Unemployment is ~ 4.5% in the US (and yes, I've read all the rumors regarding people no longer looking for work, but without ANY hard evidence or numbers, it's irrelevant). Unemployment in Europe is, on average, between 2 and 3 timeswhat ours is. I think I read Germany was even higher. My point is that introducing any mechanism where it's harder to hire/fire workers and where costs / worker are inflated will decrease employment levels.
In the case of IT, I think it will be very difficult to get a firm union membership as most of the highly (or even many moderately) talented people won't sign up. The top performers I know certianly wouldn't (and nor would I).
Why would I join an organization which takes a part of my paycheck to enforce a structure that limits my ability to grow in both duty and pay?
I hate the status quo that's the way we do it around here and that's what we'd create.
Further, we will cause serious damage to the economy through decreased productivity. I don't care what any stats one may cite. In having to work with unions at our data center (electricians, etc), it's a complete pain and simply put, they aren't as productive. I realize this isn't all unions, but the vast majority of the ones I've worked with were that way.
If you're going to talk about disparity between execs and rank-and-file, I agree, there's too large a gap. I just don't think unions will do anything to effectively address that.
OK, I think this response is a little rough, but I agree with you in principle. As a manager, I think it's critical to have people who can play nicely with others. I'm happy to have the exceptional person who's a little high maintenance and makes up for it in work ethic and talent. But I need a jackass like I need a hole in my head.
What does my personality have to do with my ability to perform in a job?
Answer: A lot. This affects how you deal with others, pick up new tasks, deal with stress, and make decisions. I don't micromanage, I don't babysit. I try to make the work environment decent if not enjoyable, make sure workload is within a decent range, and try to plan / organize for the future. My team is set loose on their tasks with little oversight beyond touching base (as I have responsibilities beyond management).
I step in typically to support my group (i.e. someone needs a good swatting).
I can't have someone with a personality defect. I'm not saying I need someone who's aced charm school, but I can't have Tyler Durden either. An engineer who's causing strife within or external to my team has a limited career in my group.
I'd much rather endure the brain damage of firing his/her ass via HR than put out an endless series of fires, and I've done just that.
So yeah, take the test. I know it's a little extra stress, but think of it this way - they're trying to ELIMINATE jerks. That means they recognize the need for decent people, even if this test doesn't filter them all out (and they never do), at least they are trying...
List out the current list of products that qualify as "Something Better" than SQL Server.
This drives me nuts. I'm NOT arguing with you here, but so often this is the debate, better-best-whatever vs. getting something that matches the needs of the business and (almost more importantly) the skillset of your DBAs and developers.
A highly sophisticated DB2 or Oracle 10g RAC system in the hands of junior developers is like putting a large firearm in the hands of a child. It's a bad idea.
That being said, we're one of those business units that "needs" Oracle. We use RAC in rather large configurations, need worldwide 24x7 support, 99.99 and blah-blah-blah. That being said, we're always looking for ways to simplify certian functions and absolutely reduce cost. Using a PostGRES or MySQL for reporting / long-term data retention, etc, seems a logical step.
I don't know how well these databases will deal with large amounts of data (2+ TB), BUT, it's reporting database. I think (and could be wrong) that to reduce cost to near zero the business would accept a slowdown on the reporting function for "older" data.
For us, SQLServer is out simply because I'm trying to reduce platforms and general complexity. I'm willing to make some exceptions, as long as they're reasonable, but we're UNIX, and I really don't want to add an entirely new platform...
Damn man. I was thinking the same, but you have a much more articulate argument. But _IF_ we're to get into a battle, why doesn't the UN have their own DNS for their domains? I don't see anything wrong with adding.us to the end of each US-based address.
Why should other countries be subject to our DNS policies. I personally don't see anything wrong with them, but if someone does, they should be free to go elsewhere!
Bin Laden was pushing for purification and removal of western influences in the early 80s. He accepted our aid in Afghanistan as we were convenient and a needed source of arms. But let's be careful, he certianly didn't like the US OR our ongoing influence in the region. Yes, the Gulf War inflamed this dramatically. While I can't remember if he singled out America prior to 1991, he WAS very much Anti-West and was NOT pro-American.
You haven't stated what you believe his TRUE ulterior motives are. Power in Saudi Arabia? Control of the entire Middle East? He was already very powerful from an economic standpoint (family money from their Saudi-based construction company), so I'm assuming you think his true goals must be pretty lofty...
Read his own literature! You talk about reading, then do it! He has written COUNTLESS times about fighting ANYONE who's not Muslim! The US is the most obvious target aside from Isreal.
Don't be confused, this isn't merely about a military event, this is a religious EDICT. As for the rest of the babble that is your post, it's not worth comment.
Bin Laden and al Qaeada are very clear on their objectives:
All non-Muslims OUT of the Middle East (basically any nation that is Muslim or that is CLAIMED by Muslims)
Spread Islam throughout the world
This isn't complicated. Did the US do some things that may have angered him more? Of course, but in the end, he wanted to attack the US regardless.
True, but it seems like we haven't heard of any audits for some time. I think MS would be very careful about actually following through with something like that. They might threaten, but if they followed through I'd think the media (local - definately, national - potentially) would be all over their @ss.
The last thing any corporation (especially MS) needs to be portrayed as being the evil corporation to a "broke school district trying to save money by using low-cost software". They'd be domonized pretty quickly.
I think MS is more likely to throw in VERY low-cost software (beyond current educational rates) to ensure they stay in the schools. As another poster put it - what kids use now, they'll be familiar with and use as adults...
Keep mind: Ford said the idea was to represent what an average system administrator may do, as opposed to a "wizard"
Now, the addage used to be, OSS isn't for wussies or Newbies, however, as Linux becomes for mainstream, it's important for default installs to have more security. This reduces the ability of some to: "Whee, installed and serving Web Pages!", but will also help secure a web that's already way out of control.
It's fine, IMHO. OSS groups tend to respond well to these kinds of issues...
Your attitude of making broad statements and criticisms (they were hardly suggestions as much as condescending remarks) with no backing show your lack of overall talent and ability to see ourside your realm. My statements were made based on the experience of my team...
Further, they USE those tools you mentioned. What's the use of SYSPREP if your target machines (even if both x345s) require subtly different drivers? BTW, I also do network and system architecture for a large company
Sorry for the late response, I don't know if you'll read this or not, but I wanted to answer with something meaningful. Tech guys who can manage are VERY marketable and WILL MAKE MORE MONEY. BUT , only if you can effectively do it! If not, you'll end up overwhelmed, miserable, ineffective, and you'll either quit or get fired/laid off. Neither is pleasant. Items to consider:
What direction do you want your career to go in? If you'll want to get out of hands-on tech, mgmt is a possibility, but so is sales, finance, etc. Come up with a goal position 5 years out, 10 years, etc and gear your decision to support that
Can you handle the Mgmt BS? This includes working with people (both those who work for you and peers, other teams, etc), making promotion/bonus/salary decisions, etc. Think hard on that, it's not that easy to deal with. Day 1, you'll feel over your head, after that - it should start to come easier.
Are you willing to give up the fun tech stuff? Not ebing hands on is harder than you think!
Remember to be persistent. My first few months as a manager were tough, really tough. But I was learning and then I started to feel more confident in my abilities. I'd say that if you aren't feeling comfortable and confident in the position within 6-9 (at MOST) months, you could be in trouble
If I wasn't bored today, I'd ignore this blather but...
"We use the same image for 345s that we use with 445s - no sweat." Uhhhh, but you're bitching that Windows wants the proper drivers for the hardware? So you're OK with "close enough" on your blades, eh?
Well, let's think a for second here. If the device is recognized and runs properly, what else is there? Higher-ups care that the machine works.
"Close enough"
What does that mean? Either the device works or it doesn't (under lead as well as not under load, etc).
...in order to make sure they're the most stable, most reliable machines they can be.
Subjective babble. Again either it works or it doesn't. Issus will come up as we perform load testing on these boxes. And we've seen very few. The issues we DID see were either poor custom app code, or Red Het crewing with the VMM, etc. As for the rest of the Windows/Linux driver question, I won't debate.
"Seriously. Windows is actually usually far more forgiving about fucked up hardware - it will either fail to safe mode, or disable the hardware.".
My statements are out experience with my team in an environment with lots of machines. And frankly, you have no objective evidence to back your claim.
As for security, these applications run using the Windows security model. I'll not get into a semantics debate. I hear the "it's the applications fault" mantra enough to ignore it.
BTW, I'm a manager. I don't actually admin the boxes, but am close to my team to understand their issues and upper mgmt to see the big picture there.
That's why. We have an agreement with IBM to use their hardware (golf course agreement - we send them biz, they send us biz) and for the most part I like it. I think their blade and 44X servers are GREAT.
However, they have subtle differences with each set of machines that come off the production line. You can buy 4 servers at the same time and each will be a LITTLE different. Linux doesn't care. We use the same image with blades that we use with 345s that we use with 445s - no sweat.
BUT, with Windows, 2 blades (or whatever) require totally different drivers to be installed. My team can image (literally) tens (and probably 100-200, although we haven't tested that) of servers at once - using Linux in about a day. Windows - won't work, the requirements for the OS to have just the RIGHT driver for each server is a bloody NIGHTMARE.
Another issue is access. A lot of applications with Windows seem to need admin equivalent access and then want that ongoing to change anything. This means a lot of people need a LOT more access than we want to give out! With *nix, we've managed to use sudo and scripts to keep those boxes better locked down.
Otherwise, to be frank, I don't give a r@ts ass one way or the other. I simply line Linux b/c it works. If we could get past the image issue, I could probably live with Windows (and just suck it up WRT access).
I agree here, but there has to be a level of authority. Note: I work at a large, soulless corp with lot's of politics, but here's what I've noticed/would recommend:
You are NO LONGER a peer. Do not act as such, it will undermine your ability to manage
Protect your people. I try to take the PM view I learned at IBM. I try to shield them from BS so they can focus. _I_ am the "bad cop" to outsiders who are out of line. I NEVER ask my folks to take that role.
Listen to your folks, discipline is ALWAYS a secondary (or later) tactic for addressing issues. I have listened to a lot of screaming from my team. If they're pissed, they barge in my office and let loose. They're not disrespectful, they're frustrated, angry, and want someone to listen and help. After they're done, we figure something out. I'd rather they yell in my office than at some jackass outside the group.
Honesty. Whether it's reviews, promotions, good, bad, whatever - be honest. Even if it's - I can't say right now.
Your tech skills will be gone soon. You'll have exposure, but at a high level. I finally had to give up on the hands-on tech stuff. It's not easy, but it's the way it is
Have a spine with upper mgmt. This doesn't mean shoot your mouth off, but be ready and able to say "no" in a firm but calm manner and help them "make better decisions" when appropriate. Holding my ground and remaining calm has helped me a LOT. You will be granted precieved authority beyond your title which can make life easier.
Look long term and don't get shaken my short term events. Your team will react in a similar manner to your reaction to news (merger, layoffs, uppermgmt change, etc).
ALWAYS remember - Karma is easier lost than gained.
Listen to older SUCCESSFUL managers who offer advice
That being said, I'm not totally certian I like this role, but I'm getting used to it.
He is GREAT! Just read this stuff. They just don't grow wackos like this anymore. And h3ll, without the Internet, he'd just be another wierdo talking to himself on the street.
This is more prophetic than most people realize. An edition of Fortune magazine (yes, I'm a loser who reads a magazine) a few issues ago spoke about Western companies doing business in China.
Under one of the stipulations for many industries (automotive was the focus for this article), the Western corp must:
Partner with a Chinese company
Share design and technical info
License design and IP in such a way that the partner company can create new designs from the original and derivative works are owned by the Chinese company
I'm not sure the details, and the writer was not technically apt enough to clearly explain them. Nonetheless, it seems we are actively creating competition over the pond. It would be interesting to know what kind of IP companies such as AMD, HP, Intel, MS, IBM, etc have to share and what the licensing agreements looks like.
I'm sure they're trying to be hard-nosed, but these companies smell dollars. In some ways I guess I'm suprised given how low income is even for middle and some upper class Chinese remains. I wonder how big the market really is...
Works great. I have a "psuedo" DMZ in my house. DSL modem has NAT and limited ACL-like capabilities (basically I open up all IPs off the modem to incoming traffic) and then I have another router behind that which rejects all incoming except specific traffic (from a machine in the DMZ).
But even for the average user, they're safe. Both devices came configured blocking incoming traffic by default. This assumes, of course, a non-bonehead default config in ALL devices. I'm not sure Wi-Fi routers fall in this category...
HOWEVER, when I was setting up my new machine (XP) I had to move the box from the "DMZ" to behind the second router (which is where it lives today). By the time I had started updating the box, I had already been hit with LSASS. Now, only a linux box gets to live there, although I'm thinking of adding a Solaris 10 box (what the hell, the old PIII isn't doing squat now anyway)
I hear ya. No we pay real salaries, but NOT bubble-level salaries. I'm not a poacher (b/c people will bail INSTANTLY if you do that) but we're not going to pay out the nose either.
I'm busy as hell today, but I'm going to look up some folks who contacted me. Drop me an e-mail with your resume and salary requirements
This is the single dumbest thing I have heard (at least the dumbest today). There is nothing you can surmise without know how the previous site was built and the skillset of the developers. Who knows the original purpose of the site, if they hacked it out to do something else, if the tech was old, if the site was poorly writtem, etc.
And your decision to place web, app, and DB server on a single box is a security masterpiece.
What's your failover strategy? Does this one-CPU marvel of science not have any kind of hardware failures? WHat kind of "large operation" has no redundancy to compensate for failures in production?
This post should have started with - Mary had a Little Lamb
It depends on the skill set and talent level. I manage a team of sys admins and network admins in Denver. We spent over 3 months looking for a senior person. (UNIX/Linux with decent network knowledge).
My company has been active in layoffs (we just bought an online travel site and have lots of "redundancies") but in speaking with a recuiter I usually use to GET people - he commented that he had placed lots of folks from my company who were leaving (either laid off or sick of the parent company - which I am as well).
Further - not to be brutal, but Colorado is tech heavy but had a LOT of scuds who were overpaid and underperforming in the bubble. Since, some talented folks HAVE left CO and others have found jobs they aren't willing to leave. The market for really good people is still tight. Where are you located and what's your skillset? I could always use a bad@ss Linux/*nix admin...
That being said, our governor IS worthless
Re:A Microsoft Defender Speaks Out
on
How Tomcat Works
·
· Score: 1
LOL, applications in Tomcat are supposed to be "disasters" from tiem to time! I was writing code on early versions of Tomcat and had a few problems that really caused pain, but overall liked the slim "footprint" on my system and it generally was fast (esp if I pooled some of the heavy-er weight objects).
Sadly, I'm out of coding now, but it was fun. I'm suprised to hear an MS guy going to Java/Tomcat (I assume Linux as well), most of the MS-guys I know are pretty hardcore. What's the driver here?
Not wanting to be rude - but do your own research.
If you're a student, particularly in a technical field, you should be able to google something and learn what it is. As you progress in your technical career, you'll spend a lot of time looking up technology and solutions. It's the nature of a fluid field.
My EE profs had no patience with students who wouldn't do their own research and I've been the beneficiary of that attitude.
Learning a topic is something that should be obvious. If you are to be competitive and desirable in a tough industry - you should be used to it
Slashdot Mirror
Unemployment is ~ 4.5% in the US (and yes, I've read all the rumors regarding people no longer looking for work, but without ANY hard evidence or numbers, it's irrelevant). Unemployment in Europe is, on average, between 2 and 3 timeswhat ours is. I think I read Germany was even higher. My point is that introducing any mechanism where it's harder to hire/fire workers and where costs / worker are inflated will decrease employment levels.
In the case of IT, I think it will be very difficult to get a firm union membership as most of the highly (or even many moderately) talented people won't sign up. The top performers I know certianly wouldn't (and nor would I).
Why would I join an organization which takes a part of my paycheck to enforce a structure that limits my ability to grow in both duty and pay?
I hate the status quo that's the way we do it around here and that's what we'd create.
Further, we will cause serious damage to the economy through decreased productivity. I don't care what any stats one may cite. In having to work with unions at our data center (electricians, etc), it's a complete pain and simply put, they aren't as productive. I realize this isn't all unions, but the vast majority of the ones I've worked with were that way.
If you're going to talk about disparity between execs and rank-and-file, I agree, there's too large a gap. I just don't think unions will do anything to effectively address that.
At least I have a legit excuse (PHB)...
OK, I think this response is a little rough, but I agree with you in principle. As a manager, I think it's critical to have people who can play nicely with others. I'm happy to have the exceptional person who's a little high maintenance and makes up for it in work ethic and talent. But I need a jackass like I need a hole in my head.
What does my personality have to do with my ability to perform in a job?
Answer: A lot. This affects how you deal with others, pick up new tasks, deal with stress, and make decisions. I don't micromanage, I don't babysit. I try to make the work environment decent if not enjoyable, make sure workload is within a decent range, and try to plan / organize for the future. My team is set loose on their tasks with little oversight beyond touching base (as I have responsibilities beyond management).
I step in typically to support my group (i.e. someone needs a good swatting).
I can't have someone with a personality defect. I'm not saying I need someone who's aced charm school, but I can't have Tyler Durden either. An engineer who's causing strife within or external to my team has a limited career in my group.
I'd much rather endure the brain damage of firing his/her ass via HR than put out an endless series of fires, and I've done just that.
So yeah, take the test. I know it's a little extra stress, but think of it this way - they're trying to ELIMINATE jerks. That means they recognize the need for decent people, even if this test doesn't filter them all out (and they never do), at least they are trying...
This drives me nuts. I'm NOT arguing with you here, but so often this is the debate, better-best-whatever vs. getting something that matches the needs of the business and (almost more importantly) the skillset of your DBAs and developers.
A highly sophisticated DB2 or Oracle 10g RAC system in the hands of junior developers is like putting a large firearm in the hands of a child. It's a bad idea.
That being said, we're one of those business units that "needs" Oracle. We use RAC in rather large configurations, need worldwide 24x7 support, 99.99 and blah-blah-blah. That being said, we're always looking for ways to simplify certian functions and absolutely reduce cost. Using a PostGRES or MySQL for reporting / long-term data retention, etc, seems a logical step.
I don't know how well these databases will deal with large amounts of data (2+ TB), BUT, it's reporting database. I think (and could be wrong) that to reduce cost to near zero the business would accept a slowdown on the reporting function for "older" data.
For us, SQLServer is out simply because I'm trying to reduce platforms and general complexity. I'm willing to make some exceptions, as long as they're reasonable, but we're UNIX, and I really don't want to add an entirely new platform...
Why should other countries be subject to our DNS policies. I personally don't see anything wrong with them, but if someone does, they should be free to go elsewhere!
Great point though. Excellent argument!
You haven't stated what you believe his TRUE ulterior motives are. Power in Saudi Arabia? Control of the entire Middle East? He was already very powerful from an economic standpoint (family money from their Saudi-based construction company), so I'm assuming you think his true goals must be pretty lofty...
The fact that you're "Insightful" and I'm apparently a "Troll" highlights that at least you're not the only clueless one out there.
Don't be confused, this isn't merely about a military event, this is a religious EDICT. As for the rest of the babble that is your post, it's not worth comment.
Bin Laden and al Qaeada are very clear on their objectives:
This isn't complicated. Did the US do some things that may have angered him more? Of course, but in the end, he wanted to attack the US regardless.
The last thing any corporation (especially MS) needs to be portrayed as being the evil corporation to a "broke school district trying to save money by using low-cost software". They'd be domonized pretty quickly.
I think MS is more likely to throw in VERY low-cost software (beyond current educational rates) to ensure they stay in the schools. As another poster put it - what kids use now, they'll be familiar with and use as adults...
Now, the addage used to be, OSS isn't for wussies or Newbies, however, as Linux becomes for mainstream, it's important for default installs to have more security. This reduces the ability of some to: "Whee, installed and serving Web Pages!", but will also help secure a web that's already way out of control.
It's fine, IMHO. OSS groups tend to respond well to these kinds of issues...
Your attitude of making broad statements and criticisms (they were hardly suggestions as much as condescending remarks) with no backing show your lack of overall talent and ability to see ourside your realm. My statements were made based on the experience of my team...
Further, they USE those tools you mentioned. What's the use of SYSPREP if your target machines (even if both x345s) require subtly different drivers? BTW, I also do network and system architecture for a large company
"We use the same image for 345s that we use with 445s - no sweat." Uhhhh, but you're bitching that Windows wants the proper drivers for the hardware? So you're OK with "close enough" on your blades, eh?
Well, let's think a for second here. If the device is recognized and runs properly, what else is there? Higher-ups care that the machine works.
"Close enough"
What does that mean? Either the device works or it doesn't (under lead as well as not under load, etc).
Subjective babble. Again either it works or it doesn't. Issus will come up as we perform load testing on these boxes. And we've seen very few. The issues we DID see were either poor custom app code, or Red Het crewing with the VMM, etc. As for the rest of the Windows/Linux driver question, I won't debate.
"Seriously. Windows is actually usually far more forgiving about fucked up hardware - it will either fail to safe mode, or disable the hardware.".
My statements are out experience with my team in an environment with lots of machines. And frankly, you have no objective evidence to back your claim. As for security, these applications run using the Windows security model. I'll not get into a semantics debate. I hear the "it's the applications fault" mantra enough to ignore it.
BTW, I'm a manager. I don't actually admin the boxes, but am close to my team to understand their issues and upper mgmt to see the big picture there.
That's why. We have an agreement with IBM to use their hardware (golf course agreement - we send them biz, they send us biz) and for the most part I like it. I think their blade and 44X servers are GREAT.
However, they have subtle differences with each set of machines that come off the production line. You can buy 4 servers at the same time and each will be a LITTLE different. Linux doesn't care. We use the same image with blades that we use with 345s that we use with 445s - no sweat.
BUT, with Windows, 2 blades (or whatever) require totally different drivers to be installed. My team can image (literally) tens (and probably 100-200, although we haven't tested that) of servers at once - using Linux in about a day. Windows - won't work, the requirements for the OS to have just the RIGHT driver for each server is a bloody NIGHTMARE.
Another issue is access. A lot of applications with Windows seem to need admin equivalent access and then want that ongoing to change anything. This means a lot of people need a LOT more access than we want to give out! With *nix, we've managed to use sudo and scripts to keep those boxes better locked down.
Otherwise, to be frank, I don't give a r@ts ass one way or the other. I simply line Linux b/c it works. If we could get past the image issue, I could probably live with Windows (and just suck it up WRT access).
- You are NO LONGER a peer. Do not act as such, it will undermine your ability to manage
- Protect your people. I try to take the PM view I learned at IBM. I try to shield them from BS so they can focus. _I_ am the "bad cop" to outsiders who are out of line. I NEVER ask my folks to take that role.
- Listen to your folks, discipline is ALWAYS a secondary (or later) tactic for addressing issues. I have listened to a lot of screaming from my team. If they're pissed, they barge in my office and let loose. They're not disrespectful, they're frustrated, angry, and want someone to listen and help. After they're done, we figure something out. I'd rather they yell in my office than at some jackass outside the group.
- Honesty. Whether it's reviews, promotions, good, bad, whatever - be honest. Even if it's - I can't say right now.
- Your tech skills will be gone soon. You'll have exposure, but at a high level. I finally had to give up on the hands-on tech stuff. It's not easy, but it's the way it is
- Have a spine with upper mgmt. This doesn't mean shoot your mouth off, but be ready and able to say "no" in a firm but calm manner and help them "make better decisions" when appropriate. Holding my ground and remaining calm has helped me a LOT. You will be granted precieved authority beyond your title which can make life easier.
- Look long term and don't get shaken my short term events. Your team will react in a similar manner to your reaction to news (merger, layoffs, uppermgmt change, etc).
- ALWAYS remember - Karma is easier lost than gained.
- Listen to older SUCCESSFUL managers who offer advice
That being said, I'm not totally certian I like this role, but I'm getting used to it.It's better than unemployment. Bonuses are better
And they're EVERYWHERE
Then I noticed something I couldn't quite put my finger on. It was on the tip of my tongue, but could it? Was it? By Jove, I think it is!
This is the same, sorry, pathetic, "dialog" that SCO was putting out when they thought they still had a chance...
He is GREAT! Just read this stuff. They just don't grow wackos like this anymore. And h3ll, without the Internet, he'd just be another wierdo talking to himself on the street.
SOLLOG predicts: Being weird is KEWL!
Under one of the stipulations for many industries (automotive was the focus for this article), the Western corp must:
- Partner with a Chinese company
- Share design and technical info
- License design and IP in such a way that the partner company can create new designs from the original and derivative works are owned by the Chinese company
I'm not sure the details, and the writer was not technically apt enough to clearly explain them. Nonetheless, it seems we are actively creating competition over the pond. It would be interesting to know what kind of IP companies such as AMD, HP, Intel, MS, IBM, etc have to share and what the licensing agreements looks like.I'm sure they're trying to be hard-nosed, but these companies smell dollars. In some ways I guess I'm suprised given how low income is even for middle and some upper class Chinese remains. I wonder how big the market really is...
But even for the average user, they're safe. Both devices came configured blocking incoming traffic by default. This assumes, of course, a non-bonehead default config in ALL devices. I'm not sure Wi-Fi routers fall in this category...
HOWEVER, when I was setting up my new machine (XP) I had to move the box from the "DMZ" to behind the second router (which is where it lives today). By the time I had started updating the box, I had already been hit with LSASS. Now, only a linux box gets to live there, although I'm thinking of adding a Solaris 10 box (what the hell, the old PIII isn't doing squat now anyway)
I'm busy as hell today, but I'm going to look up some folks who contacted me. Drop me an e-mail with your resume and salary requirements
This is the single dumbest thing I have heard (at least the dumbest today). There is nothing you can surmise without know how the previous site was built and the skillset of the developers. Who knows the original purpose of the site, if they hacked it out to do something else, if the tech was old, if the site was poorly writtem, etc.
And your decision to place web, app, and DB server on a single box is a security masterpiece.
What's your failover strategy? Does this one-CPU marvel of science not have any kind of hardware failures? WHat kind of "large operation" has no redundancy to compensate for failures in production?
This post should have started with - Mary had a Little Lamb
Large Operation indeed...
My company has been active in layoffs (we just bought an online travel site and have lots of "redundancies") but in speaking with a recuiter I usually use to GET people - he commented that he had placed lots of folks from my company who were leaving (either laid off or sick of the parent company - which I am as well).
Further - not to be brutal, but Colorado is tech heavy but had a LOT of scuds who were overpaid and underperforming in the bubble. Since, some talented folks HAVE left CO and others have found jobs they aren't willing to leave. The market for really good people is still tight. Where are you located and what's your skillset? I could always use a bad@ss Linux/*nix admin...
That being said, our governor IS worthless
Sadly, I'm out of coding now, but it was fun. I'm suprised to hear an MS guy going to Java/Tomcat (I assume Linux as well), most of the MS-guys I know are pretty hardcore. What's the driver here?
If you're a student, particularly in a technical field, you should be able to google something and learn what it is. As you progress in your technical career, you'll spend a lot of time looking up technology and solutions. It's the nature of a fluid field.
My EE profs had no patience with students who wouldn't do their own research and I've been the beneficiary of that attitude.
Learning a topic is something that should be obvious. If you are to be competitive and desirable in a tough industry - you should be used to it