India and China both have nukes yet they are mostly coal powered... why is that? especially in china where the government kills a person for complaining too much.
that is like saying "what about the guy who first cut open the chest of some one and failed to successfully perform heart surgery?"
the people that get credit for stuff are not the ones who come up with an under performance. they are the ones that come up with something that out performs even what they thought posable.
far fewer acres of rainforest are actually cut down than the Greenies would have you think.
we can fix the over fishing problems, the coral will grow back, and BTW.. there is an ecological balance... the planet self regulates, that is why the climate changes.
it is controversial not because some think nothing has to be done, but that the treaty, in some opinions, won't do a damn thing because it ignores the 3rd world which in the next century will be producing more CO2 and particulate matter than the first world.
you reuse the bezel on the case. just remove the front of the drawer on the drive.
as to the GFX card, that is not an apple tax it is a gouge by the card makers. and if you looked at recent cards, the prices are falling in line with the PC cards.
first... it is the point of a law suit to PROVE that he knew. second... even if the kid has an anonymous way for people to submit information. as a journalist it is his duty to make sure he is not breaking the law. and not knowing the exact source is not an excuse for not knowingly passing trade secrets. the quality of the information and even the fact that he had an anonymous info drop is reason enough to know that some of the info received was a tread secret.
bottom line, Apple has a right to its day in court to prove this kid is liable and should be forced to reveal his sources.
first.. you have to bring a case in order to have a judge decide if you have standing. second, simply breaking a law does not make you a protester of a bad law. you need to have some sort of organization behind you, even if it is made up. you need to report your intentions of breaking the law so people know what you are doing.
if simply breaking the law was all it took to be considered a protester of the law, then murderers would have the largest Lobby in the country.
first, the fact that you think punctuation on Slashdot is meaningful is stupid.
second... the OP was not circular. and Bill did in fact simply rehash everything the OP was arguing against.
one who simply repeats themself is unintelligent or unprepared and should not be making an argument in the first place which in turn can be construed as stupidity.
dude.. unjust laws have entire movements against them. the law against Murder has more people infringing upon it than the UTSA... so I guess there is a movement to legalize murder?
so if a journalist gets information that reveals the location of a murder and he then reports on the murder but does not reveal who told him he is immune from prosecution?
sorry but journalists break laws just like normal people and they are liable for them just like normal people.
Slashdot Mirror
arpaNet is NOT the internet.
yeah right... they are not bound to reduce their emissions so how do you suppose they would be enticed to do so?
except that they are not doing that.
India and China both have nukes yet they are mostly coal powered... why is that? especially in china where the government kills a person for complaining too much.
hmm.. did NCP make it posable for the internet?
that is like saying "what about the guy who first cut open the chest of some one and failed to successfully perform heart surgery?"
the people that get credit for stuff are not the ones who come up with an under performance. they are the ones that come up with something that out performs even what they thought posable.
ever!!!!
but I bet the father of the protocol that sits on top of SMTP to add SPAM protection will.
now go back to your home my son and stop this blasphemy.
far fewer acres of rainforest are actually cut down than the Greenies would have you think.
we can fix the over fishing problems, the coral will grow back, and BTW.. there is an ecological balance... the planet self regulates, that is why the climate changes.
it is controversial not because some think nothing has to be done, but that the treaty, in some opinions, won't do a damn thing because it ignores the 3rd world which in the next century will be producing more CO2 and particulate matter than the first world.
umm... no, they called it that because they wanted people to colonize it and not iceland which the ones who discovered it wanted for themselves.
Tell that to the tobacco companies.
Apple still has the right to bring the suit. so what the heck is the argument about?
no you don't.
you reuse the bezel on the case. just remove the front of the drawer on the drive.
as to the GFX card, that is not an apple tax it is a gouge by the card makers. and if you looked at recent cards, the prices are falling in line with the PC cards.
first... it is the point of a law suit to PROVE that he knew. second... even if the kid has an anonymous way for people to submit information. as a journalist it is his duty to make sure he is not breaking the law. and not knowing the exact source is not an excuse for not knowingly passing trade secrets. the quality of the information and even the fact that he had an anonymous info drop is reason enough to know that some of the info received was a tread secret.
bottom line, Apple has a right to its day in court to prove this kid is liable and should be forced to reveal his sources.
actually, no. they is not a Chilling effect on whistle blowers because whistle blowers have special protections under the law.
you are comparing a company killing thousands of people with their technology with a product announcement. are you drunk?
first.. you have to bring a case in order to have a judge decide if you have standing. second, simply breaking a law does not make you a protester of a bad law. you need to have some sort of organization behind you, even if it is made up. you need to report your intentions of breaking the law so people know what you are doing.
if simply breaking the law was all it took to be considered a protester of the law, then murderers would have the largest Lobby in the country.
Ha!!!
first, the fact that you think punctuation on Slashdot is meaningful is stupid.
second... the OP was not circular. and Bill did in fact simply rehash everything the OP was arguing against.
one who simply repeats themself is unintelligent or unprepared and should not be making an argument in the first place which in turn can be construed as stupidity.
dude.. unjust laws have entire movements against them. the law against Murder has more people infringing upon it than the UTSA... so I guess there is a movement to legalize murder?
have you looked in an Apple box lately?
IDE hard drives... ATAPI optical drives... ATI AGP video cards ( I have a GeForce 3 in mine BTW)
so who's accessories and parts am I buying?
so if a journalist gets information that reveals the location of a murder and he then reports on the murder but does not reveal who told him he is immune from prosecution?
sorry but journalists break laws just like normal people and they are liable for them just like normal people.
so Apple is supposed to ask the kid? that is why you bring the law suit!!!.
it is a requirement for liability, not for brining the suit.
so tell me... is Apple with in their rights to prove liability in a court of law or not?
wow... your dumb.
try reading over his post again because everything you spewed is exactly what he was arguing against.
all you did was retell the same argument... sorry but that a rebuttal does not make.
solar heating of water is a more efficient power generating mechanism than Solar cells.
I know... if the last century had been freedom verses tyranny rather than capitalism verse communism I think the world would be full of free states.
unfortunately all we ended up with because of the stupid policies of the cold war was a world full of capitalist tyrannies.
for the sake of the children.... the classic argument of the fascist.
please.... you know what China will do? declare buildings to be schools near cafes.
then there is always the solution of segregating the market into smaller sub regions to be able to handle the demand.