and credit unions are part of EFTPOS networks called Interlink and Maestro. "Visa Debit" cards are on Interlink, and "Debit MasterCard" cards are on Maestro.

  125. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA Today Tech Columnist: Millennials Will Live To See a Cashless World where businesses and the government tell you when and what you can spend your money on.

    Remember some card providers if you read their fine print already can "refuse payments to specific merchants" Want to donate you a charity your bank disagrees with? Denied. Government doesn't want you using a new ISP that didn't grease the right palms? Denied. Want to pay that fine? Sorry mysteriously our card processing machine is down. Go to jail. We don't think a liquor store in the hood is appropriate. Denied.

    You forget that it is trivial to query your bank transactions (It is literally 6 keystrokes and an account number on the MF) and equally trivial to query a merchant's general ledger to match a card transaction to a purchase.

    They know exactly when you bought something and what you bought. Don't think for a minute that insurance companies haven't tried this, I know, I helped write the search for tobacco products. Boiled down to "Search all merchants that sell tobacco related products where a transaction from the banking ledger date and time matches and items sold include tobacco product."

    Buying an anonymous\sanitized ledger from a company isn't terribly hard. All I need is the transaction date and the amount. The odds of the exact same amount at the exact same time, at the exact same location is effectively zero.

    In a cashless society you are giving them absolute control on what you can and cannot buy and be punished for buying the wrong thing depending on the whims of whomever is in charge at the time.

    You. Are. Fucked.

  126. Carrying a phone != subscribing to cellular data by tepples · · Score: 1

    The pocket computer than approximately everyone carries

    Just because someone carries a pocket computer doesn't mean he also subscribes to Internet access for use on that pocket computer while away from home. Currently I subscribe to cable data and do not subscribe to cellular data because switching from cable data to cellular data would cause my home use to routinely exceed the 10 GB per month mobile hotspot data cap that all major cellular ISPs impose.

  127. Thanks for cashless society by McFortner · · Score: 1

    Big Brother would like to thank everybody for pushing for a cashless soceity. It makes it SO MUCH EASIER to keep track of you and is more reliable than tracking your cellphones.

    Remember: Big Brother is watching YOU!

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
  128. Any amount is abuse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In America, those drugs you mentioned are illegal. ANY amount is drug abuse. That isn't my opinion or your opinion. It's the guy's with the guns opinion and it's the law. I'm happy a few states are changing laws, but for now, it is what it is.

  129. 16 Tons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, whatever. We tried that communal capitlaism bullshit in the 1800s and it created the Robber Barons and The Company Store. And charity has never, not once in all of history, met the needs of the poor. Jesus just don't give a fuck that much.

  130. Not cash, fuck coupons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe not cash, but if I see a soccer mom with a fist full of coupons, I just walk away from my basket and go the fuck home.

    And as far as the "cash line", I think they mean the lines that aren't self-checkout. I hate self-check lines too.