so did you, i ment to say their, as in a group of people, not there as in a place, i am a math/sci person, not a brown-nosing english major, it is not a big deal..
you obviously didn't even read the article so your whole post is irrelevent, the higgs was NOT found, thats what the article is about, you would have known that if you read it, and since you made up that part i also doubt your credability for the rest of your post..
how in the hell fo you get two numerical(otherwise the first 4 expressions wouldn't work) expressions to equal true - or false, you are a moron, let alone the fact you right it >= and not =>
lol..i guess i should have added 'except this statment'..lol..i use to think everything was possible, but now that i am no longer 10(that does not mean i am 11=), i think the opposite
are you retarded..the lep was shtdown because the experiment was finished, they cannot afford to leave that running while they spend the year it takes to anylize the data from a single reaction, and by all but one of the people in that article it was proven, and that one said you just have to add another 15GeV and when not found he would agree, every theory is wrong, it just takes its time to get there..
damned moronic treehugger, the cars wouldn't be disposed of for at least 10-20 years, and the chemicals, the very few that would not be disposed of properly, would take another 30 years to get into the atmosphere, and those are only the parts that can actually get up there in the first place, after all it is in solid form..so like i said..damned moronic treehugger
what if you don't want the extra heat and it would be better served as electricity, in the summer my 2 pcs heat my room up to the point that i have to go into the basement during the day to avoid the heat upstairs, and what about server farms, imagine the savings not having to pay for a/c...
umm..you meen excluding the power to send and receive data from input and output devices such as the minitor, speakers, keyboard, mouse, printer, etc; or do you just plan on defing the conservation of energy without creating a new big-bang?
ummm..no offence, but you are a moron, these generate electricity from heat, the heat death of the universe is when it expands so far there is little energy left, these would be pretty damned usless...
even though that ancient laptop i have burns my lap when i use it as the name implys(and i am sure newer ones are more effcient), i don't think it passws maybee 150 degrees ferinheit, let alone 200 degrees C
heh...it is all just a mutatiion of the first few dna strands, and from what i have read the strands don't go away from generation to generation, so there IS a way that cells succesfully clone dna strands, we just can't do it yet. and now that i think about it..does this meen bringing back dead realatives, even cavemen from thousands of years ago?
Slashdot Mirror
so did you, i ment to say their, as in a group of people, not there as in a place, i am a math/sci person, not a brown-nosing english major, it is not a big deal..
you obviously didn't even read the article so your whole post is irrelevent, the higgs was NOT found, thats what the article is about, you would have known that if you read it, and since you made up that part i also doubt your credability for the rest of your post..
how in the hell fo you get two numerical(otherwise the first 4 expressions wouldn't work) expressions to equal true - or false, you are a moron, let alone the fact you right it >= and not =>
most are red, at least the ripe ones.
lol..i guess i should have added 'except this statment'..lol..i use to think everything was possible, but now that i am no longer 10(that does not mean i am 11=), i think the opposite
am i suppose to just not respond to these ppl, tell me for future ref..but for now:
they are red moron..
are you retarded..the lep was shtdown because the experiment was finished, they cannot afford to leave that running while they spend the year it takes to anylize the data from a single reaction, and by all but one of the people in that article it was proven, and that one said you just have to add another 15GeV and when not found he would agree, every theory is wrong, it just takes its time to get there..
no, their both wrong, but science is closer, and it will get infinitly close, just never get there, whereas the bible is an infinity away..
god damnit!
that was not offtopic, this treehugger posts a completly incomitent post and i state it, so you giv me a fucking -1!!
everything is proven wrong at some point in time(heh..some point in an imaganary plain..), it just came sooner for this.
i like this troll, he dosn't just post the annoyingly gross stuff, he also makes up some funny shit
damned moronic treehugger, the cars wouldn't be disposed of for at least 10-20 years, and the chemicals, the very few that would not be disposed of properly, would take another 30 years to get into the atmosphere, and those are only the parts that can actually get up there in the first place, after all it is in solid form..so like i said..damned moronic treehugger
just out of curiosity..how in the hell is this considered insightful??
what if you don't want the extra heat and it would be better served as electricity, in the summer my 2 pcs heat my room up to the point that i have to go into the basement during the day to avoid the heat upstairs, and what about server farms, imagine the savings not having to pay for a/c...
umm..you meen excluding the power to send and receive data from input and output devices such as the minitor, speakers, keyboard, mouse, printer, etc; or do you just plan on defing the conservation of energy without creating a new big-bang?
and just how old are you...8?
only a -1 for this retard, send him back to the promate testing room and it would be better(the special ed room)
ummm..no offence, but you are a moron, these generate electricity from heat, the heat death of the universe is when it expands so far there is little energy left, these would be pretty damned usless...
even though that ancient laptop i have burns my lap when i use it as the name implys(and i am sure newer ones are more effcient), i don't think it passws maybee 150 degrees ferinheit, let alone 200 degrees C
they have had those for awhile now, just replace all your transistors with vacum tubes and you are set..lol
evr think that the heat would not be at 200+ degrees C at the top of a smokestake treehugger?
well like you said it wouldn't be cool, but not just damage to the brain, it also wouldn't be cool:)
i read some of these replys, no1 is addressing the obvious issue that these could replace heat-sinks, and not be wasted in cars..lol
anyone else think it is a litle cruel to keep slashdotting this site?
heh...it is all just a mutatiion of the first few dna strands, and from what i have read the strands don't go away from generation to generation, so there IS a way that cells succesfully clone dna strands, we just can't do it yet. and now that i think about it..does this meen bringing back dead realatives, even cavemen from thousands of years ago?