In theory a pair of pliers to hold the bullet and a hammer with a pointy bit to hit the pin is all you need.
From experience, the above will end with you in the emergency room having pieces of brass being removed from your body. (Yes, I really did something that stupid as a kid)
You need something to contain and direct the explosion or the brass case will explode and produce shrapnel. Try putting it in a steel tube to direct the explosion to propel the bullet.
No the analogy is somewhat more correct. They are breaking the law when they are transferring a 3D file that does not require any abilities to finish the manufacturing of the receiver.
Are you sure? You can buy 80% blanks that 80% of the work is done on and they are not a receiver until you do the remaining 20% of the work. At best the 3D file is 33% of the receiver, you still need the printer, the plastics material, and the the finishing work to make it fit. In reality the 3D file is more like the blueprints. I can put a 3D file into an computer controlled CNC machine and have it make the receiver. It is the exact same thing and not illegal..
I would not call it a conspiracy, they have created artificial barriers to entry on the national level.
Things like, if you do not hold 10% of the vote nationally, you can not participate in the national presidential debates. The two major parties have laws in place that gives them millions/billions from the national coffers for their campaigns.
Add to that the fact that if a third party gains enough signatures to get their name on the ballot, they will have there ballot access challenged by one of the two major parties. This forces the third party to defend their listing on the ballot in court and takes considerable money from the donations they have received.
All of this works to keep the names and platforms of the third parties from ever reaching the bulk of the people and gaining a foothold that could jeopardize the two party system.
Look at the extent they went to with Ron Paul the first time he ran. If only 1/2 of the stuff I heard was true, then there is a major issue that no one seems to be looking into.
But the social contract is a crock of BS. There is no social contract, The laws of nature govern both man and society and it is survival of the fittest. (To take a Nietzschean stance on this) To do otherwise would allow the weak to survive and reproduce, thus degrading the gene pool and weakening man as a whole. The only outcome from that would be the complete extension of man.
Ummm, Louis Blanc the most influential of all socialists wrote "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!" in his 1839, thesis "The organization of work"
It was repeated by Karl Marx in his 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program.
So, it is very Socialist and is true to socialism.
No in socialism "workers contribute to society based on their ability and receive pay according to their needs"
They are students, they dont need money. The state pays for the school and they can contribute to the state by working for free or for reduced wadges in the factory.
Linux is like water. Water is free and abundant, but the only way a business is going to make money off water is a. take the good stuff (mt spring for example) for yourself and sell it (e.g. Evian) b. give "free" water such a bad rap that yours is better (e.g. pollute the crap out of free water). But then sell basic tap water with good marketing (e.g. Dansi, Dannon, Arrowhead, etc...)
Odd, I thought companies making things like boats, fishing rods, lures, bate, sails, paint, etc,etc were all making money off Water.
In any case the root is the same--a growing distrust of authority, especially governmental authority, as government less and less appears to be capable of solving the big social and economic problems of our time.
You have a problem with the above statement, Fixing social and economic problems is not the job of government. The job of government is best laid out in the Declaration of Independence.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness
See, social and economic issues are not even mentioned as a job of government.
No amount of state intervention could destroy a free market, anymore than a ton of magnets could hide gravity. But "free market" in America is more often a profession of a conservative cultural perspective.)
critical illness with a high deductible covers that at $100 a month to cover all of us.
Still cheaper.
Maybe something you dont know, If I am injured in a car accident then the auto insurance covers it. If i am injured helping a friend work on their house, their home owners insurance covers it. Injured at work, well there is insurance at work to cover that.
There is no regulation to what you make the serial number on a receiver you build your self. Hell you could make the SN:00000000.000000009 for all it matters
Also note that someone can make it and finish it up to 80% then sell it to you and you do the last 20%
Come one, artificial gravity is easy. You use a simple quantum graviton emitter to pull gravitons from the gbrain and emit them in concentration creating an artificial gravity field.
I will bash the scientists involved. I have read all the e-mails and was appalled at what I saw.
Blatant attempts to hide data/loose FOAI requests. This in and of it self is a major red flag in my book. A suggestion that they could stack the deck of pier reviewed journals in an attempt to stop publication of dissenting opinions and findings. A suggestion that they could identify who was reviewing there paper for a journal and influence the outcome. Suggestions of using bad data to fill in holes in the existing data. Suggestions that findings which are contradictory to the established belief be "fudged" to be more inline with other papers. The use of questionable mathematics to smooth temperature graphs.
There may have been no questionable wrongdoing, but from the e-mails it really looks like there could have been.
As to them being "ultimately cleared them of wrongdoing" Sorry, an internal investigation is worthless. That is like a scientist doing the pier review on his own paper and approving it, or his lab assistant doing the review and approving it. There is a reason it is sent out to others to review and a reason the reviewers are kept secret. There suggested attempt to circumvent this methodology not with standing.
Slashdot Mirror
Unless you are going to mars then you want them to use a single unit and not change mid calculation.
http://articles.cnn.com/1999-09-30/tech/9909_30_mars.metric.02_1_climate-orbiter-spacecraft-team-metric-system?_s=PM:TECH
Unless you have your own well, then it is not metered. He must have been on a farm.
and any shoe string added to a simi-auto rifle makes it an automatic weapon.
http://www.everydaynodaysoff.com/2010/01/25/shoestring-machine-gun/
In theory a pair of pliers to hold the bullet and a hammer with a pointy bit to hit the pin is all you need.
From experience, the above will end with you in the emergency room having pieces of brass being removed from your body. (Yes, I really did something that stupid as a kid)
You need something to contain and direct the explosion or the brass case will explode and produce shrapnel. Try putting it in a steel tube to direct the explosion to propel the bullet.
No the analogy is somewhat more correct. They are breaking the law when they are transferring a 3D file that does not require any abilities to finish the manufacturing of the receiver.
Are you sure? You can buy 80% blanks that 80% of the work is done on and they are not a receiver until you do the remaining 20% of the work. At best the 3D file is 33% of the receiver, you still need the printer, the plastics material, and the the finishing work to make it fit. In reality the 3D file is more like the blueprints. I can put a 3D file into an computer controlled CNC machine and have it make the receiver. It is the exact same thing and not illegal..
Real Trash?
Reused Technology?
Redundant technology?
Ring Token?
Rubbish Tin?
Rubber Tit?
Rectal Thermometer?
I would not call it a conspiracy, they have created artificial barriers to entry on the national level.
Things like, if you do not hold 10% of the vote nationally, you can not participate in the national presidential debates.
The two major parties have laws in place that gives them millions/billions from the national coffers for their campaigns.
Add to that the fact that if a third party gains enough signatures to get their name on the ballot, they will have there ballot access challenged by one of the two major parties. This forces the third party to defend their listing on the ballot in court and takes considerable money from the donations they have received.
All of this works to keep the names and platforms of the third parties from ever reaching the bulk of the people and gaining a foothold that could jeopardize the two party system.
Look at the extent they went to with Ron Paul the first time he ran. If only 1/2 of the stuff I heard was true, then there is a major issue that no one seems to be looking into.
Sorry, auto-erect at it's best
But the social contract is a crock of BS. There is no social contract, The laws of nature govern both man and society and it is survival of the fittest. (To take a Nietzschean stance on this) To do otherwise would allow the weak to survive and reproduce, thus degrading the gene pool and weakening man as a whole. The only outcome from that would be the complete extension of man.
Ummm, Louis Blanc the most influential of all socialists wrote "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!" in his 1839, thesis "The organization of work"
It was repeated by Karl Marx in his 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program.
So, it is very Socialist and is true to socialism.
No in socialism "workers contribute to society based on their ability and receive pay according to their needs"
They are students, they dont need money. The state pays for the school and they can contribute to the state by working for free or for reduced wadges in the factory.
Full on Socialism at work.
Linux is like water. Water is free and abundant, but the only way a business is going to make money off water is
a. take the good stuff (mt spring for example) for yourself and sell it (e.g. Evian)
b. give "free" water such a bad rap that yours is better (e.g. pollute the crap out of free water). But then sell basic tap water with good marketing (e.g. Dansi, Dannon, Arrowhead, etc...)
Odd, I thought companies making things like boats, fishing rods, lures, bate, sails, paint, etc,etc were all making money off Water.
Federal law prohibits it. If it is than it is being done in violation of the law.
In any case the root is the same--a growing distrust of authority, especially governmental authority, as government less and less appears to be capable of solving the big social and economic problems of our time.
You have a problem with the above statement, Fixing social and economic problems is not the job of government.
The job of government is best laid out in the Declaration of Independence.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness
See, social and economic issues are not even mentioned as a job of government.
No amount of state intervention could destroy a free market, anymore than a ton of magnets could hide gravity. But "free market" in America is more often a profession of a conservative cultural perspective.)
Really???? Have you been to/seen Cuba lately?
What areas of scientific inquiry are simply forbidden as you say?
Medical Marijuana research.
No it says that windows has a "Security model" I am guessing it is a Model of the HMS Titanic.
Rules of acquisition #45 "Expand, or die"
He could still be following the rules of acquisition just looking to expand his mind.
critical illness with a high deductible covers that at $100 a month to cover all of us.
Still cheaper.
Maybe something you dont know, If I am injured in a car accident then the auto insurance covers it. If i am injured helping a friend work on their house, their home owners insurance covers it. Injured at work, well there is insurance at work to cover that.
I think you are wrong there.
Insurance to cover me, wife, and kid @ work $685 a month
Paying out of pocket
$65 a visit + tests and prescriptions.
Averaged $150 for a visit.
We would maybe see a doctor 2x a year each.
12 visits == $1800 a year
12 month of insurance == $8220.00
Saving us $6420 a year.
AR-15 receiver #1
SN: BATFSUCK5
AR-15 receiver #2
SN: B1TEMEATF
There is no regulation to what you make the serial number on a receiver you build your self. Hell you could make the SN:00000000.000000009 for all it matters
Also note that someone can make it and finish it up to 80% then sell it to you and you do the last 20%
Come one, artificial gravity is easy. You use a simple quantum graviton emitter to pull gravitons from the gbrain and emit them in concentration creating an artificial gravity field.
Everyone knows that.... Wait, what year is it?
never mind.
"How many divisions of bailiffs can the Appeals Court muster?"
Ill volunteer to be deputized for this duty!
Whos with me?
I have a DS, I am a peer reviewer on SlashDot.
I have reviewed both articles and agree with them.
There, they are now peer reviewed. Does it add any more validity to the?
I will bash the scientists involved. I have read all the e-mails and was appalled at what I saw.
Blatant attempts to hide data/loose FOAI requests. This in and of it self is a major red flag in my book.
A suggestion that they could stack the deck of pier reviewed journals in an attempt to stop publication of dissenting opinions and findings.
A suggestion that they could identify who was reviewing there paper for a journal and influence the outcome.
Suggestions of using bad data to fill in holes in the existing data.
Suggestions that findings which are contradictory to the established belief be "fudged" to be more inline with other papers.
The use of questionable mathematics to smooth temperature graphs.
There may have been no questionable wrongdoing, but from the e-mails it really looks like there could have been.
As to them being "ultimately cleared them of wrongdoing" Sorry, an internal investigation is worthless. That is like a scientist doing the pier review on his own paper and approving it, or his lab assistant doing the review and approving it. There is a reason it is sent out to others to review and a reason the reviewers are kept secret. There suggested attempt to circumvent this methodology not with standing.