Dunno about you, but this is not how my mind works. I honor or ignore stop signs depending on the present conditions (e.g. empty roads at night, etc). How's that weak?
The recognition of the stop sign is weak. You don't go: "hey, that's a red octagonal sign with the word "STOP" in it, I think that's a stop sign", you just automatically recognize is. In your case, the recognition is then tied to a more complex decision mechanism.
No, the green light automatically overrules the stop sign. It's just a more complicated pattern.
Of course, as the situation becomes more complicated, for instance, a fallen tree is blocking the road, then you become aware of the situation, and start thinking about what happened, and making a plan on how to proceed.
Most people will surely not stop after a few trips and will instead learn that that one specific instruction is false. That part we do not teach our AIs which makes them weak. The AI will fall for the prank every time
Correct, but that's because we haven't put a lot of effort in the AI to learn from its mistakes. That would probably required a different design of the network, with feedback, instead of simple layering from image pixels to classification output.
And we have even less of an idea what consciousness is. According to the current scientific state-of-the-art, there is no physical mechanism for consciousness, yet it clearly exists. Of course, said AI fanatics will say nonsense like...
If you have no idea what it is, how would you know that it is nonsense ?
there is no physical mechanism for consciousness
If there's no physical mechanism, how/why did it evolve ?
A lot of human image processing is also "weak", just a bit more advanced. When you're driving, and you see a stop sign, you don't really think about it, or "understand" in a deeper sense. You just automatically stop.
there's a snowball's chance in hell the ISP is going to pay your legal fees
They make money off of this service, so it's in their interest to defend their customers, otherwise nobody will use it after the first mishap. Besides, it will be an easy case for them, because all they have to do is grab the login credentials, and hand them the name and address of the real abuser.
The guest will get his own IP address, completely separate from the rest of the router, and the ISP will log the IP address together with the guest credentials. The router location is irrelevant.
4G is now good enough that it's just not worth the hassle of connecting to unreliable WiFi hotspots, and losing connection every time you go out of range. Do they even support seamless connection handover as you walk down the street ?
The water that went into the pit or tank decades ago is coming out tomorrow too. And the atmosphere is constantly in motion. The air mass that's over a desert today will be over the ocean next week, and the other way around.
If you're lucky that the vertically video wasn't letterboxed already, so that watching it on a vertical screen results in letterboxing on all 4 sides. I saw that the other day. Good thing I'm not neurotic.
Their incentive is perks from the publisher.
...to show me just those that contain pictures of an arbitrary object.
You don't need very advanced AI to show pictures of arbitrary objects, though.
No, because here in the West we kept our guns.
In Europe, the Islamists have more guns than the natives.
I remember buying RAM for $7 per kilobyte.
despite about half a century of intense research.
For the first 40 years, we didn't have fast enough hardware. So, really, we've just started, and progress is pretty quick these days.
Dunno about you, but this is not how my mind works. I honor or ignore stop signs depending on the present conditions (e.g. empty roads at night, etc). How's that weak?
The recognition of the stop sign is weak. You don't go: "hey, that's a red octagonal sign with the word "STOP" in it, I think that's a stop sign", you just automatically recognize is. In your case, the recognition is then tied to a more complex decision mechanism.
No, the green light automatically overrules the stop sign. It's just a more complicated pattern.
Of course, as the situation becomes more complicated, for instance, a fallen tree is blocking the road, then you become aware of the situation, and start thinking about what happened, and making a plan on how to proceed.
AIs have never surpassed human performance (of course, you always need to compare to a human expert)
You must not have heard about AlphaGo.
Most people will surely not stop after a few trips and will instead learn that that one specific instruction is false. That part we do not teach our AIs which makes them weak. The AI will fall for the prank every time
Correct, but that's because we haven't put a lot of effort in the AI to learn from its mistakes. That would probably required a different design of the network, with feedback, instead of simple layering from image pixels to classification output.
And we have even less of an idea what consciousness is. According to the current scientific state-of-the-art, there is no physical mechanism for consciousness, yet it clearly exists. Of course, said AI fanatics will say nonsense like ...
If you have no idea what it is, how would you know that it is nonsense ?
there is no physical mechanism for consciousness
If there's no physical mechanism, how/why did it evolve ?
A lot of human image processing is also "weak", just a bit more advanced. When you're driving, and you see a stop sign, you don't really think about it, or "understand" in a deeper sense. You just automatically stop.
Surely, you mean this one:
https://www.xkcd.com/1807/
there's a snowball's chance in hell the ISP is going to pay your legal fees
They make money off of this service, so it's in their interest to defend their customers, otherwise nobody will use it after the first mishap. Besides, it will be an easy case for them, because all they have to do is grab the login credentials, and hand them the name and address of the real abuser.
The guest will get his own IP address, completely separate from the rest of the router, and the ISP will log the IP address together with the guest credentials. The router location is irrelevant.
Just like they can on private networks.
4G costs data which translates to money. Wifi doesn't.
I pay $15 for 10GB/month, and I typically only use around 5-6GB of that, so saving data does not save money.
The ISP knows who's using the connection, so that should be fairly easy.
4G is now good enough that it's just not worth the hassle of connecting to unreliable WiFi hotspots, and losing connection every time you go out of range. Do they even support seamless connection handover as you walk down the street ?
I mean if drinking distilled water is bad for you, long term, without adding the minerals that your body needs, that's not really a good solution
There are minerals in the food.
So, the UN breaks down "desert" into "desert, arid, grassland and rangeland".
So, when someone says "desert" are they talking about LHS or RHS of the equation ?
The water that went into the pit or tank decades ago is coming out tomorrow too. And the atmosphere is constantly in motion. The air mass that's over a desert today will be over the ocean next week, and the other way around.
If you're lucky that the vertically video wasn't letterboxed already, so that watching it on a vertical screen results in letterboxing on all 4 sides. I saw that the other day. Good thing I'm not neurotic.
Of course there are going to be MORE incarcerated blacks if they are being unfairly incarcerated MORE often.
Nice story. Now all you have to do is prove the bit where most of the black people have been incarcerated unfairly.
Crime causes poverty, not the other way around.
That explains the 19 old kids I see driving around in a BMW convertible.
Removing humidity from the air might even enhance that.
Nearly all that water will go back to the air in the next day as you sweat/pee it back out, so it wouldn't matter.