It's not an "offer". It's a mandate. And how can you assume that mental health services are "help" with no trade-offs or negative effects? That these services are competent and serve the interest of the individual rather than the interest of the state or whoever is lobbying the state?
It's like some one replaced a 'rational' fuse with a 'compassion' penny in your fuse box. Your critical thought is just totally overridden with a dangerous result.
First off, the term "mental illness" means absolutely nothing yet everyone likes to pretend it has a specific meaning.
This is not to save money or alleviate overcrowded prisons.
This is to pave way for further destruction of due process and general tyranny.
This is to break down the barriers between government and health care and to compromise the privacy of medical information.
This is to make "mental health services" ubiquitous and to lower the burden of forcing people to go into counseling or taking mind-altering medication.
This is all meant to be justified by portraying an algorithmic process as objectively morally correct.
You go on and on about mental illness and use all these polarized terms but you never hint or imply what mental illness actually is. People like you are turning "mentally ill" into an expression synonymous with "practitioner of witchcraft"
Also there are no low income people who are ineligible for insurance for almost no cost. "Mental health services" are effectively free for all because they are effective in conditioning people to conformant behavior and this is good for the economy for many many reasons. That is the only goal of medicine in general. There is no such thing as accessible good, holistic care. Our society will never have this. The fundamental requirements for good care are directed contradicted by the requirements for our society to function. Basically the critical ingredient is ignorance/delusion/indoctrination. If too many people in high-paying positions of direct responsibility to others had a realistic point of view of society and social dynamics, they wouldn't stop at helping people with their problems on a case by case basis, they would start attacking the institutions that cause these problems systematically.
The point is the object that is being perceived by the public is not a person. They are perceiving the a (one-way) interface to a machine. It's not a matter of fun, it's a matter of practicality. The human aspects that a 'politician' lends to the machine behind them are insignificant to the purpose of the machine.
Also one way you can tell that you are seriously too wrapped up in this utter insanity is that you assumed I was putting down Hillary in some kind of effort to support another candidate. And that you completely missed the implications of what I was saying.
Get a grip! Seriously. None of this shit matters. It's all a distraction to delude you into thinking any of your problems can be solved by this false "democracy". Your opinion doesn't matter because you don't assert it unless you are asked to. Welcome to real life.
"the number of slots in universities and the number of high paying jobs is not fixed" Oh....wow......... Both are fixed by a certain demand. Supply and demand. Adding supply reduces demand. 1+1=2. Get it?
"America is actually a country of immigrants" "the smartest, most ambitious, most talented, most hard working people" "They worked hard, created value and the size of the economic pie grew" Wow you parrotting drone, do you think? What exactly did I say that convinced you that I forgot these gigantic fundamental underlying fact? Of course nothing, you just can't wait for a chance to spew the propaganda that's been burned into your brain-mush.
"First off" x2
"you are wrong that they are taking a slot away from an American" Foreigner has the job. American does not have the job. American cannot have the job because the foreigner has the job. What am I missing here? A lifetime of brainwashing that retardifies me into selectively applying a "1+1=2" level of logic?
Okay now that we've addressed all the mental diarrhea you've expressed, can you answer the question? Here it is again:
Can you explain to me exactly how it benefits you that foreign students should come and take up a slot in one of our universities and then take up a slot in one of our high-paying jobs? (HOW DOES IT BENEFIT YOU?) (WHY ARE YOU ADVOCATING?)
It's in the interest of the common people for the country to invest in educating its own people to meet the demand for all of the jobs in the country. It's in the interest of the jetsetting international business owners to scour the globe to import whatever talent can get their tasks done immediately.
Explain to me exactly how it benefits you that foreign students should come and take up a slot in one of our universities and then take up a slot in one of our high-paying jobs?
It there is no benefit to you over a US citizen taking up those slots.
So why are you advocating something that's not in your interest?
Reflex to hear yourself talk about a hot issue and to have the pleasure of appearing on the popular side.
This is why democracy is a failure. People are unaware of their own interest and readily side with anyone on a whim.
Unfortunately we HAVE stopped freaking out about slavery and that is why no one is really freaking about mass surveillance (the mine) and AI (the miner, the smith, and the axe-wielding executioner). People are content with their captivity. They might as well already be dead.
You know, if you put it in such dramatic, emotionally charged wording such as "Our future is being threatened. Our lives are at risk", it's very hard for anyone to take you seriously. If there's no tangible issues with heavy surveillance and only potential benefits for rooting out the "bad guys", most people will either champion for it or tolerate it. I think at this point, with everything that's been happening in the world (even just this year!), language like this just falls flat and will resonate with virtually no-one.
I tend to agree with you. But: There is nothing emotionally charged about it. It's a matter of fact. If the economy doesn't need us anymore, and our psychology is a known variable in entirety, we lose our way of life and the ability to defend against this loss. Take THAT seriously. If you haven't already reached such a conclusion, then what I have to say really isn't intended for you.
Is to wear you out thinking and talking about the aspects of the issue that don't matter by bringing up the same issue again and again before it really becomes a problem
Prejudice....You are using that as some kind of negative qualifier. You say it like some variables are being ignored. Pray tell, what are they? Abortion is barely-abstracted murder. If you are on the level of self-centered delusion that prevents you from seeing that, I'm not sure you have any free rational faculties. You accuse me of misconstruction and prejudice, yet you offer no competing point of view or any rebuttal at all except "where are your sources".
"Reliable sources". Or you could just know people. Or know something about human nature. The problem with "reliable sources" is that they do not exist. People lie about their intentions and feelings, and pollsters/staticians manipulate population selection and query results. Pro-life sources INVARIABLY say there is depression and regret after abortion, pro-choice sources INVARIABLY say there is no causation in the correlation, and neutral sources are INVARIABLY inconclusive. The point is that the judgement of depression is subjective and manipulable. You cannot get objective perspective on the matter from an "official source" handing down a judgement. The only thing for it is to use your own experience, knowledge, and judgement to look into the primary data for yourself. So basically you are using ignorance of this fact to substantiate your unreasoned prejudice.
The problem with people like you is that you need a source for everything. You need an authority to tell you it's okay to take a stance one way or another. Critical thought and personal experience hardly factor into it. You'll just sit in the middle as the world turns and your life slips away, ignoring your duty as a citizen because of your cowardice.
also see that you prefer to misconstrue what I wrote and use insults than address what I actually wrote.
I addressed what you wrote exactly. You just refuse to accept the implications because you are surprised by actual meaning behind your careless expression. Your point of view is inexcusably wrong. You deserve to be labeled and confronted. "Name-calling" is not inherently "infantile".
There is an endless discussion about everything but the real issue: Our freedom is being completely destroyed along with the hope that we will ever get it back. Our future is being threatened. Our lives are at risk.
You are REALLY invested in fantasizing about the guy who ripped out your argument and shoved it up your ass, aren't you? You're a neo-reactionary farm animal. You only think so far as is needed to justify the issues (as they exist in your deluded mind) on the line of popular opinion. Just take it like a man. You're wrong. Everything you think is wrong. The fact that there is a political movement that agrees with you is not a sign that you are right, it is a sign that you are wrong.
"not all females need to reproduce to perpetuate" The species is not the point. It is an overly broad social group. There are many other "social units of survival" that are much more important like family, tribe, nation, etc. But about what you said, in our history the opposite has been true. There has been no guarantee of the survival for even large social units anywhere remotely close to long enough for this to be imprinted on our genetics and instinct. We are not ants which have only one reproducing female at a time per colony, and very very few animals have a history like this that enabled them to solidify the fact that not all individuals need to reproduce into their genetics.
With mammals, which are social animals to begin with, there is an utterly obvious benefit to every female reproducing as much as possible. "Strength in numbers" is a fundamental truth to mammal life and has always been. Humans are configured unlike mammals like rabbits who are genetically used to overpopulating areas and can miscarry gracefully. There is a genetic assumption that every individual we manage to raise is absolutely invaluable. The gestation period speaks for itself. Every individual is a precious resource to be cultivated with every care. As many children as can be supported must be supported. That is the substance of women's instincts concerning child bearing. They can delude themselves with modern propaganda, but their instincts run deep and are much stronger. They cannot be suppressed indefinitely. Women who "don't want children" are literally severely mentally ill: their habits work against their instincts. But they get an excuse and a social movement to justify their self destruction because it's in the interest of the top of the social hierarchy.
You are so horribly and obviously wrong in your "thinking" and belief. "incorrect, incorrect, dogmatic, extreme" yet you excuse yourself from any reasoning. You are one ironic hypocrite. You have absolutely no valid perspective on life. You are a casualty of rewarded ignorance. You're a criminal bastard who needs the harshest re-education.
In other words you're making excuses for the status quo regardless of any morality or long-term view of economics. Get a grip! You've lost your mind.
Let me tell YOU something: most of those lost babies are mourned. The mothers did want them, they were just afraid to go through with birth and raising and providing for the child because of stress artificially imposed for the purpose of controlling the population of low-class people. "Oh I don't feel like having a baby, lets just flush this one down to the incinerator. (A couple years pass). Oh I do feel like having a baby after all, I guess we can keep this one. I don't need to justify my dismissal of human life on a whim, ITS MY BODY MY RULES I HAVE RIGHTS AOWIERJAOWIERJASOEIFJAOSIFJDN (feminist brainwashed expression continues)"
Food is not distributed to everyone....so instead of standing up for our own interest, we cower to the wishes of the distributors? Communities do not educate themselves to a "satisfactory level"? What is a satisfactory level? WHY is it like this? Is there no possibility of sabotage considering the blatant withholding of resources from these people?
So babies should be aborted/murdered because they're not wanted because their mothers are too stressed from being artificially poor and only those who work to fit into the current system should be fed? There is no duty to all people, they are worthless unless they serve?
You are what some would call a "house nigger" and an "Uncle Tom".
Lol what the fuck? You are going to have to realize at some point that your simplisms are not applicable to real life. You are still locked into this personally combative attitude. It's a sure sign that you feel you have no logical defense for your ideas and the only way to preserve the belief you've invested in is to display like an animal, moaning and growling but not actually attacking.
There is absolutely no clear counter-implication connecting the point you stated about low income correlating with fertility, which I will admit, to my points. You need a great deal more reasoning to even ASSERT that your overall point is true, but of course, you're above that, you're already a certified Smart Boy and you are exempt from critical thinking when you feel like adhering to dogma. Sorry but there is nothing coherent in your thinking. You just don't have a self-consistent view of broad circumstances.
But the point of this policy that I describe is precisely to fix this "problem" that you describe. The point is to downsize the population of worthless workers and eventually replace them with automation. Their worth as ballast at the base of society only goes so far. They are reproducing too much. They have to be sustained lest they become dangerous. That is why socialism and communism were invented. To ensure that there is consistent supply to meet the demand of those that aren't fitting into the economy to buy time to transition them out to a diminished existence. Welfare is the bid for time. Birth control is the transition out. It's population control. Eugenics. Genocide.
"Facebooks jobs is to be a nice social place" Oh really? How does it make its money then? By advertising. So let's rewrite that statement. "Facebooks jobs is to lure people into a false sense of security and use their personal information to control their economic activity"
You do realize the goal of limiting freedom of expression is to completely dominate a population? What freedom to fight back do you think we will have by the time your life is over? Do you mean to keep "rationalizing" tyranny and your inaction against it? Do you mean to keep meandering in your thought between the possible "peaceful solutions" while violence is done against your interests?
Oh that hapless FBI, they just don't know what they're doing! Even though they have access to a horrifying amount of your personal information through the TOTAL SURVEILLANCE STATE they just don't know what to do with it all and they'll probably never figure it out! I guess there is no threat to you freedom whatsoever.
What the presence of this story means is that facial recognition has been identified as a object of concern for the general public and that this is part of an effort to sooth fears. Even though the fears are well-justified and almost assuredly too conservative. Pure propaganda.
This story is outright dishonest by implicitly denying that the FBI has access to the full spectrum of information provided by military intelligence.
We are ruled by martial law and no one realizes it. The people in a position to see the situation and talk about it choose not to. We live in a society of cowards. It's time that those of us with our senses and courage intact think to make a move to secure our future.
Your tiny brain is trying to abstract this issue into some kind of liberal vs conservative issue. What if you released yourself from that intellectual torture device and looked at the variables for what they actually are?
The point is that the demand for food and education would force them to be provided. Unrest is a critical problem and it will be avoided at all costs. It is preferred by our ruling class that the cost should be paid with the blood of the lower people rather than precious resources that would be used to raise potential competitors.
Birth control is not about choices. It's about forcing a certain segment of the population to kill itself. It's leveraging the illusion of the free market to enact sophisticated slavery. Leadership says: "Oh you don't have enough to raise your child comfortably? It's just TOO BAD that you don't, I don't know why that is or what I could do about it! What tragedy? Well here is an OPTION for you...."
Basically the success of this slavery hinges on people like you thinking you understand the economy in your dogmatic belief that it is somehow infallible and beyond the control of organized manipulation. Even though the evidence to the contrary is obvious.
It all boils down to your utter cowardice. You delude yourself into thinking nothing is wrong simply because you have absolutely no idea what to do if something is indeed wrong. It's all about your personal comfort. Well the cost of that comfort is your future and your very humanity.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not an "offer". It's a mandate.
And how can you assume that mental health services are "help" with no trade-offs or negative effects? That these services are competent and serve the interest of the individual rather than the interest of the state or whoever is lobbying the state?
It's like some one replaced a 'rational' fuse with a 'compassion' penny in your fuse box. Your critical thought is just totally overridden with a dangerous result.
First off, the term "mental illness" means absolutely nothing yet everyone likes to pretend it has a specific meaning.
This is not to save money or alleviate overcrowded prisons.
This is to pave way for further destruction of due process and general tyranny.
This is to break down the barriers between government and health care and to compromise the privacy of medical information.
This is to make "mental health services" ubiquitous and to lower the burden of forcing people to go into counseling or taking mind-altering medication.
This is all meant to be justified by portraying an algorithmic process as objectively morally correct.
You go on and on about mental illness and use all these polarized terms but you never hint or imply what mental illness actually is.
People like you are turning "mentally ill" into an expression synonymous with "practitioner of witchcraft"
Also there are no low income people who are ineligible for insurance for almost no cost.
"Mental health services" are effectively free for all because they are effective in conditioning people to conformant behavior and this is good for the economy for many many reasons.
That is the only goal of medicine in general. There is no such thing as accessible good, holistic care. Our society will never have this.
The fundamental requirements for good care are directed contradicted by the requirements for our society to function.
Basically the critical ingredient is ignorance/delusion/indoctrination. If too many people in high-paying positions of direct responsibility to others had a realistic point of view of society and social dynamics, they wouldn't stop at helping people with their problems on a case by case basis, they would start attacking the institutions that cause these problems systematically.
That's why....how are grown men so fucking naive?
The point is the object that is being perceived by the public is not a person. They are perceiving the a (one-way) interface to a machine. It's not a matter of fun, it's a matter of practicality. The human aspects that a 'politician' lends to the machine behind them are insignificant to the purpose of the machine.
Also one way you can tell that you are seriously too wrapped up in this utter insanity is that you assumed I was putting down Hillary in some kind of effort to support another candidate. And that you completely missed the implications of what I was saying.
Get a grip! Seriously.
None of this shit matters. It's all a distraction to delude you into thinking any of your problems can be solved by this false "democracy". Your opinion doesn't matter because you don't assert it unless you are asked to. Welcome to real life.
"the number of slots in universities and the number of high paying jobs is not fixed"
Oh....wow.........
Both are fixed by a certain demand. Supply and demand. Adding supply reduces demand. 1+1=2. Get it?
"America is actually a country of immigrants"
"the smartest, most ambitious, most talented, most hard working people"
"They worked hard, created value and the size of the economic pie grew"
Wow you parrotting drone, do you think? What exactly did I say that convinced you that I forgot these gigantic fundamental underlying fact? Of course nothing, you just can't wait for a chance to spew the propaganda that's been burned into your brain-mush.
"First off" x2
"you are wrong that they are taking a slot away from an American"
Foreigner has the job. American does not have the job. American cannot have the job because the foreigner has the job. What am I missing here? A lifetime of brainwashing that retardifies me into selectively applying a "1+1=2" level of logic?
Okay now that we've addressed all the mental diarrhea you've expressed, can you answer the question?
Here it is again:
Can you explain to me exactly how it benefits you that foreign students should come and take up a slot in one of our universities and then take up a slot in one of our high-paying jobs?
(HOW DOES IT BENEFIT YOU?)
(WHY ARE YOU ADVOCATING?)
It's in the interest of the common people for the country to invest in educating its own people to meet the demand for all of the jobs in the country.
It's in the interest of the jetsetting international business owners to scour the globe to import whatever talent can get their tasks done immediately.
Stop saying "she". There is no "she". "She" is a massive team of strategists and advisors. "She" is a machine, not a person.
Explain to me exactly how it benefits you that foreign students should come and take up a slot in one of our universities and then take up a slot in one of our high-paying jobs?
It there is no benefit to you over a US citizen taking up those slots.
So why are you advocating something that's not in your interest?
Reflex to hear yourself talk about a hot issue and to have the pleasure of appearing on the popular side.
This is why democracy is a failure. People are unaware of their own interest and readily side with anyone on a whim.
Submission process: see on reddit, copy, paste, submit
Unfortunately we HAVE stopped freaking out about slavery and that is why no one is really freaking about mass surveillance (the mine) and AI (the miner, the smith, and the axe-wielding executioner). People are content with their captivity. They might as well already be dead.
I tend to agree with you. But:
There is nothing emotionally charged about it. It's a matter of fact. If the economy doesn't need us anymore, and our psychology is a known variable in entirety, we lose our way of life and the ability to defend against this loss. Take THAT seriously. If you haven't already reached such a conclusion, then what I have to say really isn't intended for you.
Is to wear you out thinking and talking about the aspects of the issue that don't matter by bringing up the same issue again and again before it really becomes a problem
Prejudice....You are using that as some kind of negative qualifier. You say it like some variables are being ignored. Pray tell, what are they?
Abortion is barely-abstracted murder. If you are on the level of self-centered delusion that prevents you from seeing that, I'm not sure you have any free rational faculties.
You accuse me of misconstruction and prejudice, yet you offer no competing point of view or any rebuttal at all except "where are your sources".
"Reliable sources". Or you could just know people. Or know something about human nature. The problem with "reliable sources" is that they do not exist. People lie about their intentions and feelings, and pollsters/staticians manipulate population selection and query results. Pro-life sources INVARIABLY say there is depression and regret after abortion, pro-choice sources INVARIABLY say there is no causation in the correlation, and neutral sources are INVARIABLY inconclusive. The point is that the judgement of depression is subjective and manipulable. You cannot get objective perspective on the matter from an "official source" handing down a judgement. The only thing for it is to use your own experience, knowledge, and judgement to look into the primary data for yourself.
So basically you are using ignorance of this fact to substantiate your unreasoned prejudice.
The problem with people like you is that you need a source for everything. You need an authority to tell you it's okay to take a stance one way or another. Critical thought and personal experience hardly factor into it. You'll just sit in the middle as the world turns and your life slips away, ignoring your duty as a citizen because of your cowardice.
I addressed what you wrote exactly. You just refuse to accept the implications because you are surprised by actual meaning behind your careless expression.
Your point of view is inexcusably wrong. You deserve to be labeled and confronted. "Name-calling" is not inherently "infantile".
You're apologizing for the complete and permanent destruction of freedom.
There is an endless discussion about everything but the real issue:
Our freedom is being completely destroyed along with the hope that we will ever get it back.
Our future is being threatened. Our lives are at risk.
You are REALLY invested in fantasizing about the guy who ripped out your argument and shoved it up your ass, aren't you?
You're a neo-reactionary farm animal. You only think so far as is needed to justify the issues (as they exist in your deluded mind) on the line of popular opinion.
Just take it like a man. You're wrong. Everything you think is wrong. The fact that there is a political movement that agrees with you is not a sign that you are right, it is a sign that you are wrong.
Just as I thought
"not all females need to reproduce to perpetuate"
The species is not the point. It is an overly broad social group. There are many other "social units of survival" that are much more important like family, tribe, nation, etc.
But about what you said, in our history the opposite has been true. There has been no guarantee of the survival for even large social units anywhere remotely close to long enough for this to be imprinted on our genetics and instinct. We are not ants which have only one reproducing female at a time per colony, and very very few animals have a history like this that enabled them to solidify the fact that not all individuals need to reproduce into their genetics.
With mammals, which are social animals to begin with, there is an utterly obvious benefit to every female reproducing as much as possible. "Strength in numbers" is a fundamental truth to mammal life and has always been. Humans are configured unlike mammals like rabbits who are genetically used to overpopulating areas and can miscarry gracefully. There is a genetic assumption that every individual we manage to raise is absolutely invaluable. The gestation period speaks for itself. Every individual is a precious resource to be cultivated with every care. As many children as can be supported must be supported.
That is the substance of women's instincts concerning child bearing. They can delude themselves with modern propaganda, but their instincts run deep and are much stronger. They cannot be suppressed indefinitely. Women who "don't want children" are literally severely mentally ill: their habits work against their instincts. But they get an excuse and a social movement to justify their self destruction because it's in the interest of the top of the social hierarchy.
You are so horribly and obviously wrong in your "thinking" and belief.
"incorrect, incorrect, dogmatic, extreme" yet you excuse yourself from any reasoning. You are one ironic hypocrite.
You have absolutely no valid perspective on life. You are a casualty of rewarded ignorance. You're a criminal bastard who needs the harshest re-education.
In other words you're making excuses for the status quo regardless of any morality or long-term view of economics.
Get a grip! You've lost your mind.
Let me tell YOU something: most of those lost babies are mourned. The mothers did want them, they were just afraid to go through with birth and raising and providing for the child because of stress artificially imposed for the purpose of controlling the population of low-class people.
"Oh I don't feel like having a baby, lets just flush this one down to the incinerator. (A couple years pass). Oh I do feel like having a baby after all, I guess we can keep this one. I don't need to justify my dismissal of human life on a whim, ITS MY BODY MY RULES I HAVE RIGHTS AOWIERJAOWIERJASOEIFJAOSIFJDN (feminist brainwashed expression continues)"
Food is not distributed to everyone....so instead of standing up for our own interest, we cower to the wishes of the distributors?
Communities do not educate themselves to a "satisfactory level"? What is a satisfactory level? WHY is it like this? Is there no possibility of sabotage considering the blatant withholding of resources from these people?
So babies should be aborted/murdered because they're not wanted because their mothers are too stressed from being artificially poor and only those who work to fit into the current system should be fed?
There is no duty to all people, they are worthless unless they serve?
You are what some would call a "house nigger" and an "Uncle Tom".
Lol what the fuck?
You are going to have to realize at some point that your simplisms are not applicable to real life.
You are still locked into this personally combative attitude. It's a sure sign that you feel you have no logical defense for your ideas and the only way to preserve the belief you've invested in is to display like an animal, moaning and growling but not actually attacking.
There is absolutely no clear counter-implication connecting the point you stated about low income correlating with fertility, which I will admit, to my points.
You need a great deal more reasoning to even ASSERT that your overall point is true, but of course, you're above that, you're already a certified Smart Boy and you are exempt from critical thinking when you feel like adhering to dogma. Sorry but there is nothing coherent in your thinking. You just don't have a self-consistent view of broad circumstances.
But the point of this policy that I describe is precisely to fix this "problem" that you describe. The point is to downsize the population of worthless workers and eventually replace them with automation. Their worth as ballast at the base of society only goes so far. They are reproducing too much. They have to be sustained lest they become dangerous. That is why socialism and communism were invented. To ensure that there is consistent supply to meet the demand of those that aren't fitting into the economy to buy time to transition them out to a diminished existence. Welfare is the bid for time. Birth control is the transition out.
It's population control. Eugenics. Genocide.
"Facebooks jobs is to be a nice social place"
Oh really? How does it make its money then?
By advertising.
So let's rewrite that statement.
"Facebooks jobs is to lure people into a false sense of security and use their personal information to control their economic activity"
Google is the same.
Your lack of critical thought is inexcusable.
But when will you actually DO SOMETHING about it?
You do realize the goal of limiting freedom of expression is to completely dominate a population? What freedom to fight back do you think we will have by the time your life is over? Do you mean to keep "rationalizing" tyranny and your inaction against it? Do you mean to keep meandering in your thought between the possible "peaceful solutions" while violence is done against your interests?
Oh that hapless FBI, they just don't know what they're doing! Even though they have access to a horrifying amount of your personal information through the TOTAL SURVEILLANCE STATE they just don't know what to do with it all and they'll probably never figure it out! I guess there is no threat to you freedom whatsoever.
What the presence of this story means is that facial recognition has been identified as a object of concern for the general public and that this is part of an effort to sooth fears. Even though the fears are well-justified and almost assuredly too conservative. Pure propaganda.
This story is outright dishonest by implicitly denying that the FBI has access to the full spectrum of information provided by military intelligence.
We are ruled by martial law and no one realizes it. The people in a position to see the situation and talk about it choose not to. We live in a society of cowards. It's time that those of us with our senses and courage intact think to make a move to secure our future.
No, it makes you an artificial intelligence running on fleshy hardware
Your tiny brain is trying to abstract this issue into some kind of liberal vs conservative issue. What if you released yourself from that intellectual torture device and looked at the variables for what they actually are?
The point is that the demand for food and education would force them to be provided.
Unrest is a critical problem and it will be avoided at all costs. It is preferred by our ruling class that the cost should be paid with the blood of the lower people rather than precious resources that would be used to raise potential competitors.
Birth control is not about choices. It's about forcing a certain segment of the population to kill itself. It's leveraging the illusion of the free market to enact sophisticated slavery. Leadership says: "Oh you don't have enough to raise your child comfortably? It's just TOO BAD that you don't, I don't know why that is or what I could do about it! What tragedy? Well here is an OPTION for you...."
Basically the success of this slavery hinges on people like you thinking you understand the economy in your dogmatic belief that it is somehow infallible and beyond the control of organized manipulation. Even though the evidence to the contrary is obvious.
It all boils down to your utter cowardice. You delude yourself into thinking nothing is wrong simply because you have absolutely no idea what to do if something is indeed wrong. It's all about your personal comfort. Well the cost of that comfort is your future and your very humanity.