and this is when you realize that moderation on this site is completely crooked and 100% in line with the agenda of the publisher and the interests holding its leash
Yes it is indeed a matter of social contract. I think your dogma has blinded you if not lobotomized you.
The social contract, since ancient times, is that the state keeps disease out of it's borders. It stops disease from entering first and foremost, and also removes disease from within its borders. This new solution of modifying the population itself and relieving that state of that duty is unjustified.
You are totally insane. You are blaming the presence of disease on the innocent. It was not by any wrong action of theirs that they become contaminated. It was by wrong action of the state, acting out of ravenous greed, importing countless people from all over the world to drive down the cost of labor, and it's failure to screen for disease.
People do not desire the freedom to move abroad as much as they desire the freedom to live their lives naturally in their own homes. That is, unless the are wealthy and don't value their home. Which are you?
This entire situation is horrifying. What is worse I don't know: the fact that the application of such medicine is mandated by the state the fact that such medication is necessary or how these dogmatic people verbally ravage anyone with standing on their sovereignty
People are not cattle. But our leaders and apparently many of our peers think they are, whether they have the fortitude to realize it or not. In a free society you cannot force people to modify their bodies like this. The state cannot mandate what the composition of your body is to be. This is an extremely profound destruction of freedom. Any evidence to any immediate benefit is irrelevant in whole.
The point is it is the responsibility of the state to keep these diseases out of its borders, it is not the responsibility of the masses to compensate for this failure in policy and be complicit in a failure of justice and freedom also.
As soon as I hear anything blamed on North Korea, I think to analyze whether or not the western government would have an interest in the culpable act.
It sounds likely to me that the west is keeping a very sharp eye out for defectors. South Korea and Japan as governments are slaves to western interest, but North Korea is gaining appeal despite what you may hear in the western media. Russia is also gaining allies. The glamour of western capitalism is wearing off and the west doesn't want their vital resources worn off with it. Their surveillance powers are less concrete in the asian colonies. Too much to explain to too many people (who don't speak "western business" let alone English proficiently). So a direct approach like malware is good.
Does no guilt lie with the designers of protocols? Can not the possibility be acknowledged that protocols were designed to cull people who "aren't worth saving"? There is no accountability. The tone of the article proves it. Where accountability is lacking morality is exceeded. This is not some irrelevant generalization. This is natural law, provable by induction. As though such thoughts would never cross the mind of every ordinary person, let alone one who acts as society's interface to life and death: "If they have lived a full life, have been productive in their career and the raising of their family, what else could they offer? Their days of productivity are at an end, and it would perhaps be cruel to make them go on hobbled or lame."
BEING IN NORTH KOREA IS LIKE BEING IN TIME-OUT FOR NAUGHTY BABIES THAT DO EVERYTHING WRONG ITS NOT FAIR ITS NOT FFFAAAAIIIIRRRRRRR
EVERYTHING THEY DO IS FUCKIN STUPID LOOK AT ALL THE FUCKIN SHIT THEY DO THAT FUCKIN SUCKS ASS-SHIT
WHY DO I HAVE TO FUCKIN HEAR ABOUT THIS FUCKIN SHIT AND HAVE TO KNOW THAT THERE ARE PLACES I CAN THEORETICALLY GO AND NOT BE ALLOWED TO DO EVERYTHING THAT >>>>I WANT TO DO???? SOMEONE SHOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT FUCKIN BULLSHIT WHY DIDN'T WE WIN THE KOREAN WAR WE SHOULD HAVE ANOTHER ONE YEAH WE SHOULD HAVE ANOTHER ONE THAT WOULD BE COOL HEHEHEHEHE YEAH
I think the definition of tourette's syndrome should be expanded to include the kind of compulsive self-centered illogical thinking that is pervasive in the western populations. Because if you render it a certain way, it's nothing but profanity. Profanity against the love of knowledge, of reason, of morality, of everything this society is supposedly built on since ancient times. Everything falls to the wayside in pursuit of deeper slavery.
That's right! We, your leaders; the wealthy; the elite, can't fuck anything up. It's impossible. Keep trusting us forever. Because our system WILL last forever! Relax, sit back, and enjoy. Your input is barely required. Do your job for a few years and your spot in heaven is assured. If anything seems to go wrong it is but an illusion. If it bothers you simply divert your attention!
The powers that be are acting through the MPAA to express the want for the people who are most addicted to the media to have to get jobs and leave the comfort of their parents' homes.
What you are supposed to get out of this story: "HEHE Look how SILLY this law is! That silly old government [with the most educated people in the world filling its offices] keeps making silly dumb laws! If only we could get people who understood the ISSUES to make laws for us everything would be OK! OH WELLLLL"
This is one of the oldest tricks in the book. Feigning ignorance to herd people into a viewpoint which is more sympathetic to the subject than the viewpoint of the truth: malicious intent against the viewer.
This law is a power grab. There is nothing ignorant about it. This is pressure on an important area for the rich/high-class/corporate interest.
Don't ever fall for this trick! Now the question is, why is this site and the referenced news agency helping with this deception? Surely a PROFESSIONAL would be aware of the possibility of this deception? Of course they are. So why are they helping? It couldn't be because the tangled interests essentially make the media interest and the corporate interest one body could it? No, that would be CONSPIRACY and would be very wrong indeed to think about!!!
This is a really insidious example of the information war. Really, really bad. It's part of the campaign to control people who would begin to distrust society in general.
Basically the entire problem of this article is that it keeps repeating the implicit idea that scrutiny belongs within a particular scope and that there is such a thing as "THE TRUTH". It is completely incoherent and comes to no precise conclusion. The article is just an excuse to shoot out a few polarizing phrases to derail rational ('meta') thought. It is meant to confuse people trying to take stock of the situation with the information war. It tries to tranquilize your instinct to find a pattern here by assuring you that there is a branch of OFFICIAL SCIENCE that is combating that dang old problem of people being so fucking stupid.
But how you ask? It plays wide by getting people to agree with it that smoking causes bad health. Then it fires a scatter shot citing unsupported examples of various events that are implied to be deceptive yet are still implied to have clear explanations (as though that isn't contradictory). It starts playing tight by trying to get people to agree with it that "climate change" is real without defining what climate change is at all or presenting any anecdote or data. Then it just swings. It makes the implication that there is always an 'objectively correct' side to every issue by implying "there are not two sides to every story". Then it broadens out again: "When people do not understand a concept or fact, they are prey for special interest groups who work hard to create confusion". OH WOW you don't say what a revelation. Are you beginning to see the pattern? Pressure, release, pressure, release, but with a consistent underlying force going in one direction - ambiguity. It puts the cherry on top of the crap sundae by citing the idea that "the internet makes people think they are smarter than they are" without going into any implications, purposely leaving you to think about that in light of the nebulous collection of statements already presented ("Am >>I one of the people who makes mistakes when making up my own mind??") And then it adds the sprinkles: the politically biased statement. Not necessary to the overall point of the article, but it takes an opportunity to try to influence your view of politics while you are maybe distracted from trying to sort out this nonsense.
The crime is that it proposes that complex matters can be distilled into simple ideas of "true" and "false" for some vague purpose of "understanding". It completely subverts the broad picture that it vaguely implies to address. The question "What do I need to know and why?" That is the antidote to this poison.
I propose a definition: They are various sorts of financial transactions that society lacks the concrete mechanism to define.
They are supported and accepted by society as a whole, especially by those high in the hierarchy. But why is the concrete mechanism of definition lacking? Is there a lack of academic resources to create such a mechanism in accordance with the other mechanisms of financial transaction? No, it is not the cost of the academic resources that is prohibitive, it is the cost of having such a mechanism in the open.
Take this opportunity to soak in the fact that the economy is completely fixed. Bribes are a sign of information that is vital to economic function being withheld from the public.
Presently there is no opportunity for hard work, creativity, and vision to pay off in a lasting way on their own. There is no freedom in this world without united awareness of this fact of the current circumstances. But there used to be, and there could be.
Now scoff at this, forget about it, and go back to your labor, slave.
Slashdot Mirror
That. And this new solution is necessary because of the fact that they ignored these duties consistently two-hundred years ago to present.
astute
and this is when you realize that moderation on this site is completely crooked and 100% in line with the agenda of the publisher and the interests holding its leash
Yes it is indeed a matter of social contract. I think your dogma has blinded you if not lobotomized you.
The social contract, since ancient times, is that the state keeps disease out of it's borders. It stops disease from entering first and foremost, and also removes disease from within its borders. This new solution of modifying the population itself and relieving that state of that duty is unjustified.
You are totally insane. You are blaming the presence of disease on the innocent. It was not by any wrong action of theirs that they become contaminated. It was by wrong action of the state, acting out of ravenous greed, importing countless people from all over the world to drive down the cost of labor, and it's failure to screen for disease.
People do not desire the freedom to move abroad as much as they desire the freedom to live their lives naturally in their own homes.
That is, unless the are wealthy and don't value their home. Which are you?
This entire situation is horrifying.
What is worse I don't know:
the fact that the application of such medicine is mandated by the state
the fact that such medication is necessary
or how these dogmatic people verbally ravage anyone with standing on their sovereignty
People are not cattle. But our leaders and apparently many of our peers think they are, whether they have the fortitude to realize it or not.
In a free society you cannot force people to modify their bodies like this. The state cannot mandate what the composition of your body is to be. This is an extremely profound destruction of freedom. Any evidence to any immediate benefit is irrelevant in whole.
The point is it is the responsibility of the state to keep these diseases out of its borders, it is not the responsibility of the masses to compensate for this failure in policy and be complicit in a failure of justice and freedom also.
As soon as I hear anything blamed on North Korea, I think to analyze whether or not the western government would have an interest in the culpable act.
It sounds likely to me that the west is keeping a very sharp eye out for defectors. South Korea and Japan as governments are slaves to western interest, but North Korea is gaining appeal despite what you may hear in the western media. Russia is also gaining allies. The glamour of western capitalism is wearing off and the west doesn't want their vital resources worn off with it. Their surveillance powers are less concrete in the asian colonies. Too much to explain to too many people (who don't speak "western business" let alone English proficiently). So a direct approach like malware is good.
Maybe on the part of the front-line physicians.
Does no guilt lie with the designers of protocols? Can not the possibility be acknowledged that protocols were designed to cull people who "aren't worth saving"?
There is no accountability. The tone of the article proves it. Where accountability is lacking morality is exceeded. This is not some irrelevant generalization. This is natural law, provable by induction.
As though such thoughts would never cross the mind of every ordinary person, let alone one who acts as society's interface to life and death: "If they have lived a full life, have been productive in their career and the raising of their family, what else could they offer? Their days of productivity are at an end, and it would perhaps be cruel to make them go on hobbled or lame."
NORTH KOREA IS STUPID
THEY ARE STU-PED
BEING IN NORTH KOREA IS LIKE BEING IN TIME-OUT FOR NAUGHTY BABIES THAT DO EVERYTHING WRONG ITS NOT FAIR ITS NOT FFFAAAAIIIIRRRRRRR
EVERYTHING THEY DO IS FUCKIN STUPID LOOK AT ALL THE FUCKIN SHIT THEY DO THAT FUCKIN SUCKS ASS-SHIT
WHY DO I HAVE TO FUCKIN HEAR ABOUT THIS FUCKIN SHIT AND HAVE TO KNOW THAT THERE ARE PLACES I CAN THEORETICALLY GO AND NOT BE ALLOWED TO DO EVERYTHING THAT >>>>I WANT TO DO???? SOMEONE SHOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT THAT FUCKIN BULLSHIT WHY DIDN'T WE WIN THE KOREAN WAR WE SHOULD HAVE ANOTHER ONE YEAH WE SHOULD HAVE ANOTHER ONE THAT WOULD BE COOL HEHEHEHEHE YEAH
I think the definition of tourette's syndrome should be expanded to include the kind of compulsive self-centered illogical thinking that is pervasive in the western populations. Because if you render it a certain way, it's nothing but profanity. Profanity against the love of knowledge, of reason, of morality, of everything this society is supposedly built on since ancient times. Everything falls to the wayside in pursuit of deeper slavery.
The BBC is on a collision course with the government like my nose is on a collision course with my face
You say that like american business didn't invent modern industrial espionage. Did you miss WW2?
Hahaha wow, that seems like kind of a key detail to the situation.
Fair trade
or
Trade secrets
Pick one.
you are so very stupid to use that as a reference
That's right! We, your leaders; the wealthy; the elite, can't fuck anything up. It's impossible.
Keep trusting us forever. Because our system WILL last forever!
Relax, sit back, and enjoy. Your input is barely required. Do your job for a few years and your spot in heaven is assured.
If anything seems to go wrong it is but an illusion. If it bothers you simply divert your attention!
Especially from the government
ESPECIALLY from the FBI
SUPEREXTRASPECIALLY if they make a months-long media spectacle of it
cuz its true :))))
do you know what institutionalization is?
Get this advertisement bullshit outta here
The powers that be are acting through the MPAA to express the want for the people who are most addicted to the media to have to get jobs and leave the comfort of their parents' homes.
What you are supposed to get out of this story:
"HEHE Look how SILLY this law is!
That silly old government [with the most educated people in the world filling its offices] keeps making silly dumb laws!
If only we could get people who understood the ISSUES to make laws for us everything would be OK! OH WELLLLL"
This is one of the oldest tricks in the book. Feigning ignorance to herd people into a viewpoint which is more sympathetic to the subject than the viewpoint of the truth: malicious intent against the viewer.
This law is a power grab. There is nothing ignorant about it. This is pressure on an important area for the rich/high-class/corporate interest.
Don't ever fall for this trick!
Now the question is, why is this site and the referenced news agency helping with this deception? Surely a PROFESSIONAL would be aware of the possibility of this deception? Of course they are.
So why are they helping?
It couldn't be because the tangled interests essentially make the media interest and the corporate interest one body could it?
No, that would be CONSPIRACY and would be very wrong indeed to think about!!!
It is the best art for preparing the general population for the step down they are about to take in the new world economy
You know we would never lie to you....
You KNOW that
http://www.bbc.com/future/stor...
This is a really insidious example of the information war. Really, really bad. It's part of the campaign to control people who would begin to distrust society in general.
Basically the entire problem of this article is that it keeps repeating the implicit idea that scrutiny belongs within a particular scope and that there is such a thing as "THE TRUTH". It is completely incoherent and comes to no precise conclusion. The article is just an excuse to shoot out a few polarizing phrases to derail rational ('meta') thought. It is meant to confuse people trying to take stock of the situation with the information war. It tries to tranquilize your instinct to find a pattern here by assuring you that there is a branch of OFFICIAL SCIENCE that is combating that dang old problem of people being so fucking stupid.
But how you ask?
It plays wide by getting people to agree with it that smoking causes bad health. Then it fires a scatter shot citing unsupported examples of various events that are implied to be deceptive yet are still implied to have clear explanations (as though that isn't contradictory). It starts playing tight by trying to get people to agree with it that "climate change" is real without defining what climate change is at all or presenting any anecdote or data. Then it just swings. It makes the implication that there is always an 'objectively correct' side to every issue by implying "there are not two sides to every story". Then it broadens out again: "When people do not understand a concept or fact, they are prey for special interest groups who work hard to create confusion". OH WOW you don't say what a revelation. Are you beginning to see the pattern? Pressure, release, pressure, release, but with a consistent underlying force going in one direction - ambiguity.
It puts the cherry on top of the crap sundae by citing the idea that "the internet makes people think they are smarter than they are" without going into any implications, purposely leaving you to think about that in light of the nebulous collection of statements already presented ("Am >>I one of the people who makes mistakes when making up my own mind??")
And then it adds the sprinkles: the politically biased statement. Not necessary to the overall point of the article, but it takes an opportunity to try to influence your view of politics while you are maybe distracted from trying to sort out this nonsense.
The crime is that it proposes that complex matters can be distilled into simple ideas of "true" and "false" for some vague purpose of "understanding". It completely subverts the broad picture that it vaguely implies to address. The question "What do I need to know and why?" That is the antidote to this poison.
What are bribes really?
I propose a definition: They are various sorts of financial transactions that society lacks the concrete mechanism to define.
They are supported and accepted by society as a whole, especially by those high in the hierarchy.
But why is the concrete mechanism of definition lacking?
Is there a lack of academic resources to create such a mechanism in accordance with the other mechanisms of financial transaction?
No, it is not the cost of the academic resources that is prohibitive, it is the cost of having such a mechanism in the open.
Take this opportunity to soak in the fact that the economy is completely fixed. Bribes are a sign of information that is vital to economic function being withheld from the public.
Presently there is no opportunity for hard work, creativity, and vision to pay off in a lasting way on their own. There is no freedom in this world without united awareness of this fact of the current circumstances.
But there used to be, and there could be.
Now scoff at this, forget about it, and go back to your labor, slave.
ISIS BAD USA GOOD
ISIS BAD USA GOOD
ISIS BAD USA GOOD
There I just saved you the trouble of thinking about this or reading any of the posts here