Slashdot Mirror


New Solar-Powered Device Can Pull Water Straight From the Desert Air (sciencemag.org)

sciencehabit quotes a report from Science Magazine: You can't squeeze blood from a stone, but wringing water from the desert sky is now possible, thanks to a new spongelike device that uses sunlight to suck water vapor from air, even in low humidity. The device can produce nearly 3 liters of water per day, and researchers say future versions will be even better. That means homes in the driest parts of the world could soon have a solar-powered appliance capable of delivering all the water they need, offering relief to billions of people. To find an all-purpose solution, researchers led by Omar Yaghi, a chemist at the University of California, Berkeley, turned to a family of crystalline powders called metal organic frameworks, or MOFs. Yaghi developed the first MOFs -- porous crystals that form continuous 3D networks -- more than 20 years ago. The networks assemble in a Tinkertoy-like fashion from metal atoms that act as the hubs and sticklike organic compounds that link the hubs together. By choosing different metals and organics, chemists can dial in the properties of each MOF, controlling what gases bind to them, and how strongly they hold on. The system Wang and her students designed consists of a kilogram of dust-sized MOF crystals pressed into a thin sheet of porous copper metal. That sheet is placed between a solar absorber and a condenser plate and positioned inside a chamber. At night the chamber is opened, allowing ambient air to diffuse through the porous MOF and water molecules to stick to its interior surfaces, gathering in groups of eight to form tiny cubic droplets. In the morning, the chamber is closed, and sunlight entering through a window on top of the device then heats up the MOF, which liberates the water droplets and drives them -- as vapor -- toward the cooler condenser. The temperature difference, as well as the high humidity inside the chamber, causes the vapor to condense as liquid water, which drips into a collector. The findings were published in the journal Science.

202 comments

  1. Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds a bit like a windtrap. Can sietchs and spice-harvesting be far off?

    1. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If nothing else, it has the advantage over vaporators in that Imperial stormtroopers won't kill your family.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're already using it on Tatooine.

    3. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But are they easier to maintain? Can you use a droid that's worked with binary loadlifters like you can with vaporators, or do you need a specialized droid? Those can get expensive out in the desert.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      The worry to me is that this will attract sand worms.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Daemonik · · Score: 2

      Who needs a droid? Now put on your stillsuit and get out to the condensers.

    6. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you walk without rhythm, you won't attract the worm.

    7. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So happy this was the first comment. No need to read any further.

    8. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you walk without rhythm, you won't attract the worm.

      White privilege!

    9. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >> Imperial stormtroopers won't kill your family

      Said no one actually living in the Middle East in 2017.

    10. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      >> Imperial stormtroopers won't kill your family

      Said no one actually living in the Middle East in 2017.

      True enough, I guess. So, +1 Informative, -1 Whoosh?

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    11. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by CaptnCrud · · Score: 1

      The flesh surrenders itself, he thought. Eternity takes back its own. Our bodies stirred these waters briefly, danced with a certain intoxication before the love of life and self, dealt with a few strange ideas, then submitted to the instruments of Time. What can we say of this? I occurred. I am not . . . yet, I occurred.

      Paul Muad'Dib Atreides

    12. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by zlives · · Score: 1

      you clearly missed the Butlerian jihad history class.

    13. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by zlives · · Score: 1

      LOL

    14. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by zlives · · Score: 1

      well... as long as the sleeper can stay asleep.

    15. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Yes, but which empire and whose Storm?

    16. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because it's true.

    17. Re: Can we use this device on Arrakis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said someone who has no sense of humor

    18. Re:Can we use this device on Arrakis? by syntotic · · Score: 1

      I want one, sounds perfect to walk New York City streets.

  2. Some other projects by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re: Some other projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking this thing is for when you don't have Ray Mears to hand.

    2. Re:Some other projects by DrXym · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking of as I read the summary too.

    3. Re:Some other projects by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      Except this apparently works in areas that don't get fog. The concept is kinda similar though.

  3. A few questions by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    I gave TFA a cursory glance only, so sorry if ghis has been answered.

    How large is this thing?
    And I assume the water it produces is akin to distilled water. Isn't that bad to drink?

    1. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes no, it is bad if you dont have a source of salts.

      Thats why the sami here drinks coffe with salt in it. When they are going in the moantins and only get water from snow you ad salt the same applies here

    2. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recycle the salts from your pee and sweat. Or extract it from the ground/sand/dirt (use the liquid water and a different gadget.

    3. Re: A few questions by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      It's a prototype and TFA says it only has 1kg of material so it would be fairly small. This thing is producing a lot of water for 1kg.

    4. Re: A few questions by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      It's a prototype and TFA says it only has 1kg of material so it would be fairly small. This thing is producing a lot of water for 1kg.

      It also say 'spread in to a thin sheet'. So it would be huge. And why do you consider it a 'lot of water' for 1kg?

    5. Re: A few questions by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      3 liters per kilo of material in low humidity conditions seems like a lot.

    6. Re: A few questions by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      When they are going in the moantins and only get water from snow you ad salt the same applies here

      That's why you should only eat the yellow snow.

    7. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real issue is that it pulls humidity. If you have enough humidity to make this work than you probably have water near you too. The places where this is needed will have a really hard time getting much value from it.

    8. Re:A few questions by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > I assume the water it produces is akin to distilled water. Isn't that bad to drink?

      Yes. A lot of the human digestive tract works by osmosis. Putting distilled water through it means it's going to reverse, and rather than your body absorbing a lot of important things, it's going to be dumping them - presumably into your stool.

      I don't imagine hardening water to healthy levels will be all that difficult... the question is, can you make it inexpensive, robust, and foolproof enough for the type of applications this device (if it works and is practical) would see.

      Continual consumption of distilled water is bad for your heart, nervous system, and immune system - but it takes fair while, and there are other ways to get minerals and other things you might normally get from water... mainly *eating* them. Still, it would be an additional concern that you otherwise wouldn't even have to think about.

    9. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the first Google search result: "The relative humidity in the Sahara Desert is 25%"

      Along with this result: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/water-vapor-air-d_854.html - suggests that there is actually MORE TOTAL WATER in the air over the Sahara Desert than there is in the air in most of the continental US at any time of the year.

    10. Re:A few questions by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2

      I remember reading about how the Sauds and other countries in that region take relatively deionized water that was distilled or from their desalination plants, and add the needed trace amounts of minerals fo it, so it would be suitable and healthy for drinking.

      If distilled water becomes common, I can see a company like Nuun making fizzy tablets which dissolve in water to give the needed minerals, and perhaps some useful vitamins as well.

    11. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah - but is any of that worse than dying of thirst?

    12. Re: A few questions by zieroh · · Score: 1

      The TFA says it works in low humidity, such as that found in arid regions.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    13. Re: A few questions by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

      I am more worried about the idea that "billions of people" are living in uninhabitable areas!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    14. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then a glass of water costs you over a buck to add a tablet with a pennies worth of nutrients to it...

    15. Re:A few questions by skids · · Score: 1

      Well, if you only drink gatorade you made from it, it should be fine... well except for the calcium. I heard distilled water can be hard on your teeth for lack of it.

    16. Re:A few questions by SEE · · Score: 1

      Aquifers under deserts tend to have rather saline groundwater, to the point the issue is often reducing the salt content enough to be potable. A supply of distilled water would be quite easy to handle; you just blend it with the water you're already drawing from wells.

    17. Re:A few questions by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Better yet, do they have a working, of sorts, prototype?

    18. Re: A few questions by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      "I dreamed I was an Eskimo..."

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    19. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean 3 kilo per kilo

    20. Re:A few questions by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      shipping salt tablets (or whatever) is vastly easier than shipping water.

    21. Re:A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one in the picture seems to be about twice the size of a serious CPU heatsink. The article says it can pull in 2.8 liters (it was updated) of water per kilogram of material. The material is not pure zirconium but a mix of that plus some kind of organic compound, so I don't exactly how large it'd be, but 1kg of pure zirconium is 154 cubic centimeters of material, which sounds like a lot to U.S folks until you convert to Imperial, then its 0.65 cups, barely more than half, and weighs about 2.2lbs.

      So yeah, its probably not gonna be a very large device at full scale, certainly on par with the vaporators from Star Wars to include several sheets.

      materials information:
      zirconium weighs 6.51 grams per cc.

    22. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't say at what humidity it can extract 3 liters.
      They only said it can work in low humidity conditions, and that it can extract (up to) 3 liters.
      To me that means that at low humidity you will get a couple of drops and at 99% humidity you might get 3 l.

    23. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait a couple of decades, and we'll get there.

    24. Re: A few questions by slashrio · · Score: 1

      The places where this is needed will have a really hard time getting much value from it.

      Actually it has been tweaked to work in the dessert where relative humidity is about 21%.
      I don't know whether or not you consider this a 'place where this is needed', but I do.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    25. Re:A few questions by slashrio · · Score: 1

      Knowing the twisted minds of marketing managers they will only put the cheapest of the cheapest useless vitamins in it.
      They won't spend as much, and they can claim it's healthy.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    26. Re:A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a pile of utter BULLSHIT. Why not check actual levels of water composition and what the fuck osmosis is. Then perhaps look at the contents of blood, or what a god dam membrane is. Like just a plain one on any cell. Also consider that you also EAT FUCKING FOOD you dumb shit.

    27. Re: A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is rubbish. The body achieves homeostasis regardless of what we add to it. Food generally gives u everything u need. It's only in rare cases you'd need added minerals.

    28. Re:A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of that is true at all. Distillation is great. Do you sell reverse-osmosis systems or something?

  4. Seeing is believing by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There have been a few, let's say, shady promises about extracting water from air, mostly coupled with crowdfunding campaigns (gee, why could that be?). Those that actually delivered a product were mostly ridiculous, provided you were not one of those duped into backing it. Then it was more a reason for anger and disappointment.

    Most actually never delivered. Which reminds me, wasn't Fontus due to deliver right now in April? Any backers here, did they actually deliver? Because, let's put it careful, I'd really, really love to see that!

    So don't get me wrong when I don't hold my breath. I have been promised easy water from thin air before. And what has been delivered so far, if anything, was ridiculous. Either it didn't work, didn't scale past proof-of-concept scale or only worked if the humidity was high enough that rain was more the rule than the exception, rendering a system that extracts water from the air redundant: A bucket would do.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The crowdfunded examples all had glaring issues that they needed to break the laws of physics to work as stated, had no working prototype, and made excessive claims

      This has the advantage of not breaking any laws of physics, having a working prototype, and making claims that are reasonable

      3 liters of water in 12 hours is not excessive for either humid air or a lot of energy, all they have done is use a new (but already tried method) of doing this, the airflow is low, and the energy usage looks reasonable

      It is likely to be bulky and expensive, but so are all prototypes ...

    2. Re:Seeing is believing by swb · · Score: 1

      Whether it's worthwhile seems to come down to something like how many square meters of collector does it take to create 300 liters of water per day and is it all done with just solar power or does it require extra inputs and how much does it cost.

    3. Re:Seeing is believing by sheramil · · Score: 1

      and something like if there is 300 liters of water present in the air to begin with.

    4. Re: Seeing is believing by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      I have no idea where you're getting 300L a day. A human only needs around 1l of water a day to survive.

    5. Re: Seeing is believing by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      A human only needs around 1l of water a day to survive.

      In the desert ?

    6. Re:Seeing is believing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Let's put it that way: I know how much water my air condition condenses in 12 hours. Yes, 2-3 liters in half a day is very possible. In a sweltering atmosphere with a humidity that reaches the 80% easily, 100F and an air condition with 8000 btu.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re: Seeing is believing by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      A liter a day is your "invisible" water loss, due to respiration and perspiration. If it's not too hot and you're sweating like a pig.

      Urine accounts for 1.5 - 2.5 liters a day, depending on circumstances. If you're dehydrated and your body notices it should be conserving fluids, you're closer to 1.5, but that's not good for your kidneys if carried on for too long.

      So we're closer to 2-3 liters a day that you need to survive. And your didn't brush your teeth, wash yourself or cook food yet.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with ya. I've been reading about vaporware on /. for 2 decades now. I think we are finally done with "cold fusion"

    9. Re:Seeing is believing by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Plus your airconditioner doesn't run on solar power.

    10. Re:Seeing is believing by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      There have been a few, let's say, shady promises about extracting water from air, mostly coupled with crowdfunding campaigns (gee, why could that be?).

      And how. Crowdfunding is a great way to grab some money from the Youtube perpetual motion gang.

      The thing that is odd is that this paltry 3 liters of water with it's expensive collection materials pales in comparison with this system that will extract 42 liters per day, http://www.treehugger.com/clea... , uses wind power, and only costs 134 dollars.

      These people are pikers compared to the manufacturer of that fine bit of kit.

      But there are those nasty thermodynamic laws and the enthalpy of vaporization stuff going on that tend to bitchslap these devices and their supporters.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:Seeing is believing by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      IT can, and quite easily. 1000 watts of solar is not that hard to achieve

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re: Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you dont know much. That information is horribly inaccurate. 1L a day is hwat you respirate out while laying in bed. do anything else ANYTHING. and it goes up rapidly.

      Laying in bed in 102 heat of the desert and you are at 2L already.

    13. Re:Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arid locations have an abundance of Sun Light, and Heat. Using both would easily generate enough energy for ones requirements. One could use this device in California's San Joaquin valley. Farmers there would easily be open to such technologies.

    14. Re:Seeing is believing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Since I don't know just how good the lawyers of those Vaporware producers are, I will refrain from commenting on the veracity of that claim. I will point out, though, that with a relative humidity of 100% at 25C you can squeeze 0.01ml of water from a liter of air. Or 0.00001 liters per liter of air. So it's easy to see that you'd have to move and FULL dehumidify (which is impossible, but let's fake it, I mean, if they can, why shouldn't we...) over 4 MILLION liters of air for those 42 liters of water. And we're talking about air that is close to condensing because it's so saturated with water. Not dry-as-a-fart desert air.

      To give you an idea: 42 million liters is close to a thousand tank trucks.

      And we didn't even touch on the problem of that "anchor" and how quickly it heats up yet...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Seeing is believing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It could, technically. The solar panels to do so would probably black out the Sahara, but technically...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re: Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much does a 1kw solar solution cost in the US now? Is it still around $1,500?

      At that price I'll just buy my water the regular way.

    17. Re:Seeing is believing by peragrin · · Score: 2

      Not really a window airconditioner running on a 15 amp(generally 12 amp) and 120 volts has a max 1200watt draw.

      1000w of solar panels is roughly the same size as a typical mid sized window in a home. so 1x2 meters or 3x 6 foot.

      5000w can power something like 60-90% of a given home depending on if it is gas or electric heat gas or electric hot water and size of air conditioner. That is why solar panels are popping up around the world on houses. for $20-$30k you can get basically free electricity. at $100 a month ($1200 a year that pays for itself in the life of the panels) faster if your government gives rebates and subsidies.

      Bonus the more places that have solar grid tie ins the more stable to overall grid will be.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    18. Re: Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WHO says that 20L / person / day is bare survival level.
      That includes all uses, including growing / raising food.

      A moderate standard of living requires about 60-70 Liters per person, per day. That provides enough for food, hygiene, cooking, etc.

      Anonymous Because I'm Lazy

    19. Re:Seeing is believing by Jhon · · Score: 1

      " 1000 watts of solar is not that hard to achieve"

      neither is 10,000. You just need a lot of surface area.

      1000 is about 5.5 square meters -- and that will produce about enough water for 1 person per day -- to drink -- never mind tending to food (livestock or crops). Unless we're planning on building a subterranean society of Morlocks living under miles of solar panels I don't think we're at the point where this is practical for anything more than off-grid outback living or helping out small communities of hunter gatherers who happen to live in deserts.

    20. Re:Seeing is believing by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      You might be able to green the desert with it.

      The area under the solar panels will be shady.

      It does seem like large numbers of these things will effect the microclimate in some way.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    21. Re: Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck buying water in an African desert.

    22. Re:Seeing is believing by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1, Interesting
      A 1,000 W panel is its peak rating. It will give you about 300W average during daylight hours (in the tropics, not North London), so about 150W average over 24 hours.

      Where you live is a lot different to here. Generally, we expect a house to average 4kW (over 24 hours) with no A/C. 5kW will probably only power one A/C in addition to routine loads, and a very small house has a 15kW gas boiler round here.

      Electric heating costs 5 * the price of gas here. Even using an A/C in heating mode will cost you twice what gas would cost you.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    23. Re:Seeing is believing by Enigma2175 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If solar panel lifetime is shorter than 15-20 years like you say, why do solar manufacturers offer warrantees for 25 years or more? For example, here is LG's warranty page for their solar panels, they guarantee that their panels will produce at least 80.2% of their rated output at the end of the 25th year. Panel lifetimes are certainly better than the "few years" that you claim.

      --

      Enigma

    24. Re:Seeing is believing by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I suppose the difference is that those other products were designed by artists, and this one is developed by scientists.
      The artists have no idea about the technical details of how it supposed to work, and try to hire some engineers to do the actual development. When the numbers don't work out, then they go into full bullshit mode, crafting stories to their backers about supplier difficulties or whatnot.

      The scientists are already developing the device and have some prototypes that do things. The claims are large, but Science has a lot more credibility than Kickstarter.

    25. Re:Seeing is believing by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Who said it has to be portable?

    26. Re:Seeing is believing by Falconhell · · Score: 3, Informative

      Im averaging 14kw per day from a 2kw system with micro inverters. Thats averaging around 1kw. Your system must suck bad.

    27. Re:Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG did you even read the comments in the article YOU posted?

      Almost all of them are devoted to explaining how WindSeer is a scam and violates the laws of physics.

      There are entire videos on YouTube devoted to showing how WindSeer is a scam and you shouldn't give them money.

      Please, read the content and fact check your links before posting them.

    28. Re:Seeing is believing by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      for $20-$30k you can get basically free electricity. >

      Whoodathunkit!

    29. Re: Seeing is believing by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      1l a day to survive if you're sitting around in a nice cool environment and not doing much exercise. A lot more than that in the desert and/or if you do any kind of physical labor.

      In the prepper community, the general rule of thumb is to store 5 gallons of water per person per day. That's the bare minimum for drinking needs + food preparation + some (very) basic personal hygiene.

    30. Re: Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck buying water in an African desert.

      Makes you wonder whether this isn't doable with sane politics on the continent. LA gets its water from several hundred miles upstate (setup a century ago) and the Keystone pipeline is set to pump oil over thousands of miles. In Africa you've got a rain forest within range(?) with solar and likely other sources of power to drive pumps. Not going to happen in our lifetimes of course, but more due to politics than technology I'd think.

    31. Re:Seeing is believing by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Let's get that Tansley Effect going.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    32. Re:Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which reminds me, wasn't Fontus due to deliver right now in April? Any backers here, did they actually deliver?

      Most definitively NOT a backer, Thunderfoot has a walkthrough of their last year about a month ago, here: https://youtu.be/wNHcIYyYDhU?t... along with some tests and minor rants.

    33. Re:Seeing is believing by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      OMG did you even read the comments in the article YOU posted?

      Yes I did. I find it hard to imagine that you read my post. Windseer is a scam. This device very likely is as well. At their very best, they are misguided

      There are energy issues involved with trying to pull water out of dry air. A dehumidifier or air conditioner use a lot of energy. A lot of people don't understand that, and are easy marks for scammers.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    34. Re:Seeing is believing by erapert · · Score: 1

      Also, he does some detailed math, but for a different vaporware product, in this one: waterseer busted.

    35. Re:Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, Fontus even received financial support from the Austrian government. Not very surprising, since the country is basically run by retards. Meanwhile, the founder blames manufacturers for his non-delivery, read yourself at https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/fontus-the-self-filling-water-bottles-sport-camping#/updates

      Pretty hilarious.

    36. Re:Seeing is believing by perpenso · · Score: 1

      If solar panel lifetime is shorter than 15-20 years like you say, why do solar manufacturers offer warrantees for 25 years or more?

      A sales trick? Only the original purchaser gets the warranty and they are likely to move before it fails or seriously degrades? Or the poster is using dated technical info, those LG panels might be quite different that what was manufactured a decade or so earlier. A friend considered going solar 10+ years ago and dug into the technical info and it wasn't quite cost effective back then. Today it probably is, but he moved from CA to WA.

    37. Re: Seeing is believing by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      This distance from say the city of Tunis to the rain forest is about the distance from Los Angels to the Atlantic Ocean. Transport over that distance can only be justified if water sells at the destination for as much as oil does -- which it does not, unless you're about the little bottles of premium water that foolish westerners pay absurd prices for.

      Also, it's not insane politics to not wish to be dependent on other countries for water -- it's common sense. Same reason countries subsidize their farmers in order to avoid being dependent on cheaper food imports.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    38. Re:Seeing is believing by slashrio · · Score: 1

      80% humidity can hardly be called a dessert-like region.
      But ok, how much would an air conditioner produce at 20% humidity?

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    39. Re:Seeing is believing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water from air has been around for ages. We call them de-humidifiers.

      This is the one I own. http://www.homedepot.com/p/GE-30-Pint-Dehumidifier-ADEL30LR/203661853?keyword=GE+30-Pint+Dehumidifier

      Lets be nice and say you do NOT want to drink the water of out of it without filtering it first. It snags every bit of dirt that is floating around in the air too.

      It is loud. Most of the crowdfunded ones look like a rip off.

      Thunderf00t puts it better.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPvXnmBIO7o
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDHdIH13FRU
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pen6dBszLgA
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVsqIjAeeXw

      You need a decent amount of water to lower the temp of the air to get the water to condense out of it. The thermodynamics of it just can not be beat by crowdsourcing.

    40. Re: Seeing is believing by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The conversion is awful.

      You're looking at ~1 kWh to generate a half liter of water in optimal (50%+ humidity) conditions - a car battery worth of energy to get a few glasses of water.

      Large solar panels come at ~300-400W but this device needs to work both day and night so you also need to get some extra plus energy storage.

      Even if this device is able to basically match current output rates in a 10% humidity environment which would be a huge feat you're looking at approx 12 large solar panels (a small house install) per liter (not gallon) of water.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  5. Billions of people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

    That means homes in the driest parts of the world could soon have a solar-powered appliance capable of delivering all the water they need, offering relief to billions of people.
    The s indicates plural, that means more than one billion ... actually minimum two.

    Who on earth is so stupid to believe that "a billion" people live in "deserts"?

    Nevertheless a device like this might be useful in all warm/humid areas. I wonder how clean the water will stay over time, as in: can fungi grow inside of the device, can bacteria settle in it, how to keep the water sterile and the aparatus working?

    There where a few other posts about technology like this in the recent years on /.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re: Billions of people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people do live in areas that meet the technical definition of a desert, such as northern and south western Africa, parts of East Africa, the Middle East, Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, parts of India, parts of the former USSR, parts of China, Mongolia, Australia, Southern and Northern America, including New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and parts of California.

    2. Re: Billions of people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And many of those places lack internet access and money to buy those magic beans... I mean solar powered water collection devices.

    3. Re:Billions of people? by rocket+rancher · · Score: 1

      The s indicates plural, that means more than one billion ... actually minimum two.

      Who on earth is so stupid to believe that "a billion" people live in "deserts"?

      Hmmm. I live in a desert in the SW US, the Sonoran desert. I share this land with about 8M of my fellow humans. It is probably the wettest desert on the planet, but it is still, by definition, a desert, with most areas receiving only about 150mm/yr in its bimodal precipitation regime. It is also the smallest desert biome on the planet, covering only about 260,000 square km.

      The generally accepted definition of a desert is less than 250mm of annual precipitation. The UN breaks this down into desert, arid, grassland, and rangeland, and it covers a whopping 61M square km, or 41 percent of the land surface of the planet. According to the same UN report, 35 percent of the planet's population live in areas that meet this definition, which gets us to 2.6 billion people. There's your billions, with an "s," if you are one of those people on earth "stupid" enough to actually do a little research.

    4. Re:Billions of people? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      So, the UN breaks down "desert" into "desert, arid, grassland and rangeland".

      So, when someone says "desert" are they talking about LHS or RHS of the equation ?

    5. Re:Billions of people? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You already broke it down into 3 quite different areas.
      So: there are not 2billion people living in a desert.
      I would be surprised if it is more than 200million (looking ata Arabica and Gobi).

      No idea why you write such a long post when you clearly don't grasp about what you are writing.
      Hint: Grassland and Rangeland are not desserts.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  6. No. by psinet · · Score: 0

    *"The device can produce nearly 3 liters of water per day..."

    *"...homes in the driest parts of the world could soon have a solar-powered appliance capable of delivering all the water they need, offering relief to billions of people."

    Same sentence, yet the statements are not even close to existing in the same galaxy.

    That is not even mentioning that this is less efficient that currently existing systems. Bob help us all.

  7. Stupid idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The physics just don't add up. At desert levels of humidity, this device would have to be a massive energy sucking monster, with huge mass air flow to even produce small amounts of water. This must be a scam of some type.

  8. Yes billions by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Who on earth is so stupid to believe that "a billion" people live in "deserts"?

    How about the United Nations? Strictly speaking it isn't all desert but apparently well north of a billion people live in water stressed parts of the world or areas threatened by desertification.

    Nevertheless a device like this might be useful in all warm/humid areas.

    Maybe. The real question is how much does it cost per unit of water generated. To be useful it would have to generate a rather sizeable amount of water even to just cover drinking and basic cleaning needs.

    1. Re:Yes billions by houghi · · Score: 2

      Another question is how it will effect the enviroment. These places are, as you say, already threatened by desertification. Removing humidity from the air might even enhance that. The little bit of dez that is just enough to keep a few plants alive might be gone.

      Also it will let move more people to thse areas and this increase the impact.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Yes billions by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Removing humidity from the air might even enhance that.

      Nearly all that water will go back to the air in the next day as you sweat/pee it back out, so it wouldn't matter.

    3. Re:Yes billions by njvack · · Score: 2

      Maybe. The real question is how much does it cost per unit of water generated. To be useful it would have to generate a rather sizeable amount of water even to just cover drinking and basic cleaning needs.

      Well, here's the instructions to synthesize MOF-801-P and it doesn't look super complicated. The solar input is used both for heat (to desorb the water in the MOF) and electricity (to condense the vapor), so it probably doesn't need to be a super-high-efficiency panel. The MOF contains zirconium, carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, so it's not like we're dealing with platinum or rare earth elements... so, I dunno. I suspect the system wouldn't be outrageously expensive when produced at volume.

    4. Re:Yes billions by njvack · · Score: 1

      Also, the active cooling for condensation is not needed, according to the article (it makes the process a faster) so you can skip electrical generation altogether by putting your condenser in the shade with a heat sink. So your solar panel can literally be a matte-black sheet of aluminum.

    5. Re:Yes billions by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      I doubt it's quite that simple.. If they're using a sewage system, the water will be effectively 'gone' in a pit or tank. (Sure, it'll get back 'eventually', but that might take decades.) Agree with the previous post that drawing even more moisture from a dry zone may have unknown consequences and ought to be studied before technology like this is deployed.

    6. Re:Yes billions by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      The water that went into the pit or tank decades ago is coming out tomorrow too. And the atmosphere is constantly in motion. The air mass that's over a desert today will be over the ocean next week, and the other way around.

    7. Re:Yes billions by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      Yes, but then why isn't the planet one homogenized climate? Why are there deserts in the first place? If there's an area that already is exceptionally dry, I think it's fair to ask 'what if we draw even more moisture from it?' Sure, in hundreds or thousands or millions of years it'll have balanced out, but we're affecting change on a much bigger scale now. Are you a climate change denier as well?

    8. Re:Yes billions by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Rare earth elements are not rare.
      It is just a name they got, when they were discovered.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  9. Cost per unit of water? by sjbe · · Score: 2

    What is the cost per unit of water generated? It doesn't matter if it works if it is prohibitively expensive per unit of water generated. If the economics of it don't make sense it will never be used at scale.

    1. Re:Cost per unit of water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up, you know nothing and your question is as retarded as you are.

      No one likes you, and your mom wishes she had an abortion.

      Hugs and kisses,

      Juan Epstein

    2. Re:Cost per unit of water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how long do you want to run it for?

  10. Vaparators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first job was programming binary loader-lifters, very similar to vaparators in most respects.

  11. It's not just a good idea... by kd3bj · · Score: 1

    The heat of vaporization of water is about 2,260 kJ/kg. It's the law.

    1. Re:It's not just a good idea... by PPH · · Score: 1

      2,260 kJ/kg

      THIS is what I want to see. How does that little CPU cooler condenser scale up to these levels?

      TFA indicates that this device operates on a night/day cycle. The MOF absorbs atmospheric moisture at night and releases it into the condenser during the day. So it's really just a bed of desiccant. Probably more efficient and optimized for this application. But if you want to save some money on the zirconium, just save all those packages of silica-gel that come with electronics shipments.

      Dumping the condenser heat (see the figure above) could be achieved by a similar cyclical system. Cool a large mass during the night by radiation and use it to absorb the condenser's output during the day.

      There is a lot of engineering work that needs to go into this system to make it work. The MOF may turn out to be a relatively small part of the work.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:It's not just a good idea... by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

      So to determine if this is a scam or not, you turn it on and let it run all night. By morning the 1 kg unit should weigh at least 4kg because in order to generate 3 liters (3 kg) of water, you will have needed to absorb that much into the desiccant.

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    3. Re:It's not just a good idea... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Yes. But that only describes the performance of the desiccant. During the day, how much solar energy will it take to drive the moisture out of the desiccant and how much needs to be pulled out at the condenser? It's all a bunch of engineering/economic trade-offs. A much more efficient desiccant might not mean much if some other part of the cycle can't be implemented cost effectively.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  12. Solar Powered Refrigerator by randomErr · · Score: 2, Informative

    So, they hooked a solar cell to a thermoelectric cooling cell. Its the same tech as those USB refrigerators. You can build a basic a basic unit for $30-40.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They are doing some sort of magic with exotic materials that concentrate water vapor in the air prior to the condensation.

    2. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by avandesande · · Score: 1

      why not use the hot side of peltier junction instead of the sun to heat the MOF? Then it can cycle at night....

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh no. You're not as smart as you think.

    4. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Cause, that takes power... This is solar powered, which is not providing power at night.... Of course, you could add batteries...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's just a fancy version of silica gel in chamber that absorbs moisture during night when it's open and then closes during the day releasing condensed moisture.

    6. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Yes, pretty much. Dew points are a lot higher at night, so charge during the day and collect at night.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    7. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, that's not what they did. I know nobody here will RTFA before posting, but even the summary makes it clear this is a different approach.

    8. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, pretty much. Dew points are a lot higher at night, so charge during the day and collect at night.

      Sorry to nit pick, but the dew point hardly changes at night. The temperature falls and gets closer to the dew point, which means the relative humidity is much higher at night.

    9. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite the exotic materials that might be efficient or optimized, is there any real reason this wouldn't work in the same general way when using lower tech materials like a sponge or moss?

    10. Re:Solar Powered Refrigerator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not solar powered in that sense, its solar powered like a bicycle is human powered, passive heating only, no electricity. Technically with some light modifications you could make this thing flame-powered, you only need to heat the inside of the chamber to make the caught moisture evaporate again and condense on the bottom plate which is colder due to air cooling. Its a completely passive device and that's the really amazing part, its just using materials science to get the surface area of a football field or whatever into the space of a credit card and make that surface a hydro-attractive one that captures and holds moisture at specific temperatures.

      The neat thing is if the mean ground temperature 6-10ft underground is low enough, they could continue to grab moisture during the day by putting them in dry wells after emptying them, once the sun had done its work, and possibly grab an extra half-day's worth of water or more. It only depends on how fast the material can heat up and let go of its water.

  13. Just needs a $1000 solar panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, all it needs is a $1000 solar panel and you are set, in fact screw that, just hand them the cash and let them buy a tanker of water, 1000 bucks goes a long way, be better for the environment too, no lithium/sillicon mining, no manufacturing with massive amounts of electricity never mind the transatlantic shipping or transportation, its almost the most inefficient way possible of converting energy into water.

    1. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you give a man a fish- he can eat for a day. If you teach a man to fish, better hope he doesn't live in the desert.

      I don't know where you're getting the cost of $1000 solar panel. For one appliance it's not going to cost that much. It's probably not going to cost anything in the same range as that. Even if it did. Yes, $1000 can buy a lot of water if you live near a water source. If you have to keep shipping water hundreds of miles then the costs are going to go up.

      Wouldn't it be better to ship one time to a location rather than having to ship continuously for years? Also, if you have your own means of getting water you don't have to worry about- what if guerrillas take out the delivery man and steal my water? What if the shipment never arrives? You're more independent. In the end, we all want our fate and future as much in our own hands as possible.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      Great, all it needs is a $1000 solar panel and you are set

      Solar powered does not imply solar panels. It runs off the heat differential between a sunlit top and a shaded, air cooled condenser.

    3. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      you don't have to worry about- what if guerrillas take out the delivery man and steal my water?

      No, you have to worry about "what if the guerrillas take my water-making gadget?"

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1000 in solar panels is close to 1000 watts of power. I can live very comfortably with that kind of power generation, even having Airconditioning in my mud hovel as well as running wifi and a refridgerator.

      Am I talking about the shit quality stuff sold in the USA? nope. am I talking about a proper efficient setup? yep. Plus have left over power to charge a 600Ah battery bank to run the ac/fridge/TV set/ laptop/ and lights at night.

      I'm guessing you have zero clue as to the cost of solar today.

    5. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $300 in solar panels is close to 1000 watts of power.

      $1000 should buy you about 3000W.

    6. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't have to worry about- what if guerrillas take out the delivery man and steal my water?

      No, you have to worry about "what if the guerrillas take my water-making gadget?"

      You can't avoid that worry, as more likely, it's "What if the Guerrillas decide to kill me, rape my wife and daughters, and steal everything of value I own?" that you have to worry about.

      But hey, at least it's not Gorillas. They die in the winter. And they got rid of the snakes.

    7. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      You just have to provide the proper squeeze to the Hutts, and you're good.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    8. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, OP must be trolling. It doesn't even use solar cells.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    9. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Great, all it needs is a $1000 solar panel and you are set

      Solar powered does not imply solar panels. It runs off the heat differential between a sunlit top and a shaded, air cooled condenser.

      Yeah, good catch. Half the numbnuts posting on this are chattering on about solar cell efficiency and cost, etc.

      Not that this is bad. I come here for the tangents as much as for the articles.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    10. Re:Just needs a $1000 solar panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but what about those scavenging Jawas?

  14. Vapor-ware by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that really is VAPOR ware. ;)

  15. Every single one of these has been debunked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every single one of these type of devices has been debunked. Often they are designed by idiots that don't understand the science behind what they are working on but sometimes they're just outright frauds.

    This is probably yet another one. They might as well be selling perpetual motion machines.

  16. Sure we can but should we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of those things that it seems few people pause to ponder.

    The desert is already a very delicate ecosystem because of it's extreme nature. While I don't doubt that it is possible to extract water from the atmosphere on a relatively large scale... what do people think is going to happen to the deserts equilibrium when that starts happening?

    Frequently it is approached from an individual perspective, sure my doing X has very little effect on the environment but when thousands of people are also doing X the effect isn't nearly as insignificant.

  17. Human water needs by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    A human only needs around 1l of water a day to survive.

    You will respirate and pee away well more than 1 liter per day under normal circumstances even if you aren't in a desert and are doing nothing active. Water requirements can easily exceed that substantially if you are sweating significantly or if it is very hot.

    1. Re:Human water needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're in the desert shelter by day, walk at night, drink your own pee. Bear Grylls drinks his own pee all the time, and he stays at 4-star hotels.

    2. Re:Human water needs by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Rich people have the weirdest fetishes...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Human water needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In his defense, Bear Grylls pee tastes AMAZING...............or so I hear.

    4. Re:Human water needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surviving while sitting tight in the shade for rescue is one thing, actually being active in the desert is another. When we visited Death Valley the recommendation was to bring along 1 gallon per person per day and these days that's a place where you're only in real danger if you go off-roading without telling anyone first where you are going and when you should be back.

    5. Re:Human water needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who regularly bikes in Phoenix at 2PM in August - 1 gallon a day is very underestimated. For a 55 mile ride (4 hours) I end up usually drinking close to 2.5 gallons. The human body can absorb a litter per hour

    6. Re:Human water needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in the desert shelter by day, walk at night, drink your own pee.

      That only works for 1 or 2 cycles. You might want to start before running out of water and mixing it with the water. Check with Bear for preferred recipes/ratios.

    7. Re:Human water needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In his defense, Bear Grylls pee tastes AMAZING...............or so I hear.

      Must be all the pineapple

    8. Re:Human water needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in the desert shelter by day, walk at night, drink your own pee.

      That only works for 1 or 2 cycles. You might want to start before running out of water and mixing it with the water. Check with Bear for preferred recipes/ratios.

      Why wait? Start now!

        I've got a quart in the fridge, making lemonade with it. Good stuff, the kids love to set up a little stand and sell it for a quarter a cup on a hot day.

  18. Reporting too sunny to be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here the shadyness is in the reporting, to wit:

    The summary and the linked article say: ``The device can produce nearly 3 liters of water per day''.

    Yet the abstract says, last sentence: ``This device is capable of harvesting 2.8 liters of water per kilogram of MOF daily at relative humidity levels as low as 20%, and requires no additional input of energy.''

    There is unlikely to be a full kg of MOF in the pictured device.

  19. Yes but... by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 1

    ...do you need a droid that speaks the binary language of moisture vaporators (which is very similar to binary load lifters) to operate it?

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  20. Long Live The Fremen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Muad'dib have come back

  21. Need 3L not 1L ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    I have no idea where you're getting 300L a day. A human only needs around 1l of water a day to survive.

    No, active adults need about 3L not 1L. So with this device producing about 2.8L it could sustain a single person. Things get complicated with activity levels and climate, and water in food counts towards the total.

    The 1L per day figure is life raft level rationing where you are sedentary and either rescued from the sea in a few days or likely to die so additional water is unlikely to change the outcome.

  22. water from desert air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    water from desert air

    Thought something similar had already been developed years ago and the military had some.

  23. 300L is total western water usage by perpenso · · Score: 1

    I have no idea where you're getting 300L a day. A human only needs around 1l of water a day to survive.

    It sounds like total water usage in the west once you consider showers, toilets, cooking, cleaning, etc.

    1. Re: 300L is total western water usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drink 4L - 6L / day

    2. Re:300L is total western water usage by Stoertebeker · · Score: 1

      It sounds like total water usage in USA once you consider showers, toilets, cooking, cleaning, etc.

      There, fixed that for you

      Water usage in most European countries is about 1/2 that.

    3. Re:300L is total western water usage by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      average water usage in the usa is 525L
      Water usage for several european countries and mexico are over 300L per day by the same measure.

      This sounds crazy high since my water usage is under 1000G per month or under 126 liters per day. I don't know how much under because that's the minimum bill.

      http://www.data360.org/dsg.asp...

      A huge factor would be more lawns in the U.S. since we still have low population density. If our population was as dense as europe, then our water usage per citizen would be way lower because more people would not have lawns.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:300L is total western water usage by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Does that include agricultural and industrial water use?

    5. Re:300L is total western water usage by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Does that include agricultural and industrial water use?

      Very doubtful, that sounds like personal use or maybe household use / occupancy.

    6. Re:300L is total western water usage by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Then it's irrelevant.

  24. Condensers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had better have those units in the South Ridge repaired by midday, or there'll be hell to pay.

  25. Global drying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could that become a thing if billions of people start using these?

    1. Re:Global drying by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I would expect by making the air dryer by taking moisture out, you would probably also proportionally increase the rate at which water evaporates into it, so if enough people used these, I could totally see a consequence being a lower amount of rainfall overall. While this is not directly problematic for us, being able to extract all of the water that we need from the atmosphere, (and not a problem for the atmosphere, since it will get re-evaporated), this could be a very big problem for plant life which depends on rainfall to thrive, and so by virtue of the food chain may impact us very adversely.

    2. Re:Global drying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Average rainfall in the Saharan desert is 25mm per year. Let's say 20mm. The Saharan desert is 9.2 million square miles. Therefore, the volume of rainfall is 184km^3 (9,200,000km^2 * .00002km), or 1.84*10^13 liters per year of rainfall. Rainfall is just excess moisture that precipitates from the air, so the actual volume of liquid is going to be much, much higher than this...and the Saharan desert is one of the driest areas on the planet. In other words, there is no way this device, or any device that pulls anything on the order of magnitude of 1, 10, or even 100 liters per day per person, is going to cause any noticeable drying of the air in aggregate. Even localized drying is not really likely due to convection mixing of the air, and the fact that the moisture is going to be expelled in roughly the same areas where it is collected.

    3. Re:Global drying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will make the air dryer, just like windmills will cause the wind to run out. IOW, no. The air is very big and there's a lot of water in it.

  26. YouTube debunker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thunderf00t is not going to like this...

  27. Water Abundance X-Prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI, prepare to hear a lot more about various water condensing technologies. The X-Prize Foundation is launching a competition to design a unit that can produce 2000 Liters per day at total cost of $.02 per Liter, from renewable energy sources.
    http://water.xprize.org/

    Anonymous Because I'm Lazy

  28. Where was this tested? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Where did they test this thing and what was the relative humidity during the test? 3 liters isn't enough for one person to survive on in the desert (1 gallon per person per day) so you'd really need a lot of them for normal daily use and a lot more to be able to grow crops.

    1. Re:Where was this tested? by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Maybe it works even better for a sailboat on the ocean. A silent water maker that can generate a few liters of water each day sound pretty useful to me even when not in the desert.

      --
      Nullius in verba
  29. Gee, what a great plan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taking water away from a place where it's already scarce. It's not like the desert needs it, right?

  30. So what can you use this water for? by Dissenter · · Score: 1

    I mean if drinking distilled water is bad for you, long term, without adding the minerals that your body needs, that's not really a good solution. Plus, I expect this water is going to be pretty hot since it's sitting in the desert sun, so that the solar panels can power it, so... Maybe the real application for this is that they have a really fancy way to boil a pot of water to cook their noodles? I didn't really think that my 10 cent pack of ramen needed a more cost effective cooking mechanism, but if they put it on Kickstarter, I'm totally buying one because that obviously means that I need it. /sarcasm

    --

    Dissenter
    "There is no knowledge that is not power."

    1. Re:So what can you use this water for? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      I mean if drinking distilled water is bad for you, long term, without adding the minerals that your body needs, that's not really a good solution

      There are minerals in the food.

  31. The technology already exists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Israeli firm to provide drinking water — from the air — for India and VietnamDeal to benefit remote Indian villages, Hanoi residents, announced days after Alan Dershowitz showcased Water Gen device at AIPAC"

    http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-firm-to-provide-drinking-water-from-the-air-for-india-and-vietnam/

  32. Thunderf00t does the math on this by Dr.Altaica · · Score: 3, Informative
  33. Not one person... by Abalamahalamatandra · · Score: 1

    has typed the words "moisture vaporators" prior to this?

    Damn, has this place gone downhill.

    1. Re:Not one person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      has typed the words "moisture vaporators" prior to this?

      Damn, has this place gone downhill.

      There are no less than four Star Wars references, as well as several to Dune, and also Bear Grylls. All of which were before your post.

      Sorry, you're out of touch.

      At least complain that there's no Battlestar Galactica reference.

  34. These MOFs ain't got no water for ya. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Know wa'am say'n?

  35. I already have one by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    New Solar-Powered Device Can Pull Water Straight From the Desert Air

    Yeah, it's called a sheet of plastic.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  36. Realism by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

    Second-world community I knew had a condenser for night dew installed by a global charity. Two nights later, the locals had stolen the polythene sheeting on which it relied. 'Appropriate Technology' Rules OK.

  37. Have seen this before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was at an Earth Day festival in Santa Barbara CA, year before last. I don't remember the pricing for the appliances, but the one that I remember was $1000 new ($800 or 900 for a demo model) and it would do 16 litres of water per day, depending on humidity and tempurature. It was the height of a typical water cooler. While I thought the pricing was somewhat high, I figure that in places where water can sometimes run out (certain places and certain times of the year in South Asia), it's nice to have some insurance. Nevertheless, this is hardly news.

  38. This will have a major impact on the globe by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    if implemented widescale, it will screw up weather patterns globally. there's a finite amount of water on the earth.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    1. Re:This will have a major impact on the globe by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Where do you suppose it goes after we drink it?

  39. Desert Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using one of these on Arrakis for years..

  40. Water from air? by hduff · · Score: 1

    But . . . people fart in it.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  41. Woopty Doo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a solar-powered dehumidifier. Yipee.

  42. Non-paywalled link (and better explanation) by LesserWeevil · · Score: 1
  43. It's not 3 liters... by davros74 · · Score: 1

    It should be 30 deciliters. C'mon, get the units right. It's a windtrap.

    --Shai-Hulud

    1. Re:It's not 3 liters... by davros74 · · Score: 1

      Whoops, I have to turn in my sci-fi geek card. That should be 0.3 decaliters/day.

      It will still take quite a while to collect millions of them. But when we have enough...

  44. Dave Jones, where are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What powers the cooling of the condenser? It takes a lot of juice to condense water out of air.

  45. Let's politiciz3 this shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the obvious place 2 start is by asking the question: "isn't this going to affect the climate if we build enough of these things?"

    If the answer is yes, does that mean these devices are a republican conspiracy to destroy mother nature.if the answer is no does this not mean this is a democratic conspiracy to keep promote abortions and gun control.

    These questions seem obvious to me and I expect the crack journalist on CNN, Fox and Slashdot to begin debating this shit

  46. bankruptcy is cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? The solar "manufacturers" aren't. They're assemblers. They exist to extract government subsidies and have no long-term plans. Bankruptcy will take care of the warranties for them.

  47. Re: Farmers by slashrio · · Score: 1

    Yeah, imagine how much kg of copper one would need for 1 acre of, let's say, corn.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  48. slashdot news are outdated and irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. copy paste some old news
    2. post it
    3. profit