Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Force Mass Closure Of Net Cafes

Chien Andalusia writes "According to this article from the BBC, the Chinese authorities closed 12,575 net cafes towards the end of 2004. Due to the expense of computer hardware, net cafés have become very popular in China in recent years. The laws governing such cafés are very strict, especially in relation to minimising the amount of exposure children can get to the internet. For example, no net café is allowed to open within 200 metres of a middle or elementary school. The article also briefly discusses other restrictions imposed on Chinese net cafés."

497 comments

  1. How ironic... by justkarl · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.

    Probably what the Chinese gov't had to say, too...

    1. Re:How ironic... by dawnlinux · · Score: 1

      Quite right, current net cafes are hard to run in china. Government has strict lows to keep the children from the net cafe.

    2. Re:How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As much as I dont like the goverment censorship in China, I dont really think this an issue about censorship. Its more about the goverment preventing young kids from playing games all day in internet cafes there. I once walked into an internet cafe in China and it was packed with kids playing games, none of them was actually surfing the net. Although this is probably an extream case, but it does give you a better idea what ppl are doing in internet cafes in china.

      There're many ways to get around the goverment firewall/filter, its just a pain in the ass to get around it, but its not too difficult and many ppl are doing it.

  2. Give 'em Alcohol by schestowitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Serve alcohol at the Inertnet cafe and the problem is solved. No controversy either

    --
    My Linux - (L)ove (I)s (N)ever (U)tterly eXPensive
    1. Re:Give 'em Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Serve pot and they don't even need Internet access. They'll just sit quietly grooving to the screen saver.

    2. Re:Give 'em Alcohol by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny
      Serve alcohol at the Inertnet cafe and the problem is solved. No controversy either


      Oh, sure. Cause what we really need is a half a billion or so more drunk people surfing the web and posting stuff on Slashdot. :-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Give 'em Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like that Mac screensaver with the colorful lines?

      Oh man, watching that stoned is amazing.

    4. Re:Give 'em Alcohol by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The one with line of blue dots that bounce accross the screen, and the time displayed in yellow. I spent many bored hours staring at that on the classroom computers in high school.

    5. Re:Give 'em Alcohol by Polarweasel · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah we do! Who's gonna take the place of all the AOL users now that they can't get at Usenet?

    6. Re:Give 'em Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stoned Man 1: Shit, the monkies disappeared... now there's just a picture of a beach.
      Stoned Man 2 sits on keyboard and somehow manages to press the Lock Screen Key.
      And All is well in the Chinese Net Cafe.

    7. Re:Give 'em Alcohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey it's actually Open Source beer!! http://www.voresoel.dk/main.php?id=70

  3. Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suppose it's only a matter of time til the chinese government learns what most people already know. If more than a few people know a piece of information, then it's pretty hopeless to try to contain it.

    Now if only the RIAA/MPAA would learn this lesson.

    1. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by luvirini · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well the point of the restrictions is not really to stop those who do their best to circumvent things. Instead the point is to keep the public at large ignorant. Every society will have it's dissidents, but it is only when a significant proportion of people get dissident that real problems occur for those ruling. That is what the government tries to stop.

    2. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      Yes but most people like to verify information for themselves, else it's just second hand information, a chinese wisper if you like. :P

      --
      moo
    3. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, and what I'm saying, is that once the info's out there, and as long as it's got a important enough value to the people, it's likely to get to them one way or another.

      For instance, don't you think they realize on some level whats REALLY going on, i.e. they're being censored. Upon discovering that, I'd be inheriently curious.. what exactly is it they're protecting me from? And lo, the ball and started rolling...

    4. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now if only the RIAA/MPAA would learn this lesson.

      Must even the most un-related news items be somehow tortured into a reason to self-proclaim one's rights to an artist's work, unpaid-for? Some Chinese citizen sitting in a net cafe "knowing" the news is not the same as you sitting in your living room "knowing" the latest Green Day CD without paying for it.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      I suppose it's only a matter of time til the chinese government learns what most people already know. If more than a few people know a piece of information, then it's pretty hopeless to try to contain it.

      Now if only the RIAA/MPAA would learn this lesson.

      Or more importantly, if only President Bush would learn this lesson. There's no putting the nuclear genie back in the bottle. Diplomacy is the only answer to dealing with nuclear nations like China and North Korea. Sabre-rattling will only result in disaster.

    6. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by luvirini · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but slashdot crowd is hardly your average person on the street. Go ask a a few people on the street some questions about the world, I suggest subjects such as the cosolidation of media, to see how much people on average think about the dangers to free speech.

    7. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by jokumuu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well in general you do have to remember that RIAA is not an organisation for artists rights, it is an organisation for the record companies rights. The difference is huge.

    8. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I think joe average is a bit smarter than we give him credit for. Nothing personal, but we should avoid the social elite attitude if we can in debating such things.

      And dont cite voting Bush into power. I voted for Bush, and that doesnt make me an idiot. And no, I wont justify to people why I did.

    9. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently there are some that want paying for knowledge to be illegal. "Knowing" in the Biblical sense...

      yeah mod me flamebait.

    10. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by grasshoppa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I voted for Bush, and that doesnt make me an idiot

      Yes, actually, it does.

      But certainly, if that doesn't, then your sig does.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    11. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by jokumuu · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well I for one did some tests when I was studying. Part of an introductory politics course was asking people on the streets for their opinnions. I did sneak in a lot of knowledge questions about the questionable sides of society like the procentage of richest people who hold 10% of the total wealth and the procentage of the people who hold 10% lowest. The replies ranged quite far, but the ammount of people who came even to right orders of magnitude were depressignly low. So unfortunately I do have to side with the grandparent.

    12. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I think joe average is a bit smarter than we give him credit for.

      Your opinion is both unpopular and correct.

      Many liberal elitists are (rightly so) the loudest champions of our public school system, yet they love to bemoan the widespread ignorance of the masses, forgetting that the masses in America represent the product of our public school system.

      Ask "Joe Average" about consolidation of media, and he will probably repeat a lot of what his High School civics teacher told him about it. Puzzling out whether that opinion is really all that enlightened... I leave as an exercise to the reader.

    13. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends. I'm sure the chinese government would like to censor music too, ever hear of their cultural revolution?

      Or maybe when the news itself is copyrighted, and they start using copyright as a tool of censorship, then you'll reconsider? It's all just bits and bytes. Arbitrarily deciding that some arrangements of 1s and 0s is music that should land you in jail if you copy it, but that another is current news that it's immoral to censor is somewhat dumb.

    14. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Green Day is a bad example.

      Their music is a rip-off, even for free.

    15. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by quarkscat · · Score: 5, Funny

      No doubt this is the PRC's way of limiting
      the number of dissidents it will have to
      arrest. You can't expect their government to
      build hundreds of new prisons without having
      new labor contracts already signed by Western
      corporations. The PRC government does have
      rudimentary knowledge about supply and demand,
      and staying in the "sweet spot" for labor costs.

    16. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry for pool english.

      Net cafes in China are mostly **GAME** cafes. that's why there is a restriction that no net café is allowed to open within 200 metres of a middle or elementary school.

      In June 2002, a net cafe in Beijing is burned by 3 middle school students for game playing conflicts, 25 people died.

      I just wish you guys to know that closing net cafes has nothing to do with free-speech or free information or other free shits.

      I just hate the blind prejudice and stupid arrogant expressed by some people while talking about something they knew nothing about.

    17. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by luvirini · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I am not talking only about US, and definitely not in specially "elitistic" way. I have been to quite many countries in the all in all, and the same rule seems to hold true in most of them: Most people do not want to think.

    18. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Epistax · · Score: 1, Troll

      We yell at Iran for making nukes, N. Korea for having nukes, and now China for supporting ignorance. It sounds like they take after us quite well.

    19. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

      did you hear that? are you talking about me?

    20. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by jokumuu · · Score: 1

      Ofcourse they do, they need laborers to build the new prisons for when the damand rises.

    21. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by zoftie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Unless a teenager, I rather beg to differ, they have paid for it, maybe at the black market but they did. Now RIAA didn't have their fingers in that pie. And they didn't set the pricing, what a shame.
      my 2c.

    22. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by lawguy2006 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Arbitrarily deciding that some arrangements of 1s and 0s is music that should land you in jail if you copy it, but that another is current news that it's immoral to censor is somewhat dumb. Is it really? Let's try applying your argument to the real, tangible world. Would you argue that taking a TV from Best Buy without paying for it is NOT stealing, because a TV is just a different arrangement of particles than air, which is free for all?

    23. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

      I just hate the blind prejudice and stupid arrogant expressed by some people while talking about something they knew nothing about

      Kind of reminds me of Americas reasons for war

    24. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      what the hell was that? /me looks around.. hrmm must be the bowls, damn that BK!

      --
      moo
    25. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fundamental difference:
      When you steal a TV, the store loses a TV. When you copy an mp3, the other person does not lose an mp3.

    26. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by radja · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so limitting free cultural exchange is good, but limitting free speech is bad?

      both are important, and both should be legal.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    27. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see why you consider that deciding that some 0s and 1s are copyrighted music and some are news is immoral?

      Perhaps we should release our governments secrets and information on terrorist groups on Kazaa, after all they're only 0s and 1s right?

    28. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by beattie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe when the news itself is copyrighted, and they start using copyright as a tool of censorship, then you'll reconsider? It's all just bits and bytes. Arbitrarily deciding that some arrangements of 1s and 0s is music that should land you in jail if you copy it, but that another is current news that it's immoral to censor is somewhat dumb.

      While some may agree with your premise, your argument is bad. Apply the same logic to some other thing. Say pictures. Why are some pictures like pornography censored, and others like pictures of national landmarks not? It's all just pictures, right?

    29. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by sjb2016 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that their answers were wrong because they were confused by your use of the word procentage. Perhaps you would have received more correct answers if you had asked for percentage(s).

    30. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      And if you are Germany or France, the important thing to do is sell the Chinese more weapons to use on their own people.

    31. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      Wow, a haiku... ohwait

    32. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      so limitting free cultural exchange is good, but limitting free speech is bad?

      both are important, and both should be legal.


      Well, sure. But when an artist chooses to sell their work, and someone else chooses to find a way to get it without paying for it, that's not a freedom of speech issue. That's about people wanting the work that the artist produces, and not wanting to pay for it.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    33. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Let's complete your metaphor though: If I build my own TV, arranging the atoms in the exact pattern of a Best Buy TV, am I stealing from Best Buy? Otherwise, you're accusing every napster user of walking into the RIAA and pilfering master tapes, dumbass.

      But when you think about it (after you grow a neocortex from that stumpy little brainstem of yours) you'll realize that metaphors are being used because you're fallaciously comparing apples to oranges. I spoke literally. A downloaded mp3 is literally an arrangement of 1s and 0s, whether thats in a NTFS filesystem on a hard drive, or you etch pits in granite with a stone chisel.

    34. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by lawguy2006 · · Score: 1

      Sure, when you buy a TV, you get both the right to use the TV and the legal title to the underlying property (the TV itself). When you buy an MP3 (e.g., from iTunes), you get some rights to use the MP3 (a license), but you don't get any other property rights in the song itself. The "fundamental difference" of which you speak is really the difference between tangible property rights and intangible property rights (specifically, here, licenses). Just because the "other person" doesn't "lose" the MP3 does not mean that you haven't robbed them of a property interest. You've robbed them of royalties to which they're (legally) entitled for your use of the MP3.

    35. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Right, and what I'm saying, is that once the info's out there, and as long as it's got a important enough value to the people, it's likely to get to them one way or another.

      For instance, don't you think they realize on some level whats REALLY going on, i.e. they're being censored. Upon discovering that, I'd be inheriently curious.. what exactly is it they're protecting me from? And lo, the ball and started rolling...


      Except that they will be labeled as wacho nut jobs, with consipricy abound. The gov't may even actively discredit said person, by planting drugs or child porn or something else, and then making a very public arrest.

    36. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The difference is that filesharing is worse. When you steal one TV, the store loses one TV. When you make one MP3 available for download (i.e. steal it), not only does the artist lose the revenue they would have made on that MP3 if you had gone to the record store and purchased it, they lose ALL the revenue they would have realized from everybody else who downloaded the MP3 for free instead of buying it.

      Saying that filesharing != theft is like saying that I did nothing wrong by walking into a restaurant then urinating on the main course. True, I "stole" nothing. But the restaurant can't sell the urine-soaked main course either.

    37. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you dont have much understanding in a repressive regime such as china.

      (no the USA doesnt count)

    38. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by saider · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Upon discovering that, I'd be inheriently curious.. what exactly is it they're protecting me from?

      Because our society values the freedom to make your own decisions. That's why there's a stink everytime the gov't tries to restrict our expressions.

      In China and other places, the people are brought up believing in the Government as a protector, as a father. Since there is little to contradict this, they believe that the government is acting in their best interests when it tells them not to do something. Because of their lifelong conditioning, they accept this fact and move on with their lives.

      This is how humans in general operate, and because we are conditioned differently in the West, we have a different response to and view of our governments. North Korea is another example of this. There was a show on PBS showing the horrific conditions in the country. The only reason they put up with it is because they honestly feel that South Korea and their imperialist allies will kill each and every one of them. They are in a completely different reality.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    39. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      They are all just pictures. Even kiddy porn was only prosecuted so heavily the last few decades, on the premise that reducing the demand for it would lead to a decrease in child abuse. In that sense, it's not that the pictures are bad, but that people wanting to look at them indirectly leads to crime... a premise that I tend to agree with and support.

      In the USA, pornography itself (of the non-child abuse sort) isn't censored. Just regulated (no one under age 18).

    40. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Znork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For every person exposing the truth, hire ten to malign him, change the issue, confuse the facts, misrepresent his views, misrepresent your views and outright lie and threaten.

      I've realized that I'm being manipulated every day, and I live in a western democracy. Do you know how very difficult it is to discern who is manipulating you in what way, and how they in turn have been manipulated? Do you understand how difficult it is when you cannot even trust your own mind and language, as you will find your very instincts erraneous and the very language biased?

      In your average newspaper and newscast it's almost impossible to find a single unbiased and non-propagandistic article. They're as rare as factually correct articles, and often the two go hand in hand. As journalists no longer appear to have the time, and few the integrity, try to do the factchecking yourself, and trace interests and bias in the article, and compare between different ones.

      It's not that the average person cant form an opinion, understand a problem or draw conclusions from the facts. It's that the average person does not have the time, inclination or opportunity to double-check and cross-reference every fact and opinion they hear and question every belief and opinion they have once they discover inconsistencies. It's not very rewarding or conductive to living a happy life.

      Propaganda works. And you, I and the Chinese get tricked every day.

      What exactly are they protecting you from?

    41. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Dot+Com+Drew · · Score: 1

      Maybe its because I've only been up for six minutes but I couldn't get the movie footloose out of my head when I read the summary. I picture some sort of chinese kevin bacon or maybe the real kevin bacon in china getting everyone to "cut-a foot LOOSE!"

      or not.

      -drew

      --
      This .sig is .false
    42. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      The artist doesn't get crap from the sales. For every album sold, a few dollars goes to the store, about 50 cents goes to the artist in the form of royalties, and the rest goes straight into the RIAA's bank account.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    43. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by sirwnstn · · Score: 1

      I don't know if keeping the public ignorant is the entire purpose of the Chinese government in this case. I have friends who came from the PRC, and they say that the government is pretty open with allowing adults go on the net, read literature, have a religion, etc. But the government there keeps a tight reign on things concerning children. I got the feeling from my friends that the Chinese government is of the mindset: "You can mess with our adults, but don't mess with our kids."

      I can definitely see your point, however. If you fully indoctrinate the kids, you probably won't need to worry about them being dissident when they are adults.

    44. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      I suppose it's only a matter of time til the chinese government learns what most people already know.

      Oh, that's why every successful government on earth controls the mass media, because controlling the mass media isn't effective!

      Wow, imagine all the wasted effort they'll save now that you've let them know!

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    45. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those sorts of 'analysis' always come up low though. Any time a reporter goes onto the street to ask people questions about something (other than what they are thinking about) they always seem to give silly answers. The questioner's head is in one space, the 'random person on the streets' head is in another space. I call it the gentle art of sandbagging. On any given topic, on any given day, you can ask people simple easy questions, and get 10% giving you good responses, and 90% silly. It's not that the people are stupid or ignorant, they are just focussed on something else. It's much like how cell phones can screw up an otherwise perfectly capable driver.

    46. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Bah. Compare CNN news feed and BBC news feed (off NPR) sometime. It doesn't have to be the government censoring stories to give the public a really screwed up view of the world around them...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    47. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or people complaints about it...

    48. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....Upon discovering that, I'd be inheriently curious.. what exactly is it they're protecting me from? And lo, the ball and started rolling...

      Don't you mean: "...And lo, the tanks started rolling..."

    49. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by adamfranco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In your average newspaper and newscast it's almost impossible to find a single unbiased and non-propagandistic article. They're as rare as factually correct articles, and often the two go hand in hand. As journalists no longer appear to have the time, and few the integrity, try to do the factchecking yourself, and trace interests and bias in the article, and compare between different ones.

      For a scholarly look at this issue read Edward Herman & Noam Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. In it they describe in detail many, many examples how "the powers that be" in the U.S. of A. have used the structure of the mass media to distort the world view of the citizens of this [USA] country.

      What exactly are they protecting you from?

      As far as I can tell, the nature of Power is such that for the most part, those with it want to keep it. Additionally, money and influence are both part of and equivalent to Power. With [enough] money you can buy influence and with [enough] influence you can obtain money. In order to retain Power those with it must ensure not that the populace is well off, but that they are content enough that they do not rebel or otherwise try to overthrow those in Power.

      As much as the United States is a democracy, true democracy (in which all have a generally equal say) is impossible if there is a large concentration of Power (money and/or influence). If Power is not [relatively] evenly spread, then those with it can get a larger say by either force or by manipulating those without Power into agreeing with them.

      So, what exactly are they protecting you from? In general, feelings of dissatisfaction with the state of your world (as it reflects on them) and your place in it. This manipulation can come in many forms, but several common ones that are repeated over and over are:

      - Enemies: Enemies focus attention away from domestic problems to external entities, as well as providing a framework for "Be happy, at least you aren't in xxxxxx" comments.

      - "Mindless" Entertainment: The more entertained you are, the less likely you are to rebel. "The Matrix" is an extreme example of this.

      - Playing on dreams: The "American Dream" is partially summarized as the opportunity of anyone who "works hard enough" to climb the economic and social ladders. In the current day and age (as well as many past) this is no more true than elsewhere in the world. A very few people truly go from "rags to riches" while the rest of us stay plus or minus a few degrees from the place where we were born. The promise of the "American Dream" is repeated so often though that most people take it to be truth, thereby voting for tax cuts for the rich on the belief that they will soon be rich too.

      These and other tools can and are used by those with Power to protect the rest of us from the harsh truth that we are being cheated and our situation would be better if those with Power didn't have it.

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    50. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Whew! It's a good thing for you that you don't make a living off of information that you personally create. You'd have a hard time justifying the paycheck.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    51. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by forgetful_ca · · Score: 1

      I don't know who you think you are, mister, but intelligent, thoughtful answers aren't looked upon very kindly around here. You better snap out of it.

    52. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      So, let's see. An artist works their heart out to produce a CD. It's great, and they sell 100,000 copies. That's a good sales record, but a lot of artists to a lot better.

      100,000 CDs at (say) $15.00 each retail. That's $1,500,000 going into that part of the economym which is a good thing regardless. The retail employees make money, the shippers make money, the local jurisdiction gets some tax revenue - all are stimulated by the transaction. But let's get back to the artis. The standard rate is around $0.08 per track. Assume a 10-track CD (though many are bigger, of course), and a typical 7% "points" clause on the gross sale of the CD. That works out to more than $1.50 per CD for the artist. But, let's round DOWN for the sake of argument. Say they only get $1.00. That's more money ($100,000) than most people make in a year, and doesn't take into account the revenue they also make from tie-in licensing, touring, t-shirt sales, and all the rest. The CD-sales-only part, if a very modestly successful artist sells only that many CDs, is a decent living.

      When an artist gets more popular, and sells half a million recordings, they're doing pretty well. Of course, if everyone just distrbutes pirated copies of the artist's work onlone, they get nothing.

      The artist doesn't get crap from the sales.

      I'm kind of amazed that your theory is: since they don't make a lot of money when a CD is sold, there's no point giving them anything at all. You must really hate musicians, huh? Or like making them work for you for free? That's real nice of you. You're also forgetting that most artists wouldn't sell more than a few CDs at their local bar gig if they didn't have a record company producing, promoting, and getting their material out there in front of a lot of people.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    53. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by rednip · · Score: 1

      Record company execs are artists, bullsh*t artists, that's a type of artist!

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    54. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Well the point of the restrictions is not really to stop those who do their best to circumvent things. Instead the point is to keep the public at large ignorant.
      Yes, and each country has their own institutions to do that, like, for example, in the USA: ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, FOX...
    55. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Do you understand how difficult it is when you cannot even trust your own mind and language, as you will find your very instincts erraneous and the very language biased?
      You do not realize how ++ungood it is to hold such language???
    56. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Fortmain · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. Anyone relying on Noam Chomsky for their arguments is neither intelligent nor thoughtful.

      --

      We gotta make democracy safe for the world! -- Pogo
    57. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      And if you are Germany or France, the important thing to do is sell the Chinese more weapons to use on their own people.
      That's not worse than the US selling poison gas to Saddam so he can gas the kurds and iranians...
    58. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by QMO · · Score: 1

      I would suspect that anyone that "comes from" the PRC to the west is of the richest in the country. Sweatshop wages aren't usually appealing to people that can afford trans-oceanic air travel, nor do such wages usually allow such travel.

      Thus I'm not inclined to accept information from the average PRC expatriate as if it came from an average PRC citizen.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    59. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by clean_stoner · · Score: 1
      I know this is cheesey and crappy, but your post reminded me of this song (of which I've only posted a portion).

      Open your eyes
      To the millions of lies
      That they tell you everyday
      Open your mind
      To the clever disguise
      That the advertisements say

      ... ...

      Destroy all the land
      And kill what you can
      Just to make the profits rise
      They sell you from birth
      For all that you're worth
      The money spreads like lies

      And how do they know what's good for you?

      Taken from "Open Your Eyes" by Goldfinger

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

    60. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ultranova · · Score: 1

      So, instead of having blind prejudice about this being another example of communist China's censorship, we should have blind faith in the word of an Anonymous Coward, who's saying that Chinese are insane arsonists with no self-control or sense of proportion and that's why these cafes are being shut down ?

      Makes sense, let's mod parent informative.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    61. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by maxpuppy · · Score: 0

      All you have to do is hum a protected tune. Actually all you would have to do is play the tune in your mind to be guilty.

    62. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      For a scholarly look at this issue read Edward Herman & Noam Chomsky's

      You should be aware that Noam Chomsky is far, far, far from an objective source on the material presented in the book. To characterize Mr. Chomsky as slightly left of center would be be similar to saying Hitler was just a tad right of center. This is not to be construed as calling Mr. Chomsky the equivalent of Hitler, it is merely to point out Chomsky's politics, which are decidedly anti-capitalist, pro-socialist to begin with.

      To see a book written by Mr. Chomsky come to the conclusion that capitalism is bad, wealth and thatpower must be "evenly distributed" is about as surprising as hearing water is wet. It should not be taken as any sort of real justification for Mr. Chomsky's position any more than Rush Limbaugh's books are justification for his position. Both represent rather extremist views.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    63. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by QMO · · Score: 1

      Quote: "every successful government on earth"

      I think that the US government can be said to be successful, as far as having influence within and without its borders.

      If you think that the US government controls mass media in the US than you've probably been watching (reading, listening to) too much advertising, and have forgotten it's all about selling soap.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    64. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ShortedOut · · Score: 2

      Great post Znork!

      The best test of propaganda is if the subjects being manipulated have no idea that they're being manipulated.

      Then, when confronted by the truth, will go in denial that they had ever been misled.

      That's what absolutlely terrifies me of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (NK), they have no clue as to what reality is.

      Then again, who really knows what reality is when we're not in a position to question, or get answers.

      I hate to bring up the elections again, but people honestly believe that they found WMD's in Iraq, and that Iraq had active terrorist camps.

      They also believe that someone's Alabama national guard service is more honorable than someone's Vietnam service.

      I guess Michael Moore made it even, but he was FAR less effective than the Bush campaign was.

      My point is, I'm agreeing with you. We're all tricked and you don't have to be Chinese, Iranian, or North Korean.

      Maybe it's better to unplug and don't worry about any of it.

    65. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by RWerp · · Score: 1

      They also believe that someone's Alabama national guard service is more honorable than someone's Vietnam service.

      Or, that being a good boat commander doesn't make you a good president.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    66. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1
      Frankly, the reason why nobody in the US knows this socialist propaganda is because we just don't care. It isn't any of my business how much money someone else has, nor is it my business to tell them what to do with their money. That is why it is called THEIR MONEY, and not OUR MONEY.

      If the people of China are feeling the same way, good for them. Maybe they will finally figure out that the only people who need babysitting are government bureacrats.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    67. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The documentary, in the PBS "Wide Angle" series, was called "State of Mind", by the same director who did a documentary on the North Korea soccer team who went to the world finals in the 1960's.

      http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/shows/northkor ea /

    68. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Alas, you are right. They do live in somewhat of a different reality than we do, which I do believe is quite unfortunate.

      I just wish there was a way to "un-program" them. Of course, from their point of view, this would be "capatalist brainwashing". I'd like to think that we're on the right side of things.. but how can we know ?

    69. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Darby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I voted for Bush, and that doesnt make me an idiot.

      It either makes you an idiot, or completely amoral.
      There really are no other options if you honestly think it through.

    70. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly... who are we to say our values--freedom of expression, questioning authority, democracy, capitalism--are inherently better than theirs? I know where I'd rather live, but that doesn't give me the right to preach to them about the way they live. (Excepting those who wish they lived in a more open society, of whom China has many, as we do here in the Western world.)

      Of course, it's misguided to imagine that people starving in North Korea, say, or jailed for political dissidence in Zimbabwe, are doing so voluntarily, out of love of their governments.

      Interesting topic.

    71. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Darby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To characterize Mr. Chomsky as slightly left of center would be be similar to saying Hitler was just a tad right of center.

      Bad example.
      Hitler was an extreme Leftist.
      Mussolini would be the one that you're looking for, he was an extreme Rightist (pretty damn close to the same degree as the current American administration).

      Apart from the whole holocaust thing ( which I'm not belittling, it just isn't relevant to the left/right distinction ) there really isn't much of a difference between the two which should be a warning to everybody about the dangers of extemists of whatever ilk.

    72. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most artists don't make ANY money from CDs as advertisement and distribution costs are subtracted from their royalties.

    73. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      You're attacking this guy for contributing his perspective to the discussion?

      In case you're actually interested, as opposed to just trying to make a point, here's a CNN article about the fire.

    74. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go again propagating propaganda about P2Ps hurting sales, where there aren't any conclusive studies to prove they affects sales. Sure there are studies showing P2Ps hurt sales and those showing the opposite, but who you believe depends on your agenda.

      The reality is despite P2Ps, sales have remained unchanged, and increases or decreases mostly depend on economic conditions.

      The fact is people do want stuff for free, but they also want to support the artists; however, the people ripping off artists aren't their fans, but the people in their ivory towers who own 99% of the distribution networks. You can't release your great art without paying their tolls.

      Sharing isn't immoral despite your rhetoric. Nevertheless, boycotting is much a better solution than sharing and advertising for free. Why don't you and the media cartels advocate for boycotting of posting unauthorized materials on P2P instead of for banning P2P altogether?

      Back in the days of the cassette tapes, people were encouraged to make copies, but you didn't hear anything about "people wanting the work that the artist produces, and not wanting to pay for it."

    75. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, because elementary school students couldn't possibly walk 200 meters to burn down their cyber-cafes.

    76. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You're attacking this guy for contributing his perspective to the discussion?

      I'm not attacking anyone. I'm pointing out that the grandparent does not deserve "informative" mod due to the fact that he's not giving any kind of evidence for his words.

      In case you're actually interested, as opposed to just trying to make a point, here's a CNN article about the fire.

      Thank you, this proves that there's been a fire. However, it doesn't mention the cause ("An investigation into the cause of the fire was under way"), and mentions a similar event (people being unable to get out) at a discotheque in Luoyang in December 2000 (which implies that this problem is not limited to net cafes, making safety an unlike reason to target specifically them). Therefore, the grandparents claims are still unproven.

      Furthermore, the article specifically says that this cafe "drew large numbers of students by offering cheaper Internet access rates late at night", so the parents implications about the shut-down cafes being **GAME** cafes (which in itself was prejudiced, stupid and arrogant - exactly what the grandparent was accusing other posters for being) are clearly not correct in this case - which means that he was talking about something he knew nothing about, another accusation laid by him against others...

      An AC post that makes several erraneous claims, gives no proof of them, and accuses others of various things that the post itself then mimics, does not deserve "informative", since it contains no information. It deserves "troll".

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    77. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not surprise to see you guys relate this kind of topic to political issue and human rights, but the truth is basicly ,this policy has nothing to do with politics.

      I am a Chinese student now studying in United Kingdom. For banning internet café even in China's mess media and net-sphere, there are some different voices. Let me tell you, during the night, what kind of place this cafés are. Generally , if you ware in China two or three years ago ,every time when the time went to midnight , you can see a crowed of teenagers ware happy playing in the café , they went home /school dorm around the morning time. After they had a enough sleep they came back again. This like a ritual having been repeated over and over again and almost in very city you can see this phenomenon.

      What I experienced was when I was a college student, my roommate went out to internet café every night and doing nothing with their course work. When the final exam comes they get reasonable results, which is fail. I had at least 4 classmates got failed to go to next grade; some heavy internet gamer even got dismissed. After I graduated fromm College, I heard a shocked news, one student who enrolled in the university in same year as me committed suicide (jumped down from the top of our dormitory) just because he got dismissed. he couldn't catch up the others (he should graduate at the same time as me , but because he failed too many courses he couldn't ). That is all online gaming and internet café's fault.

      The other story was reported on newspaper there was a college student in Beijing spent his most of money and time on online gaming, however his poor father sold his blood to support son's living expense and tuition fees. Can you image such things happen around you, you can still keep a good image on online gaming and internet café. For younger secondary school student the situation was even worse.
      All in all, I am glad to see our government did this for us, for our young generation.

    78. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Epistax · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, this is not a troll. I'm not looking for an argument and everything I've stated is true. You can't mod something down just because you don't like it. (Well you can, but it sure isn't nice).

    79. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by adamfranco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...merely to point out Chomsky's politics, which are decidedly anti-capitalist, pro-socialist to begin with.

      The point is acknowledged that Chomsky is far from "centrist", extremely so in fact.

      To see a book written by Mr. Chomsky come to the conclusion that capitalism is bad, wealth and thatpower must be "evenly distributed" is about as surprising as hearing water is wet.

      Please note that the views about Power/money/influence beginning with As far as I can tell, the nature of Power... are my own. If Mr. Chomsky has expressed similar views then I applaud him for reaching similar conclusions in his own inquiries into the state of the world.

      Nowhere in my reading of Manufacturing Consent (MC) did I see any any anti-capitalist references. The only place MC comments on "even distribution of power" (that I noticed) is in discussing the 1984 elections in Guatemala. Chomsky and Herman question how meaningful elections could be in a state where power is concentrated in the hands of an authoritarian junta that has just executed or "disappeared" most of the journalists, political rivals, and judiciary in the country. I have not read any of Chomsky's other writings, so I cannot speak on them.

      Nice sig: So let me ask you: are you more proud of your ignorance or your bias?

      The question implies that ignorance and bias go together and encourages the reader to fix the bias by fixing the ignorance. I heartily agree with this viewpoint, which is part of why I found reading MC so interesting, even IF the the author's positions are in some way as baseless as those of Limbaugh. The important thing is to gather one's information from a variety of independent sources (including direct observation where possible) so that one can make informed opinions and choices about the world.

      Though Rush pushes this limit, I do not believe that anyone can lie and misrepresent in everything that they say. Included in the deception are little scraps of truth buried in page B17, Appendix 25, or in what things one observes at events first hand, but are not said by others reporting on the event or using that event to push their agenda.

      Your post induced me to read up on Mr. Chomsky as I didn't know much about the man or his views aside from reading one of his books. Wikipedia has a very in-depth article that discusses many points of view on the man and the cult of personality surrounding him. As with everything, somewhere amongst the words of critics and of followers lie small truths. That he (or any other person) is a lier and propagandist or an insightful thinker that cares more about ideals than opinion is something one must discover for one's self and is not something just to take a single source's word for.

      More thoughts on capitalism, wealth, and power:

      As they are by definition made up by more than one person, all societies are by definition compromises between the desires of their members. Various societies try to balance these desires by employing various economic systems. In a [completely fictional] utopia all people would be able to have anything that they want and never have to deal with fulfilling desires of others that conflict with their own. As the world is finite conflicts do arise and economic systems are employed to work these conflicts out. The general hope (I believe) is that the chosen economic system will provide a basis for supporting the other ideals of a society; be they listed in the US Bill of Rights or others such as a right to education, a right to health care, or a right to choose to garden in the nude. What ever they are, these ideals of a society provide the framework for discourse and function within it.

      I have no problem with laizes-faire capitalism, regulated capitalism, socialism, communism, or any other economic system as long as the chosen one[s] allows the ideals of my society to flourish internally. The problem I have is

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    80. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your stupid analogy only works if you already paid for the meal, because if you haven't, then you're destroying the restaurant's physical property. If you did pay for the meal, they already sold the urine-soaked main course, so they're not losing any money directly. (assume you kept it all on the main course and didn't spray everything in the restaurant, which would inflict labor costs for cleanup)

      Then the only cost to the restaurant is the possible loss of business from people who are so horrified by your display that they leave instead of eating there. That is actualy somewhat analogous to how filesharing hurts the RIAA.

      But nice work making a post about urinating on your meal in a restaurant and still getting modded up, ya scatalogical bastard.

    81. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      There you go again propagating propaganda about P2Ps hurting sales, where there aren't any conclusive studies to prove they affects sales. Sure there are studies showing P2Ps hurt sales and those showing the opposite, but who you believe depends on your agenda.

      But it doesn't matter what the agenda is! The artist... the actual musician, the person whose music you're listening to... has specifically said: "don't take my music without paying for it." What's not clear about that? Who cares if it impacts one sale, a million, or none? By not agreeing to the artist's terms, your violating that artist's wishes. If you hate the artist's wishes that much, how can you like the music that person produces?

      The reality is despite P2Ps, sales have remained unchanged, and increases or decreases mostly depend on economic conditions.

      Again, so what? That doesn't change the fact that the artist says: "don't do that with my music."

      The fact is people do want stuff for free, but they also want to support the artists; however, the people ripping off artists aren't their fans, but the people in their ivory towers who own 99% of the distribution networks. You can't release your great art without paying their tolls.

      You mean, like the woman who just won a Grammy last night for her album, which was self-produced and released entirely and only for sale online without a record company involved? Of course, if people start ripping her off, and not paying what she's asking, she won't have a trade association's lawyers to help defend her rights. She'll just lose money, lose her interest in that method of distribution, and probably go right back to a record company. But you pretending that musicians can't get their work out by other means is nonsense, and you know it. Get a better argument, as that one's BS.

      Sharing isn't immoral despite your rhetoric.

      It is if, when you bought the work in question, you agreed not to do it. And if you ever have actually bought a CD, then you have (by definition) done just that. If you're saying you're not smart enough to read the label, where the artist says "my work is copyrighted," that's one thing. Or, if you know about the terms the artist wants, and you're deliberately, in effect, lying as you buy the CD, that's another thing. At least we all know you're lying about your respect for the artist's wishes, then. And when you do buy it, and spread it all over the internet, you're deliberately cheating on the artist with whom you just entered into that agreement. Don't like the agreement? Then admit that you don't like the artist who wants you to USE that agreement! Still want to hear the music? Wow - you're in a dilema, aren't you! Guess you'll have to actually buy the music, or admit that you're willing to rip the artist off.

      Why don't you and the media cartels advocate for boycotting of posting unauthorized materials on P2P instead of for banning P2P altogether?

      How can a record company "boycott" a P2P network that's ripping them off? You boycott someone by refusing to buy something from them. P2P networks aren't selling anything, they're largely used to avoid paying for things. You've got it completely backwards. Do you mean that the artists should just refuse to create any more music until the P2P users agree to stop ripping them off? I don't see that happening.

      Back in the days of the cassette tapes, people were encouraged to make copies, but you didn't hear anything about "people wanting the work that the artist produces, and not wanting to pay for it."

      Actually, you're exactly, completely wrong about that. There was considerable concern in the recording industry that cassette copying was going to hurt record sales. This turned out to be less of a threat because the copies were notoriously lousy sounding, and hard to make in large quantities without investing industrial equipment. And the only people investing in that equipment were people setting u

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    82. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Who are we to say that our open-minded attitude about freedom of expression is right for the rest of the world? It's almost as if freedom was a universal human right or something.

      And for goodness sakes, if you can't detect the sarcasm in above, please THINK about it awhile.

    83. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by bob+beta · · Score: 2, Informative

      For a scholarly look at this issue read Edward Herman & Noam Chomsky's...

      I will just post a parallel comment, to point out that Chomsky is an expert in the field of Linguistics, and thus his non-linguistic works are not 'scholarly' but, rather, are polemical.

      I'm posting this because the 'other' main reply seems to have turned into a redbaiting/reaction-to-redbaiting thread.

      Chomsky simply isn't a qualified expert outside the field of linquistic. Just a verbose idealogue. He leverages his knowledge of rhetoric quite well.

    84. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      I'm not attacking anyone. I'm pointing out that the grandparent does not deserve "informative" mod due to the fact that he's not giving any kind of evidence for his words.

      And you're posting what you have to say with your 'No Karma Bonus' box not checked off.

      Hmmmm...

    85. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      And it's not better, either.

    86. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Well, there's many kinds of freedom. You and I value freedom of speech as a fundamental human right, because that's how we've been raised. Not every culture values freedom of expression as an absolute good.

      Citizens of Germany, for example, seem perfectly happy trading their freedom of speech in return for the freedom from having to see neo-Nazi propaganda in public. I personally wouldn't agree, but it's their choice.

    87. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

      100,000 CDs at (say) $15.00 each retail. That's $1,500,000 going into that part of the economym which is a good thing regardless. The retail employees make money, the shippers make money, the local jurisdiction gets some tax revenue - all are stimulated by the transaction. ...Say they only get $1.00. That's more money ($100,000) than most people make in a year, and doesn't take into account the revenue they also make from tie-in licensing, touring, t-shirt sales, and all the rest. The CD-sales-only part, if a very modestly successful artist sells only that many CDs, is a decent living.

      That's rather unrealistic math if you are on a major label, those type of returns are possible on an Indie label you or maybe your best buddy owns with a very favorable(rare) distribution deal through a major label.

      You see, the fees that the record companies take out for everything come out of the artist "share" of those proceeds, on a good day they make .75, some bands that sold more than 300,000 copies of their first record like (ahem) Nirvana, actually ended up owing money to the record label their first couple years ever after 300K+ in sales. If they were smart they hung on to royalty for use rights & publishing rights, but most musicians don't realize they are worth that much and sign those away as well.

      Even at your math and assuing they by some marvel of being on an Indie actually got $1.00 per CD when it was said and done, the $100,000 would be before tax and split between however many members are in the band, assuming the artist didn't hire out (ala Michael Jackson) 100% for session players at $51.50 an hour.

      T-shirt sales are usually tied in to the record company, and even more distateful, most clubs are now demanding (even the major venues) a percentage (usually 40-50%) of merchandise sales at clubs. Most clubs even set up beer back stage that is charges by the bottles you drink just like the mini-bars in hotel rooms, they just do the accounting at the end of the night. The food is never free either. Nor is the soundman, the lightman, and some places the band and not the club is responsible to pay for the doormen and security (understandable if you are a gansta rapper, not as understandable if you are adult contemp).

      It's not an easy gig being a professional musician if your goal is mass sales. It's a better gig if you find a small secure niche and stay in it.

      My brothers band made 2-3x as much selling 1/3 as many records on their Indie label as they did on Geffen with #1 and #3 and #4 hits in several world markets during the Geffen period to boot. Not only did they make more money, but no $175,000 videos that never get rotation coming out of their salary, no mega expensive thousand dollar a day tour busses, no catered at $300 a plate shrimp either. Not that Geffen did much other than waste their money promotional wise. Yeah, they could give away a few thousand more copies of your music and if you are Michael Jackson blackmail your way onto MTV, but that 2nd one doesn't happen unless you are Michael Jackson. You pay for the promo copies. The only real advantage the majors have is their "company" stations that they can legally buy playola on. You sell a few more records, but you have to sell 5-10X as many to make up for the costs incurred to break even.

      They typically played 500-3000 seat holes before Geffen, mostly 700-4000 size holes on Geffen, and when they dropped Geffen a few years later they are still playing 500-3000 seat holes ...right where they started without the major label, major headache, and major expense.

      Giving away MP3's/OGG files doesn't have to cost you sales, it can be a very effective promotional tool if it's done right. For bands that are on the cusp between radio play and not getting radio play, those MP3's may be the only way they can tap into new markets and draw new fans both to shows & to buy albums. It worked well for Wilco, albeit they had a good following

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    88. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      And we show exactly how open minded we are and how we love freedom of speech so much. Like when the FCC levies fines for an exposed boob.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    89. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by snuf23 · · Score: 1
      Check this article out for a better break down of what artists make vs. the record company:


      The Problem with Music by Steve Albini


      Steve Albini should know a little about this stuff, he produced Nirvana's In Utero. He was also a member of the band Big Black in the '80s (any Ministry fans should give them a listen) and worked with bands such as the Pixies and the Breeders as well as Seattle stuff like Tad.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    90. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by spare.dave · · Score: 1

      Go talk to your average mainland Chinese on the street about history, politics, and current events. For a laugh, ask them about Tibet or Taiwan.

      Then tell me how hopeless it is to try and contain information.

    91. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is nothing wrong with preaching to governments that they are not according their people sufficient rights. A lot of people talk about "self-determination," by which they mean that governments themselves should be allowed to dictate how people live with absolute impunity. I would prefer a world where "self-determination" means that the people themselves can choose how to live, and if that means denouncing a government for their oppressive actions, so be it. Freedom is almost tautologically better than the alternative. You might disagree, but if you are free to do so, you are benefitting from it anyway. Freedom is the only system that doesn't force any values on you.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    92. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Ah, the good ol' U.S. of A. Baseball, Mom's Apple Pie, a psychopath on the button, and a good given right to be an ignorant dumbass because you "just don't care!" Where the hell is Nero when he need him? I swear, I don't know if I should be ashamed to share a country with you, or thank the gods that I don't think like you.

    93. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1

      I am embarrassed to know that there are still socialists like you in this country who still don't get that all rights are property rights, and intent on trolling your propaganda into any venue. Mod parent down.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    94. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      Bad example.
      Hitler was an extreme Leftist.


      Hitler was against Communism, and Communism is an ideology generally regarded as pretty far left. His regime is largely regarded as fascist, and fascism is generally regarded as pretty far right. However, Hitler's Germany did indeed practice a form of government similar to Socialism, where the government controlled production. I agree Mussolini would've been a better choice, but Hitler was not a leftist.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    95. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Darby · · Score: 1

      Hitler was against Communism, and Communism is an ideology generally regarded as pretty far left.

      That's certainly true, but just because somebody hates something doesn't mean that they are not that thing.

      His regime is largely regarded as fascist, and fascism is generally regarded as pretty far right.

      And

      However, Hitler's Germany did indeed practice a form of government similar to Socialism, where the government controlled production.

      These two statements seem to directly contradict each other.

      Government controlling production is Leftist, Business controlling government is Rightist.
      In reality, the differences are pretty trivial once you hit certain extremes. It's really more like a circle than a line where the extreme right and left are basically the same point on the circle.

      Hitler was not a leftist

      I'm still unconvinced of this for the reasons I gave above.

    96. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      You should be aware that Noam Chomsky is far, far, far from an objective source on the material presented in the book.

      And your point is what, exactly? I couldn't care less what his political leanings are, and you shouldn't either, so long as his arguments are well thought out and proven with *evidence*. Of course, he has probably stacked the deck in his favour (as does any documentarian), but that just puts the onus on you to further research the topic and find additional evidence which proves or disproves him.

      Yeesh... the real problem is people use a person's politics as an excuse to disregard their arguments and evidence, no matter how compelling, and then proceed to attack the messenger rather than the message itself. Not that this is new... I'm sure Micheal Moore has much to say on the topic. But, it's a lot easier to appeal to someone's emotions rather than their intellect (which is, incidentally, a good summary of the difference between Limbaugh and Chomsky).

    97. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Good call. Care must be taken not to confuse government with culture and society at large.

    98. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I mock you for your willfull ignorance, and you counter that I'm a socialist?

      Hate to point this out to you, bunky. "The enemy of my enemy is not my friend." Which means that I can loathe socialism as much as you do and still think you're a redneck asswipe.

    99. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1

      If you don't think that a person's money belongs to them rather than 'all the poor people'. You are a socialist, pure and simple. That ain't redneck, bub, that's just American.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
    100. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      If you don't think that a person's money belongs to them rather than 'all the poor people'. You are a socialist, pure and simple.

      Funny, I don't recall saying that I ever DID think that. In fact, I'm quite certain I didn't.
      YOU said that I think that, which just proves again that you haven't the slightest idea what you're talking about.

      That ain't redneck, bub, that's just American.

      As far as at least 50% of the population goes, the line is fine enough to be easily missed.

    101. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      The right side of things? After all is said and done, the CIA thinks in terms of strict power relationships as much as any government does.

      Look at America. Americans can't even 'unprogram' themselves. They will put up with the rape of women in El Salvador, the 'collateral (sp?)' murders of civilians... all if they think it's for a purpose.

      It's not that we're on the right side of things, as much as we're on the more enjoyable side of things.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    102. Re:Sigh, Freedom of speech out the window by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

      And your point is what, exactly? I couldn't care less what his political leanings are, and you shouldn't either, so long as his arguments are well thought out and proven with *evidence*.

      Very true. However...

      Of course, he has probably stacked the deck in his favour

      Ah, now we come to the crux of the issue and my problem with the original poster's reliance on Chomsky's book for information. A slanted "documentarian" isn't a documentarian if he picks and chooses his data to fit a preconceived conclusion, he's merely editorializing at that point. You can claim Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" is an excellent piece of documentation, but Moore picks only the worst moments of his subjects, ignores anything that conflicts with his worldview, and presents data in such a way that the viewer isn't merely nudged into a particular viewpoint, he's (figuratively) violently shoved that way. Calling such works "documentaries" is an insult to objective scientific documentarians.

      Chomsky's work may be bolstered by all sorts of fact and figures, but that means very little to me. The tobacco industry is legendary for citing all kinds of facts and studies proving that tobacco isn't habit forming and isn't dangerous to your health and the health of those around you. Should I consider the tobacco industry a "documentarian" source worthy of consideration when I'm trying to decide whether I should take up smoking? Of course not. They have a vested interest in me becoming a nicotine addict, and their entire business model depends on millions of such people being addicts to a destructive habit. Again, to even consider such a biased source as anything above propaganda is irresponsible.

      Consider the following case: if Chomsky were researching a book about politics, class struggles, and so forth, and he came across a set of data conflicting with his worldview, what do you think he'd do? Cite it? Or go find a different source of data that didn't conflict. I feel fairly confident he'd do the latter, since that's all he's done during his entire professional career. Citing him as a source of any information or subject relating to politics is naive. It's like asking Rush Limbaugh to write an objective biography on Howard Dean.

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  4. Yay communism by Nastard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because it's important that we limit, as much as is possible, our children's exposure to information, education, technology, or anything else that might shape them into better, more productive members of society.

    China: The Biggest Red State.

    1. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China: The Biggest Red State.

      But not the worst. Just remember what North Korea is like. At least they have SOME access to the outside world in China.

    2. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have your history wrong. The Democrats "moved left" to prevent the Socialists from taking over. Is this what you have a problem with? Current Republicans certainly are not for "smaller government" so it seems like the Republicans also "moved left."

      Do you actually have a point or are you bashing for the sake of bashing?

      Also, learn to spell. Adjective: Democratic. Noun: Democrat. The adjective "Democratic" modifies the noun "Party." Nouns do not modify nouns.

    3. Re:Yay communism by web_angel_tr · · Score: 0

      > or anything else that might shape them into better, more productive members of society.

      Are you not aware of how many sick things can be found on the net? The article clearly states that they are trying to ban the bad stuff not the good stuff which can help in making the kids grow up into better people.

      I don't know if it's a good or bad thing to try to censorship the internet but there are sure as hell a lot of things we could do without on the net.

      --
      There is no such thing as gravity. The Earth just sucks.
    4. Re:Yay communism by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're confusing the Chinese government with Communism here. What's happening in China isn't due to Communism, but the powers that be in China, and their specific doctrine.

    5. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometime during the 60's/70's the Democratic party objected to being 'Red' specifically due to the color's association with Communism. After that, the media switched the color representation so that instead of Democrats being 'Red' and Republicans being 'Blue', we have todays setupe with Republicans being 'Red' and Democrats being 'Blue'.

    6. Re:Yay communism by aelbric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Are you not aware of how many sick things can be found on the net? The article clearly states that they are trying to ban the bad stuff not the good stuff which can help in making the kids grow up into better people."

      It is NOT ANY governments' responsibility to protect you or anyone else from "bad" ideas. This is the very definition of censorship. If you have kids it is YOUR responsibility to educate them about the "bad" stuff out there.

      People do not gain the ability to cope with the horrors, scam artists, predators, morons, and evil people in the world by sticking their heads in the sand. Or by having someone else (the government) stick your head in the sand for you. Those things will not go away. Understanding them is the only way to combat them or defend yourself against them. Otherwise you just become another sheep in the herd.

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
    7. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Reagan was "blue", or were you not old enough to remember the anchor talking about a "Blue Sea" spreading across the country? In 2000 either CBS or the WashPost had the Republicans as Blue and the Democrats as Red. George Will's book has finalized the "color scheme" (as it were) for a while now.

    8. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you say 'Its not any government responsibility' or protect children from bad things ?

      How about most of the states in US of A made laws to move gambling centers to isolated locations ?

      How about US laws to limit how far strip clubs/centers can be located from residential areas..?

      What is chinese govt doing in this particular case is no different from what we do here in US (or most of the other countries)..

      So move along..

    9. Re:Yay communism by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a true statement. Communism does not, in theory, require censoring information, oppressing people, and opposing all change and progress. But for some reason, whenever and wherever it has been implemented, it has involved these things.

      Perhaps it's because the rigid top-down political structure that always seems to accompany it lends itself to these kind of abuses. Perhaps it's that people who implement communism feel that the common man is too stupid to be trusted, and must be censured and controlled.

      Whatever the reason, that fact that these things always seem to be associated with communism does indicate that they're connected.

    10. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they do, and what they should do are two entirely different things. As a conservative (a real conservative, not like the "CONservatives" who have hijacked my former party) I don't want the government telling strip joints where they can be located. The free market will decide if they should be located deep in residential areas.

    11. Re:Yay communism by web_angel_tr · · Score: 1

      "It is NOT ANY governments' responsibility to protect you or anyone else from "bad" ideas. This is the very definition of censorship. If you have kids it is YOUR responsibility to educate them about the "bad" stuff out there."

      Agreed. What i was trying to point out was that there infact are bad things on the internet. It's not only good things you can find there to educate you and your children etc..

      --
      There is no such thing as gravity. The Earth just sucks.
    12. Re:Yay communism by dave420 · · Score: 1
      I think it's more to do with human nature. Communism, to survive, needs people acting together for the common good. When one person in a communist group acts with their own interests first, communism stops working so well. I imagine they need to control these people to ensure the true communist behaviour, or at least as they see it.

      Communism, when practiced properly, can be pretty cool. I'm more of a socialist, though ;)

    13. Re:Yay communism by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Just had a follow-up to my previous thought:

      Maybe it's because the only "Communist" states we see are also totalitarian regimes? I think if you look at ALL totalitarian regimes throughout history, you'll see censorship being the most common trait. It even extends to the current US administration (they use censorship quite often, the most high-profile use in recent years was the "no coffins" rule from the Pentagon).

      So, I think censorship is more of a totalitarian trait than a communist one.

    14. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sell crack cocaine let me ofter to you sir my applause.

    15. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's your choice. I'm going to choose not to purchase it and I will choose to defend my home should you choose to use my TV to increase your inventory.

    16. Re:Yay communism by jc42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed; Communism is thoroughly dead in China. The current ruling gang apparently doesn't even give it lip service any more. Many writers with a bit of historical knowledge have commented that China is again ruled by mandarins, though they may not use that term.

      It is impressive how long rhetorical terms can last. Thus, Communism died in the old USSR when Stalin took power and became in all but name a new tsar. But Western propagandists still used that country as an example of Communism 50 years later, despite all the objections that the term no longer applied in any meaningful fashion.

      It's likely that 50 years from now, Western politicos will still be using China as an example of Communism, in their attempts to extend the old Communist/Capitalist false dichotomy.

      It's really just a way of blindly using code words to avoid at reality. A reasonable approach would be to simply treat terms like "Communist", "Capitalist", etc. as symptoms of writing without much thought or understanding. It's hardly worth debating when such terms appear, since (as a form of Godwin's observation) such terms usually mean that no reasonable discussion will be possible. In American politics, the terms "Liberal" and "Conservative" have come to have the same import.

      OTOH, if someone refers to events in China as "Chinese", reasonable discussion of events there might be possible. The current rulers of China aren't beholden to any outside ideology; they are their own people, with their own ideas and goals. Understanding will come from talking about them as they are, not by describing them with foreign words that don't apply very well.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    17. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Communism and totalitarianism are cut from the same cloth. You cannot have a true communist state without totalitarianism.

      Obviously non-communists states are also capable of being authoritarian/totalitarian. Though democracies/republics by definition are not totalitarian.

    18. Re:Yay communism by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's important that we limit, as much as is possible, our children's exposure to information, education, ...

      Of course. And, as here in the US, attempts to block children's exposure to the Internet will have a valuable effect: It tells the children where the forbidden knowledge is to be found. Those who want to learn will know where to look. And the next generation will be fluent users of the Internet.

      That's what we want, of course. So we should applaud all such attempts to block children's access to the Internet. This is the best path to a fully-interconnected world in which our rulers won't be able to keep us ignorant any more.

      (Written with tongue only half in cheek. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    19. Re:Yay communism by sapgau · · Score: 1

      Yes, absolutely.

      But wouldn't you agree that the Chinese government lacks some of the democratic customs practiced in most of the world and that they excessively opress their people for acts that we take for granted?

      Given thier long history of foreing ocupations and wars I understand that they want to ignore outside influence, but now by opening up economically it is hard to define what has happened to their communist ideals.

    20. Re:Yay communism by dave420 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Damn that's missing the point completely.

      First of all, they're not "cut from the same cloth". They're clearly seperate. I take it you've not read anything about communism.

      If you think a democracy can't be totalitarian, then you have to ask yourself this - what is a democracy? The act of voting doesn't make a democracy. Something that appears a democracy might be the furthest from it.

      I'm just saying, you clearly don't know what you're on about here. I'm sorry if I sound rude, but there's no way I can discuss this with you if you are assuming all these ridiculous things :)

    21. Re:Yay communism by Loundry · · Score: 1

      Communism, to survive, needs people acting together for the common good.

      Who decides what "the common good" is? How do we know what will truly be best for most people? Do we just put our trust in our elected leaders (who insist that yes, they truly know what's best for us)? What if they choose wrong? They are only human, after all.

      When one person in a communist group acts with their own interests first, communism stops working so well.

      How do you get everyone to NOT act in their own interest at all times? For example, what if my child gets sick and I need to take day off of work to take care of them. Should I be allowed to selfishly take care of my child or selflessly continue my work for the good of everyone (except my child, but we're talking about the *greater* good here)?

      Communism, when practiced properly, can be pretty cool. I'm more of a socialist, though ;)

      When has communism ever been practiced "properly"? I've read more than one communist apologist claim that there has never been a "true" instance of communism, not even one.

      I don't like socialism. At all. Can we still be friends? :)

      --
      I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
    22. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps of the 4 commonly known examples of Communism throughout modern history: China, USSR, the deformed Communist states (that had no revolution) in Eastern Europe, and North Korea there are not any that successfully went beyond that initial stage of necessary and justified totolitarianism. Your point would be improved by example: outside of nation-states Kerala, a state within India, has been, on average, officially Communist for a third of the last 50 years and that was due to elections-it happens to have the highest literacy rate in India also.

    23. Re:Yay communism by jc42 · · Score: 1

      But wouldn't you agree that the Chinese government lacks some of the democratic customs practiced in most of the world and that they excessively opress their people for acts that we take for granted?

      Sure; that's pretty well documented. But calling it "Communism" is merely a rhetorical device whose main function is to prevent coherent discussion. It has little to do with Communism or any other ideology. It's mainly the effect of a top-down power structure, which is dependent on keeping lower levels docile. This happens with any ideology.

      It is curious that China seems to be one of the few parts of the world with little history of democracy, which may be defined loosely as a system of choosing governors by some sort of voting process. This sort of bottom-up power structure has been developed independently in many cultures. Thus, contrary to current US government propaganda, even a casual reading of Mideast history will turn up many references to village-level democracy, typically in the form of town meetings of some sort.

      But China seems to have been mostly governed historically by a sort of civil service (bureaucracy), which you are hired into, and your career is determined by decisions of your superiors. This is another common scheme in many societies. It seems to have survived China's brief experiment with Communism quite well.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    24. Re:Yay communism by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      And it's your kid's choice if he chooses to buy it...

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    25. Re:Yay communism by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 1

      Provided the kid knows and understands the risks involved in using certain drugs yes, why not? Just like it's my decision if I want to buy it.

      Of course, although the kid deserves to have the right to mess themselves up, the parent also retains the right to get upset about it and try to stop them :-)

      --
      Silly rabbit
    26. Re:Yay communism by Richthofen80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take it you've not read anything about communism

      That's the idea. Everyone falls in love with communism when they read Marx. Everyone loves to TALK about communism. They write papers, they prostelyze about its virtues, and how wonderful it could be.

      But how is it, something so good on paper could always seem to be implemented wrong. Must be the wrong leaders, they say. 'My gang would implement communism better', they write.

      Maybe communism on PAPER leaves something out, that communism in PRACTICE always requires. Communism requires totalitarian rule in order to affix prices, force labor, and keep the popular will in check. Western pseudo-capitalist/democratic republics often don't need such rule, since participation in everything but rule of law is optional. In communism, those who choose not to work the assigned work defeat the larger economic machinery, which is highly directed. In the pseudo-capitalist/dr's, those who choose not to work only hurt themselves, they are not assigned any specific task and own the product of their labor.

      The disenfranchising factor among communist philosophy is that one cannot be free, in the traditional sense (libre), if one does not own the product of his labor outright, to sell, barter or save. The freedom of speech evaporates if one cannot save pennies to buy a soapbox to stand on. One cannot be free to live where he or she pleases.

      I guess a good encapsulation would be, can we expect the bill of rights to make any sense if Americans could not own the product of their labors?

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    27. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you that deluded? Free speech is itself useless in reality, and that alone of the US Bill might not logically result from informed communal decision. What are more important vastly are food, shelter, physical health, and capacity for improvement of those qualities based on capacity for work-this is the same in both communist and capitalist nations. Your understanding of Communism is flawed, but you only think on the failed communist governments so it is unavoidable. The true example is the Indian state of Kerala, it was and is the first modern genuine application of Communist ideology since the attempt in 1848 in the German states (pre-unification); Kerala was ripe for it politically and socially and the ideology needed only minor modifications to meet Kerala's needs. On every occasion that the CPI (Communist Party of India) won elections there it improved the state-the CPI must be elected to act and when acting has the benefit of the citizens of Kerala at core and achieves genuine improvements as evidenced by the history and stable prosperity of Kerala.

    28. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government in Beijing has lost the mandate of heaven.

    29. Re:Yay communism by jc42 · · Score: 1

      There is that. ;-)

      I do wonder how important that ever was. After all, a large part of their population was Buddhist, and what does heaven mean to them? You might try "mandate of nirvana", but that somehow doesn't seem to work too well ...

      There is also a question of whether they really did lose such a mandate. Remember when pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell informed us that the Sep 11 terrorists were doing the "work of God"? Maybe we should ask them about the state of the relationship between the Beijing rulers and the heavenly plane. They can probably give us first-hand information on the topic, since they apparently have a direct connection to God.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    30. Re:Yay communism by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... This seems to be anothe case of something I've been seeing lately: My message got attached to the parent of the one that I actually replied to. So it reads like a non sequitur.

      I guess I should have quoted the original message, short as it was. It may not get modded up, and won't be seen by many people who read my reply.

      I was replying to a comment that the current Beijing rulers don't have a mandate of heaven.

      Now let's see where this gets put ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    31. Re:Yay communism by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      Free speech is itself useless in reality

      Well, now we know why communist states are totalitarian. Because you just stated that food, shelter, and physical health are more important than the rights of man. I don't care if you could feed the starving babies of the world by enslaving men, (and time has proven that you can't,) it still is not right to do so.

      Even if I were to think of non-failed institutions, could I not build hypotheticals? Does Kerala have a declaration of rights of its citizens? Can citizens own property and the results of their labor? Full tummies and proper healthcare do not make a man free. If this were the case our prisons are guarunteed freedom.

      When a flood strikes Kerala, does the government have the right to confiscate the crops of the farmers? Does the government allow open criticism of the policies of the government?

      The ten amendments of the United States constitution reflect a desire of a fledging nation which asked simply that the right to live one's life, as he or she sees fit, (regardless of his or her 'community'), be codified. That a man's freedom is his right by birth, and his survival his own responsibility. If a man's survival is the responsibility of others, he has de facto enslaved them by his existence. Either a man is free and his life is his own responsibility, or everyone's life is everyone else's responsibility, and no one is free.

      Maybe you don't see freedom as a necessary component of the life of a man. Which is fine, you are 'free' to believe that or anything else. I'm also glad I am free to ignore you, and you cannot impose your will upon me via the use of force.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    32. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Necessary to divide response. Freedom is essential, simply the definitions of significant elements in which to be free differ between you, as expressed in your posts, and I. Kerala is a state of India, as such its citizens are protected by the Indian constitution; a quote from its preamble addresses your central concerns: "WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens: JUSTICE, social, economic and political; LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; EQUALITY of status and of opportunity; and to promote among them all FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation". To continue the discussion freedom is only as useful as individuals can make use of it. Poverty level, as it is called by US journalists, is opulence in comparison to many truly desolate areas of India but Kerala has had great success since its first government under the CPI in 1957-currently the highest quality of education and health care.

    33. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the last election of 2004 leadership was given to the United Democratic Front with the Indian National Congress, the CPI last had leadership from the 1996-2001 election under the third term of Nayanar whose terms had been uninterrupted by three terms of Karunakaran and one of Antony (1N, 2K, 1N, 1K, 1A, 1N) who were of the UDF/INC. Kerala has used CPI and its policies as other parties are used. It does have a more Socialist welfare economy thanks to the cooperation of the UDF and CPI for the citizen's benefits than America for your comparison, though the UDF is in power presently. Even if the CPI were in power in Kerala the emergency relief due by damage from the Tsunami, for useful example, would be from local capacities, national government and from international aid as it has been under the UDF leadership. This applies across all natural disasters. The CPI and UDF/INC, subject to elections and approval, have had leadership. The national government holds great power over Kerala but it can have a genuine second stage Communist government by election due to it.

    34. Re:Yay communism by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Communism is thoroughly dead in China. The current ruling gang apparently doesn't even give it lip service any more.

      Right on the front page of the main official Chinese Newspaper website, People's Daily, you can find links clearly defining a socialist doctorine.

      Down in the lower left corner you can find a link to Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping.

      In the same area on the page you'll find a link to documents about the Communist Party and State Organs.

      Perhaps the CP of China isn't the strictly Stalinist regime it once was. It hasn't ceased being a Communist Party, nor has it relinquished power.

    35. Re:Yay communism by sapgau · · Score: 1

      Well, I think the problem is to find a proper (diplomatic?) definition of what the chinese government is...

      It is very easy from a "western" point of view to think adjectives like authorative, dictatorial, brutal, abusive...

      Probably comparing China to it's neighbors would help define an aproximate description: it's not like N. Korea but it is certainly not another Japan.

      At what point do we accept China's actions and where do we (probably just the US) put a strong stop to them.

      Anyway, sounds like a nice thesis for a political science graduate.

    36. Re:Yay communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they wont be saying that, because in 50 years then, capitalism would have lost the battle against communism, be sure they'll be calling something else, and consider it some kind oc capitalist-evovled system (which it is, btw)

    37. Re:Yay communism by dave420 · · Score: 1
      You're assuming people won't always pull together. If selfish people live under a communist system, they ruin it for everyone else. The idea of communism is for the people to look after themselves, a sort of societal altruism.

      I can see you think "communism" is a dirty word, so continuing this is a waste of time. I feel sorry for you.

  5. Finally by planet-sloop · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Finally someone doesn't want their public subject to so much inane american propaganda.

    1. Re:Finally by jokumuu · · Score: 1
      Well, yes US has currently the best propaganda machine in the world, but there are many countries where that is not wanted, China is hardly the only one.

      Ofcourse some coutries have good enough propganda machines on their own so that by calling on patriotism they can counter that propaganda, but not every government feels secure in that they will succeed in such.

    2. Re:Finally by planet-sloop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its just a shame that no other countries news channel have such far reaching audiences as the yanks. the only one to come close is the bbc, but they are fairly neutral, and don't contest what the murdoch/turner stations broadcast.

    3. Re:Finally by luvirini · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In most countries of the world the local news channels have much more power than any international channel. if for no other reason, then for language issues.

    4. Re:Finally by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

      I'd have to disagree due to the americans world covereage. the only fault is there biased spin put on everything political. i know everyone has the option to change channels or switch off, but when there is only one option for gaining news, one watches it.

    5. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people of Europe seem to do a fine job of ignoring the American media without a need for government censorship. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that the Chinese people are just as capable.

      By assuming that foreigners are influenced greatly by the American media, you are attributing influence and power to the media which it doesn't actually have worldwide, thereby demonstrating your own ignorance. But hey, you keep "fighting the man" if it makes you feel good about yourself.

    6. Re:Finally by manifoldronin · · Score: 1
      Finally someone doesn't want their public subject to so much inane american propaganda.

      If this were some other thread on American politics, I might have just let it go - but here I'd very much like to call BS and to say that you have completely missed the point. The point here is the Chinese government is trying to decide what its people can or cannot see - not only "inane American propaganda", but also everything else.

      As for the "american propaganda", no hard feelings, but you probably have never lived in China or any communist countries long enough to know what a real propaganda machine is like -- it's pretty much one of the only two things (the other being armed forces) the ruling class relies on to hold those countries together.

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
  6. No Spam by network23 · · Score: 1, Interesting


    Hooray. Less spam.

    Reading my mailserver logs, it seems the only thing the Chinese use the Internet for is spam, spam, spam.

    1. Re:No Spam by skids · · Score: 2, Funny


      That's what happens when you put up a national firewall that lets port 25 thorugh.

    2. Re:No Spam by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really doubt that a lot of that spam is being relayed through internet cafes. China only cares about stopping people from looking at new ideas, they hate stopping anything that makes money.

    3. Re:No Spam by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1, Funny

      10-4 on that.

      However, sometime's it's really quite fun to analyze. The grammar/spelling is so completely apalling sometimes that you could filter on that criterion alone. Hmm... has anyone ever heard of a grammar-based filter that requires you to formulate full english sentences in order to get your mail across ?

      That'd be pretty cool. Not only would people become more careful with their spelling/grammar, but we'd also get rid of all those messages that did things like... "PeN iS enlar-gement".

      Of course this would sorta put some imposisitions on people who email you... But in a corporate evironment maby ?

    4. Re:No Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they sell World of Warcraft gold, too.

    5. Re:No Spam by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Never imagined that Chinese speak English, with Minnesota accent.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    6. Re:No Spam by verus+vorago · · Score: 1

      your corporate environment must be different to mine:

      * average English grammar/spelling around about 6th grade
      * better than 25% people w/ English as second language

      The funny thing is that it's those from English speaking countries who seem to have the worst grammar/spelling (particularly northern England :-)

      BTW your post would have been blocked: Spelling unknown - posible spam "maby" :-)

    7. Re:No Spam by Xiaran · · Score: 0

      Hmm... has anyone ever heard of a grammar-based filter that requires you to formulate full english sentences in order to get your mail across ?

      Jeez I hope not... nun of me emails wood evar get thru if such a sistem was implemented.

    8. Re:No Spam by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      Of course this would sorta put some imposisitions on people who email you... But in a corporate evironment maby ? Thank god /. isn't using such a filter yet :P

    9. Re:No Spam by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I find it somewhat ironic considering your last line ;)

  7. Let's reward them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    By expanding "free trade agreements" and raising the H1-B quota !!!

    1. Re:Let's reward them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bill Clinton, is that you?

    2. Re:Let's reward them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That joke got old real fast. Everybody knows Bill is too busy doing his nurse to be posting on /.

    3. Re:Let's reward them ... by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

      Nah mate he's here all the time...He's trying to overclock his pace-maker.

    4. Re:Let's reward them ... by bcattwoo · · Score: 1
      Nah mate he's here all the time...He's trying to overclock his pace-maker.

      I think you got Clinton confused with Cheney. Anyway, he's going to be mad that his post suggesting that China's move was a step in the right direction got modded -1,Troll.

    5. Re:Let's reward them ... by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Reward by raising the H1B quota? That's a drop in the bucket. We reward China every second during the business day by buying all the stuff marked "Made in China". Long ago, we setup ourselves to constantly reward China by making sure many things we buy are marked "Made in China".

      If you really, really want to stop rewarding China, stop buying Chinese goods, tell others to do the same, and start demanding (from retailers and representatives) that Chinese goods disappear from American store shelves. This is a hard road to travel, but our own mindless greed brought us here in the first place.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    6. Re:Let's reward them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, seems someone does not the true application of free trade.... Additionally don't forget that a key reason the USD has not plummeted more than it has is due to Chinese investing in it.

    7. Re:Let's reward them ... by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Chinese investment in America is a percarious perch, upon which we should not be. America is wealthy enough to invest in itself and to not be "propped up" by investment by foreign powers that are allegedly at great odds with American culture. Right?

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  8. This just in... by gowen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Chinese government restrictive, controlling bastards. But given the Great Leap Forwards, assorted purges on intellectuals, the show trials, the widespread censorship, the repression of Tibet and the Tiananmen Square Massacre, did we not know this already?

    So, why is this news?

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:This just in... by dustmite · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're right, human rights abuses are only interesting when it's new/exciting information .. because it's not about the information, it's all about the topical buzz, the fashionable memes, yeah man. I mean who wants to discuss China's ongoing human rights abuses, that's like sooo yesterday already! What's "cool" today?

  9. Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we don't like our government, we can vote them out. If Chinese don't like their goverment, they go to jail.

    There is a big difference.

    1. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we don't like our government, we can vote them out.

      "We" means nothing. The only collective entities that make coherent decisions are private corporations, not voter blocs.

      You as an individual have exactly as much power to affect the US government as any random Chinese citizen does of affecting their own.

      If Chinese don't like their goverment, they go to jail.

      You mean like Jim Bell?

    2. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by dave420 · · Score: 0, Troll
      Not necessarily. If you remember in 2000, Bush didn't have the popular vote. That means most Americans didn't want him in power.

      And, even so, you have to wait years for your chance to vote to happen again. And when it does, Diebold and ES&S vote for you anyway, so it doesn't matter.

      Please, please, please don't think the US is a beacon of democracy. It's the least democratic "western" state.

    3. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by KiroDude · · Score: 1

      I know some people will not agree or even less like this, but as a matter of fact, the main difference between countries as China and other more "civilized", is that in China people know they cannot vote the people in power out, whereas in those so called civilized countries, people believe they can do it, while they cannot. This would be a situation into which the red/blue pill choice fits perfectly... would you rather know what is going on, or would you rather pretend to be happy with what you think is the truth?

    4. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know some people will not agree or even less like this, but as a matter of fact, the main difference between countries as China and other more "civilized", is that in China people know they cannot vote the people in power out, whereas in those so called civilized countries, people believe they can do it, while they cannot.

      It doesn't matter whether people like or agree with what you've said. Despite what slashdot groupthink may have led you to believe, truth is not determined by agreement of the majority. (Neither is insightfulness or humor, btw)

      In my own humble opinion though, you're 100% right on the money.

    5. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by wheelbarrow · · Score: 1

      It is interesting to me that every time there is an article on Slashdot that is critical of China, there are always folks who fall all over themselves to excuse the Chinese government for brutality by illuminating problems with the US government.

      Didn't your mother teach you that two wrongs don't make a right? It is perfectly OK to be against both the transgressions of the USA government and the Chinese government.

      I just happen to think that living in China is far worse than the USA in terms of personal freedom. In the USA, we don't crush our children with tanks when they have a party in a public (Tiannenmen) square.

    6. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please look up something called the "Electoral College" and why it was implemented in the first place. And the other past president who has won the electoral college without the popular vote.

      And when it does, Diebold and ES&S vote for you anyway, so it doesn't matter.

      Prove It.

    7. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by dave420 · · Score: 1
      I'm just saying that all these Americans so hasty to bash China should look in the mirror first. As the bible says, "Let he without sin cast the first stone", and "Judge not lest ye be judged". Not that I'm a Christian or anything :)

      Of COURSE China has done some shitty things in the past. No-one is going to disagree with that. I'm just showing that the US isn't all that great, either. Call it levelling the playing field, if you will :)

    8. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by yannack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If we don't like our government, we can vote them out. If Chinese don't like their goverment, they go to jail. There is a big difference.

      Actually, it's more like:
      If we don't like our government, they make us think we can vote them out, and fix the election.
      Is it still such a big difference?

      If you think yes, factor in the you-don't-believe-in-our-values-so-we'll-hold-you- without-charges-lawyer-or-rights improvements to the penal code, a.k.a Patriot Act.

    9. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "In the USA, we don't crush our children with tanks when they have a party in a public (Tiannenmen) square."

      No, you shoot them instead.

      Again, China has more economic freedom, but less freedom to criticise the state. But Americans don't exactly have a lot of that left either post-9/11.

      Certainly I'd far rather fly to and from China than I would fly to and from America these days with the minimum-wage Nazis on the prowl for 'terrists'. Neither state is anywhere near perfect, but China is heading towards more freedom, whereas America is heading towards less and less.

    10. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by dave420 · · Score: 1
      I know about the electoral college. It's not rocket science! Bringing an un-democratic practice to everyone's attention when you're supposed to be defending America is pretty stupid, in my opinion.

      Remember? Democracy? One person, one vote? That's not how it us under the electoral college.

    11. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by jokumuu · · Score: 1

      I think that this has a lot to do with the fact that quite many people do not like double morale. When someone is preaching about some good behavior and then shows the opposite, the reaction is stroneger than if one just does the bad things without preaching the opposite.

    12. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think the republicans rigged the democrat primaries so that Kerry won it?

    13. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when it does, Diebold and ES&S vote for you anyway, so it doesn't matter.

      Prove It.


      Analysis of Diebold voting machines

      "[Diebold's] committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."

      - Walden O'Dell, chief executive of Diebold Inc., August 14 2004

      DailyKos

      Of course, the burden of proof is really on Diebold to prove their machines are secure against intentional tampering.

      "Why am I always being asked to prove these systems aren't secure? The burden of proof ought to be on the vendor. You ask about the hardware. 'Secret.' The software? 'Secret.' What's the cryptography? 'Can't tell you because that'll compromise the secrecy of the machines.'... Federal testing procedures? 'Secret'! Results of the tests? 'Secret'! Basically we are required to have blind faith."

      - Dr. David Dill, Stanford

    14. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

    15. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by XMyth · · Score: 1

      The whole cast the first stone and judge not stuff doesn't apply to establishments. Only people. Just FYI.

    16. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by LibraNut · · Score: 1

      I just happen to think that living in China is far worse than the USA in terms of personal freedom. In the USA, we don't crush our children with tanks when they have a party in a public (Tiannenmen) square. In the USA, we shoot our students when they get out of control (Kent State University and Jackson State University, May 1970).

    17. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you shoot them instead.

      Yeah, really. Older US history notwithstanding (Trail of Tears, Wounded Knee, etc), it's quite sad how fast Americans have forgotten what their government has done even in modern times.

      The first and most obvious example is Waco, Texas in the early 90s. How is that better than Tianenmen again? (Tanks were deployed)

      Also in the 90s, an FBI sniper (Lon Horiuchi) blew off the head of Randy Weaver's wife Vicki while she was standing in the cabin doorway holding their 10-month-old baby in her arms. At least with the tanks, you knew what was coming.

      Or what about Kent State in 1970? Doesn't anyone remember what happened then?

      Should I even bother bringing up the 50s and 60s, and the US government attempts at all levels to subjugate women and racial minorities? Doesn't anyone recall police using fire hoses on peaceful civil rights protestors? Or police behavior during the Watts riots?

    18. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by dave420 · · Score: 1

      No, it's about judging ANYTHING. If your car is shitty and you tell someone that their car is shitty, you can see how it applies. Same with your favourite cup of coffee, your favourite soap star or country. It's about the act of judging, not that which is judged :)

    19. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is interesting to me that every time there is an article on Slashdot that is critical of China, there are always folks who fall all over themselves to excuse the Chinese government for brutality by illuminating problems with the US government.


      The problem is that extreme China-bashing articles are posted here with regularity, while the most America-bashing that ever will appear here is criticism of copyright and patent laws, criticism of prosecution versus IP pirates and so on, meanwhile the US government is committing tangible crimes on the level of the Chinese every year. If you are going to gloss over that stuff, do it for China as well as the US or expect this sort of response. Or alternately, start covering American atrocities in detail as well.

    20. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1
      Vote them out? Yes, I had a really impressive list of choices in the last Presidential election:
      1. Pro-corporation, Anti-Labor, Pro-War Elitist #1
      2. Pro-corporation, Anti-Labor, Pro-War Elitist #2
      3. Various 3rd parties who had ZERO chance of winning even 1 electoral vote.
      The list of choices reminds me of the "choices" that come up in EVERY American election, for EVERY office. Essentially every electoral region is under the firm control of the left-wing and right-wing forms of the American Corporate War Party.

      It appears that like magic, Americans who want to vote out their elitist, warlike government tend to have only 1 other choice: a slightly different aspect of the SAME GOVERNMENT.

      It is true that dissent in China will get you jailed, whereas in America it is actually hard to get jailed for dissent. But the reason for this aren't warm-and-fuzzy feelings of liberty ... it's because in America, if voting could really change anything, we wouldn't have the vote in the first place.

      China is simply making her authoritarianism obvious. America has had a long practice in hiding it, and smothering it under layers of ritual that serve only to lull people like you into (I assume) supporting it. While you chant slogans and mouth doctrine, your American government is busily planning on sending your son to die on some plateau in the Middle East ... is also planning on sending your job to some Third World country ... and is also planning on applying more protections for large pockets of wealth.

      Once Americans can actually select a government other than the ones pre-selected for them by the wealthy, then I'll agree with your sentiment.
      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    21. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by ChibiLZ · · Score: 1

      Since when is the US a democracy? The US is a representative republic. I know there's some argument over the terms, but the US has never been a direct democracy as far as I know, but a representative democracy, or a republic-style government.

      Yes, I'm being semantic, and I'm probably incorrect. Regardless, I think of democracy as 1 person 1 vote, not an electoral college.

      --
      Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
    22. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by afa · · Score: 1

      In actual fact, they (in PRChina) can go aboard (to U.S. for example).

    23. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      The phenomenon you refer to is intentional. It is the result of the voting system and was chosen as a balance of choice against consensus.

      That's the real problem here. You can increase choice, but only at the expense of consensus. In our case, the first-past-the-post system pushes both parties as close as they can get to the median voter, but the result is increased consensus.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    24. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by XMyth · · Score: 1

      No, I don't see the correlation.

      The reason to not judge others or cast the first stone is because you yourself are no better than the ones you're judging. You have to be comparable to what you are judging for the rule to apply IOW.

      We are not our own government (no individual embodies their government) so it doesn't apply to comments like "China's government sucks".

      But, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

    25. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Choice vs. Consensus? If that's truly the design of the system -- and your analysis seems cogent -- then it's dueced odd that today, the divide between voting blocs is so deep. Choice is not being supported. Consensus is not being supported. Fraud and deceit seem to be favored items of support.

      Of course, this matches my expectation that minorities within both major parties are actually in control of their vectors. Torn between Neo-Conservatives and Neo-Liberals, many citizens (including many of those who allege to be part of the voluntary voting blocs) are being assaulted with a decline in socio-ecnomic liberty.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    26. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I can't think of anything the US government has done since the Civil War that has been anywhere as disasterous as, say, Mao's Five Year Plan and the Cultural Revolution.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    27. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The key difference here, even with various FBI blunders (and this tacit defense of Koresh and other anti-government loony-tunes is quite interesting) is that there is oversight. An American can write angry letters to his Congressman any time he wants. He can write nasty letters to newspapers. There are a whole host of political activities which an American can partake of if he wishes to denounce US government policy.

      Try doing that in China.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    28. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Rightly or wrongly the Founding Fathers were deeply concerned about the tyranny of the majority, and that was the reason behind the Electoral College. Everything they did in creating the basic strcture of the Republic's government was designed to balance and check powers, and that included the electorate itself.

      Now it may seem idiotic today, and maybe it should be changed, but the Founding Fathers were a pretty bright bunch, and I think one should at least consider why they did what they did. Considering the number of presidential elections since the Constitution was ratified, I'd say the electoral college system isn't necessarily as out-to-lunch as some claim.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    29. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And who the hell would want a direct democracy? That's what Athens was, and they democratically voted to force their most famous dissenter to commit suicide.

      There's a reason why virtually all democratic nations have chosen some form of representative democracy.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    30. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It is true that dissent in China will get you jailed, whereas in America it is actually hard to get jailed for dissent.

      If you're white, and have an "American" name.

      Google for "Jose Padilla" and "Yaser Hamdi". Both native-born American citizens. Both jailed for years without charges. Padilla was a bit of a two-bit thug (from Brooklyn ;-). Hamdi seems to be your basic nerdy nice guy (with an interest in Eastern religions). But this was all irrelevant when they were arrested. It's well understood in the US by the minority that ever heard of them that their real crime was being "in the wrong place at the wrong time" and not being white. The authorities didn't have enough evidence for a court case, so they just held these guys in jail without charges.

      When George Bush told us "If you're not with us, you're with the terrorists", most Americans weren't really all that worried. We understood the unstated "unless you're white" that would make it difficult for most of us to be jailed for disloyalty. But we're under no illusion that this applies to all Americans.

      (I do wonder sometimes what might happen if the authorities discover my French-Canadian grandmother. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    31. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      the divide between voting blocs is so deep.

      It may be deep, but it's not wide. In fact, it's very narrow. We're talking about a few swing issues that decide an election, or even no issues at all, but just a "gut feeling" about the candiadates' characters. This is evidence that as to the vast majority of political positions, including the truly most fundamental, there is very broad consensus. Obviously, the minority not part of the consensus may not see it that way, but such is the condition of being a small minority.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    32. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (and this tacit defense of Koresh and other anti-government loony-tunes is quite interesting)

      I knew someone would attempt to mudsling this way, because the world is full of people who are concrete-bound in their thinking.

      An American can write angry letters to his Congressman any time he wants.

      Step out of your fantasy world for a moment and consider reality. China is not an absolute dictatorship where its citizens have no freedoms whatsoever. A chinese could write a letter to a politician demanding reforms, and this happens quite regularly, any time he wanted to without repercussion.

      He can write nasty letters to newspapers.

      But not TOO nasty...

      There are a whole host of political activities which an American can partake of if he wishes to denounce US government policy.

      Within "Protest Zones" and "Free Speech Zones", of course.

    33. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush didn't have the popular vote, correct. But that doesn't really show what most Americans want, because of low voter-turnout. Plus most people realize that the popular vote isn't important, so why bother to vote when your state has been a bright blue (or red) spot on the map since the campaign began?

    34. Re:Yes, it does make them worse. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      First of all, I'm not going to hunt through a website looking for your claims. If you have the specific URL I'll happily look, but I'm not going to peruse an entire bloody domain.

      Second of all, China's answer to political demonstrations has been historically very nasty indeed, and as to protestors on our side of the Atlantic, when protestors stop tacitly forgiving anarchists with molotovs and guys who think bashing in the windows of Starbucks restaurants, I'll be a bit more sympathetic.

      There were pretty big anti-war demonstrations after the invasion of Iraq, and I didn't see tanks rolling over people. Comparing the US to China as far as freedom of expression is nothing more than vapid hyperbole.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  10. Uh huh... by UnRDJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other news, the Chinese goverment are a bunch of commie bastards, SCO are liars, and Microsoft has a monopoly on the desktop market. Seriously though, this kind of reporting is good. People tend to forget about this kind of stuff unless they're frequently reminded.

    1. Re:Uh huh... by jxyama · · Score: 1

      i need a fairly frequent reminder that beef is for dinner... :P

    2. Re:Uh huh... by lavaface · · Score: 1
      SCO are liars, and Microsoft has a monopoly on the desktop market.

      Thanks, I almost forgot. : )

  11. Re:And how many thousands... by planet-sloop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It does because china isn't immune to war crimes...nor do they threaten 3rd world countries to remove aid if they don't vote to keep americans immunity

  12. ARRRRGGGHHH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more Nescafe? whatever will I drink?!?!?

  13. Re:And how many thousands... by Nastard · · Score: 1

    Prostitution and gambling are legal in Nevada. I can't help you with the other stuff, but maybe you want to consider moving.

  14. Re:And how many thousands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there are places in China where net.cafes are still legal, so I guess the Chinese can move, too.

  15. And we're surprised why? by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China, for all the hype about markets opening up their society, is still a totalitarian communist country. I'm not surprised that they've cracked down on the cafes; I'm surprised they exist at all.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:And we're surprised why? by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      China, for all the hype about markets opening up their society, is still a totalitarian communist country.

      No, they're a totalitarian capitalist country now. Arguably fascistic, but certainly not democratic.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:And we're surprised why? by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [insert cheesy Star Wars quote]
      "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."
      [/quote]

      China, like most other countries (actually with or without democracy) rely on most of the people being content. Internet is too valuable a tool, and people would be upset if they couldn't access it at all. So you try to please the majority, yet at the same time crack down on those that could challenge your authority. Totalitarian regimes impose as much apathy as loyalty. Don't piss them off, keep them fed and enterained (Romans: Bread and circus), don't let religion challenge goverment (Soviet Union, Falun Gong in China) and you'll stay in power. It's all in the HOW-TO ;)

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:And we're surprised why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is my country and i live in the west. The sad thing about is it I had to live in another totalitarian society first before I realised my home country is worse. Maybe the thing i find hardest to swollow when i came back is the ignorance. And the belief that 'those other countries have it worse'.

      People had already given up there freedom. They didn't stand and fight when they are told how to live there lives. When the government stripped people of their land, locked them up indefinetly without trial. When the torture cases kept been swept under the table. When government makes itself above the law and courts. The controls and systems keep growing. People accept what they are told. And I sit and watch people living their lives, following these rules, reporting all those that fall short no matter how stupid the rules are. I dont know why i didnt truely see it before.

      I want my freedom back. I want people to wake up. I need to bring freedom to my own country before I start demanding freedom of other countries.

    4. Re:And we're surprised why? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      No, they're a totalitarian capitalist country now.

      According to Bill, it's a new form of capitalism.

      China has created brand-new form of capitalism: Bill Gates

    5. Re:And we're surprised why? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      According to Bill, it's a new form of capitalism.

      (From article): "He characterised the Chinese model in terms of 'willingness to work hard and not having quite the same medical overhead or legal overhead'".

      Translation: We can have them work all the hours God sends and still pay them peanuts; even if we don't employ them, we can still use the implied threat ("medical or legal overhead" applies particularly to the US) against workers in western countries.

      And they *aren't* "free" to go and find other jobs or get together in favour of better working conditions.

      As for 'new'; are China the first country to practise "market fascism"? Probably not. What makes it new is the sheer scale of the country and workforce.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:And we're surprised why? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      So they're a republican country then?

      I'm sure you meant Republican.

      I consider myself a republican, but not a Republican (if that has any meaning, as I'm not American anyway).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:And we're surprised why? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      I consider myself a republican, but not a Republican (if that has any meaning, as I'm not American anyway).

      Well, the Germans have (or had?) a Republican party too, so it's not just a purely American thingy.

    8. Re:And we're surprised why? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      China is merely encouraging widespread contempt for her law amongst her citizens. And we're doing much the same thing here in America with other foci: intellectual property, labor practices, drug usage, etc.

      China, like America, is blind to the wisdom of LEGALIZE AND TAX.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    9. Re:And we're surprised why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why has parent been moderid10ted as troll? He said sorry!

    10. Re:And we're surprised why? by Peldor · · Score: 2, Funny

      If the Chinese were really totalitarian capitalists, they would have closed the schools that were within 200 meters of the net cafes.

    11. Re:And we're surprised why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is partially democratic.

      it does have some free elections.

      mostly the local level. china is a work in progress of moving to a different form of govt. and a country that size is not simply gonna announce one day they are democratic and make it happen. (look at what happened to russia)

    12. Re:And we're surprised why? by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      Don't piss them off, keep them fed and enterained ..., don't let religion challenge goverment ... and you'll stay in power. It's all in the HOW-TO ;)

      I know you meant that last bit to be somewhat facetious, but that sounds quite a bit like what is laid out in Machiavelli' "The Prince," Which is basically a HOW-TO for running your country in such a way that you stay in power.

      Point being: It actually -is- in the How-To.

    13. Re:And we're surprised why? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      look at what happened to russia

      Russia was fscked up because free-market policies were forced (very suddenly) onto them in exchange for whatever the hell they got from western governments.

      And now they have a democratically elected, but nevertheless authoratarian leader reminscent of their communist past and the regime (and hence country) is growing more distant from the west; expect trouble to come.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    14. Re:And we're surprised why? by nathanh · · Score: 1
      China, for all the hype about markets opening up their society, is still a totalitarian communist country.

      And the USA is a theocratic fascist republic. So what? Demeaning descriptions, even if they are true, don't add any value to the discussion.

    15. Re:And we're surprised why? by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      They may actually qualify as a sort of post-totalitarian authoritarian state, sort of like Cuba but with more capitalism.

  16. Hey, we get cheap stuff at WalMart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Globalism has it's benefits: cheap foreign labor gets our jobs and we get cheap junk at WalMart. It's a win-win situation.

    1. Re:Hey, we get cheap stuff at WalMart. by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

      You also get cheap bullets and guns to shoot each other with...Everyone wins

    2. Re:Hey, we get cheap stuff at WalMart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Globalism has it's benefits: cheap foreign labor gets our jobs and we get cheap junk at WalMart. It's a win-win situation.

      Until...

      1. We end up having trade problems with China, (or where ever) and there are no factories here to actually MAKE anything ourselves

      2. All of our production jobs close down, so we are all forced to work serf like jobs at mega-chains like wal-mart while the uber rich upper class lives it up.

      3. It leads to One World Government (TM)

      Globalism isn't the "great deal" that both political sides make it out to be here in the US. You should realize if the democrats and republicans agree on something here in the US, it usually benifits politicians and upper class people. Why do you think neither party will touch the issue of our swiss cheese borders? They like having their slave labor servants.

  17. Re:And how many thousands... by luvirini · · Score: 2, Insightful

    During history big emprires have allways done what they think is best for themselves. The voice of the people and definitely other countries have no bearing on those, thus I do not see anything special from historical perspective with the american empire.

  18. Re:To all America bashers, and China-philes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure?

    I read Heinlein's "The Sixth Column" ... good guys win in the end.

  19. Re:To all America bashers, and China-philes by planet-sloop · · Score: 2, Funny

    You'll be eating your words and drinking George Dubbas H2Oil in 15-20 years when china becomes a super power to rival that of former russia

  20. The Children by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Funny

    We will impose our elitist totolitarian regime on you because of the Children! Won't you think of the children? (Thud) How about now? (Whap) Now? Good!

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    1. Re:The Children by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      heh

      Obviously, the communist Chinese government does not believe that parents should have the sole responsibility of regulating their children's use of the Internet.

      Kinda like gaming here.

  21. Re:And how many thousands... by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

    its not an american empire. its an Oilarchy. I just hope the world wakes up and forces the american farce of a nation into recession

  22. Re:And how many thousands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is a net.cafe? It's a 'net cafe surely?

  23. Re:And how many thousands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America isn't an empire by any definition of the word.

  24. The Censorship Technology Is Good If Used Properly by Space_Soldier · · Score: 4, Funny

    We all hate what the Chinese government are doing to their population, but all you admins out there, think about it. Their censorship technology is the best in the world, and it would improve production if it was implemented in USA companies. How would it improve production you ask? It will, for example, keep people from reading Slashdot all day.

  25. Re:And how many thousands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is a net.cafe?

    It's similar to a flaming pedantic asshole, but instead it's a cafe with computers inside that you use for a fee. In countries without ubiquitous net.access they are quite popular.

  26. Re:To all America bashers, and China-philes by halivar · · Score: 1

    You'll be eating your words and drinking George Dubbas H2Oil in 15-20 years when china becomes a super power to rival that of former russia

    By which time they'll be just another capatalist hegemony, much like yesterday's Britain and today's US. If you dislike capatalist hegemonies so much, why are you gloating over this?

  27. Re:And how many thousands... by badfish99 · · Score: 1

    Do you mean that being a Muslim or taking aspirin are illegal throughout the USA?

  28. Re:And how many thousands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is a cafe? Did you mean café?

  29. Re:america is fascist/communist too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gore and Kerry both conceded. Get over it, they did.

    Nothing to see here...

  30. Is not only about censorship by stm2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least the ban for inet cafe close to elementary school. In Argentina we have a similar situation, there are a lot of inet cafes because hardware is very expensive since peso devaluation and Internet conection is also expensive. Most inet cafes are used to chat using MSN and IRC and playing FPSMPG (like Counter Strike), so boys hang around for hours there instead of studying. It is very cheap, because there are a lot of inet cafes, it cost about 0.35$/hour, that is cheap even for us. Boys mostly plays and some MSN, and girls go just to chat via MSN.
    I am giving a basic computer course in an elementary school (9 to 12 years old) and they are asking me to teach them just to chat, even before learning how to type!

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    1. Re:Is not only about censorship by karnal · · Score: 1

      The thing is, though, that every one here had an experience like that.... either through the local Arcade (trips to the mall!!! YAY!) or on their new Nintendo Entertainment System...

      My parents regretted buying that thing for me for Christmas... But I think I turned out O.K. Just took the slipping of some grades to show me that I couldn't just veg out in front of it and ignore my other responsibilities... (Yes, my parents "attempted" to limit my time on it, so it wasn't their fault....)

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Is not only about censorship by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

      I've seen that here in North America, to an extent.. While visiting my girlfriend in Toronto, I'd take in the occaisional Net cafe' at about noon. Soon as I arrive, there's 50 kids either dodging school or on lunchbreak in the cafe.

      I guess here in North America, it's a community standards thing. In a "closed society, maybe it's a tad bit more serious. Regardless, the kids should be 'getting their lesson' versus surfing, chatting or playing. That makes closure or denial to those underaged during certain hours in itself isn't a bad idea.

      The problem (if you want to call it that, i'm sensitive to what side of the argument on, and not really interested in an argument on 'freedom vs. free-dumb') comes with the shuttering of these access spots. For a country trying this commu-capitalism thing, it's it's yet another "fit" for the infrequent "starts". But the Chinese seem to have learned well from the breakup of the Soviet Union and are determined not to meet that fate...

      --
      Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
    3. Re:Is not only about censorship by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      I agree to a certain extent, some of the closings are about politics. To say that is the only reason is like calling all Republicans conservatives and all Democrats liberals; it ignores that there is more than one reason for doing something.

      When I went to Shanghai, there were internet cafe's all over the place. Basically any place you could setup a table and a computer could be a internet cafe. Here are a few reasons I could think of closing some cafes.

      1. Some of the places were absolute dumps and not safe.

      2. They use pirated software, in fact all of them do so.

      3. high school and middle school kids would skip school to go to the cafe to play games instead.

      I am sure that there are other good reasons to close the cafes as well. Some of those reasons are not altruistic, but to think that they have no good reasons would be just be judgemental and shallow.

    4. Re:Is not only about censorship by stm2 · · Score: 1

      I slip all grades since I got my Commodore way back to the '85, but at least I learned computing enought to make a living, thanks to that.
      So I have mixed feeling about "let'em play at the computer" or "send them to their house to study".

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    5. Re:Is not only about censorship by karnal · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind, though, I'm talking about gaming.

      I grew up on a TI99/4A and a Coco3. Gave me wonderful experience trying to program each, with various languages.....

      The problem I fell into was that games around the SNES era were starting to hold my attention longer than the NES did, and I started to lose interest in making myself better at other things. That is when it starts to become a problem -- almost like a drug, even....

      --
      Karnal
    6. Re:Is not only about censorship by lachlan76 · · Score: 1
      Is not only about censorship (Score:4, Insightful)
      by stm2 (141831) <sbassi@asalup . o rg> on Monday February 14, @09:36AM (#11667203)
      (http://www.bioinformatica.info/)
      Ummm...just out of curiosity, you're posting about kids not working at 9:36 on Monday morning right? :P
  31. Not as bad as you may first think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was in Beijing last summer, and the one thing that struck me was how our American media promotes an image of an evil tyranny in China. (While it is true that most freedoms - as we know them here - don't exist, it isn't the spawn of evil its made out to be.)

    I had no problems accessing the Net from my hotel - albeit an intl. dialup connection - and even visited a few Net cafes. Most people I spoke to said the Internet was great but that we Americans don't realize that what we may want or consider a "great freedom" here in the US is not considered as important in the rest of the world. (Alright before you start going berserk and start spewing off about basic human rights, consider that we have made many, many mistakes in the past and it took us time as well to reach a state where we consider these freedoms as our rights; give 'em time!)

    Anyway, my point being, Internet was completely accessible except for a few sites that seemed to be proxied out at the Net cafes - Slashdot being one of them! ;)

    1. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by 0123456 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Indeed. It's not that China is an evil tyranny and America is a glorious bastion of freedom, it's that both are authoritarian states which choose to control and limit _different_ aspects of freedom.

      China, for example, has a lot more economic freedom than America (most obviously, I believe the top income tax rate is only 15%), but less freedom of speech (though, today, that difference is rapidly decreasing).

    2. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was in Beijing last summer, and the one thing that struck me was how our American media promotes an image of an evil tyranny in China.

      Yeah, at least if you consider Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch to be "American media".

      Some Christian pastors affiliated with my church are currently being tortured over there for talking about Christianity. Maybe that's not evil to you, or a necessary freedom, but most of us think it's a basic right.

    3. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but that we Americans don't realize that what we may want or consider a "great freedom" here in the US is not considered as important in the rest of the world

      Downplaying a freedom as "not important to the rest of the world" could be a great way to keep a populace pacified about not having it.

      Not saying that's necessarily the case, but it's a thought.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, at least if you consider Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch to be "American media".

      Both are fronts for US intelligence groups (one military).

    5. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by tgd · · Score: 0, Troll

      And you do realize those human rights organizations have a bit to say about us as well, right?

      Don't look down on China because of what happens there versus here unless you are going to understand that the government here wants us to be aware of what their government does and goes out of the way to try to keep us from knowing what ours does.

      We are the last country that should claim the moral high ground.

    6. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by manifoldronin · · Score: 1
      I was in Beijing last summer, and the one thing that struck me was how our American media promotes an image of an evil tyranny in China. (While it is true that most freedoms - as we know them here - don't exist, it isn't the spawn of evil its made out to be.)

      I can't see how you reconcile these with yourself - "it is true that most freedoms don't exist there" vs. "it isn't the spawn of evil it's made out to be". Did you know in China couples were arrested for watching porn at home by themselves? Did you know the government bulldozed people's houses without prior owner consentment and with just nominal compensation? Did you in China online forums would automatically drop your post if it contains any "sensitive phrases"?

      I had no problems accessing the Net from my hotel - albeit an intl. dialup connection - and even visited a few Net cafes.

      Did it ever occur to you that it might be because you were a foreigner and stayed in a hotel. And Beijing, being the national capital, may not be the best window for sampling ordinary chinese life?

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    7. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by Sammy76 · · Score: 1

      Despite how much I hate recent trends in this "post 9/11 America," -- I think that the difference in freedom of speech between the US and China is so immense that to compare the two by claiming the difference is rapidly decreasing is a vast overstatement.

      Furthermore, economic freedom is hardly measured by tax rates. I would argue that it is still much easier in the US for an average citizen to start and run his own business than it is in China. Chinese companies are strange beasts and are really dependent on a complex web of government / private connections.

    8. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      What are these people's names?
      No offense, but I just don't see why China would take the risk of torturing western nationals (I'm guessing american since you seem to live in the US).

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    9. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm in beijing right now, reading slashdot. how is it that slashdot is censored??? in fact, i read slashdot everyday (almost).

      ""

      why don't all of you grow up? lest you forget the weapons of mass deception...

      ""

    10. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by Bonhamme+Richard · · Score: 1
      The internet isn't a basic human right, but the freedom to communicate is. The net is restricted because it allows an individual to read foreign (capitalistic) ideas, communicate with the outside world (you mean they don't kill you for speaking against the government over there?) and organize anonymously.

      Capitalism isn't a great system, but we have never had to build a wall around our country to keep people IN. You don't disappear here if you speak against the government, etc.

      If" evil tyranny" involves killing all those who oppose you, restricting access to any media that disagrees with you (internet, tv, radio, newspaper...) and telling the masses that its all for their own good, then, I'm sorry, but China has a tyranny issue

    11. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by radish · · Score: 1

      Of course if the chinese torture people it's evil and oppressive, but if the US does it, it's promoting freedom in the world.

      AI and HRW have had a few things to say about the US administration too. Maybe the old adage about glass houses and stones is applicable here.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    12. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by toomanyhandles · · Score: 1


      Some Christian pastors affiliated with my church are currently being tortured over there for talking about Christianity. Maybe that's not evil to you, or a necessary freedom, but most of us think it's a basic right.


      Well here in the US it's now openly OK to torture people now up to the point of organ failure. Condoleza Rice's successor never DID _change_ his definition of torture, just justified it.

      Apparantly we're ripping out fingernails in the name of God and Country, just like the "bad guys" do.

      Brought to you in part by a fundie pastor near you who brags about controlling the Republican party http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040925/n ews_1n25christ.html

      The point being not to make fun of pastors (not totally anyway :) but to point out, it's pretty hard to take the moral high ground with the US imprisoning people without representation or evidence, defining tortures that are allowable, etc.

      Our "street credibility" on these issues is pretty low, in other words.

    13. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by asscore · · Score: 0, Troll

      If there is one thing I agree with china on is religeon is for the weak and should be destroyed at all costs. I'm glad your pastor is getting his ass whipped. maybee he shouldnt be willfully going into someone elses country to break the law. Same thing with those "missionaries" in afghanastan befor the war. They were imprisoned for breaking the law. You may think you're on a mission from god to "save" these people, but they dont want your salvation, and are more than happey to turn you in for disturbing thier way of life.

    14. Re:Not as bad as you may first think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Just don't get arrested in China, or you will learn what it means to NOT be judged by your peers. You will appreciate very quickly the freedoms many take for granted in the West.

  32. Shutting down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see no idea with this, well, china CLICK YES TO CONTINUE

  33. Another news of Chinese Gov Information control by orinalcoflow · · Score: 1

    It can be consider as a slogan that the Gov want to protect child,the underneath is the Gov dear the spread of Internet will open the free gateway for information leak externally and internally

  34. So? by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    Its their country, their rules.. internet access is not a 'human right'..

    Slow news day i guess.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:So? by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

      Its their country, their rules.. So why does america feel the need to interfere so much?

    2. Re:So? by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

      Would you be saying the same thing if it were happening in your country? Or if it were books they were banning instead of Internet access (though I'm sure they do that too...)?

    3. Re:So? by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      How is surfing the Internet affecting anyone else, or infringing on their rights? This is the standard by which we should judge governmental actions.

      The Chinese Government is unjustly limiting the freedoms of its populous by restricting actions that have no effect on the rights of others. To simply write it off means that you woudn't mind if the your government took away your Internet access to keep you from "bad things."

      I find it funny that most right-wingers are such big apologists for brutal dictatorships we call "allies" and yet complain about our own "big government."

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    4. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The concern is not about human rights, the concern is with censorship.

      An it's 'their' country??? In what way, exactly?

    5. Re:So? by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its their country, their rules..

      Let's take that idea to a logical conclusion:

      Sudan...it iss their country, their rules.

      Serbia...it is their country, their rules.

      We can go back in history and include Cambodia, Nazi Germany, ...

      I guess hatred of America is so strong these days that the Slashbots feel compelled to defend every other government, even some of the most despotic and totalitarian.

    6. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its their country, just like it would be a slave's plantation.

    7. Re:So? by forand · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking I would agree with you: virtually whatever it is if you do it in your home I don't care. The problem is that there becomes a point at which the things that are being done infringe on other's rights or knowledge is being so limited that people are not aware of their "human rights." The latter is the case in China. While there are a few Westernized areas that tourists are somewhat free to travel in, the majority of the population of China do not live in these regions and are not even allowed to move to them. China is attempting to limit these people's knowledge of the world around them so they can be exploited. If one does not know any different then slavery can appear to be reasonable.

    8. Re:So? by Vince+Mo'aluka · · Score: 1
      internet access is not a 'human right'

      Voluntary association is the human right in question. Mind you, China is hardly the only country, nor the first, to rob its people of the right to voluntary association. As a rule of thumb, the bigger the government, the more erosion of this fundamental human right. Yes, this means that the US government is among the worst offenders.

      Its their country, their rules

      And I suppose you'd still be singing that catchphrase as your own government drags you off to prison for breaking its own laws against voluntary association. (Have we got a case of the "if it ain't me, it doesn't concern me" syndrome?)

      --
      You took his stuff. You pound him.
    9. Re:So? by gowen · · Score: 1
      Let's take that idea to a logical conclusion:
      That's only a logical conclusion if you consider removal of net access to be equivalent to genocide and mass murder.

      The govt of the PRC are bad, bad people, but the evidence for this is not that they ban cybercafes. They're bad people because they violently surpress dissent from, and oppression to, their rule.

      Quick clue:
      Killing and torturing your political opponents : bad.
      Restricting cybercafes : relatively, not actually a very big deal.

      Got that? Good.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    10. Re:So? by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

      And moral relativists are horrible people.

      So?

      P.S. You're getting the words "right" and "entitlement" backwards.

      --
      I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    11. Re:So? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Its their country, their rules.. internet access is not a 'human right'..

      "Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19.

      Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

      Censoring expressions protected by the declaration, is a violation of their right to seek, receive and impart such information. Granted, Internet access is in itself not a human right. But that the access, where such exists, is free of political censoring is.

      Now, I would certainly call it a minor breach, but in the case of China it is one of many designed to keep the current regime in control. As such, I have no problem invoking one of the most fundamental human rights against this "trivial" restriction of their rights.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:So? by manifoldronin · · Score: 1
      Its their country, their rules.. internet access is not a 'human right'..

      Slow news day i guess.
      -- ------ What part of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" do you not understand ----

      "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" is not a "human right" either.

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    13. Re:So? by nurb432 · · Score: 0

      I hate to OT, but I agree its not a 'human' right. Its a god given right, that just happens to be guaranteed by the constitutional framework of the country that I live in.

      Where you live, it may be different and your founders dont agree with mine. More power to you, its a big world...

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    14. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least china doesnt (at the moment) intend to impose their rules on the rest of the world

      going along these lines, i can also deduce that US's current intentions run parallel to that of Nazi germany's

      fatal logic

    15. Re:So? by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      I agree - beginning ~60 years ago with Nazi germany America has gotten involved with too many things. We need to step away and let other people solve their problems by themselves.

    16. Re:So? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, but it is their country, and their rules, and they are a sovereign nation. We can talk all we want and pass judgement, that's fine, but it is not for us to interfere. We don't have the right, and how they run their country is none of our business.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  35. Nothing about " Freedom of speech out the window" by bunnytail · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This has nothing to do with "Freedom of speech", or should I say, the intention of it is to prevent kids from spending too much of their spare time on those cafes playing game. If anyone has been to such cafe in China would know there are almost NO adults in these cafe except young kids. And as a matter of fact, they are playing games instead of "Freedom of speech".
    If there would be "speech" during the course, its just someone looking for ONS, instead of the "POLITICAL FREEDOM OF SPEECH". Most adult will use their own computers at home instead of the dirty, ugly public "internet cafe".

    This action helps to keep the kids a little bit away the computers and do some real physical pratices.
    Secondly, this also helps to crack down the pirate softwares across those so called "internet cafe".

    Just to clarify, in term of internet connection, there is no difference from home or from "internet cafe". They all go to the same gateway which prevents anyone from accessing "unauthorised contents".

    BTW, 99% of the "Internet cafe" in China has no cafe!

  36. Re:To all America bashers, and China-philes by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

    I notice its a little smaller Atlas

  37. Re:And how many thousands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk to your own goverment if you want to quibble semantics about what "drugs" mean, because they haven't offered any clearer distinction between the ones they pick as illegal and aspirin than I have.

    Since the USSC thankfully denied Bush's request to be able to seize American citizens, in America, and hold them as "enemy combatants" without legal rights, I guess it isn't illegal to be a Muslim in the US... yet.

    BTW, what do you think of the United States' actions in Guantanamo?

  38. Re:And how many thousands... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    America doesn't really have an Empire, it has military bases scattered about the place but that's it.

    However it is the worlds most powerful country and it may well have been the case in the past that other countries in the same position may have just suited themselves that doesn't mean it's a good thing and indeed a lot of Empire began to fall apart when they did start to consider their effects on those around them, this is one reason why America is not still a part of the British Empire.

  39. Re:The Censorship Technology Is Good If Used Prope by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your workforce is not cattle. Don't treat them as such ( note: I'm not happy with how we treat cattle either ). I give my employees their taskes, they finish them to the best of their ability. I don't care how, as long as it's done by the deadline, everyone is happy. They can fuck around on slashdot for the entire week, as long as that report is on my desk by friday 5pm, they are gold.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  40. Re:And how many thousands... by arodland · · Score: 1

    Besides the fact that you didn't even try to turn "oil" into something acceptably greek, your claim still doesn't make sense.

    Patriarchy is "rule of the fathers".
    Oligarchy is "rule of the few".
    Anarchy is "no rule".
    Olearchy would be "rule of the unctuous combustible substances."

  41. Things in China are CRAZY. by Gannoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow, the people in power don't like something and want to see it censored or banned.

    So, to try and convince the public, they announce that the thing that THEY don't like is dangerous for children...

    THEN, once you've established that it is bad for children, you can get rid of it altogether in the name of protecting children!

    I'm glad that would never happen here!

  42. The RIAA isn't all bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Must even the most un-related news items be somehow tortured into a reason to self-proclaim one's rights to an artist's work, unpaid-for?"

    I know a lot of you hippies say this stuff, but the truth is that the RIAA pays a some musicians for their work, and that not all of them are forced into bankruptcy by bad contracts that are offered by the RIAA.

    So the RIAA doesn't claim that they don't need to pay musicians; its just that they (rightfully) set up the contract so that you have to sell a lot of records.

    Besides, if the musician doesn't like it, then don't sign the contract!

  43. Like in Indiana by suso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For example, no net café is allowed to open within 200 metres of a middle or elementary school.

    That's kinda like in Indiana how there is a law that says you can't sell alcohol within 150 feet of a church.

    I worked at a grocery store once that couldn't sell it because of that silly law.

    1. Re:Like in Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't complain. At least your state is progressive enough to allow alcohol sales in some grocery stores. I live in PA - where you have to go to three stores to make a Gin and Tonic ;-(

    2. Re:Like in Indiana by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Across America, it is commmon to have local laws that similarly restrict the placement of sexual businesses like porn shops, dancing clubs and massage parlors.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    3. Re:Like in Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er, what's the third store for? limes I imagine. Anyways, in NY you can't buy beer and alcohol at the same place, at least in PA you can.

    4. Re:Like in Indiana by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      HA!

      You've got nothing on me. Here in Srarkville, MS they can't sell beer and liquor in the same building. You can't buy anything alcoholic on Sundays, and it is illegal to sell cold beer. It must be warm.

      And since 50% of this town is Mississippi State Universite campus (second largest campus in the US) there are very few places where you can actually have beer. Luckily the campus has no rules aginst liquor though...

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    5. Re:Like in Indiana by WD_40 · · Score: 1

      As a native Californian, the restrictive laws in that portion of the country have always seemed odd to me. Here in Cali, the supermarkets carry all forms of beer, wine and liquor, as do convenience stores - 7 days a week.

      California has plenty of other fucked up laws to make up for it though.

      --

      "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925

    6. Re:Like in Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, hard liquor in PA has to be sold at special state-approved stores, which generally don't sell beer. You could buy beer and wine at the same place, but not the hard stuff.

    7. Re:Like in Indiana by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Here in Srarkville, MS they can't sell beer and liquor in the same building.
      Oh my god!!! Microsoft (MS) has it's own state now!!!!
    8. Re:Like in Indiana by legirons · · Score: 1

      "That's kinda like in Indiana how there is a law that says you can't sell alcohol within 150 feet of a church."

      So all you need is a church built into a mobile-home to go around forcing stores and bars to close?

  44. China remains an Evil Empire by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Call me "right wing", call me "a troll".

    But time and time again, China demonstrates, that it still remains evil, embracing parts and aspects of Western capitalist democracy only as a more efficient way of doing things, rather than out of genuine desire to promote freedom...

    How do they manage to escape the scrutiny of the same freedom-minded people, who can not talk about Bush without foam forming on their mouthes?

    The same people, who insult politicians by painting swastikas on their portraits, but proudly wear Che Guevara T-shirts (with red star on top)?..

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by lysium · · Score: 4, Informative
      I guess you never heard of the whole "Free Tibet" thing, or those protests over allowing China into the WTO over their human rights record?

      You seriously have no idea what you are talking about.

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    2. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Che Guevara was Chinese?

    3. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by thpr · · Score: 1
      It is a rather interesting study to trace the history of our 'friends' in the Asia Pacific region.

      Taiwan: For 5 decades from 1949, the ruling authorities gradually democratized. In 1995, the first direct presidential election was held.

      South Korea: In 1987, South Korean voters elected ROH Tae-woo to the presidency, ending 26 years of military dictatorships.

      This from our capitalistic 'friends' we've had from the Nineteen Fifties.

      The Chinese government has recently allowed local areas to elect their town and village leaders; and has been broadcasting that local regions can't depend on the national government to completely support them.

      The 'danger' the Chinese government faces is how to do capitalistic reforms (which require personal property rights, among other things) yet avoid people asking for more power. That is quite a fence to walk... especially as a population turns over to a new generation (also look at the cultural changes regarding work occurring in Japan). I'm not saying I like the Chinese government, but I also think they are simply taking every effort at slowing the inevitable. I believe they will succeed at slowing the change, but not stopping it.

      Referring back to the history above, it took South Korea 30 years from the end of the Korean War to go from a military dictatorship to Democracy. So what will China look like 30 years after its ascention to the WTO?

    4. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by spinkham · · Score: 1

      The thing about China that no one on Slashdot seems to realize is that Chinese government isn't as centralized as ours. You can say just about anything you want about China, and it will be true for some part of China. They have a government that resembles our government pre-civil war, when we didn't have such a strong federal government, and each state made and enforced a lot of their own policies about important issues.
      On the other hand, I agree with you, all governments are evil in some way, and the way theirs is evil offends me, just like the way the US is offends others.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    5. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by phuturephunk · · Score: 4, Informative

      China cannot embrace a completely 'open' western style of democracy as trumpeted by the United States, it's an impossibility with their current population numbers and the land predicament that they're in.

      China has around 70% the arable land that the United States does yet it has around 4 times the population (give or take). With numbers of people like that and the sheer logistics of feeding them all, a more heavy handed form of 'population control' is needed above and beyond lightly recommending how people do things. This is why you've seen policies such as the 1 child rule and a general aversion to completely opening up internet access to the public. Some would say that this keeps them in a state of ignorance, but honestly we as Americans have absolutely no idea what it would be like to have that many Americans running around.

      Imagine this country with say.. 2.4 billion people walking around. It'd be a nightmare and if you think that the government of the US, if faced with the task of controlling and moving society along with that many people around, wouldn't impelement hard core big brother control, you have another thing coming. Free is a great idea when you have sea to shining sea and amber waves of grain, things get a bit hairer when famines could potentially kill HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS people and cause unrest on a scale never seen before by man if the dinner plate isn't filled. Also keep in mind that people are generally stupid and impulsive when they get into large groups (regardless of beliefs). This fact about human behavior has the potential to produce some pretty disasterous results.

      People like to point out that India is the world's largest democracy. What they fail to mention is that India also has one of the longest lived and highly adhered to caste structures ingrained into the very fabric of their society. So yeah, they're democratic but at the same time everyone is 'assigned' a place that they cannot move from, so you're back to rigid control of thoughts and ideas in one form or another. The benefit that India has is that their generally effective use of education still bolsters innovation.

      China does what it has to do to get the job done. No more, no less. I don't like the fact that they're communist. I don't like that fact that they censor and propogandize everything, but looking at it objectively, I can understand the effectiveness of the method.

    6. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by Tonytheloony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do they manage to escape the scrutiny of the same freedom-minded people, who can not talk about Bush without foam forming on their mouthes?
      You argument is flawed and simplistic (yet you get +4 insightful...) : disliking Bush has *nothing* to do with admiring China's leaders. I dislike both.
      And childish/nonsensical terms such as "Evil" bring nothing to the table.
      After all I consider Bush evil, but I guess you would disagree.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    7. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by katharsis83 · · Score: 1

      "How do they manage to escape the scrutiny of the same freedom-minded people, who can not talk about Bush without foam forming on their mouthes?"

      Actually, the decision China has taken here, many from the new Right will probably agree with. The justification for the argument was to ban Internet Cafe's around schools because they allow children unfettered access to the internet.

      Remember the Communications Decency Act? Rememeber all the speeches by Jerry Falwell about the new electronic medium and it corrupting children? Give half the chance, conservatives in THIS country would ban internet access to pornography too.

      Going from the Bush administrations' attempts to delay FOIA stuff from being released to Ashcroft covering up Lady Justice's nipple, this decision seems far more in line with the Neocons than some college hippies.

      Btw, the reason GWB hasn't started massive sanctions on China for it's lack of freedom is for 2 reasons:
      #1 - No Oil
      #2 - Too much precious trade going back/forth between the two countries.
      Trade >> Freedom in the eyes of Republicans.

    8. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The same people, who insult politicians by painting swastikas on their portraits, but proudly wear Che Guevara T-shirts (with red star on top)?..

      The fact that you think there is any link between Nazis and Guevara shows that you're way out of your league here. Go study some history. I won't call you "right wing" or a "troll". Just ignorant.

    9. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by jc42 · · Score: 1

      [K]eep in mind that people are generally stupid and impulsive when they get into large groups (regardless of beliefs).

      Somewhere I once read a "law" that the intelligence level of a group of humans is inversely proportional to the square root of the group's size.

      But I can't remember who wrote that. (Google doesn't seem to know, either. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    10. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you never heard of the whole "Free Tibet" thing, or those protests over allowing China into the WTO over their human rights record?

      See America
      See Iraq
      See Americans in Iraq (wack wack wack)

    11. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by mi · · Score: 1
      The fact that you think there is any link between Nazis and Guevara shows that you're way out of your league here. Go study some history.

      My studies of history (and experiencing the more recent parts of it) lead to a strong conviction, that the Red Star/Hammser-and-Sickle are no less abhorrent a symbol, than the Nazi swastika.

      Both symbolize popularly appealing, yet corrupt ideologies, that -- as a side effect -- lead to mass-murder of millions.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    12. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by mi · · Score: 1
      I guess you never heard of the whole "Free Tibet" thing, or those protests over allowing China into the WTO over their human rights record?

      Oh, yes, I have heard of them...

      I'm also seeing Falun Gong members being routinely ignored by Manhattanites -- the same ones, who went into a frenzy over Republican convention.

      Most importantly, however, I read regularly about France -- that beacon of the Left -- lobbying hard for lifting EU's ban on arms sales to China. Can forget about Chirac's (man second only to Hugo Chavez in the amount of Left's admiration) constant talk about the need for "multipolar world". I'm not even sure, he is glad USSR is no more, if he seeks to replace it with China so soon.

      Are you?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    13. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by lysium · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm sure you know that Falun Gong is in NYC for a PR and fundraising campaign. If there is anything a real New Yorker knows it is when someone is attempting to sell them something. Most New Yorkers ignored the RNC and the protests, too. They mainly went about their daily tasks, even though -- gasp -- they are liberals!

      France is not the beacon of anyone. The left fails to hate France, simply refraining from jingoist sentiments spewed by neoconservatives. IF you wish to call that admiration, by all means do so, you are obviously a partisan ass to begin with.

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    14. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by mi · · Score: 1
      Most New Yorkers ignored the RNC and the protests, too.

      Revising history? The whole Manhattan was in a frenzy. Going across it in daytime, one was bound to hit at least one demonstration, normally -- two. If that's "ignoring", I don't know, what "reacting" is...

      France is not the beacon of anyone.

      Talking to a Left-leaning person, France will come up as one of the "successfull" alternative models of society. With three of four different communist parties, how can it not be a beacon :-) ?

      The left fails to hate France, simply refraining from jingoist sentiments spewed by neoconservatives.

      Jingoist? It is not jingoist -- it is quite normal to dislike people, that dislike you. 88% of the French (according to the latest poll) dislike our president. Are those of us, who like him (not you, I know), not justified in their feeling of resentment? How is that chauvinism/jingoism and not a normal reaction? Especially, considering the red carpet rolled out by the same French for a much more evil (here we agree, I hope) Chinese leader.

      you are obviously a partisan ass

      The usual... Out of steam, down to insults... Remember to logout, loser.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    15. Re:China remains an Evil Empire by lysium · · Score: 2, Interesting
      First off, I have no intention of respecting an opinion based on nonsense. I call you an ass because, frankly, your malformed opinions show a distinct lack of critical thought, despite your Slashdot account. Earn it with intelligent statements and not groupthink and I will gladly retract my accusation.

      Case in point. There are at least eight million people in New York City. Did most of them report to work? Did offices and stores close because everyone was going to be out protesting in the streets? No. You are making idiotic assumptions because thousands or tens of thousands of people expressed themselves democractically. That is still an insignificant fraction of the population, especially if you consider how many of those protestors were not from New York.

      88% of the French (according to the latest poll) dislike our president.

      Around half of the American population doesn't like him either. Perhaps this explains your "resentment" for "the Left"? You claim that your feelings are justified, after all.

      Talking to a Left-leaning person, France will come up as one of the "successfull" alternative models of society.

      Canada is quite similiar, i.e. a democracy with socialist leanings. But hey, Canada was not chosen as a target by the Right, so no complaint over their form of government or dislike of Bush. Just France, they who dared to stand in the way of American will.

      Oh, and you must not have been in New York when the Chinese Premiere was in the Waldorf-Astoria for a few days. Probably did not see the massive protests on Park Avenue that ran day and night (I worked nearby, I saw it firsthand). He lived in luxury, meeting US officials for exquisite lunches. Our government drooled over the chance to rake in billions over increased trade with China.....but oh those evil French, looking to make money in a similar fashion! EVIL!

      a much more evil (here we agree, I hope) Chinese leader.

      If you are still paying attention, which leader in all of China's history would you consider good? Bet you can't come up with one, because you dont know a damn thing about the nature of their society. Prove me wrong, if you will.

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  45. Chinese basement nerds of tommorow by MrLint · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its a good thing those cafes are 200m away. This is sure to be too far a walk for the chinese computer CHUDs the internet will surely spawn:)

  46. Re:And how many thousands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    its not an american empire. its an Oilarchy. I just hope the world wakes up and forces the american farce of a nation into recession


    Quite simply, it won't happen...

    unless of course you're willing to play "Scorched Earth" and cut your throat along with ours.
  47. China Prohibits Freedom! by NardofDoom · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I sure am glad we've granted them most favored nation trading status and are giving them all our money and selling them all our debt!

    Because we love freedom!

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:China Prohibits Freedom! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I know... if the last century had been freedom verses tyranny rather than capitalism verse communism I think the world would be full of free states.

      unfortunately all we ended up with because of the stupid policies of the cold war was a world full of capitalist tyrannies.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:China Prohibits Freedom! by elpapacito · · Score: 1

      In some other countries, freedom is only formal.

      For instance, take U.S.A. You want to speak about sex in a prurient way on radio and tv ? You can't unless you can pay $500000 (yeah 500K) each time FCC finds you're indecent according to "contemporary standards".

      Yeah, formally it's NOT censorship, but it is in practice because hundred of million of citizens can't afford to pay the fines.

      Today it's about sex, tomorrow who knows ? Badtalking big companies who gracefully donate work ?

  48. China by Council · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We think it's so easy to change a culture just by handing them the tools to do it. Sure, something will happen, and it might even be roughly what we expect, but I submit that the majority of people here sitting at their computers cheerful advocating the overturning of an entire governmental system and associated culture have . . . really no clue what they're dealing with.

    I truly believe that education is the silver bullet, that information and communication are what will lift the human race to heights undreamed of. I just think there's something a little deserving of pause about saying "culture of compliance, family, and subservience? Pssh, here, let's give them SSH and proxies and do our best to overturn all controls and make their internet develop like ours, and with a mouse-click, throw down a government we think isn't handling stuff right. It's not that we shouldn't change things we feel are wrong, it's that we should be aware we're dealing with a whole different culture than what most of us are used to, and that culture isn't necessarially just going to morph into the 'standard' one if handed the tools.

    I'm not an expert on China; I don't even have a strong opinion on what anyone should do about this kind of thing. I just think it's good to pause now and then and think about what we're doing.

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  49. The difference is not huge, the Artists transfer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those rights to the Record Companies voluntarily, in exchange for big bags of cash and hats made out of money.

    The fact that most artists waste those bags of cash trying to outdo each other buying $500,000 dimaond studded watches, and cruising around town in stretch HumVee limos, and then complain that the record companies are cheating them is irrelevant.

    The RIAA represents the those who hold the rights to the creative works.

  50. Yay capitalism by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China: The Biggest Red State

    If China ever was truly communist (which I doubt), it sure as hell ain't now.

    As someone said, when they embraced capitalism, China went from being one of the last major left-wing dictatorships to being one of the last major right-wing dictatorships.

    Which doesn't necessarily make them any more free.

    It's all bullcrap anyway; the supposedly left-wing North Korea is run in a pseudo-monarchistic manner by Kim Jong-Il, who took over from his father. This is about as un-left wing as you can get; not that it makes any difference. Whatever their *claimed* alleigance, dictatorships are dictatorships are dictatorships, run for the benefit of the ruling party; in that sense, they are *all* right-wing, but not in a remotely "freedom-loving" way.

    The more I think about this, the more the left/right wing labels seem like a joke; they only really have relevance when it comes to free societies.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  51. Re:To all America bashers, and China-philes by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

    Because all your internet cafes will be shut down.

  52. Thinking of the children by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm sure we're going to get the usual "Chinese and enforced censorship" spiel here, but taking a step back and looking at the bigger picture what they Chinese have done is quite reasonable for their claimed goals. The Chinese government publishes a list of regulations for operating a Cybercafé, admittedly a strict list, but it's there, it's the law and you break it at your peril.

    The main causes given for the closures is locating a Cybercafé right next to a school and allowing minors free access to pornography. What chance do you think a Cybercafé would have to continue trading in the EU, US etc. if it was found to be a magnet for truants and/or providing unfettered access to pornography to minors? They also restrict violent games to certain age groups, which is different to the age requirements we have on our computer game boxes, how exactly? Doom 3 is rated "18" in the UK for example, and companies can be prosecuted for breaking that restriction and selling the game to a minor. The same goes for logging all outbound access - you'd be insane not to log everything if you were running a Cybercafé in the event someone launched a cracking attempt from your premises.

    OK, I do have concerns that these logs are going to be "auditted" by the Chinese government for what they might see as subversive elements, disloyal behaviour or whatever. The censorship of free access to information, even if it *is* pornography, should not be blocked - immoral and illegal should not automatically be the same thing. Still, at least the Chinese appear to understand that restricting Internet content is an internal matter and are making an effort to deal with it themselves instead of trying to ram their legislation down the throats of other nations. Now if only they would let their people have a larger say in what was and was not permitted...

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:Thinking of the children by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      for the sake of the children.... the classic argument of the fascist.

      please.... you know what China will do? declare buildings to be schools near cafes.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Thinking of the children by In-Doge · · Score: 1

      The main causes given for the closures is locating a Cybercafé right next to a school and allowing minors free access to pornography....... They also restrict violent games to certain age groups, which is different to the age requirements we have on our computer game boxes, how exactly?

      Nowhere in the article does it state that the porn and video game bans are restricted to just minors.

      Which is not right and not suprising. Isn't porn illegal in India, period, too? Wtf?

      Seriously. Some countries need to wake up, get with the 21st century and ditch the government sanctioned moral repression already.

    3. Re:Thinking of the children by Zocalo · · Score: 1
      Nowhere in the article does it state that the porn and video game bans are restricted to just minors.

      Not directly, although it did seem to implied from the overall "thinking of the children" tone of the article, and it did mention "age groups". Of course, we've all seen how the cry of "Won't someone think of the children?" has been abused to leverage someone's own personal agenda across the board, regardless of age.

      As to the porn angle, I couldn't agree more and said so in my original post. Immoral should not automatically imply illegal, which is the stance that China has adopted and is also the case to an even greater degree in India and many Islamic countries. I'm all for legal restrictions to hopefully only allow access to those mature enough to deal with the issues, but an outright ban is absurd. I'd put such legislation right up there with road speed regulations and copyright law; most people just don't care about the law. Besides, although this obviously doesn't apply to China, most of this kind of legislation is made on religious grounds, it's a sin and so on, so why not let God be the judge, hmm?

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Thinking of the children by radish · · Score: 1

      India is a democracy. If the majority of people believe that porn should be illegal, then it should be. That's what a democracy is all about.

      Porn used to be illegal in the UK, but then it was demonstrated that public opinion had changed, and now it's legal. That's how it's supposed to work.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  53. Re:And how many thousands... by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

    Greek? We speak english here. archy means to rule Oilarchy - rule for oil...or woodside

  54. Re:And how many thousands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the "barbarians" in Europe couldn't stand Roman rule and ultimately pitched us into the Dark Ages. Like it or not, the world is heavily dependent on the American economy. It won't be forever, but at the moment it is.

    REG: All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
    XERXES: Brought peace.
    REG: Oh. Peace? Shut up!

  55. Re:And how many thousands... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    Nah, he meant a caff, as in Cath's Caff.

  56. Re:Yay communism IOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, it hasn't helped American children.

  57. How can anything be accomplished in discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When any POV that's remotely controversial is modded into the dustbin?

    Close-mindedness does not lend itself well to earnest truth-seeking.

    I suggest reading these articles:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectancy_effect

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability I know... -1, Offtopic. You soulless bastards.

    1. Re:How can anything be accomplished in discussion by luvirini · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Well the way moderation on slashdot works is actually quite simple. A friend of mine did a study and managed to get his karma for a new account into excelent in 3 days with 18 total posts.

      The rules are:
      Post early but not first.
      Post something short.
      Be deep sounding while saying nothing.
      Make sure that you post in favor of the popular opinnion.
      Avoid any political discussion.
      It is best to be the first reply to some post that is allready modded up.

    2. Re:How can anything be accomplished in discussion by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      SHHHH!!

      For crissakes, man, it's a secret!

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    3. Re:How can anything be accomplished in discussion by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

      Well seeing as you're not really modded up, this reply isn't going to help my karma.

      --
      Nothing costs nothing
    4. Re:How can anything be accomplished in discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And... don't be an Anonymous Coward

  58. Re:And how many thousands... by planet-sloop · · Score: 1

    America vs Rest of the Earth in a big game of Roshambo....Rest of the Earth goes first.

  59. Inter net cafes around the world by Tuffsnake · · Score: 0

    Well I cannot say for China as I have not been there but I have been to Ireland. And while there my primary means of communication with people was aim and email in internet cafes. From my experience there was some guy working there who could care less what you did as long as you paid and he would usually marginally know how to fix computer/network issues.

    It was pretty free in terms of what people could and couldn't do on the internet but I don't remember ever seeing kids in the cafes. I want to say I remember there being an age restriction like 16/18 that seems to have been enforced pretty well but I had quite a few pints over there so my memory might not be 100% :)

  60. Re:To all America bashers, and China-philes by smallguy78 · · Score: 1

    The chinese are investing millions into electric and hydrogen based car research, so I doubt the first one will be right.

    --
    Nothing costs nothing
  61. How knowing you all are... by jandersen · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's interesting to see the comments here - everybody is so wise and knowledgable as to what the motives of the Chinese government are. And of course 'they are only out to cut off people's access to the hugely important information on the internet'. We all know that, don't we? Because they are evil communists; I mean that's EVIL, right?

    Don't you think the Chinese government already know that they can't keep easily accessible information away from people? These people are clever - they are after all bringing China forward, from being a backward and poor country to now being poised to overtake USA, EU, Russia and Japan economically, scientifically and politically.

    So why not try to think up something better than just repeating the usual drivel? Could it not be that these net-cafes are actually something that ought to be closed down? I mean, one thing is that about 99% of what you find on the Internet is worthless rubbish, but have you ever been in an average, Chinese internet cafe? I have - they are mostly small, cramped, filthy rooms where no attention has been paid to a basic thing as firesafety, not to mention that you can also very easily get much too close to the criminal environment; and Chinese gangs are not something that it is wise to get involved with at all.

    No, in my opinion this is a good move, and one that most Chinese parents are probably happy with.

  62. Re:The Censorship Technology Is Good If Used Prope by verus+vorago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wish I worked for an employer like you. I'm getting grief about coming in at 11am. The fact that I a) work about 20 hours per week longer than most and b) actually achieve things (unlike a large minority) seems to be completely beside the point.

    If your butt's not warming the seat at 7.30am then you've "got a bad attitude". One of the guys on my team has had several "attitude reassignment meetings" I'm still waiting for my first... any day now ...

  63. Ah yes.. the internet isn't that great a freedom by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Because it only spews porn and spam. And not... say.. stuff like the truth about corrupt administrations or corporate shenanigans or false media reports or uniting disparate peoples with similar ideologies or...

    Nope, not an important freedom at all (Coz, y'know fire is destructive and pollutive too, California's trying to ban it! ... just sayin! don't go beserk now)

    and 'sides... you can still access the internet in China through Net Cafes.

    Until now...

  64. This closure is nothing with evil government by everex · · Score: 4, Informative

    Becuase of the difference in cultural, you American sometimes cannot understand Chinese people. Something we think normal you think crazy. The reason to restrict build net cafe 200m away from school is that too many kids go to net cafes after school and spend too much time on computer games or internet surfing. Many parents complain about this. Another reason for closure is the porngraphy information. Viewing and keeping these pictures on pulic machines is prohibited in China. This is the same in pulic libraries in US.

    1. Re:This closure is nothing with evil government by manifoldronin · · Score: 1
      If I were a Chinese teenager, you bet I'd be willing to walk that extra meter to get to the cafe 201 meters away from my school.

      Viewing and keeping these pictures on pulic machines is prohibited in China.

      I don't know if you ignored the other (more significant and pertinent) part of the whole fact on purpose or you just didn't know better, but here is an FYI - viewing and keeping porn on your own machine at your own home is also unlawful in China and subject to police raid at any time (without a warrant, that is).

      --
      Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
    2. Re:This closure is nothing with evil government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god.This makes me weep. Protecting the kids. Over here in Europe we have porn on prime-time tv..so what?

      This is far worse (source AI ):
      There were at least 650 executions reported in local media in the months of December and January alone.

    3. Re:This closure is nothing with evil government by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Becuase of the difference in cultural, you American sometimes cannot understand Chinese people. Something we think normal you think crazy. The reason to restrict build net cafe 200m away from school is that too many kids go to net cafes after school and spend too much time on computer games or internet surfing. Many parents complain about this.

      Actually there is no cultural difference here. When video games were fresh and new circa 1980-1985 many cities passed laws about putting them next to elementary schools for the exact same reason. Kids would either:

      1. Leave for school early and spend their lunch money and arive late.
      2. Sneak off campus spend their lunch money and arive late.
      3. Hit the arcade after school and arive home late.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:This closure is nothing with evil government by Trifthen · · Score: 1
      The reason to restrict build net cafe 200m away from school is that too many kids go to net cafes after school and spend too much time on computer games or internet surfing.

      Right, because no child will walk more than 200 meters from school, and no child lives within walking distance of an internet cafe. Also no children have the internet at home, nor do they have any friends with the internet. Just because children are fairly bad at time management is no reason to shut down businesses.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    5. Re:This closure is nothing with evil government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you can look up porno at libraries in the US.

  65. Re:To all America bashers, and China-philes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia's still there, Einstein.

    And Russia still has more nukes than any country in the world (yes, more than the US). Somehow, people still overlook that fact.

  66. Ah, no CS for you! by Bob64 · · Score: 0

    Almost all the netcafes I've visited in China had tons of people playing counterstrike. It could be possible that China wants to nip any school shooting ideas in the bud. OR... they're adding a daily workout to the many kids. Walking 200 meters every day to get that CS fix.

  67. Re:And how many thousands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "Rochambeau" in pro-wrestling means hitting someone in the testicles as hard as you can. Is that what you're talking about?

    (if so, lol)

  68. expense!? by beattie · · Score: 1

    "Chinese authorities closed 12,575 net cafes towards the end of 2004. Due to the expense of computer hardware, net cafés have become very popular in China in recent years."

    Expense of computer hardware? Computer hardware has never been cheaper!

    They must all use Macs or something.

    1. Re:expense!? by dawnread · · Score: 1

      It's either that or the expense of computer hardware compared to their earnings which is what anyone with a working brain would have got from that sentence.

  69. Before jumping to conclusion by LittleStone · · Score: 2, Informative

    A lot of these net cafe are poorly constructed without proper safety facilities. A fire swept through an illegal net bar killing 24 and sending another 13 to hospital in 2002.

    http://www.edu.cn/20020618/3059163.shtml

    Not many businesses in China respect the safety standards that the western world take for granted. There are many ways, including bridery, to get around the safety inspections. So occasionally the government has to do some massive crack down. For one, to try to control the internet to please the critics in the communist party. Also, nobody would bride the safety inspectors if the government does not show that they are serious about the safety standards. A few weeks later these net cafe would be re-opened. And everything goes back to business as usual.

    Content censoring is always there. But that's not the only reason they close down these net cafe. Money is the reason.

    --
    A sig is redundant.
    1. Re:Before jumping to conclusion by shyampandit · · Score: 1

      Also, nobody would bride the safety inspectors

      lol, I think you mean bribe

  70. Re:To all America bashers, and China-philes by Elranzer · · Score: 3, Informative

    China-philes...

    The word actually is Sinophiles

  71. Slashbots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like the mods can't take an opinion that differs from the slashbot norm. So much for "free speech". Slashdot is about as free as China.

    1. Re:Slashbots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! Get used to being modded down for obvious Trolls. Try harder next time.

  72. Re:The Censorship Technology Is Good If Used Prope by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    if they're fucking around on slashdot all week they're not performing to the best of their ability, are they? I agree that blocking people from slashdot is a bit extreme, you should just fire them when the logs say they're spending too much time there.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  73. Re:To all America bashers, and China-philes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your internet cafes are belong to us.

    I think thats what you meant to say...

    You know what you doing!

  74. Re:And how many thousands... by luvirini · · Score: 1

    BTW, what do you think of the United States' actions in Guantanamo?
    Very proper for an Empire. Every self Respecting empire is supposed to hold suspected enemies in concentration camps: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_camp

  75. your comment == ridiculous by sczimme · · Score: 1


    [nurb432] Its their country, their rules..

    Let's take that idea to a logical conclusion:


    There is nothing logical about your conclusion. If you actually read the whole first line of nurb432's post, you will see that it says

    Its their country, their rules.. internet access is not a 'human right'..

    nurb432 is correct: Internet access is not a human rights issue. I can't believe you actually think it is.

    You then said

    We can go back in history and include Cambodia, Nazi Germany, ...

    Furthermore, I can't believe you tried to compare genocide/mass murder to the presence/lack of Internet access. Either you were trolling (and I took the bait - go me) or you really do believe what you said, in which case your ignorance is astounding. Here is a hint: no one dies from lack of Internet access.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:your comment == ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nurb432 is correct: Internet access is not a human rights issue. I can't believe you actually think it is.

      Well then, apparently neither is free speech, because that's what this is about. If that is your position then okay. After all, not everyone agrees what is a human right and what isn't. If you ask Amnesty, their opinion might differ, but who cares?

  76. Did the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, if you know that almost 100% computers in these cafes are pirated software and teens are doing nothing all day but visiting porn sites and play games, you know China government is doing the right thing.

    Don't prototype, not every move is political motivated.

  77. "There in the great US" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quote "took us time as well to reach a state where we consider these freedoms as our rights; give 'em time!"

    "You Americans" don't realize a lot of things about the rest of the world.

    1) No, All the other nations in the world (yes, there are other nations besides the great American one) DO NOT want to become like you !

    2) No, All the other nations in the world DO NOT consider America to be "the land of the free", instead we pity those few open-minded americans who are forced to live in such an opressive, freedom-lacking and propaghandistic enviroment.

    3) No , this is not flame, it is an opinion. But I expect you to modify it.. being American and promoting freedom and all ;-).

    -Someone from "the rest of the world"

    1. Re:"There in the great US" by Oracle+of+Bandwidth · · Score: 1

      So you'd have no problem if the US pulled everything and became totally isolated?
      As a reasonably independent American (I think neither of the American parties is good for America), it seems to me that some other countries seem to want a world community and multi-culturalism except when it comes to America (Just an opinion that I'd love to be wrong about)

  78. Re:The Censorship Technology Is Good If Used Prope by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's the otherside of the coin: As a manager/boss, I need to make the best use of my employees. That means if someone has time to screw around on slashdot, I am not making the best use of my investment.

    The trick is to find the balance; I want my employees to feel comfortable with where they work that they can take a break and goof around, but still get work done. Does wonders for moral, hence my employees are productive.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  79. Good thing by robyannetta · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing that China is cracking down on Internet Cafes. The last thing the Chinese government needs is for the RIAA and the MPAA to come down on them.

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  80. How moral is the Internet then? by DSLAMngu · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Let's step back a little bit. They call it immoral net use, and there are disagreements. What, then, is the degree of morality displayed on the Internet?

    Spam, porn, viruses, marketing, etc. And I can assure you that few children will go searching for MIT OpenCourseWare philosophy notes, Confician ethics, Maoist doctrine, etc. on their own. They will look for their favorite new music artists, information on the latest cartoon series, get on IM with their friends, or will just sit there and play flash games for the whole time.

    Have you been in a high school computer lab? All kids do on the Internet is waste time and expose themselves to information that they are generally not morally equipped to interpret. When they need to do research for a school assignment, they will probably find that the restrictions will allow them to get the info they need fairly conveniently. So perhaps the totalitarian government is doing the children a service by keeping them focused.

    On the other hand, I do not agree with the restrictions on adult consumption of the Internet. Clearly, at that point the government is perpetuating ignorence.

    Also notice how loose the copyright philosophies are in China. IIRC piracy is allowed, even encouraged in there. We have the RIAA, the MPAA, the DMCA, and media corporations with the nearly full backing of the U.S. government. Perhaps one should consider whether the lawsuits going around would count as oppression/repression to a communist.

    1. Re:How moral is the Internet then? by handslikesnakes · · Score: 1
      All kids do on the Internet is waste time and expose themselves to information that they are generally not morally equipped to interpret.

      Can you elaborate on this?

    2. Re:How moral is the Internet then? by DSLAMngu · · Score: 1
      Consider the popularity of sites like Newgrounds.com in high school computer labs (maybe you haven't had the opportunity to witness this first hand, but you might want to trust me). Content that might be considered unsuitable for children are making their way onto kids' computers all the time, and the parents/teachers may not always be capable of catching everything.

      I remember personally going through religious newsgroups as a twelve-year-old and engaging in and absorbing these debates without the capability to judge statements by people who had no real expertise on the subject matter. My beliefs and values were being shaped by people who didn't know what they were talking about in general. As a consequence, I almost became disillusioned from my religion at a time when I wasn't truly capable of making an educated decision.

      Perhaps one can separate the religious from the moral here, but very rarely do kids go to websites that foster moral growth. Who does? The Internet is not that kind of a place, for better or for worse. That's what churches, schools, and parents are for.

  81. My country. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    In my conutry, free speech ( the book )is a guaranteed right. So it would be a problem here.

    It is not a right in China.. Pretty simple difference.

    As long as basic human rights are not being abused, then its none of anyone elses business.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  82. Working In Factories by Moos3d · · Score: 1

    I think we all need to step back and take a look at this. First, think of how many cheap products, toys, etc.. are all made in China. They need people to work in the factories to make them. If people start looking around this "internet" it might give them thoughts. Now, how are they supposed to focus on doing their work when they have all this "free thinking"? It's common sense people.

  83. Defense Of Other Governments by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No, I wasn't defending the Chinese 'government'. I only was defending its actions in this particular case.

    if they run around cutting peoples hands off for fun, that's wrong. And the international community has an obligation to do something about it.

    that they aren't allowed to surf porn? No, that does not warrant any outside action.

    As far as hatred towards America: If they dont like us.. to damned bad, i could care less, i dont like them either. DONT put me in that same class of people. The ones that are guilty for what we have here and have to apologize. They make me ill.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Defense Of Other Governments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that with a quick look your message looks as if you were yelling that "they" can do whatever they want because it's "their" country. (it takes couple of readings to realize that you might not support the same logic what comes to 'actual' human rights)

  84. Re:The difference is not huge, the Artists transfe by KtHM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right, because we know *everyone* who gets a record contract gets rich beyond their wildest dreams. *rolls eyes*

  85. They own the US govt bonds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's hope they pay us our social security when we get old.

  86. It backfires! by Loundry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Their censorship technology is the best in the world, and it would improve production if it was implemented in USA companies. How would it improve production you ask? It will, for example, keep people from reading Slashdot all day.

    There is a psychological phenomenon in humans that control-freaks consistenly forget. Anything that you deny to a human appears more desirable to that human. If you say, "You can't do that," then the person being addressed will tend to want to do it *more*, not *less*.

    For example, two children are playing. They may be playing in an ocean of toys, but the most attactive toy in the room to Child A will be the toy that Child B is playing with.

    For example, the USA has some of the most repressive laws against drug use in the world, yet the USA is also the world's largest consumer of these "forbidden" drugs.

    Also consider that "rooting for the underdog" and "fighting against the man" is seen as cool and hip in American culture. The "rebel" and "outlaw" are seen as positive, not negative, figures in American culture. Didn't all us Americans feel some righteous indignation when the Imperial officer seethes, "You rebel scum!" to Han Solo?

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  87. Difference between communism and capitalism by presarioD · · Score: 2, Funny



    In communist China you have to ask permission for your basic rights... (and have them refused of course...)

    In capitalist US you have to pay for your rights... (again and again and again...)

    --
    Yam, yam, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade, uga booga, yam, yam, yade, yade
    1. Re:Difference between communism and capitalism by burndive · · Score: 1
      In capitalist US you have to pay for your rights... (again and again and again...)

      ...in blood, and it's worth every drop!

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  88. what most people already know .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... namely, how to have sexual intercourse? According to TFA, most websites that are blocked contain pornography. Other "strict" rules have to do with protecting the children (akin to town ordinances carried out on a national level) and fire safety. Please do a bit research before you post comments like that. Punk.

  89. More Civilized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...the main difference between countries as China and other more "civilized"...."

    I think China is one of the oldest civilizations on Earth. Anyway 5000+ years of Chinese civilization is much more than 200+ years of the US. I doubt that young civilizations are more civilized than old civilizations.

    I've heard the Chinese claim that their civilization is the oldest on Earth, which is however false. Summerian and Egiptian civilizations are older. Summer is dead but the Coptic Christian civilization in Egipt, follows the Egiptian ways desipte of 1400 years of Arabic occupation.(Christians in Irak claim to be the offspring of the ancient Assirians, but Assiria is (slightly) younger than China)

    Chinese and Coptic people have had over 5000 years to become civilized, while the Americans have had only 200 years.

    BTW I am neither Chinese, Assirian, Coptic or American.

    1. Re:More Civilized? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I think you are mixing terminology here. I don't really consider the United States a civilization, so much as one particular political and regional branch of Western civilization (including the Americas and Europe). European civilization, depending upon whether you choose to start at the Greeks, Celts or Romans, has certainly been around far longer than 200 years.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:More Civilized? by KiroDude · · Score: 1

      No one noticed I double quoted civilized ??

  90. No one expects the Spanish Inquisition! by Hellburner · · Score: 1

    sczimme: "Here is a hint: no one dies from lack of Internet access."

    And yet...its a slippery slope. Hate to drop that cold war buzzphrase.

    They hassle net cafes in China. Here ("USA!"tm) the Friendly Brothers of Inquiry can get a list of the books you check out from a library. Because you MIGHT be up to something...

    Soviets used to hand-make books and burn copies of copies of copies of audiotapes to pass dissident information or --- music --- to one another.

    I understand the non-equivalence of passing copies of Pasternak and getting the new episode of Galactica.

    Domination of the flow of information is the key to political power. I know I'm ripping someone off and subconsciously paraphrasing that --- but who?

    Or at least that's what my telescreen told me. I hate that traitor Goldstein!

    AMERICA HAS ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH IRAN.

  91. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our bars card people and don't let children in (generally) so internet access is not a problem.

    Too bad your government is that stupid, mr. troll.

  92. The Irony by megarich · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Chinese government has enough power to shut down internet cafes but yet they still can't keep their population size in check....go figure.

    1. Re:The Irony by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      shutting down the cafes is trivial. But If they ever wish to stop all information exchanges via the internet, that will be a very different thing

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  93. Then Boycott Chinese Products by copponex · · Score: 1

    Wal-mart is the #1 retailer in the US. We love paying low, low prices for cheap, cheap labor. I laugh whenever I see "WWJD" and "Praise the Lord!" on the vehicles parked outside of a Wal-mart, where 95% of the goods are from an Atheist, communist country. If you really believe what you say, then start boycotting Chinese products. You'll soon find your consumerist life empty because you can't get any electronics product, period.

    We foam at Bush because we know the only difference between China and the US is the ACLU, and that Oceana would be Christian, and Eastasia would be Atheist. Bush has already said that a dictatorship would be much easier. I have no doubt that if he felt he could lead a successful coup d'etat, he would. He believes God wants him to be President, and he is so delusional that he sees a 51% majority as a "mandate from the people."

    What's the difference between Che Guevara and a hugely successful CIA guerilla that we all sponsor with our tax dollars? The color of their skin and their country of origin. Worship one, you're a patriot; worship the other, and you're a traitor.

    1. Re:Then Boycott Chinese Products by mi · · Score: 1
      If you really believe what you say, then start boycotting Chinese products. You'll soon find your consumerist life empty because you can't get any electronics product, period.

      "My consumerist life"? Aren't we being just a bit presumptious here in extrapolating respect for Bush and condemnation of Che Guevara into living a "consumerist life" (whatever that means)?.. I do boycot Chinese product actualy. I do it practically -- I refuse to buy China-made, unless there is nothing else in the category, that I'm shopping for -- whatever the price. Salespeople think, I'm "patriotic" or quality-consious...

      We foam at Bush because we know the only difference between China and the US is the ACLU

      What, even the presence of Clinton and Dean don't make a difference? Joking...

      No. I hinted at the difference in my original post (Score 1. Insightful). The capitalism in US (and some other countries) is rooted in the idea of personal freedom. In China it is planted into the unfree society only as a more efficient way of doing things.

      I have no doubt that if he [Bush -mi] felt he could lead a successful coup d'etat, he would.

      Really? You mean, like Castro and his top henchman Comrade Che did? I wonder how you (personally) feel about Hugo Chavez, who broke both (old and new) of his country's Constitutions in his grab for more power... Did not prevent him from being an honor speaker at the World Social Forum, though. That despite him claiming Bolivar (a very rich landowner) to be his personal hero even...

      What's the difference between Che Guevara and a hugely successful CIA guerilla that we all sponsor with our tax dollars?

      Very simple -- CIA fought Communism. The results may not always be perfect, but they are better than the alternative. Say what you want about Pinochet (CIA's success), but his rule resulted in far less blood than Castro's (despite Chile being a lot larger than Cuba -- CIA's failure) and today Chile has South America's strongest economy, while Cuba remains a dump (despite billions of dollars worth of past Soviet aid).

      Worship one, you're a patriot; worship the other, and you're a traitor.

      What's so surprising? CIA is part of America's government, while che guevaras are your country's sworn enemies -- "worshiping" them certainly makes you a traitor...

      I dare say, we all hate bin Laden today, but your son/grandson may well be making a fashion statement with bin Laden's (or Zarqawi's) photo in his time of "youthful rebellion". After all, they resisted America, and that's a good thing, right?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  94. Chinese are more civilized than Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For over 5000 thousand Chinese lived in a civilized, strictly regulated society, where following the rules is everything. Unruly behavior has always been severely punished. This is civilization!

    By comparison, only 140-150 years ago, in the 'Wild West', Americans were savages, people with guns did whatewer they wanted, law and order meant nothing. Not only that, but this savage behavior is glorified in Western movies as something great! Is this civilization?

    1. Re:Chinese are more civilized than Americans by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      What a ludicrous thing to say. The Wild West was not the sum and total of American culture at the time. I'll wager that in any frontier region where the distance to any sort of large scale government is great you are going to have lawlessness. Certainly China had its own share of banditry along those distant border regions.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  95. You know you've been studying... by jellisky · · Score: 1

    ... physics too much when you start thinking:

    Mass closure of Net Cafes? Since when would China care about the mass fluxes going in and out of their cafes and making sure all that stays balanced? Are Net cafes there mass sinks or sources? I thought things like that should be naturally balanced, right? ... ... ...

    Never mind.

    -Jellisky

  96. Think of the children by killtherat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now I can see why some might argue that you can't have internet access within 150 feet of where children congregate (I'm not saying it's logic, but I can see where the argument comes from).
    But for some reason, I keep thinking there is a more insidious reason for this rule. The internet, by and large, is the ultimate expression of free speech and thought. It's the best place to get info of different ways of thinking. You wouldn't want to expose the mass populous to alternate ways of thinking until you've made sure that you've properly indoctrinated them.

  97. Re:The Censorship Technology Is Good If Used Prope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny that, Cisco is one of the main contractors for their new police-handheld-read-all-your-email-PDA they've deployed... you could go ask them to hook you up too.

  98. Been a rought couple of years for lady liberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between China's and GWB's actions, freedom and rights have taken major hits over the last 3 years.

  99. Proof? by katharsis83 · · Score: 1

    Christian pastors are being tortured JUST for talking about Christianity? No offense, but I'd like to see some proof for this. Christianity is not one of those things that the CCP goes crazy over...

    It seems like torturing Christian pastors would only be done if they were also major democratic reformists (which is pretty damn bad too); doing it just because of religion seems like an incredibly retarded PR move especially considering the way the US voted in 2004.

    Can you give me a link/article?

  100. Info may get out, but it has no real potency by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right, and what I'm saying, is that once the info's out there, and as long as it's got a important enough value to the people, it's likely to get to them one way or another.

    I used to believe that.

    Now I no longer do.

    There is all kinds of information on the Bush administration that people, including those that served in his first administration, were desperate to get out to the American public, including specifics on his incompetence with respect to guarding against terror, the war on terror, the misinformation on Iraq, etc.

    Yet we reelected him, and over half the people in the country believe Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attacks, despite proof to the contrary that hasn't only been bandied about on the internet, but has been reported in "mainstream" media news outlets as well.

    The information may get out, but misinformation from "official" sources is clearly more potent in the perceptions of the mindless masses. The evidence of that is nowhere as clear (or discouraging) as here in America.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Info may get out, but it has no real potency by phuturephunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would suppose that has more to do with mass psychology rather than the info not being out there. It's been proven time and time again (with some spectacular failures that took a whole lot of life with them) through the history of time that humans will believe whoever believes in their purpose the most.

      I think it has something to do with people basically being terrified of the unknown and the uncertainty in life. This is why we have constructs like Religion, its all just coping mechanisms.

      The danger is when someone with the wrong idea gets enough steam behind him/her to gather a following that then turns into a legion of people all saying the same thing and believing the same thing even in cases where contrary evidence is right in their faces. They almost HAVE to believe because the chaotic truth proves much to scary for them to cope with.

      or something to that effect..

  101. American and the death penalty... by katharsis83 · · Score: 0

    "I guess hatred of America is so strong these days that the Slashbots feel compelled to defend every other government, even some of the most despotic and totalitarian."

    Sorry to burst your bubble but many, many Europeans consider America to be a brutal country with inhuman punishment policies. The death penalty, Guantanomo Bay, and the arbitrary detainment of many of their citizens have seriously changed their views of America.

    Thus, in the eyes of many of the world, while not as bad as Pol Pot/Cambodia, America is not a beacon of freedom.

    You don't get to judge other countries without being judged yourself.

    1. Re:American and the death penalty... by Lost+Phoenician · · Score: 1

      Look at the other inhumanities America has inflicted on the world: Friends McDonalds '-ize' endings to nouns The Lucy Show Root Canal Surgery Alien conspiracy theory Janet Reno The prosecution rests............

      --
      Its later than you think.....your watch has stopped.......
  102. Re:And how many thousands... by danielobvt · · Score: 0

    Good luck in trying that and not taking a good chunk of the world down at the same time. If people thought the Great Depression of the 20's-30's was bad, imagine how bad it would be now with the massively interconnected economies of the world.

  103. Re:And how many thousands... by gobbo · · Score: 1

    Um. Common usage in Canada for the past few years has been "oiligarchy"--because it is a better pun, eh.

  104. People just don't care by egy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think it just too hard for us to understand china people. They have totally different culture from european/american, so they care more about where to get food than of human rights or freedom.

    I am from Ukraine, and in November, when it was Orange Revolution here in Ukraine, I've read various people comments on bbc.com on that topic (our revolution). While most comments were positive, I remember one comment from china's women; she was very negative and said that people should better care about other things as food, money and such.

    May be for china people it's acceptable that your goverment are gangsters and thiefs as long as they give you enouth food. For me, it isn't.

    PS. Sorry for my bad English.

    1. Re:People just don't care by ywl · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying what she and some Chinese people are making the right choice - history is complex and unpredictable.

      However, the Chinese government is giving out more than just enough food though. The economic growth has been double digits for more than a decade. Many people have grown from penniless to middle-class; some might have even become millinaires.

      It might be hard for Chinese people to understand the concern of Ukrainians. But I guess it's equally hard for you to understand what a stable government and economic prosperity has done to the average Chinese people without seeing it first-hand for more than 10 years.

      Given so many examples of Asian countries (Korean, Taiwan and to a certain extent Japan), who had put economy before politics, have now managed to developed into a modenized and prosperous democracy, I won't be surprised if Chinese want to follow the same path. Even if some of them cared about democracy, they could still wait.

      One more thing: I'm not them, greedy and corrupted some of them might be, the Chinese officials are not gangster and thief. These words are too strong for them. Not sure about those in Ukraine, though - that's your country.

    2. Re:People just don't care by egy · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right, I shouldn't call them so. But given my expirience living in totalitarian - post-totalitarian societies I doubt they (Chinese authorities) are nice guys, thought. My point was that there are strong cultural differences between Europe and China and democracy doesn't matter is Asia too much. And it's possible due to that differences to build effective economics in totalitarian country in Asia as opposed to Eastern Europe, so many Chinese people can live without some freeedoms given substantial economical growth.

    3. Re:People just don't care by ywl · · Score: 1


      I understanding your point. Not calling them gangsters or thieves is more for being accurate than to defend them. Nobody is a nice guy. Everybody in power will somehow abuse his position. It's just a matter of check-and-balance.

      Actually, I believe the economic performance of the Eastern Asian nations are the exceptions, rather than the norms. Each of the little tigers had, and now China have some advantages, capital influx, business know-how, social culture that, I guess, Ukraine and other Eastern European countries don't have. Moreover, each of them has several decades of stable environment (even for China, who started the economic reform in early 1980s) for economical development.

      So, to a certain sense, it's that Chinese lady who doesn't understand (she should have known better and shut up :). The fact that an authoritarian government can lead to economical prosperity in eastern Asia doesn't mean the same thing can apply to other societies and cultures.

  105. Do I have to spell it all out for you? by swb · · Score: 1

    Furthermore, I can't believe you tried to compare genocide/mass murder to the presence/lack of Internet access. Either you were trolling (and I took the bait - go me) or you really do believe what you said, in which case your ignorance is astounding. Here is a hint: no one dies from lack of Internet access.

    Do I have to spell it out for you? How many fucking Chinese citizens were killed by the Chinese government in Tiananmen Square while advocating for the non-human rights of freedom of expression?

    Is that not close enough to "ethnic cleansing"/"genocide"/"mass killing" for you, skippy, or do you need something else? I haven't even brought up the "Great Leap Forward" or any of the other Maoist "innovations".

    Keep going, though, you, like so many of your pals, believe that taking away all the small aspects of the big rights is just fine. Keep believing it, as your attitude is giving them all the encouragement they need to take them away.

  106. My experience in China by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was in China not too long ago (2003 - beginning of 2004) and teaching English. One thing that was interesting was the stuff that I heard about Falun Gong. How supposedly people from Falun Gong had poisoned local beggars, it was a cult.

    In the states, you never hear these rationales for the crackdowns against Falun Gong. They're not even brough up to be discredited, which makes me wonder if they're true or not?

    More to the point, is the American gov't not explaining China's good reasons for cracking down on Falun Gong so that it keeps their citizens feeling superior to the Chineese? "Oh, we have religious freedom and they don't" etc. When the worst abuses against religion happened during the Cultural revolution, or currently against those religious groups with separatist ambitions (or who just don't want their land exploited by the influx of the ethnic Han majority) such as some Muslims in Xinjiang, Buddists in Tibet, etc.

    A while ago, there was the whole issue of the Chinese embassy bombing in Belgrade by accident.

    The Chinese line was that it was deliberate and pointless. The American line was that it was an accident. The London guardian at one point ran a piece on how the Chinese embassy had been quite likely rebroadcasting radio signals from Serb forces in violation of the laws governing embassies (neutrality) and how the bombing run that hit the embassy was the only one which didn't go through the NATO chain of command, but came directly from the CIA.

    And how much did we in the states hear about this second, more likely explanation?

    There were a few internet sites blocked in China. And it was hard to tell which ones were deliberate and which ones were accidental since there seemed to be very little set policy on the matter. China may censor, but it seems to lack the rigid efficiency and formality that one imagines when they think of the USSR or Nazi Germany. The place is anarchy and clannish with an authoritarian frosting. Things like the status and power of your family, and which powerful people you have pissed off and how respectfully you criticize power have a huge amount to do with what you can get away with.

    The cultural revolution is over. The boys in power in China are mainly concerned with protecting their power and sometimes increasing it.

    And despite the attempt at censorship, there was a lot of information about government corruption which managed to leak out anyways. (Chinese gov't billionaires, Political elite getting away with murder, etc. )

    If there's one thing I learned in China, it was how deftly the US government manages to control the information which reaches the majority of its citizens, despite the existance of a 'free press.'

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    1. Re:My experience in China by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > And despite the attempt at censorship, there was a
      > lot of information about government corruption
      > which managed to leak out anyways. (Chinese gov't
      > billionaires, Political elite getting away with
      > murder, etc. )

      It sounds just like old Imperial China. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

      > If there's one thing I learned in China, it was
      > how deftly the US government manages to control
      > the information which reaches the majority of
      > its citizens, despite the existance of a 'free
      > press.'

      WEll, I'll wager that the US's press is far more free than anything China's ever seen. For every news source that seems quite happy to tow the line (Fox News anyone), there are others that are eager to attack the government of the day on any issue.

      A free press isn't about excluding government propaganda, but rather about debunking it.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:My experience in China by jc42 · · Score: 1

      The London guardian at one point ran a piece on how the Chinese embassy had been quite likely rebroadcasting radio signals from Serb forces in violation of the laws governing embassies (neutrality) and how the bombing run that hit the embassy was the only one which didn't go through the NATO chain of command, but came directly from the CIA.

      And how much did we in the states hear about this second, more likely explanation?


      Oooh! Me, me, me! I heard that ...

      Actually, I'm pretty sure I came across it on the Internet. By then, I'd long since stopped watching network news. Some info came from print sources. But even 10 years ago, the most reliable news was the Internet. This was, of course, almost entirely due to the variety of sources. In this case, there were Yugoslav news sources on the Net, as there are now Iraqi news sources on the Net. You can learn all sorts of interesting things that the official news sources won't tell you. And some of it's even true.

      Anyone really interested in learning what's going on in the world can now easily find such sources and compare them with the commercial and government news. There's getting to be fewer excuses for ignorance.

      Of course, the Chinese government is one that's still fairly successful at keeping their own population ignorant. But give them another 10 years, and the Internet will be too important to their own business world. Then they won't be able to restrict their people's access without also seriously restricting their economy.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:My experience in China by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was amazing how certain cultural observations about China were as true today as they were 500 years ago. Linnaeus, in a catagorization of people which seemed racist when I first read it, described Chinese people as 'yellow, melancholy and flexible.' So I was kindof shocked when one of my friends in China started talking about how Chinese people were more flexible than westerners. Same exact words.
      They really have a more racial view of things there than is permitted in the states.

      Oh the US is extremly free. But I think the effect of that freedom in dubunking gov't propaganda is overestimated. It gives many people a false sense of security. The ends are the same, though the means are far less invasive.

      The US has a free press, but it's killed (some have said deliberatly targeted) foreign reporters in Iraq and managed to make sure that the folks writing the news were 'embedded' and saw things from the POV of the troops, only. The ethical diellema on the use of DU has been mostly silenced.

      So many of the major news outlets seem to fail to take a really critical look at some of the things that the government asserts.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    4. Re:My experience in China by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Oooh! Me, me, me! I heard that ...

      I'm glad to hear it! Honestly, I am. but I think you're the exception. Even today, most of the public seems horribly politically misinformed. None of the other people I went to China with had heard the alternate explanation for the bombing, nor had the PhD who helped me arrange the trip and had written several books on China.

      But yeah, hopefully international news sources and the internet will help to give the POV of several sides. So hearing misinformation from multiple sources including a few direct sources will give us a better chance to filter out the lies.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    5. Re:My experience in China by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      > The US has a free press, but it's killed (some
      > have said deliberatly targeted) foreign reporters
      > in Iraq and managed to make sure that the folks
      > writing the news were 'embedded' and saw things
      > from the POV of the troops, only. The ethical
      > diellema on the use of DU has been mostly
      > silenced.

      Well, from what I've seen since the Iraq invasion, there's been a bit of handwringing from all the major outlets (even non-American ones like the BBC). Clearly they have become (if they weren't already) uncomfortable with being the government's propaganda distributors.

      As to the governments activities re the press, my feeling is that the Administration simply tosses lots of sh*t at the wall, and hopes that journalists will be unable to disprove all of it. Deny deny deny, that's pretty much what governments do. The difference in the Western world is that when a journalist finds something to falsifies a denial, he isn't trotted off to some pleasant gulag for his trouble.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:My experience in China by scott_in_ct · · Score: 1

      In the states, you never hear these rationales for the crackdowns against Falun Gong. They're not even brough up to be discredited, which makes me wonder if they're true or not?
      This is because those in the US who know about Falun Gong- national journalists, government officials, knowledgeable citizens- know that these "news" stories proffered by PRC about Falun Gong practitioners is nonsense.

      They know that Falun Gong is a peaceful meditation practice that advocates selflessness and wholesome living by adhering to truth,compassion and tolerance. Falun Gong practitioners are encouraged to not hurt any living being- humans, animals, plants, small bugs, etc.

      Yet because the people practicing Falun Gong in China exceeds the number of CCP members, Jiang Zemin demanded that the Chinese government must eliminate anyone who practices Falun Gong.

      He figured this would take 3 months and yet over 5 years later Falun Gong is alive and well and is still growing despite thousands being killed for it while in police custody, hundreds of thousands arrested, tens of thousands sent to "re-education through labor" for it, and a massive spare-no-expense media propaganda blitz.

      It's like someone said previously, if you have the truth on your side, you're more powerful than those holding nothing but lies.

      scott
  107. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Must we continue the sore losing and cite small, questionable studies to try and back up our "facts". Your argument is old and since Nov 2, dead.

    You are a troll, but still get modded up. Way to go all you 17 yr old moderators.

    1. Re:Sigh by g0hare · · Score: 0

      Yeah, disagree with you and I'm a troll. Why do facts hate America so much? And you resort to ad hominem atttacks, because you have no facts, and you're an anonymous coward as well. Gosh I sure have been put in my place.

      --
      Vote Quimby!
    2. Re:Sigh by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      Yeah, disagree with you and I'm a troll. Why do facts hate America so much? And you resort to ad hominem atttacks, because you have no facts, and you're an anonymous coward as well. Gosh I sure have been put in my place.

      Actually, I think he was replying to my post (unless he called you a troll elsewhere, which is entirely possible). But as another pointed out, he made my point for me, qed. :-)

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  108. On the "death" of communism... by DesScorp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    " Indeed; Communism is thoroughly dead in China."

    Some aspects of it are.

    "The current ruling gang apparently doesn't even give it lip service any more."

    They give it A LOT of lip service. It's still in all of the major speeches during national holidays.

    "Thus, Communism died in the old USSR when Stalin took power and became in all but name a new tsar."

    That's news to Nikita Kruschev, who was essentially replaced by commitee. No one even knew who the "one guy" in charge was for a couple of years after his removal. Eventually, it was discovered that the Central Commitee picked Leonid Breznhev as the General Secretary. The party regained control after the death of Stalin, and stayed in control until Gorbachev. The attempted coup was BY the major powers of the party. So please don't pretend that communism never existed after Stalin. For all of the evil of that system, the party did pick leadership in an orderly fashion after that.

    "...the old Communist/Capitalist false dichotomy."

    If you REALLY think there's no difference between capitalism and Soviet style communism, then no rational words are going to sway you.

    "...not by describing them with foreign words that don't apply very well."

    When they stop calling themselves communists, then maybe we will too. Again, the Chinese leadership still embraces the Marxist/Maoist imagery and speech, voluntarily. No one from the West forced it on them, so please stop acting like we are doing just that. THEY (the governement) identify themselves as communist.

    BTW, there ARE still true believers in power in China, many in the military. They don't like the trappings of a market economy, but they do like the money it brings in to pay for planes, tanks, missles, ships, and now, the space program.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:On the "death" of communism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a false dichotomy not because there's no difference, but because it's far from binary. Not only is it a spectrum, it's a two-dimensional field.

    2. Re:On the "death" of communism... by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

      - jc42: "...the old Communist/Capitalist false dichotomy."
      - you: If you REALLY think there's no difference between capitalism and Soviet style communism, then no rational words are going to sway you.


      Do you even know what "false dichotomy" means?

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  109. Watch China by jgardn · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    For all the hype China is getting as a supposed new super-power to challenge the US, there is something more fundamental going on there. It didn't start in Tiananmen square, but it is continuing in the rice paddies and town squares.

    People in China have developed a distrust for government. This isn't news, because it didn't happen overnight. In the past, government was a partner. The people would give them taxes, their young men, and endure some pretty harsh rules from time to time. In exchange, the government would maintain order, secure a decent living, and protect the people from wandering Mongol hordes. Occasionally the government would clean up corruption or crack down on gangs and networks.

    This all started to change when Europe conquered China. No longer could the government protect the people! The people began to look for another way. At about the time of Chiang Kai-Shek, european style democracy was beginning to really take root. The people were beginning to prosper, and beginning to realize their power. They were getting a better picture of the true role of government, as a servant of the people, not as their master. Of course that awakening was interrupted by Mao and his hordes of communists. It would take a long time to begin reawaken the sleeping giant again.

    Nowadays, there are no Mongol hordes. The biggest threat China faces is arguably the best thing that could ever happen to China. Why does the government want to put a wall between the US and China when the US can be an extremely valuable trade partner? And not just an economic trade partner, but an intellectual trade partner? The people are beginning to see that communism isn't the answer.

    People in China have grown to understand that the cities in the US are paved with gold. Not literally, of course. But there is something that the US is doing that makes their 300 million strong much more wealthy, powerful, and intelligent than China's billions. They are getting a sense of what capitalism is all about. They are growing to appreciate the fundamental rights of man, thank to the beginning of a Christian uprising. They are seeing the weakness in the government, how they require the buy-in of the people or they can't govern.

    I encourage you to talk with visiting scholars from China who are getting their graduate degrees in our universities. They understand the real problems China faces, the real struggles they are fighting. But they also have come to see what really makes America what it is. They are probably going to be a compassionate capitalist. Yes, people should work hard to make as much money as they can. But that money should be used to employ other people or for charity. It's the duty of the rich to care for the poor.

    They see Japan, South Korea, Phillipines, and other countries, and wonder why, after 400 years of contact with Europe, hasn't China become like them. Yet Japan and South Korea are such small, weak countries in comparison historically. Why do they prosper so much? Why can South Korea boast a military that threatens even China?

    I watched on TV as an older women openly challenged the town mayor, a strong party member. Her grievances were just - the government displaced her and made promises they didn't keep. The look on the officials face as the cameras taped the final confrontation was one of fear. He saw that that poor, uneducated woman was far more powerful than he ever could be, because she was right. She learned that when you are fighting for a just cause, even if it is in your own self-interest, you can win. The message is getting out. People are learning.

    This internet-cafe closing thing will have absolutely zero negative effect on the progression of Chinese government to a true democracy. If anything, it will be more fuel to add towards true reform and freedom for the people.

    The pundits who are left-leaning say "Watch out for China! They will do what Saddam and Stalin could not do!" That is just wishful thinking. These are probably the same people saying ter

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    1. Re:Watch China by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 1

      Quite frankly, China's not ready for democracy yet. If China were to be forced to become democratic like Iraq was in the last year or so, imagine the chaos and destabilizing effect this would have in the region. For a country of China's size, changing the form of government like the former soviet union did would be absolutely disastrous. China will not likely to be ready for democracy until at least 2030 or so. China is in a rapid growth period, and things are already highly chaotic. They need to maintain stability. Democracies are highly chaotic. China is doing the right thing right now.

      I hope people realize and understand that in the short term, the Chinese may not enjoy the freedom and the benefits that people in western democracies have, but the government has the responsibility to look into the future and plan accordingly. It isn't always the case that the government forces its form upon the people. More often than not, it is the people that influences the form of government. In other word, the power of the people is what dictates the government. If the people feel strongly anti-government enough, and there are enough of them, they will change it. As far as the Chinese people are concerned, there's nothing wrong with life. The malcontents who cry for freedom are much feweer. Would you rather have a freedom of speech that you have not been accustomed to that doesn't even feed you, or would you rather be less free and be able to feed your family?

    2. Re:Watch China by neurojab · · Score: 1

      They are the same who boasted 10,000 would die if we invaded Iraq.

      Um... over 17,000 actually DID die. That's counting civillians; unlike the figures you'll get from the DoD.

    3. Re:Watch China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Two ways to end the war: (1) Kill all terrorists. (2) Convert to Islam. Unfortunately, diplomacy is not a part of either

      Since option #1 is impossible unless you're delusional, I assume you've personally already done option #2, right? I mean, you practice what you preach, right?

  110. Re:un un... by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    "Whoever modded this fucking bastard informative deserves a good sack. This guy is promoting opinions. There is no informative value in it."

    His opinions are right. He SHOULD have gotten modded insightful instead....

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  111. rebellious teenage angle by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The authoritories also dont want the kids to view p0rn or waste lots of time and money playing games and chatting.

    In Orange County California InterNet cafes have been associated with Asian gang warfare with occasional violent incidents. They are a lucrative business run by Asians (mainly Vietnamese) that are expected to "give favors" to the gangs. Second, they a "clubhouse" for Asian teens to congregate and have fun. Parents think their kids are "being studious" when they go out o the computer clubhouse, but the kids have other ideas.

  112. Interesting... by tgd · · Score: 1

    I guess we can see what side of the China story moderators on /. believe...

  113. ZERG RUSH 2MIN KKKKKKK? by RiotNrrd · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that the US has a shot at reclaiming the international Starcraft top spot?

  114. Re:And how many thousands... by gobbo · · Score: 1
    America doesn't really have an Empire, it has military bases scattered about the place but that's it.

    Yes, you're right, it is really a trivial matter. Oh wait... I forgot that there are over SEVEN-freaking-hundred of them. If a base in damn near every strategic location on the globe doesn't indicate a new kind of empire, then it's a meaningless word. Google for 'Chalmers Johnson' for a nice overview.

    The USA has minor holdings in both major oceans, like the remnants of any colonial power. Here's the CIA's listing of American "Dependencies:"

    American Samoa, Baker Island, Guam, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Islands, Navassa Island, Northern Mariana Islands, Palmyra Atoll, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Wake Island note: from 18 July 1947 until 1 October 1994, the US administered the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. It entered into a political relationship with all four political units: the Northern Mariana Islands is a commonwealth in political union with the US (effective 3 November 1986); Palau concluded a Compact of Free Association with the US (effective 1 October 1994); the Federated States of Micronesia signed a Compact of Free Association with the US (effective 3 November 1986); the Republic of the Marshall Islands signed a Compact of Free Association with the US (effective 21 October 1986)

    In addition to these direct footprints of empire, the US has the ability to recommend, set, and enforce policy over much of the world. Even Brzezinski points out that "Europe is still predominantly an American protectorate."

    The purposes of USA's military presence around the world are pretty clear to those on the outside. Imagine a German base on the edge of Bangor, a French base outside of Cleveland, a Canadian base in Fargo, a Japanese base in Seattle, a Venezuelan base in Miami. How would the locals feel? What would it mean to US nationalism? It isn't a disingenuous question. If you pooh-pooh the 'thought experiment' on grounds of impossibility, it is an indication of a disinclination to think outside of the doctrine of Pax Americana.

  115. I doubt most of this article by Laaserboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just returned from the supposedly closed China, and have much to say that contradicts the article. Most of the article plays on the ignorance of Westerners.

    The internet cafes were cheap (around $1 for 4-8 hours) and usually a bit dirty. I was blocked from no site except the San Jose Mercury News, and the site was back online in China the next time I checked. It was not the "Great Fire Wall of China" in action. There have got to be more than 100,000 internet cafes. They're on many, many street corners. Some are built with sleeping quarters attached. Maybe there are 100,000 registered internet cafes, but who really registers anything in China?

    I am sure many who live in English speaking countries read these things imagine laws might be followed and enfoced like they are in the UK and US. Strict laws require some enforcement. From what I saw and heard and contrary to what I read from the Chinese press, there was hardly a hint of control over the millions of teenagers online.

    If Chinese people are kept in the dark, it seems only to be about their own country (about SARS, e.g.). They often know many details about the U.S., including sports scores, movies and news.

  116. Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one may feel some benefit of these closures.
    If I showed you my plonk list, you would notice the abundance of Chineese netcafes on the list. I won't miss the attacks on my server and now perhaps I can reduce the number of subnets I have blocked.
    Self centered, self interest... yep, you bet.

  117. net cafes by Lost+Phoenician · · Score: 1

    hmm...maybe shutting down China is a better strategy?

    --
    Its later than you think.....your watch has stopped.......
  118. Oh please.... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    "Propaganda works. And you, I and the Chinese get tricked every day..."

    I hear this argument a lot from the paranoid Left and the militant right alike. However, as usual, the honest truth is somewhere in the middle. The truth is, the U.S. may be the best informed nation on the planet. That doesn't mean that her inhabitants will respond to it in kind however.

    Contrast this with China, or especially N. Korea where the media is tightly controlled by thugs. Where merely thinking aloud can get you put into a re-education camp and you have to admit that we in the West are in a very different situation indeed.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Oh please.... by Znork · · Score: 1

      "I hear this argument a lot from the paranoid Left and the militant right alike."

      I think that's probably because it's easier to spot the lies when you're on an extreme side. You'll spend more time searching for the lies of others. However, their failing is they're not examining their own side carefully enough.

      One could hope that the truth was in the middle, but unfortunately the middle of two lies is not necessarily the truth.

      For an extreme but pointed (and vastly simplified) example, take communism and fascism. Both can be two wildly divergent sides, but the middle might end up somewhere around a totally authoritarian corporate socialized state. As both sides would be promoting the differences between them, the entire propaganda machine would have a free-for-all taking out any anti-authoritarian ideas, and probably without very many noticing, as the main discourse would be focused elsewhere.

      The very concepts of left and right are really part of our own everyday propaganda, more or less willfully clouding and simplifying our thinking. They're extremely useful when defining and villifying the opposition, but close to useless when it comes to defining some reality from which to have a constructive and reasonable discourse. Perhaps they once had a meaning, but now they're simply used to create identity; those who we are, those who we are not, those whose opinions we wish to imagine to be opinions that are different from ours.

      North Korea is one beast, but not very relevant from the point of view of analyzing our own situation.

      China is more interesting, as it is slowly changing into something closer to ourselves. Apart from the propaganda picture of China, how different is it today, and how different will it become? While you'd certainly face a stronger risk of inprisonment from offending the state apparatus, how much of that is because the state apparatus lacks the more refined methods of punishment? Once the economy of the country reaches the same level we have, will the Chinese state be able to discard those tools and perform a controlled change, where instead of inprisoning the opposition they'll either ridicule them out of relevancy, call in favours and get them fired or tie them up in court and ruin them instead? Why inprison journalists when you can make the ones that matter write what you want under the threat of killing their access to the government?

      The means of oppression are many, and the most obvious and brutal are often the least effective. Eventually the power class realizes they can keep their wealth and power, and they dont have to spend as many resources on the authority machine. And maybe apart from some ideologists once upon a time, the keeping of wealth and power in the face of everyone from 'socialists' to 'free marketists' is what it's all about anyway.

  119. QED by Changa_MC · · Score: 1
    This amused me a lot, although in a sad and depressing way. You realize, calling him a troll for pointing out that Iraq was not involved in 9/11/01.. that just proves that he's right.

    Information wants to be free. People want to ignore information they don't like. People win.

    --
    Changa hates change.
  120. You worried about this? by Corson · · Score: 1

    Despite what has become a common belief in our western countries, life without computers and the Internet is possible. :)

  121. How ironic...Invade. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing I have to say is: When's the US invasion? If it's good enough for Iraq, then it's good enough for China.

  122. Re:And how many thousands... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    There is still no empire though, the US holds something like 14 territories whereas Britain and France hole 15 and 16 respectively and that is the real tail end of Britains Empire building.

    Whilst military bases might provide the US with a global military reach they don't generate any direct income or economic benefit which is the real point of Empires.

    These bases are also based on the countries they are hosted in tolerating their existence which is fine in peacetime but likely to be reversed fairly quickly in anything like a major conflict, at least in the areas where it would matter.

  123. Re:The Censorship Technology Is Good If Used Prope by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 1

    um..."we" may hate what the Chinese government are doing to their population, but I don't think we "all" do. And furthermore, do you think the Chinese people hate the Chinese government for this? The Chinese are hardly ALL unhappy about their government. I think a large percentage are quite content (ok, only those who are in developing areas and see great opportunities, maybe). Stop assuming that what you don't like about what the Chinese government is or isn't doing is the same as what the Chinese people feel about their own government.

  124. Re:The Censorship Technology Is Good If Used Prope by toddestan · · Score: 1

    If they can get what they need to get done, and have some time to look at slashdot, then what's the problem? The alternative would be to keep piling more and more work on them, no matter how fast they get it done. In that case, what incentive is there for them to work hard at all?

  125. Communists ALWAYS claim this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That every real-world example of communism implemented "wasn't really communism". Today's communists are desperate to disassociate themselves from every large-scale attempt of implementation because every attempt has been disastrous.

    It's the "No True Scotsman" fallacy in action.

  126. Apparently the truth hurts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep fighting your ideological battles with mod points instead of words and see how many people you really convince, lamers.

  127. OT: Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I agree with you in this case, the Republican response would be:

    Democratic Morality: Killing a murderer, evil. Killing an unborn child, good.

    All depends on how you look at it.

    1. Re:OT: Your sig by Darby · · Score: 1

      the Republican response would be:

      Democratic Morality: Killing a murderer, evil. Killing an unborn child, good.

      All depends on how you look at it.


      I certainly agree that a lot of things depend upon how you look at them, and I figure that would be the Republican response, but the situation is not symmetrical in that sense.

      The primary difference is that nobody is saying that abortion is good.
      Another difference is that I'm not referencing capital punishment whereas your response does (as far as I can tell).

      That's one of the fundamental hypocracies of the so called Christian right (who are neither) that they support capital punishment as that is about as anti-Christian an attitude as it is possible to have.

      The other main reasons that that response isn't the mirror of mine is that, in general, the people who are opposed to abortion are also those opposed to almost every way to prevent it besides passing incredibly invasive laws (Sex education, birth control etc.)

      Now, given all that, I understand that you were merely pointing out what a response might be rather than stating it as fact, and I completely agree with that assessment.

  128. Would someone please remind me.... by leereyno · · Score: 1

    ....why exactly it is that China has most favored nation status?

    Stuff like this fills me with intense rage. When any government attempts to control the free flow of information and ideas, it is as clear a sign of that government's illegitimacy as the overt use of force against its own people. The chinese government is a cleptocracy, a cabal of criminals who use their position to oppress and abuse the chinese people. If I had my way, they would all be put on trial and the guilty ones shot, preferably in public.

    This is nothing but further proof that they have not changed their ways since the Tiananmen Square massacre 16 years ago.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  129. Like in [Temple] Indiana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's kinda like in Indiana how there is a law that says you can't sell alcohol within 150 feet of a church."

    And in other news the moneychangers were kicked out of the temple.

  130. conceded by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    If Kerry/Edwards concedes, it doesn't mean that Bush/Cheney/Satan automatically wins. No contender could get the majority.

  131. Re:And how many thousands... by gobbo · · Score: 1
    There is still no empire though, the US holds something like 14 territories whereas Britain and France hole 15 and 16 respectively and that is the real tail end of Britains Empire building.

    Look, you obviously didn't follow the links in my post. The whole notion of 'empire' is being redefined. Some call it the New World Order, including Poppy and W.

    There are radical differences in the way hegemony is managed between the Romans, lets say, and the post-colonial period that we're now in; those kinds of empires can't exist now, for a whole range of reasons. Essentially, the New American Century is already here.

    Whilst military bases might provide the US with a global military reach they don't generate any direct income or economic benefit which is the real point of Empires.

    The relationship between big-ticket trading, industries, etc. and those who run the --empire, forgive me-- is so complex and profuse and obscured by sleight of press that it's understandable how people miss seeing a 'direct benefit.' Anyway, I guess you don't live in the commonwealth, or you'd know that that empire always worked hand in hand with business. In Canada we had the Hudson's Bay Company. I guess that makes it Haliburton in Iraq.

  132. We don't call it "net cafe" in China... (and more) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The most direct translation from pinyin (wang1 ba2) of a public house providing net access is called a "net"() bar()".

    What chinese people do there in "net cafes"?

    99% of them play games! Yes, from half-life to online games (You can't believe how those online games sucks here in China, I'd never put my fingers on 'em.)

    For what I know, the net cafes that the government forced to close is bearly 10% of the total numbers of net cafes in China. That's really a small amount of them.

    So, if you got angry for some communist government once again block there people from so called freedom and democracy and so on, I hope the information I provided can help you a better sleep tonight.

    As you've already guessed that I'm from China and right now sit in front of my own computer posting on Slashdot with adsl connection for about 10$ per month (really can't complain much about the low bandwidth).

    Oh yes, A long list of sites are blocked. But, hey, isn't the duty of every government to control their people? They are the governments, they are the same. The government controlled the media? WE THE NEW GENERATION DON'T READ NEWS!

    I surf the internet almost everyday. There are millions of teenager and young students like me in China doing the samething. We do have freedom, limited through. But there should be a process, shouldn't it?

    Don't like the Chinese government? I can't help and sometimes I'm pissed off by it either. But please, you kindly western people, please try to understand China a little bit more before make any
    judgements. There are truth about us that you should know, and I'm willing to share too.

    PS: Please excuse me for any gramma or spelling mistake.

  133. IBM, Intel bankroll Internet Cafe Chain in China by taweili · · Score: 1

    It's very entertaining to read /. comments on China. These Internet cafes are shutdown to plow the way for bigger, better and nicer franchised Internet cafe chains bankrolled by IBM and Intel!.

  134. Go China! by vidnet · · Score: 1

    For example, no net café is allowed to open within 200 metres of a middle or elementary school.

    Way to get rid of the kiddies!