Hey, dipshit, you didn't even get the first post, so don't even bother claiming it. Why don't you post something more accurate like that you are a fucking loser?
I don't know. I suggest before you click submit that you copy the post in case you get one of those errors. I've been getting two or three of them in a row before I can get a post through.
Well, there probably are some holes in it, but I wouldn't know what to try without thinking for awhile about it. I'm fairly certain this version has most of the bugs and security holes out of it, but when they do another major "upgrade" I am sure there will be plenty of new bugs to exploit.
Linux is not cost effective because it is unnecessarily difficult for ordinary people. Fuck Linux and fuck the zealots like you who make stupid statements about how good they say Linux is. Linux is a piece-of-shit OS maintained by a bunch of unhygienic GNU hippies.
Only because of all the voter fraud in the City of Saint Louis did that happen. It was so bad that U.S. Marshalls got called in to oversee the mayoral election, which Francis Slay won easily. The rest of the state almost certainly would have elected Ashcroft, and the vote was close enough that without the fraud, Ashcroft would have won. Furthermore, there was a sympathy vote and it was already known at the time that his widow would be appointed by Governor Holden to the Senate. Not to mention that polls in the City of Saint Louis were held open late by approval of a judge, a decision which was overturned later in the night, but not before the polls were held open for a time. So I'm not sure Ashcroft didn't really win Missouri, and the Senate has the power to choose its membership in some cases and could have sent Carnahan's widow home, as would Ashcroft have the opportunity to request recounts, which he declined. So get the facts before you go making ignorant comments. Thanks.
Ask yourself if the people really support Microsoft being broken up. There are those who feel that Microsoft really is innovating and ask what happened to free enterprise. And there are also those who believe Microsoft did break the law but breaking them up is too extreme. Those who really want Microsoft broken up are in the minority. This is a democracy and a solution that is more moderate and closer to the opinion of the public is being pursued. I'm glad democracy came through instead of a quick fix like breaking up the company by a few with a somewhat more extreme view.
Remember, Microsoft still will be punished for illegal activities, just other solutions are being pursued. I've always thought breaking up Microsoft when other solutions were available was rather extreme.
As far as Microsoft being on the verge of being punished, they would be stalling it in courts and we'd still be quite far from any settlement or decision. As it is, this may well speed up the punishment of Microsoft and hopefully a more positive solution that actually does something to remedy the illegal practices is in the works. Breaking Microsoft up was the easy way out and hopefully this administration will come up with something better.
Remember, a lot of people don't think Microsoft should be broken up. And the longer it stalls in court, the longer Microsoft can continue unfair business practices. The case against Microsoft is not being dropped, and by speeding the case up, less damage can be done. But this pretty much accuses the government of being bribed into not breaking up Microsoft and that's an asinine accusation to make. Just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean that those who do agree are acting with bad intentions, or are acting that way because they have been bribed. This article has no business being on Slashdot and is just more anti-Microsoft zealotry.
Too bad, faggot, you didn't get the first post. In fact, you didn't get close, because you only managed to get the fourth post. Go kill yourself now, you have failed in life.
Slashdot Mirror
And I think this article needs the page width disrupted. Enjoy, losers, when you have to scroll over to read the text of the article.
The only point you know about is CmdrTaco's tiny penis sticking up your gaping ass.
props to cyborg_monkey, j0nkatz, mackga, sporks, egg troll, and anyone else I forgot.
You are a loser and an AC. You fail. Dumbass.
Maybe you should get CmdrTaco's little brown penis right up your ASS!
Hey, dipshit, you didn't even get the first post, so don't even bother claiming it. Why don't you post something more accurate like that you are a fucking loser?
Nope, I haven't played it yet, but I want to. *shrug*
I don't know. I suggest before you click submit that you copy the post in case you get one of those errors. I've been getting two or three of them in a row before I can get a post through.
Well, there probably are some holes in it, but I wouldn't know what to try without thinking for awhile about it. I'm fairly certain this version has most of the bugs and security holes out of it, but when they do another major "upgrade" I am sure there will be plenty of new bugs to exploit.
I'm exercising my rights of free speech and telling you to fuck off, AC. You're also free to give Katz a rim job if you'd like. Fucking AC moron.
I'm pretty sure you can't. I think the same rules apply that do to the rest of the comment.
Not a lot, just watching the Tennessee-Alabama game and trying to fuck up the page width. :)
Hello, egg troll, what's up?
Linux is not cost effective because it is unnecessarily difficult for ordinary people. Fuck Linux and fuck the zealots like you who make stupid statements about how good they say Linux is. Linux is a piece-of-shit OS maintained by a bunch of unhygienic GNU hippies.
You are an AC. You don't deserve the first post. Thankfully, the first post didn't go to an AC. You are a LOSER.
You are a fucking idiot. Losers like you should post as ACs and should be regularly dragged into the street and shot. You are a LOSER.
Hm, can we claim this article in the name of trolls, too? I think we can! Long live trolls and crapflooders.
Didn't you forget bringing the sporks in? They are an important part of this, too!
Only because of all the voter fraud in the City of Saint Louis did that happen. It was so bad that U.S. Marshalls got called in to oversee the mayoral election, which Francis Slay won easily. The rest of the state almost certainly would have elected Ashcroft, and the vote was close enough that without the fraud, Ashcroft would have won. Furthermore, there was a sympathy vote and it was already known at the time that his widow would be appointed by Governor Holden to the Senate. Not to mention that polls in the City of Saint Louis were held open late by approval of a judge, a decision which was overturned later in the night, but not before the polls were held open for a time. So I'm not sure Ashcroft didn't really win Missouri, and the Senate has the power to choose its membership in some cases and could have sent Carnahan's widow home, as would Ashcroft have the opportunity to request recounts, which he declined. So get the facts before you go making ignorant comments. Thanks.
And I just claimed it as my first post. Thanks, AC.
Ask yourself if the people really support Microsoft being broken up. There are those who feel that Microsoft really is innovating and ask what happened to free enterprise. And there are also those who believe Microsoft did break the law but breaking them up is too extreme. Those who really want Microsoft broken up are in the minority. This is a democracy and a solution that is more moderate and closer to the opinion of the public is being pursued. I'm glad democracy came through instead of a quick fix like breaking up the company by a few with a somewhat more extreme view.
Remember, Microsoft still will be punished for illegal activities, just other solutions are being pursued. I've always thought breaking up Microsoft when other solutions were available was rather extreme.
As far as Microsoft being on the verge of being punished, they would be stalling it in courts and we'd still be quite far from any settlement or decision. As it is, this may well speed up the punishment of Microsoft and hopefully a more positive solution that actually does something to remedy the illegal practices is in the works. Breaking Microsoft up was the easy way out and hopefully this administration will come up with something better.
Remember, a lot of people don't think Microsoft should be broken up. And the longer it stalls in court, the longer Microsoft can continue unfair business practices. The case against Microsoft is not being dropped, and by speeding the case up, less damage can be done. But this pretty much accuses the government of being bribed into not breaking up Microsoft and that's an asinine accusation to make. Just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean that those who do agree are acting with bad intentions, or are acting that way because they have been bribed. This article has no business being on Slashdot and is just more anti-Microsoft zealotry.
Too bad, faggot, you didn't get the first post. In fact, you didn't get close, because you only managed to get the fourth post. Go kill yourself now, you have failed in life.
the postercomment compression filter sucks