I fail to understand the purpose of this law.
If you don't fufill your contract with your provider, they generally have early termination fees and such in their contracts, why do they need the feds to enforce something that doesn't need to be enforced.?
Not really see what they actually did was just literally publish the list, they didn't incite anyone to violence.
I'm not entirely sure I agree with the release of the list to begin with, for other reasons.
Having tested many, my current vote is for Evolution.
Mostly because it can do RPC over HTTPs and talk to Exchange 2003 and later email servers.
Which is kind of a big deal.
For some dumbass reason I thought it meant the Windows 8 store.
I don't know maybe the people who wanted the game already bought it on those other platforms?
It's too new/not enough install base?
Making sensationalist so so brave statement bashing Microsoft will probably bring this person in more money.
Maybe no one wanted to buy it based on its own merits?
Why blame the platform?
So weird.
I thought it was free as in speech, not free as in beer?
It sounds like people want their special little thing to not get too popular and to not let people make money off of it.
I don't see much wrong with what Red Hat/Fedora and Ubuntu do.
What's wrong with charging money to support an enterprise level product?
Is that what Stallman and Berens want?
The first amendment has been interpreted by common and case law to not protect you in cases of slander or libel.
If you're arguing for an entirely literal interpretation of the first amendment well then I'm not entirely sure what to tell you.
"Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no"
Most newer IP PBX systems can be programmed to use more than one number, that is, someone calls your desk, you're not there, it tries your cell phone, you're not there, it sends you an IM, etc.
I think the true answer is "it depends on the nature of your job".
I feel this if then statement is oversimplified.
The answer is probably external factors making the competitive wage for the jobs remain flat in a recession economy.
But that's not sensational enough for/. is it?
Perhaps if we got Rob Enderle to declare something dead, that'll get a shitload of clicks.
Slashdot Mirror
I fail to understand the purpose of this law. If you don't fufill your contract with your provider, they generally have early termination fees and such in their contracts, why do they need the feds to enforce something that doesn't need to be enforced.?
Someone has to say it, may as well be me. What is this MSN?
Probably a dozen.
http://www.xbmchub.com/blog/2012/08/13/parental-control-for-xbmc-addons/
Well that's a whole other discussion, 120 similarly configured access points is worse, IMHO.
This problem has been solved already, it's called WDS. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_distribution_system
Well it's a lazy journalistic crutch and needs to be mocked at every opportunity.
Came here to post this.
A pool. A list of gun owners. Same thing!
Not really see what they actually did was just literally publish the list, they didn't incite anyone to violence. I'm not entirely sure I agree with the release of the list to begin with, for other reasons.
An AC calling someone a pussy. You're doing god's trolling work son.
Having tested many, my current vote is for Evolution. Mostly because it can do RPC over HTTPs and talk to Exchange 2003 and later email servers. Which is kind of a big deal.
For some dumbass reason I thought it meant the Windows 8 store. I don't know maybe the people who wanted the game already bought it on those other platforms? It's too new/not enough install base?
Clearly M dollarsign is to blame. Clearly. Maybe people don't want to play a mobile game on a desktop. Maybe lots of things.
Making sensationalist so so brave statement bashing Microsoft will probably bring this person in more money. Maybe no one wanted to buy it based on its own merits? Why blame the platform? So weird.
I thought it was free as in speech, not free as in beer? It sounds like people want their special little thing to not get too popular and to not let people make money off of it. I don't see much wrong with what Red Hat/Fedora and Ubuntu do. What's wrong with charging money to support an enterprise level product? Is that what Stallman and Berens want?
Calm down I've already been told. I was wrong on the internet.
Well cool, it still hasn't been found to apply to slander/defamation/libel cases.
The first amendment has been interpreted by common and case law to not protect you in cases of slander or libel. If you're arguing for an entirely literal interpretation of the first amendment well then I'm not entirely sure what to tell you.
Congress didn't make the laws, the individual states did. Womp womp.
Correct, it has to both be false and malicious.
Not our problem.
Doesn't apply to defamation/slander.
"Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no" Most newer IP PBX systems can be programmed to use more than one number, that is, someone calls your desk, you're not there, it tries your cell phone, you're not there, it sends you an IM, etc. I think the true answer is "it depends on the nature of your job".
I feel this if then statement is oversimplified. The answer is probably external factors making the competitive wage for the jobs remain flat in a recession economy. But that's not sensational enough for /. is it?
Perhaps if we got Rob Enderle to declare something dead, that'll get a shitload of clicks.