Yes, bots can "cheat" by taking advantage of godlike knowledge and perfect positional knowledge and targeting.
This AI seems, anyway, to learn to solve different sub problems and integrate them to an overall strategy. Yes there are some botlike cheats, like knowing to the pixel/tick whether you will make it to a pellet or whatever that a human would need lots of training to see and get right one in ten times.
Of course, and I was actually going to cite that famous example, but that was more a case of application developers believing their software would no longer be in use, rather than believing the platforms it ran on would have been retired.
I'm not even sure that consciously entered into it. The year 2000 was long past when we'd have giant wheel space stations, a sizable city on the moon, and colonies on Mars and further out, to say nothing of robots and flying cars.
Censorship is disallowed not because there isn't dangerous speech. Rather it is disallowed because giving government that power lets those in power define dangerous speech as speech that threatens their power.
What’s interesting about this is that we’re talking about a relatively small group of maniacs. The average American does not search “kill Muslims” or “I hate Muslims”; it's a small group but it's also an important group because these types of people can create a lot of problems. They are the ones who tend to commit hate crimes or even murder Muslims.
So it depends what "full of" means for America. In this case, it means a misleading clickbait title for an article wrapping his book with a buy link.
They are already archived instantly by president and Trump monitoring sites, news organizations, etc.
This bill is stupid because it does nothing except try to control a private organization's (facebook's) messaging. They want a tool to hit a disfavored president over the head with. As its goal is already accomplished, the point is moot, in a context where freedom of speech is stepped on (facebook, or the President setting his message) neither of which is transgressible.
The only people who can get into the backdoor'd encryption are good governments stopping crime and terrorism, and every dictatorship out there intending to keep their own people down for ever and ever.
And good governments won't ever abuse it secretly to aid those in power, nor fall from freedom to dictatorship, because we have no historical examples of that ever happening.
"This is useful to detect whistle blowers in the US."
Again, we are sacrificing billions around the world to dictatorships who will just use the exact same products to clamp down on their own people.
If 1984 were to be rewritten, it should have been from the point of view of many billions living in grinding dictatorship, being spied on by their governments simply using commercial products sold to them by some hundreds of millions living in relative freedom, embedding spying tech in those products to catch mundane crooks in their own society.
5 or 10 points ain't nothing. You've clearly never had high blood pressure issues.
This "ballpark figure" for home use is about knowing when you should contact your doctor because something is well wrong (20, 30, 50 points or more) out of your normal range. Yes, really shitty ones should be banned, but doctors measure their own at the office professionally for clinical decisions.
I've had doctors come in and personally do my high blood pressure multiple times themselves because the nurse's measurements seemed odd.
But he does lose. That you feel it is worth it enough to view indicates you are actually willing to pay something for it. "I would pay nothing" for something you clamor to acquire is a false claim.
There's no way in hell I'd have paid for most of it, so for the producers to cry that it's "lost revenue" is bullshit
Except this is the wrong way to look at it. "I would never pay for it, so I should get to see it for free!"
How copyrights work is your very desire to see it is what the authors leverage to earn money. Earning money induces them to produce works, which is what benefits The People in the long run.
You shouldn't get to drink a Coke, either (or drink one for 12 cents) just because you don't feel it's worth it to pay the retail price.
They don't really even need your name and personal info. Web sites report your IP and the shit you look at to central advertising computers that assemble a dossier of the types of things you would statistically be interested in buying, then sell that off ad space at an increased rate to particular products being advertised.
It's all automatic and doesn't need your name at all. A name or phone number lets them tie you together across multiple devices, and to a larger historic record of you-the-person, but just an IP is good enough for 90% of it.
The extra time is just a feel-good measure. The people doing these crimes have already decided they're going over the point of no return, and will likely end up dead, or executed eventually. Life in prison without parole (or a parole date 300 years in the future) is literally the best they could expect.
"You'd better not kill a bunch of people because if you hate, if you hate!, then you will get an extra 40 years tagged onto the end of your 400 years!"
Is that going to dissuade someone who expects to die during their rampage of hate?
That still requires the data for all 65536 movies to be migrated to your disk as part of the algorithm installation, absolutely crushing the savings of storing or transmitting two bytes for the "compressed" movie.
Oh look, a $400 million settlement, where the half dozen principle plaintiffs get $30,000 each, the lawyers get $50 million, and all other customers get $7 off their next pay-per-view.
One will donate to Franken's campaign. If we follow the money, let's follow all of it. What wreckage for a tiny fraction of one cent on the dollar.
If you keep stopping computers from watching your emotions in the background, you're never gonna have cool science fiction wonders like the Ash, David, and HAL 9000 lines.
Nice that this is the accepted viewpoint. It wasn't so too long ago. I can't remember if it was Richard Pryor or Eddie Murphy, but in one routine he mocks white people contemplating that, in a mock white voice, "That could be true, you know."
I've found those who say don't read it because you are defective if you do to be akin to ignorant religious folk who hiss and spit if you dare to learn about another religion.
HELLBOUND SINNER!
Memeplexes adopt memes that hiss at you as defective for considering a position opposed to them.
I agree about the unabridged Stranger in a Strange Land. The political power machinations of those bastards is some of the most riveting reading. If there ever was a SF crossover book for non-SF fans to read, this is it.
Slashdot Mirror
With no intellectual equals among the adult population, they are feral humans who grew up among children.
There have been perhaps a few thousands of true humans, and everybody else is just a trainable animal.
Yes, bots can "cheat" by taking advantage of godlike knowledge and perfect positional knowledge and targeting.
This AI seems, anyway, to learn to solve different sub problems and integrate them to an overall strategy. Yes there are some botlike cheats, like knowing to the pixel/tick whether you will make it to a pellet or whatever that a human would need lots of training to see and get right one in ten times.
Of course, and I was actually going to cite that famous example, but that was more a case of application developers believing their software would no longer be in use, rather than believing the platforms it ran on would have been retired.
I'm not even sure that consciously entered into it. The year 2000 was long past when we'd have giant wheel space stations, a sizable city on the moon, and colonies on Mars and further out, to say nothing of robots and flying cars.
Censorship is disallowed not because there isn't dangerous speech. Rather it is disallowed because giving government that power lets those in power define dangerous speech as speech that threatens their power.
What’s interesting about this is that we’re talking about a relatively small group of maniacs. The average American does not search “kill Muslims” or “I hate Muslims”; it's a small group but it's also an important group because these types of people can create a lot of problems. They are the ones who tend to commit hate crimes or even murder Muslims.
So it depends what "full of" means for America. In this case, it means a misleading clickbait title for an article wrapping his book with a buy link.
I wonder if the CDC includes carbon monoxide and cliff diving suicides in car deaths?
They are already archived instantly by president and Trump monitoring sites, news organizations, etc.
This bill is stupid because it does nothing except try to control a private organization's (facebook's) messaging. They want a tool to hit a disfavored president over the head with. As its goal is already accomplished, the point is moot, in a context where freedom of speech is stepped on (facebook, or the President setting his message) neither of which is transgressible.
The only people who can get into the backdoor'd encryption are good governments stopping crime and terrorism, and every dictatorship out there intending to keep their own people down for ever and ever.
And good governments won't ever abuse it secretly to aid those in power, nor fall from freedom to dictatorship, because we have no historical examples of that ever happening.
"This is useful to detect whistle blowers in the US."
Again, we are sacrificing billions around the world to dictatorships who will just use the exact same products to clamp down on their own people.
If 1984 were to be rewritten, it should have been from the point of view of many billions living in grinding dictatorship, being spied on by their governments simply using commercial products sold to them by some hundreds of millions living in relative freedom, embedding spying tech in those products to catch mundane crooks in their own society.
Presumably light colors are mapped to white rather than black.
5 or 10 points ain't nothing. You've clearly never had high blood pressure issues.
This "ballpark figure" for home use is about knowing when you should contact your doctor because something is well wrong (20, 30, 50 points or more) out of your normal range. Yes, really shitty ones should be banned, but doctors measure their own at the office professionally for clinical decisions.
I've had doctors come in and personally do my high blood pressure multiple times themselves because the nurse's measurements seemed odd.
But he does lose. That you feel it is worth it enough to view indicates you are actually willing to pay something for it. "I would pay nothing" for something you clamor to acquire is a false claim.
There's no way in hell I'd have paid for most of it, so for the producers to cry that it's "lost revenue" is bullshit
Except this is the wrong way to look at it. "I would never pay for it, so I should get to see it for free!"
How copyrights work is your very desire to see it is what the authors leverage to earn money. Earning money induces them to produce works, which is what benefits The People in the long run.
You shouldn't get to drink a Coke, either (or drink one for 12 cents) just because you don't feel it's worth it to pay the retail price.
They don't really even need your name and personal info. Web sites report your IP and the shit you look at to central advertising computers that assemble a dossier of the types of things you would statistically be interested in buying, then sell that off ad space at an increased rate to particular products being advertised.
It's all automatic and doesn't need your name at all. A name or phone number lets them tie you together across multiple devices, and to a larger historic record of you-the-person, but just an IP is good enough for 90% of it.
The extra time is just a feel-good measure. The people doing these crimes have already decided they're going over the point of no return, and will likely end up dead, or executed eventually. Life in prison without parole (or a parole date 300 years in the future) is literally the best they could expect.
"You'd better not kill a bunch of people because if you hate, if you hate!, then you will get an extra 40 years tagged onto the end of your 400 years!"
Is that going to dissuade someone who expects to die during their rampage of hate?
Isn't it bad because of the numbers, though? Why wouldn't you give a progressive level of punish per murder if there are multiple murders?
Is a single murder for hate somehow worse than being murdered for $5?
Since these cases are much rarer than being murdered for $5, isn't it odd that we're ladling extra punishment on the far rarer crime?
Oh, whew! For a second I feard it was something with a giant green Orc raging around about honor.
That still requires the data for all 65536 movies to be migrated to your disk as part of the algorithm installation, absolutely crushing the savings of storing or transmitting two bytes for the "compressed" movie.
You don't get something for nothing.
Oh look, a $400 million settlement, where the half dozen principle plaintiffs get $30,000 each, the lawyers get $50 million, and all other customers get $7 off their next pay-per-view.
One will donate to Franken's campaign. If we follow the money, let's follow all of it. What wreckage for a tiny fraction of one cent on the dollar.
If you keep stopping computers from watching your emotions in the background, you're never gonna have cool science fiction wonders like the Ash, David, and HAL 9000 lines.
And what about the wind blowing away?
Have they moved into the Microsoft territory of "Me, too!" ?
Mankind is from Africa narrative
Nice that this is the accepted viewpoint. It wasn't so too long ago. I can't remember if it was Richard Pryor or Eddie Murphy, but in one routine he mocks white people contemplating that, in a mock white voice, "That could be true, you know."
I've found those who say don't read it because you are defective if you do to be akin to ignorant religious folk who hiss and spit if you dare to learn about another religion.
HELLBOUND SINNER!
Memeplexes adopt memes that hiss at you as defective for considering a position opposed to them.
I agree about the unabridged Stranger in a Strange Land. The political power machinations of those bastards is some of the most riveting reading. If there ever was a SF crossover book for non-SF fans to read, this is it.