the elected person is now beholden to the piece of shit corrupt plutocrat who helped get him elected, rather than beholden to the actual people
this is where you make believe that's not the case, or with great faked surprise try to imagine how or why the guys who paid for the congresswhore's campaign don't expect any favors or that the congresswhore won't grant any to them
proving you are a fucking moron or a malicious douchebag who somehow believes this isn't how this legalized corruption in the usa works
how does someone like yourself get your head shoved so far up your asshole you think just making believe the fucking obvious isn't fucking obvious convinces anyone of anything except that you are a dumb shit with bad intent?
you are perfectly fine with those with money having more influence in your government than the guy on the street
which makes you an intellectually dishonest sycophant at best, an immoral ignorant at worst
you honestly see nothing fucking wrong with the rich just corrupting and buying your government? you're just going to fucking pretend that's not the fucking issue here? why you are you such a malicious and/ or ignorant asshole?
this is where you respond to me making believe that the buying of your government isn't the issue here. what a stupid fuck
yes, you are correct. and we're going to choose to make sure plutocrats do not corrupt our government
apparently we have a few sycophant bumps along the road to saving our society and government like yourself- how are you able to post here on slashdot if you're so busy sucking on plutocrat cock?
The people protesting actually believe the reasons they put forth. If you are a cynical piece of shit and want to view otherwise, that's fine. You've simply announced your irrelevancy to any ability to actually understand the world you live in.
You would ban private ownership of armored vehicles, would you not?
i never said that and i would never do that you dumb fuck
maybe you can have a conversation with the moronic voices in your head by yourself. instead of trying to engage people by changing the subject and making believe they said things they never actually did and then expecting them to defend positions they never took
why don't you try respecting the founding principles of this country and stop trying to restrict the freedom and liberties of others. you are unamerican. genuinely
i doubt if you can find the ability to respect freedom and liberty though. you seem clearly malicious in your intent towards the basic rights of others and you obviously lack the intellectual capacity to understand simple concepts like public and private
you simply don't have the right to restrict people's freedoms in public you stupid asshole
if you whine "religious liberty" when you do that you are only announcing yourself as a dimwitted bigot who actually hates liberty
if you are in business and you deny someone on the basis of sexual orientation race religious affiliation etc you are denying someone the liberty of doing as they please in general society. you are standing against freedom. this is simple fucking common sense, nevermind the actual law of the land:
this is different than denying someone in your own house, or a church: those are private places. a mosque can deny you the right to draw muhammad on those premises, but no muslim can deny you the right to walk around in public with muhammad on your t shirt
they may of course scream "religious liberty" but what they mean, like you, is that they are whining they don't get to limit someone else's freedoms in public. that's not liberty
i would ask if you understand the difference, but you obviously do not. your intent is clearly malicious and you clearly do not have the intellectual capacity to understand simple concepts like public and private.
you're a dimwitted bigot, and whether you admit it or not, your low intelligence "opinions" stand against freedom and liberty and the founding principles of this country
i'm sorry you grew up in a shit hole. how that shit hole treated you is not magically the valid reference point for how the world works
i'll save you some time: i won't read what you respond with, so you don't have to engage me. you really don't have much credibility in my eyes, you're just a useless crank whom i don't have much respect for
sorry for responding to you at all, i'll try not to do it again
a right is a natural logical consequence of free will, codified into law in countries that understand human nature
additionally, your rights are more likely to be violated by your fellow citizens who are morons and/ or malicious, than it is by some authoritarian government bogeyman who wants to rape your rights just for giggles
please, dear glorious genius who has found out i am secretly a dastardly politician posting on slashdot: tell me how the fuck what i said is incompatible with " it is just as likely that there would be good people with weapons stopping the idiot trying to take over the plane"
because who someone has sex with has nothing to do with a fucking cake purchase
but what someone does in a church is very much bound by the purpose of that church
you can't tell the fucking difference between a bakery and a church?
a muslim store owner cannot refuse to sell me a pencil because there is a picture of muhammad on my t shirt
at the same time, i cannot go into a mosque and insist they allow me to draw a picture of muhammad there
do you understand that?
the restrictions in open society, average businesses, is not the same topic as the restrictions church mosque or temple can proscribe within their places of worship
if you really can't tell the difference between the two i have to doubt your intelligence
if i deny business with someone for an unrelated reason, like sexual orientation, i am restricting that person's liberty for no valid reason
you have a right to do what you want, UNLESS what you do restricts someone else's rights
it's not complicated. you are the one twisting the fucking obvious
i was almost hoping you were a troll. it's a little depressing there's morons out there like you who actually believe restricting someone else's liberty is part of their liberty
you are against freedom. you genuinely are. in your own words. and you're too fucking stupid to understand how you are
it's kind of like the guy who never bathes and smells like stale urine who thinks people avoid him because he's so tough
so yeah, we're wimps because we're suspicious of a socially retarded loser with an ego problem walking around with a chip on their shoulder and carrying heavy weaponry
yeah, it's because we're wimps, that's the reason, yup
i give you permission to never read a comment of mine ever again
i don't actually have any authority to give you such permission, but since you like to pretend you have some authority to police my writing, i guess we have to play your retarded game to get the fucking simple point across
Slashdot Mirror
that's not even the point you braindead asshole
the elected person is now beholden to the piece of shit corrupt plutocrat who helped get him elected, rather than beholden to the actual people
this is where you make believe that's not the case, or with great faked surprise try to imagine how or why the guys who paid for the congresswhore's campaign don't expect any favors or that the congresswhore won't grant any to them
proving you are a fucking moron or a malicious douchebag who somehow believes this isn't how this legalized corruption in the usa works
how does someone like yourself get your head shoved so far up your asshole you think just making believe the fucking obvious isn't fucking obvious convinces anyone of anything except that you are a dumb shit with bad intent?
you are perfectly fine with those with money having more influence in your government than the guy on the street
which makes you an intellectually dishonest sycophant at best, an immoral ignorant at worst
you honestly see nothing fucking wrong with the rich just corrupting and buying your government? you're just going to fucking pretend that's not the fucking issue here? why you are you such a malicious and/ or ignorant asshole?
this is where you respond to me making believe that the buying of your government isn't the issue here. what a stupid fuck
yes, the cage called morality. such a limiting factor. glad to see you don't let that get in your way
the sycophants are too busy sucking on plutocrat cock to think much about making any sense
yes, you are correct. and we're going to choose to make sure plutocrats do not corrupt our government
apparently we have a few sycophant bumps along the road to saving our society and government like yourself- how are you able to post here on slashdot if you're so busy sucking on plutocrat cock?
it's awesome how you make excuses while plutocrats corrupt your government
do you have absolutely any backbone?
including the retards that think money = speech?
"money = speech"
how to arrive at laughingstock moral and intellectual bankruptcy
if you purchase media time you influence opinions. if you deny this you are intellectually dishonest and/ or or stupid
to make believe media purchases have no influence on opinion is simply ignorant denial. your opinion is without merit
"In decision theory..."
I stopped reading there.
The people protesting actually believe the reasons they put forth. If you are a cynical piece of shit and want to view otherwise, that's fine. You've simply announced your irrelevancy to any ability to actually understand the world you live in.
that's so nice and condescending of you to assume the motivations of others in a self-serving way
truly you are an enlightened, peerceptive, patronizing asshole
i never said that and i would never do that you dumb fuck
maybe you can have a conversation with the moronic voices in your head by yourself. instead of trying to engage people by changing the subject and making believe they said things they never actually did and then expecting them to defend positions they never took
moronic thread over
the difference, moron, is that one is public and the other is private
http://civilrights.findlaw.com...
why don't you try respecting the founding principles of this country and stop trying to restrict the freedom and liberties of others. you are unamerican. genuinely
i doubt if you can find the ability to respect freedom and liberty though. you seem clearly malicious in your intent towards the basic rights of others and you obviously lack the intellectual capacity to understand simple concepts like public and private
you simply don't have the right to restrict people's freedoms in public you stupid asshole
if you whine "religious liberty" when you do that you are only announcing yourself as a dimwitted bigot who actually hates liberty
if you are in business and you deny someone on the basis of sexual orientation race religious affiliation etc you are denying someone the liberty of doing as they please in general society. you are standing against freedom. this is simple fucking common sense, nevermind the actual law of the land:
http://civilrights.findlaw.com...
this is different than denying someone in your own house, or a church: those are private places. a mosque can deny you the right to draw muhammad on those premises, but no muslim can deny you the right to walk around in public with muhammad on your t shirt
they may of course scream "religious liberty" but what they mean, like you, is that they are whining they don't get to limit someone else's freedoms in public. that's not liberty
i would ask if you understand the difference, but you obviously do not. your intent is clearly malicious and you clearly do not have the intellectual capacity to understand simple concepts like public and private.
you're a dimwitted bigot, and whether you admit it or not, your low intelligence "opinions" stand against freedom and liberty and the founding principles of this country
oh sorry, i just noticed the user name
i'm sorry you grew up in a shit hole. how that shit hole treated you is not magically the valid reference point for how the world works
i'll save you some time: i won't read what you respond with, so you don't have to engage me. you really don't have much credibility in my eyes, you're just a useless crank whom i don't have much respect for
sorry for responding to you at all, i'll try not to do it again
can't tell if trolling, joking, or serious
there's just too many morons posting on slashdot!
now i can laugh
a right is a natural logical consequence of free will, codified into law in countries that understand human nature
additionally, your rights are more likely to be violated by your fellow citizens who are morons and/ or malicious, than it is by some authoritarian government bogeyman who wants to rape your rights just for giggles
please, dear glorious genius who has found out i am secretly a dastardly politician posting on slashdot: tell me how the fuck what i said is incompatible with " it is just as likely that there would be good people with weapons stopping the idiot trying to take over the plane"
i'm waiting to be enlightened
because who someone has sex with has nothing to do with a fucking cake purchase
but what someone does in a church is very much bound by the purpose of that church
you can't tell the fucking difference between a bakery and a church?
a muslim store owner cannot refuse to sell me a pencil because there is a picture of muhammad on my t shirt
at the same time, i cannot go into a mosque and insist they allow me to draw a picture of muhammad there
do you understand that?
the restrictions in open society, average businesses, is not the same topic as the restrictions church mosque or temple can proscribe within their places of worship
if you really can't tell the difference between the two i have to doubt your intelligence
you're completely changing the topic
if i deny business with someone for an unrelated reason, like sexual orientation, i am restricting that person's liberty for no valid reason
you have a right to do what you want, UNLESS what you do restricts someone else's rights
it's not complicated. you are the one twisting the fucking obvious
i was almost hoping you were a troll. it's a little depressing there's morons out there like you who actually believe restricting someone else's liberty is part of their liberty
you are against freedom. you genuinely are. in your own words. and you're too fucking stupid to understand how you are
shoot outs on planes over control is more secure than screening people
okay, uh huh
this is the point where i leave the conversation, since you have objectively demonstrated that you are a genuine moron
if you don't bathe and you smell like stale urine you may be a social moron
furthermore, when i avoid you because you stink like old piss, you may think i am avoiding you because you are so tough and i am afraid of you
this is the same socially retarded "logic" by which you have determined that fear is what motivates my words
it's kind of like the guy who never bathes and smells like stale urine who thinks people avoid him because he's so tough
so yeah, we're wimps because we're suspicious of a socially retarded loser with an ego problem walking around with a chip on their shoulder and carrying heavy weaponry
yeah, it's because we're wimps, that's the reason, yup
if you're going to make things up that people believe and then argue against that, why talk to real people at all?
just talk to yourself and the stereotypes you invent in your head
it's not hard at all, i just don't care
why do you care?
if you don't like my writing, don't read it
i give you permission to never read a comment of mine ever again
i don't actually have any authority to give you such permission, but since you like to pretend you have some authority to police my writing, i guess we have to play your retarded game to get the fucking simple point across