We are "professional" because it easier to encourage dialog when people are not afraid.
Torvalds believes that he doesn't have to play by the rules because he is some Linux god and the rest of us can suck it. This is only true as long as the rest of us let him.
The only two choices are not intolerable asshole and fake nice saccharine pantywaist.
He must be surrounded by people calloused to the abuse and too afraid to call it out as what it is.
So what you're sitting at home in your bathrobe? Congratulations on being a misanthrope shut in weirdo.
I don't see the practical application of something like this in a physical networked environment. Thinks like this may sound nice for permastudents' theses, but may or may not have a practical use without one hell of a architectural and best practices shift rather than just replacing a failed piece of equipment or rectifying a software issue and closing the ticket?
There was no transaction.
Mr. Anaya is not a mandatory reporter of a cash transaction to begin with.
For all Mr. Anaya knew, the money was withdrawn legally from an institution required to report, why should the onus/burden of enforcing the law fall to a car customizer?
They're obviously just smacking him down for not playing nice nice in their ever plodding damn fool idiotic crusade against drugs.
I don't think this sentence will stand on appeal.
IANAL though.
Yeah, maybe Esteban just had a really lucrative paper route...
It's really none of his business unless he explicitly knew he sold drugs for money, some people just have lots of money, that's not a crime in and of itself.
And a reasonable person would probably want to safeguard $800,000 in cash, regardless of source.
I have a threefold problem with "cloud" storage/computing
1) Lack of control/physical security, up to and including removing my access to my own data due to a violation of some cockamamie TOS or similar agreement.
2) No ability to remedy downtimes, while rare, still do happen.
3) The ability of government agencies to scan my data for whatever they feel like arbitrarily and possibly without due process.
Okay see what you are describing are best practices, which completely ignores the bad practices that organizations actually.......practice.
They do bother, since it doesn't cost them a damn thing to get an invalid address bounceback to an address that isn't theirs.
If you shotgun out enough messages about your 30 dollar dick pills and 1 percent of people buy them, congratulations, you've just made money.
I'd actually love to see a citation on this, I could google it but maybe you have an article handy.
I generally err on the side of brute force or social engineering rather than out and out "hack" or system compromise.
It could very well have just been guessed, the spammers' mail servers are more than likely more than capable of shotgun blasting millions of messages to $randomstring@domain.com in less time than you'd think, and if you change the replyto address, you don't even get the bouncebacks.
Slashdot Mirror
A fragment of a fragment further segmented and compartmentalized by carriers and hardware makers.
The community does the job of fragmenting the Linux community far better than Microsoft or Apple could ever hope to. That's the downfall.
Relevance and marketshare in which segments? Mobile and tablet? Absolutely. Business desktop and server. Not a chance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-25/vivendi-loses-956-million-verdict-to-liberty-media.html
Why let a tyrant dictate the terms of your community over the objections of community members?
We are "professional" because it easier to encourage dialog when people are not afraid. Torvalds believes that he doesn't have to play by the rules because he is some Linux god and the rest of us can suck it. This is only true as long as the rest of us let him.
I really liked this part.
So tolerate abusive, boorish assholes? Why? Just to fit in? Fuck that.
The only two choices are not intolerable asshole and fake nice saccharine pantywaist. He must be surrounded by people calloused to the abuse and too afraid to call it out as what it is. So what you're sitting at home in your bathrobe? Congratulations on being a misanthrope shut in weirdo.
You would pick that up in your normal troubleshooting routine though, swapping the card/cabling, but I see your point.
"Hold on $insert C level executive here, I'm going to break more shit, trust me, it's for our own good" You're fired.
I don't see the practical application of something like this in a physical networked environment. Thinks like this may sound nice for permastudents' theses, but may or may not have a practical use without one hell of a architectural and best practices shift rather than just replacing a failed piece of equipment or rectifying a software issue and closing the ticket?
Windows Steadystate used to do a decent job of this on XP.
What crime? Mr. Anaya is neither a law enforcement officer nor an IRS agent.
There's nothing illegal about money.
Seeing $800,000 is a criminal act? Well shit, there goes my plans for a money bin.
There was no transaction. Mr. Anaya is not a mandatory reporter of a cash transaction to begin with. For all Mr. Anaya knew, the money was withdrawn legally from an institution required to report, why should the onus/burden of enforcing the law fall to a car customizer? They're obviously just smacking him down for not playing nice nice in their ever plodding damn fool idiotic crusade against drugs. I don't think this sentence will stand on appeal. IANAL though.
Yeah, maybe Esteban just had a really lucrative paper route...
It's really none of his business unless he explicitly knew he sold drugs for money, some people just have lots of money, that's not a crime in and of itself. And a reasonable person would probably want to safeguard $800,000 in cash, regardless of source.
Well that didn't take long.
It also looks bad when I can't say what the problem is, the ETA, what we are doing to work around it, etc.
I have a threefold problem with "cloud" storage/computing 1) Lack of control/physical security, up to and including removing my access to my own data due to a violation of some cockamamie TOS or similar agreement. 2) No ability to remedy downtimes, while rare, still do happen. 3) The ability of government agencies to scan my data for whatever they feel like arbitrarily and possibly without due process.
I prefer at the proxy level. Dansguardian/Squid/ClamAV is pretty easy to set up on your distro of choice.
Okay see what you are describing are best practices, which completely ignores the bad practices that organizations actually.......practice. They do bother, since it doesn't cost them a damn thing to get an invalid address bounceback to an address that isn't theirs. If you shotgun out enough messages about your 30 dollar dick pills and 1 percent of people buy them, congratulations, you've just made money.
I'd actually love to see a citation on this, I could google it but maybe you have an article handy. I generally err on the side of brute force or social engineering rather than out and out "hack" or system compromise.
It could very well have just been guessed, the spammers' mail servers are more than likely more than capable of shotgun blasting millions of messages to $randomstring@domain.com in less time than you'd think, and if you change the replyto address, you don't even get the bouncebacks.