Slashdot Mirror


User: vuke69

vuke69's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
90
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 90

  1. Re:Came for the liberal circle jerk... on From MIT Inventor To Tea Party Leader · · Score: 1

    I'll gladly demonize those that trample on the constitution they swore to uphold, liberal and conservative alike. They're equally guilty.

  2. Re:Came for the liberal circle jerk... on From MIT Inventor To Tea Party Leader · · Score: 1

    That tends to happen with age and real-world experience. I actually started off from the other direction. Was a Republican, realized they just a full of shit as the Democrats, and became a Libertarian (when I also realized that's what I really was the whole time). I have no love for the Tea Party, but sympathy for some of their arguments.

  3. Re:Came for the liberal circle jerk... on From MIT Inventor To Tea Party Leader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Echo chambers often look like agreement to those with a distorted worldview. Do you self-identify as a whiny liberal?

  4. Came for the liberal circle jerk... on From MIT Inventor To Tea Party Leader · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...wasn't disappointed.

  5. Have an SLA? on Ask Slashdot: Holding ISPs Accountable For Contracted DSL Bandwidth · · Score: 2

    Have an SLA? ...I didn't think so. You're SOL.

  6. Draft Communications Bill??? on More Plans For UK Internet Snooping Bill Revealed In Queen's Speech · · Score: 2

    More like Daft Communications Bill.

  7. Re:I want a larger Kindle Fire on Will Tablet Price War Mean a Larger Amazon Tablet? · · Score: 1

    Is there an echo in here?

  8. Re:So says the religious guy. on Santorum Calls Democrats 'Anti-Science' · · Score: 1

    Funny thing is, democrats are traditionally the pro-war party.

  9. Re:So says the religious guy. on Santorum Calls Democrats 'Anti-Science' · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7Q8UvJ1wvk

    Science funding goes up under republicans, and down under Democrats.

  10. Re:Great !! 123 more jobs, on BASF Moves GM Plant Research From Europe To US · · Score: 1

    Enviropig

    Ok, now you're just fucking with us...

    googles enviropig... I'll be damned!

  11. Re:More importantly, on Radioactive Concrete From Fukushima Found In New Construction · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your personal experience is but a single data point...

  12. Re:Answer, in brief: on Can NASA Warm Cold Fusion? · · Score: 1

    The unit is defined as coulombs per second. But you always have to divide by time to convert between power and energy units. If you think amps have anything to do with time, you don't understand them.

    This is identical to the relationship between velocity (power) and distance traveled (energy). Velocity is an instantaneous measurement, and has nothing to do with time; yet is measured in meters per second.

  13. Re:Answer, in brief: on Can NASA Warm Cold Fusion? · · Score: 1

    Say for example, you have a car battery rated as 500W

    False premise. Batteries are not rated in W, they are rated in Wh. They have a roughly fixed amount of stored potential energy.

    This means the battery can sustain 500W of power over a very short period of time.

    Also false. Batteries are also rated in amps, for the safe amount that can be drawn off them. Given the battery voltage you can obviously convert that to watts, but it still doesn't mean what you think it does. That would be how much it can sustain until the battery has gone flat, not a hypothetical "very short period of time."

    Generators, solar cells, etc.; are rated in W, because they have roughly a fixed amount of power they can generate continuously. As such, this guy's (probably imaginary) reactor would also be rated in W. You could rate the fuel in joules or kWh, much like you could rate a barrel of diesel fuel in the same manner.

  14. Re:Answer, in brief: on Can NASA Warm Cold Fusion? · · Score: 2

    A joule is the total energy, the amount of work done. Divide that by seconds, and you get Watts, which is an instantaneous measurement, and has NO TIME COMPONENT!

    W=V*A
    Volts have nothing to do with time. Amps have nothing to do with time. WHY THE FUCK would watts have anything to do with time?

    Yes, PLEASE, retake primary school physics. Perhaps then you would not be so persistent at proving to the world how poorly you understand simple concepts.

  15. Re:Answer, in brief: on Can NASA Warm Cold Fusion? · · Score: 1

    No, you are incorrect.

  16. Re:100 billion likely way too low on Astronomers Estimate Milky Way May Have 100 Billion Alien Worlds · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but besides THAT, it sounds like a good idea!

  17. Re:I'll jump in on Astronomers Estimate Milky Way May Have 100 Billion Alien Worlds · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean a hyperspace bypass?

  18. Re:Sweet on Astronomers Estimate Milky Way May Have 100 Billion Alien Worlds · · Score: 2

    So still zero?

  19. Re:Ha - "aloof" on IT Managers Are Aloof Says Psychologist and Your Co-Workers · · Score: 2

    Australia

  20. Re:Career on Ask Slashdot: Handing Over Personal Work Without Compensation? · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must be a fry cook.

  21. Re:just buy it separate on Verizon's Galaxy Nexus To Launch Tomorrow · · Score: 2

    They still do that. You save $20/mo on individual plans and $40/mo on family plans if you bring your own phone.

  22. Re:Take it with a grain of salt... on New Skeleton Finds May Revamp History of Human Evolution · · Score: 1

    A loop where time becomes.

  23. Re:what? on Review: Cowboys & Aliens · · Score: 1

    Schrödinger's Han Solo?

    Or would that be Han Duo?

  24. Re:Save important pet lives...? on San Francisco Considers Ban On All Pet Sales · · Score: 1

    My rocks like it when I polish them.

  25. Re:You have..... on Just Months After Jeopardy!, Watson Wows Doctors · · Score: 1

    Except for when it is, then no one expects it.